Phalangeal Osteosarcoma Mistaken for Tuberculosis: A Case ... · Phalangeal osteosarcoma,...

Post on 17-Jan-2020

23 views 0 download

Transcript of Phalangeal Osteosarcoma Mistaken for Tuberculosis: A Case ... · Phalangeal osteosarcoma,...

38

ABSTRACTWe report a 21-year old female patient who presented withan 18-month history of a swelling in the distal phalanx ofher right little finger. Although the history, clinical featuresand MRI were suggestive of a benign tumour or atuberculous lesion, the histo-pathological examination of theswelling was reported as a conventional osteosarcoma.Osteosarcoma of the hand is very rare. This article highlightsthe possibility of a seemingly benign lesion seen in a routineclinic could well turn out to be malignant, and the need tomaintain a high index of suspicion.

Key Words: Phalangeal osteosarcoma, osteosarcoma of the hand

INTRODUCTIONOsteosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcomatypically originating from the metaphysis of long bones. Ithas a peak incidence at the age of 15-19 years with a hightendency for systemic spread 1. The incidence ofosteosarcoma of the hand has been reported to be between0.18% - 0.39% of all skeletal osteosarcomas 2. We report arare presentation of osteosarcoma of the distal phalanx andits diagnosis and treatment.

CASE REPORTA 21-year old Vietnamese female patient presented withan eighteen-month history of a right little finger swellingassociated with increasing pain. She had no fever, loss ofweight or loss of appetite.

She had a small firm swelling measuring 1x1 cm2 on thedorso-lateral aspect of the distal phalanx of the right littlefinger (Fig. 1). It was tender to touch, with no signs ofinflammation. Range of movement of the distalinterphalangeal joint was normal. She had no epitrochlear oraxillary lymphadenopathy.

Radiographs revealed a cystic lesion within the distalphalanx of the little finger (Fig. 2). MRI was reported asshowing a solid and enhancing osseous lesion with an extra-osseous component with benign features, most likelytuberculosis (Fig. 3). Chest radiographs were normal.Mantoux test was negative for active tuberculosis and ESRwas 30mm/hr.

Our diagnosis of tuberculosis was based solely on the MRIfindings as her history and physical findings wereunremarkable.

Curettage was performed under local anaesthesia to confirmtuberculosis. However, to our surprise, the biopsy reportedconventional osteosarcoma (Fig 4). The biopsy sectionshowed fragments of lesional tissue composed of a mixtureof epithelioid cells, ovoid cells and spindle shaped cells withscattered non-neoplastic giant cells. Some tumor cells hadhyperchromatic nuclei while others had vesicular nuclei withprominent nucleoli. A few mitotic figures were seen andsome atypical forms were present. There was ample bonetrabeculae with jagged edges and malignant lace-like osteoiddeposition. No necrosis or granuloma was present.

A full physical examination did not reveal any possibleprimary tumours. The patient declined chemotherapy and awork-up for staging due to financial difficulties. Weproceeded with amputation of the right little finger at thelevel of the middle phalanx. The histopathology reportshowed the margins to be clear with no residual tumor at theaffected distal phalanx. Apart from a mild surgical siteinfection which resolved rapidly, she recovered uneventfully.

DISCUSSIONFowble in 2005, reviewed 41 cases of osteosarcoma of thehand reported in 39 patients 3. Eight of these cases had factorsassociated with osteosarcoma such as: Paget’s disease,radiation exposure and metastasis. Histologic evaluation wasequivocal for the subtypes of osteosarcoma: fibroblastic,

Phalangeal Osteosarcoma Mistaken for Tuberculosis: ACase Report

MA Mohd-Ariff, MS Orth, I Ali-Noor, MS Orth, AG Paul, MS Orth, S Abdullah, MS Orth

Department of Orthopaedics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Date of submission: November 2014Date of acceptance: February 2015

Corresponding Author: Shalimar Abdullah, Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, PPUKM, Jalan Yaakob Latiff, Cheras, 56000Kuala LumpurEmail: kelapa44@yahoo.com

Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1503.011

Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2015 Vol 9 No 1 MA Mohd-Ariff, et al

11-B110_OA1 4/9/15 11:03 PM Page 38

Phalangeal Sarcoma

39

osteoblastic, chondroblastic, parosteal and periosteal. Agerange was between 13 months and 85 years (average 43.3years, median 40 years). Pain and swelling were the mostcommon presentations similar to our patient. There was apredilection for the metacarpo-phalangeal joints with thesecond metacarpal head being the commonest site ofinvolvement. This correlates with the most active bonegrowth site in the hand.

On the contrary, Kerin 4 reviewed 123 cases of metastatictumours of the hand and reported the more distal sites (i.e.terminal phalanges) were more often involved. Our patient’spresentation of idiopathic osteosarcoma arising solely in thedistal phalanx is rare. There was a possibility that this couldbe a multifocal or multicentric osteosarcoma. However, ourpatient declined further investigations, hence we were unableto detect a possible primary tumour elsewhere. A bone scanin our patient may have allowed us to elucidate the cause ofher terminal phalanx involvement.

Fig. 1: Painful right little finger swelling over the distal phalanx. Fig. 2: Plain radiograph with a well demarcated lytic lesion overthe affected distal phalanx.

Fig. 3: MRI revealing a lesion over the distal phalanx reportedas a solid and enhancing osseous lesion with an extra-osseous component with benign features, most likelytuberculosis. Histopathological examination, however,was reported as osteosarcoma.

Fig. 4: HPE slide showing osteoid formation seen (blue arrow)between malignant cells which are polyglonal andspindle shaped (yellow arrow).

11-B110_OA1 4/9/15 11:03 PM Page 39

Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2015 Vol 9 No 1 MA Mohd-Ariff, et al

40

REFERENCES

1. Honoki K, Miyauchi Y, Yajima H, Takakura Y, Tamai S. Primary osteogenic sarcoma of a finger proximal phalanx: a case reportand literature review. J Hand Surg [Am] 2001. 26: 1151-6.

2. Okada K, Wold LE, Beabout JW, Shives TC. Osteosarcoma of the hand: A clinicopathologic study of 12 cases. Cancer. 1993; 72:719-25.

3. Fowble VA, Pae R, Vitale A, Bryk E, Vigorita VJ. Osteosarcoma of the hand.One case and a literature review. Clin Orthop RelRes. 2005; 440: 255-61.

4. Kerin R. Metastatic tumors of the hand. A review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983; 65A: 1331-5.5. Amstutz HC. Multiple osteogenic sarcomata: Metastatic or multi-centric? Cancer. 1969; 24: 923-31.

There are no known associated patient risk factors fordeveloping this rare tumour.

Conventional osteosarcoma is a grade by itself denoting ahigh-grade tumour.

The usual MRI findings in osteosarcoma of tubular bones aresimilar to those of long bones with aggressive lesions,cortical destruction and periosteal reaction, together withabnormal marrow signal intensity and peritumoral edema. Itwas the absence of these features in our patient’s MRI, whichled us to a conclusion of a benign lesion. Osteosarcoma andtuberculosis have similar radiographic findings and extravigilance with tuberculosis is in order as it is well known asthe great mimic.

Evaluation and treatment of osteosarcoma of the phalanxshould be similar to osteosarcoma of the long bones.Evaluation and treatment of conventional osteosarcoma ofthe fingers is amputation similar to long bones. Salvage wasnot an option as we had unknowingly performed curettageon a malignant lesion thus preventing us from obtaining cleartumour margins for such procedures. Chemotherapy and

staging is indicated for osteosarcoma but the patientdeclined due to financial issues. Patients require CTevaluation of the thorax and abdomen and a bone scan,followed by the appropriate surgery and chemotherapy.Those with wide and radical margins had no localrecurrence, but those with marginal excision had aconsiderably high recurrence rate5. In our patient, a definitivewide margin was achieved (amputation through the middlephalanx). Retrospectively, a high index of suspicion forosteosarcoma is needed for accurate diagnosis and promptand proper treatment.

CONCLUSIONWe missed the diagnosis of osteosarcoma as our initialdiagnosis of tuberculosis was based on the benign featuresof the patient’s physical examination findings and the MRIreport and the increased risk of having come from atuberculosis endemic area. A constant awareness forunusual lesions in unusual locations is important so thatproper and prompt treatment can be provided for ourpatients.

11-B110_OA1 4/9/15 11:03 PM Page 40