2016 UPDATE ON CLASS SIZE, OVERCROWDING, AND ......2016/02/22  · D2 D3 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13...

22
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters February 22, 2016 2016 UPDATE ON CLASS SIZE, OVERCROWDING, AND CAPITAL PLAN DISTRICT 30 AND CITYWIDE

Transcript of 2016 UPDATE ON CLASS SIZE, OVERCROWDING, AND ......2016/02/22  · D2 D3 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13...

  • Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters

    February 22, 2016

    2016 UPDATE ON CLASS SIZE,

    OVERCROWDING, AND CAPITAL PLAN

    DISTRICT 30 AND CITYWIDE

  • School Utilization Rates and Class Sizes

    at critical levels • Citywide, schools have become more overcrowded over last six years.

    More than 556,000 students citywide (53% of NYC’s student population) are in overcrowded buildings.

    • Elementary schools city wide average building utilization rate is 103.5%

    • Large classes continue to increase, with number of K-3 students in

    classes of 30 or more doubling in the past five years

    • More than 350,000 NYC school kids are in classes of 30 or more

    • Class size averages have increased sharply citywide and in D30 since 2007, far above Contracts for Excellence goals of no more than 20 pupils in grades K-3, 23 in grades 4-8, and 25 in grades 9-12.

  • 103.5%

    84.0%

    95.3%

    107.0%

    85.0% 92.0%

    0.0%

    20.0%

    40.0%

    60.0%

    80.0%

    100.0%

    120.0%

    Elementary School City Wide Middle School City Wide High School City Wide

    Citywide School Utilization Averages Over 556,000 NYC Students are in overcrowded classes and about 53%

    are in overcrowded buildings Mean

    Median

    *IS/PS Schools are counted as Elementary Schools, and Secondary Schools are counted as Middle Schools

    Source: 2014-2015 DOE Blue Book

  • 24,417

    35,137

    45,242 45,442 48,440

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

    Trend of K-3 Students in classes of 30 or more The number has nearly doubled in the past five years

    Data Source: DOE Citywide Class Size Distribution data, 2011-15

  • Class sizes in D30 have increased in grades K-3

    by 16.9% since 2007 and are now far above C4E goals

    Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006-Fall 2015, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

    21

    20.7 20.5 20.3 20.1 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9

    21 20.9 21.4

    22.1

    22.9

    23.9 24.5

    24.9 24.7 24.6

    21.8 21.3 21.9

    22.4 23.2

    24.4 25

    25.9 25.1 24.9

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    Baseline 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

    Ave

    rag

    e S

    tud

    en

    ts p

    er

    se

    cti

    on

    D30 K-3 class sizes over time, way above C4E goals

    C4E goals

    citywide actual

    D30

  • D30’s class sizes in grades 4-8 have increased by 3.9%

    since 2007 and are now far above C4E goals

    Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006-Fall 2015, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

    25.6

    24.8 24.6

    23.8 23.3

    22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9

    25.6 25.1 25.3 25.8

    26.3 26.6 26.7 26.8 26.7 26.7

    26.0 25.7

    26.0 26.6

    27.2 27.6 27.4 27.6

    26.8 26.7

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Baseline 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

    Ave

    rag

    e S

    tud

    en

    ts p

    er

    se

    cti

    on

    D30 4-8 class sizes, way above C4E goals

    C4E target

    citywide actual

    D30

  • 26.1 26.2

    26.6 26.5 26.4 26.3

    26.7 26.8 26.7

    26

    25.7

    25.2

    24.8

    24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5

    23

    23.5

    24

    24.5

    25

    25.5

    26

    26.5

    27

    2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

    Citywide HS class size trend compared to C4E goals

    Citywide Actual

    C4E Target

    *DOE’s methodology for calculating HS averages has changed year to year

    Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006-Fall 2015, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

    Class sizes citywide have increased in High School

    since 2007 and are now far above C4E goals

  • Examples of schools in D30 with large class sizes, K-3 in 2015-16

    29 28

    27 27 27 26 26 26

    25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    P.S

    . 11

    2 D

    UTC

    H K

    ILLS

    P.S

    . 12

    7 A

    ero

    spac

    e…

    East

    Elm

    hu

    rst…

    P.S

    . 22

    8 E

    arly

    P.S

    . 28

    0

    P.S

    . 15

    0 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 16

    6 H

    ENR

    Y…

    The

    30

    th A

    ven

    ue…

    P.S

    . 01

    7 H

    ENR

    Y D

    AV

    ID…

    P.S

    . 06

    9 J

    AC

    KSO

    N…

    P.S

    . 08

    5 J

    UD

    GE…

    P.S

    . 09

    2 H

    AR

    RY

    T.…

    P.S

    . 11

    1 J

    AC

    OB

    P.S

    . 12

    2 M

    AM

    IE F

    AY

    P.S

    . 14

    8 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 21

    2

    P.S

    . 36

    1

    P.S

    . Q2

    22

    - F

    ire…

    D30 Kindergartan

    33

    32 32 32 32 32 32

    31 31 31 31 31 31 31

    30 30 30

    29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34

    P.S

    . 14

    8 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 011

    KA

    THR

    YN…

    P.S

    . 069

    JA

    CK

    SON

    P.S

    . 12

    2 M

    AM

    IE F

    AY

    P.S

    . 15

    1 M

    AR

    Y D

    .…

    P.S

    . 17

    1 P

    ETER

    G. V

    AN

    P.S

    . 23

    4

    P.S

    . 00

    2 A

    LFR

    ED…

    P.S

    . 085

    JU

    DG

    E…

    P.S

    . 09

    2 H

    AR

    RY

    T.…

    P.S

    . 12

    7 A

    ero

    spac

    e…

    P.S

    . 14

    9 C

    HR

    ISTA

    P.S

    . 152

    Gw

    en

    do

    line…

    P.S

    . 166

    HEN

    RY…

    P.S

    . 069

    JA

    CK

    SON

    P.S

    . 22

    8 E

    arly

    P.S

    . 28

    0

    D30 Second Grade

    32 31 31 31 31

    30 30 30 29 29 29 29 29

    28 28 28 28

    26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

    P.S

    . 12

    2 M

    AM

    IE…

    P.S

    . 07

    6…

    P.S

    . 09

    2 H

    AR

    RY…

    P.S

    . 14

    9…

    P.S

    . 28

    0

    P.S

    . 06

    9…

    P.S

    . 14

    8 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 15

    2…

    P.S

    . 01

    1…

    P.S

    . 07

    0 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 15

    0 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 16

    6 H

    ENR

    Y…

    The

    30

    th…

    East

    Elm

    hu

    rst…

    P.S

    . 08

    5 J

    UD

    GE…

    P.S

    . 11

    1 J

    AC

    OB

    P.S

    . 21

    2

    D30 First Grade

    32 32 32 32 32 32 32

    31 31 31 31 31 31 31

    30 30

    29

    30

    30

    31

    31

    32

    32

    33

    P.S

    . 011

    KA

    THR

    YN…

    P.S

    . 06

    9 J

    AC

    KSO

    N…

    P.S

    . 122

    MA

    MIE

    FA

    Y

    P.S

    . 14

    8 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 151

    MA

    RY

    D.…

    P.S

    . 171

    PET

    ER G

    .…

    P.S

    . 234

    P.S

    . 002

    ALF

    RED

    P.S

    . 085

    JU

    DG

    E…

    P.S

    . 092

    HA

    RR

    Y T.

    P.S

    . 149

    CH

    RIS

    TA…

    P.S

    . 15

    0 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 152

    P.S

    . 166

    HEN

    RY…

    P.S

    . 07

    0 Q

    UEE

    NS

    P.S

    . 280

    D30 Third Grade

    Data sources: DOE Class Size Report Fall 2015

  • Proposed new capital plan vs. needs for seats • New proposed capital plan has about 49,000 K12 seats (compared to 33,000 in

    May plan) – at an additional total cost of nearly $1 billion.

    • DOE now admits real need of approximately 83,000 seats (compared to DOE

    estimate in May of 49,245).

    • Thus DOE is only funding 59% of need for seats according to its own projected

    need.

    • Many of those seats remain unsited even as to borough and district.

    • CSM estimates real need is over 100,000 seats, based on enrollment

    projections and existing overcrowding – with about 40,000 seats needed in

    districts with utilization averages over 100%, plus 60K-70K more for projected

    enrollment growth.

    • DOE should fund at least their own estimated need of 83,000 seats at an

    additional cost of $130 million per year in city funds.

  • Over-utilization in ES and MS buildings in

    District 30, and Queens HS

    • D30’s Elementary School building utilization average is 112.3%,–much higher than the citywide utilization average of 103.5%

    • D30’s High School building utilization average is 109.1%,- much higher than the citywide utilization average of 95.3%.

    • 25 ES and MS school buildings in CSD 30 are over-utilized. About 4,048 seats are needed for these buildings to reach 100% utilization.

    • In Queens, 26 high school buildings are at or over 100% building utilization - with 13,295 additional seats needed.

    *IS/PS Schools are counted as Elementary Schools, and Secondary Schools are counted as Middle Schools

    Source: 2014-2015 DOE Blue Book

  • Average Utilization Rates in D30 compared to City-Wide 2014-15,

    1,756 seats needed to bring D30 average utilization to 100%

    *Calculated by dividing building enrollment by the target capacity

    Source: 2014-2015 DOE Blue Book

    112.3%

    103.5%

    87.2% 84.0%

    109.1%

    95.3%

    0.0%

    20.0%

    40.0%

    60.0%

    80.0%

    100.0%

    120.0%

    D30 ElementarySchool

    City WideElementary

    School

    D30 MiddleSchool

    City WideMiddle School

    D30 High School City Wide HighSchool

  • 25 ES and MS Buildings in D30 are over-utilized about 4,048 seats needed to reduce all over utilized buildings to 100% -

    but only 4,536 in cap plan - does not account for projected new enrollment

    *IS/PS Schools are counted as Elementary Schools, and Secondary Schools are counted as Middle Schools

    Source: 2014-2015 DOE Blue Book

    221%

    192%

    155% 148% 136% 133% 129% 126% 126% 125% 125% 123% 123% 121% 120% 113% 112% 110% 110% 110%

    0%

    50%

    100%

    150%

    200%

    250%

    20 examples of D30’s over crowded school buildings, there are 25 in total

  • 26 Queens HS buildings are over-utilized About *13,295 new seats needed to bring these school buildings to 100% but only 2,802 seats funded in cap plan

    *IS/PS Schools are counted as Elementary Schools, and Secondary Schools are counted as Middle Schools

    Source: 2014-2015 DOE Blue Book

    D30 School

    Buildings in gold

    140% 151%

    107%

    155%

    120% 130%

    139% 156%

    104%

    132%

    160% 147%

    197%

    105% 108% 105% 117%

    193%

    123% 115% 121% 121%

    104%

    129%

    0%

    50%

    100%

    150%

    200%

    250%

  • 3,190

    692 456 456

    0

    3,016

    640 912

    2,593

    991

    3,840

    1,000

    4,869

    912

    456

    4,869

    2,221

    924 972

    1,920

    4,536

    1,736

    -

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    D2 D3 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 D19 D20 D21 D22 D24 D25 D26 D27 D28 D30 D31

    Total Funded K-8 Seats In January 2016 Capital Plan by District 4,536 seats in D30

    Data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016

  • Number of seats added in the January Capital Plan 2,624 seats were added in D30

    Data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016

  • 4,536

    5,975 5,825

    -

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    ES and MS New Seats fromJanuary 2016 Capital Plan

    DOE Identified Need fromJanuary 2016 Capital Plan

    Class Size Matters EstimatedTotal Need*

    District 30, Grades K-8

    District 30 includes sub-district Astoria/Steinway, which has some seats funded for design but

    not construction. The neighborhood Long Island City is being rezoned to increase residential

    development.

    *Class Size Matters Estimated Total Need derived from seats needed to bring district average down to 100% utilization plus

    Estimated Enrollment based on Housing Starts 2012-2021 and the average of consultant projections (Grier Partnership 2011-2021

    and Statistical Forecasting 2011-2021.) Additional data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016, Blue Book 2014-2015.

    New Capital Plan Seats and DOE Seat Need

    vs Class Size Matters Estimated Need

  • Data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016

    99% 100%

    44% 44%

    0%

    53%

    26%

    61%

    76%

    63%

    51%

    100%

    47%

    37% 35%

    52%

    43% 37%

    56% 53%

    76%

    52%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    D2 D3 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 D19 D20 D21 D22 D24 D25 D26 D27 D28 D30 D31

    Funded Seats in Jan. 2016 Capital Plan compared to DOE's Identified Need by District (K-8 Only) –

    76% of D30’s seat need is funded

  • *Class Size Matters Estimated Total Need derived from seats needed to bring district average down to 100% utilization plus

    Estimated Enrollment based on Housing Starts 2012-2021 and the average of consultant projections (Grier Partnership 2011-2021

    and Statistical Forecasting 2011-2021.) Additional data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016, Blue Book 2014-2015.

    2,802

    6,880

    24,488

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    30,000

    HS New Seatsfrom January 2016

    Capital Plan

    DOE IdentifiedNeed from

    January 2016Capital Plan

    Class Size MattersEstimated Total

    Need*

    New Capital Plan and DOE Seat Need vs Class Size Matters Estimated Need for Queens High

    Schools

    Queens High Schools and the Capital Plan

    12%

    41%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    45%

    Queen High School % ofSeats Funded comparedto CSM's Estimated Need

    Queen High School % ofSeats Funded comparedto DOE's Estimated Need

    Queens HS funded seats compared to estimations of DOE and CSM

  • 46%

    100%

    0%

    33%

    0%

    9%

    0% 0%

    28%

    0% 7%

    0% 7%

    19%

    0%

    31%

    12% 19%

    35%

    23%

    8% 7%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    D2

    D3

    D7

    D8

    D9

    D1

    0

    D1

    1

    D1

    2

    D1

    3

    D1

    4

    D1

    5

    D1

    9

    D2

    0

    D2

    1

    D2

    2

    D2

    4

    D2

    5

    D2

    6

    D2

    7

    D2

    8

    D3

    0

    D3

    1

    K-8 Seats in Scope/Design versus DOE Identified Need by District

    *Scope/Design means that the seats are in the process of getting sited and constructed, as opposed to only being budgeted for

    Data sources: Capital Plan updated January 2016

    Percent of Seats in Scope/Design* compared to DOE Identified Need Only 15% of DOE’s Identified need are in Scope and Design

    Only 8% of ES and MS seats in D30 and 7% of HS seats in Queens

  • Problems with DOE & SCA capacity to site and build

    schools

    • Only 8% of D 30 seats needed are sited & in scope & design; only 7% Queens HS.

    • After 2 years DOE still has not determined in which borough or district most of

    4900 seats in “class size reduction” category will built.

    • Several overcrowded neighborhoods have had schools funded in the capital plan

    for over a decade without DOE siting or building a single school

    • SCA/DOE has real capacity problems in terms of efficient and accurate school

    siting and planning

    • Overcrowding will grow worse if Mayor’s rezoning plan to accelerate

    residential development is adopted

    • NYC needs to come up with a better process to ensure schools are built along

    with new housing – instead of always playing catch up

  • NYC Council should create a Commission to improve

    efficiency and accuracy of school planning and siting

    • Among issues Commission could consider: do we need reforms to

    the zoning and/or ULURP process?

    • Should the formula used to estimate impact of new housing on

    schools should be updated?

    • Should enrollment projections be improved and carried out on a

    more regular basis?

    • Should NYC require impact fees from developers and/or use

    eminent domain to site schools more frequently?

    • Without reforms to the planning process, overcrowding is likely to

    worsen, with school construction lagging years behind other

    development

  • How you can help • Sign our petition at www.classsizematters.org urging

    Mayor & City Council to expand the capital plan & form a

    Commission to improve school planning

    • Pass a resolution about need for same

    • Come to the capital plan hearings at City Hall on Tuesday

    March 8, at 1 PM to testify about overcrowding in your

    district; public testimony starts at 3 PM.

    • Sign up for our newsletter for updates on this and other

    issues.