2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

36
2014 Inbox Placement Benchmark Review Webinar Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research Return Path @tom_sather @returnpath

description

Join Tom Sather, Sr. Director Email Research, as he provides a look at the latest email deliverability benchmarks across the world, so you can find out how your inbox placement performance compares to other marketers today.

Transcript of 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Page 1: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

2014 Inbox Placement Benchmark Review Webinar Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research Return Path @tom_sather @returnpath

Page 2: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Why You’re Not Reaching Your Goals

Page 3: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Marketing Sherpa, Email Marketing Benchmark Survey, 2013

Page 4: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

If your email doesn’t reach the inbox, you won’t reach your goals

Page 5: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

One-in-Six For every six commercial messages sent worldwide, one never reaches the subscriber’s inbox. ●  6% are sent to the spam folder ●  11% are missing or sent to spam

○  Missed opportunity

Page 6: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Delivered ≠ Inbox

Page 7: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Delivered Rate = (Total Sent – Bounces) / Total Sent

Page 8: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Inbox Placement Rate = (Total Sent – Bounces) – (Spam +

Missing) / Total Sent

Page 9: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

How Email Providers Filter Spam

Page 10: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Content Filters

Page 11: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Sender Reputation Filters

Page 12: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

But how do I know what my sender reputation is?

www.senderscore.org

Page 13: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Better Reputations Lead to Better IPR

Source: Return Path 2012 Sender Score Benchmark Report

Page 14: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Engagement Filters

Page 15: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

What Has (Not) Changed?

Page 16: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

While inbox placement rates are higher today, the inbox is more complicated:

•  Inbox Tabs and Categories •  Productivity tools •  Mobile •  Email Apps

Deliverability not getting easier

Page 17: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Global Inequality

Page 18: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Inbox Placement byIndustry

Winners •  Health and Beauty •  Retail •  Apparel •  Automotive •  Food & Beverage Losers •  Software and Internet •  Technology •  Media &

Entertainment •  Consumer Services

Page 19: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Factors Impacting Inbox Placement Rates

Page 20: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Throughout the year

Page 21: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Three Factors

Page 22: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Volume Effect

Black Friday Christmas

First Week of November

Page 23: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Over half of all emails were opened on smartphones over the 2013 holiday period. Where’s the spam button?

Page 24: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Cheer Effect: As People Look for Holiday Deals, They Read More Email

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Start of the New Year

First Week of November

Page 25: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Primary vs Promotions

Page 26: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Defining Placement in the New Inbox, but Which Inbox?

Source: OtherInbox.com

Page 27: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Applying New Measurement Approaches

Page 28: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Measuring Inbox Placement Rate: Seeding

Page 29: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Today Inbox Placement is Measured using both Seed and Consumer Data

Page 30: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

ACTIVE VS. INACTIVE MAILBOXES MATTER MORE

Source: Return Path, Win-Back Report 2014

Page 31: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

“Think of how you can make the user love

your emails rather than land in the inbox.”

-Gmail

Page 32: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Engagement Factors

Mailbox Providers look for signals that your subscribers love your emails:

•  Messages Read •  Messages Read Multiple Times •  Replies •  Deleted Without Reading •  Forwards •  This is Spam •  This is Not Spam

Page 33: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Target Mobile Users

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

iPad

iPhone OS 7

iPhone OS 8

Source: Return Path, Email Client Monitor

Page 34: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Source: Return Path, Email Client Monitor

Page 35: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Don’t Be Afraid to Increase Frequency

Average # of messages sent per week 5+ 4 3 2 1 Average subscriber spam complaint rate 0.005% 0.020% 0.026% 0.037% 0.571% Average retailer Sender Score 62 86 89 86 83 Average "This is not spam" Rate 0.40% 0.22% 0.73% 0.89% 1.07% Average Inbox Placement Rate 71% 96% 98% 94% 92%

Source: Return Path, Inbox Insight, October – December 2013

Page 36: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Let’s Connect!

Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research

@ReturnPath @Tom_Sather

[email protected]

www.returnpath.com

Contact Us! http://www.returnpath.com/contact-us/