1 ESE Science Review [Meeting on Weather Forecasting] Eric A. Smith; NASA/Goddard Space Flight...

21
1 ESE Science Review [Meeting on Weather Forecasting] Eric A. Smith; NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 [301-286-5770; 301-286-1626; [email protected]] July 20, 2001; NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC GPM A Limited Perspective on Weather Forecast Science Problems Confronting GPM

Transcript of 1 ESE Science Review [Meeting on Weather Forecasting] Eric A. Smith; NASA/Goddard Space Flight...

1

• ESE Science Review[Meeting on Weather Forecasting]

• Eric A. Smith; NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771[301-286-5770; 301-286-1626; [email protected]]

• July 20, 2001; NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC

GPM

A Limited Perspective on Weather ForecastScience Problems Confronting GPM

2

TRMM 1-day coverage

SSM/I Era

TRMM Era

EOS Era

GPM Era

3

Projected Satellite Data Streams for GPM Erafrom Passive Microwave Radiometers & Precipitation Radars

[at left are either actual (bold) or orthodox (paren) nodal crossing times (DN or AN) or non-sun-synch labels ]

CY 99-18 99 00 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1803 08 09 1001 02 0704 05 06

AMSR-E CMR-1

F20

NPOESS C1

F18 SSM/I SSMIS CMIS

SSM/I SSMIS CMIS MSU AMSU-A

AMSR AMSR-FO

GPM-1 (e.g., N-GPM)

GPM Core (65∞ inc)

ADEOS II

PR/TMI DPR/ATMI

TRMM (35∞ inc)

DMSP F13DMSP F16

NPOESS C3

DMSP F15DMSP F17 F19

NPOESS LITE-CMIS

AQUA

GPM-3 (e.g., E-GPM)

GPM-2 (e.g., I-GPM)

GCOM-B1

MEGHA-TROPIQUES (22∞ inc)MADRAS

GPM-5 (partner needed)

GPM-4 (partner needed)

CMR-2

CMR-3

CMR -4

CMR-5

FY-3TBD

0530DN0530DN

0130DN

NSS

NSS

1030DN

TBD

NOAA-MNOAA-K CMIS MSU AMSU-A

0730DN

NOAA-L NOAA-N

Potential Gap

KEY carries preferred PMW frequencies carries alternate PMW frequenciesGPM-1,-2,-3,-4,-5 are dedicated GPM drone

satellites (e.g., N-GPM, I-GPM, E-GPM)

NOAA-J

(1430AN)

(1730AN)

(2030AN)

(2330AN)

(1030DN)

(0230DN)

NPOESS C2

NOAA-N’

Continuous Geosynchronous Satellite Coverage by GOES E/W, METEOSAT/MSG, & GMS

(0830DN)

(0530DN)

NPP-ATMS

Replacement Era

Replacement Era

Replacement Era

Replacement Era

Replacement Era

Replacement Era

0915DN0830DN

4

GPM Mission Reference Concept

GPM Advanced Study Formulation

5

GPM Science Agenda

6

GPM Constellation Orbit Optimization

7

GPM Mission is Being Formulatedwithin Context of GWEC

with Main Science Objectives Focusing On:_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Improving flood hazard & basin-scale hydrological predictions -- through more frequent sampling and full-earth coverage of precipitation measurements

Improving climate prediction -- through better understanding of water cycling and accompanying accelerations -- decelerations of atmospheric and surface branches of water cycle

Improving weather forecasting -- through better methods of rainfall data assimilation and more accurate & precise measurements of instantaneous rainrates

8

GPM Era Coverage GPM Era Coverage with 3 Inclined

GPM Core, DMSP-F18, DMSP-F19, GCOM-B1, Megha-Tropiques,& Three 600-km DronesDrones @ 34∞, 84∞, 90∞

3-hour Ground Trace

9

Tropical CyclonePrediction

Conundrum

10

TRMM Impact on Mesoscale Simulation of Super Typhoon Paka

PAKA (8.9∞N, 161.8∞E)[13 Dec-1997 / 0911 UTC]

SSM/I 85 GHz TB

GEOS with TRMM RR & TPW + Bogus Vortex(adjoint-based 4-D VAR)[13 Dec-1997/ 0900 UTC]

RR(mm/3hr); LP; 850 hPa Wind

GEOS without TRMM [13 Dec-1997 / 0900 UTC]

RR(mm/3hr); SLP; 850 hPa Wind

GEOS with TRMM RR & TPW[13 Dec-1997 / 0900 UTC]

RR(mm/3hr); SLP; 850 hPa Wind

[Pu & Tao, 2001: GSFC]

33 hr forecasts using PSU/NCAR MM5 model at 5-km horizontal resolution testing different initial conditions for time 12 Dec-1997 / 0000 UTC

11

Retrieval of RainrateVertical Structure

Conundrum

12

Data Assimilation Experiments Based on Retrieved SSM/I &

TRMM Rainrates

Have Not Been Particularly Sensitive to Intensity of

Rainrates

Nor Have Made Use of Vertical Profile of

Rainrate or Latent Heating

13

Cloud-PrecipitationContinuumConundrum

14

Impact of Rainfall Assimilation on GEOS Analysis

Assimilationwith

TMI+SSM/Irainfall & TPW

Precipitation

verified against

GPCP____________________

TPW

verified against

Wentz____________________

OLR

verified against

CERES/TRMM____________________

IR Cld Forcing

verified against

CERES/TRMM

Assimilation of satellite-based rainfall data improves clouds & TOA radiation,Assimilation of satellite-based rainfall data improves clouds & TOA radiation,

plus reduces state-dependent systematic errors in GEOS analysisplus reduces state-dependent systematic errors in GEOS analysis

OLR Error Std Dev OLR Error Std Dev

verified against CERESverified against CERES

for 1-, 5-, & 30-dayfor 1-, 5-, & 30-day

Averaging PeriodsAveraging Periods

Control Run

15

Physical InitializationUnder

Complex Convective Parameterization Scheme

Conundrum

16

Reverse Schemes for Convective Parameterizations

Carrying Updrafts & Downdrafts

Do Not Yield Unique Solutionfor Adjusting (nudging)

Water Vapor Field

Once Model-ObservationSurface Rainfall Departures

Are Determined

17

Control variables at time t0

Control variablesat time t

Surface rainrate

Forecast Model

(PHYSICS)

Interpolation at observation

location

MOIST PHYSICS(convection+

grid scalecondensation)

Increments ofcontrol variables

at time t0

Incrementsof control variables

at time t

Surface rainrate

departure

Adjoint ofForecast

Model(PHYSICS)

Adjoint of spatial

interpolation

Adjoint of MOIST PHYSICS

4DVAR Rainfall Data Assimilation

Forward

Backward

18

GPM Validation StrategyTropical Continental

Confidencesanity checks

GPMSatellite

DataStreams

ContinuousSynthesis

∑ error variances∑ precip trends

Calibration

Mid-Lat Continental

Tropical Oceanic

Extratropical Baroclinic

High Latitude Snow

ResearchQuality

Data

Algorith

mIm

provem

ents

Research∑ cloud macrophysics∑ cloud microphysics∑ cloud-radiation modeling

FC Data

Supersite Products

II. GPM Supersites Basic Rainfall Validationhi-lo res gauge/disdrometer networkspolarametric Radar system

Accurate Physical Validationscientists & technicians staffdata acquisition & computer facilitymeteorological sensor systemupfacing multifreq radiometer systemDo/DSD variability/vertical structureconvective/stratiform partitioning

III. GPM Field Campaigns GPM Supersitescloud/ precip/radiation/dynamics processes GPM Alg Problem/Bias Regionstargeted to specific problems

I. Basic Rainfall Validation∑ Raingauges/Radars new/existing gauge networks new/existing radar networks

19

Focused Field Campaigns

Meteorology-Microphysics Aircraft

GPM Core Satellite Radar/Radiometer

Prototype Instruments

Piloted

UAVs

150 km

Retrieval Error

Synthesis

AlgorithmImprovement

Guidance

Validation Analysis

Triple Gage Site(3 economy scientific gages)

Single Disdrometer/Triple Gage Site(1 high quality-Large Aperture/2 economy scientific gages)

150 km

100-Gage Site Lo-Res DomainCentered on Multi-parm-Radar

5 km

50-Gage Site Hi-Res DomainCenter-Displaced with

∑ Uplooking Radiom/Radar System[10.7,19,22,37,85,150 GHz/14,35,95 GHz]∑ 915 or 2835 MHz Doppler Radar Profiler

∑  Portable X-band Radar

Data Acquisition-Analysis Facility

DELIVERY

Legend

Multiparameter Radar

Uplk Radiom/Radar940 MHz Profiler

Port X-band Radar

Meteorological Tower

Supersite Template

Site Scientist (3)

Technician (3)

20

ECMWF Requirements for GPMfrom Rainfall Assimilation Experience

Spatial Resolution:• Well-defined rain product spatial resolution (ECMWF-model

will be going to 15 km forecast / 30 km assimilation resolutions)Sampling:• Prefer “less often but more accurate”Error Considerations:• Quantification of error in rain detection • Quantification of retrieval errors/time-space biases• Removal of inter-satellite retrieval errors• Assessment of errors due to spatial/temporal sampling mismatch

Plans at ECMWF:• Evaluation of rainrate vs simplified radiance assimilation• Improved estimation of humidity profile forecast errors

21

Final Comments

Currently, NASA is only organization with wherewithal to bring online global observing system of precipitation & closely related data assimilation variables which could significantly improve weather forecasting through improvements in water-related components of numerical prediction models & associated data assimilation schemes.

However:

Better observations by themselves do not solve or resolve all standing problems in predictive modeling and thus ESE plan must resolve which groups and through what mechanisms model & data assimilation technique development will proceed to take advantage of current and future space measurements NASA intends to provide.