2020 HKDSE Literature in English Briefing Session
Transcript of 2020 HKDSE Literature in English Briefing Session
Dr. Neil DRAVE
Senior Manager (English)
Assessment Development Division
HKEAA
HKDSE 2020 Literature in English – Briefing
Rundown
• Welcome
• Overview of the 2020 exam
• Paper 1
• Paper 2
• SBA: 2020 review & 2021
• Set texts 2022-24
Candidates’ performance
• 254 candidates sat (-10% cf. 2019)
• 3+ c.81% (same as 2019)
• 4+ c.54% (same)
• 5+ c.18.5% (- c.4%)
• Comparable to previous years – fewer high achievers
• Samples of 2020 performance posted on web early November
Questions• Aims
– coverage of important issues– test what candidates know rather than trick them – stimulate critical thinking rather than plot recall– focus on how (technique) as well as what (effect/outcome)– Film technique and language
• Allow for choice of texts to answer on • Part II of Essay paper
– SC/OneCom propose a reduction in no. questions from 8 to 4/5/6
– Teacher survey
Marking scheme
• Aims– indicative only, not model answers
– give markers a sense of the range of answers that might be expected
– quantitative (marks) and qualitative
– appropriate literary terms are included but may not be required to score well
– intended to be used with training and feedback from CE, not a guide to teaching
Mark penalties for incomplete coverage
Genres NOT covered (2019 figure in brackets)
Genre Novel Play Film Stories TOTAL
No. texts 0 6 9 3 18 (14)
Candidates with 1 genremissing
14 (10)
2 genres missing
2(2)
3 genres missing
0 (0)
Blank all/Pt2 0 (0)
Paper 1 EssayPopularity [nq/N] & (Mean score)
Part 1 NovelMB / GG
PlayT / C
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
Pop. (%)Mean (%)
9(--)
11(59)
18(52)
23(53)
27(49)
18(59)
5(--)
1(--)
FilmRD / V
Short Stories
Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14
Pop. (%)Mean
5(--)
2(--)
34(56)
6(--)
4(--)
34(49)
Paper 1 EssayPopularity & (Mean raw score)
Part II
Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Q21 Q22
Pop. (%)Mean
11(55)
11(30)
13(--)
8(--)
1(--)
24(48)
12(52)
18(56)
Paper 1
Strengths
• Essays were generally varied and relevant in content
• Best work was clear, balanced and insightful
• Candidates responded very well to questions on language and technique
Areas for Improvement (1)
• Some blank or very brief answers
• Some candidates not covering all four genres
• Some answers with excessive and unnecessary information
Areas for Improvement (2)
• Lack of attempt to explain or interpret terms and
symbols➢ assuming meanings of key terms were self-evident (e.g. ‘romantic’
(Q16), ‘vice and virtue’ (Q18), ‘illusions’ (Q20))
➢ making assertions about symbolic meanings without elaboration (e.g.
what green as a colour represents in Vertigo)
• Unbalanced answers
Question 4
• Good responses
➢ showed understanding of Daisy and Myrtle as
characters
➢ gave sound reasons why they deserve our sympathy
• Weak responses
➢ gave dubious reasons why characters deserve our sympathy
➢ were inclined to moralise excessively about how Daisy and
Myrtle are ‘immoral’ characters
Question 5
• Question generally well-answered
• Most responses were able to demonstrate how use of language (e.g. puns,
hyperbole, imagery, innuendos, flattery and lies) contributes to Petruchio’s plan
• High-scoring responses gave penetrating analysis, supported by quotations
and examples
• Weak responses relied on describing characters’ actions
Question 11• Very well-answered
• Answers generally showed candidates’ wide-ranging knowledge of
how filmic techniques are used to create suspense
• Advanced answers gave extensive and coherent comments
• Weaker answers tended to be uneven, with some techniques
receiving notable attention while others remained undeveloped
Question 14 (1)
• Few effective answers
• Many answers were filled with superfluous details
• Analyses also tended to be broad-brush and
superficial
Question 14 (2)
• Better answers approached the question from the perspectives
of character and technique
➢ How do characters develop insights as they undergo different
experiences?
➢ How are narrative techniques (flashback, foreshadowing, epiphany etc.)
used to show how characters gain self-understanding?
Question 20 (1)
• Most candidates were able to cope with the topic
• Substantial answers considered how the characters’ illusions
➢ reveal their personality
➢ affect them as a person, their actions and the people around them
➢ tie in with broader themes
Question 20 (2)
• Weak answers
➢ provided a list of examples of the characters’ illusions
➢ described any experience that the characters have as illusory without
any attempt at elaboration
Question 22
• Quite a number of superficial analyses
➢ There was a tendency towards story recount
➢ Some offered simplistic character sketches
• Only a few answers undertook to examine factors other than
personality traits that cause one to achieve, or not achieve, personal
growth
Paper 2 Appreciation Popularity & (Mean score)
A Q1T
Max 40
Q2C
Q3GG
Q4KM
Max 40
B Q5SP
Max 48
Q6SP
Max 48
C Q7UP
Max 32
Q8UP
Max 32
Pop. (%)
Mean (%)
30
(68)
3
(--)
53
(60)
14
(61)
61
(58)
37
(56)
23
(51)
74
(61)
Q1 – 8: Areas for improvement
Give due weight to KEY WORDS in a question:
• Comment on the significance of lines 63-67
• Compare the behaviour of…
• How is the interaction presented?
• Comment on the diction in relation to theme
• Comment on the significance of title
• How does the form add to its effect?
Section A: Critical Analysis (Q1 – 4) Sound knowledge of texts
Areas for improvement
• Spend less time describing circumstances/action and more on inference and examination of the language
• Use fewer (redundant) quotations
• Develop a stronger awareness of the performance aspects of texts
• Pay closer attention to key words in a questione.g. Q1(ii): Comment on the significance of lines 63-67 asks candidates to demonstrate how these lines are important to the scene/play overall, not just a literal explanation.
Section B: Set Poetry Fewer instances of noting superficial features without explaining how their use enhanced the poem • Markers reward comment on the impact of figurative
language, not its identification • Candidates who sustained interwoven comparisons in Q5(1)
and 6(i) were duly rewarded
Areas for improvement5(i) Compare movement and stillness: Overall mistaken assumption that there is movement in (B) and only stillness in (A)
6(i) Discuss the ways in which each poem presents animals: • Very few attempts at contrast • Tended to be separate discussions, merely describing the animals
mentioned and not relating to overall meaning • Majority omitted ‘bucks’ (Poem A) and ‘periwinkles’ (Poem B)
• Concepts relating to relationship between technique and meaning are often hazy or incorrect. These examples are vague, unclear or meaningless:e.g. The personification in 2nd stanza shows a sense of continuity
in nature e.g. Dark imagery is oppressive to show how the speaker glorifies death
• Sharper focus on key words is needed: e.g. 5(iii) How does the form add to its effect?e.g. 6(ii) Comment on the use of repetition
• Literary terminology over-/ inappropriately used
– Diction
– Form
– Theme
– Tone
– Caesura
– Anaphora
– Irony
• Note that poems do not usually have ‘paragraphs’ or ‘sentences’
Section C: Unseen Poem (Q7 & 8)End of April• Many candidates simply reworded the lines. A more perceptive
reading was expected of what ‘such things’ might suggest• Tone was not often properly identified, despite clues in diction
(end/broken/blue/missing/gone)
Temptation• The nature of the addiction was often not identified correctly: it is to
alcohol (line 32 refers to ‘one more bottle’) not drugs, adultery or mobile phones!
• Majority only identified two voices • Some candidates merely rephrased lines without explaining how they
inform our understanding of entire poem
SBA
• Analytical essays on films were the most popular
• Creative writing getting more popular
• Film reviews and book reviews least popular
General advice for teachers
• Choice of portfolios
• Should display a variety of genres
• Students should be encouraged to diversify their topics
• Students from the same school should try to work on different genres and topics
• Teachers are advised to adhere to the curriculum and marking criteria when supervising students
What is a good SBA portfolio?
• A well-defined and focused topic or thesis that provides a framework for discussion
• Avoid using a general noun phrase e.g. differences in gender, patriarchal influence etc. as the title
• Common topic: e.g. exploring entrapment in a text; question of fidelity in Romeo and Juliet
• Key terms need to be defined to contextualise the discussion
Analytical essays (1)
• Should display critical discussion of the topic from different angles or perspectives
• Should demonstrate critical understanding of texts and how literary terms apply
• Should display critical and relevant use of textual materials or filmic/narrative techniques to substantiate central argument
Analytical essays (2)
• Balance of research and original insights
• Wide scope of research (authentic and reliable sources better than Wikipedia, online film reviews or online essays)
• Well-referenced, with proper use of in-text references or footnotes for any quoted materials
Analytical essays (3)
• Purposeful rather than decorative use of pictures or screen shots to illustrate ideas
• Organisation needs to be coherent rather than divided into sections or headings with no connection between them
• Discussion of individual shots should be relevant and contextualised
Technicalities
• Paragraphing – avoid long and wordy paragraphs
• Grammatical and spelling mistakes
• Quantity of screen shots and pictures
• Sources of references and secondary materials
Creative writing• Creative short stories with plausible and
convincing development of plot and characters• Avoid stories that are merely narrative accounts of
events • Stories should be shown rather than told• Writing style and dialogue should go with the
genre or themes of the stories• Effective use of the different elements of story like
setting, symbolism, use of suspense, dialogue etc.• Stories that come to a convincing ending
SBA administration
• 2020 SBA
– Efficiency of process
– Reliability of marking: 25 schools as expected, 1 school gave slightly higher marks
• 2021 SBA Cancelled
• 2023 SBA Handbook on web http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/sba/sub_info_sba/dse_subject.html?17&2
• 2021 Examination (24 April)– Paper 1 Essay (62%, 3 hours) – Paper 2 Appreciation (38% 2
hours)– SBA (Cancelled)
• 2021 Texts – replacements– Educating Rita (Crucible)– How to become a
writer/Temporary matter (Cathedral/Everyday use)
– Blake (Keats)
• Assessment Frameworks
– 2023 on web http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/hkdse/assessment/subject_information/category_a_subjects/hkdse_subj.html?A2&2&17_1
– 2022-2024 confirmed
2021 Paper
Set texts 2022, 2023, 2024
Test
year
Teac
h
from
Sept
…
Number of years on syllabus
HL = new
Replace 2 stories per year
(from same volume)
Replace 1 poet per year (3 poems)
Novel Play Film Stories Poets
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5
2022 20
19
Great
Gatsby
4
Rebecc
a
1
Taming
of the
Shrew 5
Educati
ng Rita
2
The
Remain
s of the
Day
3
Vertigo 3 Rip van
Winkle
4 – final
year
Araby 4
– final
year
Memory
3
In the
Americ
an
Society
3
How to
Become
a
Writer
2
Temp
orary
Matte
r 2
Tim
O’Brien
The
Things
They
Carried
1
James
Thurber
The
Secret
Life of
Walter
Mitty
1
Stevens 4 WC
Williams 3
Blake 2 Thomas 5 Hardy 1
Afterwar
ds/Bags
of meat/
Weather
s
2023 20
20
Great
Gatsby
5
Rebecc
a
2
Taming
of the
Shrew 6
– final
year
Educati
ng Rita
3
The
Remain
s of the
Day
4
Vertigo 4 Anita
Desai
Games
at
Twilight
1
Ray
Bradbur
y
The
Veldt
1
Memory
4 – final
year
In the
Americ
an
Society
4 – final
year
How to
Become
a
Writer
3
Temp
orary
Matte
r 3
Tim
O’Brien
The
Things
They
Carried
2
James
Thurber
The
Secret
Life of
Walter
Mitty
2
Stevens 5 WC
Williams 4
Blake 3 EE
Cummings 1
Buffalo
Bill’s/Maggi
e and millie
and mollie
and
may/nobod
y loses all
the time
Hardy 2
2024 20
21
Great
Gatsby
6 –
final
year
Rebecc
a
3
Mercha
nt of
Venice1
Educati
ng Rita
4
The
Remain
s of the
Day
5
Vertigo 5
(could
change
this year
instead)
Anita
Desai
Games
at
Twilight
2
Ray
Bradbur
y
The
Veldt
2
Roald
Dahl
Parson’s
Pleasure
1
Kate
Chopin
The
Story of
an Hour
1
How to
Become
a
Writer
4 – final
year
Temp
orary
Matte
r 4 –
final
year
Tim
O’Brien
The
Things
They
Carried
3
James
Thurber
The
Secret
Life of
Walter
Mitty
3
Emily
Dickinson
1
Like Rain it
sounded/T
here came
a
wind/Ther
e’s a
certain
Slant of
light
WC
Williams 4
Blake 4 EE
Cummings 2
Hardy 3