2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County...
-
Upload
antony-beasley -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County...
2011 Achievement GapsBy Various Subgroups:Reading and Math EOG
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools
Board of EducationOctober 11, 2011
Introduction
• The following charts compare the EOG performance in reading and math by gender and other subgroup classifications for African-American, Hispanic and White students– Due to the small number of students for American Indian, Asian
and Multiracial subgroups, results are variable and demonstrate inconsistent patterns
• Charts include the 5 Urban Districts when data are available
MATH
Historical Math GapsWS/FCS:
Math EOG Grades 3-8
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Pro
fic
ien
cy
Black Hispanic White
* In 2006, the rigor was raised on the Math EOGs grades 3-8.
** Beginning in 2009, the higher of the original and retest scores were used.
2011 Math 3-8 Proficiency by Group and Urban District
Grade White African-American Hispanic
WSFCS 92.9 72.3 (-21) 75.6 (-17)
DURHAM 90.0 64.3 (-26) 71.1 (-19)
GUILFORD 93.0 73.4 (-20) 80.4 (-13)
CHARLOTTE >95 72.6 (-22+) 79.3 (-16+)
WAKE >95 70.1 (-25+) 78.7 (-16+)
LEP URBAN COMPARISONS
15.8%
13.1%
8.4%10.2%
7.5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CHARLOTTE WAKE
63.6 67.4 67.8 69.8 66.373.1
85.6 84.4 84.1 88.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CHARLOTTE WAKE
Percent of Math 3-8 Tested Population that is LEP
2011 Math 3-8 LEP vs.Not LEP
2011 EOG MATH 3-8:By Gender &
Ethnicity
70.676.9 81.4 79.8 78.6
71.7 74.4 79.5 78.9 78.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
HISPANIC FEMALES HISPANIC MALES
66.573.7 76.3 75.0 71.9
62.071.0 70.5 70.3 68.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALES AFRICAN-AMERICAN MALES
90.6 93.9 93.289.5 91.9 92.8 95.0>95>95 >95
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
WHITE FEMALES WHITE MALES
4.54.5 2.72.7 5.85.8 4.74.7 3.63.6
1.11.1 2.02.0 0.40.4 ---- -----1.1-1.1 2.52.5 1.91.9 0.90.9 -0.2
-0.2
2010 vs. 2011 Math EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:
African-American
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
AFR. AMERICAN
IN F
AV
OR
OF
:
MA
LE
S
FE
MA
LE
S
WSFCS 10 WSFCS 11
DURHAM 10 DURHAM 11
GUILFORD 10 GUILFORD 11
CMS 10 CMS 11
WAKE 10 WAKE 11
2010 vs. 2011 Math EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:
Hispanic
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
HISPANIC
IN F
AV
OR
OF
:
MA
LE
S
FE
MA
LE
S
WSFCS 10 WSFCS 11
DURHAM 10 DURHAM 11
GUILFORD 10 GUILFORD 11
CMS 10 CMS 11
WAKE 10 WAKE 11
2010 & 2011 EOG Math:
WSFCS Gender Gaps by Ethnicity &
Grade
HISPANIC GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: MATH
-1.7 -1.5
3.0
6.1
-1.4
4.1
-2.4 -1.9
1.5
4.1
12.6
3.9
-3.0
-1.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF:
MA
LES
FE
MA
LES
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
AFRICAN-AMERICAN GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: MATH
2.7 3.2
-1.6
5.9
8.2 8.7
1.1
-1.7
1.8
-0.8
9.0
6.6
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF:
MA
LES
FE
MA
LES
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
WHITE GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: MATH
1.6
-0.6
2.0
4.8
1.30.0 1.2
3.1 2.71.4
4.2
0.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF:
MA
LES
FE
MA
LES
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
2011 Math EOG 3-8: Lunch Eligibility By Ethnicity
PAID LUNCH FREE-REDUCED LUNCH
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 1499 (23%) 85.9% 5154 (77%) 68.4%
HISPANIC 424 (9%) 86.8% 4408 (91%) 74.1%
WHITE 7986 (77%) 95.8% 2449 (23%) 83.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID LUNCH FREE-REDUCED LUNCH
Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population
Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population
2011 Math EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender
MALE FEMALE
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 2624 66.9% 2530 69.9%
HISPANIC 2246 72.8% 2162 75.5%
WHITE 1260 81.8% 1189 85.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
FRL - MALE FRL - FEMALE
2011 Math EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender
MALE FEMALE
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 804 84.5% 695 87.6%
HISPANIC 215 87.0% 209 86.6%
WHITE 4079 95.1% 3907 96.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID - MALE PAID - FEMALE
2011 Math EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status
FRL NOT LEP FRL LEP
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 5143 68.3% 11 --
HISPANIC 1654 88.2% 2754 65.6%
WHITE 2412 83.6% 37 --
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
FRL-NOT LEP FRL-LEP
2011 Math EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID-NOT LEP PAID-LEP
PAID NOT LEP PAID LEP
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 1491 86.0% 8 --
HISPANIC 329 91.8% 95 69.5%
WHITE 7954 95.8% 32 --
READING
Historical Reading Gaps
WS/FCS:Reading EOG Grades 3-8
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Pro
fic
ien
cy
Black Hispanic White
* In 2008, the rigor was raised on the Reading EOGs grades 3-8.
** Beginning in 2009, the higher of the original and retest scores were used.
2011 Reading 3-8 Proficiency by Group and Urban District
Grade White African-American Hispanic
WSFCS 86.3 54.5 (-32) 49.6 (-37)
DURHAM 85.1 49.8 (-35) 47.2 (-38)
GUILFORD 86.5 56.6 (-30) 59.6 (-27)
CHARLOTTE 90.7 59.0 (-32) 60.2 (-31)
WAKE 90.7 57.8 (-33) 60.2 (-31)
LEP URBAN COMPARISONS
15.7%
13.0%
8.3%10.1%
7.4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CHARLOTTE WAKE
34.3 32.8 36.5 39.0 37.0
61.4
74.4 73.0 74.881.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CHARLOTTE WAKE
Percent of Reading 3-8 Tested Population that is LEP
2011 Reading 3-8 LEP vs.Not LEP
2011 EOG READING
3-8:By Gender &
Ethnicity
48.4 53.262.3 62.7 61.8
45.9 46.157.0 57.7 58.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
HISPANIC FEMALES HISPANIC MALES
54.2 58.1 60.6 63.9 61.0
45.3 51.1 52.4 54.1 54.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALES AFRICAN-AMERICAN MALES
86.6 88.5 87.2 92.0 92.183.8 84.2 85.8 89.5 89.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DURHAM WSFCS GUILFORD CMS WAKE
WHITE FEMALES WHITE MALES
8.98.9 7.07.0 8.28.2 9.89.8 6.66.6
2.82.8 4.34.3 1.41.4 2.52.5 2.72.72.52.5 7.17.1 5.35.3 5.05.0 3.33.3
2010 vs. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:
African-American
\
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
AFR. AMERICAN
IN F
AV
OR
OF
:
MA
LE
S
FE
MA
LE
S
WSFCS 10 WSFCS 11
DURHAM 10 DURHAM 11
GUILFORD 10 GUILFORD 11
CMS 10 CMS 11
WAKE 10 WAKE 11
2010 vs. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:
Hispanic
\
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
HISPANIC
IN F
AV
OR
OF
:
MA
LE
S
FE
MA
LE
S
WSFCS 10 WSFCS 11
DURHAM 10 DURHAM 11
GUILFORD 10 GUILFORD 11
CMS 10 CMS 11
WAKE 10 WAKE 11
2010 & 2011 EOG
Reading: WSFCS Gender Gaps by Ethnicity
& Grade
HISPANIC GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: READING
9.78.7
5.8
8.1
5.0
6.4
4.3
10.7
9.3
5.1
9.5
2.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF
FEM
ALE
S
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
AFRICAN-AMERICAN GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: READING
5.85.0
5.9
9.110.6
7.1
4.0
7.7
2.9
6.1
12.2
8.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF
FEM
ALE
S
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
WHITE GAPS BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALESBY GRADE: READING
2.3
4.6
1.9
4.1 4.53.33.5
2.5
5.44.8
6.2
2.7
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
03 04 05 06 07 08
IN F
AV
OR
OF
FEM
ALE
S
GAP 2010 GAP 2011
2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Lunch Eligibility By Ethnicity
PAID LUNCH FREE-REDUCED LUNCH
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 1498 (23%) 73.2% 5145 (77%) 49.1%
HISPANIC 418 (9%) 79.4% 4363 (91%) 46.7%
WHITE 7974 (77%) 90.6% 2433 (23%) 72.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID LUNCH FREE-REDUCED LUNCH
Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population
Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population
2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity
and Gender
MALE FEMALE
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 2615 45.4% 2530 52.8%
HISPANIC 2221 43.0% 2142 50.6%
WHITE 1250 68.6% 1183 76.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
FRL - MALE FRL - FEMALE
2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender
MALE FEMALE
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 802 69.7% 696 77.2%
HISPANIC 211 78.2% 207 80.7%
WHITE 4073 89.0% 3901 92.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID - MALE PAID - FEMALE
2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity
and LEP Status
FRL NOT LEP FRL LEP
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 5135 49.1% 10 --
HISPANIC 1658 72.7% 2705 30.8%
WHITE 2399 72.5% 34 --
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
FRL-NOT LEP FRL-LEP
2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
PAID-NOT LEP PAID-LEP
PAID NOT LEP PAID LEP
N % PROF N % PROF
AFRICAN-AMERICAN 1490 73.2% 8 --
HISPANIC 329 87.5% 89 49.4%
WHITE 7942 90.7% 32 --
Summary
• Gender Gaps are larger in the middle grades
• Gender Gaps are larger for the African-American and Hispanic subgroup as a whole and increasingly in middle grades for African-American students
• Economic differences account for about 1/3 – 1/2 of the gap for African-American students
• English proficiency and economic differences account for virtually all of the gap for Hispanic students