3.3 Air Quality - acgov.org · Nitrogen dioxide Annual mean 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm 0.053 ppm 1‐hour...

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐1

October 2014ICF 00323.08

3.3 Air Quality Thissectiondescribestheregulatoryandenvironmentalsettingforairquality.Italsodescribesimpactsonairqualitythatwouldresultfromimplementationoftheprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsanddescribesmitigationforsignificantimpactswherefeasibleandappropriate.Mitigationmeasuresareprescribedwherefeasibleandappropriate.

GreenhousegasemissionsareconsideredseparatelyfromtheairqualityanalysisinthisPEIRinChapter3.7.

3.3.1 Existing Conditions

TheprogramareaiswithintheSanFranciscoBayAreaAirBasin(SFBAAB),whichencompassesanine‐countyregionconsistingofallofAlameda,ContraCosta,SantaClara,SanFrancisco,SanMateo,Marin,andNapaCountiesandthesouthernportionsofSolanoandSonomaCounties.BecausetruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin(SJVAB)totheprogramarea,thestudyareaalsoincludestheSJVAB.

Regulatory Setting

TheairqualitymanagementagenciesofdirectimportanceinAlamedaCountyareEPA,theCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(ARB),andtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD).EPAhasestablishedfederalairqualitystandardsforwhichARBandBAAQMDhaveprimaryimplementationresponsibility.ARBandBAAQMDarealsoresponsibleforensuringthatstateairqualitystandardsaremet.TheSanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict(SJVAPCD)hasjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.

Federal

Clean Air Act and National Ambient Air Quality Standards

ThefederalCleanAirAct(CAA),promulgatedin1963andamendedseveraltimesthereafter,includingthe1990CleanAirActamendments(CAAA),establishestheframeworkformodernairpollutioncontrol.TheActdirectsEPAtoestablishNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthesixcriteriapollutants(discussedinSection3.3.2,EnvironmentalSetting).TheNAAQSaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards;theformeraresettoprotecthumanhealthwithinanadequatemarginofsafety,andthelattertoprotectenvironmentalvalues,suchasplantandanimallife.Table3.3‐1summarizestheNAAQSandtheCaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards(CAAQS).

TheCAArequiresstatestosubmitastateimplementationplan(SIP)forareasinnonattainmentforfederalstandards.TheSIP,whichisreviewedandapprovedbyEPA,mustdemonstratehowthefederalstandardswouldbeachieved.Failingtosubmitaplanorsecureapprovalcanleadtodenialoffederalfundingandpermits.IncaseswheretheSIPfailstodemonstrateachievementofthestandards,EPAisdirectedtoprepareafederalimplementationplan.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐1. National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards

CriteriaPollutant AverageTimeCaliforniaStandards

NationalStandardsa

Primary Secondary

Ozone 1‐hour 0.09ppm Noneb Noneb

8–hour 0.070ppm 0.075ppm 0.075ppm

Particulatematter(PM10) 24‐hour 50g/m3 150g/m3 150g/m3

Annualmean 20g/m3 None None

Fineparticulatematter(PM2.5) 24‐hour None 35g/m3 35g/m3

Annualmean 12g/m3 12.0g/m3 15g/m3

Carbonmonoxide 8‐hour 9.0ppm 9ppm None

1‐hour 20ppm 35ppm None

Nitrogendioxide Annualmean 0.030ppm 0.053ppm 0.053ppm

1‐hour 0.18ppm 0.100ppm None

Sulfurdioxidec Annualmean None 0.030ppm None


3‐hour None None 0.5ppm


Lead 30‐dayAverage 1.5g/m3 None None

Calendarquarter None 1.5g/m3 1.5g/m3

3‐monthaverage None 0.15g/m3 0.15g/m3

Sulfates 24‐hour 25g/m3 None None

Visibility‐reducingparticles 8‐hour –d None None

Hydrogensulfide 1‐hour 0.03ppm None None

Vinylchloride 24‐hour 0.01ppm None None

Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013a.ppm = partspermillion.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.a Nationalstandardsaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards.Primarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublichealth,whereassecondarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublicwelfareandtheenvironment.

b Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillionwasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedbecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandabenchmarkforstateimplementationplans.

c Theannualand24‐hourNAAQSforSO2applyonlyforoneyearafterdesignationofthenew1‐hourstandardtothoseareasthatwerepreviouslynonattainmentareasforthe24‐hourandannualNAAQS.

d TheCAAQSforvisibility‐reducingparticlesisdefinedbyanextinctioncoefficientof0.23perkilometer(visibilityof10milesormoreduetoparticleswhenrelativehumidityislessthan70%).

Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule

Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,EPAestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Locomotivesandmarinevesselsareexemptfromthisrule.Manufacturersofoffroaddieselenginesarerequiredtoproduceenginesmeetingcertainemission


Air Quality



standardsbasedonthemodelyeartheenginewasmanufacturedbasedonthefollowingcomplianceschedule.

Tier1standardswerephasedinfrom1996to2000(yearofmanufacture),dependingontheenginehorsepowercategory.

Tier2standardswerephasedinfrom2001to2006.

Tier3standardswerephasedinfrom2006to2008.

Tier4standards,whichrequireadd‐onemissions‐controlequipmenttoattainthem,arecurrentlybeingphasedin,from2008to2015.

State

California Clean Air Act and California Ambient Air Quality Standards

In1988,thestatelegislatureadoptedtheCaliforniaCleanAirAct(CCAA),whichestablishedastatewideairpollutioncontrolprogram.UnlikethefederalCAA,theCCAAdoesnotsetpreciseattainmentdeadlines.Instead,theCCAArequiresallairdistrictsinthestatetoendeavortomeettheCAAQSbytheearliestpracticaldate.Eachairdistrict’scleanairplanisspecificallydesignedtoattainthestandardsandmustbedesignedtoachieveanannual5%reductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors.Whenanairdistrictisunabletoachievea5%annualreductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors,theadoptionof“allfeasiblemeasures”onanexpeditiousscheduleisacceptableasanalternativestrategy(HealthandSafetyCodeSection40914(b)(2)).CAAQSaregenerallymorestringentthantheNAAQSandincorporateadditionalstandardsforSO4,H2S,C2H3Cl,andvisibility‐reducingparticles.TheCAAQSandNAAQSarelistedtogetherinTable3.3‐1.

ARBandlocalairdistrictsbearresponsibilityforachievingtheCAAQSs,whicharetobeachievedthroughdistrict‐levelairqualitymanagementplansthatwouldbeincorporatedintotheSIP.InCalifornia,EPAhasdelegatedauthoritytoprepareSIPstoARB,which,inturn,hasdelegatedthatauthoritytoindividualairdistricts.ARBtraditionallyhasestablishedstateairqualitystandards,maintainingoversightauthorityinairqualityplanning,developingprogramsforreducingemissionsfrommotorvehicles,developingairemissioninventories,collectingairqualityandmeteorologicaldata,andapprovingSIPs.

TheCCAAsubstantiallyaddstotheauthorityandresponsibilitiesofairdistricts.TheCCAAdesignatesairdistrictsasleadairqualityplanningagencies,requiresairdistrictstoprepareairqualityplans,andgrantsairdistrictsauthoritytoimplementtransportationcontrolmeasures.TheCCAAalsoemphasizesthecontrolof“indirectandarea‐widesources”ofairpollutantemissions.TheCCAAgiveslocalairpollutioncontroldistrictsexplicitauthoritytoregulateindirectsourcesofairpollutionandtoestablishtrafficcontrolmeasures(TCMs).

Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation

Originallyadoptedin2005,theonroadtruckandbusregulationrequiresheavytruckstoberetrofittedwithparticulatematter(PM)filters.Theregulationappliestoprivatelyandfederallyowneddieselfueledtruckswithagrossvehicleweightrating(GWR)greaterthan14,000pounds.Compliancewiththeregulationcanbereachedthroughoneoftwopaths:(1)vehicleretrofitsaccordingtoengineyear,or(2)phase‐inschedule.CompliancepathsensurethatbyJanuary2023,nearlyalltrucksandbuseswillhave2010modelyearenginesornewer.


Air Quality



State Tailpipe Emission Standards

Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,onroaddieseltrucks,andharborcraft,ARBestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Newconstructionequipmentusedfortheprogram,includingheavydutytrucksandoffroadconstructionequipment,willberequiredtocomplywiththestandards.

Toxic Air Containment Regulation

Californiaregulatestoxicaircontainments(TACs)primarilythroughtheTannerAirToxicsAct(AssemblyBill[AB]1807)andtheAirToxicsHotSpotsInformationandAssessmentActof1987(AB2588).Intheearly1980s,ARBestablishedastatewidecomprehensiveairtoxicsprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheToxicAirContaminantIdentificationandControlAct(AB1807)createdCalifornia’sprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheAirToxics“HotSpots”InformationandAssessmentAct(AB2588)supplementstheAB1807programbyrequiringastatewideairtoxicsinventory,notificationofpeopleexposedtoasignificanthealthrisk,andfacilityplanstoreducetheserisks.

InAugust1998,ARBidentifieddieselparticulatematter(DPM)emissionsfromdiesel‐fueledenginesasaTAC.InSeptember2000,ARBapprovedacomprehensivedieselriskreductionplantoreduceemissionsfrombothnewandexistingdiesel‐fueledenginesandvehicles(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).ThegoaloftheplanistoreducedieselPM10(respirableparticulatematter)emissionsandtheassociatedhealthriskby75%in2010andby85%by2020.Theplanidentifies14measuresthattargetnewandexistingonroadvehicles(e.g.,heavy‐dutytrucksandbuses),offroadequipment(e.g.,graders,tractors,forklifts,sweepers,andboats),portableequipment(e.g.,pumps),andstationaryengines(e.g.,stand‐bypowergenerators).ARBwillimplementtheplanoverthenextseveralyears.BecausetheARBmeasuresareenactedpriortoconstruction,theprogramwouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicabledieselcontrolmeasures.

TheTannerActsetsforthaformalprocedureforARBtodesignatesubstancesasTACs.Theprocedureentailsresearch,publicparticipation,andscientificpeerreviewbeforeARBdesignatesasubstanceasaTAC.Todate,ARBhasidentified21TACsandhasalsoadoptedEPA’slistofhazardousairpollutants(HAPs)asTACs.InAugust1998,DPMwasaddedtotheARBlistofTACs(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).

TheHotSpotsActrequiresthatexistingfacilitiesthatemittoxicsubstancesabovespecifiedlevelscompletethefollowingsteps.

Prepareatoxicemissioninventory.

Prepareariskassessmentifemissionsaresignificant(i.e.,10tonsperyearorifthetoxicsubstanceisonDistrict’sHealthRiskAssessment[HRA]list).

Notifythepublicofsignificantrisklevels.

Prepareandimplementriskreductionmeasures.

ARBhasadoptedseveralregulationsthatwillreducedieselemissionsfromin‐usevehiclesandenginesthroughoutCalifornia.Forexample,ARBadoptedanidlingregulationforonroaddiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclesinJuly2004andupdateditinOctober2005.TheregulationappliestopublicandprivatelyownedtruckswithaGWRgreaterthan10,000pounds.Vehiclessubjecttotheregulationareprohibitedfromidlingformorethan5minutesinanyonelocation.ARBalsoadopted


Air Quality



aregulationfordiesel‐poweredconstructionandminingvehiclesoperating.Fleetownersaresubjecttoretrofitoracceleratedreplacement/repowerrequirementsforwhichARBmustobtainauthorizationfromEPApriortoenforcement.Theregulationalsoimposesa5‐minuteidlinglimitationonowners,operators,andrentersorlesseesofoffroaddieselvehicles.Insomecases,theparticulatematterreductionstrategiesalsoreducesmog‐formingemissionssuchasNOX.Asanongoingprocess,ARBreviewsaircontaminantsandidentifiesthosethatareclassifiedasTACs.ARBalsocontinuestoestablishnewprogramsandregulationsforthecontrolofTACs,includingDPMs,asappropriate.

Local

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

BAAQMDhaslocalairqualityjurisdictionoverprojectsinAlamedaCounty.BAAQMD’sresponsibilitiesincludeoverseeingstationary‐sourceemissions,approvingpermits,maintainingemissionsinventories,maintainingairqualitystations,overseeingagriculturalburningpermits,andreviewingairquality–relatedsectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsrequiredbyCEQA.BAAQMDisalsoresponsibleforestablishingandenforcinglocalairqualityrulesandregulationsthataddresstherequirementsoffederalandstateairqualitylawsandensuringthattheNAAQSandCAAQSaremet.

TheBAAQMDrulesoutlinedbelowmayapplytotheprogram.AdditionalBAAQMDrulesmayapplyasproject‐specificcomponentsareidentified.

Regulation2,Rule2(NewSourceReview).ThisregulationcontainsrequirementsforBestAvailableControlTechnologyandemissionoffsets.

Regulation2,Rule5(NewSourceReviewofToxicAirContaminants).ThisregulationoutlinesguidanceforevaluatingTACemissionsandtheirpotentialhealthrisks.

Regulation6,Rule1(ParticulateMatter).ThisregulationrestrictsemissionsofPMdarkerthanNo.1ontheRinglemannCharttolessthan3minutesinany1hour.

Regulation7(OdorousSubstances).Thisregulationestablishesgeneralodorlimitationsonodoroussubstancesandspecificemissionlimitationsoncertainodorouscompounds.

Regulation9,Rule8(StationaryInternalCombustionEngines).ThisregulationlimitsemissionsofNOXandCOfromstationaryinternalcombustionenginesofmorethan50horsepower.

TheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrictCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines(BAAQMDGuidelines)provideproceduresforassessingairqualityimpactsandpreparingtheairqualitysectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsunderCEQA.Theguidelinesidentifymethodologiesforpredictingprojectemissionsandimpactsandpresentmeasuresthatcanbeusedtoavoidorreduceairqualityimpacts.AlsooutlinedintheBAAQMDGuidelinesareadvisoryemissionsthresholdsthatthedistricthasadoptedtohelpCEQAleadagenciesdeterminewhetherconstructionandoperationalactivitiesassociatedwithprojectswouldhavesignificantadverseenvironmentalimpacts(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).

InAugust2013,theFirstDistrictCourtofAppealsreversedalowersuperiorcourtrulingthattheBAAQMDneededtocomplywithCEQApriortoadoptingits2010AirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholds,therebyissuingawritofmandateorderingBAAQMDtosetasidethe


Air Quality



thresholdsandceasetheirdisseminationuntilBAAQMDcompliedwithCEQA.However,theAppellatecourtruledthatadoptionoftheguidelinesandthresholdsisnotconsideredaprojectsubjecttoCEQAreview,andadoptionofthesignificancethresholdswasnotarbitraryandcapricious.AsofNovember2013,theBAAQMDhasyettoformallyre‐recommenditsAirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholdsforusebylocalagencies,buttheyarenowauthorizedtodosobytheAppellatecourt.

OtherairqualityplansBAAQMDhasadoptedincludetheBayArea2001OzoneAttainmentPlan(OzonePlan),aimedatreducingozoneandachievingtheNAAQSozonestandard.TheARBpreparedaRedesignationRequest,AttainmentDemonstration,andMaintenancePlanforcarbonmonoxide(CO)in1996thatincludesstrategiestoensurecontinuingattainmentoftheNAAQSforCO;thisplanwassubsequentlyrevisedin1998and2004.In2010,thedistrictalsoadoptedthe2010CleanAirPlan,whichupdatestheOzonePlanandprovidesanintegrated,multi‐pollutantstrategytoimproveairquality,protectpublichealth,andprotecttheclimate.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

SJVAPCDistheregionalairqualityagencywithjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.AlthoughtheprogramareaislocatedwithinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,itisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.BecausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB,theSJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheprogram.However,inordertodiscloseairqualityimpactswithintheSJVAB,thisanalysisincludesdiscussionofpotentialimpactsassociatedwithheavy‐dutytruckemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedwithintheSJVAB.Inaddition,becausetheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsitesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABthroughaprocessknownastransport.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSJVAB(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2009).FordetailedstudiesofpollutanttransportwithinCalifornia,pleaserefertohttp://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/transport/transport.htm.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimated.ProjectemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABareassessedusingsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinSJVAPCD’sGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).

Alameda County General Plan—East County Area Plan

TheECAP,apartoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan,containsairqualitygoalsandpoliciestoaddressairpollutionconcernsintheeasternareaofthecounty.TheECAPairqualitygoalisto“ensurethatairpollutionlevelsdonotthreatenpublichealthandsafety,economicdevelopment,orfuturegrowth”(AlamedaCounty2000:70).TheECAPwaslastrevisedin2000bythevoterinitiativeMeasureD;however,itdidnotresultinanychangestopoliciesregardingairquality.ECAPpoliciesapplicabletotheprogramincludethoselistedbelow(AlamedaCounty2000:70–71).

Policy296:TheCountyshallreviewthecumulativeimpactofproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialeffectonairqualityconditions.

Policy297:TheCountyshallcoordinateairqualityplanningeffortswithotherlocal,regionalandstateagencies.


Air Quality



Policy300:TheCountyshallreviewproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialtogeneratehazardousairpollutants.

Policy302:TheCountyshallincludebufferzoneswithinnewresidentialandsensitivereceptorsiteplanstoseparatethoseusesfromfreeways,arterials,pointsourcesandhazardousmateriallocations.

Policy303:TheCountyshallincorporatetheprovisionsoftheAssociationofBayAreaGovernment's(ABAG)BayAreaAirQualityPlanandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict's(BAAQMD)AirQualityandUrbanDevelopmentGuidelinesintoprojectreviewprocedures.

Policy304:TheCountyshallnotifycitiesandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD)ofproposedprojectswhichmaysignificantlyaffectairquality.

Environmental Setting

Regional Topography, Meteorology, and Climate

Thetopographyoftheprogramareaisdominatedbynorthwest‐southeast‐trendingridgelinesthatreachanelevationofapproximately800to1,400feetabovemeansealevel(msl).Theelevationsofinterveningvalleybottomsintheprogramareaarefromapproximately400to800feetabovemsl.TheclimateoftheSFBAABisdeterminedlargelybyahigh‐pressuresystemthatisalmostalwayspresentovertheeasternPacificOceanoffthewestcoastofNorthAmerica.Highpressuresystemsarecharacterizedbyanupperlayerofdryairthatwarmsasitdescends,whichrestrictsthemobilityofcoolermarine‐influencedairnearthegroundsurfaceandresultsintheformationofsubsidenceinversions.Duringthewinter,thePacifichigh‐pressuresystemshiftssouthward,therebyallowingstormstopassthroughtheregion.Duringsummerandfall,emissionsgeneratedwithintheSFBAABcancombinewithabundantsunshineundertherestraininginfluencesoftopographyandsubsidenceinversionstocreateconditionsthatareconducivetotheformationofphotochemicalpollutants,suchasozone.

Theprogramareaisgenerallywell‐ventilatedbywinds.Winterprevailingwinddirectionsspanthenorth‐northeastthrougheast‐northeastsectors,causedbydrainageoffofthehillsandflowoutoftheAltamontPass.Duringthesummermonths,coldwaterupwellingalongthecoastandhotinlandtemperaturescancauseastrongonshorepressuregradientthattranslatesintoastrong,afternoonwind.BAAQMDoperatesaregionalairqualitymonitoringnetwork;thecloseststationtotheprogramareaistheLivermoreMonitoringStationonRinconAvenueintheCityofLivermore,whichisapproximately9milestothesouth‐southwest.InLivermore,over70%ofthewindisfromthesouth‐southwesttowest‐southwest,andbytheafternoon,35%ofthewindspeedisabout11milesperhour(mph).However,theprogramareatendstobeareceptorofozoneandozoneprecursorsfromSanFrancisco,Alameda,westernandnorthernContraCostaCounty,andSantaClaraCountyand,duringthesummermonths,temperaturestendtobewarm,whichpromotestheformationofozone(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2010).Inturn,theSJVABandtheCentralValleyingeneralthatisdownwindoftheprogramareaalsoisareceptorofthesesamepollutants,accumulat‐ingwithemissionsfromtheTri‐ValleyareaandtosomedegreenorthernContraCostaCountyandsouthernSolanoCounty.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSacramentoregion,theMountainCountiesAirBasin,theNorthCentralCoastAirBasin,theNorthCoastAirBasin,theSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin,andtheSouthCentralCoastAirBasin(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2010).


Air Quality



TemperatureandprecipitationdatacollectedinLivermoreindicatethattheprogramareatypicallyhasaveragemaximumandminimumwinter(i.e.,January)temperaturesof57and37degreesFahrenheit(°F),respectively,whileaveragesummer(i.e.,July)maximumandminimumtemperaturesare89and54°F,respectively.Precipitationintheprogramareaaveragesapproximately14inchesperyear(WesternRegionalClimateCenter2013).

Air Pollutants of Concern

ThefederalgovernmenthasestablishedNAAQS,andthestatehasestablishedCAAQS,respectively,forsixcriteriapollutants:ozone,CO,lead(Pb),nitrogendioxide(NO2),sulfurdioxide(SO2),andPM.

OzoneandNO2areconsideredregionalpollutantsbecausethey(ortheirprecursors)affectairqualityonaregionalscale;NO2reactsphotochemicallywithreactiveorganicgases(ROGs)toformozone,andthisreactionoccursatsomedistancedownwindofthesourceofpollutants.PollutantssuchasCO,SO2,andPbareconsideredtobelocalpollutantsthattendtoaccumulateintheairlocally.PMisconsideredtobealocalaswellasaregionalpollutant.

Theprimarypollutantsofconcerninthestudyareaareozone(includingnitrogenoxides[NOX]),CO,andPM.Principalcharacteristicssurroundingthesepollutantsarediscussedbelow.TACsarealsodiscussed,althoughnoairqualitystandardsexistforthesepollutants.

Ozone

Ozoneisarespiratoryirritantthatcancausesevereear,nose,andthroatirritationandincreasesusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfections.Itisalsoanoxidantthatcancauseextensivedamagetoplantsthroughleafdiscolorationandcelldamage.Itcancausesubstantialdamagetoothermaterialsaswell,suchassyntheticrubberandtextiles.

Ozoneisnotemitteddirectlyintotheairbutisformedbyaphotochemicalreactionintheatmosphere.Ozoneprecursors—ROGandNOX—reactintheatmosphereinthepresenceofsunlighttoformozone.Becausephotochemicalreactionratesdependontheintensityofultravioletlightandairtemperature,ozoneisprimarilyasummerairpollutionproblem.Theozoneprecursors,ROGandNOX,aremainlyemittedbymobilesourcesandbystationarycombustionequipment.

Hydrocarbonsareorganicgasesthataremadeupofhydrogenandcarbonatoms.Thereareseveralsubsetsoforganicgases,includingROGsandvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs).ROGsaredefinedbystaterulesandregulations;VOCsaredefinedbyfederalrulesandregulations.Forthepurposesofthisassessment,hydrocarbonsareclassifiedandreferredtoasROGs.BothROGsandVOCsareemittedfromtheincompletecombustionofhydrocarbonsorothercarbon‐basedfuelsorasaproductofchemicalprocesses.Themajorsourcesofhydrocarbonsarecombustionengineexhaust,oilrefineries,andoil‐fueledpowerplants;othercommonsourcesarepetroleumfuels,solvents,dry‐cleaningsolutions,andpaint(throughevaporation).

Thehealtheffectsofhydrocarbonsresultfromtheformationofozone.Highlevelsofhydrocarbonsintheatmospherecaninterferewithoxygenintakebyreducingtheamountofavailableoxygenthoughdisplacement.CarcinogenicformsofhydrocarbonsareconsideredTACs.TherearenoseparatehealthstandardsforROGs,althoughsomearealsotoxic;forexample,benzeneisbothaROGandacarcinogen.


Air Quality



Nitrogen Oxides

Nitrogenoxidesareafamilyofhighlyreactivegasesthatareaprimaryprecursortotheformationofground‐levelozoneandreactintheatmospheretoformacidrain.Nitrogendioxide,oftenusedinterchangeablywithNOX,isabrownish,highlyreactivegasthatispresentinallurbanenvironments.ThemajorhumansourcesofNO2arecombustiondevices,suchasboilers,gasturbines,andmobileandstationaryreciprocatinginternalcombustionengines.Combustiondevicesemitprimarilynitricoxide(NO),whichreactsthroughoxidationintheatmospheretoformNO2(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013a).ThecombinedemissionsofNOandNO2arereferredtoasNOXandreportedasequivalentNO2.BecauseNO2isformedanddepletedbyreactionsassociatedwithozone,theNO2concentrationinaparticulargeographicalareamaynotberepresentativeoflocalNOXemissionsources.

InhalationisthemostcommonrouteofexposuretoNO2.BecauseNO2hasrelativelylowsolubilityinwater,theprincipalsiteoftoxicityisinthelowerrespiratorytract.Theseverityoftheadversehealtheffectsprimarilydependsontheconcentrationinhaledratherthanthedurationofexposure.Anindividualmayexperienceavarietyofacutesymptoms,suchascoughing,difficultybreathing,vomiting,headache,andeyeirritationduringorshortlyafterexposure.Afteraperiodofapproximately4to12hours,anexposedindividualmayexperiencechemicalpneumonitisorpulmonaryedemawithbreathingabnormalities,cough,cyanosis,chestpain,andrapidheartbeat.SeveresymptomaticNO2intoxicationafteracuteexposurehasbeenlinkedtoprolongedrespiratoryimpairment,withsuchsymptomsasemphysema,bronchitis,andaggravatingexistingheatdisease(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013b).

Carbon Monoxide

CarbonMonoxide(CO),acolorlessandodorlessgas,interfereswiththetransferofoxygentothebrain.Itcancausedizzinessandfatigueandcanimpaircentralnervoussystemfunctions.COisemittedalmostexclusivelyfromtheincompletecombustionoffossilfuels.Inurbanareas,motorvehicles,powerplants,refineries,industrialboilers,ships,aircraft,andtrainsemitCO.AutomobileexhaustreleasesmostoftheCOinurbanareas.COisanonreactiveairpollutantthatdissipatesrelativelyquickly,soambientCOconcentrationsgenerallyfollowthespatialandtemporaldistributionsofvehiculartraffic.COconcentrationsareinfluencedbylocalmeteorologicalconditions—primarilywindspeed,topography,andatmosphericstability.COfrommotorvehicleexhaustcanbecomelocallyconcentratedwhensurface‐basedtemperatureinversionsarecombinedwithcalmatmosphericconditions,atypicalsituationatduskinurbanareasbetweenNovemberandFebruary.BecausemotorvehiclesarethedominantsourceofCOemissions,COhotspotsarenormallylocatednearroadsandfreewayswithhightrafficvolume.

Particulate Matter

Particulatematterpollutionconsistsofverysmallliquidandsolidparticlesfloatingintheair,whichcanincludesmoke,soot,dust,salts,acids,andmetals.PMalsoformswhengasesemittedfromindustriesandmotorvehiclesundergochemicalreactionsintheatmosphere.Particulatematterlessthan10micronsindiameter,about1/7thethicknessofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM10.Particulatematterthatis2.5micronsorlessindiameter,roughly1/28thediameterofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM2.5.MajorsourcesofPM10includemotorvehicles;woodburningstovesandfireplaces;dustfromconstruction,landfills,andagriculture;wildfiresandbrush/wasteburning;industrialsources;windblowndustfromopenlands;andatmosphericchemicalandphotochemicalreactions.PM2.5resultsfromfuelcombustion(frommotorvehicles,powergeneration,and


Air Quality



industrialfacilities),residentialfireplaces,andwoodstoves.Inaddition,PM10andPM2.5canbeformedintheatmospherefromgasessuchasSO2,NOX,andVOCs.

PM10andPM2.5poseagreaterhealthriskthanlarger‐sizeparticles.Wheninhaled,thesetinyparticlescanpenetratethehumanrespiratorysystem’snaturaldefensesanddamagetherespiratorytract.PM10andPM2.5canincreasethenumberandseverityofasthmaattacks,causeoraggravatebronchitisandotherlungdiseases,andreducethebody’sabilitytofightinfections.Verysmallparticlesofsubstances,suchaslead,sulfates,andnitrates,cancauselungdamagedirectly.Thesesubstancescanbeabsorbedintothebloodstreamandcausedamageelsewhereinthebody;theycanalsotransportabsorbedgasessuchaschloridesorammoniumintothelungsandcauseinjury.Whereasparticles2.5to10micronsindiametertendtocollectintheupperportionoftherespiratorysystem,particles2.5micronsorlessaresotinythattheycanpenetratedeeperintothelungsanddamagelungtissues.Suspendedparticulatesalsodamageanddiscolorsurfacesonwhichtheysettle,andcontributetohazeandreduceregionalvisibility.

Toxic Air Contaminants

AlthoughNAAQSandCAAQSexistforcriteriapollutants,noambientstandardsexistforTACs.ManypollutantsareidentifiedasTACsbecauseoftheirpotentialtoincreasetheriskofdevelopingcancerorotheracute(short‐term)orchronic(long‐term)healthproblems.ForTACsthatareknownorsuspectedcarcinogens,ARBhasconsistentlyfoundthattherearenolevelsorthresholdsbelowwhichexposureisriskfree.IndividualTACsvarygreatlyintheriskstheypresent;atagivenlevelofexposure,oneTACmayposeahazardthatismanytimesgreaterthananother.ForcertainTACs,aunitriskfactorcanbedevelopedtoevaluatecancerrisk.Foracuteandchronichealtheffects,asimilarfactor,calledaHazardIndex,isusedtoevaluaterisk.TACsareidentifiedandtheirtoxicityisstudiedbytheCaliforniaOfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment(OEHHA).ExamplesofTACsourcesincludeindustrialprocesses,drycleaners,gasolinestations,paintandsolventoperations,andfossilfuelcombustionsources.

Sulfur Oxides

Sulfuroxidesareanyofseveralcompoundsofsulfurandoxygen,ofwhichthemostrelevanttoairqualityisSO2.SO2isarespiratoryirritantthatcausesthebronchiolestoconstrictwithinhalationat5partspermillion(ppm)ormore.Oncontactwiththemoistmucousmembranes,SO2producessulfurousacid,whichisadirectirritant.Concentrationratherthandurationoftheexposureisanimportantdeterminantofrespiratoryeffects.ExposuretohighSO2concentrationsmayresultinedemaofthelungsorglottisandrespiratoryparalysis.SO2isproducedbycoalandoilcombustionandsuchstationarysourcesassteelmills,refineries,andpulpandpapermills.

Lead

Lead(Pb)isametalthatisanaturalconstituentofair,water,andthebiosphere.Leadisneithercreatednordestroyedintheenvironment,soitpersistsforever.Leadwasusedseveraldecadesagotoincreasetheoctaneratinginautomotivefuel;therefore,gasoline‐poweredautomobileengineswereamajorsourceofairbornelead.Sincetheuseofleadedfuelhasbeenmostlyphasedout,theambientconcentrationsofleadhavedroppeddramatically.

Short‐termexposuretohighlevelsofleadcancausevomiting,diarrhea,convulsions,coma,orevendeath.However,evensmallamountsofleadcanbeharmful,especiallytoinfants,youngchildren,andpregnantwomen.Leadexposureismostseriousforyoungchildrenbecausetheyabsorblead


Air Quality



moreeasilythanadultsandaremoresusceptibletoitsharmfuleffects.Evenlow‐levelexposuremayharmtheintellectualdevelopment,behavior,size,andhearingofinfants.Duringpregnancy,especiallyinthelasttrimester,leadcanadverselyaffectthefetus.Femaleworkersexposedtohighlevelsofleadhavemoremiscarriagesandstillbirths.

Symptomsoflong‐termexposuretolowerleadlevelsmaybelessnoticeablebutarestillserious.Anemiaiscommon,anddamagetothenervoussystemmaycauseimpairedmentalfunction.Othersymptomsareappetiteloss,abdominalpain,constipation,fatigue,sleeplessness,irritability,andheadache.Continuedexcessiveexposure,asinanindustrialsetting,canaffectthekidneys.

Diesel Particulate Matter

In1998,ARBidentifiedDPMasatoxicaircontaminant(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).Onastatewidebasis,theaveragepotentialcancerriskassociatedwithDPMismorethan500potentialcasespermillionpeople.TheOEHHAestimatedthepotentialcancerriskfroma70‐yearexposuretoDPMataconcentrationof1microgrampercubicmeter(µg/m3)rangesfrom130to2,400excesscancercasespermillionpeople.Ascientificreviewpanelconcludedthatanappropriatepointestimateofunitriskfora70‐yearexposuretoDPMis300excesscancercasespermillionpeople(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).

TheDPMofgreatesthealthconcernarethoseinthecategoriesoffine(PM10)andultra‐fine(PM2.5).Thesefineandultra‐fineparticlesmaybecomposedofelementalcarbonwithadsorbedcompounds,suchasorganiccompounds,sulfate,nitrate,metals,andothertraceelements.Thefineandultra‐fineparticlesarerespirable,whichmeansthattheycanavoidmanyofthehumanrespiratorysystemdefensemechanismsandenterdeeplyintothelungs.

Existing Air Quality Conditions

Existingairqualityconditionsinthestudyareacanbecharacterizedbymonitoringdatacollectedintheregion.ThoughtheLivermore–793RinconAvenuemonitoringstationisthecloseststationtotheprogramarea,thismonitoringstationdoesnotreportCOorPM10conditionsinthearea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorCOistheFremont–ChapelWaymonitoringstationlocatedapproximately20mileswestandmostlyupwindoftheprogramarea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorPM10istheTracy–Airportmonitoringstationlocatedapproximately12mileseastoftheprogramareainSanJoaquinCounty.RecentairqualitymonitoringresultsfromthesestationsaresummarizedinTable3.3‐2.Thedatarepresentairqualitymonitoringforthelast3yearsforwhichacompletedatasetisavailable(2010–2012).AsindicatedinTable3.3‐2,therehavebeensomeviolationsofstateandfederalairqualitystandardsduringthistimeperiodforozoneandPM2.5.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐2. Summary of 2010‐2012 Ambient Air Quality in the Program Area Vicinity

PollutantStandards 2010 2011 2012

Ozone(O3)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Maximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.150 0.115 0.102

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hourstandard(>0.09ppm) 3 3 2

Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.098 0.085 0.090

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>0.070ppm) 6 9 4

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>0.075ppm) 3 2 3

Carbonmonoxide(CO)—Fremont–ChapelWay

Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.94 – –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>9ppm) 0 0 0

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>9.0ppm) 0 0 0

NitrogenDioxide(NO2)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Statemaximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.058 0.057 0.043

Annualaverageconcentration(ppm) 0.011 0.011 –

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hour(0.18ppm) 0 0 0

Particulatematter(PM10)—Tracy–Airport

Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 28.5 110.8 73.4

Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) – – –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>150g/m3)g 0 0 0

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS24‐hour(>50g/m3)g – – –

Particulatematter(PM2.5)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 45.4 31.1

Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 23.6 –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>35g/m3) 0 2 0

Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013b.ppm = partspermillion.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.NAAQS = NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.– = datanotavailable.a Anexceedanceisnotnecessarilyaviolation.Thisisamathematicalestimateofhowmanydaysconcentrationswouldhavebeenmeasuredashigherthanthelevelofthestandardhadeachdaybeenmonitored.Valueshavebeenrounded.

b Measurementsusuallyarecollectedevery6days.c Statecriteriaforensuringthatdataaresufficientlycompleteforcalculatingvalidannualaveragesaremorestringentthanthenationalcriteria.


Air Quality



Attainment Status

Localmonitoringdata(Table3.3‐2)areusedtodesignateareasasnonattainment,maintenance,attainment,orunclassifiedfortheNAAQSandCAAQS.Thefourdesignationsaredefinedasfollows.

Nonattainment—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsconsistentlyviolatethestandardinquestion.

Maintenance—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsexceededthestandardinquestioninthepastbutarenolongerinviolationofthatstandard.

Attainment—assignedtoareaswherepollutantconcentrationsmeetthestandardinquestionoveradesignatedperiodoftime.

Unclassified—assignedtoareasweredataareinsufficienttodeterminewhetherapollutantisviolatingthestandardinquestion.

Table3.3‐3summarizestheattainmentstatusofAlamedaCountywithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS.Table3.3‐4summarizestheattainmentstatusoftheSJVABwithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2013).

Table 3.3‐3. Federal and State Attainment Status for Alameda County

CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation

O3(1‐hour) (Nofederalstandard)a SeriousNonattainment

O3(8‐hour) MarginalNonattainment(2008) Nonattainment

CO Maintenance Attainment

PM10 Attainment Nonattainment

PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment

NO2 Attainment Attainment

SO2 Attainment Attainment

Lead Attainment(2008) Attainment

Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedSources:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2011;U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2012.O3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.a Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillion(pphm)wasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedherebecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandbecausethisbenchmarkisaddressedinthestateimplementationplans.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐4. Federal and State Attainment Status for San Joaquin Valley

CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation

O3(1‐hour) (NoFederalStandard) SevereNonattainment

O3(8‐hour) ExtremeNonattainment Nonattainment

CO Attainment Attainment

PM10 Attainment Nonattainment

PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment

NO2 Attainment Attainment

SO2 Attainment Attainment

Lead NoDesignation Attainment

Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedO3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.

Sensitive Receptors

Forthepurposesofairqualityanalysis,sensitivelandusesaredefinedaslocationswherehumanpopulations,especiallychildren,seniors,andsickpersonsarelocatedandwherethereisreasonableexpectationofcontinuoushumanexposureaccordingtotheaveragingperiodfortheairqualitystandards(e.g.,24‐hour,8‐hour,and1‐hour).Typicalsensitivereceptorsincluderesidences,hospitals,andschools.WhiletheprogramareaislocatedintheruralsettingoftheAltamontPass,sensitivereceptorsintheprogramareavicinityincludescatteredresidencesthroughoutandadjacenttotheprogramarea.AsindicatedinChapter2ofthisPEIR,ProgramDescription,AlamedaCountyhasestablishedsetbackrequirementsforsitingturbineswithincertaintypesoflanduses(e.g.,residential,commercial,recreational),andinfrastructure(publicroads),andturbineswouldnotbelocatedwithinthesesetbackdistances.Outsidetheprogramarea,approximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaisacommunityofsinglefamilyresidencesinthecityofLivermore,and5,000feettotheeastisthecommunityofMountainHouse,whichcontainssinglefamilyresidences,threeelementaryschoolsandchildcarefacilities,andpublicparksandopenspaces.

3.3.2 Environmental Impacts

Methods for Analysis

Criteriapollutantemissionswereestimatedforconstructionandoperationalactivitiesataprogrammaticlevelwithadditionaldetailgiventotwospecificrepoweringprojects,theGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects,whichfallwithintheprogramarea.Emissionswerecalculatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectusingprojectdatafromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).Thiswasdonebecauseproject‐specificinformationfortheproposedprojectswasverylimited,andtherepoweringactivitiesarenotyet


Air Quality



determined.BecausetheVascoexampleprovidesacomprehensiveanalysisoftypicalconstructionactivityforrepowering,itwasusedtoestimatetotalanddailyemissionsfortheproposedprojects,asitisconsideredrepresentativeofatypicalprojectassociatedwiththeprogram.TotalemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerethenscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramarea.Thescalingfactorsfortotalconstructionemissionsareasfollows:5.21forprogramAlternative1:417MW(416.5MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);5.63forprogramAlternative2:450MW(450MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);1.11fortheGoldenHillsProject(88.4MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);and0.25forthePattersonPassProject(19.8MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).AnnualconstructionemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerealsoscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsusingamaximumannualnameplatecapacityof100MWinstalled.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25toestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2(100MWmaximum÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).SincethenameplatecapacityoftheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsarelessthan100MW,itwasassumedthatallemissionsfromtheseprojectswouldoccurduringonecalendaryear.

Constructionemissionswereestimatedforeachphaseofconstructionforthreemajorcontributors:offroadequipment,onroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes),andconcretebatchplantoperations.Calculationmethodsfromthefollowingsourceswereusedtoestimateemissions:theCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Additionalstandardemissionfactors,conversionfactors,andmethodswereusedtoestimateemissionsperstandardairqualityprotocolconsistentwithBAAQMDguidance.

Operationalemissionswereestimatedforoffroadequipment(maintenance/operationactivities)andonroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes).Calculationmethodsfromthesamesourcesaslistedaboveforconstructionemissionswereusedtoestimateoperationalemissions.

Theconcretebatchplantwouldproducefugitivedustemissionsduringthemanufactureofconcrete.Approximately0.0157poundsofPM10wouldbeemittedpercubicyardofconcreteproduced(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995c).ItwasassumedthatPM2.5represents0.674%ofPM10(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2006).Stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedbecausespecificdataonthetypesofequipment(generators,engines,etc.)thatwouldbeusedatthebatchplantswerenotavailable.Inaddition,thebatchplantsarepermittedsourcesunderBAAQMDandemissionswouldbeminorafterrequiredairdistrictBestAvailableControlTechnologies(BACTs)andoffsets.

Importantassumptions(associatedwiththe80MWprojectexample)usedintheanalysisarepresentedbelow.

Emissionswereestimatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectandscaledtotheprogram,GoldenHillsProject,andPattersonPassProjectbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.


Air Quality



Fortheprogramalternatives,themaximumannualnameplatecapacityinstalledis100MW.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25foremissionsfromthe80MWprojectVascoexampletoestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2.

Offroadequipmenttypes,fueltypes,andphasing(daysofconstructionforeachconstructionphaseforeachmonthoftheyear)forconstructionandoperationalactivitiesweretakenfromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).

Constructionactivitywilloccur8hoursperday,5daysperweek.

FugitivedustemissionsfromgradingarecalculatedforgradersandbulldozersusingCalEEModmethods,whichcalculateemissionsonaper‐milebasisforgradersandaper‐hourbasisforbulldozers.Eachgradertravelsatanaveragespeedof7.1mphwithabladewidthof12feettocover292totalacresforatotalmileageofgradingof201miles(8.3milesaverageperday).Eachbulldozeroperates8hoursperdayduringconstruction.

Therewillbe10,800annual(55averagedaily)light‐dutytrucktrips,16,605annual(85averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsformaterialdeliveryandremoval,and6,338annual(33averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsforwaterdelivery(watertankers).

Eachlight‐dutytripwillinclude1.0mileof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and23milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof25miles.

Eachheavy‐dutytripwillinclude5.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and29milesof55mphtravel(freeway)foratotalroundtripdistanceof35miles.Eachwatertankertrucktripwouldinclude6.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and19milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof26miles.

Workercommuteroundtripsare25miles;workervehiclestravelatanaverageof55mph.Therewillbe16,790annual(86averagedailyand150maximumdaily)workercommutetripsforconstructionand2,226annual(8.5averagedaily)workercommutetripsforoperation.

Approximately3,500cubicyardsofconcretewillbeproducedattheconcretebatchplantsperyear(55cubicyardsonaverageperday).

Determination of Significance

InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,programAlternative1,programAlternative2,theGoldenHillsproject,orthePattersonPassprojectwouldbenormallyconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectifitwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.

Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan.

Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation.

Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprogramorprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors).


Air Quality



Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.

Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople

AccordingtotheStateCEQAGuidelines,thesignificancecriteriaestablishedbytheapplicableairqualitymanagementorairpollutioncontroldistrictmaybereliedontomakesignificancedeterminationsforpotentialimpactsonenvironmentalresources.Consequently,theanalysisusedinthisdocumentusesmethodologiesprovidedintheupdatedBAAQMDGuidelines(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2012).Althoughthe2010BAAQMDGuidelinesandtheir2011updatehavebeenchallengedincourt,andBAAQMDhasremovedallreferencesofthe2010/2011adoptedthresholdsfromthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines,the2010/2011BAAQMDGuidelinescontainquantitativesignificancethresholdsforproject‐relatedconstructionexhaustemissionsandoperationalemissions.Becausethe2010/2011thresholdsaremorestringentandcomprehensivethanthe1999thresholds(asrecommendedforuseinthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines),the2010/2011thresholdsareusedtodeterminesignificanceforconstructionandoperationalactivities(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).Therearenoquantitativethresholdsforconstructionimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedust,sotheseimpactsareaddressedusingapplicableBAAQMD‐recommendedmitigationmeasuresfordustabatement.

Underthe2010/2011BAAQMDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedBAAQMD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐5.

Table 3.3‐5. BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance

Pollutant Construction Operations

ROG 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

NOX 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

CO – ViolationofCAAQS

PM10(total) – –

PM10(exhaust) 82lbs/day 82lbs/dayor15tons/year

PM2.5(exhaust) 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

PM10/PM2.5(fugitivedust)

BMPs –

TACs(project‐level) Increasedcancerriskof10in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan1.0(hazardindex[HI]);PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.3microgramspercubicmeter

Sameasconstruction

TACs(cumulative) Increasedcancerriskof100in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan10.0;PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.8microgrampercubicmeteratreceptorswithin1,000feet

Sameasconstruction

Odors – Fivecomplaintsperyearaveragedover3years

Source:BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011.lbs = pounds.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.BMPs = bestmanagementpractices.


Air Quality



Bothaveragedailyandmaximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheproject,andmaximumdailyemissionswerecomparedtothedailythresholdslistedinTable3.3‐5,pertherecommendationofBAAQMDstaff(Kirkpers.comm.).

ForprojectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5,thenitwouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.Indevelopingthresholdsofsignificanceforairpollutants,BAAQMDconsideredtheemissionlevelsforwhichaproject’sindividualemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable.Therefore,ifaprojectwouldexceedtheproject‐levelsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinTable3.3‐5,itsemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable;ifaprojectwouldnotexceedthesignificancethresholds,itsemissionswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.

InadditiontoemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,theportionofequipmentandmaterialhaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantified.Inaddition,theSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandmayreceivesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABduetotransport.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.

SJVAPCD’spublishedguidelines,GuideforAssessingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),donotrequirethequantificationofconstructionemissions.Rather,itrequiresimplementationofeffectiveandcomprehensivefeasiblecontrolmeasurestoreducePM10emissions(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).SJVAPCDconsidersPM10emissionstobethegreatestpollutantofconcernwhenassessingconstruction‐relatedairqualityimpactsandhasdeterminedthatcompliancewithitsRegulationVIII,includingimplementationofallfeasiblecontrolmeasuresspecifiedinitsguidancemanual(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),constitutessufficientmitigationtoreduceconstruction‐relatedPM10emissionstoless‐than‐significantlevelsandminimizeadverseairqualityeffects.AllconstructionprojectsmustabidebyRegulationVIII.Sincethepublicationofthedistrict’sguidancemanual,thedistricthasrevisedsomeoftherulescomprisingRegulationVIII.GuidancefromdistrictstaffindicatesthatimplementationofadustcontrolplanwouldsatisfyalloftherequirementsofRegulationVIII(Siongpers.comm.).FurtherconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaffindicatesthat,thoughexplicitthresholdsforconstruction‐relatedemissionsofozoneprecursorsarenotenumeratedintheguidancemanual,SJVAPCDconsidersasignificantimpacttooccurwhenconstructionemissionsofROGorNOXexceed10tonsperyearorifPM10orPM2.5emissionsexceed15tonsperyear(Siongpers.comm.).

SJVAPCD’sthresholdsofsignificanceusedinthisanalysis,asindicatedinitsGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002)andthroughconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaff,aresummarizedbelow.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearROG.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearNOX.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM10.


Air Quality



Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM2.5

SJVAPCDdoesnothaveestablishedquantitativeCEQAthresholdsforconstructionactivities.Therefore,inlieuofCEQAsignificancethresholdsforconstructionemissions,estimatedemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedbytheproposedprojectsundertheprogramintheSJVABarecomparedtoSJVAPCD’soperationalCEQAthresholdof10tonsperyearforbothNOXandROGand15tonsperyearforbothPM10andPM2.5(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).UndertheSJVAPCDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedSJVAPCD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐6.

Table 3.3‐6. SJVAPCD Thresholds of Significance

Pollutant Construction Operations

ROG – 10tons/year

NOX – 10tons/year

CO – ViolationofCAAQS

PM10(total) – 15tons/year

PM2.5(total) – 15tons/year

Sources:SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002;Siongpers.comm.CAAQS=CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.

Impacts and Mitigation Measures

ImpactAQ‐1a‐1:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)

Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative1doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative1wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative1wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative1’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative1constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐1),Alternative1wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative1wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative1becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.


Air Quality



Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐1a‐2:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)

Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative2doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative2wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative2wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative2’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative2constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐2),Alternative2wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative2wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative2becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.


ImpactAQ‐1b:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.TheGoldenHillsProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromGoldenHillsProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2b),theGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.


Air Quality



ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.


ImpactAQ‐1c:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,thePattersonPassProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.ThePattersonPassProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromPattersonPassProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2c),thePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Accordingly,thePattersonPassProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.


ImpactAQ‐2a‐1:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)

Construction Activities

Basedontheassumptionspresentedabove,constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogramwouldoccuroveraperiodof9monthsperyearforapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesattheprogramareawouldbeassociatedwithdecommissioningandfoundationremovalofexistingturbinesites;laydown,substations,andswitchyards;roadconstruction;turbinefoundationsandbatchplantoperation;turbinedeliveryandinstallation;utilitycollectorlineinstallation;andrestorationandclean‐up.Eachoftheseactivitieswouldoccuroverperiodsthatwouldrangefromapproximately2to4months.Itisestimatedthatasmanyas90piecesofoffroadconstructionequipment,includingcranes,excavators,graders,loaders,cementtrucks,anddozers,wouldberequiredforanaverageof8hoursperdaytoconstructvarious


Air Quality



projectsundertheprogram.Atanygiventime,from6to54piecesofconstructionequipmentwouldbeoperatingconcurrently,dependingontheconstructionphasing.

Inadditiontotheoffroadequipment,onroadvehicletripswouldberequiredtodelivermaterialsandequipmenttotheconstructionsitesaswellastotransportworkerstoandfromtheconstructionsites(seeChapter2,ProgramDescription,TrafficandParkingsection).Itisanticipatedthatanaverageofapproximately140trucktripsand86commutingworkertripswouldberequiredperdayduringthe9‐monthconstructionperiodforeachyear.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker–relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCDannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).

Table 3.3‐7. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total

PM2.5Total

Offsitetrucktrips 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24

Totalemissions 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24

SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15

Significantimpact? No No No No No No

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogram.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.AsdiscussedaboveunderMethodsforAnalysis,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingtheCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Maximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheperiodoftimewherethegreatestconstructionactivityisanticipatedtooccur.Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐8. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions


EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

17.02 142.72 53.05 0.19 4.98 7.19 4.94 0.32

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 16.01 135.03 59.27 0.19 4.80 46.34 4.75 14.66

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

26.74 226.40 96.79 0.31 7.94 24.84 7.82 20.16

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 6.12 124.94 31.85 0.39 3.13 1.20 2.88 0.44

Offsiteworkertrips 0.33 1.49 10.84 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.10

Totalemissions 66.22 630.59 251.79 1.20 20.87 79.84 20.40 35.69

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

SignificantImpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyprogram‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Withregardtofugitivedustemissions,theBAAQMDGuidelinesfocusonimplementationofdustcontrolmeasuresratherthancomparingestimatedlevelsoffugitivedusttoquantitativesignificancethresholds.NewandmorecomprehensivefugitivedustcontrolmeasureshavebeenidentifiedbyBAAQMDinits2012guidelines.Therefore,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,


Air Quality



whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.

IndividualprojectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11.

Table 3.3‐9. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity



PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


Maintenance/operation 3.38 28.05 12.52 0.04 1.15 0.73 1.14 0.04

Totalemissions 3.41 28.18 13.48 0.05 1.15 0.76 1.15 0.05


Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐10. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)


PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust



Totalemissions 0.08 0.61 0.54 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00




Air Quality



Table 3.3‐11. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions


EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)


PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


17.02 114.18 53.05 0.19 2.74 3.24 2.72 0.15


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



26.74 181.12 96.79 0.31 4.37 11.18 4.30 9.07

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00





Totalemissions 66.22 529.76 251.79 1.20 12.89 36.73 12.52 16.36


Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No



Operational Activities

Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theprogramwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprogramarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobethesameundertheprogramasunderexistingcondition;consequently,theywouldnotresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐10.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.

Allexposedsurfaces(e.g.,parkingareas,stagingareas,soilpiles,gradedareas,andunpavedaccessroads)willbewateredasneededtomaintaindustcontrolonsite—approximatelytwotimesperday.


Air Quality



Allhaultruckstransportingsoil,sand,orotherloosematerialoffsitewillbecovered.

Allvisiblemudordirttrack‐outontoadjacentpublicroadswillberemovedusingwetpowervacuumstreetsweepersatleastonceperday.Theuseofdrypowersweepingisprohibited.

Allvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadswillbelimitedto15mph.

Allroadways,driveways,andsidewalkstobepavedwillbecompletedassoonaspossible.Buildingpadswillbelaidassoonaspossibleaftergradingunlessseedingorsoilbindersareused.

Idlingtimeswillbeminimizedeitherbyshuttingequipmentoffwhennotinuseorreducingthemaximumidlingtimeto5minutes(asrequiredbytheCaliforniaairbornetoxicscontrolmeasureTitle13,Section2485ofCaliforniaCodeofRegulations[CCR]).Clearsignagewillbeprovidedforconstructionworkersatallaccesspoints.

Allconstructionequipmentwillbemaintainedandproperlytunedinaccordancewithmanufacturer’sspecifications.Allequipmentwillbecheckedbyacertifiedvisibleemissionsevaluator.

Postapubliclyvisiblesignwiththetelephonenumberandpersontocontactattheleadagencyregardingdustcomplaints.Thispersonwillrespondandtakecorrectiveactionwithin48hours.Theairdistrict’sphonenumberwillalsobevisibletoensurecompliancewithapplicableregulations.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.

Duringconstructionactivities,allexposedsurfaceswillbewateredatafrequencyadequatetomeetandmaintainfugitivedustcontrolrequirementsofallrelevantairqualitymanagemententities.

Allexcavation,grading,and/ordemolitionactivitieswillbesuspendedwhenaveragewindspeedsexceed20mph,asmeasuredattheLivermoreMunicipalAirport.

Windbreaks(e.g.,trees,fences)willbeinstalledonthewindwardside(s)ofactivelydisturbedareasofconstruction.Windbreaksshouldhaveatmaximum50%airporosity.

Vegetativegroundcover(e.g.,fast‐germinatingnativegrassseed)willbeplantedindisturbedareasassoonaspossibleandwateredappropriatelyuntilvegetationisestablished.

Iffeasibleandpracticable,thesimultaneousoccurrenceofexcavation,grading,andground‐disturbingconstructionactivitiesonthesameareaatanyonetimewillbelimited.

Constructionvehiclesandmachinery,includingtheirtires,willbecleanedpriortoleavingtheconstructionareatoremovevegetationandsoil.Cleaningstationswillbeestablishedattheperimeteroftheconstructionarea.


Air Quality



Siteaccessestoadistanceof100feetfromthepavedroadwillbetreatedwitha6to12inchcompactedlayerofwoodchips,mulch,orgravel.

Sandbagsorothererosioncontrolmeasureswillbeinstalledtopreventsiltrunofftopublicroadwaysfromsiteswithaslopegreaterthan1%.

Theidlingtimeofdieselpoweredconstructionequipmentwillbeminimizedto2minutes.

Theprojectwilldevelopaplandemonstratingthattheoffroadequipment(morethan50horsepower)tobeusedintheconstructionproject(i.e.,owned,leased,andsubcontractorvehicles)wouldachieveaprojectwidefleet‐average20%NOXreductionand45%PMreductioncomparedtothemostrecentARBfleetaverage.Acceptableoptionsforreducingemissionsincludetheuseoflatemodelengines,low‐emissiondieselproducts,alternativefuels,engineretrofittechnology,after‐treatmentproducts,add‐ondevicessuchasparticulatefilters,and/orotheroptionsassuchbecomeavailable.

UselowVOC(i.e.,ROG)coatingsbeyondthelocalrequirements(i.e.,Regulation8,Rule3:ArchitecturalCoatings).

Allconstructionequipment,dieseltrucks,andgeneratorswillbeequippedwithBACTforemissionreductionsofNOXandPM.

AllcontractorswilluseequipmentthatmeetsARB’smostrecentcertificationstandardforoffroadheavydutydieselengines.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalROGorNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalROGandNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsintheSJVABshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdsandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.

ImpactAQ‐2a‐2:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)


ConstructionofprogramAlternative2wouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsasAlternative1.ItwasassumedthatthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative2wouldnotdifferfromthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative1,althoughtheperiodofconstructionwouldbeslightlylongeroverall.

Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaust


Air Quality



emissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofprogramAlternative2.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABareanticipatedtobeexactlythesameasforalternative1andarepresentedinTable3.3‐8above.Thisisbecausedailyconstructionactivityisanticipatedtobethesameforbothalternatives.Theonlydifferenceinemissionsforthesealternativesistotalemissionsoverthecourseoftheentireconstructionperiod,sinceAlternative1willbeunderconstructionforapproximately50monthsandAlternative2willbeunderconstructionforapproximately54months.

Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8above,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7above,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginalessthansignificantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprogramareaandsomeemissionsthatareemittedintheprogramareawithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.

ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,


Air Quality



mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11above.


Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9above;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐11above.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐2b:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)


ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.

Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaul


Air Quality



tripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐12).

Table 3.3‐12. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB— Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions




PM2.5Total


Totalemissions 0.25 8.58 1.32 0.01 0.28 0.22



CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionoftheGoldenHillsProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐13.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

Table 3.3‐13. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissionswithin the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions




PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


15.05 126.17 46.89 0.17 4.40 6.36 4.36 0.29


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



23.63 200.14 85.56 0.28 7.02 21.96 6.92 17.83





Air Quality



ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)



Totalemissions 58.53 557.44 222.59 1.07 18.45 70.58 18.04 31.55





AsindicatedinTable3.3‐13,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐12,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.


ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐14through3.3‐16.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐14. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity



PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust



Totalemissions 3.02 24.91 11.92 0.04 1.02 0.67 1.01 0.04



Table 3.3‐15. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB— Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity



PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust



Totalemissions 0.07 0.54 0.48 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00



Table 3.3‐16. Golden Hills Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions




PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


15.05 100.93 46.89 0.17 2.42 2.86 2.40 0.13


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



23.63 160.11 85.56 0.28 3.86 9.88 3.80 8.02







Air Quality






PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Totalemissions 58.53 468.31 222.59 1.07 11.40 32.47 11.07 14.46




a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants


Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐14;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐15.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐16).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐12,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐2c:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)


ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.


Air Quality



Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐17).

Table 3.3‐17. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions




PM2.5Total


Totalemissions 0.06 1.92 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.05



CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthePattersonPassProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐18.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐18,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐17,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABmaydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.


Air Quality



Table 3.3‐18. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions




PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


3.37 28.26 10.50 0.04 0.99 1.42 0.98 0.06


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



5.29 44.83 19.16 0.06 1.57 4.92 1.55 3.99






Totalemissions 13.11 124.86 49.86 0.24 4.13 15.81 4.04 7.07


Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No




TheprojectproponentalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.Althoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybe


Air Quality



minorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐19through3.3‐21.

Table 3.3‐19. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity



PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust



Totalemissions 0.68 5.58 2.67 0.01 0.23 0.15 0.23 0.01



Table 3.3‐20. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions

OperationalActivity



PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust



Totalemissions 0.02 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00



Table 3.3‐21. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions




PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust


3.37 22.61 10.50 0.04 0.54 0.64 0.54 0.03


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



5.29 35.86 19.16 0.06 0.86 2.21 0.85 1.80






Totalemissions 13.11 104.89 49.86 0.24 2.55 7.27 2.48 3.24


Air Quality



ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)


Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No


a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants


Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐19;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐20.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐21).TheimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐17,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐3a‐1:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofprogramAlternative1wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Dependingontheconstructionactivitiesunderwayduringanygivenmonth,from40to150workerswouldbeatthesiteduringconstruction.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheprogram.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutants


Air Quality



associatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheprogramandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

However,asnotedabove,projectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5wouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative1aregreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactsaresignificantandunavoidable.



ImpactAQ‐3a‐2:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofprogramAlternative2wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative2wouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.




Air Quality



ImpactAQ‐3b:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXfortheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐16),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.



ImpactAQ‐3c:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXforthePattersonPassProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐21),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.



Air Quality




ImpactAQ‐4a‐1:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

Long‐termoperationsassociatedwiththeprogramwouldresultinnonewemissions.Constructionactivitieswouldgenerateairpollutantemissions,includingequipmentexhaustemissionsandsuspendedandinhalablePM.However,constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprogramarea.Inaddition,theclosestsensitivereceptorstotheprogramareaareacommunityofsingle‐familyresidencesinthecityofLivermorelocatedapproximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaboundaryandtheMountainHousecommunityofsingle‐familyresidences,threeelementaryschoolschildcarefacilities,andparksandopenspaceareas,locatedapproximately5,000feettotheeastoftheprogramareaboundary.TheemissionsmodelingshowsthatamajorityofDPMexhaustemissions(PM10andPM2.5)areassociatedwithturbinefoundationsandbatchplantandoffsitetrucktrips.Thecementbatchplants,whichrepresentastationarysourceofemissions,wouldnotlikelybelocatedattheprogramareaboundary.Assuch,thedistancefromthebatchplantstothenearestsensitivereceptorswouldlikelybegreaterthan4,500feet.Regardingoffsitetrucktrips,thesewouldbetransitoryandwouldoccuronmultipleroadsoverawidespreadarea,therebyhelpingtodispersetoxicpollutantsandminimizeexposure.Therefore,program‐relatedconstructionemissionswouldbesufficientlydilutedatthenearestsensitivereceptorlocations.

WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐4a‐2:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactofprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.



Air Quality




ImpactAQ‐4b:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately4,584‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐4c:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately945‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.



ImpactAQ‐5a‐1:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)

Typicalodorsourcesofconcernincludewastewatertreatmentplants,sanitarylandfills,transferstations,compostingfacilities,petroleumrefineries,asphaltbatchplants,chemicalmanufacturingfacilities,animalfeedlots,fiberglassmanufacturingfacilities,autobodyshops,andrenderingplants.Theprogramwouldresultinthedevelopmentofnewwindturbinegeneratorsthatwouldnotresultinobjectionableodors.Althoughprogramconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately5years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprogram


Air Quality



area,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theprogramwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.


ImpactAQ‐5a‐2:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately4years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.


ImpactAQ‐5b:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe4,584‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.


ImpactAQ‐5c:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe945‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.


Cumulative Analysis

CumulativeimpactsrelatedtoairqualityareaddressedinImpactsAQ‐3a‐1,AQ‐3a‐2,AQ‐3b,andAQ‐3c.Impactswouldbesignificantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation.


Air Quality



3.3.3 References Cited

Printed References

AlamedaCounty.1998.DraftEnvironmentalImpactReport—RepoweringaPortionoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.August.StateClearinghouse#98022024.Hayward,CA:AlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency.

———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.

BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict.2010.BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict—LivermoreValley.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications‐and‐Outreach/Air‐Quality‐in‐the‐Bay‐Area/Bay‐Area‐Climatology/Subregions/Livermore‐Valley.aspx.LastUpdated:October4,2010.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2011.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines%20May%202011.ashx.LastUpdated:May2011.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2012.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines_Final_May%202012.ashx?la=en.LastUpdated:May2012.Accessed:July10,2013.

CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard.1998.FindingsoftheScientificReviewontheReportonDieselExhaust.AdoptedApril22.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/combined.pdf.Accessed:April8,2013.

———.2000.RiskReductionPlantoReduceParticulateMatterEmissionsfromDiesel‐FueledEnginesandVehicles.Sacramento,CA.PreparedbyStationarySourceDivisionandMobileSourceControlDivision.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/documents/rrpfinal.pdf.Accessed:June27,2013.

———.2009.TheCaliforniaAlmanacofEmissionsandAirQuality–2009Edition.Chapter4:AirBasinTrendsandForecasts‐‐CriteriaPollutants.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac09/pdf/chap409.pdf.Accessed:February12,2014.

———.2011.AreaDesignationsMaps.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013a.AmbientAirQualityStandards.June.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013b.Top4Summary:Pollutant/YearRangeSelection.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013c.EmissionFactorModel(EMFAC)2011.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm.Accessed:June9,2013.


Air Quality



ContraCostaCounty.2010.VascoWindsRepoweringProject DraftEnvironmentalImpactReportandAppendices.December.Available:http://www.co.contra‐costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/5349.Accessed:July10,2010.

SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict.2002.GuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts.LastRevised:January10,2002.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI%20Jan%202002%20Rev.pdf.Accessed:July18,2013.

———.2013.AmbientAirQualityStandardsandValleyAttainmentStatus.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm.Accessed:July18,2013.

SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict.2006.ParticulateMatter(PM)2.5SignificanceThresholdsandCalculationMethodology.AppendixA—UpdatedCEIDARSTablewithPM2.5Fractions.Available:http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/PM2_5/PM2_5.html.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2011.CaliforniaEmissionEstimatorModel(CalEEMod).User’sGuideVersion2011.1—AppendixDDefaultDataTables—Table3.4.DevelopedbyENVIRONInternationalCorporationincollaborationwithSCAQMDandotherCaliforniaAirDistricts.Available:http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed:October4,2011.

U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.1995a.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors,Volume1:StationaryPointandAreaSources.FifthEdition.Chapter3.3,GasolineandDieselIndustrialEngines.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch03/final/c03s03.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.

———.1995b.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.9,WesternSurfaceCoalMining.AsCitedinCalEEModUserGuide(2011),AppendixA(page8).Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s09.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.

———.1995c.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.12,ConcreteBatching.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s12.pdf.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2012.TheGreenBookNonattainmentAreasforCriteriaPollutants.LastRevised:December14,2012.Available:http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/.Accessed:June27,2013.

———.2013a.NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:April4,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013b.Health|NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:February14,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/health.html.Accessed:June26,2013.

WesternRegionalClimateCenter.2013.PeriodofRecordMonthlyClimateSummariesforLivermore,California.Available:http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi‐bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca4997.Accessed:June26,2013.


Air Quality



Personal Communications

Kirk,Alison.SeniorEnvironmentalPlanner,BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict,PlanningandResearchDivision.August31,2011—emaildescribingtheintentoftheBAAQMDdailyconstructionemissionsthresholds.

Siong,Patia.AirQualityPlanner,SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict.May23,2011—emailtoShannonHatcherregardingconstructionthresholds.

3.3 Air Quality - acgov.org · Nitrogen dioxide Annual mean 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm 0.053 ppm 1‐hour...

Documents

Transcript of 3.3 Air Quality - acgov.org · Nitrogen dioxide Annual mean 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm 0.053 ppm 1‐hour...