Standing Committee on Finance Submissions : (Draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 24 June 2009 PwC...
-
Upload
richard-melton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Standing Committee on Finance Submissions : (Draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 24 June 2009 PwC...
Standing Committee on Finance
Submissions :(Draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills
24 June 2009
PwC Tax Services*, South Africa
*connectedthinking
Slide 2Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
Contents
I. Consultation Period
II. 2nd Provisional Tax Estimate
III. Trading Stock – Mining stock-piles
IV. CERs
V. CFCs
VI. Research & Development
VII. Dividends Tax & Deemed Dividends
VIII. Dividends Tax on Capitalisation Shares
IX. Cross-issue of shares
X. Employer-provided post retirement medical aid
XI. Foreign Portfolio Shares
Slide 3Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
I. Consultation Period
• Very short consultation period – AGAIN
• Complexity and volume– Seasoned tax practitioners require more time. What about average
taxpayers
• No chance of further debate after today– Further submissions to NT/SARS – but not to Standing Committee– Need for rebuttal acknowledged previously – but?
Slide 4Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
II. 2nd Provisional Tax Estimate
• Unfair proposal−No benefit for taxpayers not part of “designated class”−Substantial hardship also for larger “sophisticated” taxpayers
• Inappropriate for relief to be left to Commissioner’s discretion.−Removes contentious and problematic issue from public debate.
• International precedent does not support the combination of−High accuracy requirement (80%)
together with−Harsh penalty (20%)
Slide 5Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
2nd Provisional Tax Estimate
Irish Preliminary Tax:
• 90% accuracy requirement−Interest (not penalty) upon under-estimate
• Safe harbour for individuals−100% of previous year’s tax liability−105% of tax liability from year before last
SA taxpayers get the worst of both worlds?
Slide 6Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
III. Trading Stock – Mining Stockpiles
• Inclusion of stockpiles - undue burden on mining industry (esp in current economic climate)
• Valuation complexities• Sudden increase in Taxable Income
• Definition extended too wide –Will include property not intended to be trading stock
Slide 7Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
IV. Certified Emission Reductions
• Proposals welcomed & applauded- Although time frame may be too short to incentivise new CDM projects
• Confirm full deductibility of expenditure- Especially “mixed purpose” expenditure
• Ensure exclusion of CERs from “trading stock”
• CERs distributed in return for capital contribution- Exempt in-specie distribution of CERs from STC & Dividends Tax
• VAT: Provide specific Zero-rating provision
Slide 8Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
V. Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC’s)
• Exemptions (s9D(9)) should be elective
• SA cannot be gatekeeper for foreign tax- SA multinationals disadvantaged- Remove requirement that choice of FBE
not motivated by foreign tax
Slide 9Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC’s)
• Inappropriate emphasis on “incorporation” inappropriate
(for both “foreign business establishment & “high tax” exemptions)- Consider tax residence –or ignore residence/incorporation altogether- Focus is on substance (“establishment”) or actual tax paid (“high tax”)
• High tax exemption : Confirm ability to use loss carry-backs and “group” losses as allowed under foreign tax laws- Do not limit loss-utilisation to SA concept of “assessed losses”
• Tax paid @20% will not reach 75%-of-SA-Tax threshold- Apply 2/3 or 70% test
Slide 10Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
VI. Research & Development
• Applaud initiative to incentivise R&D activities in SA- Including foreign-funded R&D
• But recoupment provisions negate incentive – Unintended?- Re-confirm ability of SA contract-researchers to receive
tax benefits from foreign-funded R&D
Slide 11Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
VII. Dividends Tax & Deemed Dividends
• Deem actual shareholder to be deemed recipient
• Double Taxation when Deemed Dividend followed by actual dividend- Deemed dividend should increase “contributed tax capital”
• Exit charge should be reduced by “contributed tax capital”
• Financial assistance refinements required- Capital amount should not be deemed dividend if transfer pricing
adjustment to interest- Interest rate exemption: Dual test should be simplified- Exemption for loans to share incentive trusts (etc.)
Slide 12Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
VIII. Dividends Tax on Capitalisation Shares
• Departure from “ability to pay” principle
• Will skew market towards preferring cash over shares
• Enhancements of preferences or rights – vague and uncertain- Double tax potential where also value shifting arrangement for CGT- Valuation of enhancements difficult
Slide 13Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
IX. Employer-provided Post Retirement Medical Aid
• Allow deduction also in respect of current employees• Difficult to separate contributions between current and former employees
• Allow deduction even if employer still has some obligations to employee• If risk substantially transferred to insurer• Economic effect same as case of former employees.
• Confirm exemption for employees
• Allow deduction for all post-retirement obligations
Slide 14Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
X. Cross Issue of Shares Anomaly
A
Target
B
A BTargeted cross-issue :
• A issues shares to B, in return for B issuing shares to A
• s24B(2): A’s cost of B shares = Nil,; & B’s cost of A shares = Nil
Unintended Anomaly :
• A buys B-shares, then B buys Target-shares
• s24B(2): A’s cost of B shares = NIL; & B’s cost of Target shares = NIL
Slide 15Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
X. Cross Issue of Shares Anomaly
Proposed amendment does not rectify anomaly
• Relief only to “groups” limits protection unfairly – e.g. most BEE transactions are not “group” transactions
• Only corrects one element of the anomaly- (Covers B’s cost in Target, but what about A’s cost in B)
• Does not clearly cover cash transactions
A
Target
B
Slide 16Submissions on the (draft) Taxation Laws Amendment Bills 2009PricewaterhouseCoopers
June 2009
X. Foreign Portfolio Shares
• Foreign (listed) dividends should not be taxed when paid to SA companies or CISs
• Confirm retention of Normal Tax exemption (s10(1)(k)(ii)(bb))
© 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc is an authorised financial services provider.
Thank you