06M Buddhism 1 - University of Washington
Transcript of 06M Buddhism 1 - University of Washington
1
Wk 06 Mon, Feb 8
Today Intro to Buddhism
– Khilnani, Sunil. 2016. "The Buddha: Waking IndiaUp." In Incarnations: A History of India in Fifty Lives,9
– Ch. 3 on Buddha’s Middle Way in Hamilton’s IP: VSI Asaf Federman, 2010. "What Kind of Free Will
Did the Buddha Teach?" Karin Meyers on “Free Persons, Empty Selves,”
Chapter 2, FWASIP, Dasti & Bryant, eds. 2014. Optional: Luis O. Gómez, 1975. "Some Aspects
of the Free-Will Question in the Nikāyas."
2
Wednesday, Wk 06Further developments in Buddhism Jay L. Garfield ’s Ch. 7, “Just Another
Word for Nothing Left to Lose” in Dasti, Matthew and Edwin Bryant, eds. 2014.FWASIP
Ch. 6 on Things & No-things in Hamilton’s IP: VSI
WOTD• Dependent Origination Miles
• Fortuity Dhruv
• cetovasippatta, having mastery over his mind Dhandeep
3
The Buddha ~450-370 BCE
– vs. 563-483 BCE Born in present-day
Nepal Language: precursor to
Magadhi → Pali Other Names
– Siddhārtha Gautama– Śākyamuni– Tathāgata
Cave Paintings @ Ajanta
Avalokiteśvara / Padmapāni, Bodhisattva of compassion.
Two women, Cave 2
4
Ajanta, cont’d
Dancing girl in Ajanta fresco, a 2012 photograph (left), Robert Gill's copy 19th-century
Dhamma Chakka / Dharma Chakra
Worshipers under 24 spokes of the Buddhist Ashoka Chakra12 links of Dependent Origination, 12 links of the reverseAshokan pillar at Sanchi
5
Śramaṇa-s, mendicantsPer Dīgha-Nikāya 2, reports of 6 heretic teachers, their doctrines:1. Pūrāṇa Kāśyapa, amoralism / antinomianism2. Maskarī Gośāliputra, fatalism - Ājivika3. Sañjayī Vairaṭṭīputra, agnosticism / skepticism4. Ajita Keśakambala, materialism5. Nirgrantha Jñātiputra, restraint / Jainism6. Kakuda Kātyāyana, eternalism / atomicism
The 3 Insights of the Buddha1. See his previous lives & their influence on
subsequent lives,2. See the consequences of past lives on current
life of others,3. How to eradicate factors that lead to continued
rebirth:• Appetitive desires• Desire for continued existence• Ignorance of true nature of reality• Holding of opinionated ‘views’ (Hamilton, 42-5)
6
Four Noble TruthsRealized @ age 35 in Bodhgayā1. Life is dukkha, dissatisfaction / sorrow / suffering
2. Dukkha is caused by tanhā /tṛṣṇā, thirst / craving
3. Nirvāṇa, cessation of dukkha is possible4. Way to cessation = liberation is the Noble
Eightfold Path
Noble Eightfold Path = Middle Way
śila, ethical practices1. Right Speech2. Right Action3. Right Livingsamādhi, stages of meditation4. Right Effort5. Right Mindfulness6. Right Concentrationprajñā, knowledge & wisdom7. Right Views8. Right Resolve
7
Central Concepts Everything is impermanent, anitya Everything has no self, anattā / anātmā Personality = 5 aggregates, skandha-s These constitute dukkha
1. Material quality, rūpa2. Feelings / sensations, vedanā3. Perceptions, saṃjñā4. Predispositions, saṃskāra5. Consciousness, vijñāna
Cessation of suffering = nirvāṇa
12-fold Dependent Origination,pratītya-samutpāda
Pāli: paṭiccasamuppanna1. ignorance → (causes)2. karma / saṃskāra →3. consciousness →4. name & form →5. 6 sense organs →6. contact (with objects) →7. sensation / feeling →8. desire / craving →9. attachment →10. existence →11. birth →12. old age, death, sorrow, misery, lamentation [… → ignorance]
passive, resulting from past karma
the cycle can be broken here
8
Textual Sources Theravāda Pali canon, tri-piṭaka (3 baskets)
1. Vinaya, monastic rules2. Sūtra, discourses = Nikāyas / Āgamas
1. Dīgha, long2. Majjhima, middle-length3. Saṃyukta, connected4. Aṇguttara / Ekottara, numerical lists5. Kuddaka, 15 small texts including
– Dhammapada, Udāna, Sutta, Therigātha, Jātaka
3. Abhidharma, scholastic / philosophical
Some Early Schools“Hīnayāna, Lesser Vehicle”
Theravāda, Elders – Sri Lanka, SE Asia Mahāsaṅgika …. → Mahāyāna
– ~320 BCE– ~100 years after Buddha’s parinirvāṇa
Sarvāstivāda, ~250 BCE Sautrāntika … → Yogācāra / Vijñānavāda
– ~100 CE
9
Asaf Federman on the Buddha & Free Will
Federman Soteriology? anattā + anitya = no agent ? Buddha’s teachings = Free Will?
– choice, responsibility – denial of Fatalism, Maskarī Gośāliputra
Dependent Origination = Determinism ?
Free Will + Determinism = Compatibilism
10
p. 19, Thomas Pink. 2004. Free Will: A VSI. OUP.
FedermanTwo conflicting definitions of Free Will1. FW1 = a power that:
– belongs in the soul, – transcends the physical, – has ultimate control over the body
2. FW2 =– “agent's ability to control action in
conformity with will, when there are no constraints that limit performance (3).” Compatibilist definition?
11
Federman Freedom = psychological
– mind free from what binds– awareness of one’s desires & wishes (10)
Causality governs– physical, organic, psychological, karmic, and
spiritual spheres (12)– Karma not sole cause, ≠ hard determinism
Determinism ≠ inevitability “unavoidable (13)”– agent can be one of the causes
Karin Meyers on “Free Persons, Empty Selves”
12
Two Truths, A1. Conventional, saṃvṛti-satya
– Ordinary / relative – Language-based
2. Ultimate, paramārtha-satya– Nirvāṇa
Meyers cetanā = will, volition, intention
– = mental action, karma– not always conscious / voluntary / deliberate (46) needs other factors such as mindfulness, clear
awareness (59)– conditioned by self-grasping ← autonomy– necessary but not sufficient condition for moral
responsibility
13
Varieties of Free Will, review Causal Determinism: prior events → exactly one
metaphysically possible future (48)
Can Determinism coexist with Free Will? If Yes, Compatibilism
– Agent has control over actions If No, Incompatibilism
– If no free will, Hard Determinism Fatalism
– Extreme response to Hard Determinism– Our efforts don’t affect the future
– If free will exists, Determinism impossible Libertarianism
Meyers Buddhism subscribes to Compatibilism
– Neutral on Determinism (57) Presumes choice over action
– We have freedom to choose to work for liberation Cultivation of self-control prescribed through
development of the five Spiritual Faculties, bala– faith śraddhā, energy vīrya, mindfulness smṛti,
concentration samādhi, discernment prajñā (51) “Greater freedom and self-control through
recognition of non-self (51)”– Undermines sense of agency / autonomy / responsibility?
14
Meyers: Two Truths, B1. Conventional truth, saṃvṛti-satya
– Agents, agency, free will– Mental construct, no independent reality– Personal– Autonomy is a necessary delusion, distortion (61)
2. Ultimate truth, paramārtha-satya– Only dharma-s, factors– Irreducible, independent– Impersonal: no agent, no free will
Delusion of Autonomy From the Ultimate perspective, actions
afflicted by self-grasping are– less than fully rational– not self-controlled– functionally insane (60)
Yet, shame hrī & apprehension apatrāpya– basis for virtue– foundation of path to liberation– attract wholesome qualities that ultimately
destroy the delusion (63)
15
Ultimately No persons, no free will
– just a flow of dharmas