2012 C2 Rubric for Writing Task Evaluation
1
Hwa Chong Institution (College) C1 History Writing Task Rubrics HWA CHONG INSTITUTION (COLLEGE) HISTORY DEPARTMENT 0 - 2 3 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 8 9 - 10 Writing of this band will exhibit significant irrelevance, with significant incoherence. Content will be largely negligible and/or inaccurate. 0 – offered rarely, to students failing to make any attempt at writing anything of value. 1 – offered to students who recognize the point being discussed is value, and attempts to briefly comment on it. 2 – offered to students who attempt to write at length about the given factor, but fails to achieve anything of note. Writing here will be characterized by a lack of understanding of the point / factor / event / personality. While coherent, it will be evident that little coherent analysis has taken place. Content will often be brief, and treated superficially. Sweeping statements would have been made to cover that fact, and be passed off as analysis. Writing here will often be relevant, but narrative. The focus would be on the description of events, than the explanation of how events serve to demonstrate a point about the factor being discussed. Content will be relevant to the factor, event or personality, if not the question. Writing here will demonstrate an understanding of the requirements of the question, and offer a relevant analysis. The approach will be analytical, with sections of narrative / description. Content will often be accurate, and expressed coherently most of the time. Writing here will exhibit a mastery of the principles behind essay writing, and offer a fully relevant response. The quality of analysis is consistent, with little weakness or narration. Content will be accurate, and offered in a manner that shows control over the response. 10 marks will only be awarded to responses requiring no room for improvement.
-
Upload
audrey-jong -
Category
Documents
-
view
39 -
download
4
description
h2 history
Transcript of 2012 C2 Rubric for Writing Task Evaluation
Hwa Chong Institution (College)C1 History Writing Task Rubrics
H W A C H O N G I N S T I T U T I O N ( C O L L E G E )H I S T O R Y D E P A R T M E N T
0 - 2 3 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 8 9 - 10
Writing of this band willexhibit significantirrelevance, withsignificant incoherence.Content will be largelynegligible and/orinaccurate.
0 – offered rarely, tostudents failing to makeany attempt at writinganything of value.
1 – offered to studentswho recognize the pointbeing discussed is value,and attempts to brieflycomment on it.
2 – offered to studentswho attempt to write atlength about the givenfactor, but fails to achieveanything of note.
Writing here will becharacterized by a lack ofunderstanding of the point/ factor / event /personality. Whilecoherent, it will be evidentthat little coherentanalysis has taken place.
Content will often be brief,and treated superficially.Sweeping statementswould have been made tocover that fact, and bepassed off as analysis.
Writing here will often berelevant, but narrative.The focus would be on thedescription of events, thanthe explanation of howevents serve todemonstrate a point aboutthe factor being discussed.
Content will be relevant tothe factor, event orpersonality, if not thequestion.
Writing here willdemonstrate anunderstanding of therequirements of thequestion, and offer arelevant analysis. Theapproach will be analytical,with sections of narrative /description.
Content will often beaccurate, and expressedcoherently most of thetime.
Writing here will exhibit amastery of the principlesbehind essay writing, andoffer a fully relevantresponse. The quality ofanalysis is consistent, withlittle weakness ornarration.
Content will be accurate,and offered in a mannerthat shows control overthe response.
10 marks will only beawarded to responsesrequiring no room forimprovement.
