1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

PlanOrganisation Information

IntellectInteraction

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

PlanOrganisation Information

IntellectInteraction

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Network

Learning organisationTeam

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

Team

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

••

• cycle••

•

• tech.

•

•to

•

• tech.

•• for

••

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

tech.

.

Network

LearningorganisationTeam

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

Team

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

••

• cycle••

•

• tech.

•

•to

•

• tech.

•• for

••

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

tech.

.

1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

Organisation

Objectives & Strategy

Statues and bylaws

Local conditions

OrganisationOrganisation

Objectives & StrategyObjectives & Strategy

Statues and bylawsStatues and bylaws

Local conditions Local conditions

1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

"Job" functionalities

Functionalities of a learning organisation

Tools with open access on Internet

Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)

"Job" functionalities"Job" functionalities

Functionalities of a learning organisationFunctionalities of a learning organisation

Tools with open access on Internet

Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)

1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

Transparency

Managemenentby processes and facts

Flexibility

Foresight

TransparencyTransparency

Managemenentby processes and facts

Flexibility Flexibility

ForesightForesight

1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0

2. Structure of the organisation & leadership

0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus

3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation

4. Governance:Management by processes and facts

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

7. Partnership development

6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement

SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07

8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

PlanOrganisation Information

IntellectInteraction

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

PlanOrganisation Information

IntellectInteraction

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Do

Check

Reflect

Plan

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Knowledge* Generic* Contextual

Network

Learning organisationTeam

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

Team

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

••

• cycle••

•

• tech.

•

•to

•

• tech.

•• for

••

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

tech.

.

Network

LearningorganisationTeam

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and

planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants

• Embedded in the structure of the organisations

• Innovative tech. infrastructure

• Rewarding and support forparticipants

• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific

objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of

participants• “light” tech. infrastructure

• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local

control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional

modes of education

Structured

Unstructured

Established Emergent

Team

Community

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

••

• cycle••

•

• tech.

•

•to

•

• tech.

•• for

••

NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios

tech.

.

"Job" functionalities

Functionalities of a learning organisation

Tools with open access on Internet

Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)

"Job" functionalities"Job" functionalities

Functionalities of a learning organisationFunctionalities of a learning organisation

Tools with open access on Internet

Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)

Organisation

Objectives & Strategy

Statues and bylaws

Local conditions

OrganisationOrganisation

Objectives & StrategyObjectives & Strategy

Statues and bylawsStatues and bylaws

Local conditions Local conditions

Transparency

Managemenentby processes and facts

Flexibility

Foresight

TransparencyTransparency

Managemenentby processes and facts

Flexibility Flexibility

ForesightForesight

"Job" functionalities

Functionalities of a learning organisation

Tools with open access on Internet

Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)

1. Collaborative environment of type WEB 2.0

Evolution of the existing structure to a network type structure structure

The bottlenecks disappearDevelopping the participation of all actors

2. Modification of the organisation

Organisation

Objectives & Strategy

Statues and bylaws

Local conditions

0. Invariants to explicite

Explicitation of implicite ways

Know-hows transmission

To promoote and facilite informal education/learning

Attitudes "LifeLong Learning"

Storage & putting at disposal the explicite information

3. Competencies & Know-how

Transparency

Managemenent by processes and facts

Flexibility

Foresight

4. Gouvernance

Criteria & Evaluation

Regulation

Projects

5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation

internal

external

6. Communication

7. Actions for accompagnying the changes - Empowerment

8. .........................

SEOUL 2.0first draft of a generic

model for IFIP 2.0

Seoul AGORA/06.07