11 modern-iuh

101
Danubio a Budapest Riccardo Rigon Peak Flows Friday, September 10, 2010

Transcript of 11 modern-iuh

Page 1: 11   modern-iuh

Dan

ub

io a

Bu

dap

est

Riccardo Rigon

Peak Flows

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 2: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

2

Summary

And it murmurs and shouts, it whispers, it speaks to you and smashes you, it evaporates in clouds dark strokes of black and it falls and bounces becoming person or plant, becoming earth, wind, blood, and thought.(Francesco Guccini)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 3: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

2

Summary

• In this lecture an introduction to fluvial peak flowpeak flows shall be made according to the theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph.

And it murmurs and shouts, it whispers, it speaks to you and smashes you, it evaporates in clouds dark strokes of black and it falls and bounces becoming person or plant, becoming earth, wind, blood, and thought.(Francesco Guccini)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 4: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

3

What is a peak flowpeak flow?

0200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Anno

Port

ate

m^3/s

1990 1995 2000 2005

Year

Dis

char

ge

m3 s

-1

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 5: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

4

0200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Anno

Port

ate

m^3/s

1990 1995 2000 2005

What is a peak flowpeak flow?

Year

Dis

char

ge

m3 s

-1

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 6: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

5

Aft

er D

ood

ge

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 7: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

6

THE HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF RIVER BASINS

Precipitation forecast

Calculation of surface runoff

Aggregation of flows

Propagation of flow

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 8: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

7

0 50 100 150

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Precipitazione [mm]

P[h]

1h

3h

6h

12h

24h

Tr = 10 anni

h1 h3 h6 h12 h24

PRECIPITATION

Precipitation [mm]

Tr = 10 years

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 9: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

8

0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0

60

80

100

120

140

160

Linee Segnalitrici di Possibilita' Pluviometrica

t [ore]

h [

mm

]

h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp

J(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tn−1p

PRECIPITATION

t [hours]

D-D-F Curves

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 10: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

9

EFFECTIVE PRECIPITATION

Jeff (tp, Tr) = φ J(tp, Tr)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 11: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

10

Flow coefficients

Type

Type

Ceramic roofsAsphalt pavingStone pavingMacadamGravel roadsFields and Gardens

Intensive zoneSemi-intensive zoneVilla residence zoneProtected areas (archaeological, sports)Parks

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 12: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

11

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Here shall be discussed a modern form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph theory

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)Jeff(τ) dτ

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 13: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

11

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Here shall be discussed a modern form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph theory

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)Jeff(τ) dτ

Discharge at the closing section

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 14: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

11

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Here shall be discussed a modern form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph theory

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)Jeff(τ) dτ

Discharge at the closing section

Instantaneous unit hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 15: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

11

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Here shall be discussed a modern form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph theory

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)Jeff(τ) dτ

Discharge at the closing section

Instantaneous unit hydrograph

Effective precipitation

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 16: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

12

In our case, having chosen a precipitation of constant intensity as design rainfall and having assumed that the effective rainfall is proportional to the precipitation, then:

Q(t) = A a(Tr)tn−1p

t

0IUH(t− τ)H(τ)H(tp = τ) dτ

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 17: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

13

H(x) =

0 x < 01 x ≥ 0

H(x) is known as the Heaviside step function or unit step function

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 18: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

14

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Linearity and invariance

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 19: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

15

It is linear because if the effective rainfall is multiplied by n the discharge increases proportionally.

Q∗(t) = A

t

0IUH(t− τ)J∗

eff (τ) dτ

J∗eff (τ) = n Jeff (τ)

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 20: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

16

Q∗(t) = A

t

0IUH(t− τ) n Jeff (τ) dτ = nQ(t)

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

It is linear because if the effective rainfall is multiplied by n the discharge increases proportionally.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 21: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

17

It is invariant because if the precipitation is translated in time the discharge is translated identically in time.

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 22: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

18

t=0 t=1

t=3

t=2

t=4

t=8t=7t=6

t=5

Hydrological response of a basin to rainfall of duration 3 instants

t

J

t

Q

t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Linearity and invariance

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 23: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

19

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)δ(τ) dτ

is the impulse function or “Dirac’s delta”δ

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 24: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

20

δ(τ)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 25: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

21

-4 -2 0 2 4

05

10

15

20

Delta function

t

density

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 26: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

22

> x <- seq(from=-5,to=5,by=0.01) curve(dnorm(x,0,1),from=-5,to=5,xlab="t",ylab="density",ylim=c(0,20),main="Delta function")> for(i in 1:6)lines(x,dnorm(x,0,1/2^i),from=-5,to=5,xlab="t",ylab="density",ylim=c(0,10))

R- Dirac’s Delta

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 27: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

23

x

−∞δ(τ)dτ =

0 x < 01 x ≥ 0

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 28: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

24

Q(t) =

t

0IUH(t− τ)δ(τ) dτ = IUH(t)

Furthermore:

Characteristics of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 29: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

25

If the rainfall is of constant intensity, p, over a time interval tp , then:

Q(t) = A p

t

0IUH(t− τ)H(τ)H(tp = τ) dτ

which becomes:

Q(t) = A p

t0 IUH(t) dτ 0 < t ≤ tp t0 IUH(t) dτ −

tp

0 IUH(t) dτ t > tp

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 30: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

26

The integral of the hydrograph has an S shape

And it is called S-Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 31: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

27

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 32: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

28

t1

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 33: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

29

t2

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 34: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

30

t3

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 35: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

31

t4

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 36: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

32

t5

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 37: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

33

t1t2

t3

t4

t5

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 38: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

34

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 39: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

35

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 40: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

36

v(t) =

k

vkIk(t)

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

The IUH(t) can be interpreted as a distribution of residence times Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979; Gupta and Waymire, 1980

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 41: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

37

v(t) =

k

vkIk(t)

The volume v(t) also represents a ratio of favourable cases (volumes present within the catchment) to total cases (the total number of possible events), that is the total number of volumes. Therefore, within the limit of an infinite number of volumes, it is the probability of the volumes being in the catchment.

More precisely, v(t) is umerically equal to the probability, P[T >t], that is the residence time of the water in the catchment is greater than the current time t.

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 42: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

38

Therefore, the mass balance in the catchment considered is:

dv

dt=

dP [T > t]dt

= δ(t)− IUH (t)

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 43: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

39

dv

dt=

dP [T > t]dt

= δ(t)− IUH (t)

Therefore, the mass balance in the catchment considered is:

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 44: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

39

dv

dt=

dP [T > t]dt

= δ(t)− IUH (t)

Instantaneous and unit effective precipitation

Therefore, the mass balance in the catchment considered is:

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 45: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

39

dv

dt=

dP [T > t]dt

= δ(t)− IUH (t)

Instantaneous and unit effective precipitation

Outflow discharge corresponding to an instantaneous and unit

precipitation inflow

Therefore, the mass balance in the catchment considered is:

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 46: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

40

Integrating there results:

P [T > t] = t

0δ(t)dt−

t

0IUH (t)dt

That is:

P [T < t] = t

0IUH (t)dt

from the definitions it results that the S hydrograph is a probability (which fully explains its shape).

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 47: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

41

Deriving both sides of the equation the result is:

pdf(t) = IUH(t)

quod erat demonstrandum

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 48: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

42

IUH(t) =1

λe−t/λ

where λ is a parameter which is NOT determined a priori. It is in fact determined a posteriori by means of an operation of “calibration”

II - Assuming the theory developed to be true, all is reduced to the determination of a probability density.In general, considerations of a dynamic nature bring to the identification of not one distribution but a family of distribution, for example:

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - IUH --> GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 49: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

43

Uniform Distribution

• A variable is uniformly distributed between x1 and x2 if its density is:

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 50: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

44

• If x1=0 and x2=tc then the probability (the S-Hydrograph) is :

P [T < t; tc] = t

tc0 < t < tc

1 t ≥ tc

• tc is called the time of concentration and the resulting hydrological model is the “kinematic” model.

Uniform Distribution

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 51: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

45

Exponential Distribution

λwhere is the mean residence time

pdf(t;λ) =1λ

e−t/λ

H(t)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 52: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

46

and the resulting hydrological model is known as the linear reservoir model.

P [T < t;λ] = (1− e−t/λ)

Exponential Distribution

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 53: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

Continuous distributions: Gamma

The Gamma distribution can be considered as a generalisation of the exponential distribution. It has the form:

It is the probability of time x elapsing before r events happens

The characteristic function of this distribution is:

This distribution is widely used in many applications. One of its applications is in prior probability generation for sample variance. For this the inverse Gamma distribution is used (by changing variable y = 1/x we get the inverse Gamma distribution). The Gamma distribution can also be generalised to non-integer values of r (by putting Γ(r) instead of (r-1)! )

47

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 54: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flows

Riccardo Rigon

48

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 55: 11   modern-iuh

Dan

ub

io a

Bu

dap

est

Peak Flowpeak flows

Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 56: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

50

Uniform Distribution

• A variable is uniformly distributed between x1 and x2 if its density is:

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 57: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

51

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Tempo di residenza [h]

P[T<t;uniforme(0,1)]

time of concentration

Uniform Distribution

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 58: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

52

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Tempo di residenza [h]

P[T<t;uniforme(0,1)]

Uniform Distribution

time of concentration

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 59: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

53

“Kinematic” Hydrograph

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time [h]

Dis

charg

e for

unit A

rea a

nd u

nit p

recip

itation

precipitation duration

time of concentration

The volumes of effective

precipitation increase

with duration in

accordance with

duration-depth-

frequency curves

Observations:

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 60: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

54

Observations:

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time [h]

Dis

charg

e for

unit A

rea a

nd u

nit p

recip

itation

• For precipitation durations that are less than the time of concentration the discharge increases linearly and peaks at the end of the precipitation duration. The peak flow continues until the time of concentration and then decreases.

• For precipitation durations that are greater than the time of concentration the peak flow is reached at the time of concentration, which then persists for the duration of the precipitation before decreasing.

“Kinematic” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 61: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

55

• If x1=0 and x2=tc then the probability (the S-Hydrograph) is :

Uniform Distribution

P [T < t; tc] = t

tc0 < t < tc

1 t ≥ tc

• tc is called the time of concentration and the resulting hydrological model is the “kinematic” model.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 62: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

56

Exponential Distribution

where is the mean residence time 1/λ

P [T < t;λ] = λ e−λ t

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 63: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

57

P [T < t;λ] = (1− e−λt)

Exponential Distribution

and the resulting hydrological model is known as the linear reservoir model.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 64: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

58

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Tempo di residenza [h]

P[T<t;exp(1)]

Exponential Distribution

Residence time [h]

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 65: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

59

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Tempo di residenza [h]

Pro

babili

t.. E

sponezia

le

Exponential Distribution

Residence time [h]

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 66: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

60

Hydrograph of the “linear reservoir”

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time [h]

Dis

charg

e for

unit A

rea a

nd u

nit p

recip

itation

precipitation duration

The volumes of effective

precipitation increase

with duration

Observations:

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 67: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

61

0 1 2 3 4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time [h]

Dis

charg

e for

unit A

rea a

nd u

nit p

recip

itation

precipitation duration

The precipitation volumes,

like the duration, are

constant.

Observations:

Hydrograph of the “linear reservoir”

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 68: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

62

seq(from=-0.01,to=4,by=0.01) -> xplot(x,punif(x,min=0,max=1),type="l",col="red",ylab="Probabilità uniforme",xlab="Tempo di residenza [h]")plot(x,dunif(x,min=-0,max=1),type="l",col="red",ylab="P[T<t;uniforme(0,1)]",xlab="Tempo di residenza [h]")

R for the “Kinematic” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 69: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

63

iuh.kinematic <- function(t,tc,tp) ifelse(t<tp,punif(t,min=0,max=tc),punif(t,min=0,max=tc)-punif(t-tp,min=0,max=tc))

iuh.kinematic(x,1,0.5) -> kh1plot(x,kh1,type="l",col="blue",ylab="Discharge for unit Area and unit precipitation",xlab="Time [h]",xlim=c(0,4),ylim=c(0,1))iuh.kinematic(x,1,1) -> kh2lines(x,kh2,col="darkblue")iuh.kinematic(x,1,2) -> kh3lines(x,kh3,col="black")

R for the “Kinematic” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 70: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

64

(1/sqrt(0.5))*iuh.kinematic(x,1,0.5) -> kh1plot(x,kh1,type="l",col="blue",ylab="Discharge for unit Area and varying precipitation",xlab="Time [h]",xlim=c(0,4),ylim=c(0,1))iuh.kinematic(x,1,1) -> kh2lines(x,kh2,col="darkblue")(1/sqrt(2))*iuh.kinematic(x,1,2) -> kh3lines(x,kh3,col="black")

R for the “Kinematic” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 71: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

65

seq(from=-0.01,to=4,by=0.01) -> xplot(x,pexp(x,rate=1),type="l",col="red",ylab="Probabilità Esponeziale",xlab="Tempo di residenza [h]")plot(x,dexp(x,rate=1),type="l",col="red",ylab="P[T<t;exp(1)]",xlab="Tempo di residenza [h]")

R- “Linear Reservoir” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 72: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

66

iuh.exponential <- function(t,lambda,tp) ifelse(t<tp,pexp(t,rate=lambda),pexp(t,rate=lambda)-pexp(t-tp,rate=lambda)) iuh.exponential(x,1,0.5) -> kh1plot(x,kh1,type="l",col="blue",ylab="Discharge for unit Area and unit precipitation",xlab="Time [h]",xlim=c(0,4),ylim=c(0,1))iuh.exponential(x,1,1) -> kh2lines(x,kh2,col="darkblue")iuh.exponential(x,1,2) -> kh3lines(x,kh3,col="black")

R- “Linear Reservoir” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 73: 11   modern-iuh

Peak Flowpeak flows - Addendum

Riccardo Rigon

67

iuh.exponential(x,1,1) -> kh1plot(x,kh1,type="l",col="blue",ylab="Discharge for unit Area and unit precipitation",xlab="Time [h]",xlim=c(0,4),ylim=c(0,1))iuh.exponential(x,2,1) -> kh2lines(x,kh2,col="darkblue")iuh.exponential(x,3,1) -> kh3lines(x,kh3,col="black")

R- “Linear Reservoir” Hydrograph

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 74: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Dan

ub

io a

Bu

dap

est

Riccardo Rigon

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 75: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

69

The statistical character of the unit hydrograph implies one relevant

consequence:

I - A problem of the representativity the statistical sample (that is to say the

definition of a minimal areal structure within which the system is ergodic).

Technically we speak of Representative Elementary Area (REA). By all means

the forecasting uncertainties are all the greater the smaller the system is.

Methods for the summation of surface runoff - Observations

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 76: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

70

There are three principal elements to the geomorphological analysis of catchments areas:

GIUH

1. The rigorous demonstration of the equivalence between the distribution

function of the residence times within the catchment and the instantaneous

unit hydrograph, as shown in the previous chapter;

2. The partition of the catchment into hydrologically distinct units and teh

formal interpretation of the existing relations between these parts (usually called

“states”), each one of which is characterised by its own distribution of residence

times in what is usually identified with the term Geomorphic Instantaneous Unit

Hydrograph (GIUH). This operation essentially consists of the formal writing of

the continuity equations for a catchment that is spatially articulated and complex.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 77: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

71

3. The determination of the functional form of the single

distributions of the residence times on the basis of considerations of

the hydraulics of natural environments and the geometric

characteristics that regulate motion.

GIUH

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 78: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

72

The division of the catchment begins with the identification of the

hydrographic network.

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 79: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

73

This is followed by the identification of the drainage areas composing the

catchment.

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 80: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

74

Rinaldo, Geomorphic Flood Research, 2006

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 81: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

75

In the catchment just seen, five drainage areas (Ai) were identified and, as a

consequence five paths for the water:

A1 → c1 → c3 → c5 → ΩA2 → c2 → c3 → c5 → Ω

A3 → c3 → c5 → ΩA4 → c4 → c5 → Ω

A5 → c5 → Ω

Each path is subdivided into sections and each ci represents channel

sections between to successive branches.

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 82: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

76

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar (urban catchments)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 83: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

77

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar (urban catchments)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 84: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

78

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar (urban catchments)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 85: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

79A1 → c1 → c3 → c5 → Ω

The drainage area:

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 86: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

80A1 → c1 → c3 → c5 → Ω

The head channel section:

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 87: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

81A1 → c1 → c3 → c5 → ΩR

inal

do, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

The first channel section:

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 88: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

82

In the partition process there is, of course, a

certain freedom in the tessellation of the

catchment. However, the choices should be

made according to motivated dynamic and/or

geomorphological considerations. The partition

just seen, in fact, was made assuming that:

•the flow on the hillsopes are described by a

distribution of residence times which is

different for the one for flows in channels

•the flow on the hillslopes depends on the

drainage area

•the the flow in the channels depends on the

length of the channels.

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Partition of the catchment into areas that are hydrologically similar

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 89: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

83

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

The partition also assumes that the residence

times in each identified “state” in each path can

be “composed”. The total residence time (as a

random variable) of the path shown here is

therefore assigned as:

T1 = TA1 + Tc1 + Tc3 + Tc5

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 90: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

84

T1 is not a number but a variable that can

assume different values, depending on the

sample values of the the component

processes (A1, C1, C3,C5). Of this variable,

however, it is possible to know the

distribution, under the hypothesis of

stochastic independence of the single

events. In this case:

pdfT1(t) = (pdfA1 ∗ pdfc1 ∗ pdfc3 ∗ pdfc5)(t)

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 91: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

85

The above is formal writing which says:

The distribution of the residence times of the

path is equal to the convolution of the

distributions of residence times of the single

states.

pdfT1(t) = (pdfA1 ∗ pdfc1 ∗ pdfc3 ∗ pdfc5)(t)

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 92: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

86

Given two distributions, i.e. pdfA1(t) e pdfC1(t), the convolution operation

is defined as:

If we consider a third distribution, i.e. pdfC3(t), then:

pdfA1∗C1(t) := (pdfA1 ∗ pdfc1)(t) = t

−∞pdfA1(t− τ) pdfc1(τ)dτ

pdfA1∗C1∗C3(t) := (pdfA1 ∗ pdfc1 ∗ pdfc1)(t) = t

−∞pdfA1∗C1(t− τ ) pdfc3(τ

)dτ

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 93: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

87

Here shown are all the paths. One of the

hypotheses of the IUH is to consider that

the contribution of the single paths is

obtained by linear superimposition (sum)

of the single contributions:

GIUH(t) =

N

i=1

pi pdfi(t)

where N is the number of paths, pdfi(t) the

distribution of residence times relative to

each path and pi the probability that the

precipitation volumes fall into the i-th path

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 94: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

88

GIUH(t) =

N

i=1

pi pdfi(t)

in the case of uniform precipitations pi

coincides with the fraction of area relative to

the i-th path.

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 95: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

89

Rin

ald

o, G

eom

orp

hic

Flo

od

Res

earc

h, 2

00

6

GIUH - Composition of the residence times

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 96: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

90

GIUH

Therefore, the complete expression of the GIUH is:

And the outflow discharge is:

Q(t) = A

t

0GIUH(t− τ) Jeff (τ)dτ

GIUH(t) =

N

i=1

pi (pdfAi ∗ .... ∗ ACN )(t)

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 97: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

91

GIUH Identification of the pdf’s

Drainage areas (or hillslopes):

pdfA(t;λ) = λe−λ t

H(t)

Where is the inverse of the residence time

in the area (different formulae can be used,

in practice to estimate it).

λ

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 98: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

92

Channels:

Where L is the length of the channel up to

the outfall and u is the celerity of water in

the channel

pdfC(t;u, L) = δ(L− u t)

GIUH Identification of the pdf’s

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 99: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

93

GIUHThe composition

pdfA∗C(t;λ, u, L) = t

0λ(t− τ)H(t− τ)δ(L− u τ) dτ

Channels:

Solving the integral, taking advantage of the properties of

Dirac’s delta, there results:

pdfA∗C(t;λ, u, L) = λ e−λ (t−u/L)

H(t− L/u)

Which is a tri-parametric family of distributions.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 100: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

94

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Tempo di residenza [h]

Q(t)

L/u

GIUH

Residence time [h]

Friday, September 10, 2010

Page 101: 11   modern-iuh

GIUH

Riccardo Rigon

95

Thank you for your attention!

Friday, September 10, 2010