15th Annual Cardiovascular & Medicine Symposium St. Augustine, Florida – May 15, 2014
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of 15th Annual Cardiovascular & Medicine Symposium St. Augustine, Florida – May 15, 2014

15th Annual Cardiovascular& Medicine Symposium
St. Augustine, Florida – May 15, 2014 Rick M. Reznicsek, EsquireRezLegal, LLC4230 Pablo Professional Court, Suite 200Jacksonville, Florida 32224Telephone: (904) 567-1179Facsimile: (904) 567-1066Email: [email protected]

Physician Compensationin Private Practice
vs.Hospital Employment
The Impact of the Federal Stark Lawand
Florida Law

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
STARK LAW
A Physician having an ownership interest in, or financial relationship with an entity may not make a referral to the entity for furnishing Designated Health Services reimbursable by Medicare of Medicaid.

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Penalties: Denial of payment $15,000 per service Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid $100,000 for entering into a “circumvention scheme” Violation of False Claims Act
Treble damages

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Ownership: Stock, units, percentage interest, etc. Secured debt
Unsecured debt is considered compensation

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Financial Arrangement: Employment Independent contractor Anything of value (tickets, meals)
$300 non-cash exception
Referral: Request, ordering, certification for the establishment
of a plan of care, including the request for a consult and the tests or procedures derived from that consult

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
DHS: Clinical lab Physical therapy Radiology (including MRI, CT, ultrasound) DME Home health Prosthetics, orthotics Outpatient prescription drugs Inpatient and outpatient hospital services Radiation therapy

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Florida Law: Covers DHS plus any other health care item or service Not limited to Medicare/Medicaid
Stark Exceptions: Ownership and compensation exceptions
Physician services (personally performed) In-Office ancillary Nuclear medicine Cardiac catheterization Lithotripsy

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Ownership exceptions Publicly traded securities
Compensation Exceptions Office space lease Equipment lease Employees Personal service arrangements Physician recruitment Fair Market Value compensation Non-monetary gifts/compensation up to $300

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Halifax Hospital Case – November 2013: 6 employed physicians – medical oncologists
[employed through hospital subsidiary] Base compensation plus bonus Bonus is a pool shared by the 6 physicians
Pool is 15% of the profit for the Medical Oncology Program
• Medical Oncology Program consists of professional fees (from physician services) plus outpatient oncology pharmacy charges plus outpatient services not performed by the physicians

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Halifax Hospital Case – November 2013 (cont’d): Court
The physicians participated in the profits generated from their referrals for prescriptions and work performed by others
The employment exception to the Stark Law prohibits compensation based on the volume or value of referrals
The incentive bonus was not based solely on “services personally performed”
This arrangement violates the Stark Law

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Tuomey Hospital Case – May 8, 2013: Jury verdict
21,000 improper claims totaling $39 million Per US Government, minimum recovery is $237
million (max of $357 million) CEO, VP and law firm have all resigned Settlement discussions ongoing

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Tuomey Hospital Case – May 8, 2013 (cont’d): Gastroenterology physicians considering performing
outpatient surgical procedures in their offices and not at Hospital
Other specialists said “us too” Hospital signed contracts with 19 doctors
Required physicians to provide outpatient procedures exclusively at hospital (or hospital ASC)
The 19 physicians were part-time employees of hospital only when they performed outpatient procedures at the hospital

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Tuomey Hospital Case – May 8, 2013 (cont’d): Compensation to physicians: base salary plus bonus
Bonus = 80% of collections, from both professional fees and facility fee (technical component)
Jury determined this arrangement violated Stark; did not meet employment exception Payment of a portion of the facility fee to doctor is
inappropriate

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Net result of Tuomey and Halifax: Employed physicians of a hospital system cannot
share in any DHS ancillary revenues What if the ancillary revenues were generated
within the physician offices (ultrasound)? Can the in-office ancillary exception be applied to
physicians employed by a hospital-owned subsidiary?
Language from the Halifax court indicates not (bonuses were not based solely on “services personally performed”)

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Net result of Tuomey and Halifax (cont’d): Does this reasoning extend to non-hospital
employees? Private equity Publicly traded (Sheridan, Mednax)

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Private Practice - Physician owned In-office ancillary services exception Applies to group practice Physicians in the group practice can share in the profit
generated by DHS

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Private Practice - Physician owned (cont’d) Acceptable distribution methods:
Even split Split based on ownership % (based on investment) Number of hours worked Seniority Generation of non-DHS revenue or RVUs Other methods not directly related to the volume
or value of the physician’s referrals for DHS

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Private Practice - Physician owned (cont’d) Not acceptable distribution methods:
Based on number of patients sent for DHS Based on revenue of DHS referred Any method that considers the volume or value of
DHS referrals

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Profits from non-DHS have no restrictions under Stark
But… State Laws have impact. Florida Anti-Fee Splitting Law
It is impermissible to pay or receive any commission, bonus, kickback or rebate, or engage in any split fee arrangement, either directly or indirectly, for patients referred to providers of health care goods and services

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Crow case Physician sold his practice to an HMO Physician employed by the HMO Physician owns no interest in the HMO Physician compensation based on total revenues
generated by physician for the HMO Including laboratory, radiology, diagnostic testing
Court Bonuses may not be paid for patient referrals.
Therefore it is inappropriate to pay employed physician a bonus based on ancillary revenues generated by the physician.

The Impact of the Federal Stark Law & Florida Law
Bottom line Sharing in ancillary revenues
Hospital Employee Private Practice
• No sharing DHS • Owners can share in DHS and non-DHS