1 Biocentrism and Conservationism Conservationism: Merv Wilkinson and Wildwood Forest. Harvesting...
-
Upload
allen-angel -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Biocentrism and Conservationism Conservationism: Merv Wilkinson and Wildwood Forest. Harvesting...
1
Biocentrism and Conservationism
Conservationism: Merv Wilkinson and Wildwood Forest.
Harvesting the forest so there is more than enough, preservation of diversity also!
Attitude of reverence and Schweitzer.
2
Biocentrism
“the view that living things as such can benefit from and be harmed by human actions…”
Intrinsic value
Do harm and benefit entail rights for such things?
Opposes anthropocentrism!
Is it possible or realistic to universalize reverence and this perspective?
3
Christopher Stone
A frightening or laughable proposal that trees, forests, oceans, rivers and other natural objects have legal rights?
Historical precedence.
Rights based on fact of being harmed by or benefited from human action!
Does not imply that they have equal rights, all the same rights as humans have.
Legally recognized worth and dignity.
4
Stone and common law
Rivers, lakes and forests are rightless, void of rights.
No way to challenge polluters except by reference to property.
System protects property rights of humans or their economic interests.
Yet, it makes sense to speak of legal damage to a natural object. Why? COSTS OF DAMAGE!
5
Current Law
Natural objects lack legal standing, unique damages to them do not count and they are not the beneficiaries of rewards.
Against conservationism!
Why these living things can have standing, if we wish to grant standing:Like legal incompetents, they can makes claims in
court.Rights = ability to make claims Guardianship
6
Towards Legal Standing
Natural objects become a party to an injunctive settlement, a beneficiary of monetary rewards from recognized harm.
Proposes trust fund instead of ending pollution.
Allows us to cover homocentric costs among other things.
A radical new conception of man’s relationship to nature.
7The role of attitude and consciousness
How realistic is it to have such a radical change?
Hegel and the will justifying private property.
The absolute right of appropriation over all things!
Curing the view that nature is a collection of useful senseless objects! Will love do it?
Against mastery, control, does this include “knowledge”?
8
The need for a new myth
Freeing ourselves from our supportive illusions!
Does this imply biocentric equality?
A myth to fit our growing body of knowledge of geophysics, biology and the cosmos!
Is the modern outlook to blame? What is it?
The separation between the normative and the natural, facts and values.
Anthropocentrism: natural things have no value independent of our interests and values.
9
Paul Taylor
An outlook! 4 assertions.
How important are outlooks, ideologies and perspectives in solving environmental problems?
Related to Singer’s speciesism.
Holism
Teleological centers of life
10
Biocentric Egalitarianism
IV: Rejection of human superiority.
Is this a logically consistent position?
Would it be overriding? That is, could it really replace the existing and dominant perspective?
Is the rejection itself anthropocentric?
Dehumanization!
Merv Wilkenson (p. 71) and the alternative.
11Ecocentrism and Deep
Ecology
Ecocentrism: idea that ecosystem is the primary moral concern.
What is an ecosystem? Is it not a human concept to describe the observation of the energy transfers we find in nature?
It is not a relatively closed system. It is open, but has internal and external components. See Wiki! An energy system, the sun.
An ecosystem is a community of living organisms (plants, animals and microbes) in conjunction with the nonliving components of their environment (things like air, water and mineral soil), interacting as a system.[2]
12
The Land Ethic: Leopold
Extension of ethics is “actually a process in ecological evolution.” 80
An ethic: “a limitation on the freedom of action in the struggle for existence.” 80
Actually, a replacement of “original freedom for all competition” by cooperative mechanisms, an ethical content.
Consistent?
A brief history of ethics
13The Land Ethic: An
Evolutionary Possibility
He regards it as a ecological necessity.
The single premise of all ethical systems: individual is member of a community of interdependent parts.
Really? Implies integration, but what about racism, classism, inequality, discrimination, segregation?
Land Ethic: simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soil, water, plants and animals.
Land Ethic cannot prevent existing uses of “natural resources.” (81)
14
An Ethic of Respect
Changes role for homo sapiens, from conqueror to plain member
The Judao-Christian Tradition: Land given to humans to be fruitful and multiply
State of current conservationism: encourages only enlightened self-interest
The modern farmer: anxious for quick success
The profit motive?
15
The Land Ethic
Starting point: a change in ethics to include obligations to the land, to the ecosystem as a whole
Problem is rooted in our attitudes and motives: loyalties, convictions, mind frames
The economic motive; problem is that most members of the land community have no economic value
What is this due to?
Song birds, a good example; economic reason to valid protection
16
The Land Ethic
Hence, it opposes the economic valuation of members of the biotic community in favor of a limit on our actions based on inclusion into this community
Preservationism– the view that certain species have a right to exist and even thrive within reason
Ecosystem “needs” these species (beech tree for soil fertility) and hence we should preserve them
Does need entail obligation?
17
Land Ethic
The existing government forumula: relegate conservation of such things and systems to government
Parks, refuges, monuments
The assumed lack of profit has been wrong
Does this open the economic route?
No disapproval of government trustee of land
But goal is assigning more obligations to the private landowner
18
Land Ethic
Private property and landownersThey show no sign of voluntarily using
conservationismLack of ethical obligations to the land, or only a
personal ethicNo system of conservationism based on economic self
interest will include all elements of the land community
False assumption: economic parts can function without the non-economic ones
Only visible remedy: an ethical obligation on part of private landowners
19
Land Ethic: The Land PyramidA description of dependency of life on the soil.
Food chains, etc.
Crucial aspect is that it is open and changeable but knowing how ecology works is vital for knowing whether are actions are good or not
Some biota are relatively robust and resistant, Western Europe, some are not, South America
Changes do not necessarily divert the flower of energy
In general, the more violent or rapid the change, the worse
20
Land Ethic
Use of land and violence. How do we determine the degree of violence?
Formulating an ethic: ecological conscience and aim of land health Health as capacity for self-renewal p.88: keylog of the land ethic : “ quit thinking about
decent land use as solely an economic problem. Examine each question in terms of what is ethically and aesthetically right...”
“A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise.” 88
20
21
Williston’s interpretationa and b on page 90
a) not interfering in such balanced systems to the degree that damages the energy flow
b) rectifying whatever damage to such systems our actions have already produced by restoring them to something resembling their pre-interference state
Not prevented from changing them: feeding the Moose?
Preservationism: maintaining integrity of ecosystems. Preservation against destructive human activity.
Applied to national parks, Banfff, example of elk and wolves
21
22
Applying Land Ethic
Is this case an instance of the violence of mere human presence?
Is human population such violence? Evolution!
22
23
Deep Ecology
Some basics:A radical movement seeking change at a deep,
fundamental levelEmerged out of plenty and prosperity, the higher or
middle class, the richest industrial societiesEnvironmentalism as a privileged movement!The Concept: going deeper than ecology?Transcends limits of any particular scienceA philosophy, hence an attempt at an environmental
philosophy/ethic
23
24
Deep Ecology
A movement, a social/political one follows from the philosophy
Sharing of some of the principles but not a uniform movement
Naess’ Ecosophy T! Implies individuality of such a philosophy. Personal? Individuated, not homogeneous
Attempt to formulate a wisdom not a knowledge or science from the movement
24
25Deep Ecology and Self
Realization
Which Self?
Idea of broad, enlarged Self
Based on principle of identification in a positive sense
Inspired by Eastern thought--Buddhism
Process of ever-widening “identification”
A reply to alienation, social?
25
26Deep Ecology and
Identification
Identification is spontaneous and the deeper it goes the more the difference and separation of ego and alter (other) dissolves
Does not eliminate individual differences or conflicts
Vital interests! Growing, flourishing, etc.
Generates problems of priority
26
27
Identification
Fellow feeling, empathy
The Self is one, is in all things
Higher level of unity or oneness
Opposes alienation, which can engender hatred of self, against self
Non-reciprocal, does not impose obligations on the other
The idea of Atman (yogi, enlightened one, etc)
Western tradition-- Spinoza and acting out of the self
27
28
D.E. and Identification
Process of further widening of Self through self-seeking, knowing the self
Results in understanding of how all things and beings are interconnected, sharing in “Self.”
Should increase action, activity for the purpose of enlarging the self
No need for altruism, but maturity
Maturation as realization of potential, self-realization
Voluntary simplicity and joy
28
29
Widening of Self
Widening and increasing perspectives, deepening experiences, higher levels of activeness
Opposes Kantian duty
Acting out of identification of suffering!
Suffering most potent source of identification
Beautifying actions
Romanticism and idea of “man apart”
29
30
Intrinsic Value and Flourishing
Raising of consciousness, Rachel Carlson and her work “Silent Spring.”
Self awareness.
More appreciation of non-industrialized cultures and minorities, too much bordering on adulation?
Criticism of progress in industrial society
The call for intrinsic value related to these two
Identification: Every living being has a right to life!
30
31Deep Ecology and Attitude of
Love
Love as capable of creating restraints!
31