3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 “Just Enough Reality: Comfortable 3-D Viewing via...

21
3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 “Just Enough Reality: Comfortable 3-D Viewing via Microstereopsis” Mel Seigel and Shojiro Nagata IEEE TCSVT, Vol 10., No. 3, April 2000, 387-397. Presentation: Revision 1.0 Copywrite Zachary Wartell University of North Carolina at Charlotte 2006
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 “Just Enough Reality: Comfortable 3-D Viewing via...

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1

“Just Enough Reality: Comfortable 3-D Viewing via Microstereopsis”

Mel Seigel and Shojiro Nagata

IEEE TCSVT, Vol 10., No. 3, April 2000, 387-397.

Presentation: Revision 1.0

Copywrite Zachary Wartell University of North Carolina at Charlotte 2006

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 2

Image Collection

• camera-to-scene distance: {132,48,30} cm(w/ lens focal length {50,20,12.5}mm)

• camera positions [-20,+20] mm from center-line at 1-mm intervals (41 positions total)

• 640 x 480 res.

{132,48,30} cm

[-20,+20] mm

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 3

Center-of-interest Correction

• Cross Lens Axis (CLA)• Parallel Axis

– image shift (display)– CCD shift (camera)

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 4

Center-of-interest – Crossed Lens Axis (CLA)

CCD

R“directmapping”

screen

L

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 5

COI: Parallel Camera – Image Shift

CCD

RL

“directmapping”

imageshift

screen

RL

RL

imageshift+

clipping

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 6

COI: Parallel Camera – CCD Shift

CCD

screen

RL

“directMapping”

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 7

CCD Shift: Multi-Axis Shift

CCD

screen

RL

“directmapping”

CCD shift in X and Yx

y

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 8

CCD Shift: X-Axis Shift + Inverted Telephoto

CCD

screen

RL

“directmapping”

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 9

Depth-Pair Ordering Experiment

• 80 pairs of stereo pictures– 1st 40: one picture has no stereo– 2nd 40: both have stereo– within each 40: 5 sequences of 8 pairs, each

sequence has mean m.e.s. in {4.5,3.5,2.5,1.5,0.5} mm

• sub’s indicates whether left, right, or neither stereo image has more ‘3D-ness’ than the other

• use wide-angle set of images (D=30cm)

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 10

left picture m.e.s. [0,10]mm

right

pic

ture

m.e

.s.

[0,1

0]m

m

0%

100%

Results

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 11

Results

• informally, 10 mm m.e.s. fusion time is effectively 0

• microstereopsis gives depth order information, but not absolutely correct depth:

“delivers ‘just enough reality’ for computer graphics, video news and entertainment, and enough for most eye-hand coordinated tasks, including teleoperation of mobile robots” -Question: Is this an overstatement? For which tasks?

• at smallest m.e.s., sub’s w/out stereo glasses ‘perceive’ only a slight blurring that is not distracting

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 12

Hypothesis on Future Displays

• with microstereopsis, “it should be possible to stimulate binocular stereopsis even in presence of substantial crosstalk”

• suggests stereo displays presenting microstereopic applications may allow for lots of crosstalk– might support new display technology

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 13

Crosstalk Experiment (Anecdotal)

• 3 sub’s• modify LCD shutter-glasses to control cross-talk• increase cross-talk until stereo animation with

20mm m.e.s. yields diplopia• reduce m.e.s. to 2mm• at 2mm, sub’s report perception of depth and no

perception of ghosting

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 14

Zoneless Autostereoscopic Display

• assuming microstereopsis applications, crosstalk may not be problem, so what kind of new displays are possible?

brighterto right eye

brighterto left eye

right eye image left eye image

60 Hz

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 15

Microstereopsis Summary

• for m.e.s. of 1-3 mm (out of 60-65mm)– disparity stimulate binocular stereopsis– cross-talk perceived as blur (depth-of-field)

rather than ghosting• non-veridical adjustment of image-shift alters

balance between negative & positive screen parallax which in microstereopsis condition appears to transfer blur to foreground or background

• problem: capturing left/right eye simultaneously using microstereopsis’s range of m.e.s. will require custom camera’s

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 16

Future Work

• more formal user studies• investigate new display technology

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 17

Comments & Questions?

• What does this mean to VR?– VR doesn’t require any extra work to get basic

“center-of-interest” correction—it is automatic; just use proper asymmetric view frustums as needed.

– experiment shows very small m.e.s. (1-3mm) can still yield binocular stereopsis. How much does this help in real tasks?

• undoubtedly task dependent (see prior work, etc.)

• What was viewer distance to display in exp. #1?– If view frustum not equivalent to CCD frustum,

displayed 3D image will be distorted. Could distortion exaggerate depth making stereopsis at 1-3mm m.e.s. discernable when it might not be under other distortions?

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 18

COI: Parallel Camera – CCD Shift

CCD

screen

RL

imageshift+

clipping

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 19

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 20

COI: Parallel Camera – Image Shift

CCD

L

R

“naïve stretch”

L

R correct!

screen

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 21