TARGETING PARTICULAR GROUPS

The use of ICF

% of jobseekers finding a job

< 18 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 >= 600.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

>2 jaar

1-2 jaar

<1 jaar

3.6

7.5

9.3 9.4

8.17.5

6.2

4.9

2.1

0.6 0.7

6.1

9.5

14.913.8

12.111.1

10.18.9

5.8

3.1 2.8

8.4

19.2

25.9

19.6

15.815.0 14.6

13.9

11.8

7.87.2

VDAB/WSE 2013

PES standard approach (2004)

< 25 & highly skilled3 months >25 & low skilled

Inscription 6 months > 25 & highly skilled

Job offers

9 months

6 months

Screening by phone

individual pathway with training, work

experience,…

face to face intake by

counsellor

Pathway to work

3

PES: Intake and screening

4

online inscription

e-coaching

enlarging job orientationperson with disability

face to face counselling language skillsregional priorities

sectoral screening …

certification of skills

medical testing

specialised screening

ALMP: standard approach (schematic)

5

6/9 months

2 years unemploymentwork experience, localservices econonomy

5 years unemploymentsocial workplacessheltered workplaces*

training, job search support,…

From a standard approach to a tailormade approach

• Basic criteria:– Degree/certification– Unemployment spell– Disabilities

• Evolution in jobseekers• Other partnerships• Some experiments

7

ICF

Health condition • autism spectrum disorder

• …

Body functions & structure

• b 1263 : psychical stability

• b 1642: timemanagement

• ….

Activities and Participation

• d 4: mobility• d 2401: coping with stress• d 7202: behaviour in

company (agression etc)• …

Environmental factors

• e 310: Support of and relation to family

• e 325: Support of and relation to colegues

• e 330: Support of and relation to hierarchical superiors

• …

Personal factors

• gender• work experience• vocational training• skills• …

ICF

8

Designing the tool ICF compared to other tools Selection of ICF categories Input and feedback from other partners

Þ a selection of 49 categoriesÞ 4 points scale

Research Let’s put the tool to the test!

600 surveys in different measures social economy and guidance of vulnerable groups (employment, unemployment)

Training of counsellors and coaches Assessment of participants

11

Statistisch onderzoek

■ 2 Objectives:

1. Determine the boundaries

1.1. When can we consider a person to be vulnerable and in need for support?

1.2. How determine the right ALMP measure?

2. Research on the quality of the tool

2.1. Analysis by factors2.2. Reliability when different persons use the tool2.3. Internal consistency

11

12

■ Via datamining

Are there some patterns in the data- that determine a vulnerable group more then others? - that could be used to differentiate ALMP measures?

Research determinated some statistical decision rules

More research

12

Shift from a standard approach to a tailor made approach PES and partners

Training in ICF Adaptation of intake and screening tools ICT

Tool is used in guidance of vulnerable groups and screening

Tool will be used to determine acces to ALMP Sheltered & social workplaces Local economy initiatives

Tool will be used to evaluate use of ALMP

Patricia VromanPolicy advisor Target groups & Activation

Dept Work & Social Economy

+32 (0)2 553 39 45

Patricia.vroman@wse.vlaanderen.be