Peronospora destructor (Berk.) Casp. en Berk. Mildiu de la ...
1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion...
![Page 1: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping
H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin
Institute for Fusion Studies
Presented at IAEA Workshop
Oct. 6-8 2003
![Page 2: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
“Signature” for Formation of Phase Space Structure (single resonance)
Explosive response leads to formation of phase space structure
Berk, Breizman, Pekker
![Page 3: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Simulation:N. Petviashvili
![Page 4: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
“BGK” relation•Basic scaling obtained even by neglecting effect of directfield amplitude •Examine dispersion with a structure in distribution function(e.g. hole)
€
0 = ε(ω,k) =1 +ω p
2
kdv∫
∂f (v)
∂vω − kv
≈2(ω −ω p )
ω p
+ω p
2
kdv∫
∂[ f (v) − f0(v)]
∂vω − kv
0 ≈ω − ωp
ω(1−
γ L
ωb
); thus γ L ≈ ωb
v
€
ωb
k
€
f (v) - f0 (ω0
k)
![Page 5: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Power Transfer by Interchange in Phase Space
Ideal Collisionless Result
€
ωb =163π 2 γ L ; δω =
π
2 2
γ d
γ L
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
1/ 2
ωb3/2t1/2
![Page 6: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
TAE modes in MAST
(Culham Laboratory, U. K. courtesy of Mikhail Gryaznevich)
IFS numerical simulation Petviashvili [Phys. Lett. (1998)]
L linear growth without dissipation; for spontaneous hole formation; L d.
ω =(ekE/m)1/2 0.5L
With geometry and energeticparticle distribution known internalperturbing fields can be inferred
Predicted Nonlinear Frequency Sweeping Observed in Experiment
![Page 7: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Study of Adiabatic EquationsStudy begins by creating a fully formed phase spacestructure (hole) at an initial time, and propagate solutionusing equations below.
€
∂f (J, t)
∂t−ν eff
3 ∂
∂J(∂J
∂EJ
∂f (J, t)
∂J) = 0 (in trapped particle region),
δωωb2 =
4γ L
π 2 ∂f0(ω0)
∂ω
dE[ f (J (E), t) − f0−ω b2
ω b2
∫ (ω0 +δω)]dφ
[2(E + ωb2 cosφ)]1/ 20
φ max
∫
γ dωb4 = −
γ L
dδω
dt
π∂f0 (ω0 )
∂ω
dJ[ f (J, t) − f00
Jsep
∫ (ω0 + δω)]
J =dϕ
2π∫ p =2
πdφ
0
φmac
∫ [2(E(J) +ωb2 cosφ)]1/2, E ≡ energy in local wave frame
Note: If ν eff = 0, ωb(δω, t) depends only on δω(t)
![Page 8: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Results of Fokker-Planck Code
sweeping terminates why?
sweeping goes tocompletion
€
δ ˆ ω ≡δων eff
3/ 2
ωbi(γ dγ L2 )1/ 2
![Page 9: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Normalized Adiabatic Equation, eff=0Dimensionless variables:
€
δωδω0
→ Ω, ωbi → 1, ωb → Ωb , Jsep → Ω b1, J → Ωb I, f (J) → GT (Ωb I)
€
Ωb =1− 1
ΩdIGT(IΩb)Q(I)
0
1
∫
I = (2 2)−1 dφ[E'+cosφ]1/20ϕ max
∫ , Q(I) =3 dφcosφ /[E'+cosφ]1/2
0ϕ max
∫dφ /[E' +cosφ]1/2
0ϕ max
∫
“BGK” Equation
Take derivative with with respect to Ωb
![Page 10: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Propagation Equation;Difficulties
€
dΩdΩb
=ΩHT (Ω,Ω b)
1− Ω b
€
HT(Ω,Ω b ) = 1+ (ΩΩ b )−1 dIIdGT (IΩ b )
dI0
1
∫ Q (I)
Problems with propagation
a. HT (Ω Ω ) = 0, termination of frequency sweepingb. 1- Ω = HT (Ω Ω ) = 0; singularity in equation, unique solution cannot be obtained
![Page 11: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Instability AnalysisBasic equation for evolving potential in frame of nonlinear wave (extrinsic wave damping neglected), 1= P(t) cos x + Q(t) sinx; Ω Ω Ω
€
dQ
dt+ ΔΩP = −β dΓf cos(x)∫
dP
dt− ΔΩQ = β dΓ f sin(x∫ )
f satisfies Vlasov equation for:
€
f ( x,v, t) = F (E ) +δ ˆ f (E, x)exp(−iω t)
Spatial solutions are nearly even or odd
![Page 12: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Analysis (continued)
F(J)-F0(Ω ) ΩGT
Ω ΩJ
Find equilibrium in wave frame:
€
E = (v − Ω2 ) / 2 − Ω b2 cos x, J = ΩbI ; solve for Ωb = 1− dIGT (IΩb )Q(I)
0
1
∫ Linearization:
€
φ=[δP cos x + δQsin x]exp(−iω t); lowest order δQ = 0 + ϑ (Ω b / ΔΩ)
Perturbed distribution function
€
δf (E, x) = −∂GT (E )
∂EδPe −iωt[cosx − iω dt'e− iωt ' cos x(t ')( )
−∞
0
∫ ]
cos x(t)( ) = < cos x >2n cos4πn
T (E )t −τ (E, x)( )
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥
n=1
∞
∑
![Page 13: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Dispersion Relation
€
HT'
2≡ 1− β dE
∂GT (E)∂E−Ω b
2
Ω b2
∫ T (E )[< cos2 x > 0 − < cos x > 02]
= 2β dE-Ω b
2
Ω b2
∫n=1
∞
∑∂GT (E)
∂ET (E )
ω2 < cos x > 2n2
2n2π
T (E) ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟2
−ω 2
ω <<Ω b ⏐ → ⏐ ⏐ σΩ2, σ > 0
Identity
€
Instability Arises if H T' < 0
€
HT' = HT =1 +
1Ωb
dIIdG(Ωb I)
dI0
1
∫ Q(I)
Consequence: Adiabatic SweepingTheory “knows”about linear instability criterion for both types of Breakdown: (a)sweeping termination (b) singular point
Onset of instability necessitates non-adiabatic response
![Page 14: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
![Page 15: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Comparison of Adiabatic Code and Simulation
€
Ωb0 =1.16, γ L
ωbi
=1.85, γ d
ωbi
= .093, I* = 0.8, ΔΩ
ωbi
= 9.26
(passing particle distribution flat)
![Page 16: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Evolution of Instability
Trapping frequency,ωb ωbiSpectral Evolution, δωL
slope in passing particle distribution
Indication that Instability Leads to Sideband Formation
![Page 17: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Side Band Formation During Sweeping
![Page 18: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Summary1. Ideal model of evolution of phase structure has beentreated more realistically based on either particle adiabatic invariance or Fokker-Planck equation 2. Under many conditions the adiabatic evolution of frequency sweeping reaches a point where the theory cannot make a prediction (termination of frequency sweeping or singularity in evolution equation)3. Linear analysis predicts that these “troublesome” points are just where non-adiabatic instability arises4. Hole structure recovers after instability; frequency sweeping continues at somewhat reduced sweeping rate5. Indication the instability causes generation of side-bandstructures
![Page 19: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Finis
![Page 20: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Linear Dispersion Relation
€
HT(Ω,Ω b ) / 2 = −σ γ 2, if γ 2 << Ω b2 , σ > 0
Linear Instability if HT < 0
Hence HT(ΩΩb) =0 is marginal stability conditionof linear theory. Adiabatic theory breakdown due tofrequency sweeping termination, or reaching singularpoint is indicative of instability. Then there is an intrinsic non-adiabatic response of this particle-wave system
![Page 21: 1 Phase Space Instability with Frequency Sweeping H. L. Berk and D. Yu. Eremin Institute for Fusion Studies Presented at IAEA Workshop Oct. 6-8 2003.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110323/56649d7e5503460f94a610f4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21