08-08-19 Judge Jacqueline Connor Conduct at the Criminal Division and the Rampart scandal...

8/9/2019 08-08-19 Judge Jacqueline Connor Conduct at the Criminal Division and the Rampart scandal (1998-2000)- Anonymous Account by a Criminal Defense Attorney s

1/4


2/4

IeGimy uCmywtLbwsDwAih

ICTmih .-"a

TCmimmmiwwtmwfm\VwVc

Pand that required their acquittal despite the jury's finding them guilty. Connor'sre\'ersirg the guilty verdict ended the Ramparts Prosecution of dirty cops.

\Vhcn YOU are fighting a stacked deck and they are dealing from the bottom of. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I "---the deck. you might be better suited to take your evidence offraud to the State AttomeyGeneral. He has sued Countrywide alreadY. I doubt he will have any interest in your.; -' ...-tail of \"oe \\ith \Vest District. His interest will be limited to facts of fraud. He will

ha\\: no inlerest in your opinion.One of the hardest things for non-attomeys to understand is the distinction

between hlcts and opinions. Your opinion about someone' s motives may be lO()(/,ocOITecL but the A.G. can only act on the basis of facts . . e.g. The loan documents.letters and e-mails. The e-mail is a fact but it may contain opinions and the opinion isworthless to the A.G. You may be in the sad situation where your opinions areaccurat


3/4

CTmwioetwTvc

;wC w

-

ImhwCcm

PYou ha\'e something else working against you - your passion, People in thelegal field shun people who fee I passionate, 1 cannot explain why this is so - it is aquirk oftht:' American psyche. The angrier and 1110re passionate you are. the less andless anyone in the legal filed \vill want to have anything to do \vit11 you.

I recently represented an Israeli who had been telTibly cheated and who was1.000 per cent innocent ofany wrong doing. One ofmy hardest tasks was keeping himquiet. I Ie could not believe that people did not want to hear his story. They do not-not in the American legal system, I cannot explain \\'hy - that is just the way it is,Almost e\'t::ry client does hTfeat hanll to his case when he/she takes the stand.

There are an infinite number of ways that court call organize themselves. Ya l lh a \ ' t ~ to leam to distinguish between its arbitrary organization \\'hich you do not like andcOlTuption in the judicial system. Because you have had a couple attomeys. it appearsthat you lll.ly not be listening to them when they try to explain certain features of thesystem 1,0 you. For example. some orders may be dated I lUllC pO l ' t li ll C \vithout beingCOlTUpt. To you that may look like illegal back-dating. but within the rules ofthe court.it is nOl, bLick-dating. It can be holding an order in abeyance until a certain eventoccurs. I lla\'e no comment on the back-dated orders in your case. except to point outthe need to distinguish between arbitrary rules whicll are 110t COlTUpt and a COlTUptviolation of court rules.

AlsCI I believe that shou'ld no confuse tIle vile jurists like Jacqueline Connorswith TelTY Friedman and Patricia Collins. I know all three. YOLll' painting all of themwith the same brush stroke seriously hurts your interests.

You ha\'e something else working against you - your passion, People in thelegal field shun people who fee I passionate, 1 cannot explain why this is so - it is aquirk oftht:' American psyche. The angrier and 1110re passionate you are. the less andless anyone in the legal filed \vill want to have anything to do \vit11 you.

I recently represented an Israeli who had been telTibly cheated and who was1.000 per cent innocent ofany wrong doing. One ofmy hardest tasks was keeping himquiet. I Ie could not believe that people did not want to hear his story. They do not-not in the American legal system, I cannot explain \\'hy - that is just the way it is,Almost e\'t::ry client does hTfeat hanll to his case when he/she takes the stand.

There are an infinite number of ways that court call organize themselves. Ya l lh a \ ' t ~ to leam to distinguish between its arbitrary organization \\'hich you do not like andcOlTuption in the judicial system. Because you have had a couple attomeys. it appearsthat you lll.ly not be listening to them when they try to explain certain features of thesystem 1,0 you. For example. some orders may be dated I lUllC pO l ' t li ll C \vithout beingCOlTUpt. To you that may look like illegal back-dating. but within the rules ofthe court.it is nOl, bLick-dating. It can be holding an order in abeyance until a certain eventoccurs. I lla\'e no comment on the back-dated orders in your case. except to point outthe need to distinguish between arbitrary rules whicll are 110t COlTUpt and a COlTUptviolation of court rules.

AlsCI I believe that shou'ld no confuse tIle vile jurists like Jacqueline Connorswith TelTY Friedman and Patricia Collins. I know all three. YOLll' painting all of themwith the same brush stroke seriously hurts your interests.

You ha\'e something else working against you - your passion, People in thelegal field sllLLl1 people \\'110 feel passionate, 1 cannot explain why this is so - it is aquirk oftht:' American psyche. The angrier and 1110re passionate you are. the less andless anyone in the legal filed \vi11 want to have anything to do \'/it11 you.

I recently represented an Israeli who had been telTibly cheated and who was1.000 per cent innocent ofany wrong doing. One ofmy hardest tasks was keeping himquiet. I Ie could not believe that people did not want to hear 11is story. They do not-not in the American legal system, I cannot explain \\'hy - that is just the way it is,Almost e\'t::ry client does hTfeat hal1l1 to his case wllert he/she takes the stand.

There are all infinite l1Lllllber of ways that court can organize themselves. YOLlh a \ ' t ~ to leam to distinguish between its arbitrary organization \\'l1ich you do not like andcOlTuption in the judicial system. Because you have had a couple attomeys. it appearsthat you lll.ly not be listening to them when they try to explain certain featLlres of thesystem 1,0 you. For example. some orders may be dated I lUllC pO l ' t li ll C \vithout beingCOlTLlpt. To you that may look like illegal back-dating. but within the rules of the court.it is n01. bLick-dating. It can be holding an order in abeyance until a certain eventoccurs. I ha\'e no comment on The back-dated orders in yom case. except to point outthe need to distinguish between arbitrary rules whicll are not COlTUpt and a corruptviolatioll of court rules.

Als(l I believe that shou'ld no confuse tl1e vile jurists like Jacqueline Connorswith TelTY Friedman and Patricia Collins. I know all three. YOLll' painting all of1hemwith the same brush stroke seriously hurts your interests.

You ha\'e something else working against you - your passion, People in thelegal field sllLLl1 people \\'110 feel passionate, 1 cannot explain why this is so - it is aquirk oftht:' American psyche. The angrier and 1110re passionate you are. the less andless anyone in the legal filed \vi11 want to have anything to do \vith you.

I recently represented an Israeli who had been telTibly cheated and W110 wasI.GOO per cent innocent ofany wrong doing. One ofmy hardest tasks was keeping himquiet. I Ie could not believe that people did not want to hear 11is story. They do not-not in the American legal system. I cannot explain \\'hy - that is just the way it is.Almost e\'t::ry client does hTfeat hal1ll to his case wIlen he/she takes the stand.

There are an infinite l1Lllllber of ways that court can organize themselves. YOLlh a \ ' t ~ to leam to distinguish between its arbitrary organization \\'l1ich you do not like andcOlTuption in the judicial system. Because you have had a couple attomeys. it appearsthat you lll.ly not be listening to them when t1ley try to explain certain featLlres of thesystem 1,0 you. For example. some orders may be dated nUllC pOl' tunc \vithoLlt beingCOlTLlpt. To you that may look like i11egal back-dating. but within the rules of the court.it is n01. bLick-dating. It can be holding an order in abeyance until a certain eventoccurs. I l1a\'e no comment on The back-dated orders in yom case. except to point outthe need to distinguish between arbitrary rules whicll are not COlTUpt and a corruptviolation of court rules.

Alsu I believe that shou'ld no confuse tIle vile jurists like Jacqueline Connorswith TelTY Friedman and Patricia Collins. I know a11 three. YOLll' painting all of1hemwith the same brush stroke seriously hurts your interests.


4/4

08-08-19 Judge Jacqueline Connor Conduct at the Criminal Division and the Rampart scandal...

Documents

Transcript of 08-08-19 Judge Jacqueline Connor Conduct at the Criminal Division and the Rampart scandal...