-
Upload
fahmi-fuadul -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of [email protected]
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
1/6
Photocatalytic activity of undoped and Ag-doped TiO2-supported zeolite for
humic
acid
degradation and
mineralization
C. Lazau a,1, C. Ratiu a,b,1, C. Orha a,1, R. Pode c, F. Manea c,*aNational Institute for Research and Development in Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, Timisoara, Condensed Matter Department, P. Andronescu no.1,
300254 Timisoara, RomaniabNational Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romaniac ‘‘Politehnica’’ University of Timisoara, P-ta Victoriei no.2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
1. Introduction
Photocatalysts based on TiO2 have been intensively investigat-
ed in order to achieve better photocatalytic efficiency for different
applications such as decomposition of various organic pollutants
from water and air. Recently, studies on the doping of transition
metal and non-metal ions into TiO2 and the immobilization of TiO2on supports have become attractive in the area of photocatalysis
[1–5]. Various substrates have been used as a catalyst support for
the photocatalytic degradation of polluted water, such as glass and
stainless steel [6], alumina beds [7,8], activated carbons [9,10],
MCM-41 [11–14] and zeolites [5,11,15–19]. The results revealed
that supports possess good pollutant adsorption, diffusion
properties and absence of light absorption, which exhibited the
enhancement of photocatalytic activity of dispersed TiO2 [20,21].
Zeolites have been chosen as support since they can delocalize
band gap excited electrons of TiO2 and thereby minimize electron-
hole recombination [11]. In addition, the ability of zeolites favoring
photoinduced electron-transfer reactions and retarding undesired
back electron transfer has been reported [11]. Supporting TiO2 in
zeolite matrix depends on several factors, such as location and
migration of cations, strength of the interactions between cations,
and guest molecules dimensions of cavities and channels. The
combination of the two properties will lead to distinct and
different properties as compared to those with semiconductor
alone. The functionalization of zeolite with TiO2 can be carried out
through three ways, namely solid–solid, solid–liquid and solid–gas
reactions. Solid-state reactions between inorganic species have
been studied [22,23], however, to the best of our knowledge, no
solid-state reaction in hydrothermal conditions between TiO2powders with natural zeolite has been studied.
Recently, numerous applications towards the synthesis of
inorganic materials have gained greater importance [24]. Our
previous studies also reported the synthesis of supported TiO2 on
the natural zeolite through sol–gel, hydrothermal and solid–solid
methods [25–27]. The microwave offers several advantages over
the conventional routes. The most important are the improvement
of reaction yields and the increase in reaction rates. Microwaves
are also used in synthesis to improve the nanometer size fraction of
particles [28]. In addition, microwaves save energy and appear
today as a new technology for the development of the green
chemistry, with synthesis methods involving preparation proce-
dures based on solvent-free or reduced amount of reactant [26]. In
the late 1980s, microwave heating was introduced to the synthesis
of zeolites. Compared with conventional heating in air ovens,
microwave heating can greatly shorten synthesis time and produce
zeolites with high purity and narrow particle size distribution
Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–1921
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 7 March 2011
Received in revised form 18 June 2011
Accepted 14 July 2011
Available online 23 July 2011
Keywords:
A. Microporous materials
A. Nanostructures
B. Sol–gel chemistry
C. X-ray diffraction
D. Catalytic properties
A B S T R A C T
Thehybridmaterialsbased onnatural zeolite andundoped and Ag-dopedTiO2, i.e., Z-Na-TiO2 andZ-Na-
TiO2-Ag, were successfully synthesized by solid-state reaction in microwave-assisted hydrothermal
conditions. Undoped TiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2 nanocrystals were previously synthesized by sol–gel
method. The surface characterization of undoped TiO2/Ag-doped TiO2 and natural zeolite hybrid
materials has been investigated by X-ray diffraction, DRUV-VIS spectroscopy, FT-IR spectroscopy, BET
analysis, SEM microscopy and EDX analysis. The results indicated that anatase TiO2 is the dominant
crystalline type as spherical form onto zeolitic matrix. The presence of Ag into Z-Na-TiO2-Ag was
confirmed by EDX analysis. The DRUV-VIS spectra showed that Z-Na-TiO2-Ag exhibited absorption
within the range of 400–500 nm in comparison with Z-Na-TiO2 catalyst. The enhanced photocatalytic
activity of Z-Na-TiO2-Ag catalyst is proved through the degradation and mineralization of humic acid
under ultraviolet and visible irradiation.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +40 256 403069; fax: +40 256 403069.
E-mail address: [email protected] (F. Manea).1 Tel: +40 256 494413, Fax: +40 256 204693.
Contents
lists
available
at
ScienceDirect
Materials Research Bulletin
jo u rn al h omep a ge : ww w.els evier .co m/loc ate /matresb u
0025-5408/$ – see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00255408http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00255408mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
2/6
[29,30]. These advantages reveal it as a promising way to
prepare high-quality zeolite membranes in a short time. Koegler
and coworkers [31] reported that the microwave heating is very
effectively to study synthesis parameters of zeolite by showing
in relation with dependence of temperature profile of the
synthesis mixture on the conventional and microwave heating.
Other researchers have successfully prepared a film of NaA and
AlPO45 crystals on Al2O3 and gold substrates, respectively,
using a microwave heating [32–34]. They found that the
microwave conditions affect the thickness and the orientation
of zeolite crystals. All these above-presented advantages reclaim
microwaves as suitable for annealing.
Humic acid (HA) is the main constituent of natural organic
matter (NOM) from water resources responsible for water colour
and odour, and it is considered to be the precursor of carcinogenic
products like trihalomethanes (THMs) formed during water
disinfection using chlorine. Based on these considerations, the
degradation of the HA prior to disinfection step for drinking water
treatment is necessary. The effective degradation of humic acid
from water by photocatalytic oxidation based on TiO2 catalyst has
been reported [35,36].
In the present study, hybrid materials based on natural zeolite
modified with undoped TiO2/Ag-doped TiO2 were synthesized by
solid-state reaction in microwave-assisted hydrothermal condi-tions. X-ray diffraction, FT-IR spectroscopy, DRUV-VIS spectrosco-
py, BET and SEM/EDX analysis were used for the characterization of
hybrid materials. The performances of the photocatalytic activities
of the hybrid materials were determined comparatively for the
degradation of humic acid from water by photocatalysis under UV
irradiation at wavelengths of 254 nm and VIS irradiation at
wavelengths of 450 nm. Also, the photocatalytic activities for the
humic acid mineralization were assessed.
2.
Materials
and
methods
2.1. Chemicals
Romanian zeolitic mineral from Mirsid, used as support fordoped TiO2 loading, was supplied by Cemacon Company, Romania.
The mineral was powdered and sieved with a Multilab sieve
shaker.
The
diameter
of
grains
size
selected
to
carry
out
the
experiments
was
between
315
and
500
mm
with
the
mass
composition 62.20% SiO2, 11.65% Al2O3, 1.30% Fe2O3, 3.74% CaO,
0.67% MgO, 3.30% K2O, 0.72% Na2O and 0.28% TiO2.
Titanium
(IV)
isopropoxide
(TTIP,
98%),
silver
nitrate
(AgNO3),
hydrochloric
acid
(HCl),
ethanol,
sodium
nitrate
(NaNO3) and nitric
acid (HNO3) were purchased from ALDRICH Company.
2.2.
Preparation
of
photocatalyst
The hybrid materials based on natural zeolite modified with
undoped
TiO2 and
Ag-doped
TiO2 nanocrystals
were
prepared
bysolid-state
reaction
in
microwave-assisted
hydrothermal
condi-
tions.
The
hybrid
materials
synthesis
are
performed
in
two
steps,
in
the first one the undoped and doped TiO2 nanocrystals were
synthesized by sol–gel method (1) and the second step supposed
the
hybrid
material
synthesis
by
solid-state
reaction
in
micro-
wave-assisted
hydrothermal
conditions
(2).
The undoped and silver doped TiO2 (Ag-doped TiO2) nanocrys-
tals were synthesized by sol–gel method. An amount of ethanol
was
stirred
with
5
mL
TTIP
and
after
10
min,
30
mL
of
distilled
water
was
added
in
dropwise.
The
pH
of
the
initial
solution
was
5.5
and before adding the doping precursor (AgNO3) the pH was
adjusted with HNO3. The solutions were filtered, washed and dried
to
60
8C
for
5
h.
For
crystallization
the
materials
were
annealed
into
an
oven
at
the
temperature
range
between
300
and
600
8
C for
2
h.
The preparation of the chemically modified zeolite presumes
two stages to reach acid form (H form) by using 2 M HCl solution
and sodium form (Na form) with 2 M NaNO3 solution for a more
efficient ion exchange. Consequently, Na forms of clinoptilolite are
expected to remove other cations easily in ion-exchange applica-
tions. For that reason, Na forms are the forms that most frequently
prepared for research in clinoptilolite literature [37]. The hybrid
materials based on natural zeolite and undoped and doped TiO2were synthesized by solid-state reaction through microwave-
assisted hydrothermal method, in aqueous solution. The micro-
wave synthesis was performed in a microwave reaction system,
Multiwave 3000, produced by Anton Paar at 2.45 GHz for a
continuous power of 1000 W.The temperature measurements are
recorded with an IR sensor depending on autoclave solution
content. Therefore, an amount of natural zeolite as Na form was
mixed with 40 mL distilled water and undoped TiO2/Ag-doped
TiO2 nanocrystals (2 wt%) under continuous stirring for 4 h. The
obtained solutions were introduced into a Teflon autoclave with a
50% degree of fullness, for 30 min to 180 8C, under microwave
radiations. After autoclaving, the hybrid materials (Z-Na-TiO2 and
Z-Na-TiO2-Ag) were washed with distilled water and dried at 60 8C
for 5 h.
2.3. Characterization of hybrid material
The crystallinity of the prepared samples was measured by X-
Ray diffraction (XRD) using PANalytical X’PertPRO MPD Difract-
ometer with Cu tube. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using
Inspect S PANalytical model coupled with the energy dispersive X-
ray analysis detector (EDX) was used to characterize the external
surfaces of the hybrid materials, using catalyst powder supported
on carbon tape. The specific surface areas of the materials were
determined by BET using an ASAP 2020 Micromeritics system. The
light absorption properties of the hybrid materials were studied by
UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRUV-VIS), performed
under ambient conditions using Lambda 950 Perkin Elmer in the
wavelength
range
of
200–430
nm.
The
blank
board
was
used
as
the
reference. The bond vibration of modified materials was analyzedby Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR) using a JASCO
FT/IR-430 spectrometer.
2.4.
Photocatalytic
degradation
procedure
and
analytical
methods
The photocatalytic activities of the prepared catalyst hybrid
materials
were
assessed
through
degradation
of
50
mg
L 1 humic
acid
in
an
RS-1
photocatalytic
reactor
(Heraeus,
Germany).
The
volume of the reaction solution was 200 ml, into which 0.2 g of
photocatalyst was added. UV and VIS irradiation was provided by a
medium-pressure
Hg
lamp
(300
W).
After
irradiation
time
of
2
h,
the
suspension
was
sampled
and
filtered
through
a
0.2
mm
membrane filter. The concentration of humic acid was measured in
terms
of
absorbance
at
254
nm
( A254)
and
436
nm
( A436)
with
aCarry
100
Varian
spectrophotometer.
Also,
the
mineralization
degree
was
assessed
by
monitoring
total
organic
carbon
(TOC)
parameter using Carbon Multi N/C 2100S Analyzer, Analytik Jena.
The degradation ratio ( X ) of the reactant can be calculated as
X (%)
=
100( A0 A)/ A0, and mineralization ratio was determined
used
the
same
relation
using
TOC
parameter
instead
of
A
value.
3. Results and discussion
3.1.
XRD
analysis
The XRD patterns of TiO2 nanocrystals annealed at different
temperatures
are
illustrated
in
Fig.
1. It
is
known
that
annealing
improved
the
crystallization
of
TiO2 powders
and
accelerated
the
C. Lazau et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–1921 1917
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
3/6
transformation
from
amorphous
phase
to
anatase
or
rutile
phase.
It
can
be
seen
that
for
a
temperature
of
300
8C
the
crystalline
phase
of
undoped TiO2 nanocrystals reveals anatase form and by tempera-
ture increasing at 400 8C the phase transition from anatase to rutile
occurred
(Fig.
1i).
At
600
8C the
anatase
phase
of
undoped
TiO2 is
almost
disappeared
and
the
rutile
form
is
predominantly
(Fig.
1i).
In according with the literature [38,39], this behavior is expected
and can be explained by the effect of the annealing temperature on
the
anatase
phase,
which
become
metastable
at
higher
tempera-
ture
and
it
is
converted
into
stable
rutile
phase.
The
Ag-doped
TiO2nanocrystals exhibited a different behavior under the same
annealing
temperature
rang.
The
pure
anatase
form
was
noticeduntil
to
600
8C
temperature,
without
the
appearance
of
the
rutile
form
(Fig.
1ii).
Based
on
the
literature
data
[40]
this
behavior
is
own
to the fact that the presence of Ag ions decreased the oxygen
vacancy concentration, which inhibited the phase transition under
the
studied
temperatures
range.
Thus,
the
diffraction
peaks
of
anatase
TiO2 corresponding to 2u : 25.38, 378, 37.88, 38.68, 488, 548,
558 [41] and of rutile phase to 2u : 27.38, 35.98, 41.18, 54.18 were
noticed [42]. Crystallite size was calculated by the use of Scherrer
formula
i.e.,
D
=
kl / bcos
u .
The
average
particle
size
obtained
for
anatase
from
XRD
data
for
undoped
and
doped
nanocrystals
were
about 10 nm.
Taking into account that in general,the anatase form exhibited an
improved
photocatalytic
activity
in
comparison
with
rutile
form,
for
the
further
experiments
regarding
obtaining
zeolite-based
hybrid
materials were selected the TiO2 materials crystallized as anataseform, i.e., undoped TiO2 annealed 300 8C and Ag-doped TiO2annealed 600 8C. Anatase TiO2 exhibits higher photocatalytic
activity than rutile TiO2 due to its conduction band position which
demonstrates stronger reducing power [6].
Fig. 2 described XRD patterns of hybrid materials based on
natural zeolite and undoped/Ag-doped TiO2 nanocrystals, i.e., Z-
Na-TiO2 and Z-Na-TiO2-Ag. For comparison, the XRD pattern of
the natural zeolite in Na form is also shown in Fig. 2 (spectra a).
The presented results revealed that the natural zeolite used is
mostly clinoptilolite (2u : 108; 22.58; 308) [25]. It can be seen that
the main peak positions of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) are
unchanged, indicating that the structure of natural zeolite has a
good
thermal stabilization, after the microwave-assisted hydro-
thermal treatment. In comparison with the XRD pattern of thenatural zeolite in Na form, the specific peaks corresponding to
anatase TiO2 form recorded at 2u : 25.38, 378 and 38.68 were
noticed for both Z-Na-TiO2 and Z-Na-TiO2-Ag hybrid materials.
3.2. DRUV-VIS spectroscopy
DRUV-VIS
patterns
are
examined
to
determine
the
light
absorption
quantification
and
absorption
wavelength
range
corre-
lated with band gap energy. Fig. 3 presents an intense absorption
maximum at 250 nm, which can be assigned to isolated titanium
with
tetrahedral
coordination.
Another
absorption
range
found
in
the
range
of
300–370
nm
indicates
that
some
titanium
is
also
in
an
octahedral environment [43].
For
the
hybrid
material
modified
with
undoped
TiO2 theabsorption
bands
intensity
is
higher
in
UV
domain,
because
the
anatase
form
of
undoped
TiO2 with the band gap energy about
3.2 eV strongly adsorbs in this domain [44]. The low doping degree
with Ag of the hybrid material led to a slight shifting of the
absorption
band
to
the
visible
range.
3.3. FT-IR analysis
Fig.
4i and
ii
show
FT-IR
spectra
obtained
for
the
hybrid
materials
in
comparison
with
Na
form
of
the
zeolite.
The
bands
at
3540 and 3360 cm1 have been attributed to the symmetric and
antisymmetric stretching modes of molecular water coordinated
to
the
magnesium
at
the
edges
of
the
channels.
The
presence
of
doped
TiO2 into
hybrid
materials
seems
to
affect
the
symmetric
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of (i) undoped and (ii) Ag-doped TiO2 nanocrystals at differentcalcination temperatures (*, anatase; *, rutile).
Fig. 2. XRD patterns for (a) Z-Na, (b) Z-Na-TiO2 and (c) Z-Na-TiO2-Ag (*, anatase
TiO2; ^, clinoptilolite).
C. Lazau et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–19211918
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
4/6
stretching modes of water coordinated to the magnesium at the
edges of channels (Fig. 4i). The band at 1630–1640 cm1(Lewis
sites) region is assigned to the zeolite water in channels of thesamples. The shoulders at 1350 cm1 noticed for the hybrid
materials (Z-Na-TiO2 and Z-Na-TiO2-Ag) can be attributed to
stretching and vibration of the Ti-O-Ti group, indicating the
formation of the inorganic matrix [45]. For the hybrid materials
synthesized by solid-state reaction in microwave-assisted
hydrothermal conditions the corresponding tetrahedral loadings
bands from 450 to 900 cm1 are not modified, so the zeolite
network is not affected (Fig. 4ii). FT-IR results clearly showed for
hybrid materials in comparison with Z-Na some modifications
specific to presence of TiO2 bounded at zeolite within absorption
band range between 945 and 860cm1. Thus, according to Liu
et al. [46] the absorption bands at 920 and 860 cm1 are
originated from the Ti-O stretching vibration and Ti-O-Ti linkage
vibration, respectively [47,48]. Also, the absorption band range
from945 to 905 cm1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of
Ti-O-Si and Ti-O-Al [48].
3.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray
analysis (EDX) results
The SEM images (Fig. 5a–d) present the lamellar texture of
clinoptilolite, according to the literature data [49]. The TiO2particles are distributed randomized and form cluster agglomerate
groups on the surface and in site of zeolite channels. At a larger
magnification times (mag. 12,000), it is obvious that the TiO2nanocrystals (spherical form) are non-uniformly distributed on thezeolite surface, forming the porous surface (Fig. 5b and d). EDX
microprobe provided a semiquantitative elemental analysis of the
Fig. 3. DRUV-VIS spectra of hybrid materials (a) Z-Na-TiO2, (b) Z-Na-TiO2-Ag and (c)
Z-Na.
Fig. 4. (i) FT-IR spectra of (a) Z-Na, (b) Z-Na-TiO2-Ag and (c) Z-Na-TiO2 for the wavelength range of 4000–400 cm1; (ii) FT-IR spectra of (a) Z-Na, (b) Z-Na-TiO2-Ag and (c) Z-
Na-TiO2 for
the
wavelength
range
of
1300–400
cm
1
.
C. Lazau et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–1921 1919
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
5/6
surface indicating that Ti and Ag were present on the zeolite
surface.
Also,
this
natural
zeolite
contain
the
major
elements
such
as
Na,
Si,
Al,
Ca,
K
and
Mg
as
can
be
seen
from
the
EDX
spectra
(Inset
Fig. 5b and d).
BET surface area value of Z-Na-TiO2-Ag is found to be higher
(59.45
m2 g1)
compared
to
Z-Na-TiO2 (19.83 m2 g1)
indicating
the
more
porous
surface
with
the
possibility
of
application
for
efficient catalytic material.
3.5.
Photocatalytic
activity
The prepared hybrid materials, Z-Na-TiO2 and Z-Na-TiO2-Ag
were used to degrade and mineralize humic acid under ultraviolet
and
visible
light
irradiation
for
2
h,
and
the
results
are
presented
in
Fig.
6. A
slight
degradation
of
humic
acid
assessed
in
terms
of
A254and A436 occurred under VIS irradiation (11% for A254 and 14% A436)
by photolysis process, conducted under the similar conditions with
photocatalysis
in
the
absence
of
the
photocatalyst.
Applying
photolysis
under
UV
irradiation
better
results
regarding
degrada-
tion degree were achieved (27% for A254 and 41% A436), which
informed about the photo-sensitive character of humic acid, much
better
under
UV
than
VIS
irradiation.
However,
the
mineralization
degrees
evaluated
in
terms
of
TOC
parameter
(8%
under
UV
irradiation and 5% under VIS irradiation) showed a negligible effect
to
evaluate
the
mineralization
activity
of
the
photocatalyst.
Under
all
applied
irradiation
conditions,
the
best
results
were
reached
for
the degradation of humic acid expressed by A436 corresponding to
the chromophore groups that denoted the colour. This aspect was
an
expected
one
because
in
general,
during
the
photocatalytic
process
the
chromophore
groups
are
most
susceptible
for
breakage. The decrease of A254 informed about the possibility of
the
aromatic
ring
opening
during
degradation
process.
Fig.
6
showsthat
humic
acid
can
be
mineralized
up
to
21%
under
VIS
irradiation
and
32%
under
UV
irradiation
using
Z-Na-TiO2-Ag in comparison
with 12% under VIS irradiation and 25% under UV irradiation using
Z-Na-TiO2, which suggested that the presence of silver in TiO2particles
enhanced
the
mineralization
and
quite
degradation
efficiency
of
humic
acid.
These
results
can
be
explained
by
silver
acting to prevent hole and electron recombination in TiO2, thus
enhancing the photocatalytic activity [50] both under UV and
especially
under
VIS
irradiation.
Also,
the
higher
specific
surface
area
of
the
Z-Na-TiO2-Ag should improve its photocatalytic
activity. Nevertheless, the high difference between the degrada-
tion and mineralization efficiencies were noticed, which informed
about
an
incomplete
degradation
of
humic
acid,
with
possible
production
of
intermediates.
Fig. 5. SEM morphology for Z-Na-TiO2-Ag (a and b) and Z-Na-TiO2 (c and d). Inset : EDX spectra for elemental analysis of Z-Na-TiO2-Ag (inset (b)) and Z-Na-TiO2 (inset (d)).
C. Lazau et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–19211920
-
8/17/2019 [email protected]
6/6
4.
Conclusions
The hybrid materials based on natural zeolite and undoped and
Ag-doped
TiO2 were successfully synthesized by solid-state
reaction in microwave-assisted hydrothermal conditions. Theoptimum annealing temperature was set up at 300 8C for undoped
TiO2 and 600 8C for Ag-doped TiO2 to obtain pure anatase TiO2form.
XRD
results
proved
the
presence
of
anatase
form
of
undoped
and
Ag-doped
TiO2 onto zeolite. Silver presence was confirmed by
EDX analysis. The FT-IR spectra evidenced the presence on TiO2bounded at the zeolite network by Ti-O-Al and Ti-O-Si, which
indicated
the
load
of
TiO2 into zeolite more durable than simple
physical
combination.
The
DRUV-VIS
spectra
indicated
that
for
Ag-
doped TiO2 nanocrystals onto natural zeolite the absorption bands
were slightly shifted to the visible range, and led to a stronger
visible
light
response
than
undoped
TiO2 onto zeolite. The Ag-
doped
TiO2 onto zeolitic matrix exhibited an enhanced photo-
catalytic activity on degradation and mineralization of humic acid
under
both
ultraviolet
and
visible
light
irradiation
in
comparisonwith
undoped
TiO2 onto zeolitic matrix.
Acknowledgements
This
study
was
supported
by
the
Sectoral
Operational
Programme
Human
resources
Development
(SOP
HRD),
financed
from the European Social Fund and by the Romanian Government
under the contract number POSDRU/89/1.5/S/63700 and by the
Romanian
National
Project
No.
72–156/2008
NANOZEOREZID.
The
authors
thank
to
the
X-ray
Diffraction
and
Electron
Microscopy
Laboratories from the Characterization Department of National
Institute for Research and Development in Electrochemistry and
Condensed Matter, Timisoara for the characterization results.
References
[1] M.I. Litter, J.A. Navio, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 98 (3) (1996) 171–181.[2] K. Wilke, H.D. Breuer, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 121 (1) (1999) 49–53.[3] H. Yahiro, T. Miyamoto, N. Watanabe, H. Yamaura, Catal. Today 120 (2007)
158–162.[4] Y.A. Cao, W.S. Yang, W.F. Zhang, G.Z. Liu, P.L. Yue, New J. Chem. 28 (2004)
218–222.[5] P. Guo, X. Wang, H. Guo, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 90 (2009) 677–687.[6] G. Li Puma, A. Bono, D. Krishnaiah, J.G. Collin, J. Hazard. Mater. 157 (2008)
209–219.[7] S. Sakthivel, M.V. Shankar, M. Palanichamy, B. Arabindoo, V. Murugesan, J.
Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 148 (2002) 153–159.[8] N. Takeda, T. Torimoto, S. Sampath, S. Kuwabata, H. Yoneyama, J. Phys. Chem. 99
(1995) 9986–9991.[9] H. Yoneyama, T. Torimoto, Catal. Today 58 (2000) 133–140.[10] J. Shi, J. Zheng, P. Wu, X. Ji, Catal. Commun. 9 (9) (2008) 1846–1850.[11] M.V. Shankar, S. Anandan, N. Venkatachalam, B. Arabindoo, V. Murugesan,
Chemosphere 63 (2006) 1014–1021.[12] E.P. Reddy, L. Davydov, P. Smirniotis, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 42 (2003) 1–11.[13] M. Noorjahan, V. Durga Kumari, M. Subrahmanyam, P. Boule, Appl. Catal. B:
Environ. 47 (2004) 209–213.[14] G. Li, X.S. Zhao, M.B. Ray, Sep. Purif. Technol. 55 (2007) 91–97.[15] S. Anandan,M. Yoon, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 4 (2003) 5–18.
[16] H. Chen, A. Matsumoto, N. Nishimiya, K. Tsutsumi, ColloidsSurf. A: Physicochem.Eng. Aspects 157 (1999) 295–305.
[17] M. Liu, X. Guo, X. Wang, C.-H. Liang, C. Li, Catal. Today 93–95 (2004) 659–664.[18] F . Li, S. Sun, Y. Jiang, M. Xia, M. Sun, B. Xue, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008)
1037–1044.[19] W. Panpa, P. Sujaridworakun, S. Jinawath, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 80 (2008)
271–276.[20] N. Dubey, S.S. Rayalu, N.K. Labhsetwar, R.R. Naidu, R.V. Chatti, S. Devotta, Appl.
Catal. A: Gen. 303 (2006) 152–157.[21] M. Takeuchi, T. Kimura,M. Hidaka, D. Rakhmawaty, M. Anpo, J. Catal. 246(2007)
235–240.[22] K.Tenzin,S. Chojay, S.Tenzin,J. Rabten,S.B. Lama,H. Sudrajat, J. Appl. Sci.Environ.
Sanit. (2009) 52–58.[23] H. Lachheb, E. Puzenat, A. Houas, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, C. Guillard, J.M. Hermann,
Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 39 (2002) 75–90.[24] B. Damardji, H. Khalaf, L. Duclaux, B. David, Appl. Clay Sci. 44 (2009) 201–205.[25] C.Ratiu, C.Lazau,P. Sfirloaga,C. Orha,D. Sonea,S. Novaconi,F.Manea, G.Burtica, I.
Grozescu, Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 8 (2009) 237–242.
[26]
C. Ratiu, C. Lazau, C. Orha, P. Sfı̂rloaga, F. Manea, G. Burtica, A. Iovi, I. Grozescu, J.Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 11 (6) (2009) 838–844.[27] C. Ratiu, F. Manea, C. Lazau, I. Grozescu, C. Radovan, J. Schoonman, Desalination
260 (2010) 51–56.[28] A. Lagashetty, V. Havanoor, S. Basavaraja, S.D. Balaji, A. Venkataraman, Sci.
Technol. Adv. Mater. 8 (6) (2007) 484–493.[29] G. Zhu, Y. Li, H. Zhou, J. Liu, W. Yang, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 4354–4356.[30] C.S. Cundy, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 63 (1998) 1699–1723.[31] J.H. Koegler,A. Arafat, H. VanBekkum,J.C. Jansen, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 105 (1997)
2163–2170.[32] Y. Han, H. Ma, S. Qiu, F. Xiao, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 30 (1999) 321–326.[33] S. Mintova, S. Mo, T. Nein, Chem. Mater. 10 (1998) 4030–4036.[34] D. Baek, U.Y. Hwang, K.S . Lee , Y. Shul, K .K. Koo, J . Ind. Eng. Chem. 7 (2001)
241–249.[35] H. Selcuk, M. Bekbolet, Chemosphere 73 (2008) 854–858.[36] H. Wong, K.M. Mok, X.J. Fan, Desalination 210 (2007) 44–51.[37] V.J. Inglezakis, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 281 (2005) 68–79.[38] R.K. Sharma, M.C. Bhatnagar, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 56 (1999) 215–219.[39] A.-X. Lu, N. Lin, X. Li, C.-Y. Tan, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 11 (2004) 124–127.
[40] A. Fujishima, X. Zhang, D.A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep. 63 (2008) 515–582.[41] A.N. Okte, E. Sayinsoz, Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008) 535–543.[42] B. Qi, L.Wu,Y. Zhang, Q. Zeng, J. Zhi, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 345 (2010) 181–186.[43] C.H. Xu, T. Jin, S.H. Jhung, J.S. Hwang, J.S. Chang, F.L. Qiu, S.E. Park, Bull. Korean
Chem. Soc. 25 (5) (2004) 671–686.[44] H. Natori, K. Kobayashi, M. Takahashi, J. Oleo Sci. 58 (7) (2009) 389–394.[45] E.H. DeFaria, A. LemesMarcal, E.JoseNassar, K.JorgeCiuffi,Mater. Res. 10(2007)
413–417.[46] X. Liu, K.K. Iu, J.K. Thomas, Chem. Phys. Lett. 195 (1992) 163–169.[47] Y. Kim, M. Yoon, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 168 (2001) 257–263.[48] F. Li, Y. Jiang,L. Yu, Z.Yang, T.Hou, S.Sun, Appl. Surf. Sci.252 (2005) 1410–1416.[49] C.Orha, F.Manea, C.Ratiu, G.Burtica,A. Iovi, Environ.Eng.Manage. J. 6 (6)(2007)
541–544.[50] A. Bansal, S. Madhavi, T.T.Y. Tan, T.M. Lim, Catal. Today 131 (2008) 250–254.
Fig. 6. Comparison of the degradation and mineralization of 50 mg L 1 humic acid
under UV (i) and VIS (ii) irradiation by photolysis and photocatalysis using Z-Na, Z-
Na-TiO2 and Z-Na-TiO2-Ag catalyst.
C. Lazau et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1916–1921 1921