Post on 07-Jul-2018
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
1/41
Experiences in Integrating PV and
Other DG to the Power System(Radial Distribution Systems)
Prepared by:
Philip Barker
Founder and Principal EngineerNova Energy Specialists, LLC
Schenectady, NY
Phone (518) 346-9770
Website: novaenergyspecialists.com
E-Mail: pbarker@nycap.rr.com
Presented at:
Utility Wind Interest Group (UWIG)
6th Annual Distributed Wind/Solar Interconnection Workshop
February 22-24, 2012
Golden, CO1Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
2/41
Topics
• Discussion of Distribution and Subtransmission
Factors Considered in Basic DG integration Studies
• Useful Ratios for Screening Analysis of DG Impacts
• Review of Some System Impacts:
– Voltage Issues
– Fault Current Issues
– Islanding Issues
– Ground Fault Overvoltage Issues
• Summary and Conclusions of PV Experiences
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 2
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
3/41
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 3
12.47 kV
Subtransmission Line
Substation
Transformer
LTC
DG
Distribution
Feeder
Rotating Machine orInverter based DG
Step Up
Transformer
Subtransmission
Source
Bulk
System
Reclosing and
Relay Settings
Primary Feeder
Point of Connection
(POC)
Other Substations
with Load and DG
Customer
Site Load
Adjacent
Feeders
Voltage Regulator
Discussion of
Some Factors to
Consider in DG
Integration
Regulator andLTC Settings
Capacitor
Alt. Feed
Alt. Feed
Other load and
DG scattered onfeeder
Type of
Grounding
Prime mover or
energy source
characteristics
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
4/41
Some Useful Penetration Ratios
for Screening Analysis
• Minimum Load to Generation Ratio(this is the annual minimum load on the relevant power system section
divided by the aggregate DG capacity on the power system section)
• Stiffness Factor (the available utility fault current divided by DGrated output current in the affected area)
• Fault Ratio Factor (also called SCCR)(available utility fault current divided by DG fault contribution in the
affected area) (Note: also called Short Circuit Contribution Ratio: SCCR)
• Ground Source Impedance Ratio (ratio of zerosequence impedance of DG ground source relative to utility ground source
impedance at point of connection)
NREL Workshop on High Penetration PV: Defining High Penetration PV – Multiple Definitions and Where to Apply Them Phil Barker, Nova Energy Specialists, LLC
Note: all ratios above are based on the aggregate DG sources on the system area of interest where appropriate
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 4
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
5/41
Minimum Load to Generation Ratio
(MLGR)
• Try to use the annual minimum load (don’t
just assume 1 week of measurements gives
the minimum)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 5
Time (up to 1 year is ideal)
Minimum
Load
Peak Load
Weekend
Weekdays
Annual Minimum Load
False Minimum
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
6/41
Name of
Ratio What is Ratio useful for?(Note: these ratios are intended for distribution and
subtransmission system impacts of DG for the types of impacts
described below.)
Suggested Penetration Level Ratios(1)
Very Low
Penetration(Very low probability
of any issues)
Moderate
Penetration(Low to minor probability
of issues)
Higher
Penetration(4) (Increased probability
of serious issues.
Minimum
Load to
Generation
Ratio
[MLGR](2)
• MLGR used for Ground Fault
Overvoltage Suppression Analysis(use ratios shown when DG is not effectively
grounded)
>10Synchronous Gen.
10 to 5Synchronous Gen.
Less than 5Synchronous Gen.
>6Inverters(3)
6 to 3Inverters(3)
Less than 3Inverters(3)
• MLGR used for Islanding Analysis(use ratios 50% larger than shown when
minimum load characteristics are not well
defined or if significant load dropout is a
concern during sags.)
>4 4 to 2 Less than 2
Notes:1. Ratios are meant as guides for radial 4-wire multigrounded neutral distribution system DG applications and are calculated based on aggregate DG on relevant power system sections
2. “Minimum load” is the lowest annual load on the line section of interest (up to the nearest applicable protective device). Presence of power factor correction banks that result in a surplus
of VARs on the “islanded line section of interest” may require slightly higher ratios than shown to be sure overvoltage is sufficiently suppressed.
3. Inverters are inherently weaker sources than rotating machines therefore this is why a smaller ratio is shown for them than rotating machines4. If DG application falls in this “higher penetration” category it means some system upgrades/adjustments are likely needed to avoid power system issues.
NREL Workshop on High Penetration PV: Defining High Penetration PV – Multiple Definitions and Where to Apply Them Phil Barker, Nova Energy Specialists, LLC
Some Helpful Screening Thresholds
the Author Uses in His Studies
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 6
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
7/41
Type of
Ratio What is it useful for?(Note: these ratios are intended for distribution and
subtransmission system impacts of DG for the types of
impacts described below.)
Suggested Penetration Level Ratios(1)
Very Low
Penetration(Very low probability
of any issues)
Moderate
Penetration(Low to minor probability
of issues)
Higher
Penetration(3) (Increased probability
of serious issues.
Fault RatioFactor
(ISCUtility/ISCDG)
• Overcurrent device coordination
• Overcurrent device ratings >100 100 to 20
Less than
20
Ground Source
Impedance
Ratio(2)
• Ground fault desensitization
• Overcurrent device coordination
and ratings>100 100 to 20
Less than
20
StiffnessFactor
(ISCUtililty/IRatedDG)
• Voltage Regulation
(this ratio is a good indicator of voltageinfluence. Wind/PV have higher ratios
due to their fluctuations. Besides this
ratio, may need to check for current
reversal at upstream regulator devices.)
>100PV/Wind
100 to 50PV/Wind
Less than 50PV/Wind
> 50Steady Source
50 to 25Steady Source
Less than 25Steady Source
Notes:1. Ratios are meant as guides for radial 4-wire multigrounded neutral distribution system DG applications and are calculated based on aggregate DG on relevant power system sections
2. Useful when DG or it’s interface transformer provides a ground source contribution. Must include effect of grounding step -up transformer and/or accessory ground banks if present.
3. If DG application falls in this “higher penetration” category it means some system upgrades/adjustments are likely needed to avoid power system issues.
NREL Workshop on High Penetration PV: Defining High Penetration PV – Multiple Definitions and Where to Apply Them Phil Barker, Nova Energy Specialists, LLC
Screening Ratios (Continued)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 7
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
8/41NREL Workshop on High Penetration PV: Defining High Penetration PV – Multiple Definitions and Where to Apply Them Phil Barker, Nova Energy Specialists, LLC
What Does it Mean if it Falls
Into the Higher Penetration Category?
• If the DG application falls into these higher penetration
categories , then a detailed study is generally recommended
and may lead to the need for mitigation
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 8
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
9/41
In addition to the ratios discussed in the prior
slides, also check for:
• Reverse power flow at any voltage regulator or transformer LTC bank: if
present, check compatibility of the controls and settings of regulator
controls.
• Check line drop compensation interaction: if employed by any upstream
regulator, do a screening calculation of the voltage change seen at theregulator with the R and X impedance settings actually employed at the
regulator. Generally, if ΔV < 1% seen by the regulator controller
calculated for the full rated power change of DG, then line drop
compensation effects and LTC cycling is not usually an issue.
• Capacitor Banks: if significant VAR surplus on a possible islanded area
study for potential impact
• Fast Reclosing Dead Times: if less than 5 seconds (especially those less
than 2 seconds) consider the danger of reclosing into live island.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 9
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
10/41
Caveats for Use of the Ratios & Checks
• Ratios we have discussed on preceding slides are only guides
for establishing when distribution and subtransmission system
effects of DG become “significant” to the point of requiring
more detailed studies and/or potential mitigation options.
• They must be applied by knowledgeable engineers that
understand the context of the situation and the exceptions
where the ratios don’t work
• It requires a lot more than just these slides here to do this topic
justice. We have omitted a lot of details due to the short
presentation format so this is just meant as a brief illustration
of these issues.
NREL Workshop on High Penetration PV: Defining High Penetration PV – Multiple Definitions and Where to Apply Them Phil Barker, Nova Energy Specialists, LLCPrepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 10
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
11/41
Voltage Regulation & Variation Issues
• Steady State Voltage (ANSI C84.1 voltage
limits)
• Voltage Excursions and LTC Cycling
• Voltage Flicker
• Line Drop Compensator Interactions
• Reverse Power Interactions
• Regulation Mode Compatibility Interactions
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 11
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
12/41
High Voltage Caused by Too Much
DG at End of Regulation Zone
SUBSTATION
Voltage
Distance
Heavy Load No DG
Heavy Load
(DG High Output)
End
ANSI C84.1 Lower
Limit (114 volts)
Light Load
(DG at High Output)ANSI C84.1 UpperLimit (126 volts)
Cos RSin X I V DG
LTC Large DG exports
large amounts of
power up feeder
I DG
Feeder (with R and X)
IEEE 1547 trip Limit (132 Volts)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 12
DG current
at angle
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
13/41
Impact of Distributed Generation
on Line Drop Compensation
V o l t a
g e
Distance
Heavy Load No DG
Heavy Load with DG
End
ANSI C84.1 Lower Limit (114 volts)
Light Load No DG
SUBSTATIONLTC
Large DG(many MW)
DG Supports most of
feeder load
Exporting DG “shields” the
substation LTC controller
from seeing the feeder
current. The LTC sees less
current than there is and
does not boost voltage
adequately.
CT
Line drop
compensator
LTC Controller
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 13
ANSI C84.1 Upper Limit (114 volts)
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
14/41
Voltage Regulator Reverse Mode
Confused by DG Reverse Power
SUBSTATION
LTC
Reverse
Power Flow
Due to DG
Supplementary
Regulator with Bi-
Directional controls
Normally
Closed
Recloser
R
R
Normally
Open
Recloser
DG
Supplementary regulator senses reverse power and
erroneously assumes that auto-loop has operated – it
attempts to regulate voltage on the substation side of
the supplementary regulator
What happens? Since the feeder is still connected to the substation, the line regulator once it isforced into the reverse mode will be attempting to regulate the front section of the feeder. To do
this can cause the supplementary regulator to “runaway” to either its maximum or minimum tap
setting to attempt to achieve the desired set voltage. This in turn could cause dangerously high or
low voltage on the DG side of the regulator. This occurs because the source on DG side of regulator
is voltage following (not aiming to a particular voltage set point) and is weak compared to the
substation source.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 14
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
15/41
Fluctuating Output of aPhotovoltaic Power Plant
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Days
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
16/41
Cos RSin X I V DG
System Impedance
DG Starting Current
and DG Running current
fluctuations DG
ΔIDG
Infinite
Source R X
V Flicker Voltage Example
The GE Flicker Curve
(IEEE Standard 141-1993 and 519-1992)Flicker
Screening:Using the voltage drop screeningformula to estimate the ΔV for a
given DG current change (ΔIDG).
Then plot ΔV on the flicker curve
using expected time period
between fluctuations
Realize that this is a basic screening concept. For situationswhere there might be more significant dynamic interactionswith other loads, or utility system equipment, a dynamicsimulation with a program such as EMTP or PSS/E may berequired to verify if flicker will be visible.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 16
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
17/41
A Conservative Quick Screen for PV Flicker(Not as accurate as IEEE 1453 method but easy and quick for PV)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 17
P e r c e n t V o l t a g e C h a n g e ( V % )
Adjusted Borderline of Visibility Curves for PV: This
curve used/developed by NES represents a conservativemodification to the regular IEEE flicker visibility curve. This
curve for PV is meant to capture the fact that PV is not
square modulation, and is based on cloud ramping rates,
and possible LTC interactions causing flicker.
IEEE 519-1992 Borderline of Irritation Curve
519 Visibility
Curve x 2.0
519 Irritation
Curve x
1.25X
Adjusted Borderline of Irritation Curve for PV: This curve used/developed by
NES represents a conservative modification to the regular IEEE flicker irritation
curve. This curve for PV is meant to capture the fact that PV is not squaremodulation, and is based on cloud ramping rates, and possible LTC interactions
causing flicker.
IEEE 519-1992 Borderline
of Visibility Curve
This is the IEEE 519-1992 flicker
curve, but with two new adjusted
curves added by NES to
conservatively approximate PV
flicker thresholds.
While the IEEE 1453 method basedon Pst, Plt is still the most
technically robust approach and
should allow best results in tight
situations, it is the author’s view that
this adjusted IEEE 519-1992 curve
approach shown here can serve as
a cruder but easier alternative
method to facilitate quick screens.
Note that for PV, the regular IEEE
519-1992 curves are generally too
conservative from a flicker visibility
perspective due to the fact that PV
fluctuations are more rounded rather
than square.
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
18/41
PV Flicker Experiences
• Use of IEEE 1453 method is a technically very robust
screening methodology for flicker when very accurate
threshold levels need to be determined
• However, a suggested modified GE flicker curve canwork well for PV as a conservative tool for simple
screening when less accuracy is required
• It is the author’s experience that other voltageproblems (LTC cycling, ANSI limits, etc.) related to PV
become problematic at lower capacity thresholds
than flicker – flicker is one of the last concerns to arise
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 18
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
19/41
Some DG Fault Current Issues
• Impact of current on breaker, fuse, recloser,
coordination. Affect on directional devices and
impedance sensing devices.
• Increase in fault levels (interrupting capacity of
breakers on the utility system)
• Nuisance trips due to “backfeed” fault current
• Distribution transformer rupture issues
• Impact on temporary fault clearing/deionization
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 19
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
20/41
Fault Currents of Rotating Machines
Separately-ExcitedSynchronous Generator
2 to 4 times rated current
F a u l t C u r r e n
t
Time
Subtransient Period
Envelope
Transient Period
Envelope Steady State Period
Envelope
F a u l t C u r r e n
t
Time
Subtransient Period
Envelope
Transient Period
Envelope Steady State Period
Envelope
4-10 times rated current
Induction Machine
Current decays toessentially zero
Current Decay Envelope
37%
Transient Time Constant
Time
100%
F a u l t C u r r e n t
4-10 timesrated current
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 20
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
21/41
Pre-fault Fault Current Worst casei
t
Fault Current Contributions of Inverters
Note: The exact nature and duration of the fault contribution from aninverter is much more difficult to predict than a rotating machine. It is afunction of the inverter controller design, the thermal protection functionsfor the IGBT and the depth of voltage sag at the inverter terminals. Inthe worst case if fault contributions do continue for more than ½ cycle,they are typically no more than 1 to 2 times the inverter steady statecurrent rating.
Best Case: May last only a fewmilliseconds (less than ½ cycle) for manytypical PV, MT and fuel cell inverters
Typical Worst Case: may last forup to the IEEE 1547 limits and be upto 200% of rated current
Irated
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 21
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
22/41
Fault Current Impacts:Nuisance trips, fuse
coordination issues,transformer rupture issues, etc.
Recloser B
13.2 kV
115 kV
Recloser A
DG
Adjacent
Feeder
FaultCase 1
Fault Contribution
from DG Might
Trip The Feeder
Breaker and
Recloser
(Nuisance trip)
Iutility
IDG
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 22
Fault
Case 2
U t i l i t y
DG
U t i l i t y
D G
Fault
Case 3
The good news is that PV is
much less likely than
conventional rotating DG to
cause issues since inverter faultcontributions are smaller!Fault Contribution from
DG Might Interfere with
Fuse Saving or Exceed
Limits of a DeviceTransformer Rupture
Limits (fault magnitude)
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
23/41
The Author’s Experiences
Related to PV Fault Levels
• In doing many projects, I have observed that fault current
problems associated with PV in most cases are not an issue
due to the low currents injected by the inverter (about 1-2
per unit of rating).
• In general, only the largest PV (or large PV aggregations) can
cause enough fault current to even begin to worry current
impacts (there are some special exceptions).
• As PV capacity grows on a circuit, voltage problems usually
arise well before fault currents become an issue. A circuit
without voltage problems is not likely to have fault current
problems due to PV.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 23
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
24/41
Unintentional DG
Islanding Issues
Recloser B
(Normally Open)
13.2 kV
115 kV
Recloser A
DG
Adjacent
Feeder
The recloser has
tripped on its first
instantaneous shot,
now the DG must trip
before a fast reclose is
attempted by the utility
Islanded Area
• Incidents of energizeddowned conductorscan increase (safety)
• Utility system reclosinginto live island may
damage switchgearand loads
• Service restoration canbe delayed and willbecome moredangerous for crews
• Islands may notmaintain suitablepower quality
• Damaging overvoltagescan occur during some
conditionsPrepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 24
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
25/41
Islanding Protection Methods of DG
Passive Relaying Approach (Voltage and frequencywindowing relay functions: 81o, 81u, 27, 59 – ifconditions leave window then unit trips)
Active Approach (instability induced voltage orfrequency drift coupled and/or actively perturbedsystem impedance measurement or other activeparameter measurement)
(UL-1741 utility interactive inverters)
Communication Link Based Approach (use of directtransfer trip [DTT] or other communications means)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 25
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
26/41
Islanding and PV Inverters
• Inverters typically have very effective active anti-
islanding protection.
• Unfortunately, the IEEE 1547 and UL-1741 islanding
protection requirements (2 second response time)are not compatible with high speed utility reclosing
practices used at many utilities
• If minimum load is nearly matched to generationthen provisions such as DTT and/or live line reclose
blocking may be needed, especially with high
speed reclosing situations.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 26
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
27/41
Screening
for
Islanding
Issues
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 27
Start
Is the annual minimum load on any
“Islandable” section at least twice the rated DG
capacity?
Is the DG an Inverter Based
Technology Certified Per
UL1741 Non-IslandingTest?
Islanding Protection May Need
Careful Examination and
Possible Enhancement
Islanding Protection is
Adequate
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No Is the reclosing dead time on the “Islandable”
section ≥ 5 seconds?
Is the DG equipped with at least passive relaying-
based islanding protection?
No
Is the mix of (number of and
capacity) inverters and other
converters and capacitors on the
“Islandable” section within
comfortable limits of the UL1741
algorithms?
No
Yes
Yes
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
28/41
Ground Fault Overvoltage
Ground Fault Overvoltage
can result in seriousdamaging overvoltage on theunfaulted phases. It can beup to roughly 1.73 per unit ofthe pre-fault voltage level.
Neutral
Vcn
Van
Vbn
Before the Fault
Neutral
Voltage
Increases
on Van, Vbn
Vbn
Van
Vcn
During the Fault
Neutral and earth return path
Phase A
Phase B
Phase C
Source
Transformer
(output side)
Fault V bn
V an
V cn
X1, X2 R1, R2
X0 R0
Voltage swell during
ground fault
V(t)
(t)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 28
X1, X2
X1, X2 R1, R2
R1, R2
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
29/41
IEEE Effective Grounding
• Effective grounding is
achieved when the source
impedance has the following
ratios:
Ro/X1 < 1Xo/X1 < 3
• Effective grounding limits the
L-G voltage on the unfaulted
phases to roughly about
1.25-1.35 per unit of nominal
during the fault
• With ungrounded source, the
voltage could be as high as
1.82 per unit.
ideally
grounded
system
Vbn
Van
Vcn
Effectively
grounded
system
Ungrounded
system
N
N
N
1.82 VLN
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 29
Voltage
includes 5%
regulation
factor
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
30/41
Generator Step-Up Transformer
Grounding Issues
deltaNeutral
Neutral
Low Voltage Side (DG facility)
wye
wye wye
Neutral grounding of
generator on low side of
transformer does not impact
grounding condition on high
side
*IMPORTANT: Generator
neutral must be
connected to the
neutral/ground of the
transformer to establish
zero sequence path to
high side
Neutral wye*neutral is not connected
then the source acts as
an ungrounded source
even though transformer
is grounded-wye to
grounded-wye
Acts as grounded
source feeding out to
system only if
generator neutral istied to the transformer
grounded neutral
Acts as ungrounded
source feeding out to
system only if generator
neutral is not connectedto transformer grounded
neutral*
Acts as grounded
source feeding out
to system
C N
A
B
Gen.
C
C N
A
B
Gen.
C
C N
A
B
Gen.
C
Distribution
Transformer
wye
High Voltage Side(to Utility Distribution System Primary)
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 30
G t St U T f
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
31/41
Generator Step-Up Transformer
Grounding Issues – Continued
deltaNeutral
Low Voltage Side (DG facility)
wye
Neutral grounding of
generator on low side of
transformer does not impact
grounding condition on high
side
Acts as ungrounded
source feeding out
to system
C N
A
B
Gen.
C
Distribution
Transformer
High Voltage Side(to Utility Distribution System Primary)
delta
Acts as
ungrounded
source feeding out
to system
Neutral grounding of
generator on low side of
transformer does not impact
grounding condition on high
side
C N
A
B
Gen.
Cdelta
delta wye Neutral grounding at generator
on low side of transformer does
not impact grounding condition
on high side
Acts as
ungrounded
source feeding out
to system
C N
A
B
Gen.
C
Floating Neutral
No connection toTransformer Neutral
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 31
PV Inverter Neutral Is Typically Not
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
32/41
PV Inverter – Neutral Is Typically Not
Effectively Grounded
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 32
Building Neutral
A
A
B
C
Utility
Distribution
Transformer 480V
277V
Delta
12,470V
Wye
B
C
Wye has high resistance neutral
grounding or is essentially ungrounded
Three Phase Inverter with Internal Isolation Transformer all inside an enclosure – a typical arrangement
Safety Ground
Enclosure bond
to safety
ground
Neutral
Neutral Terminal
Usually bonded to earth ground at main service panel
per NEC but this does not make it effectively
grounded if inverter transformer is not so
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
33/41
Ground Fault Overvoltage Issues
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 33
Need enough load on this island with respect aggregate
DG at all connected distribution substations to suppress
overvoltage –
otherwise special solutions are needed!
12.47 kV Line
DG Site 1
Ground
Fault
Feeder
Breaker
Utility System
Bulk Source
Load Load Load
Need enough load on this island with respect aggregate DG
at distribution level to suppress overvoltage – otherwise
effective grounding or other solutions are needed!
Transformer Acts as
ungrounded source
(not effectively
grounded)
Substation transformer acts as grounded source with respect to 12.47
feeder suppressing ground fault overvoltage on distribution until feeder
breaker opens. But it acts as an ungrounded source when feeding
backwards into subtransmission!
Neutral is Ungrounded
or High Z Grounded
Transformer acts as
ungrounded source or acts as
high Z grounded source (if
generator neutral is not
grounded or high z grounded)DG Site 2
Subtransmission
(46kV)
Subtransmission source transformer acts as grounded source
suppressing ground fault overvoltage on subtransmission until
subtransmission breaker opens.
Ground
Fault
Distribution
SubstationDG
DG
Distribution
Substation
Load
Load
Distribution
Substation
Subtransmission
Breaker
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
34/41
Solutions to Ground Fault Overvoltage(any one of these alone will work)
• Effectively ground the DG if possible(But be careful since too much effectively grounded DG can desensitize relaying and cause
other issues. Also, see note 1 with regard to subtransmission impacts of distribution effective
grounding of DG.)
• If DG is not effectively grounded make sure to maintain a minimum loadto aggregate generation ratio >5 for rotating DG and >3 for inverter
generation
• Don’t separate the feeder from the substation grounding source
transformer until sufficient non-effectively grounded DG is “cleared” from
the feeder (e.g. use a time coordinated DTT method.)
• Use grounding transformer banks at strategic point(s) on feeder.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 34
Note 1: On subtransmission since the distribution substations usually feed in through delta (high-side)
windings, effective grounding of DG at the distribution level does not make it effectively grounded with
respect to subtransmission level.
H L d R d
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
35/41
How Load Reduces
Ground Fault Overvoltage
Neutral
Vcg
Vag
Vbg
Before the
Fault
12.47 kV Feeder
Load
Impedance of DG
Source, its transformerand connecting leads
Ground Fault
(phase C)Open
BreakerUtility Source
Neutral
Voltage
Increases
on Vag, Vbg
VbgVcg=0
During Ground Fault
(light load)
Neutral
Voltage does not rise much on Vag, Vbg because the overall size of the
triangle has been reduced (phase to phase voltage has dropped)
Vbg
During Ground Fault
(heavy load)
X
R
Vag
Vcg=0
Vag
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 35
For inverters theexcessive load will
also trigger fast
shutdown to protect
transistors
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
36/41
Grounding Transformer Impedance Sizing
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 36
1
3
1
0
1
0
pv
groundbank
pv
groundbank
X
R
X
X
IEEE Effective Grounding Definition
7.0
2
1
0
1
0
pv
groundbank
pv
groundbank
X
R
X
X
Engineering Targets to Provide Effective
Grounding with Reasonable MarginAssume inverter X1 is 30% for generic worst case30% is not the actual impedance since the inverter
impedance varies due to controller dynamics and operating
state. But 30% is a conservative number that factors worst
case conditions whether the inverter is a current controlled
or voltage controlled PV source. A higher number can be
used for some inverters, but care should be exercised if using
a higher value (especially if it exceeds 50%).
Utility
Primary
Feeder
X1PV = 30% X
t=5%
Utility Source
Grounding
Transformer
Bank
X0groundbank, R0groundbank
Open
Inverter
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
37/41
Ground Transformer Sizing/Rating
• Must be sized such that:
– X0/X1 and R0/X1 ratios are
satisfied with some margin (see
the targets prior slide)
– Bank must be able to handle fault
currents and steady state zero
sequence currents without
exceeding damage limits
– Bank must not desensitize the
utility ground fault relaying or
impact ground flow currents too
much
– Bank may need alarming or
interlock trip of DG if bank trips off.
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 37
Zero Sequence Current Divider
GroundingTransformer
Path
UtilitySource
Path
I0 utility
I0 Total
I0 Ground transformer
d L d
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
38/41
Ferroresonance and Load
Rejection Overvoltage with DG
Conditions to Avoid: Islanded State (Feeder Breaker open)
Generator Rating > minimum load on island
Excessive Capacitance on island
Reliable and fast anti-islanding protection that
clears DG from line before island forms is a
good defense against this type of ferroresonant
condition! Reasonably high MLGR avoids it too.
EMTP Simulation of Ferroresonant
OvervoltageUnfaulted Phase Voltage
Load rejection, ground fault and
resonance related overvoltage
Breaker Opens (island forms)
Normal Voltage
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 38
Waveform shown is Rotating
Machine Type Overvoltage
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
39/41
Outcomes of PV Projects (0.1 to 5 MW) the Author Has
Been Involved With in Various Locations
Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 39
Type of Issue Typical Experience (over 30 projects studied)
Voltage
Regulation
Interactions
Most have not required changes to the regulator or regulation settings and no
special mitigation. A few projects have required regulator setting changes to
reduce the chance of LTC cycling or ANSI C84.1 voltage violations. The largest
sites studied are considering reactive compensation to mitigate LTC cycling and
voltage variations.
Fault CurrentInteractions
No sites except one caused enough additional fault current to impactcoordination or device ratings in a significant manner.
Islanding
Interactions
For islanding protection, roughly 1/3rd of the sites have required something
special beyond the standard UL-1741 inverter with default settings. Some
required more sensitive inverter settings or adjustments to utility reclosing
dead time. A few have needed a radio based or hardwired DTT and/or live line
reclose blocking added.
Ground Fault
Overvoltage
About 1/3rd of the sites need some form of mitigation – usually a grounding
transformer bank, a grounded inverter interface, or a time coordinated DTT
Harmonics No sites have required any special provisions for harmonics yet
OtherSome sites are considering operating in power factor mode producing VARs to
provide reactive power support. One site had a capacitor concern.
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
40/41
Conclusions
• PV and other types of DG today are being successfully
interconnected on distribution feeders all over the country.
In many cases the impacts are not enough to cause
worrisome effects.
• However, the size of projects is growing, especially now that
many large commercial and FIT type projects are being
considered at the distribution level. Also, the ongoing
aggregation effects as PV becomes more widely adopted is
leading to more substantial impacts.
• Many projects can still be screened using simple methods,
but increasingly, more detailed analytical methods are
becoming necessary.Prepared by Nova Energy Specialists, LLC 40
8/18/2019 PVDGIntegration Barker
41/41
Conclusions (continued)
• The “relative size” of the PV (or DG) compared to the power
system to which it is connected plays the key role in system
impact effects. Key factors that gauge the relative size include:
– The MLGR, FRF (SCCR), Stiffness Factor, and GSIR
– The ratios will usually need to be gauged based on aggregate DG in a
zone or region of concern
• The settings of utility voltage regulation equipment and feeder
overcurrent devices and system designs also play a key role.
• The “absolute size” and “project class” (e.g. FIT, net metered)
play a role only in that this impacts the scope and criticality of
the project and may trigger certain regulatory requirements.