1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

17
1 QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see th Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    220
  • download

    3

Transcript of 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

Page 1: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

1

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne

EDF - Manchester meeting

18-19th May 2009

Page 2: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

2

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

The model and Code_Saturne A low-Reynolds (near-wall integration) eddy viscosity model

derived from second moment closure models

No damping functions, no wall functions, less empirical assumptions

Best results on range of test cases, heat transfer and natural convection in particular.

The original model is stiff (requires coupled solver or very small time-step)

Degraded version available in StarCD, Fluent, NUMECA..

Long collaboration Stanford, Delft, Chatou, Manchester (Durbin, Parneix, Hanjalic, Manceau, Uribe) => “several code friendly” versions since 1995.

Present: Reconsider all historical choices with numerical stability and known asymptotic states as principal objectives

Accuracy

Robustness

Stanford 1991

TU-Delft 2004

Manchester 2004

Stanford 1996(Fluent, STAR-CD)

v 2 − f

Page 3: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Starting from the model

ϕ − f

•Uribe (2006), Laurence et al. (2004), available in CS (ITURB=50)

•Same overall good perfomances as the original

•But lack of compliance with asymptotic behaviour requirement.

•No - diffusion for (does not « feel » its B.C.)

• instead of

•Problems reported:

v 2 − f

ν

ϕ

ϕ SATURNE = O(y)

O(y 2)

Near wall overshooting of

ϕHOT COLD

Very low value of k

Very low value of k

Betts Cavity

ϕνϕν 22∇+∇∇+= k

kff

Page 4: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improved code friendly version

ϕ −αElliptic blending

•Unlike , correct near wall behaviour of , hence

•No over prediction of the in the core region, unlike Lien and Durbin model

ϕ − f

v 2

ν t

v 2€

α =1+ L2Δα with

αw = 0•Only a few sub-iterations needed to converge

•More robust (B.C. 0)

Page 5: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Prediction of weak turbulence

Gr /Re2

Case 1: Forced, mixed and natural convection in a heated pipe (You et al. (2003)). Re*=180.

•0.087: Forced/mixed convection

•0.241: Relaminarisation

•0.400: Recovery

Page 6: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Prediction of weak turbulenceCase 2: Combined natural and forced convection (Kasagi

and Nishimura (1997)) Re*=150, Gr=9.6 105

•Upward flow in a vertical channel

•Turbulent anisotropy enhancement in the buoyancy aiding side

Page 7: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improved prediction of by-pass transition

•Near wall adaptation of the equation (near wall terms)

•Usual modelling (also used in the ):

•Launder Sharma model (1974). E term: models the term P3 of the exact equation.

•Howard (2004), application to a skewed channel

•Latest version of the : E term in the equation : more robust

ε

Cε1 =1.4 1+1

30

1

ϕ

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

ϕ − f

ϕ −α

k

ε

∂v 2

∂y

∂U

∂y

∂ 2U

∂y 2 could be added as well.

Page 8: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Results on the T3A flat plate

Page 9: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improvement for High/Low REVariables like U, or YdUdY are in

fact weakly Reynolds dependant

But near wall extra terms are generally Re-

dependant

Page 10: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improvement for High/Low Re

Page 11: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improvement for High/Low Re

Dt=

Cε1P − Cε 2ε

T+ Diffν +ν t

Cε1 =1.4 1+ CA1

1

ϕ

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

2008 version : near wall tem in the Ep. equation

2008 version : near wall tem in the K equation

Page 12: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Improvement for High/Low Re

channel flow

Page 13: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Application on RAE2822 aerofoil

•Collaboration with Jeremy Benton (AIRBUS).

•Prelimiary tests on a turbulent boundary layer ( up to 5368): Cf overprediction reported with the 2008 and the , problem cured with the latest version.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

•Two cases: case 9 (attached) and case 10 (separated).

• model tested with a non-linear stress-strain relationship (Pettersson-Reif, 2006) and in an Algebraic Structure based model (Kassinos)

ϕ −α

•Numerical stability reported to be better than the SST model and the

ϕ − f

Reτ ,δ

ϕ − f

ϕ −α

Page 14: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Results, Cp, case 9 (attached)

COURTESY OF AIRBUS

Page 15: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Results, Cf, upper surface, case 9

COURTESY OF AIRBUS

Page 16: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Results, Cp, case 10 (separated)

COURTESY OF AIRBUS

Page 17: 1 Progress on the v2f model with Code_Saturne EDF - Manchester meeting 18-19th May 2009.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

EDF-Manchester meeting18-19th May 2009

Results, Cf, upper surface, case 10

COURTESY OF AIRBUS