1 VLSI and Computer Architecture Trends ECE 25 Fall 2012.
-
Upload
malcolm-sanders -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 VLSI and Computer Architecture Trends ECE 25 Fall 2012.
1
VLSI and Computer Architecture Trends
ECE 25Fall 2012
2
A Brief History
• 1958: First integrated circuit– Flip-flop using two transistors– From Texas Instruments
• 2011– Intel 10 Core Xeon
Westmere-EX• 2.6 billion transistors• 32 nm process
Courtesy Texas Instruments
Courtesy Intel
3
Moore’s Law
• Historical growth rate– 2x transistors & clock speeds every 2 years over 50 years– 10x every 6-7 years
• Dramatically more complex algorithms previously not feasible– Dramatically more realistic video games and graphics animation
(e.g. Playstation 4, Xbox 360 Kinect, Nintendo Wii)– 1 Mb/s DSL to 10 Mb/s Cable to 2.4 Gb/s Fiber to Homes– 2G to 3G to 4G wireless communications– MPEG-1 to MPEG-2 to MPEG-4 to H.264 video compression– 480 x 270 (0.13 million pixels) NTSC to 1920x1080 (2 million pixels)
HDTV resolution to 2880x1800 (5 million pixels) Retina Display
4
Standard Cells
NOR-3 XOR-2
5
Standard Cell Layout
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8800(600+ million transistors, about 60+ million gates)
7
NVIDIA Kepler2 GK104 GPU(1536 cores, 3.54 billion transistors)
8
Subwavelength Lithography Challenges
Source: Raul Camposano, 2003
9
NRE Mask Costs
Source: MIT Lincoln Labs, M. Fritze, October 2002
10
ASIC NRE Costs Not Justified for Many Applications
• A complex ASIC will have an NRE Cost of over $40M = $28M (NRE Design Cost) + $12M (NRE Mask Cost)
• Many “ASIC” applications will not have the volume to justify a $40M NRE cost
• e.g. a $30 IC with a 33% margin would require sales of 4M units (x $10 profit/IC) just to recoup $40M NRE Cost
11
Power Density a Key Issue
• Motivated mainly by power limits• Ptotal = Pdynamic + Pleakage
• Pdynamic = ½ a C VDD2 f
• Problem: power (heat dissipation) density has been growing exponentially because clock frequency (f) and transistor count have been doubling every 2 years
12
Power Density a Key Issue
• Had scaling continued at previous pace, by 2005, high speed processors would have power density of nuclear reactor by 2005, a rocket nozzle by 2010, and would become the power density of the sun’s by 2015.
Courtesy: Intel
13
Before Multicore Processors• e.g. Intel Itanium II
– 6-Way Integer Unit < 2% die area– Cache logic > 50% die area
• Most of chip there to keep these 6 Integer Units at “peak” rate
• Main issue is external DRAM latency (50ns) to internal clock (0.25ns) is 200:1
• Increase performance by higher clock frequency and more complex pipelining & speculative execution
INT6
Cache logic
14
Multicore Era
• Multicore era– Operate at lower voltage and lower clock frequency– Simpler processor cores– Increase performance by more cores per chip
• e.g. Intel 10 Core Xeon Westmere-EX– 1.73-2.66 GHz (vs. previous Xeons
at 4 Ghz)1 core
15
Embedded Multicore Processors
• Embedded multicore processors replacing ASICs– Much simpler processor cores, much smaller caches
• e.g. Tilera-GX: 100 processors
16
What Does the Future Look Like?
Corollary of Moore’s law: Number of cores will double every 18 months
‘05 ‘08 ‘11 ‘14
64 256 1024 4096
‘02
16Research
Industry 16 64 256 10244Source: MIT, A. Agrawal, 2009
17
ITRS Roadmap
• Semiconductor Industry Association forecast– Intl. Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors
18
Power Revisited
• Ptotal = Pdynamic + Pleakage
• Pdynamic = ½ a C VDD2 f
• Historically, Pleakage was negligible, Pdynamic dominated.
• Power could be controlled by reducing VDD (which used to be 5V, now about 1V).
• Lowering VDD requires lowering threshold voltage, but Pleakage becomes more dominant, which is why we are not reducing VDD much any more, or very slowly.
19
Classical scalingDevice count S2
Device frequency SDevice power (cap) 1/SDevice power (VDD) 1/S2
Utilization 1
Leakage limited scalingDevice count S2
Device frequency SDevice power (cap) 1/SDevice power (VDD) ~1Utilization 1/S2
The Utilization Wall(Source: S. Swanson, M. Taylor 2010)
• Scaling theory– S =– Exponentially increasing problem!
20
Age of “Dark Silicon”(Source: S. Swanson, M. Taylor 2010)
4 cores @ 3 GHz
4 cores @ 2x3 GHz(12 cores dark)
2x4 cores @ 3 GHz(8 cores dark)(Industry’s Choice)
.…
65 nm 32 nm
.…
Spectrum of tradeoffsbetween # cores and frequency.
e.g.; take 65 nm32 nm; i.e. (s =2)
21
Moving Back to Specialized Silicon?
• “Traditional” Operating System– Provide many “modules” in software that
“applications” call at run-time.– OS modules only “loaded” in memory when used.– Most OS modules unused at any moment.
• Moving OS into silicon?– Power more expensive than area.– Specialized logic can improve energy efficiency 10-1000x.– Possible idea: move power-intensive OS modules into silicon or build
specialized hardware accelerators.– Most of these “silicon modules” would be “dark”: only “lite-up” when called.– In another words, “waste” silicon to save power.
Dark Silicon
Source: S. Swanson, M. Taylor,GreenDroid Project, 2010
22
Questions?