2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

71
NONPROFIT FRAUD: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW PART II: THE DETECTION November 19, 2013 Lawrence J. Hoffman, CPA/CFF, CVA, CFE Senior Partner and Director of Forensic Accounting Services Leslie C. Kirsch, CFE Manager, Forensic Accounting Services

description

Nonprofit Fraud: The Detection

Transcript of 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Page 1: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

NONPROFIT FRAUD: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

PART II: THE DETECTION

November 19, 2013

Lawrence J. Hoffman, CPA/CFF, CVA, CFESenior Partner and Director of Forensic Accounting Services

Leslie C. Kirsch, CFEManager, Forensic Accounting Services

Page 2: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 2

OBJECTIVESNONPROFIT FRAUD: THREE-PART SERIES

PART I: THE FRAUD• Why it is important that you are educated in fraud• The magnitude of fraud in nonprofits• The types of frauds in nonprofits• Why does fraud occur in nonprofits• Some important fraud prevention takeawaysPART II: THE DETECTION• Why do people commit fraud?• How is fraud detected?• Who are the fraud perpetrators?• Fraud detection techniques• What should you do when you uncover fraud?

PART III: THE PREVENTION• Fraud risk assessments• Setting the tone at the top and your board of directors• What are the best preventative measures and controls?• The five critical takeaways!

Page 3: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 3

AGENDA

• Why do people commit fraud?

• How is fraud detected?

• Who are the perpetrators?

• Fraud detection techniques

• What should you do when you uncover a fraud?

Page 4: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 4

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

THREE REASONS WHY PEOPLE COMMIT CRIMES

• Economics $$$$$

• Passion love, lust, a cause (religious beliefs)

• Mental instability nuts

Page 5: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 5

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

Rationalization (frame of mind or ethical character)

Opportunity (lack of controls)

Pressure / Incentive (The “Unshareable” Need)

Page 6: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 6

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE ORIGINATED FROM DR. DONALD CRESSEY'S HYPOTHESIS:

“Trusted persons become trust violators when they conceive of themselves as having a financial problem which is non-shareable, are aware this problem can be secretly resolved by violation of the position of financial trust, and are able to apply to their own conduct in that situation verbalizations which enable them to adjust their conceptions of themselves as trusted persons with their conceptions of themselves as users of the entrusted funds or property.1 ”

 

1DONALD R. CRESSEY, OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY (MONTCLAIR: PATTERSON SMITH, 1973) P. 30.

Page 7: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 7

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

PRESSURE

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 8: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 8

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

PRESSURE / INCENTIVE (THE NEED, PERCEIVED OR ACTUAL)

• Financial pressure and debts• Greed – need for high lifestyle-living beyond their means• Feed a habit – gambling, drugs, other addictive behaviors• Retribution / vendetta – feels abused or exploited-holds a

grudge• Make earnings target or financial metric (bonuses)• Need for praise and gratification• Competitive pressures – keep your job• Medical issues of family or self

Page 9: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 9

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

OPPORTUNITY

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 10: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 10

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

OPPORTUNITY (PERCEIVED)• Weak or non-existent internal controls – lack of segregation of

duties• Has sufficient access to assets and information that enables

the crime• Has assessed that that the fraud can be committed and also

successfully concealed• Too much trust placed in person or position. (Remember: trust

is not an internal control!)• Poor communication within organization• Lack of oversight and supervision• Lack of disciplinary action for previous frauds

Page 11: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 11

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

RATIONALIZATION

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 12: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 12

WHY DO PEOPLE COMMIT FRAUD?

RATIONALIZATION (A WAY TO RATIONALIZE THE BEHAVIOR AS ACCEPTABLE)

• “I am just borrowing the money and will repay it”• “I’ll stop once I pay off my debts”• “The company won’t even realize this amount is gone; it’s not

that much”• They feel they deserve it: “I am getting underpaid and am

underappreciated”• “Management is ‘living high,’ while I am oppressed”• “Everyone’s doing it, I am no different”• “It is for a good purpose”• They need the money

Page 13: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 13

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

WHEN ALL THE ELEMENTS COME TOGETHER

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 14: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 14

HOW IS FRAUD DETECTED?

• The detection of fraud involves the ability to recognize in a timely manner whether fraud has occurred or is occurring

• However, a properly designed and executed audit may still NOT detect material fraud, especially one involving: – Forgery– Deliberate failure to record transactions– Intentional misrepresentations– Collusion

• Ability to detect fraud depends on:– Skillfulness of perpetrator– Frequency and extent of manipulation– Degree of collusion– Relative size of individual amounts manipulated– Seniority of individuals involved

Page 15: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 15

HOW IS FRAUD DETECTED?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

Page 16: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 16

HOW IS FRAUD DETECTED?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

Page 17: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 17

HOW IS FRAUD DETECTED?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

Page 18: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 18

HOW IS FRAUD DETECTED?

KEY TAKEAWAY: ESTABLISH POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND MECHANISMS FOR TIPS!

•Employees•Vendors•Customers•Other stakeholders

Page 19: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 19

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

THE FACES OF FRAUD

Page 20: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 20

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

TYPICAL PROFILE

• Usually living above their means or has an addictive need

• Does not have a prior criminal conviction or charged with a fraud

• Has a position of trust and responsibility

• Most likely a male between the age of 31 to 45

• Is well educated

• Understands and skillfully uses technology

• Usually comes across as a nice person, charming

• Usually well respected

• They usually spend everything they steal!

• 80% will buy a new car!

Page 21: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 21

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

FRAUD PERPETRATORS ARE NOT CAREER CRIMINALS

Page 22: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 22

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

FRAUD PERPETRATORS DO NOT HAVE A PRIOR HISTORY OF BEING PUNISHED OR TERMINATED BY AN EMPLOYER FOR A FRAUD-RELATED OFFENSE

Page 23: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 23

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

FRAUD PERPETRATOR IS TYPICALLY AN EMPLOYEE OR MANAGER

Page 24: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 24

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

LARGER LOSSES WITH THE OWNER/EXECUTIVE

Page 25: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 25

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

MALES TEND TO ACCOUNT FOR ABOUT TWO-THIRDS OF ALL FRAUD CASES

Page 26: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 26

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

TYPICALLY BETWEEN AGES 31 AND 45

Page 27: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 27

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

AMOUNT OF LOSS ROSE WITH AGE!

Page 28: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 28

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

LOSS WAS GREATER WITH TENURE OF PERPETRATOR

Page 29: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 29

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

MORE THAN HALF HAD A COLLEGE DEGREE OR HIGHER!

Page 30: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 30

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT TOPS THE LIST!

Page 31: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 31

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

WHO DID THE FBI PROFILE WITH THESE SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS?

• Anger and arrogance• Capable of acting witty and charming• Good at flattery and manipulating other people’s emotions• Disregards the safety of self and others• Does not show any guilt• Lies, steals, and fights often• Breaks the law repeatedly• Substance abuse and/or legal problems

“Provided a man is not mad, he can be cured of every folly but vanity.”

- Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Page 32: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 32

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

Page 33: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 33

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

BERNIE’S JAIL CELL

Page 34: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 34

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

Page 35: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 35

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER (ASPD OR APD)

• A psychiatric condition in which a person manipulates, exploits, or violates the rights of others

• Usually begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood

• “Boomerang Personality”-everything you throw at them, they throw back at you. It is always the other person’s fault. Will not accept responsibility

• Person with no conscience• Is usually criminal• Also referred to as “sociopaths” and “psychopaths”

Page 36: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 36

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

SOCIOPATHS

• Are unable to experience emotional responses for other people outside of their own personal interests

• Psychological inability to show emotion or caring for others

• While a sociopath can feel emotion, it is (even if it results in care for another), because they find it viable for themselves as opposed to what would be termed as selflessness

Page 37: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 37

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

THE DILEMMA

• Everyone has to a degree a propensity to commit a crime!

• 93-95% of the population may commit a crime

• 5-7% are hard-core white collar criminals

• We are interested in the severity of the propensity of the 93-95% and definitely don’t want the 5-7% working for us!

Page 38: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 38

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?

THE SYNTONIC SYNDROME

Five key characteristics of the hard-core white collar criminal (5-7%)

• Ego-syntonic: “not my fault-ism”, where they re-arrange events to be continually interpreted in their favor, often at the expense of another person (vs. “ego-dystonic”)

• Personality disorders: the person probably has a psychological problem called a personality disorder

• High IQ: the person has a high IQ• Differential treatment: the person treats different people

differently within organization, usually based on who can give them what they want. Bottom line: people are carefully manipulated

• Controls decisions: the person seeks to control – or create – the (decision-making) process, especially in areas where they can personally benefit

Page 39: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 39

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

RED FLAGSBEHAVIOR FLAGS

• Financial difficulties• Living beyond means relative to known income level• Family problems• Serious addiction to drugs, alcohol, or gambling• An unwillingness to share duties or allow others to help• Defensive behavior-overly nervous when questioned• A refusal to take vacations or very short vacations• Over-devotion to the job-working a lot of overtime and

weekends-never calls in sick or misses work!• A close personal relationship with vendors or customers• Change in behavior• Rule breakers

Page 40: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 40

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

LIVING BEYOND MEANS #1!

Page 41: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 41

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

2012 REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

LIVING BEYOND MEANS FUELED BY ASSET MISAPPROPRIATION!

Page 42: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 42

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

FINANCIAL AND BUSINESS FLAGS

• Business is inexplicably unprofitable• Company is having cash flow problems• Under capitalized• Financial statements are always late• Financial statement trends/ratios are inconsistent and do not

make sense• Financial records and books are in disarray and always out of

balance• Management’s operating and financial decisions are dominated

by a single person or a few persons acting in concert• Background checks are not conducted on key employees• High turnover of management and/or key accounting personnel• Management displays a propensity to take undue risks

Page 43: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 43

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

FINANCIAL AND BUSINESS FLAGS (continued)

• Accounting personnel exhibit inexperience or laxity in performing their duties

• Numerous banks and accounts• Frequent change in independent auditors/accounting firm• Management places undue pressures on the auditors, through

fees and unreasonable deadlines• Frequent legal matters• Frequent change in legal counsel and multiple law firms• Operates on a “crisis” basis• Fire people quickly if they don’t do what they want• Significant transactions with related parties• Problems with governmental and regulatory agencies

Page 44: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 44

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

INTERNAL CONTROL FLAGS

• A single employee controls the company finances and accounting-lack of segregation of duties!

• Bank accounts are not timely reconciled and not reviewed by someone independent of preparer

• Invoices are paid without verifying receipt or purchase authorizations

• Reimbursements are not supported by receipts or other supporting documentation

• Excessive sales voids and credit memos• Missing deposit slips and/or cancelled checks• Unexplained inventory shortages or adjustments• Subsidiary account balances not reconciled• Unexplained and numerous end-of-period adjusting entries

Page 45: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 45

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

INTERNAL CONTROL FLAGS (continued)

• Missing documents• Altered documents• Photocopy of documents when originals should be available

Page 46: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 46

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTIVE VS. DETECTIVE CONTROLS

Page 47: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 47

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTIVE CONTROLS

Preventive controls attempt to deter or prevent undesirable events from occurring. They are proactive controls that help prevent a loss.

DETECTIVE CONTROLS

Detective controls, on the other hand, attempt to detect undesirable acts. The provide evidence that a loss has occurred but do not prevent a loss from occurring.

Detective techniques should be used to uncover fraud events when preventive measures fail or unmitigated risks are realized.

Page 48: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 48

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTIVE AND DETECTIVE CONTROLS IN ACTION

Page 49: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 49

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTIVE CONTROLS

• Segregations of duties with well defined job descriptions and policies and procedures

• Job rotation • Mandatory vacations• Obtaining pre-approval on transactions before processing• Require dual signatures on checks above a certain amount• Using document control numbers to account for all

transactions-checks, purchase orders, invoices etc…• Matching and comparing documents• Testing clerical accuracy• Physical controls over cash, checks, signatures, inventory and

other assets• Computer passwords and access controls to prevent

unauthorized electronic access

Page 50: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 50

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTIVE CONTROLS (CONTINUED)

• Back up financial files daily• Pre-employment background investigations• Employee training programs-fraud prevention• Prosecute the guilty

Page 51: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 51

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

DETECTIVE CONTROLS

• Whistleblower Policies and Hotlines (TIPS!!!)• Management and supervisory reviews and approvals• Reconciliations• Independent review of bank reconciliations and supporting

documents-cancelled checks• Independent review of vendor control file for suspicious

vendors• Independent review of payroll files for suspicious employees.• Investigate customer and vendor complaints promptly• Physical inspections/counts• Financial analysis, budget vs. actual• Data analysis, data mining and continuous auditing techniques• Other technology tools• Audits-external, internal, surprise

Page 52: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 52

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WHEN YOU UNCOVER FRAUD?

•BE AWARE OF WARNING SIGNS

•REPORT IRREGULARITIES, SPECIFICALLY:

– If someone you work with asks you to do something that is illegal or unethical

– If you suspect that someone— regardless of rank or position—is committing fraud or abuse

Page 53: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 53

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WHEN YOU UNCOVER FRAUD?

• Follow your organizations fraud policy

• Report through hotline or other anonymous reporting mechanism

• Anonymous letter to company official

• Share your concern with your immediate supervisor or organization’s audit committee

• Do not confront the suspected perpetrator

• Do not investigate the matter on your own

Page 54: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 54

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WHEN YOU UNCOVER FRAUD?

• Organization management should retain counsel-attorney/client privilege

• Employers have a duty to investigate promptly and thoroughly

• Counsel should retain a forensic expert to assist in the investigation

• Employee (suspect) may be suspended with or without pay-but do it swiftly if enough predication is present

• Employee (suspect) access to offices, computer systems, banking, communications and other access rights and privileges should be suspended or terminated

• Preserve evidence

• Understand legal implications

• Inform your insurance carriers

Page 55: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 55

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WHEN YOU UNCOVER FRAUD?

• Objectives of the investigation should be conducted with integrity, fairness, impartiality and respect and include:

– Gathering the facts

– Determining the merits of the complaint

– Complying with legal obligations

– Maintaining confidentiality

– Preserving the reputations of individuals and the organization

– Taking proper remedial action

– Avoiding liability

– Preventing future claims and incidences

Page 56: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 56

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WHEN YOU UNCOVER FRAUD?

• Everyone in an organization is responsible for fighting fraud.

• Be alert to potential fraud.

• Report any suspicions to your organization

Page 57: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 57

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD

THE FIVE MOST IMPORTANT TAKEAWAYS – AGAIN!

1. Trust is not an internal control!– Establish, to the extent possible, controls and procedures that eliminate the

element of trust

– Always segregate the custody of the asset with the recordkeeping for the asset

2. Set the tone from the top!– “If you are stealing, your employees are stealing!”

– E.g., office supplies, expense reports, etc.

3. Know your employees!– Background investigations and public records checks before hiring

– Meet and establish a baseline relationship

4. Institute a fraud policy– No tolerance

– Will prosecute

5. Establish a hotline for tips– Number one method for detecting fraud!

– Can outsource

Page 58: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 58

MY BOOK!

EXPECTED RELEASE THIS WINTER!

STAY TUNED!

Page 59: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 59

HOW CAN RAFFA ASSIST YOU IN PREVENTING AND DETECTING FRAUD?

A resource for the nonprofit community to help organizations effectively manage risk and better ensure the

prevention and detection of fraud.

Check us out at WWW.RAFFA.COM/FRAUD

Page 60: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 60

HOW CAN RAFFA ASSIST YOU IN PREVENTING AND DETECTING FRAUD?

FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS AND PREVENTION• Fraud examinations and internal investigations

• Fraud risk assessments

• Review of internal controls and management practices

• Financial statement misrepresentations

• Background and workplace investigations

• Computer forensic analysis, imaging, data mining and recovery

• Asset tracing and recovery

• Reconstruction of accounting records

• Continuous audit services

• Anti-fraud consulting and training

Page 61: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 61

SOME AREAS WE WILL BE GOING OVER IN OUR OTHER PRESENTATION

PART III: THE PREVENTION – DECEMBER 12, 2013, 12:00-2:00 P.M.

• Fraud risk assessments• Setting the tone at the top and your board of directors• What are the best preventative measures and controls?• The five critical takeaways!

Page 62: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 62

RESOURCES AND SUGGESTED READING

• 2012 Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, http://www.acfe.com/rttn.aspx

• “The American Fraud Report,” http://www.jpsimsconsulting.com

• The CPA’s Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime Prevention, AICPA

• Managing the Business Risk of Fraud: A Practical Guide; AICPA, ITA, and ACFE; https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/Public%20Documents/fraud%20paper.pdf

Page 63: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 63

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Page 64: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 64

BIOGRAPHY

• 35 years of consulting, audit, accounting and tax experience in the public and private sectors.

• Started career with a Big-Four international accounting firm in Washington, DC.

• Founded a regional certified public accounting and consulting firm in 1982 and grew it to on of the Washington, DC’s largest firms in seven years. Merged his practice with Raffa P.C. in 2008.

• Managed and conducted audit and accounting engagements ranging from small privately held to large publicly held businesses in various industries, including multi-national businesses, nonprofit organizations, and governmental entities and agencies.

• Performed economic and financial analysis, including projections and forecasts, in support of litigation and claims for lost earnings and profits, business interruption, shareholder disputes, patent and trademark infringements, bankruptcy and restructuring, and structural settlements; assistance with interrogatories, document requests and depositions; and serving as an expert and consulting witness.

• Performed and supervised business valuations for both public and closely held companies in a variety of industries, individuals and estates, family limited partnerships and limited liability companies, including valuations for business combinations (SFAS 141R), mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, estate and gift taxes, marital dissolution proceedings, buy-sell agreements, intangible assets and intellectual property, purchase price allocations, goodwill (SFAS 142) and long-lived asset (SFAS 144) impairment, fair value accounting (SFAS 157), cheap stock (IRC 409A), stock-based compensation (SFAS 123R), phantom stock and employee stock ownership plans.

• Conducted and led teams of forensic accountants on fraud audits and investigations, including fraudulent financial statements, misappropriations of assets and embezzlements; money laundering, kickbacks, bribery and conflicts of interest; insurance claims; bankruptcy; financial institutions and loan fraud. Also has conducted fraud risk assessments, anti-fraud programs, and fraud training and education.

LAWRENCE J. HOFFMAN, CPA/CFF, CVA, CFE

SENIOR PARTNERRAFFA, P.C.1899 L STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

TEL. 202-822-5408FAX [email protected]

Page 65: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 65

BIOGRAPHY

• Assisted companies and nonprofits with restructuring and turnaround situations, including recapitalizations, reorganizations and liquidations. Advised entities on Chapters 11 and 7, bankruptcy filings and proceedings and non-judicial workouts. Developed and administered crisis management plans, cash flows, liquidation and turnaround analysis, debt restructuring and creditor negotiations, and turnaround plans.

• Formulated strategic short- and long-term business and financial planning for various business organizations and served as interim “C” level positions, including for a major North American sports league, European and U.S. aircraft manufacturer, aviation charter airline and travel company, and a multi-chain quick service food chain.

• Formulated syndication strategies and prepared business plans and private placement offerings, including financial forecasts, market research and analysis, due diligence, securities pricing and structuring for various public and private securities offerings, including SEC filing.

• Founded and developed a regional NASD licensed broker dealer investment banking firm. Placed over $150 million in debt and equity and represented over $200 million in merger and acquisition transactions.

• Founded and developed two private equity funds in excess of $10 million, including investments in early stage and mature emerging companies in the form of debt and equity. Portfolio investments included aviation, food and hospitality, software and technology, telecommunications, sports and entertainment, banking and financial institutions, healthcare, and wholesale and retail.

• Co-founded and managed various real estate acquisition, ownership, and operating entities, including commercial office buildings, shopping centers, flex warehouses, residential housing and developed land.

• Performed tax and financial consulting services for individuals and closely held businesses.

• Instructor in audit, accounting, finance, and forensic accounting.

LAWRENCE J. HOFFMAN, CPA/CFF, CVA, CFE

SENIOR PARTNER

Page 66: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 66

BIOGRAPHY

LAWRENCE J. HOFFMAN, CPA/CFF, CVA, CFE

SENIOR PARTNER

EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS• Bachelor of Science, Accounting – Mount St. Mary’s University

• Certified Public Accountant (CPA)

• Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE)

• Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF)

• Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA)

• Private Investigator (PI), Virginia

• Series 7 General Securities Representative (not active)

• Series 24 General Securities Principal (not active)

• Series 63 Uniform Securities Agent (not active)

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS & AFFILIATIONS• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Member

• Virginia Society of Certified Public Accountants

• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

• National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts

• Institute of Business Appraisers

PERSONAL INTERESTS• Private pilot with instrument, multi-engine, high performance complex and aircraft ratings

• Golf and fishing

• Reading and politics

Page 67: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 67

BIOGRAPHY

• 9 years of fraud investigation and financial audit experience• Started career with U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Forensic Audits and

Special Investigations Unit• Led as many as 3 concurrent forensic audits and investigations on a variety of

topics, including: Federal contractor/grantee eligibility fraud and integrity issues; federal tax collection program integrity; abuse of government purchase cards, travel cards, and premium class travel privileges; employment of sex offenders and child abusers at schools and child care facilities; passport application fraud; manufacture and marketing of herbal dietary supplements

• Planned, developed, and completed audit and investigative objectives, scope, and methodology

• Designed innovative analytical strategies and investigative techniques to identify fraud indicators in complex datasets, using software packages such as IDEA and SAS

• Identified, investigated, and ultimately referred hundreds of cases of potential fraud, waste, and abuse to federal authorities for administrative action

• Led multiple undercover operations of varying complexity and political sensitivity• Drafted numerous congressional testimonies and publicly available audit reports

(see co-authorship experience below)• Designed and implemented internal quality assurance policies and procedures • Bachelor of Science, Accounting – University of Maryland, College Park• Bachelor of Science, Finance – University of Maryland, College Park• Designated as a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) by the Association of Certified

Fraud Examiners

Leslie C Kirsch, CFE

ManagerRAFFA, P.C.1899 L STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

TEL. 202-955-7204FAX [email protected]

Page 68: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 68

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

PRESSURE

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 69: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 69

FRAUD DETECTION TECHNIQUES

PREVENTATIVE CONTROLS

Page 70: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

Part II: The Detection * Page 70

THE FRAUD TRIANGLE

RATIONALIZATION

Part II: The Detection * Page

Page 71: 2013-11-19 Nonprofit Fraud Part 2

THANK YOU!

THANK YOU!

Lawrence J. Hoffman – Senior Partner Director of Forensic Accounting Services [email protected] 202-822-5408

Leslie C. Kirsch – Manager, Forensic Accounting [email protected] 202-955-7204

Part II: The Detection * Page 71