1 EFFECT OF HARMONICS ON DISTRIBUTED GENERATION Dr. Elham Makram Department of Electrical and...
-
Upload
alfred-long -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 EFFECT OF HARMONICS ON DISTRIBUTED GENERATION Dr. Elham Makram Department of Electrical and...
1
EFFECT OF HARMONICS ON DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Dr. Elham MakramDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Clemson UniversityClemson, South Carolina 29634-0915
Clemson University Electric Power Research AssociationDG Conference, Clemson SC
March 14, 2002
2
Outline• Overview of the effect of nonlinear loads on Power System Harmonics
• Effect of converter drive and arc furnace
• Effect of harmonics on power factor
• Effect of capacitor placement on harmonics
• Impact of unbalance on harmonics
• Need for accurate modeling for harmonic analysis
• Comparison of Time domain and Frequency domain methods
• Performance analysis of models for nonlinear loads
• Change in the scenario due to addition of Distributed Generation
• DG devices and corresponding systems
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
3
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
The presence of a 6-pulse converter on the power system causes harmonic currents to flow through the system. Voltage distortion is negligible
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Cu
rren
t M
agn
itu
de
(%)
TRANS5_49 LINE3 LINE2 LINE1
Line Number
5th
7th
11th
13th
17th
19th
23rd
25th
Arc furnace produces voltage distortion and current distortion; the distortion in voltage being much higher than that in current. As such the AF by itself is more harmful to other customer loads than the converter drive.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Vol
tage
Mag
nit
ud
e (%
)
Bus 12 Bus 11
Bus Numbers
5
7
11
13
17
19
23
25
Effect Of converter drive and arc furnace
4
A nonlinear load at a bus causes the power factor at that bus and at buses close to it to drop.
Placement of power factor improvement capacitors at buses close to the nonlinear load bus worsens the power at the nonlinear load bus, and also at buses close to it.
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
Pow
er F
acto
r
Bus 12 Bus 11 Bus 8 Bus 4Buses
Linear LoadAF Load
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Pow
er F
acto
r
Bus 12 Bus 11 Bus 8 Bus 4Buses
Without capacitorWith capacitor
Effect Of Harmonics on Power Factor
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
5
The presence of capacitor banks increases the current and voltage distortion at the nonlinear load bus and the buses close to it.
Effect of Capacitor placement on Harmonics
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08-200
-100
0
100
200
Mag
nitu
de in
Am
pere
Time (seconds)0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
Mag
nitu
de in
Vol
t
Time (seconds)
0 5 10 15 20 250
100
200
300
400
Harmonic Order0 5 10 15 20 25
0
500
1000
1500
Harmonic Order
Current Voltage
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08-400
-200
0
200
400
Mag
nitu
de in
Am
pere
Time (seconds)0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
Mag
nitu
de in
Vol
t
Time (seconds)
0 5 10 15 20 250
50
100
150
200
250
Harmonic Order0 5 10 15 20 25
0
500
1000
1500
Harmonic Order
Current Voltage
Before capacitor placement After capacitor placement
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
6Impact of unbalance on harmonics
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08-400
-200
0
200
400
Mag
nitu
de in
Am
pere
s
Time (seconds)
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
Harmonic Order
Mag
nitu
de in
per
cent
0.9
0.91
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.97
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Degree of Unbalance
Pow
er F
acto
r
Nonlinear ModelLinear Model
0.9
0.91
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.97
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Degree of Unbalance
Pow
er F
acto
r
Nonlinear ModelLinear Model
In addition to characteristic (6n1) harmonics, unbalance introduces uncharacteristic (triplen) harmonics
Unbalance adversely affects the power factor. Comparison is shown between the results obtained using a linear model and those obtained using a nonlinear model for the arc furnace
7Impact of unbalance on harmonics
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
• Degree of unbalance affects harmonics differently, i.e. with an increase in the degree of unbalance, the non-characteristic harmonics increase, whereas the characteristic harmonics show a decrease.
• The symmetrical component decomposition of individual harmonics helps to give an insight into the behavior of harmonics under varying degrees of unbalance.
• Unbalance adversely affects the power factor, although if the unbalance is within practical limits, the drop in the power factor is not very significant.
• Unbalanced conditions render certain models for nonlinear loads, to be inadequate for use.
8
Frequency domain method of harmonic analysis gives pessimistic results, and is not equipped to accurately solve for certain types of harmonic analysis problems.
The DC side load also determines the amount of harmonics injected into the system. There is no provision in the frequency domain method to model this.
Comparison of Time domain and Frequency domain methods
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Cu
rren
t in
lin
e 3
(% m
agn
itu
de)
5 7 11 13 17 19 23 25
Harmonic Number
Time
Frequency
0
5
10
15
20
25
Cu
rren
t M
agn
itu
de
(%)
5 7 11 13 17 19 23 25Harmonic Number
DC load1/4 DC load1/8 DC load
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
9Performance analysis of models for nonlinear loads
400
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Current (kA)
Vol
tage
(V
)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Current (kA) V
olta
ge (
V)
Using a Linear model
Voltage-Current characteristics for the arc furnace
Using a Nonlinear model
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
Preserving the nonlinearity of the problem yields a more accurate solution.
10
Traditional Distribution
System
NONLINEAR LOADS
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Original Picture
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
11Change in the scenario due to addition of Distributed Generation
• System would no longer be radial
• DG devices would have power conditioning sub-systems, which would inject harmonics into the distribution system as well
• This situation would be different from the case of multiple nonlinear loads
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
Traditional Distribution
System
NONLINEAR LOADS
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
SOURCES
INTERCONNECTION DEVICES
Traditional Distribution
System
NONLINEAR LOADS
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
SOURCES
INTERCONNECTION DEVICES
12DG devices and corresponding systems to be considered
Photovoltaics
Microturbines
Wind Energy
Inverters
Converter – Inverter pair
Induction generator – Converter - Inverter pair
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
DG device Interconnection Type of system
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
13
A Typical Residential PV System
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
Preliminary results: Impact of a PV System
14Modeling of Residential System
Residential system is modeled by considering four typical houses. Loads considered in each house are:
Linear Loads (assumed):
Incandescent light
Refrigerator load
Nonlinear Loads:
Compact Fluorescent Lights
Television Set
Heat pump
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
15
Case 1:
DG as a standalone unit supplying residential loads
Case 2:
Residential system loads fed by the distribution system only
Case 3:Residential loads fed by PV and the distribution system
Cases Studied
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
16Results for Case 1
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
4.82 4.84 4.86 4.88 4.9-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Time(seconds)
Mag
nitu
de (
volt
s)Load voltage waveform
4.83 4.85 4.87 4.89-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Time(seconds)
Mag
nitu
de (
ampe
res)
Load current waveform
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
30
Harmonic Order
Mag
nitu
de (
%)
Frequency Spectrum
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
Harmonic Order
Mag
nitu
de (
%)
Frequency Spectrum
Voltage and current at the load bus
17Results for Cases 2 & 3
HOUSE1 HOUSE2 HOUSE4HOUSE3
12.47/4.16 4.16/0.208
1- LOADS
DG
SUBSTATION
3- LOADS
RESIDENTIAL LOADSTRANSFORMER
LINE REACTOR
COMPARISON OF LOAD VOLTAGE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mag
nitu
de (
%)
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Harmonic order
Case 2Case 3
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
18Results for Cases 2 & 3
HOUSE1 HOUSE2 HOUSE4HOUSE3
12.47/4.16 4.16/0.208
1- LOADS
DG
SUBSTATION
3- LOADS
RESIDENTIAL LOADSTRANSFORMER
LINE REACTOR
COMPARISON OF LOAD CURRENT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Mag
nitu
de (
%)
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Harmonic order
Case 2Case 3
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
19Conclusions
• Harmonics produced on the load side by the PV system were not significant compared to the high current distortion caused due to the household nonlinear loads.
• Harmonic distortion injected into the distribution system decreased after connecting the PV system
• The harmonics picture may change than the way it appears now when number of PV systems connected to the distribution system increase.
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002
20
Work In Progress
• Modeling of other types of DG – Micro turbines, Wind Energy
• Effect of DG on harmonic distortion in case of commercial and industrial systems
• Impact of varying degrees of penetration of DG
• Combined effect of different combinations of DG devices
DG Conference Clemson University March 13-15, 2002