Post on 09-Aug-2020
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
1
PROJECT TEAM
OWNER: Modern Homes LLC
ARCHITECT: Cleave Architecture and Design
LANDSCAPE: Root of Design
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
2TA
BLE
OF
CON
TEN
TS COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT INFORMATION
ZONING INFORMATIONTRANSPORTATION
NEIGHBORHOODNEIGHBORHOOD
SURVEYPROPOSED SITE PLAN
AMENITY PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN
FLOOR PLANS- FIRSTFLOOR PLANS- SECOND
FLOOR PLANS- THIRDFLOOR PLANS- ROOF
ELEVATIONSELEVATIONS
ELEVATIONSELEVATIONS
BUILDING MATERIALSPRIVACY- WINDOW STUDIES
ARBORIST REPORTEXCEPTIONAL TREE ENCROACHMENT
MHA DIAGRAMMHA CALCULATIONS
COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY
1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
26
L O YA LH E I G H T S
W H I T T I E RH E I G H T S
N W 8 5 T H S T
N W 8 3 R D S T
N W 8 0 T H S T
15
TH A
VE N
W
8TH
AV
E NW
24
TH A
VE N
W
S I T E
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
3
PRO
JECT
INFO
RMAT
IONPROJECT INFORMATION
ADDRESS: 8027 Mary Ave NW
SDCI #: 3035463-EG
OWNER: Modern Homes LLC
APPLICANT: Cleave Architecture and Design
CONTACT: JustinKliewer
PROJECT PROGRAM
LOT SIZE: 7567 sfBUILDINGTYPE: TownhouseAPPROXFAR: 10570sf(10593.8sfallowable)UNIT COUNT: 8UNIT SIZES: 1291 - 1396 sf gross each unitABOVE-GROUND STORIES: 3 PARKINGSTALLS: 7surfacespaces(0required)
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTheproposedprojectwilldemolishtheexistingstructureandconstructtwo4-unittownhouses.Theprojectwillprovide7surfaceparkingspacesaccessedfromtheexistingalley.
PROJECT DESIGN CONCEPTThedesignconceptistomaximizesitepotentialtoprovidemarketratehomesforfee-simpleownership.Thesitedesignprovidesastreetfacingentryfortheeastunits.Thebuildingisarrangedinafoursquarepatterntomaximizenaturaldaylightandventilationtolivingspaces.Thestaircorehasbeenlocatedatthecenterofeachbuildingtoreducetheperceivedheightbypullingtheroofstairenclosureawayfromthebuildingperimeter.TheneighborhoodhasbeenrezonedfromsinglefamilytoLow-Riseandwilltransitionfromsmallerscalehousingtolargercontemporarytownhousesoverthenextseveralyears.
HIGHEST PRIORITY DESIGN GUIDELINES
CS2 A:LocationintheCityandNeighborhood D:Height,BulkandScaleWhiletheallowableheightlimitis40’withanadditional5’forpitchedroofsand50’forroofstairs,theproposedprojectislimitedto+/-30’attheroofdeckand+/-40’attheroofstair,areductionof10’fromtheallowableheight.Thebuildingheightservesasatransitionfromtheadjacentapartmentbuildingson15thAveNWtotheresidentialneighborhoodalongMaryAveNW. CS3 A:EmphasizePositiveNeighborhoodAttributesTheprojecthasbeenredesignedtoincludepitchedroofsatthestreetfrontandsidelotlines,alongwithmodulationofthebuildingfootprinttorespondtotheexistingresidentialcharacter.Additionaldetailingintheformofcorbelroofsupportsalsoreferencetraditionalbuildingstyles.
PL2 SAFETYThetheprimarylivingspaceshavebeenlocatedatthestreetlevelstreetfacadewithlargeamountsofglazingtoprovide“eyesonthestreet” at Mary Ave NW.
PL3 A: ENTRIESTheeasternmostunitentriesareorientedtowardsMaryAveNW,whilethecentralentriesareorientedtowardsacourtyardbetweenthebuildings.Thewesternunitentrieshavebeenlocatedonthenorth and south to avoid facing directly onto the alley. This also activatesallsidesofthesiteforadditionalvisibility,assitesecuritywasaconcernfortheexistingneighbors.
PL3 B: RESIDENTIAL EDGESThestairpenthouseshavebeenlocatedatthecenterofeachbuildingtoreducetheperceivedmassatthebuildingperimeter.Theeastbuildinghasbeenshiftedawayfromtheexistingexceptionaltreesatthe northeast corner of the site.
PL4 B: PLANNING AHEAD FOR BICYCLISTSAspacehasbeenprovidedatthewestadjacenttothevehicleparkingwithcoveredstoragefor8bicycles.Twoshorttermspacesareprovidedintheplantingstripratherthanon-sitesotheyareavailableforpublicuse.
DC2 A: Massing B:ArchitecturalandFacadeComposition C: Secondary Architectural Features D:ScaleandTextureThebuildingheighthasbeenlimitedto29’-6”attopofroof,33’-0”attopofdeckparapetand39’-0”attopofroofstair.Theallowableheightsare40’,44’,and50’respectively.Asnotedtheroofstairshavelocatedawayfromthebuildingperimeter.Thebuildinghasbeendesignedwithsymmetricalfacadestoreflecttheinternaldesign,withsubtlevariationsbetweeneachfacade.
DC4 A: EXTERIOR ELEMENTS AND FINISHESTreatmentoftheproposedfacadesconsistsof3colorsandwoodcladding.Thecontrastingscaleofthewoodboardsandtheplankandpanelsidingprovidesvisualinterestwhileallowingvisualdistinctionatbuildingmassing.Theprimaryelementislapsiding,toreflectthehistoriccharacteroftheneighborhood.Thestreetfacingentriesarevisuallydistinguishedbymetalcanopiesandadditionalvisualinterestisprovidedbyaprojectingvolumewithapitchedroof.
DC4 B: SIGNAGE C: LIGHTING D: TREES, LANDSCAPE, AND HARDSCAPE MATERIALSAprominentaddresssignwillbelocatedatthesiteentryalongwiththemailboxesandbicycleparking.Landscapingwillcreateavisualseparationfromthestreetandrespectthelargeexistingtreesatthenortheast corner of the site.
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
4
Map URBAN VILLAGE
Urban Centers / Villages
Residential Urban Village
6/24/2019, 9:11:27 AM
No warrant ies of any sort , including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product.
0 0.08 0.160.04 mi
0 0.1 0.20.05 km
1:4,800
SDCI & Seattle IT GIS
8021 Zoning
Parcels
Zoning
Override 1
Override 2
Override 3
6/24/2019, 9:09:41 AM
No warrant ies of any sort , including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product.
0 0.02 0.040.01 mi
0 0.03 0.060.015 km
1:1,200
SDCI & Seattle IT GIS
SITE
ZON
ING
INFO
RMAT
ION ZONING
ThesiteislocatedinaLow-Rise2multi-familyzonewithintheCrownHillUrbanVillageoverlay.
CODE REFERENCESMC 23.45.510 - FAR
7567sfx1.4=10,593.8sfallowed,10,589.52sfproposedSMC 23.45.512 - Density limits
No Density Limit in LR2 ZonesSMC 23.45.514 - Structure Height
40’maximumroof,44’parapet,50’stairpenthouseSeebuildingelevationsformaxheight
SMC23.45.518-SetbacksandSeparations7’-0”avg/5’-0”minfrontreq.:7’-0”minproposed5’-0”sidereq.:5’-0”proposed7’-0”avg/5’-0”minrearreq.:27’-7”proposed
SMC23.45.522-AmenitySpace7567sfx.25=1891.75sf(945.875atgroundlevel)required950sfmingroundlevel+950minroofdeck=1900sfproposed
SMC 23.45.527 - Facade LengthFacadelength-upto65%within15’oflotline126’x.65=81.11’allowed80’-11.5”proposed
SMC23.54.015-Parking(TableB)0parkingspacesrequired-CrownHillResidentialUrbanVillage6parkingspacesproposed
S I T E
C R O W N H I L L
U R B A N V I L L A G E
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
5SDCI GIS Web Map
8/13/2019, 11:26:16 AM
No warrant ies of any sort , including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product.
0 0.15 0.30.075 mi
0 0.25 0.50.125 km
1:9,600
SDCI & Seattle IT GIS
TRAN
SPO
RTAT
IONPUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Theprojectislocatedinanareawithaccesstoseveralpublictransitrouteswithina1/4mileradius.The40,45andRapidRideDLinearebothwithin1320feetoftheprojectsite,andbothprovidetransitschedulesmeetingtheFrequentTransitrequirements.Thesiteisalsowithineasywalkingdistancetotheshopsandrestaurantsinthe15thAveNeighborhoodCommercialCorridor.
D
D
1/4 MILE RADIUS
4045 4545
40
40
18X 28X
18X
15X
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
6N
EIGH
BORH
OO
D NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION
ThesiteislocatedintheWhittierHeightsneighborhood,andisprimarilycomprisedofonestorytraditionalstylesinglefamilyresidences.TheparcelsonbothsidesofthestreetonthisblockwererecentlyrezonedtoLR2asatransitionbetweentheNC2zonetothewestandthenewRSLzonetotheeastandsouth.Themajorarterial streets are 15th Ave NW and NW 80th Street. There are severalrestaurantsandshopsineasywalkingdistance,alongwithmultipletransitoptionsincludingtheRapidRideDline.Recentdevelopmentintheareaincludesseverallargemodernapartmentbuildingsacrossthealleyon15thAveNW,whilemultiplenewtownhouseprojectswithintheblockonMaryAveNWareintheearlypermitphase.
1
11
2
12
3
13
4
14
5
15
6
16
SITE ELEVATION
MARY AVE NW FACING WEST
MARY AVE NW FACING EAST
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
7
Untitled Map Write a description for your map.
Image Landsat / Copernicus
Image Landsat / Copernicus
Image Landsat / Copernicus
SFR
SFR
SFRCHURCH
SFR
SFR
SFRSFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
1
7
17
8
18
9
19
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1110
9
8
7
6
2
4
5
3
SITE
NEI
GHBO
RHO
OD
56THAVENWPANORAMALOOKINGNORTH
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
FUTURETOWNHOUSE
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
8SI
TE S
URV
EY
TOPO
GRAP
HIC
& BO
UNDA
RY S
URVE
Y
TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY
BASIS OF BEARINGS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
VERTICAL DATUM
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
LEGEND
VICINITY MAPN.T.S.
REFERENCES
Mary
Ave N
W
STEEP SLOPE/BUFFER DISCLAIMER:
10/22/19
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
9
SITE
PLA
N
N
TREE INVENTORY
Tree#1:WesternWhitePine32”DBH/36’CSD-EXCEPTIONALTREETree#2:WesternWhitePine33”DBH/40’CSD-EXCEPTIONALTREETree#3:SilverBirch16”DBH/36’CSDTree#4:HinokiCypress12”DBH/16’CSDTree#5:WesternHemlock>30”DBH/42’CSDEXCEPTIONALTREETree#6MountainAsh7”DBH/22’CSDTree#7EnglishLaurel6”DBH/18’CSDTree#8Plum8”DBH/14’CSD
DBH=DiameteratBrestHeightCSD=CrownSpreadDiameter
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
10AM
ENIT
Y DI
AGRA
M
AMENITY DIAGRAM
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
11
LAN
DSCA
PE P
LAN
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
12FL
OO
R PL
ANS
- FIR
ST
FIRST FLOOR - EAST BUILDINGFIRST FLOOR - WEST BUILDING
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
13
SECOND FLOOR - EAST BUILDINGSECOND FLOOR - WEST BUILDING
FLO
OR
PLAN
S - S
ECO
ND
AND
THIR
D
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
14FL
OO
R PL
ANS
- RO
OF
DECK
AN
D ST
AIR
THIRD FLOOR - WEST BUILDING THIRD FLOOR - EAST BUILDING
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
15
ROOF DECK - EAST BUILDINGROOF DECK - WEST BUILDING
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
16EL
EVAT
ION
S - E
AST
BUIL
DIN
G
EAST BUILDING - EAST ELEVATION (MARY AVE NW) EAST BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATION
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
17
ELEV
ATIO
NS
- EAS
T BU
ILDI
NG
EAST BUILDING - WEST ELEVATION (COURTYARD) EAST BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATION
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
18EL
EVAT
ION
S - W
EST
BUIL
DIN
G
WEST BUILDING - EAST ELEVATION (COURTYARD) WEST BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATION
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
19
ELEV
ATIO
NS
- WES
T BU
ILDI
NG
WEST BUILDING - WEST ELEVATION (ALLEY) WEST BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATION
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
20BU
ILDI
NG
MAT
ERIA
LS
WOOD CLADDING
TRIM - COLOR 2
LAP SIDING COLOR 3
CEMENT BOARD - COLOR 1
WOOD SIDING
LARGE LAP SIDING- COLOR 3
SMALL LAP SIDING- COLOR 1
CEMENT BOARD- COLOR 1
WOOD FENCE
STREET ORIENTED ENTRY
PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
SMALL LAP SIDING- COLOR 1
LAP SIDING - COLOR 3
COLOR 3 - BLUECOLOR 2 - DARK GRAY /BLACKAT DECORATIVE TRIM
COLOR 1 - GRAY WOOD CLADDING(CEDAR OR SIM REAL WOOD)
WOOD FENCE PERMEABLE CONCRETE
SMALL LAP SIDING - COLOR 1
CEMENT BOARD - COLOR 1
WOOD CLADDING
LARGE LAP SIDING - COLOR 3
LARGE LAP SIDING - COLOR 3
SMALL LAP SIDING - COLOR 1
WOOD FENCE
WOOD CLADDINGENTRY CANOPY
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
21
PRIV
ACY-
WIN
DOW
STU
DY
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
PRIVACY PROVIDED AT GROUND FLOOR BY 6’ FENCE
WINDOW ALIGNMENT AT SOUTH FACADE UPPER STORIES LIMITED TO HIGH WINDOWS WITH SILLS AT 6’ ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR TO PROVIDE LIGHT BUT BLOCK DIRECT VIEWS BETWEEN PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT.
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
22AR
BORI
ST R
EPO
RT
Shoffner Consulting
6741 NE 182ND ST. UNIT C414 KENMORE, WA 98028 MOBILE:(206)755-9407 EMAIL: TONY@TONYSHOFFNER.COM
November 3, 2019
Pasha Afichuk 2710 S. 335th Pl. Federal Way, WA 98033
RE: Tree Inventory Report - 8027 Mary Ave. NW Seattle, WA.
Pasha:
This report is provided to address the recent inventory I conducted of the trees on the property at the address of 8027 Mary Ave. NW in Seattle, WA. I prepared an approximate tree inventory map showing the locations of the trees on the property. Two trees (#2 and #6) may not be on this property but their crowns spread onto it.
1.0 Property Conditions The property is developed with a single family residence and is located in a single family residence neighborhood. The landscape includes turfgrass, trees and shrubs. The inventory map shows the trees on the property and two that may be on the property or the adjacent lots.
2.0 Tree Inventory I conducted level 2 basic visual assessments of the 6 trees shown on the inventory map. Following is the information on these trees. The column Dbh is trunk diameter at 54” and CSD is crown spread diameter in feet. Some of these trees are multistemmed (ms) so the Dbh was determined through the City of Seattle’s formula.
# Species Dbh CSD Condition and Status 1 Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 32” 36’ Multi-trunked. Generally good
condition and health. Meets the t h r e s h o l d d i a m e t e r t o b e classified as exceptional. See protection requirements.
2 Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 33” 40’ Multi-trunked. Generally good condition and health. Meets the t h r e s h o l d d i a m e t e r t o b e classified as exceptional. See protection requirements.
3 Silver birch (Betula pendula) 16” 36’ Declining, dead terminal leaders. Not exceptional.
4 Hinoki cypress 12” 16’ Sparse crown. Appears to be declining. Not exceptional.
1
5 Western hemlock >30” 42’ Generally good condition and health. Located off-site to the n o r t h . S e e p r o t e c t i o n requirements.
6 Mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia) 7” 22’ Good condition and heatlh. Not exceptional. Not required to be retained.
7 English laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) 6” 18’ Good condition and health. Not exceptional. Not required to be retained.
8 Plum (prunus domestica) 8” 14’ Good condition and health. Not exceptional.
3.0 Tree Retention and Protecton Required The City of Seattle’s exceptional tree designation specifications and protection measures are provided in the Director’s Rule 16-2008 and SMC 25.11.
Trees #1 and #2 meet the threshold diameter to be classified as exceptional and are required to be retained and protected with the following protection measures:
• Tree protection fencing is required to be installed at the protection zone location prior to beginning any construction activities on the lot and is to remain throughout development and construction.
• No impacts are allowed within the inner root zone (IRZ), the inner half of the drip line radius distance.
• Impacts, temporary and permanent, within the outer root zone (ORZ), the outer half of the drip line distance cannot exceed 1/3 of the total area (s.f.) of the ORZ. An assessment of the impacts will be required prior to approval.
4.0 Use of This Report and Limitations This report is provided to Pasha Afichuk and Modern Homes to address the City of Seattle’s requirements for tree inventory developing lots. Natural decline and failure of trees following development is not predictable, therefore, Shoffner Consulting and Tony Shoffner cannot be held liable for retained trees that die or fail prior to or following development of the property.
Cordially,
! Tony Shoffner ISA Certified Arborist #PN-0909A TRAQ
2
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
23
EXCE
PTIO
NAL
TRE
E EN
CRO
ACHM
ENT
DIAG
RAM
N
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
24M
HA D
IAGR
AMS
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA
3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
25
MHA
CLC
ULA
TIO
NS
MHA AREA TOTALS:
A 59.938B 1550.306C 59.938D 17.625E 481.824F 153.125G 880.510H 59.938I 1550.306J 59.938K 17.625L 481.824M 153.125N 475.368O 154.882P 100.898Q 154.882R 59.938S 1550.306T 59.938U 17.625V 481.824W 153.125X 475.368Y 154.882Z 100.898AA 154.882BB 21.250CC 294.328DD 21.250EE 23.500FF 269.042GG 23.500
TOTAL 10273.708
MHA-R PAYMENT OPTION SUMMARY TABLE
1 ZONE LR2 (M1)
2MHA DESIGNATION PER MAP A OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN, SM-SLU, AND SM-U 85 ZONES MEDIUM
3 ASSOCIATED PUDA WITH MHA-R REQUIREMENTS? NO
4TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AND LIVE-WORK UNITS IN THE STRUCTURE/DEVELOPMENT 2 TOWNHOUSES
5 GROSS FLOOR AREA - RESIDENTIAL UNITS 10273.7086 GROSS FLOOR AREA - LIVE WORK UNITS 0
7GROSS FLOOR AREA IN RESIDENTIAL OR LIVE WORK USE EXCLUDED FROM MHA-R PAYMENT 0
8 FLOOR ARE FOR MHA-R CALCULATION 10273.708
9PAYMENT CALCULATION AMOUNT PER CODE (ADJUSTED FOR CHANGE IN CPI) OR PUDA $21.83
10 MHA-R PAYMENT PROVIDED $224,275.05
NOTE: MHA floor area includes common walls between townhouse units, which are exempt from FAR calculations.
DESIGN GUIDANCE PROPOSAL8027 MARY AVE NW, SEATTLE WA3035463-EG| FEBRUARY 6, 2020
26CO
MM
UN
ITY
OU
TREA
CH S
UM
MAR
Y
8015 & 8027 Mary Ave NW Projects Required Early Outreach Documentation
Combined Early Outreach for:
- SDCI# 3035451-EG: 8015 Mary Ave NW, Seattle, WA 98117 - SDCI# 3035463-EG: 8027 Mary Ave NW, Seattle, WA 98117
OUTREACH PLAN REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION: The outreach plan for this project included posters, a project hotline and a community meeting: 1 – Printed outreach: Posters posted in local vicinity (high impact method)
- Date posted: 10/23/19 (minimum 14 days prior to community meeting) - Posted in businesses where possible, but otherwise posted on telephone poles - See Addendum A for documentation materials
2 – Electronic / Digital outreach: Project hotline phone number (high impact method) – 360-670-0486
- Date set up: 10/23/19 (minimum 21 days, will be closed down on 11/14/19) - Advertised on poster and ECODR Calendar - See Addendum B for documentation materials
3 – In-Person Outreach: Community Meeting (high impact method)
- Date of meeting: 11/7/19, 6:45-7:45pm, at the Ballard Public Library - Advertised on poster and ECODR Calendar - See Addendum C for documentation materials
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY FEEDBACK: “A brief summary of what was heard from the community when conducting outreach” There was only a little bit of feedback; no feedback through the project hotline or email, and most of the conversation at the community meeting was more Q&A than feedback (community meeting notes are scanned at the end of this document). The couple of minor feedback comments were:
- They liked the pitched roof façade better than flat roof façade - Encouraged the general facades of these two projects along with the third project that is between these two
projects (which the same architect and builder are developing) to have consistency, although not be exactly the same – something that feels consistent with eachother and the rest of the “character” of the neighborhood
- Talked a bit about construction traffic and how the alley is pretty busy