23067802 Evolution of HRIS Justification Ravenshaw Management Centre
-
Upload
nilesh-mandlik -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of 23067802 Evolution of HRIS Justification Ravenshaw Management Centre
Cost justifying HRIS investments
Group - 3Jaspreet
Manas
Preetam
Shakti
Snigdha
Sonali
Contents
IntroductionHR Matrix Justification strategies for HRIS investmentsEvolution of HRIS justificationApproaches to investment analysesHRIS CBA analysis
CBA MatrixExample of CBA analysis
Estimating the timing of benefits & costsEstimating the value of indirect benefits
Introduction HRIS provides primary infra structure used to deliver- hr programs hr regulatory HRIS brings faster – recruiting ,compensation , job analysis
Larger companies have more features in their HRIS system Two criteria in 2000 for decision takers – 1.did the new system offer the base line functionality required by
the organization in a y2k compliant form ? 2.could the system be delivered in time?
Sonali - 50
HR METRICS
Human capital ROI (Revenue-(operating expenses-[compensation cost + benefit cost)
ROI ratios for employees
Human capital value added
(Revenue – (Operating expense – [compensation cost + Benefit cost ]))/ Total no. of FTE
Value of work force knowledge.
Revenue factor Revenue/ Total no. of FTE Effectiveness of the company
Training investment factor
Total training cost / Head count Training cost for employees
Training (ROI) Total benefits-Total cost *100 Total financial benefit an organization realizes
Turn over cost Total cost of separation +vacancy+ Replacement + Training
It determines turn over cost for one position
Snigdha- 49
HR METRICS
HR expense factor HR expense/ Total operating expense
Total operating expenses in an organization
Absence Rate No of days absent in a month / Avg no of employees during month * no of work days * 100
Measures absenteeism
Health care costs per employees
Total cost of health care / total employees
Per capita cost of employees benefits
Vacancy rate Total number of vacant positions as of today / total number of positions as of today * 100
Measures vacancy’s rate
Snigdha- 49
Justification strategies for HRIS investment
Two categories'
1. Risk avoidance- are used when investments are believed to eliminate or mitigate significant future risk
It focuses on magnitude and timing of risk and are not supported by the extensive investment analysis required by CBA
2. Organization enhancement- it highlights how effectiveness of the firm will be improved by the addition of a new improved HRIS- as measured by increases in revenues or reductions in cost
They are more challenging to sell to decision makers than risk avoidance because enhancement don't carry the threat of real loss
Shakti- 45
Evolution of HRIS justification
• Next generation of HRIS functionality will be more difficult to justify
• Shift from administratively intense paper and pencil hr process to electronic transaction processing
• Up gradation will still be done incase of small and medium size organizations for reduction in cost
• Under investment in HRIS is likely for organizations with an operational HRIS
• Use of out dated CBA methodologies that emphasize cost reduction and don't recognize the value of organization enhancement
• HRIS need tools to identify the sources of value that result from HRIS investment
Shakti- 45
Keys to successful HRIS
The objective is to implement organizational effectiveness
Be honest to yourselfFocus on functionality not productsEstimate your businessDevelop the best estimate possibleDeveloping an accurate CBA and
justifying a choice should be regarded as different issues.
Jaspreet - 20
Cost Benefit Analysis
A comparison between projected costs & benefits.
Advisor may be from finance & account department.
Investment analysis are done on the basis ofSources of costs & benefits.An estimated dollar value for each cost & benefit
item.Time when organization will incur each cost &
receive each benefit.
Preetam - 34
HRIS CBA AnalysisDirect Indirect
Benefits Revenue Enhancement
New Revenue (New sales)
Improvement potential
(Better decision making)
Benefits Cost Reduction
Direct costs(cancelled vendor
contracts)
Potential costs(saved staff time)
Costs New Implementation
Costs
Out of pocket costs
(software, service agreement)
Indirect costs(Increased
technical support needs)
Preetam - 34
Example of e-learning CBA matrix
Direct Indirect
Revenue Enhancements Outsourcing e-learning sales of locally
developed learning modules or programs
Better customer service leads to increase in
repeat sales
Cost reductions Reduced T.A. , HRA, requirement for paper
based learning materials & teaching aids
Improved safety(fewer injuries, less lost time,
fewer insurance claims)
Cost of implementation Installation support software fee, license fee,
courseware purchase, training administrator
etc.
Increased use of end-user help desk
courseware redevelopment
Preetam - 34
Estimating the timing of benefits and cost
After identified and valued the benefits and cost
When the cost and benefit will occur in the
entire HRIS project
Organization link to cash inflow and out flow
the cost and revenue differ from time periods
Critical period 5 years
Manas- 25
Estimating the value of undirected benefitsapproach description When to use it Advantages/limitation
Direct estimation Direct estimates of the relationship of the potential benefits to the estimated cost of engaging in an investment
Cost is lowAttempting to gain compliance or mitigating extreme risksSubstantial direct cost reduction or revenue enhancements exist
Quick and low cost to perform less data for monitoring implementation and follow upHighly dependent on expertise decision
Bench marking Using bench mark data from other firms to estimate the potential benefit and costs that are likey to result from the purchase of HRIS functionality
When cost is largeOrganization has limited experience or no data
Precise estimation through other organizations experienceAvg estimation may not be generalize
Manas- 25
Contd…approach description When to use it Advantages or
/limitation
Internal assessment Analysis based on specific internal assessments of actual cost and likely benefits
Cost are high benefits not very large then costAssessment capabilities to gather data
Precise base lineCosts and current performance of existing process compare with potential improvementsMay increase both costs and time
Mix and match Using combination of these approaches
Different amounts or resources of information are available for different types of cost and benefits
Permits the organization to use the best methods available
Manas- 25
Thank You