FIGURE 14.1 The Hutt adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt fi gures. (Hutt, 1977. Reproduced by permission) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 101Lezak-Figures.indd 101 3/15/2012 4:59:41 PM3/15/2012 4:59:41 PM

FIGURE 14.2 Rey Complex Figure (actual size). (Osterrieth, 1944) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 102Lezak-Figures.indd 102 3/15/2012 4:59:43 PM3/15/2012 4:59:43 PM

FIGURE 14.3 Taylor Complex Figure (actual size). From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 103Lezak-Figures.indd 103 3/15/2012 4:59:46 PM3/15/2012 4:59:46 PM

FIGURE 14.4 Modifi ed Taylor Figure. (Hubley and Tremblay, 2002. © Anita Hubley. Reproduced by per-mission. This fi gure may be reproduced but may not be sold.) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 104Lezak-Figures.indd 104 3/15/2012 4:59:48 PM3/15/2012 4:59:48 PM

FIGURE 14.5 The four Medical College of Georgia (MCG) Complex Figures (actual size). (© 1988, 1989, 1990 K.J. Meador, Taylor, and Loring. Reproduced by permission.) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

(continued)

Lezak-Figures.indd 105Lezak-Figures.indd 105 3/15/2012 4:59:50 PM3/15/2012 4:59:50 PM

FIGURE 14.5 (Continued)

Lezak-Figures.indd 106Lezak-Figures.indd 106 3/15/2012 4:59:51 PM3/15/2012 4:59:51 PM

FIGURE 14.6 An example of a Complex Figure Test Rey-Osterrieth copy which would be diffi cult to doc-ument on a “registration” sheet due to fragmentation, broken confi guration, and the several repetitions. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 107Lezak-Figures.indd 107 3/15/2012 4:59:51 PM3/15/2012 4:59:51 PM

FIGURE 14.7 Structural elements of the Rey Complex Figure. (Binder, 1982) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 108Lezak-Figures.indd 108 3/15/2012 4:59:53 PM3/15/2012 4:59:53 PM

FIGURE 14.8 Sample freehand drawings for copying. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 109Lezak-Figures.indd 109 3/15/2012 4:59:55 PM3/15/2012 4:59:55 PM

Clock Drawing test performances(a) (b)

FIGURE 14.9 (a) Freehand drawing of a clock by a 54-year-old man with a history of anoxia resulting in bilateral hippocampus damage. This man was formerly employed as a design engineer for an international farm equipment manufacturer. (The clock hands were to be set at “20 minutes to 4.”). (b) Freehand drawing of a clock by a 66-year-old farmer with history of right middle cerebral artery stroke resulting in a lesion to fronto-temporo-parietal cortices. (The clock hands were to be set at “10 minutes after 11.”) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 110Lezak-Figures.indd 110 3/15/2012 4:59:56 PM3/15/2012 4:59:56 PM

FIGURE 14.10 Block Design test. (Reproduced by permission of The Psychological Corporation) From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 111Lezak-Figures.indd 111 3/15/2012 4:59:57 PM3/15/2012 4:59:57 PM

FIGURE 14.11 Voxel lesion-symptom mapping on 239 patients from the Iowa Patient Registry projected on the Iowa template brain. The right hemisphere is on the right in the hemispheric (upper) and transverse (lower two rows) depictions. The dark area shows the region of greatest overlap of lesions in patients with the lowest Block Design scores—i.e., the area that, when damaged, is associated with the greatest impairment in Block Design performance. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 112Lezak-Figures.indd 112 3/15/2012 4:59:58 PM3/15/2012 4:59:58 PM

FIGURE 14.12 Example of a WIS-type Object Assembly puzzle item. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 113Lezak-Figures.indd 113 3/15/2012 4:59:59 PM3/15/2012 4:59:59 PM

FIGURE 14.13 Test of Three-Dimensional Constructional Praxis, Form A (A.L. Benton). The three block models are presented successively to the subject. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lezak-Figures.indd 114Lezak-Figures.indd 114 3/15/2012 5:00:00 PM3/15/2012 5:00:00 PM

FIGURE 14.14 Illustrations of defective performances. (a) Simplifi ed construction with inaccurate choice of blocks. (b) “Closing-in phenomenon” in which the patient incorporates part of the model into the construction. From Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

(a)

(b)

Lezak-Figures.indd 115Lezak-Figures.indd 115 3/15/2012 5:00:01 PM3/15/2012 5:00:01 PM