3er Foro Económico de Pesca y Acuacultura. La Acuacultura: un alterrnativa para la alimentación...
-
Upload
kevon-winger -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of 3er Foro Económico de Pesca y Acuacultura. La Acuacultura: un alterrnativa para la alimentación...
3er Foro Económico de Pesca y Acuacultura.
La Acuacultura: un alterrnativa para la alimentación
Mexico City, 25 – 26 November 2013
Dr Lahsen AbabouchDirector, Policy and economics DivisionFisheries and Aquaculture Department
Food and Agriculture OrganizationRome, Italy
WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?
International trade in aquaculture products: opportunities and
challenges
Fishery production and utilizationFish production
(million tonnes live weight)Per capita fish supply (kg)
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2012
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0Aquaculture for human consumption
Capture for human consumption
Non-food uses
Per capita food fish supply
1976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012
0
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
120000000
140000000
Developed countries Developing countries
Export of fish and seafood: 1976 – 2012 (US $ billion)
Source: GTIS ® (2012)
Net exports of developing countries
Moderately exploited
-20000000
-10000000
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
199020002010
19761979
19821985
19881991
19941997
20002003
20062009
20120
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
Developed countries or areas Developing countries or areas
Trade (value)
Moderately exploited
19761979
19821985
19881991
19941997
20002003
20062009
20120
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
EXPORTS IMPORTS
Principaux pays importateurs et exportateurs en 2009, 2010 & 2011
Japan
United State
sChina
Spain
FranceChina
Norway
Thailand
Vietnam
United State
sChile
0
2000000000
4000000000
6000000000
8000000000
10000000000
12000000000
14000000000
16000000000
18000000000
20000000000
Source: GTIS ® (2012)
Trade by groups of species (value)
Moderately exploited
Shrimps, prawns
15%
Salmons, trouts, smelts
14%
Cods, hakes, had-docks
8%
Tunas, bonitos, billfishes
8%
Other pelagics7%
Other crustaceans6%
Cephalopods
5%
Other molluscs and aquatic in-
vertebrates6%
Other finfish25%
Fishmeal3%
Fish oil1%
Trade flows: Latin America (%)
Moderately exploited
Share of imports (value) in percentage
4
68
16
2
9
1
World fish trade for human consumption
Trend
Million tonnes (live weight)
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000Trend
Imports
Exports of fish for human consumption (Q)
2010-2012
Africa5%
North Amer-
ica8%
Latin Amer-
ica and Car-
ibbean
10%
Eu-rope22%
China21%
Other Asia and
Pacific34%
Africa4%
North America
8% Latin America and Car-ibbean
11%
Europe22%
China22%
Other Asia and Pacific34%
2022
2010-20122022
China9%
Other Asia and Pacific
32%
Africa10%
North America
15% Latin America and Car-ibbean
6%
Europe28% China
10%
Other Asia and Pa-cific31%
Africa10%
North America14%
Latin Amer-
ica and Car-
ibbean
6%
Eu-rope28%
Imports of fish for human consumption (Q)
Fish prices: upward trend
Traded products
USD/tonne
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Fish food traded Aquaculture
Capture
Fishmeal and Fish oil
USD/tonne
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Fishmeal
El NiñoFish oil
DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRYDECLARATION OF EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
Office of the Commissioner
State of LouisianaOffice of the Commissioner
State of Louisiana
Fluoroquinolones in Seafood Fluoroquinolones in Seafood
Consumer Safety
EU Rapid Alert System-by causes for Aquaculture
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
CAUSE total 50 101 247 103 137
(01-04)
46
total
Chloramphenicol00
44(43%)44
188(76%)102
73(71%)13
48(35%)8
26(57%)0
chemical nitrofurans 0 0 85 50 26 12
malachite green 0 0 1 10 14 14
total
Vibrio(parahaemolyticus/cholerae)
46(92%)
36(16/20)
57(56%)
38(25/13)
58(23%)
37(27/10)
29(28%)
15(13/2)
87(64%)
26(22/4)
19(41%)
2(2/0)
salmonella 6 12 17 2 13 4
biological mesophiles 3 6 4 2 6 4
listeria 0 0 0 10 34 7
e.coli 1 1 0 0 8 2
otherstotal
Labeling4(8%)
4 01(1%)
11(1%)
02(1%)
21(2%)
0
temp.control 0 0 0 1 0 1
379
55%
296
43%
9
2%
684
100%
EU data 2009
• “Corporate social responsibility”
- Legality (IUU)- Sustainability- Certification - Eco-labelling- Tracability and chain of custody- Social and Environmental aspects
Private standard
Buyers specifications
Supplier specifications Legal quality requirements
Legal food safety requirements
Private Label
B2CPrivate brand (B2B, B2C)
Basic manufactured
Generic commodity (fresh/frozen)
Diagramatic representation of market access requirements
FAO Guidelines for Aquaculture Certification1. Background2. Scope3. Terms and Definitions4. Users5. Application
6. Principles 7. Minimum Substantive Criteria
7.1 Animal Health and Welfare (OIE) 7.2 Food Safety 7.3 Environmental Integrity7.4 Social Responsibility
8. Institutional and procedural requirements8.1 Governance8.2 Standards Setting8.3 Accreditation8.4 Certification
9. Implementation http://www.fao.org/fishery/about/cofi/aquaculture/en
Harmonization and equivalenceComing together
Less duplication of schemes with less confusion to the consumer
Cost reduction
Benchmarking to FAO Guidelines (similar to GFSI Benchmarking for Food Safety)?
A consumer facing logo, globally recognised