2021 Local Government Community Satisfaction Survey ...
Transcript of 2021 Local Government Community Satisfaction Survey ...
2021 Local
Government
Community
Satisfaction Survey
Whitehorse City
Council
Coordinated by the Department of Jobs,
Precincts and Regions on behalf of
Victorian councils
Contents
2
Background and objectives 3
Key findings and recommendations 4
Detailed findings 11
Overall performance 12
Customer service 30
Communication 36
Council direction 41
Individual service areas 45
Community consultation and engagement 46
Lobbying on behalf of the community 50
Decisions made in the interest of the
community
54
Condition of sealed local roads 58
Informing the community 62
Enforcement of local laws 66
Family support services 70
Elderly support services 74
Recreational facilities 78
Appearance of public areas 82
Art centres and libraries 86
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community and cultural activities 90
Waste management 94
Planning and building permits 98
Environmental sustainability 102
Detailed demographics 106
Appendix A: Index scores, margins of error
and significant differences
113
Appendix B: Further project information 118
Background and objectives
3
The Victorian Community Satisfaction Survey
(CSS) creates a vital interface between the council
and their community.
Held annually, the CSS asks the opinions of local
people about the place they live, work and play and
provides confidence for councils in their efforts
and abilities.
Now in its twenty-second year, this survey provides
insight into the community’s views on:
• councils’ overall performance, with benchmarking
against State-wide and council group results
• value for money in services and infrastructure
• community consultation and engagement
• decisions made in the interest of the community
• customer service, local infrastructure, facilities,
services and
• overall council direction.
When coupled with previous data, the survey provides
a reliable historical source of the community’s views
since 1998. A selection of results from the last ten
years shows that councils in Victoria continue to
provide services that meet the public’s expectations.
Serving Victoria for 22 years
Each year the CSS data is used to develop this State-
wide report which contains all of the aggregated
results, analysis and data. Moreover, with 22 years of
results, the CSS offers councils a long-term measure of
how they are performing – essential for councils that
work over the long term to provide valuable services
and infrastructure to their communities.
Participation in the State-wide Local Government
Community Satisfaction Survey is optional.
Participating councils have various choices as to the
content of the questionnaire and the sample size to be
surveyed, depending on their individual strategic,
financial and other considerations.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Key findings and
recommendations
4
Co
mp
are
d t
o
Sta
te-w
ide a
vera
ge
Co
mp
are
d t
o
gro
up
av
era
ge
Whitehorse City Council – at a glance
5
Overall council performanceResults shown are index scores out of 100.
Council performance compared to
State-wide and group averages
The three areas where Council
performance is significantly
higher by the widest margin
Elderly support services
Areas where Council
performance is significantly
lower
Whitehorse 69
State-wide 61
Metropolitan 67
Sealed local roads
Waste management
Community decisions
Sealed local roads
Waste management
None
Informing the
community
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Summary of core measures
6
Index scores
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
72 72
7072
73
78
737473 73
7072 69 71
69
64 6767
69 6968 69
61
63
5657 57 57
60 5757
5958
6061
60
71
74
77 77
7772
75
5453
50
51
51
52
5153
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Waste
management
Sealed
local
roads
Consultation &
engagement
Customer
service
Overall
council
direction
Overall
performance
Community
decisions
Summary of core measures
7
Core measures summary results (%)
16
8
8
26
31
34
46
28
32
44
44
39
32
32
28
20
14
14
4
14
10
7
6
6
3
3
3
2
4
3
14
20
1
2
3
Overall performance
Consultation & engagement
Community decisions
Sealed local roads
Waste management
Customer service
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
12 70 7 10Overall council direction
Improved Stayed the same Deteriorated Can't say
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Services Whitehorse
2021
Whitehorse
2020
Metro
2021
State-wide
2021
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Overall performance 69 68 67 61 Box Hill residents Aged 35-49 years
Value for money 63 - 62 54 Aged 65+ yearsAged 35-49 years,
Box Hill residents
Overall council direction 53 51 55 53 Aged 18-34 years Aged 35-49 years
Customer service 74 73 74 70 Aged 65+ years Men
Appearance of public
areas76 73 74 73
Women, Aged 50-64
yearsMen
Waste management 75 72 72 69 Aged 50-64 years Aged 35-49 years
Recreational facilities 74 75 75 71Aged 65+ years,
Women
Men, Aged 18-34
years
Art centres & libraries 73 77 73 73 Aged 65+ years Aged 18-34 years
Sealed local roads 71 69 68 57 Aged 35-49 years
Aged 65+ years,
Aged 18-34 years,
Men, Nunawading
East residents
Elderly support services 70 71 66 69 Aged 65+ years Aged 18-34 years
Summary of Whitehorse City Council performance
8Significantly higher / lower than Whitehorse City Council 2021 result at the 95% confidence interval.
Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Services Whitehorse
2021
Whitehorse
2020
Metro
2021
State-wide
2021
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Family support services 67 72 67 66 Aged 65+ years Aged 18-34 years
Community & cultural 67 73 66 65 Aged 65+ years Aged 18-34 years
Enforcement of local
laws66 66 66 64 Women Men
Environmental
sustainability63 65 64 62
Nunawading
East residents
Aged 35-49 years,
Box Hill
Community decisions 60 61 61 56 Women Aged 50-64 years
Informing the community 59 63 62 60Aged 35-49
yearsAged 18-34 years
Lobbying 58 59 56 55
Nunawading
East residents,
Aged 65+ years
Aged 50-64 years,
Aged 18-34 years,
Men, Nunawading
West residents
Consultation &
engagement57 60 59 56
Aged 50-64
years, Women,
Nunawading
East residents
Nunawading West
residents, Men,
Aged 18-34 years
Building & planning
permits54 53 54 51
Aged 18-34
years
Aged 65+ years,
Aged 35-49 years
Summary of Whitehorse City Council performance
9Significantly higher / lower than Whitehorse City Council 2021 result at the 95% confidence interval.
Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Focus areas for the next 12 months
10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Overview
Whitehorse City Council’s overall performance index experienced a one-point increase
over the last 12 months, returning to the peak rating last seen in 2019. While performance
ratings remained steady across most individual service areas, significant declines occurred
in the areas of community and cultural activities, family support services, art centres and
libraries and informing the community. Importantly, performance ratings of the appearance
of public areas increased significantly.
Key influences on
perceptions of overall
performance
Council should focus on maintaining and improving performance in the individual service
areas that most influence overall performance perceptions. The condition of sealed local
roads is shown to have the strongest influence on Council's overall performance rating and
Council performs relatively well here. Most in need of attention is decisions made in the
interests of the community and informing the community, as these service areas are rated
less well, but are among the service areas that are more influential on overall perceptions.
Comparison to state
and area grouping
Positively, Whitehorse City Council performs significantly higher than the State-wide and
Metropolitan group averages on waste management and sealed local roads. Council also
rates significantly higher than the Metropolitan group average in the area of elderly support
services but significantly lower in informing the community. On other service areas, it is on
par with the Metropolitan group average.
Maintain gains
achieved to date
Council should look to consolidate and build upon its strong and improved performance on
the appearance of public areas, waste management and the condition of sealed local
roads. Demonstrating that Council consults and engages with residents on relevant
matters, particularly those regarding its approach to building and planning permits – which
is showing incremental improvement over time – will also help to bolster perceptions of its
overall performance in the year ahead.
DETAILED
FINDINGS
11
Overall
performance
12
The overall performance index score of 69 for
Whitehorse City Council marks a marginal improvement
on the 2020 result and a return to the peak rating.
Council’s overall performance continues to rate
statistically significantly higher (at the 95% confidence
interval) than the State-wide average for councils, and
in line with the Metropolitan group average.
• Overall performance is rated highest among Box Hill
residents and lowest among 35 to 49 year-olds (index
scores of 71 and 67 respectively).
• Notably, the most improved ratings are among
residents aged 50 to 64 years (index score of 69 – up
four points). While this is not a significant increase, it
marks an all-time high rating among this cohort, who
in the previous evaluation had been most critical of
Council’s overall performance.
Almost half of residents (48%) rate the value for money
they receive from Council in infrastructure and services
provided to their community as ‘very good’ or ‘good’. A
further one in three (33%) rate Council as ‘average’,
while 11% rate it as ‘very poor’ or ‘poor’.
• Residents aged 65 years and over have significantly
more positive perceptions of Council’s value for
money, whereas 35 to 49 year-olds and Box Hill
residents have the least positive perceptions.
Overall performance
13
Overall performanceResults shown are index scores out of 100.
State-wide
61
Box Hill residents rate overall
performance highest (71)
Aged 35-49 years rate overall
performance lowest (67)
Whitehorse
69
Metropolitan
67
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
69
70
65
69
68
69
68
66
71
67
66
58
73
70
65
70
69
72
68
66
71
69
67
60
66
71
64
68
69
71
69
66
73
67
65
59
70
67
63
67
67
68
67
64
67
67
64
59
66
68
68
68
67
70
66
64
72
63
66
59
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
67
60
n/a
67
57
65
64
65
63
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
61
n/a
71
67
70
69
70
67
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
60
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
60
Overall performance
2021 overall performance (index scores)
71
70
69
69
69
68
68
68
68
67
67
61q
Box Hill
65+
50-64
Women
Whitehorse
18-34
Men
Nunawading West
Nunawading East
35-49
Metro
State-wide
14
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q3. ON BALANCE, for the last twelve months, how do you feel about the performance of Whitehorse City Council, not just on one or two
issues, BUT OVERALL across all responsibility areas? Has it been very good, good, average, poor or very poor?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Overall performance
15
2021 overall performance (%)
16
15
17
15
12
14
8
13
11
15
15
17
15
15
17
11
15
18
21
46
51
49
54
50
50
46
54
39
47
46
49
43
48
44
52
47
44
38
32
28
27
23
30
29
35
27
34
29
32
27
35
31
32
35
28
31
31
4
2
4
6
4
5
7
2
10
6
4
3
3
5
2
1
8
3
4
3
1
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
2
2
4
3
1
4
1
1
3
6
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2014 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q3. ON BALANCE, for the last twelve months, how do you feel about the performance of Whitehorse City Council, not just on one or two
issues, BUT OVERALL across all responsibility areas? Has it been very good, good, average, poor or very poor?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Value for money in services and infrastructure
2021 value for money (index scores)
68p
67
65
63
63
62
62
62
62
61
61
54q
65+
Nunawading East
Women
Whitehorse
50-64
Nunawading West
Metro
18-34
Men
Box Hill
35-49
State-wide
16
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q3b. How would you rate Whitehorse City Council at providing good value for money in infrastructure
and services provided to your community?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Value for money in services and infrastructure
17
2021 value for money (%)
13
8
12
16
8
14
12
14
7
15
10
19
35
31
39
29
36
43
34
37
36
34
37
36
33
34
32
32
35
32
32
34
36
31
34
31
8
15
9
10
7
5
10
5
7
12
8
5
3
8
3
3
3
1
3
2
1
6
2
2
8
4
5
10
10
5
9
8
13
3
10
8
2021 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q3b. How would you rate Whitehorse City Council at providing good value for money in infrastructure
and services provided to your community?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appearance of public areas is where Council performed
best in 2021 (index score of 76). Since the previous
evaluation, performance perceptions of this service area
improved significantly by three-points, marking a full
recovery from the significant decline in 2020.
• Key contributors to this increase are significant
improvements in performance perceptions among
residents aged 18 to 34 and 50 to 64 years (both up
nine points on the previous result).
Waste management is Council’s next highest rated
service area (index score of 75), followed by recreational
facilities (74), art centres and libraries (73 – a significant
four-point decrease) and sealed local roads (71).
Of note, Council performs significantly higher than both
the State-wide and Metropolitan group averages in the
areas of waste management and sealed local roads.
The appearance of public areas, waste management and
sealed local roads all have a positive influence on
perceptions of Council’s overall performance. Maintaining
these high ratings should remain a focus for Council.
Council’s strong performance in the aforementioned areas
is further highlighted by the fact that 18% of residents
volunteer parks and gardens as the best thing about
Council. One in ten (10%) nominate recreational/ sporting
facilities, and 8% cite waste management (noting that
13% cite this as an area most in need of improvement).
Top performing service areas
18
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appearance of public areas (index score
of 76) is the area where Council
performed best in 2021.
Council continues to rate lowest in the area of planning
and building permits (index score of 54), despite a one-
point improvement on the 2020 result. Consistent with
previous evaluations, this service area exhibits the
largest diparity between importance and performance
perceptions (20-point differential).
• Perceptions do not differ significantly from the
average across demographic and geographic cohorts.
• Planning and building permits is one of the service
areas that influences perceptions of overall
performance – so efforts to address resident concerns
here should be considered.
Furthermore, inappropriate or over-development and
town planning/ permits /red tape are two of the most
frequently mentioned areas as in need of improvement
(by 8% and 6% of residents respectively).
Community consultation and engagement is Council’s
next lowest rated service area (index score of 57, the
equal lowest rating for Council on this measure).
• Perceptions declined significantly among 18 to 34
year-old residents and those in Nunawading West.
Council also performs relatively less well in lobbying
(index score of 58) and informing the community (59 –
significantly lower than the Metropolitan group average
and a significant four-point decline on the 2020 result).
Low performing service areas
19
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Council rates lowest – relative to its
performance in other areas – in the area
of planning and building permits (index
score of 54).
76
75
74
73
71
70
67
67
66
63
60
59
58
57
54
Appearance of public areas
Waste management
Recreational facilities
Art centres & libraries
Sealed local roads
Elderly support services
Family support services
Community & cultural
Enforcement of local laws
Environmental sustainability
Community decisions
Informing the community
Lobbying
Consultation & engagement
Planning & building permits
Individual service area performance
2021 individual service area performance (index scores)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
20
73
72
75
77
69
71
72
73
66
65
61
63
59
60
53
76
77
77
78
72
70
70
74
65
66
60
64
56
57
52
73
77
76
77
70
70
69
75
65
65
58
62
56
57
50
77
77
76
79
73
69
72
74
65
68
59
61
56
57
50
74
74
75
74
73
70
69
73
65
64
57
61
57
56
50
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
60
63
n/a
74
71
74
77
n/a
72
71
72
66
66
n/a
n/a
56
61
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on [RESPONSIBILITY AREA] over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
Individual service area performance
21
2021 individual service area performance (%)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
30
31
27
23
26
12
10
13
12
11
8
11
5
8
9
49
44
43
39
44
30
26
34
38
34
32
31
22
28
22
17
14
22
19
20
20
21
24
26
29
28
34
28
32
23
2
6
3
3
7
2
3
6
5
7
10
13
8
14
13
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
3
5
2
3
8
1
2
5
16
1
35
39
22
17
16
20
6
35
14
25
Appearance of public areas
Waste management
Recreational facilities
Art centres & libraries
Sealed local roads
Elderly support services
Family support services
Community & cultural
Enforcement of local laws
Environmental sustainability
Community decisions
Informing the community
Lobbying
Consultation & engagement
Planning & building permits
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on [RESPONSIBILITY AREA] over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
85
76
79
77
76
73
75
73
71
73
70
69
72
65
60
84
78
76
77
73
73
76
72
71
71
71
68
71
63
60
84
78
79
76
74
74
77
72
72
72
71
69
71
64
60
81
79
78
76
73
75
76
75
72
71
71
66
72
64
59
81
79
78
76
74
73
76
74
75
74
75
69
72
68
62
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
80
77
n/a
n/a
71
69
n/a
73
71
n/a
n/a
66
71
n/a
60
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
85
78
78
76
76
74
74
74
74
73
72
70
69
66
61
Waste management
Elderly support services
Community decisions
Sealed local roads
Environmental sustainability
Family support services
Planning & building permits
Appearance of public areas
Recreational facilities
Informing the community
Consultation & engagement
Art centres & libraries
Enforcement of local laws
Lobbying
Community & cultural
Individual service area importance
2021 individual service area importance (index scores)
22
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should [RESPONSIBILITY AREA] be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 10
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Individual service area importance
2021 individual service area importance (%)
50
37
34
38
32
30
26
26
32
28
26
24
21
19
13
39
43
44
36
42
42
46
45
38
41
42
40
40
37
33
10
15
16
17
24
21
26
26
21
25
26
29
29
31
41
1
2
2
6
2
3
2
3
5
4
4
5
6
8
10
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
Waste management
Elderly support services
Community decisions
Environmental sustainability
Sealed local roads
Family support services
Appearance of public areas
Recreational facilities
Planning & building permits
Informing the community
Consultation & engagement
Art centres & libraries
Enforcement of local laws
Lobbying
Community & cultural
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
23Q1. Firstly, how important should [RESPONSIBILITY AREA] be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
74
78
72
73
76
85
Planning & building permits
Community decisions
Consultation & engagement
Informing the community
Environmental sustainability
Waste management
54
60
57
59
63
75
Individual service areas importance vs performance
24Note: Net differentials are calculated based on the un-rounded importance and performance scores, then rounded to the nearest whole
number, which may result in differences of +/-1% in the importance and performance scores and the net differential scores.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Importance (index scores) Performance (index scores) Net Differential
Service areas where importance exceeds performance by 10 points or more,
suggesting further investigation is necessary.
-20
-17
-15
-15
-12
-10
Influences on perceptions of overall performance
25
The individual service area that has the strongest
influence on the overall performance rating (based on
regression analysis) is:
• The condition of sealed local roads.
Council currently performs very well in this service
area (index score of 71) and a continued focus on
maintaining the local road network provides the
greatest opportunity to drive up overall opinion of
Council’s performance.
Following on from that, other individual service areas
with a more moderate influence on the overall
performance rating are:
• Decisions made in the interest of the community
• Informing the community
• The appearance of public areas
• Community consultation and engagement
• Waste management
• Planning and building permits.
The appearance of public areas and waste
management are Council’s best performing service
areas (index score of 76 and 75 respectively) and a
moderate influence on the overall performance rating.
Maintaining these positive results should remain a
focus but there is greater work to be done elsewhere.
Other service areas that have a moderate influence on
overall perceptions, but perform relatively less well, are
planning and building permits, community consultation,
informing the community and community decisions
(performance index score of 54, 57, 59 and 60
respectively).
Addressing resident concerns about Council’s
approach to planning and building permits, and
ensuring good communication, consultation and
transparency with residents in Council decision
making, can also help shore up positive ratings of
Council’s overall performance.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The regressions are shown on the following two charts.
1. The first chart shows the results of a regression
analysis of all individual service areas selected by
Council.
2. The second chart shows the results of a
regression performed on a smaller set of service
areas, being those with a moderate-to-strong
influence on overall performance. Service areas
with a weaker influence on overall performance (i.e.
a low Standardised Beta Coefficient) have been
excluded from the analysis.
Key insights from this analysis are derived from
the second chart.
Regression analysis explained
26
We use regression analysis to investigate which
individual service areas, such as community
consultation, condition of sealed local roads, etc. (the
independent variables) are influencing respondent
perceptions of overall council performance (the
dependent variable).
In the charts that follow:
• The horizontal axis represents the council
performance index for each individual service.
Service areas appearing on the right-side of the
chart have a higher performance index than those on
the left.
• The vertical axis represents the Standardised Beta
Coefficient from the multiple regression performed.
This measures the contribution of each service area
to the model. Service areas near the top of the chart
have a greater positive effect on overall performance
ratings than service areas located closer to the axis.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Influence on overall performance: all service areas
27
The multiple regression analysis model above (all service areas) has an R² value of 0.529 and adjusted R² value of 0.514, which means that
53% of the variance in community perceptions of overall performance can be predicted from these variables. The overall model effect was
statistically significant at p = 0.0001, F = 36.22. This model should be interpreted with some caution as some data is not normally distributed
and not all service areas have linear correlations.
2021 regression analysis (all service areas)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community consultation
Lobbying
Informing the community
Enforcement of local laws
Family support services
Elderly support services
Recreational facilities
The appearance of public areas
Art centres and libraries
Community and cultural activities
Waste management
Planning and building permits
Environmental sustainability
Community decisions
Condition of sealed local roads
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Performance Index Very GoodVery Poor
Gre
ate
r p
ositiv
e in
flu
en
ce
on
Ove
rall
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Gre
ate
r n
eg
ative
in
flu
en
ce
on
Ove
rall
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Influence on overall performance: key service areas
28The multiple regression analysis model above (reduced set of service areas) has an R² value of 0.507 and adjusted R² value of 0.500, which
means that 51% of the variance in community perceptions of overall performance can be predicted from these variables. The overall model
effect was statistically significant at p = 0.0001, F = 72.22.
2021 regression analysis (key service areas)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community consultation
Informing the community The appearance
of public areas
Waste managementPlanning and
building permits
Community decisions
Condition of sealed local roads
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Gre
ate
r p
ositiv
e in
flu
en
ce
on
Ove
rall
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Gre
ate
r n
eg
ative
in
flu
en
ce
on
Ove
rall
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Performance Index Very GoodVery Poor
Focus on these areas satisfactorily to ensure
negative perceptions do not have an overly negative
impact on community perceptions of overall
performance. Improvements will have a moderate-
to-strong influence on overall perceptions.
Key positive influences on overall rating
and should remain a focus - but
currently performing ‘very well’ here.
Improvements will have a moderate
influence on overall perceptions.
Should remain a focus as
currently performing ‘well’ here
and changes will have a stronger
influence on overall perceptions.
13
12
8
8
6
6
5
5
13
Waste Management
Communication
Development - Inappropriate/OverDevelopment
Informing the Community
Town Planning/Permits/Red Tape
Environmental Issues
Sealed Road Maintenance
Traffic Management
Nothing
18
10
9
8
8
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Parks and Gardens
Recreational/Sporting Facilities
Customer Service
Waste Management
Library/Libraries/Mobile Library
Road/Street Maintenance
Aged Support Services
Community Facilities
Community Support Services
Environmental
Public Areas
Median Strips/Nature Strips/Trees/Roundabouts
Generally Good
Best things about Council and areas for improvement
29
Q16. Please tell me what is the ONE BEST thing about Whitehorse City Council? It could be about any of the issues or services we have
covered in this survey or it could be about something else altogether?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 28 Councils asked group: 6
Q17. What does Whitehorse City Council MOST need to do to improve its performance?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 45 Councils asked group: 9
A verbatim listing of responses to these questions can be found in the accompanying dashboard.
2021 best things about Council (%)- Top mentions only -
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
2021 areas for improvement (%)- Top mentions only -
Customer
service
30
Customer service
Whitehorse City Council’s customer service index of 74
marks a slight, one-point increase on the 2020 result.
Customer service is rated in line with the Metropolitan
group and significantly higher than the State-wide
average (index scores of 74 and 70 respectively).
Promisingly, among those who had contact with
Council, more than seven in ten (73%) provide a
positive customer service rating.
Moreover, 9% of residents volunteer customer service
as the best thing about Whitehorse City Council.
• Like in previous evaluations, perceptions of Council’s
customer service are most positive among residents
aged 65 years and over and women (index scores of
79 and 78 respectively).
• Conversely, perceptions of customer service are least
positive among men and 35 to 49 year-olds (index
scores of 70 and 71 respectively).
Council should focus on recovering perceptions of its
customer service among residents aged 35 to 49 years
in the coming 12 months, given they currently have the
highest rate of contact with Council but the least
positive perceptions of its overall performance.
Contact with council and customer service
31
Contact with council
Fewer than three in five households (58%) have had
contact with Whitehorse City Council in the last 12
months, similar to last year.
• Rate of contact is highest among 35 to 49 year-old
residents (68%) and significantly lower among 18 to
34 year-olds (46%).
Among those who have had contact
with Council, 73% provide a positive
customer service rating of ‘very
good’ or ‘good’, including 34% who
rate Council’s customer service as
‘very good’.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Contact with council
2021 contact with council (%)
Have had contact
6057
49
64
60
52
59 58
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
32
Q5. Over the last 12 months, have you or any member of your household had any contact with Whitehorse City Council?
This may have been in person, in writing, by telephone conversation, by text message, by email or via their website or
social media such as Facebook or Twitter?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 39 Councils asked group: 6
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
61
67
70
60
61
63
64
52
59
54
57
50
62
75
55
56
56
61
55
53
52
48
48
32
68
64
63
57
65
61
58
54
60
61
54
51
74
67
63
57
66
58
70
66
64
64
62
50
56
64
43
58
47
58
57
59
49
49
52
31
n/a
n/a
n/a
60
n/a
60
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
67
n/a
n/a
58
61
52
n/a
57
n/a
56
44
56
70
n/a
n/a
62
60
58
n/a
60
n/a
58
57
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
61
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Contact with council
2021 contact with council (%)
68
64
63
62
62
61
61
59
58
54
54
46q
35-49
50-64
Nunawading East
Metro
Women
State-wide
65+
Box Hill
Whitehorse
Nunawading West
Men
18-34
33
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q5. Over the last 12 months, have you or any member of your household had any contact with Whitehorse City Council?
This may have been in person, in writing, by telephone conversation, by text message, by email or via their website or
social media such as Facebook or Twitter?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 39 Councils asked group: 6
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
79
77
73
74
73
74
77
66
69
76
69
70
80
78
81
75
78
76
74
80
78
75
77
71
77
71
77
77
73
72
67
70
74
69
75
70
72
72
73
73
72
71
71
73
73
71
72
69
76
73
75
71
70
73
70
61
66
69
68
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
74
74
n/a
72
72
n/a
n/a
68
n/a
73
69
72
82
76
n/a
73
72
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
63
68
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
Customer service rating
34
2021 customer service rating (index scores)
78
77
76
74
74
74
74
73
73
71
70
70q
65+
Women
Nunawading East
50-64
Whitehorse
Metro
Nunawading West
18-34
Box Hill
35-49
Men
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q5c. Thinking of the most recent contact, how would you rate Whitehorse City Council for customer service?
Please keep in mind we do not mean the actual outcome but rather the actual service that was received.
Base: All respondents who have had contact with Council in the last 12 months.
Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Customer service rating
35
2021 customer service rating (%)
34
37
40
37
35
31
31
35
32
37
33
27
42
26
40
28
31
39
40
39
34
36
31
33
39
41
35
35
34
36
44
37
41
37
40
38
35
40
14
13
15
15
19
15
13
15
17
16
15
19
10
17
12
19
13
13
13
6
6
5
8
6
10
9
5
8
7
8
6
3
8
4
8
8
6
1
4
6
2
5
5
5
4
7
6
4
2
2
7
4
4
6
6
5
3
3
2
4
2
1
1
3
1
2
6
2
1
3
3
5
4
2
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2014 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q5c. Thinking of the most recent contact, how would you rate Whitehorse City Council for customer service?
Please keep in mind we do not mean the actual outcome but rather the actual service that was received.
Base: All respondents who have had contact with Council in the last 12 months.
Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Communication
36
The most preferred form of communication from
Whitehorse City Council is newsletters sent via mail
(35%) and by email (30%).
• Among residents aged under 50 years, the
preference is reversed from the resident base at
large. Newsletters via email (32%) and then mail
(27%) are the preferred forms of communication
from Council.
• Among those aged over 50 years, mailed
newsletters (46%) continue to be preferred over
email newsletters (28%).
Preference for the mailed newsletters has increased by
seven percentage points in the past year, overtaking
the email format, which declined by five points.
Preference has changed somewhat over time, with a
clear pattern yet to be established.
Advertising and Council newsletter inserts in local
newspapers continue to have less appeal (preferred by
4% and 5% respectively, a series-low for both).
Communication
37
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Best form of communication
38
Q13. If Whitehorse City Council was going to get in touch with you to inform you about Council news and information and upcoming events,
which ONE of the following is the BEST way to communicate with you?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 35 Councils asked group: 7
Note: ‘Social Media’ was included in 2019.
2021 best form of communication (%)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
28 28
35
2928
35
31
35
31
33
35
30
16
1011
9 9
5
1311
12
88
4
49 5
4 7
8
34
23 3
5
11
7
9
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Council
Website
Text
MessageCouncil
Newsletter as
Local Paper Insert
Council
Newsletter
via Mail
Council
Newsletter
via Email
Advertising in
a Local
Newspaper
Social
Media
Best form of communication: under 50s
39
Q13. If Whitehorse City Council was going to get in touch with you to inform you about Council news and information and upcoming events,
which ONE of the following is the BEST way to communicate with you?.
Base: All respondents aged under 50. Councils asked state-wide: 35 Councils asked group: 7
Note: ‘Social Media’ was included in 2019.
2021 under 50s best form of communication (%)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Council
Website
Text
MessageCouncil
Newsletter as
Local Paper Insert
Council
Newsletter
via Mail
Council
Newsletter
via Email
Advertising in
a Local
Newspaper
Social
Media
2726
33
23 23
27
3638
35 35
40
32
13
710
8
6
1
8 810
55
46
14
6
5
1112
45
24 4
6
18
10
14
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Best form of communication: over 50s
40
Q13. If Whitehorse City Council was going to get in touch with you to inform you about Council news and information and upcoming events,
which ONE of the following is the BEST way to communicate with you?
Base: All respondents aged over 50. Councils asked state-wide: 35 Councils asked group: 7
Note: ‘Social Media’ was included in 2019.
2021 over 50s best form of communication (%)
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
29
32
3837
35
46
2531
25
30
2728
20
15
1211
14 10
19 15 15
1214
32 24
2
2 3
2 2
12
2 2
32
2
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Council
Website
Text
MessageCouncil
Newsletter as
Local Paper Insert
Council
Newsletter
via Mail
Council
Newsletter
via Email
Advertising in
a Local
Newspaper
Social
Media
Council direction
41
Perceptions of the direction of Whitehorse City
Council’s overall performance have recovered slightly
by two index points (index score of 53 – the highest
recorded since 2014).
Over the last 12 months, 12% of residents believe the
direction of Council’s overall performance has improved
(compared to 11% in 2020).
A majority of residents (70%, down one percentage
point) believe it has stayed the same, and 7% think it
has deteriorated (down two percentage points).
• The most satisfied with council direction are
residents aged 18 to 34 years (index score of 58 –
significantly higher than the Council-wide average).
More than five times as many in this age group think
Council’s overall performance has improved since
the last year as those who think it has deteriorated.
• The least satisfied with council direction are
residents aged 35 to 49 years (index score of 48). Of
these residents, more think Council’s overall
performance has deteriorated in the last year than
think it has improved.
Council direction
42
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Overall council direction last 12 months
43
2021 overall council direction (index scores)
58p
55
54
53
53
53
53
52
52
51
50
48
18-34
Metro
Box Hill
Nunawading West
Men
Whitehorse
State-wide
Women
65+
Nunawading East
50-64
35-49
53
54
54
48
50
51
51
52
53
52
47
49
58
55
55
51
54
52
53
51
52
52
46
50
54
54
55
47
51
51
52
51
51
52
44
52
56
54
54
48
50
51
53
51
51
51
45
48
59
55
46
48
49
50
51
50
46
54
48
43
n/a
56
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
53
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
59
n/a
n/a
n/a
50
53
53
56
49
n/a
47
53
61
n/a
n/a
n/a
52
54
53
55
55
n/a
52
45
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
52
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q6. Over the last 12 months, what is your view of the direction of Whitehorse City Council’s overall performance?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Overall council direction last 12 months
2021 overall council direction (%)
12
11
15
13
13
12
15
17
18
19
14
12
10
13
11
16
10
8
11
70
71
66
68
68
68
67
69
63
66
64
74
76
71
69
67
71
74
73
7
9
11
11
11
12
10
10
13
9
8
5
9
7
7
3
14
8
7
10
8
8
9
8
8
8
4
5
6
15
10
5
8
12
15
5
10
10
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2014 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Improved Stayed the same Deteriorated Can't say
44Q6. Over the last 12 months, what is your view of the direction of Whitehorse City Council’s overall performance?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Individual service
areas
45
Community consultation and engagement importance
46
2021 consultation and engagement importance (index scores)
73
73
74
72
75
66
72
70
72
72
68
62
75
73
74
72
75
70
71
71
75
70
69
64
73
72
74
72
78
67
72
71
76
70
69
64
75
71
74
74
76
71
72
71
70
71
68
65
75
79
75
76
76
75
73
75
76
74
73
71
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
76
75
75p
75
75
74
73
72
72
72
70
66q
65+
35-49
State-wide
Women
50-64
Nunawading East
Metro
Whitehorse
Box Hill
Nunawading West
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Community consultation and engagement’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community consultation and engagement importance
47
2021 consultation and engagement importance (%)
26
19
23
22
24
30
32
27
29
24
23
24
28
18
32
30
28
42
48
42
42
40
44
41
41
35
43
52
39
45
35
44
44
49
26
25
26
31
29
22
22
25
29
28
21
29
24
40
20
21
18
4
6
6
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
4
5
2
5
3
4
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Community consultation and engagement’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community consultation and engagement performance
48
2021 consultation and engagement performance (index scores)
55
62
58
58
59
61
58
60
55
63
58
62
49
58
58
59
60
59
58
57
56
58
55
53
56
56
57
60
56
58
57
57
55
58
59
56
53
58
57
57
58
54
54
57
55
64
56
56
56
58
58
62
55
55
54
56
54
60
55
52
n/a
n/a
58
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
56
n/a
n/a
n/a
56
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
64
63
57
64
61
n/a
59
63
n/a
n/a
n/a
63
62
61
57
59
58
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
57
n/a
n/a
n/a
59
59
59
59
58
58
57
57
56
55
55
55
50-64
Women
Metro
Nunawading East
Box Hill
65+
35-49
Whitehorse
State-wide
18-34
Men
Nunawading West
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Community consultation and engagement’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community consultation and engagement performance
49
2021 consultation and engagement performance (%)
8
10
8
8
5
4
9
8
9
10
5
13
8
7
9
5
9
11
11
28
30
26
26
31
32
40
36
30
32
29
21
32
27
28
26
35
25
25
32
35
33
36
34
34
27
36
32
32
32
33
33
34
31
38
29
37
26
14
9
14
11
9
12
8
7
15
12
14
15
14
15
14
15
13
14
15
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
6
4
4
2
2
4
2
1
6
1
4
14
13
16
16
15
15
13
11
8
11
16
15
11
12
16
15
9
12
20
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2014 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Community consultation and engagement’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Lobbying on behalf of the community importance
50
2021 lobbying importance (index scores)
68
68
66
66
69
65
63
62
67
64
65
62
67
67
64
65
62
63
64
65
62
63
66
59
69
68
64
66
62
64
63
63
64
69
67
60
67
69
63
67
65
64
64
62
64
67
66
60
71
69
70
68
67
68
72
67
65
71
64
65
n/a
69
n/a
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70p
69p
68
67
67
66
66
66
66
66
64
62
Women
State-wide
35-49
Metro
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
18-34
Nunawading East
65+
Box Hill
50-64
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Lobbying on behalf of the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 25 Councils asked group: 9
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Lobbying on behalf of the community importance
51
2021 lobbying importance (%)
19
17
16
18
16
22
24
21
21
20
16
15
23
18
21
24
17
37
39
37
36
38
38
39
39
37
35
38
32
40
39
39
23
38
31
27
31
30
32
30
27
28
28
31
35
35
28
33
32
29
29
8
11
11
10
10
7
7
8
8
7
8
9
6
6
5
15
8
2
2
3
3
3
1
2
2
2
4
4
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
3
3
5
2
2
1
7
6
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Lobbying on behalf of the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 25 Councils asked group: 9
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Lobbying on behalf of the community performance
52
2021 lobbying performance (index scores)
60
62
54
59
59
59
59
57
61
57
53
53
58
55
52
56
56
56
56
54
62
57
48
54
58
58
55
55
56
58
56
55
58
56
53
54
56
52
50
55
56
56
57
55
63
56
54
54
59
59
53
59
57
55
56
55
59
56
55
53
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
58
n/a
55
n/a
62
59
62
60
58
n/a
n/a
65
n/a
52
56
n/a
59
55
58
56
55
n/a
n/a
59
n/a
51
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
55
60
60
59
58
58
57
57
56
56
56
56
55q
Nunawading East
65+
35-49
Women
Whitehorse
Men
Box Hill
Nunawading West
18-34
Metro
50-64
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Lobbying on behalf of the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 51 Councils asked group: 12
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Lobbying on behalf of the community performance
53
2021 lobbying performance (%)
5
6
4
4
3
4
5
5
6
5
6
4
5
4
5
3
6
5
7
22
25
23
20
26
25
30
25
25
23
20
20
26
23
20
22
27
14
21
28
32
31
34
30
26
33
33
32
31
31
28
25
31
25
36
24
23
24
8
7
9
8
10
9
5
8
12
10
11
7
7
8
9
10
7
10
7
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
1
2
35
28
30
32
29
33
25
25
19
27
31
41
36
32
39
30
33
46
39
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2014 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Lobbying on behalf of the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 51 Councils asked group: 12
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Decisions made in the interest of the community
importance
54
2021 community decisions made importance (index scores)
80
80
79
79
79
79
78
81
78
78
79
77
80
78
75
78
76
76
78
83
75
75
76
74
80
82
81
79
80
79
78
83
78
77
79
76
79
79
78
79
78
78
78
83
77
75
78
76
80
79
77
79
81
78
79
79
77
77
80
77
80
n/a
n/a
80
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
81p
81
80
80
79
78
77
77
77
77
75
74q
State-wide
Women
Nunawading West
Metro
35-49
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
50-64
65+
18-34
Box Hill
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Decisions made in the interest of the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 24 Councils asked group: 7
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Decisions made in the interest of the community
importance
55
2021 community decisions made importance (%)
34
34
32
36
32
35
42
40
40
31
31
27
41
35
38
34
30
44
44
41
45
48
44
40
40
43
44
46
48
41
42
42
42
49
16
15
21
17
17
15
14
15
14
16
20
18
14
18
14
20
15
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
1
4
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Decisions made in the interest of the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 24 Councils asked group: 7
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Decisions made in the interest of the community
performance
56
2021 community decisions made performance (index scores)
62
63
59
61
59
62
61
65
60
60
54
53
59
62
57
61
60
62
60
65
56
61
51
55
55
60
55
59
58
57
58
63
56
61
52
54
59
61
56
55
58
62
59
66
54
58
54
54
58
63
53
56
59
55
57
62
51
55
52
54
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
59
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
57
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
62
61
61
61
61
61
60
59
59
58
57
56q
Women
Nunawading East
35-49
65+
Metro
Box Hill
Whitehorse
18-34
Nunawading West
Men
50-64
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Decisions made in the interest of the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Decisions made in the interest of the community
performance
57
2021 community decisions made performance (%)
8
8
8
8
7
6
8
9
9
7
7
7
8
5
11
4
11
32
35
33
30
34
29
32
36
28
35
34
31
33
32
35
31
29
28
32
30
31
30
32
32
29
30
24
30
31
25
27
28
29
29
10
6
8
11
10
8
13
9
10
9
10
11
8
11
8
11
9
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
4
4
4
1
3
3
1
5
3
3
20
16
17
17
16
18
9
13
19
22
19
17
23
24
15
22
19
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Decisions made in the interest of the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The condition of sealed local roads in your area
importance
58
2021 sealed local roads importance (index scores)
78
79
81
78
75
77
77
79
79
77
72
74
77
79
78
77
77
77
77
77
75
75
75
77
77
80
78
78
75
78
76
78
75
75
74
76
76
78
78
81
76
77
76
77
75
76
74
75
76
78
76
73
77
76
76
74
80
77
75
73
n/a
76
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
80p
79p
78
78
78
78
76
76
76
75
74
73
65+
State-wide
Women
50-64
Box Hill
Metro
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
35-49
Nunawading West
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘The condition of sealed local roads in your area’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 24 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The condition of sealed local roads in your area
importance
59
2021 sealed local roads importance (%)
32
32
30
31
30
28
38
33
30
36
32
27
38
29
35
34
34
42
48
47
43
47
50
43
45
43
43
39
43
40
36
37
45
51
24
18
22
23
20
19
16
18
24
20
27
27
21
33
26
17
14
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘The condition of sealed local roads in your area’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 24 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The condition of sealed local roads in your area
performance
60
2021 sealed local roads performance (index scores)
73
69
72
67
72
69
67
65
65
69
67
54
72
69
72
72
72
72
71
72
73
71
69
56
67
72
67
66
73
70
71
73
72
70
68
53
73
73
73
71
74
73
72
72
74
70
66
53
71
72
73
72
73
73
75
74
77
72
67
54
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
72
72
71
71
71
69
69
69
69
68q
57q
35-49
50-64
Women
Box Hill
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
Men
18-34
65+
Metro
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘The condition of sealed local roads in your area’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The condition of sealed local roads in your area
performance
61
2021 sealed local roads performance (%)
26
23
27
27
27
26
13
21
24
29
25
24
28
20
29
28
29
44
41
44
40
43
47
34
43
49
40
41
45
43
49
49
40
34
20
24
19
22
21
20
28
23
17
21
22
18
21
19
14
24
25
7
8
6
7
5
4
15
9
8
6
7
9
6
7
7
7
7
3
2
2
3
2
1
9
3
2
3
4
4
2
3
2
5
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘The condition of sealed local roads in your area’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Informing the community importance
62
2021 informing community importance (index scores)
77
75
76
76
72
73
72
71
70
74
69
69
72
75
72
69
73
71
73
76
70
71
69
70
73
75
74
71
73
72
72
74
71
71
71
69
73
74
75
70
73
71
76
72
72
68
70
68
75
76
79
74
74
74
77
75
74
70
76
70
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
78p
77p
76
75
75
73
73
72
72
72
71
70
65+
State-wide
Women
Nunawading West
Metro
Whitehorse
50-64
Box Hill
Nunawading East
35-49
18-34
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Informing the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 27 Councils asked group: 9
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Informing the community importance
63
2021 informing community importance (%)
28
26
26
26
23
29
35
31
31
27
26
25
31
25
30
27
32
41
44
38
42
47
46
41
41
41
39
43
38
44
38
37
41
48
25
24
28
25
24
18
19
23
21
29
26
28
22
30
26
30
16
4
5
6
5
6
5
3
4
5
3
4
6
2
6
7
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Informing the community’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 27 Councils asked group: 9
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Informing the community performance
64
2021 informing community performance (index scores)
61
62
59
59
61
65
64
63
62
66
65
65
65
62
58
60
63
66
68
64
63
63
64
68
61
61
60
59
61
63
62
62
61
62
63
64
62
61
58
59
59
63
61
61
58
63
63
60
56
63
60
59
57
62
59
61
60
60
67
66
n/a
64
n/a
61
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
62
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
61
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
60
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
62p
61
60
60
59
59
59
58
58
57
55
35-49
Metro
50-64
State-wide
Nunawading West
Women
Box Hill
Whitehorse
Men
65+
Nunawading East
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Informing the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 35 Councils asked group: 10
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Informing the community performance
65
2021 informing community performance (%)
11
14
15
13
11
10
13
14
12
11
12
11
12
7
16
17
10
31
38
36
38
37
40
36
37
32
34
27
31
31
29
36
24
33
34
31
30
32
34
32
31
31
34
30
38
35
32
37
32
33
32
13
9
9
11
10
10
12
11
11
15
13
12
13
15
9
16
12
5
3
2
3
4
3
5
3
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
1
6
6
5
7
3
5
5
3
4
7
5
5
6
6
6
4
9
7
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Informing the community’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 35 Councils asked group: 10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Enforcement of local laws importance
66
2021 law enforcement importance (index scores)
77
76
71
73
70
71
72
71
71
66
75
67
73
72
73
71
71
76
71
70
68
70
71
70
72
74
73
73
71
73
71
68
69
72
73
68
75
74
72
73
71
69
72
69
72
72
70
69
71
75
71
74
70
73
72
71
71
75
74
70
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
76
75
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
71
66
n/a
71
72
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
71
71
70
70
69
69
68
68
67
67
66
65+
Women
Metro
Nunawading West
State-wide
Box Hill
Whitehorse
35-49
Nunawading East
18-34
50-64
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Enforcement of local laws’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 25 Councils asked group: 7
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Enforcement of local laws importance
67
2021 law enforcement importance (%)
21
26
28
24
25
26
24
25
27
20
20
24
17
25
21
20
20
22
40
42
36
43
43
44
42
38
38
41
43
37
39
41
32
43
40
49
29
23
26
28
25
22
27
28
26
30
29
26
32
26
34
27
29
24
6
6
7
5
6
5
6
6
6
3
5
10
6
5
6
7
8
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
3
2
5
2
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Enforcement of local laws’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 25 Councils asked group: 7
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Enforcement of local laws performance
68
2021 law enforcement performance (index scores)
67
65
67
66
64
68
66
66
65
63
66
66
68
61
71
62
68
66
65
64
64
64
64
63
65
62
69
62
63
68
65
65
64
64
66
65
65
65
70
62
59
67
65
66
64
64
60
64
65
66
71
56
65
65
65
64
64
63
64
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
66
66
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
n/a
68
64
69
63
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
n/a
65
68
65
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
n/a
n/a
70p
68
67
67
67
66
66
66
66
64
64
63
Women
50-64
18-34
35-49
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Whitehorse
Nunawading West
Metro
State-wide
65+
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Enforcement of local laws’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Enforcement of local laws performance
69
2021 law enforcement performance (%)
12
14
12
11
14
12
11
12
12
12
13
12
10
15
15
8
13
13
38
36
40
41
38
33
43
39
40
41
34
38
38
38
37
49
36
31
26
27
26
23
21
25
23
26
26
27
24
26
30
22
30
25
25
23
5
6
5
6
9
5
6
7
6
5
5
4
8
2
5
4
2
7
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
4
17
15
14
16
14
22
15
12
14
13
22
17
12
22
13
14
21
23
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Enforcement of local laws’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Family support services importance
70
2021 family support importance (index scores)
75
75
79
76
73
71
76
73
72
73
68
71
74
75
77
72
74
78
69
73
74
74
69
73
74
75
78
74
77
73
75
74
72
74
70
72
73
73
78
72
81
77
75
75
71
74
72
73
73
73
78
70
77
71
73
73
73
76
69
74
73
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
75
74
67
n/a
n/a
69
68
n/a
63
71
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
76
76
76
76
75
75
74
74
74
74
73
70
State-wide
Metro
Women
65+
18-34
Box Hill
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
35-49
Nunawading East
Men
50-64
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Family support services’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 20 Councils asked group: 6
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Family support services importance
71
2021 family support importance (%)
30
28
29
28
30
27
19
34
33
31
30
31
26
35
34
30
26
29
42
43
40
42
44
45
49
40
41
42
43
40
44
40
38
43
39
46
21
23
23
25
20
20
24
20
20
21
22
21
23
20
23
21
24
20
3
3
6
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
4
4
5
1
2
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
4
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
4
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Family support services’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 20 Councils asked group: 6
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Family support services performance
72
2021 family support performance (index scores)
73
77
72
68
72
72
69
66
70
67
71
72
71
70
72
67
70
70
69
67
70
69
68
69
70
72
71
66
69
70
68
66
65
71
67
69
70
73
73
70
72
69
68
67
69
74
70
75
73
71
71
66
69
70
69
66
70
66
68
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
68
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
68
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
73
67
71
73
n/a
67
n/a
n/a
69
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72p
71
70
68
67
67
67
66
66
64
64
63q
65+
Nunawading East
Women
50-64
Whitehorse
35-49
Metro
State-wide
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Family support services’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 6
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Family support services performance
73
2021 family support performance (%)
10
15
13
13
13
10
11
11
10
10
9
12
6
14
7
12
9
14
26
32
30
25
30
34
41
31
27
23
23
34
27
26
23
29
19
31
21
17
18
20
17
17
16
21
21
24
24
14
22
20
30
22
17
11
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
5
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
39
34
36
40
38
36
30
31
37
39
40
37
41
36
37
33
53
40
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Family support services’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 6
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Elderly support services importance
74
2021 elderly support importance (index scores)
81
82
80
79
78
77
76
76
73
70
72
74
84
78
80
81
79
79
78
75
81
78
75
75
78
81
79
81
79
78
78
78
78
77
75
76
81
79
78
82
77
81
79
77
79
78
76
78
81
79
78
82
78
79
79
80
77
79
74
77
n/a
n/a
79
n/a
78
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
80
79
79
81
n/a
n/a
77
n/a
n/a
75
72
74
n/a
n/a
80
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
83
82p
82p
81
81p
80
78
78
77
77
76
74
50-64
65+
State-wide
Women
Metro
Nunawading East
Whitehorse
Nunawading West
Box Hill
18-34
Men
35-49
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Elderly support services’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 21 Councils asked group: 7
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Elderly support services importance
75
2021 elderly support importance (%)
37
30
34
33
37
33
31
43
41
36
36
39
30
43
36
30
43
41
43
46
45
47
43
49
48
42
42
43
43
45
46
41
40
43
45
47
15
19
17
17
18
13
17
12
14
13
18
16
19
12
17
23
11
9
2
2
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
3
2
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Elderly support services’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 21 Councils asked group: 7
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Elderly support services performance
76
2021 elderly support performance (index scores)
77
70
73
71
68
73
71
68
70
69
67
68
73
69
70
73
67
70
70
68
69
70
67
70
73
66
71
70
73
73
70
68
68
70
67
70
73
67
68
70
66
71
69
68
66
70
67
68
75
72
73
70
60
73
70
68
68
67
69
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
69
74
n/a
68
n/a
72
69
n/a
69
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75p
72
72
71
71
70
70
69
68
67
66q
64q
65+
50-64
Women
Box Hill
35-49
Nunawading East
Whitehorse
State-wide
Nunawading West
Men
Metro
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Elderly support services’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 32 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Elderly support services performance
77
2021 elderly support performance (%)
12
16
13
13
14
13
13
16
11
12
10
13
9
14
4
10
13
23
30
26
31
29
25
27
33
32
28
25
32
36
30
31
34
28
21
32
20
16
18
17
18
16
17
20
19
25
18
16
24
17
29
17
15
15
2
3
2
2
4
3
2
5
4
2
1
4
2
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
35
38
36
38
39
40
34
26
36
36
39
30
35
36
31
44
49
27
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Elderly support services’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 32 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Recreational facilities importance
78
2021 recreational facilities importance (index scores)
76
78
72
72
72
72
74
71
72
66
70
64
72
77
72
70
72
71
71
71
72
71
70
68
73
76
72
70
73
74
74
72
73
69
72
71
74
75
72
73
73
72
72
72
72
73
72
68
77
76
77
71
73
76
71
75
73
77
72
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
74
75
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
72
n/a
66
68
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
79p
79
76
75
74
74
74
74
74
73
71
67q
35-49
50-64
Women
65+
Metro
Box Hill
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
State-wide
Nunawading East
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Recreational facilities’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 33 Councils asked group: 10
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Recreational facilities importance
79
2021 recreational facilities importance (%)
26
23
21
20
22
29
21
26
27
27
28
24
21
32
20
37
35
21
45
45
46
50
47
45
45
46
46
44
44
46
46
44
33
44
46
59
26
26
28
26
28
23
29
24
23
28
21
28
29
23
40
18
17
18
3
5
4
1
2
3
4
3
3
2
5
2
4
1
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Recreational facilities’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 33 Councils asked group: 10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Recreational facilities performance
80
2021 recreational facilities performance (index scores)
79
77
75
74
75
73
75
76
74
72
72
70
81
78
76
75
74
79
77
78
74
77
76
70
78
74
76
74
79
77
76
72
75
75
78
69
78
76
79
73
75
74
76
78
79
70
75
70
80
77
76
73
78
73
75
75
71
76
74
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
79
75
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
72
74
73
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
78
78p
77
75
74
74
74
74
73
71
71
71q
65+
Women
50-64
Metro
Nunawading East
Box Hill
Whitehorse
Nunawading West
35-49
18-34
Men
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Recreational facilities’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 42 Councils asked group: 11
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Recreational facilities performance
81
2021 recreational facilities performance (%)
27
27
30
26
27
27
25
23
27
25
28
29
23
31
23
22
35
33
43
45
46
47
49
46
49
43
44
45
40
42
41
44
40
51
36
42
22
21
15
17
16
17
20
22
19
25
21
19
27
17
30
19
22
14
3
2
2
1
4
3
2
6
3
1
3
5
5
1
3
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
4
6
7
5
6
4
4
5
4
7
4
3
7
4
2
6
9
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Recreational facilities’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 42 Councils asked group: 11
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The appearance of public areas importance
82
2021 public areas importance (index scores)
77
73
76
75
73
74
74
73
71
71
72
69
76
74
72
73
72
73
73
72
69
71
77
70
77
74
74
73
71
74
74
72
71
70
70
69
75
75
74
77
74
74
74
75
76
76
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
76
74
74
72
71
75
72
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
n/a
n/a
75
73
75
74
73
n/a
71
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
76
76
76
76
75
75
74
73
72
72
70q
50-64
Metro
Nunawading West
65+
35-49
Women
State-wide
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
Men
Box Hill
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘The appearance of public areas’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 31 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The appearance of public areas importance
83
2021 public areas importance (%)
26
23
24
22
26
25
24
28
29
31
20
24
23
28
19
34
32
24
46
49
43
45
49
47
47
47
47
43
51
45
46
46
44
38
45
55
26
22
29
31
23
26
26
23
22
23
26
29
29
22
34
25
23
17
2
5
4
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘The appearance of public areas’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 31 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The appearance of public areas performance
84
2021 public areas performance (index scores)
74
69
76
72
73
73
75
74
70
73
72
72
76
75
77
79
74
76
74
75
78
74
76
72
72
73
75
74
73
73
74
71
71
73
75
71
78
73
78
79
76
77
74
79
76
72
76
71
74
75
80
76
72
74
74
70
69
72
73
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
74
70
n/a
76
n/a
74
77
72
n/a
n/a
73
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
78
78
77
77
77
76
76
76
75
74
74
73q
Women
50-64
Nunawading East
18-34
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
65+
35-49
Box Hill
Metro
Men
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘The appearance of public areas’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 40 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The appearance of public areas performance
85
2021 public areas performance (%)
30
26
30
22
32
27
25
27
28
28
28
33
25
35
31
26
33
31
49
47
47
52
47
47
50
46
48
51
48
46
53
45
48
54
47
46
17
21
17
21
17
20
19
19
18
18
16
16
18
16
18
16
17
16
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
4
1
1
4
2
1
2
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘The appearance of public areas’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 40 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Art centres and libraries importance
86
2021 art centres and libraries importance (index scores)
72
73
72
69
71
74
68
65
61
70
65
65
72
66
68
68
72
67
67
69
69
68
65
64
74
67
71
69
67
70
67
65
69
70
65
63
70
67
68
66
66
68
67
65
65
66
64
62
74
68
68
69
67
68
68
69
71
69
66
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
68
62
n/a
66
72
71
n/a
n/a
62
n/a
66
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
66
n/a
75p
73
73
70
70
70
70
69
69
68
67q
66
Women
35-49
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
50-64
65+
Metro
Nunawading East
18-34
Box Hill
State-wide
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Art centres and libraries’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 22 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Art centres and libraries importance
87
2021 art centres and libraries importance (%)
24
21
21
20
13
21
17
19
21
25
25
22
18
30
21
28
28
23
40
45
40
43
47
46
41
40
43
43
36
40
40
40
37
42
35
44
29
26
29
29
30
21
32
31
27
26
29
32
30
28
34
26
27
26
5
6
8
7
8
10
7
8
6
3
9
4
8
2
5
4
8
5
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Art centres and libraries’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 22 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Art centres and libraries performance
88
2021 art centres and libraries performance (index scores)
81
79
79
76
78
77
75
77
74
75
76
73
81
81
79
80
81
78
76
74
74
76
76
78
81
74
78
79
79
77
75
75
74
76
75
78
80
78
75
82
78
79
75
79
73
79
78
78
78
72
71
77
77
74
74
72
72
71
74
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
n/a
n/a
n/a
81
78
n/a
n/a
79
77
n/a
72
73
75
n/a
78
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
81p
77
77
75
74
73
73
73
73
73
70
67q
65+
50-64
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Women
Whitehorse
Metro
35-49
State-wide
Men
Nunawading West
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Art centres and libraries’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 28 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Art centres and libraries performance
89
2021 art centres and libraries performance (%)
23
28
31
28
30
24
28
22
22
18
28
23
20
25
10
22
28
37
39
43
42
42
47
42
42
42
41
38
35
44
41
36
46
38
29
34
19
17
15
15
12
20
18
20
19
23
19
14
19
19
21
24
18
12
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
5
2
3
4
2
6
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
16
10
10
13
10
11
10
13
14
15
16
16
16
16
16
13
23
14
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Art centres and libraries’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 28 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community and cultural activities importance
90
2021 community and cultural activities importance (index scores)
63
61
62
62
57
65
60
56
63
58
57
59
62
60
61
57
61
57
60
61
62
64
58
61
64
61
61
60
64
59
60
60
54
61
56
60
63
61
61
58
60
61
59
58
62
59
55
57
66
62
62
61
66
61
62
62
58
65
58
66
n/a
62
62
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
62
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
63
n/a
62
63
60
n/a
60
n/a
56
n/a
56
61
n/a
n/a
62
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
64p
64p
62
62
62
61
61
61
60
59
57
Women
Metro
State-wide
65+
18-34
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
35-49
Box Hill
Men
50-64
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Community and cultural activities’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 22 Councils asked group: 8
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community and cultural activities importance
91
2021 community and cultural activities importance (%)
13
10
11
12
8
12
10
15
15
17
11
9
12
14
15
14
11
11
33
39
34
30
37
37
36
37
36
31
34
34
28
37
30
32
30
38
41
34
41
45
40
41
40
36
37
37
40
47
43
39
42
42
39
38
10
14
12
11
11
7
10
9
9
10
13
8
13
7
12
8
14
8
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
4
2
3
2
4
5
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Community and cultural activities’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 22 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community and cultural activities performance
92
2021 community and cultural activities performance (index scores)
75
76
72
74
74
73
70
72
74
68
69
70
76
75
75
77
75
74
70
73
71
69
74
73
74
78
76
78
77
75
70
73
75
69
73
74
74
76
74
75
75
74
70
74
74
69
73
74
72
76
74
71
73
73
71
72
76
69
70
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
n/a
79
74
n/a
72
n/a
72
n/a
n/a
72
69
69
66
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
68
n/a
n/a
72p
69
68
68
67
67
66
65
65
65
64
62q
65+
Women
Box Hill
35-49
Nunawading East
Whitehorse
Metro
Nunawading West
50-64
State-wide
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Community and cultural activities’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 28 Councils asked group: 9
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Community and cultural activities performance
93
2021 community and cultural activities performance (%)
13
22
25
24
22
20
19
13
12
12
16
11
9
17
6
16
12
19
34
41
42
45
45
44
44
38
37
33
30
41
36
33
36
41
27
30
24
22
21
20
17
18
23
28
27
27
24
20
28
20
27
20
27
22
6
4
2
1
3
3
3
7
7
5
5
8
6
6
9
5
6
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
22
10
10
10
12
14
9
13
16
22
24
20
21
23
21
15
27
26
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Community and cultural activities’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 28 Councils asked group: 9
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Waste management importance
94
2021 waste management importance (index scores)
86
86
86
86
85
84
84
86
86
84
84
82
86
84
85
87
84
82
83
90
85
84
81
81
85
85
85
84
84
84
83
85
84
83
82
81
78
83
82
82
81
80
81
81
81
80
81
79
82
82
83
83
81
81
82
81
80
79
80
80
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
81
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
80
82
82
n/a
80
n/a
n/a
86
n/a
78
76
79
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
78
87
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
84
82
82q
35-49
65+
Women
Box Hill
Whitehorse
Nunawading East
Metro
50-64
Nunawading West
Men
18-34
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Waste management’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 32 Councils asked group: 10
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Waste management importance
95
2021 waste management importance (%)
50
49
48
46
40
38
38
44
49
51
49
49
50
50
46
59
50
48
39
42
42
44
44
50
46
42
40
35
42
41
37
41
38
32
40
47
10
8
10
10
15
11
14
12
10
11
8
9
12
8
14
9
10
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Waste management’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 32 Councils asked group: 10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Waste management performance
96
2021 waste management performance (index scores)
73
74
77
73
72
72
72
71
69
71
70
65
72
79
78
78
77
79
76
74
80
75
73
68
77
79
81
78
77
76
76
77
75
77
75
70
75
78
78
78
77
79
77
75
76
80
75
71
72
76
77
75
74
72
74
74
76
69
76
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
72
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
65
n/a
72
74
71
n/a
69
n/a
77
70
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
79
77
77
76
75
74
74
74
74
72
72q
69q
50-64
Nunawading East
65+
Men
Whitehorse
Box Hill
Women
Nunawading West
18-34
35-49
Metro
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Waste management’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Waste management performance
97
2021 waste management performance (%)
31
28
36
32
34
29
28
23
27
31
31
32
31
32
25
29
39
38
44
42
42
49
44
44
43
42
43
44
41
47
47
42
52
47
41
34
14
20
16
14
16
21
16
20
19
13
14
16
14
14
12
10
17
20
6
6
4
2
4
5
8
8
6
7
9
2
5
8
9
8
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
4
2
3
1
1
1
2
5
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
3
2
3
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Waste management’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Planning and building permits importance
98
2021 planning and building permits importance (index scores)
83
83
77
78
74
78
75
71
73
71
72
62
81
81
78
77
74
78
76
81
70
71
73
68
79
81
80
77
74
77
77
77
77
71
74
73
79
84
78
75
76
77
76
81
72
72
73
69
79
80
78
80
74
79
76
74
75
71
74
70
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
80p
79
77
76
75
75
74
74
73
73
71
66q
65+
50-64
Women
35-49
Metro
Nunawading West
Whitehorse
Box Hill
Nunawading East
State-wide
Men
18-34
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Planning and building permits’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 23 Councils asked group: 5
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Planning and building permits importance
99
2021 planning and building permits importance (%)
32
33
36
35
35
33
28
33
33
31
31
28
37
19
39
38
39
38
38
34
40
38
41
39
37
38
35
41
39
37
34
35
42
43
21
17
20
18
21
20
24
23
21
26
16
23
20
35
15
14
12
5
7
5
4
3
2
4
4
4
5
7
7
3
8
7
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
2
4
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Planning and building permits’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 23 Councils asked group: 5
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Planning and building permits performance
100
2021 planning and building permits performance (index scores)
57
54
52
53
54
53
54
46
55
54
53
51
59
56
54
52
53
50
51
41
51
51
52
52
55
53
51
50
51
46
50
48
49
43
52
52
57
54
53
50
49
46
51
51
47
46
45
51
59
55
52
50
50
42
54
48
48
39
51
50
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
53
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
54
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
53
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
54
57
55
55
54
54
53
53
53
53
52
52
51q
18-34
Nunawading East
Men
Whitehorse
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
50-64
Women
35-49
65+
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Planning and building permits’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 6
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Planning and building permits performance
101
2021 planning and building permits performance (%)
9
7
8
5
6
5
6
6
11
7
8
11
7
7
11
10
8
22
25
23
23
25
25
23
23
22
23
23
22
22
25
22
24
18
23
27
28
28
23
22
27
25
24
24
22
27
20
27
19
22
24
13
10
14
16
16
17
13
12
10
15
14
13
13
7
18
18
14
8
9
8
9
10
9
8
6
11
6
6
9
7
6
11
8
8
25
22
19
18
20
23
23
27
22
25
27
18
31
29
19
18
27
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Planning and building permits’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 29 Councils asked group: 6
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Environmental sustainability importance
102
2021 environmental sustainability importance (index scores)
79
77
78
76
75
76
75
76
74
76
77
73
75
73
72
75
72
73
79
71
74
75
76
71
79
79
74
74
68
74
74
73
73
74
72
68
76
79
73
73
70
73
74
73
72
70
70
69
79
79
71
74
69
74
73
76
73
72
75
68
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
75
n/a
n/a
64
71
n/a
n/a
72
71
75
67
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
79
77
77
76
76
75
74
74
73
72
72
Women
18-34
Nunawading West
Metro
35-49
Whitehorse
Box Hill
Nunawading East
State-wide
65+
50-64
Men
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Environmental sustainability’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 26 Councils asked group: 10
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Environmental sustainability importance
103
2021 environmental sustainability importance (%)
38
38
32
30
30
31
25
35
37
39
39
34
32
44
41
42
36
31
36
37
39
40
42
42
44
37
38
39
33
36
38
35
35
36
30
40
17
19
20
23
20
19
24
21
18
11
19
22
17
16
18
9
20
20
6
3
6
4
6
5
4
5
4
6
6
6
10
3
4
8
11
5
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
5
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Extremely important Very important Fairly important
Not that important Not at all important Can't say
Q1. Firstly, how important should ‘Environmental sustainability’ be as a responsibility for Council?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 26 Councils asked group: 10
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Environmental sustainability performance
104
2021 environmental sustainability performance (index scores)
66
68
64
62
64
65
64
60
65
65
64
60
67
66
66
64
69
66
64
60
67
69
67
62
68
68
66
64
64
65
64
65
65
64
66
63
70
67
66
64
72
68
66
66
71
70
66
64
67
66
66
64
64
64
62
67
63
63
62
63
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
n/a
69
66
n/a
65
66
n/a
66
67
n/a
66
64
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
65
64
64
64
64
63
63
63
63
62
62
62
Nunawading East
65+
Women
Metro
18-34
Whitehorse
Nunawading West
50-64
Men
Box Hill
35-49
State-wide
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Environmental sustainability’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 11
Note: Please see Appendix A for explanation of significant differences.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Environmental sustainability performance
105
2021 environmental sustainability performance (%)
11
13
14
11
13
13
12
11
13
12
11
11
10
13
9
12
14
13
34
36
36
41
41
35
42
36
35
32
31
40
37
31
37
38
26
30
29
29
30
26
20
29
29
31
30
30
31
26
30
29
32
23
31
30
7
7
5
4
5
6
5
9
7
7
7
7
6
8
8
9
8
4
2
2
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
3
2
2
4
1
6
2
3
16
13
15
15
19
15
11
11
13
16
18
14
14
18
15
12
19
20
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
Very good Good Average Poor Very poor Can't say
Q2. How has Council performed on ‘Environmental sustainability’ over the last 12 months?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 34 Councils asked group: 11
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Detailed
demographics
106
Gender and age profile
107
2021 gender
2021 age
Men49%
Women51%
Whitehorse
9%
25%
25%
13%
28%
Whitehorse
18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+
Men49%
Women51%
Metro
Men49%
Women51%
State-wide
8%
27%
25%
14%
25%
Metro
18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+
6%
19%
23%18%
34%
State-wide
18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+
S3. [Record gender] / S4. To which of the following age groups do you belong?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 66 Councils asked group: 15
Please note that for the reason of simplifying reporting, interlocking age and gender reporting has not been included in this report. Interlocking
age and gender analysis is still available in the dashboard and data tables provided alongside this report.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Household structure
2021 household structure (%)
17
13
3
2
20
25
17
3
Single person living alone
Single living with friends or housemates
Single living with children 16 or under
Single with children but none 16 or under living athome
Married or living with partner, no children
Married or living with partner with children 16 or underat home
Married or living with partner with children but none 16or under at home
Do not wish to answer
108S6. Which of the following BEST describes your household?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 11 Councils asked group: 8
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Years lived in area
109
2021 years lived in area (%)
17
20
21
13
18
12
9
16
15
13
14
18
15
13
67
65
65
73
64
74
78 0
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
2013 Whitehorse
0-5 years 5-10 years 10+ years Can't say
S5. How long have you lived in this area?/How long have you owned a property in this area?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 12 Councils asked group: 5
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Years lived in area
2021 years lived in area (%)
17
20
21
13
18
12
14
22
24
12
11
17
17
36
14
5
1
16
15
13
14
18
15
16
16
15
15
16
19
12
20
24
12
4
18
22
20
25
22
31
22
20
24
20
10
18
19
14
31
26
10
20
21
18
23
20
19
19
19
18
17
25
17
22
24
16
28
14
29
23
28
25
21
24
30
24
18
35
38
29
29
6
15
29
70 1
2021 Whitehorse
2020 Whitehorse
2019 Whitehorse
2018 Whitehorse
2017 Whitehorse
2016 Whitehorse
State-wide
Metro
Nunawading West
Box Hill
Nunawading East
Men
Women
18-34
35-49
50-64
65+
0-5 years 5-10 years 10-20 years 20-30 years 30+ years Can't say
110
S5. How long have you lived in this area?/How long have you owned a property in this area?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 12 Councils asked group: 5
Note: For 2016, the code frame expanded out “10+ years”, to include “10-20 years”,”20-30 years” and “30+ years”. As such, this chart
presents the last five years of data only.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Languages spoken at home
111
2021 languages spoken at home (%)
Languages other than English
25%
English only75%
15
2
1
1
1
1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
4
CHINESE
GREEK
ARABIC
ITALIAN
JAPANESE
SPANISH
VIETNAMESE
DUTCH
GERMAN
HINDI
KOREAN
RUSSIAN
OTHER
Q11. What languages, other than English, are spoken regularly in your home?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 8 Councils asked group: 6
Note: Respondents could name multiple languages so responses may add to more than 100%
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Country of birth
112
2021 country of birth (%)
Countries other than Australia
31%
Australia69%
9
5
2
2
1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
7
CHINA
UNITED KINGDOM
INDIA
NEW ZEALAND
UNITED STATES
CANADA
KOREA
FRANCE
GERMANY
GREECE
OTHER
Q12. Could you please tell me which country you were born in?
Base: All respondents. Councils asked state-wide: 4 Councils asked group: 3
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appendix A:
Index scores,
margins of error
and significant
differences
113
Index Scores
Many questions ask respondents to rate council
performance on a five-point scale, for example, from
‘very good’ to ‘very poor’, with ‘can’t say’ also a
possible response category. To facilitate ease of
reporting and comparison of results over time, starting
from the 2012 survey and measured against the state-
wide result and the council group, an ‘Index Score’ has
been calculated for such measures.
The Index Score is calculated and represented as a
score out of 100 (on a 0 to 100 scale), with ‘can’t say’
responses excluded from the analysis. The ‘%
RESULT’ for each scale category is multiplied by the
‘INDEX FACTOR’. This produces an ‘INDEX VALUE’
for each category, which are then summed to produce
the ‘INDEX SCORE’, equating to ‘60’ in the following
example.
Similarly, an Index Score has been calculated for the
Core question ‘Performance direction in the last 12
months’, based on the following scale for each
performance measure category, with ‘Can’t say’
responses excluded from the calculation.
Appendix A:
Index Scores
SCALE
CATEGORIES% RESULT
INDEX
FACTORINDEX VALUE
Very good 9% 100 9
Good 40% 75 30
Average 37% 50 19
Poor 9% 25 2
Very poor 4% 0 0
Can’t say 1% --INDEX SCORE
60
114
SCALE
CATEGORIES% RESULT
INDEX
FACTORINDEX VALUE
Improved 36% 100 36
Stayed the
same40% 50 20
Deteriorated 23% 0 0
Can’t say 1% --INDEX SCORE
56
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Demographic
Actual
survey
sample
size
Weighted
base
Maximum
margin of error
at 95%
confidence
interval
Whitehorse City
Council500 400 +/-4.4
Men 257 194 +/-6.1
Women 243 206 +/-6.3
Nunawading West 188 162 +/-7.2
Box Hill 155 120 +/-7.9
Nunawading East 157 119 +/-7.8
18-34 years 81 138 +/-11.0
35-49 years 104 99 +/-9.7
50-64 years 100 51 +/-9.8
65+ years 215 112 +/-6.7
The sample size for the 2021 State-wide Local
Government Community Satisfaction Survey for
Whitehorse City Council was n=500. Unless otherwise
noted, this is the total sample base for all reported
charts and tables.
The maximum margin of error on a sample of
approximately n=500 interviews is +/-4.4% at the 95%
confidence level for results around 50%. Margins of
error will be larger for any sub-samples. As an
example, a result of 50% can be read confidently as
falling midway in the range 45.6% - 54.4%.
Maximum margins of error are listed in the table below,
based on a population of 142,900 people aged 18
years or over for Whitehorse City Council, according to
ABS estimates.
Appendix A:
Margins of error
115
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Within tables and index score charts throughout this
report, statistically significant differences at the 95%
confidence level are represented by upward directing
green () and downward directing red arrows ().
Significance when noted indicates a significantly higher
or lower result for the analysis group in comparison to
the ‘Total’ result for the council for that survey question
for that year. Therefore in the example below:
• The state-wide result is significantly higher than
the overall result for the council.
• The result among 50-64 year olds is significantly
lower than for the overall result for the council.
Further, results shown in green and red indicate
significantly higher or lower results than in 2020.
Therefore in the example below:
• The result among 35-49 year olds in the council is
significantly higher than the result achieved among
this group in 2020.
• The result among 18-34 year olds in the council is
significantly lower than the result achieved among
this group in 2020.
Appendix A:
Significant difference reporting notation
2021 overall performance (index scores)
(example extract only)
116
58
54q
57
58
60
66
67p
65+
50-64
35-49
Metro
Whitehorse
18-34
State-wide
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appendix A:
Index score significant difference calculation
117
The test applied to the Indexes was an Independent
Mean Test, as follows:
Z Score = ($1 - $2) / Sqrt (($5^2 / $3) + ($6^2 / $4))
Where:
• $1 = Index Score 1
• $2 = Index Score 2
• $3 = unweighted sample count 1
• $4 = unweighted sample count 2
• $5 = standard deviation 1
• $6 = standard deviation 2
All figures can be sourced from the detailed cross
tabulations.
The test was applied at the 95% confidence interval, so
if the Z Score was greater than +/- 1.954 the scores are
significantly different.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appendix B:
Further project
information
118
Further information about the report and explanations
about the State-wide Local Government Community
Satisfaction Survey can be found in this section
including:
• Background and objectives
• Analysis and reporting
• Glossary of terms
Detailed survey tabulations
Detailed survey tabulations are available in supplied
Excel file.
Contacts
For further queries about the conduct and reporting of
the 2021 State-wide Local Government Community
Satisfaction Survey, please contact JWS Research on
(03) 8685 8555 or via email:
Appendix B:
Further information
119
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The 2021 results are compared with previous years, as
detailed below:
• 2020, n=500 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 30th January – 22nd March.
• 2019, n=500 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 1st February – 30th March.
• 2018, n=400 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 1st February – 30th March.
• 2017, n=400 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 1st February – 30th March.
• 2016, n=400 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 1st February – 30th March.
• 2014, n=400 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 31st January – 11th March.
• 2013, n=400 completed interviews, conducted in the period
of 1st February – 24th March.
Minimum quotas of gender within age groups were
applied during the fieldwork phase. Post-survey
weighting was then conducted to ensure accurate
representation of the age and gender profile of the
Whitehorse City Council area.
Any variation of +/-1% between individual results and
net scores in this report or the detailed survey
tabulations is due to rounding. In reporting, ‘—’ denotes
not mentioned and ‘0%’ denotes mentioned by less
than 1% of respondents. ‘Net’ scores refer to two or
more response categories being combined into one
category for simplicity of reporting.
This survey was conducted by Computer Assisted
Telephone Interviewing (CATI) as a representative
random probability survey of residents aged 18+ years
in Whitehorse City Council.
Survey sample matched to the demographic profile of
Whitehorse City Council as determined by the most
recent ABS population estimates was purchased from
an accredited supplier of publicly available phone
records, including up to 60% mobile phone numbers to
cater to the diversity of residents within Whitehorse City
Council, particularly younger people.
A total of n=500 completed interviews were achieved in
Whitehorse City Council. Survey fieldwork was
conducted in the period of 2th February – 15th March,
2021.
Appendix B:
Survey methodology and sampling
120
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
All participating councils are listed in the State-wide
report published on the DELWP website. In 2021, 66 of
the 79 Councils throughout Victoria participated in this
survey. For consistency of analysis and reporting
across all projects, Local Government Victoria has
aligned its presentation of data to use standard council
groupings. Accordingly, the council reports for the
community satisfaction survey provide analysis using
these standard council groupings. Please note that
councils participating across 2012-2021 vary slightly.
Council Groups
Whitehorse City Council is classified as a Metropolitan
council according to the following classification list:
• Metropolitan, Interface, Regional Centres, Large
Rural & Small Rural.
Councils participating in the Metropolitan group are:
• Banyule, Boroondara, Brimbank, Glen Eira, Greater
Dandenong, Hobsons Bay, Kingston, Knox,
Manningham, Maroondah, Melbourne, Moreland,
Port Phillip, Stonnington and Whitehorse.
Wherever appropriate, results for Whitehorse City
Council for this 2021 State-wide Local Government
Community Satisfaction Survey have been compared
against other participating councils in the Metropolitan
group and on a state-wide basis. Please note that
council groupings changed for 2015, and as such
comparisons to council group results before that time
can not be made within the reported charts.
Appendix B:
Analysis and reporting
121
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
The survey was revised in 2012. As a result:
• The survey is now conducted as a representative
random probability survey of residents aged 18 years
or over in local councils, whereas previously it was
conducted as a ‘head of household’ survey.
• As part of the change to a representative resident
survey, results are now weighted post survey to the
known population distribution of Whitehorse City
Council according to the most recently available
Australian Bureau of Statistics population estimates,
whereas the results were previously not weighted.
• The service responsibility area performance
measures have changed significantly and the rating
scale used to assess performance has also
changed.
As such, the results of the 2012 State-wide Local
Government Community Satisfaction Survey should be
considered as a benchmark. Please note that
comparisons should not be made with the State-wide
Local Government Community Satisfaction Survey
results from 2011 and prior due to the methodological
and sampling changes. Comparisons in the period
2012-2021 have been made throughout this report as
appropriate.
Appendix B:
2012 survey revision
122
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Core, optional and tailored questions
Over and above necessary geographic and
demographic questions required to ensure sample
representativeness, a base set of questions for the
2021 State-wide Local Government Community
Satisfaction Survey was designated as ‘Core’ and
therefore compulsory inclusions for all participating
Councils.
These core questions comprised:
• Overall performance last 12 months (Overall
performance)
• Value for money in services and infrastructure (Value
for money)
• Contact in last 12 months (Contact)
• Rating of contact (Customer service)
• Overall council direction last 12 months (Council
direction)
• Community consultation and engagement
(Consultation)
• Decisions made in the interest of the community
(Making community decisions)
• Condition of sealed local roads (Sealed local roads)
• Waste management
Reporting of results for these core questions can
always be compared against other participating
councils in the council group and against all
participating councils state-wide. Alternatively, some
questions in the 2021 State-wide Local Government
Community Satisfaction Survey were optional. Councils
also had the ability to ask tailored questions specific
only to their council.
Appendix B:
Core, optional and tailored questions
123
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Appendix B:
Analysis and reporting
124
Reporting
Every council that participated in the 2021 State-wide
Local Government Community Satisfaction Survey
receives a customised report. In addition, the state
government is supplied with this State-wide summary
report of the aggregate results of ‘Core’ and ‘Optional’
questions asked across all council areas surveyed,
which is available at:
https://www.localgovernment.vic.gov.au/our-
programs/council-community-satisfaction-survey
Tailored questions commissioned by individual councils
are reported only to the commissioning council and not
otherwise shared unless by express written approval of
the commissioning council.
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
Core questions: Compulsory inclusion questions for all
councils participating in the CSS.
CSS: 2021 Victorian Local Government Community
Satisfaction Survey.
Council group: One of five classified groups,
comprising: metropolitan, interface, regional centres,
large rural and small rural.
Council group average: The average result for all
participating councils in the council group.
Highest / lowest: The result described is the highest or
lowest result across a particular demographic sub-
group e.g. men, for the specific question being
reported. Reference to the result for a demographic
sub-group being the highest or lowest does not imply
that it is significantly higher or lower, unless this is
specifically mentioned.
Index score: A score calculated and represented as a
score out of 100 (on a 0 to 100 scale). This score is
sometimes reported as a figure in brackets next to the
category being described, e.g. men 50+ (60).
Optional questions: Questions which councils had an
option to include or not.
Percentages: Also referred to as ‘detailed results’,
meaning the proportion of responses, expressed as a
percentage.
Sample: The number of completed interviews, e.g. for
a council or within a demographic sub-group.
Significantly higher / lower: The result described is
significantly higher or lower than the comparison result
based on a statistical significance test at the 95%
confidence limit. If the result referenced is statistically
higher or lower then this will be specifically mentioned,
however not all significantly higher or lower results are
referenced in summary reporting.
State-wide average: The average result for all
participating councils in the State.
Tailored questions: Individual questions tailored by
and only reported to the commissioning council.
Weighting: Weighting factors are applied to the sample
for each council based on available age and gender
proportions from ABS census information to ensure
reported results are proportionate to the actual
population of the council, rather than the achieved
survey sample.
Appendix B:
Glossary of terms
125
J00967 Community Satisfaction Survey 2021 – Whitehorse City Council
THERE ARE OVER 6 MILLION PEOPLE IN VICTORIA...
FIND OUT WHAT THEY'RETHINKING.
Contact us
03 8685 8555
John Scales
Founder
Katrina Cox
Director of Client Services
Follow us
@JWSResearch
Mark Zuker
Managing Director