Post on 01-Apr-2016
description
NPS Report
July 2014(July 1st - July 27th)
TMP
National NPS
TLP
National NPS
OVERALL Inferences & Suggestions...● Response Rate: The response rate is next to nothing in TMP and TLP programmes
Solutions: - Make sure they are aware of these surveys
- Set expectations that these surveys need to be filled
- Remind members and team leaders about the surveys (Sent out post completion of the role)
● Clarity: Clarity was something that is lacking for most of the responses. Ensure clarity of: - Job description
- The ‘Why’ of the organization and their role in it
- The RoI of each thing they do (specially things like conferences, etc)
- Make sure there is transition for each and every role (TMP & TLP)
- Adjust national resources to your local reality
● End Date of TLP TMP experiences: Make sure you’re putting down the right date for the end of the TLP experience so that members don’t randomly get the survey way before or after ending that particular AIESEC experience.
● Note: The reason why some LCs have more TL surveys sent out than the actual number of people in the LCs (in some cases) is because they were probably assigned multiple TL positions on myaiesec.net
LC NPSTMP/TLP
*Note - If one program or both programs are not listed for an LC, there were no surveys sent for them this month
Appalachian (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement1. Individual responsibility & goals2. Support from AIESEC throughout
the experience
7% Response Rate
Appalachian (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement1. Clarity of AIESEC vision and your
contribution towards it2. Individual responsibility & goals3. Education for role
8% Response Rate
Arizona State (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Arizona State (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
7% Response Rate
Austin (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Austin (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
7% Response Rate
Baruch (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
9% Response Rate
Baruch (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
17% Response Rate
Chapel Hill (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
17% Response Rate
Chapel Hill (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
8% Response Rate
Colorado (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
50% Response Rate
Colorado (TLP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Cornell (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
7% Response Rate
Cornell (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
6% Response Rate
Dallas (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
5% Response Rate
Dallas (TLP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Eau Claire (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Eau Claire (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
11% Response Rate
UGA (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
5% Response Rate
UGA (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
8% Response Rate
Georgia State (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Georgia State (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
3% Response Rate
Georgia Tech (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
14% Response Rate
Georgia Tech (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
5% Response Rate
Houston (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Houston (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
9% Response Rate
Illinois (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
6% Response Rate
Illinois (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
12% Response Rate
Madison (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
11% Response Rate
Madison (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
7% Response Rate
Miami (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
4% Response Rate
Miami (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
10% Response Rate
Michigan (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
14% Response Rate
Michigan (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
4% Response Rate
Northern Illinois (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Northern Illinois (TLP)Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
20% Response Rate
Northwestern (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
3% Response Rate
Northwestern (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
3% Response Rate
Ohio State (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
Ohio State (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
22% Response Rate
Purdue (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
4% Response Rate
Purdue (TLP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
San Jose (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
San Jose (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement1. Education for the role2. Support from AIESEC throughout
the experience3. Professional development through
the experience
5% Response Rate
SLO (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
17% Response Rate
SLO (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
15% Response Rate
Seattle (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
6% Response Rate
Seattle (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement1. Collaborative learning environment2. Induction and transition to the role
8% Response Rate
Texas A&M (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
25% Response Rate
Texas A&M (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
13% Response Rate
DC (TMP)
No responses for July
0% Response Rate
DC (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
9% Response Rate
Yale (TMP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No areas chosen
Top Areas for Improvement● No detractors or passives for July
3% Response Rate
Yale (TLP) Top Areas of Satisfaction● No promoters for July
Top Areas for Improvement● No areas chosen
2% Response Rate