2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

download 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

of 61

Transcript of 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    1/61

    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

    With Wisdom We Explore

    www.uthm.edu.my

    By:

    Masni A. [email protected]

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    2/61

    The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish thedistribution of internal forces and moments over the wholepart of a structure and to identify the critical designconditions at all sections.The type of analysis should be appropriate to the problembeing considered. The following may be used: linear elasticanalysis, linear elastic analysis with limited redistribution, andplastic analysis.

    Linear elastic analysis may be carried out assuming crosssections are uncracked (i.e. concrete section properties), usinglinear stress-strain relationships, and assuming means valuesof elastic modulus.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Introductionwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    3/61

    Actions that applied on a beam may consist of beams self-weight , permanent and variable actions from slabs, actionsfrom secondary beams and other structural or non-structuralmembers supported by the beam.The distribution of slab actions on beams depends on the slabdimension, supporting system and boundary condition .Beam supporting slabs designed as spanning one-way can beconsidered to be uniformly load as shown in figure below.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    4/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

    l x

    l y

    A B

    C D

    l y

    w = 0.5.n.l x kN/m

    Beam AC and BD

    l x

    w = 0 kN/m

    Beam AB and CD

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    5/61

    For beam supporting a two-way slab panel freely supported alongfour edge.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

    l x

    l y

    AB

    C D

    l y

    mkN l l nl

    w y

    x x / 36

    2

    Beam AC and BD

    l x

    mk N nl

    w x / 3

    Beam AB and CD

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    6/61

    There are alternatives methods which consider various supportconditions and slab continuity. The methods are, (i). Slab shearcoefficient from Table 3.15 BS 8110 , (ii). Yield line analysis and (iii).Table 63 Reinforced Concrete Designers Handbook by Reynold.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    7/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

    l x

    l y

    A B

    C D

    l y

    w = vx.n.l x kN/m

    Beam AC

    l x

    Beam CD

    w = vy.n.l x kN/m

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    8/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my

    3000 4500

    2 5 0 0

    4 0 0 0

    1 2 3

    A

    B

    C

    200 x 500

    200 x 500 200 x 500

    200 x 500 200 x 500

    2 0 0

    x 5

    0 0

    2 0 0

    x

    5 0 0

    2 0 0

    x 5

    0 0

    2 0 0

    x

    5 0 0

    FS1 (150 thk.)

    FS2 (150 thk.) FS3 (150 thk.)

    Determine the characteristic permanent and

    variable action act on beam B/1-3.

    Weight of concrete = 25 kN/m 3

    Finishes, ceiling = 2.0 kN/m 2 and services

    Variable action = 3.0 kN/m 2 (All slab)

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    9/61

    Action on slabSelfweight = 0.15 x 25 = 3.75 kN/m 2

    Finishes, ceiling and services = 2.0 kN/m 2

    Chac. Permanent action, G k = 5.75 kN/m2

    Chac. Variable action, Q k = 3.0 kN/m 2

    Distribution of actions from slabs are as follows;FS1 : l y /l x = 7.5 / 2.5 = 3 > 2.0, One-way slabFS2 : l y /l x = 4.0 / 3.0 = 1.33 < 2.0, Two-way slabFS3 : l y /l x = 4.5 / 4.0 = 1.13 < 2.0, Two-way slab

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    10/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my

    3000 4500

    2 5 0 0

    4 0 0 0

    1 2 3

    A

    B

    C

    w1 = 0.5.n.l x

    w2 = vy.n.l x w3 = vx.n.l x

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    11/61

    Action from slabw1 Gk = 0.5 x 5.75 x 2.5 = 7.19 kN/mw1 Qk = 0.5 x 3.00 x 2.5 = 3.75 kN/m

    From Table 3.15: BS 8110: Part 1: 1997

    w2 Gk = 0.4 x 5.75 x 3.0 = 6.90 kN/mw2 Qk = 0.4 x 3.00 x 3.0 = 3.60 kN/m

    w3 Gk = 0.44 x 5.75 x 4.0 = 10.12 kN/mw3 Qk = 0.44 x 3.00 x 4.0 = 5.28 kN/m

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    12/61

    Actions on beamBeam selfweight = 0.20 x (0.5 0.15) x 25 = 1.75 kN/m

    Span 1-2Permanent action,G k = 7.19 + 6.90 + 1.75 = 15.84 kN/mVariable action, Q k = 3.75 + 3.60 = 7.35 kN/m

    Span 2-3Permanent action, G k = 7.19 + 10.12 + 1.75 = 19.06 kN/mVariable action, Q k = 3.75 + 5.28 = 9.03 kN/m

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my

    3000 4500

    Gk = 15.84 kN/mQk = 7.35 kN/m

    G k = 19.06 kN/mQ k = 9.03 kN/m

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    13/61

    Combination of action is specifically used for the definition of themagnitude of actions to be used when a limit state is under theinfluence of different actions.For continuous beam , Load cases is concerned with the

    arrangement of the variable actions to give the most unfavourable conditions.If there is only one variable actions (e.g. Imposed load) in acombination, the magnitude of the actions can be obtained bymultiplying them by the appropriate factors.

    If there is more than one variable actions in combination, it isnecessary to identify the leading action( Qk,1) and otheraccompanying actions (Qk,i). The accompanying actions is alwaystaken as the combination value.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Combination of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    14/61

    Design values of actions, ultimate limit state-persistent andtransient design situations

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Combination of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    15/61

    /

    In considering the combinations of actions, the relevant casesshall be considered to enable the critical design conditions tobe established at all sections, within the structure or part ofthe structure considered.For simply supported beam , the analysis for bending andshear force can be carried out using statically determinateapproach. For the ultimate limit state we need only considerthe maximum load of 1.35G k + 1.5Q k on the span.While for continuous beam a simplification in the number ofload arrangements for use in a Country is required, referenceis made to its National Annex . The following simplified loadarrangements are recommended for buildings:

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my Clause 5.1.3 : MS EN 1992-1-1

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    16/61

    Load set 1: Alternate or adjacent spans loaded (ContinuousBeam)Alternate span carrying the design permanent and variable

    load (1.35 Gk + 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design permanent loads (1.35Gk)

    Any two adjacent spans carrying the design permanent and

    variable loads (1.35 Gk + 1.5Qk), all other spans carrying onlythe design permanent load (1.35Gk)

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my Section 5.1.3 : MS EN 1992-1-1

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    17/61

    Alternate spans loaded

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    18/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    19/61

    Load set 2: All or alternate spans loaded (Continuous Beam)All span carrying the design permanent and variable loads(1.35 Gk+ 1.5Qk)

    Alternate span carrying the design permanent and variableload (1.35 Gk+ 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design

    permanent loads (1.35Gk)

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my UK National Annex & Malaysia National Annex

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    20/61

    All span loaded

    Alternate span loaded

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk

    1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk 1.35Gk

    1.35Gk1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk

    1.35Gk

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    21/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    22/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    23/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my

    Load Case 3

    SFD

    BMD

    SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM ENVELOPE

    BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM ENVELOPE

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    24/61

    Three analysis methods may be used in order to obtain shearforce and bending moment for design purposes. There are;

    Elastic analysis using moment distribution method

    (Modified Stiffness Method)Simplified method using shear and moment coefficientfrom Table 3.6: BS 8110: Part 1.Using commercial analysis software such as Staad Pro,

    Esteem, Ansys, Lusas, etc.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Method of Structural Analysiswww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    25/61

    Moment distribution method is only involving distributionmoments to joint repetitively.The accuracy of moment distribution method is dependent to

    the number repeat which does and usually more than 5repeat real enough. Right value will be acquired when nomore moments that need distributed.In general the value is dependent to several factor as :

    Fixed end moment Carry over factor Member Stiffness Factor (distribution factor)

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    26/61

    Fixed end moment (FEM)The moment at the fixed joints of a loaded member are calledfixed-end moment.

    This moment can be determined from table below, dependingupon the type of loading on the member.

    Carry over factor (CO)

    The carry-over factor to a fixed end is always 0.5, otherwise itis 0.0.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    27/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my Fixed End Moment

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    28/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    29/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    30/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    31/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    32/61

    A series of 250 x 400 mm reinforced concrete beams spaced at 3 mcentres and spanning 7.5 m support a 175 mm thick reinforced concreteslab as shown in Figure 2.1. If the variable floor action is 3 kN/m 2 and theload induced by the weight of concrete is 25 kN/m 3, calculate the

    maximum shear force and bending moment of beam B/1-2.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Example 2.2www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    33/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    34/61

    Figure below shows the first floor layout plan of commercialbuilding. If all beams size are 300 x 500 mm, determine thefollowing;

    1. Characteristic permanent and variable action act on the beam 2/A-Eif all slab thickness are 150 mm and the brickwall heights is 3m.

    2. Shear force and bending moment envelope of beam 2/A-E.

    Given the following data;Variable load on slab = 4.0 kN/m 2

    Finishes, ceiling & services = 1.5 kN/m 2

    Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m 3

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    35/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    36/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    37/61

    2) Shear force and bending moment envelope of beam 2/A-E.Loading

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    38/61

    Moment of Inertia, II = bh 3/12 = 300 x 500 3/12 = 3.125 x 10 9 mm4

    Stiffness, KA-B K AB = K BA= 3I/L = 3 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.17 x 10 6 mm3

    B-C K BC = K CB = 4I/L = 4 x 3.125 x 109/8000 = 1.56 x 10

    6 mm

    3

    C-D K CD = K DC = 4I/L = 4 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.56 x 10 6 mm3

    D-E K DE = K ED= 3I/L = 3 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.17 x 10 6 mm3

    Distribution Factor, DFJoint A & E ~ DF AB & DF ED = K AB / (K AB + 0) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 0) = 1.0

    Joint B ~ DF BA = K BA / (K BA + K BC) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.43DF BC = K BC / (K BA + K BC) = 1.56 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.57

    Joint C ~ DF CB = K CB / (K CB + K CD) = 1.56 / (1.56 + 1.56) = 0.50DF CD = K CD / (K CB + K CD) = 1.56 / (1.56 + 1.56) = 0.50

    Joint D ~ DF DC = K DC / (K DC + K DE) = 1.56 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.57DF DE = K DE / (K DC + K DE) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.43

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    39/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

    Fix End Moment, FEM

    - M AB = M BA = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    - M BC = M CB = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    - M CD = M DC = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    - M DE = M ED = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    Load Case 1

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    40/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    41/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    42/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    43/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

    Fix End Moment, FEM

    - M AB = M BA = wL 2 /12= 24.72 x 82 /12= 131.84 kNm

    - M BC = M CB = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    - M CD = M DC = wL 2 /12= 24.72 x 82 /12= 131.84 kNm

    - M DE = M ED = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm

    Load Case 3

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    44/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    45/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my

    SFD Envelope

    BMD Envelope

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    46/61

    The analysis using moment distribution method is timeconsuming and is more conveniently carried out usingstandard computer technique.

    Therefore, as a simplification BS 8110 cl. 3.4.3 can be use.Table 3.5 are given in BS 8110 which enable a conservativeestimate of shear force and bending moment values to bedetermined for the design of continuous beam.

    There are conditions which must be satisfied in each casebefore these tables can be used. They are:

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    47/61

    The beams should be approximately equal span. The characteristic variable action Qk may not exceed the characteristic

    permanent action Gk. Load should be substantially uniformly distributed over three or more

    spans. Variation in span length should not exceed 15% of the longest span.

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

    (1.35Gk + 1.5Qk)

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    48/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my

    -0.11FL

    0.09FL

    -0.08FL -0.08FL

    0.07FL

    0.45F

    0.60F

    0.55F

    0.55F

    End Span Interior Span

    BendingMoments

    ShearingForces

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    49/61

    By using simplified method, analyze the beams shown below.

    F = 1.35G k + 1.5Q k = 1.35(18.31) + 1.5(6.00) = 33.72 kN/m x 8 m = 269.75 kN

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Example 2.4www.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    50/61

    Shear force and bending moment diagrams

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.4www.uthm.edu.my

    0.45F =121.39 kN

    0.60F =161.85 kN

    0.55F =148.36 kN 0.55F =148.36 kN

    0.55F =148.36 kN 0.55F =148.36 kN

    0.60F =161.85 kN

    0.45F =121.39 kN

    0.09FL =194.22 kNm

    0.11FL =2 37.38 kNm 0.08FL =172.64kNm 0.11FL =237.38 kNm

    0.07FL =151.06 kNm 0.07FL =151.06 kNm 0.09FL =194.22 kNm

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    51/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    52/61

    EC2: Section 5.5 permit the moment redistribution with thefollowing requirement;

    The resulting distribution remains in equilibrium with the load.The continuous beam are predominantly subject to flexural.

    The ratio of adjacent span should be in the range of 0.5 to 2

    There are other restrictions on the amount of momentredistribution in order to ensure ductility of the beam such as gradeof reinforcing steel and area of tensile reinforcement and hence the

    depth of neutral axis.Class A reinforcement; redistribution should 20%Class B and C reinforcement; redistribution should 30%

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Moment Redistributionwww.uthm.edu.my

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    53/61

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    54/61

    Load Case 1

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    V A

    VB1

    MB = 0VA(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 894.07 / 8 = 111.76 kN

    Fy = 0111.76 + V B1 33.72(8) = 0VB1 = 158.0 kN

    MC = 0VB2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 1140.8 / 8 = 142.60 kN

    Fy = 0142.60 + V C1 33.72(8) = 0VC1 = 127.16 kN

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    123.21 kNm

    VC1VB2

    184.97 kNm

    Span A - B

    Span B - C

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    55/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    VC2

    VD1

    MD = 0VC2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 +184.97 = 0VC2 = 1017.28 / 8 = 127.16 kN

    Fy = 0127.16 + V D1 33.72(8) = 0VD1 = 142.60 kN

    ME = 0

    VD2(8)

    33.72(8)2

    /2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 1264.01 / 8 = 158.0 kN

    Fy = 0158.0 + V E 33.72(8) = 0VE = 111.76 kN

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    VEVD2

    184.97 kNm

    123.21 kNmSpan C - D

    Span D - E

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    56/61

    Load Case 2

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    V A

    VB1

    MB = 0VA(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 894.07 / 8 = 111.76 kN

    Fy = 0111.76 + V B1 33.72(8) = 0VB1 = 158.0 kN

    MC = 0VB2(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 852.8 / 8 = 106.60 kN

    Fy = 0106.60 + V C1 24.72(8) = 0VC1 = 91.16 kN

    24.72 kN/m

    8 m

    123.21 kNm

    VC1VB2

    184.97 kNm

    Span A - B

    Span B - C

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    57/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    VC2

    VD1

    MD = 0VC2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 +184.97 = 0VC2 = 1017.28 / 8 = 127.16 kN

    Fy = 0127.16 + V D1 33.72(8) = 0VD1 = 142.60 kN

    ME = 0

    VD2(8)

    24.72(8)2

    /2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 976.01 / 8 = 122.0 kN

    Fy = 0122.0 + V E 24.72(8) = 0VE = 75.76 kN

    24.72 kN/m

    8 m

    VEVD2

    184.97 kNm

    123.21 kNmSpan C - D

    Span D - E

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    58/61

    Load Case 3

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    24.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    V A

    VB1

    MB = 0VA(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 606.07 / 8 = 75.76 kN

    Fy = 075.76 + V B1 24.72(8) = 0VB1 = 122.0 kN

    MC = 0VB2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 1140.8 / 8 = 142.60 kN

    Fy = 0142.60 + V C1 33.72(8) = 0VC1 = 127.16 kN

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    123.21 kNm

    VC1VB2

    184.97 kNm

    Span A - B

    Span B - C

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    59/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    24.72 kN/m

    8 m

    184.97 kNm

    VC2

    VD1

    MD = 0VC2(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 + 184.97 = 0VC2 = 729.28 / 8 = 91.16 kN

    Fy = 091.16 + V D1 24.72(8) = 0VD1 = 106.60 kN

    ME = 0

    VD2(8)

    33.72(8)2

    /2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 1264.01 / 8 = 158.0 kN

    Fy = 0158.0 + V E 33.72(8) = 0VE = 111.76 kN

    33.72 kN/m

    8 m

    VEVD2

    184.97 kNm

    123.21 kNmSpan C - D

    Span D - E

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    60/61

    With Wisdom We Explore

    Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my

    SFD EnvelopeAfter 20%Redistribution

    BMD EnvelopeAfter 20%Redistribution

  • 8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis

    61/61

    www.uthm.edu.my