Post on 02-Nov-2020
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card1
Critique Paper
“Department of Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Southern Mississippi,
Bachelor of Liberal Studies” Rack Card
Danielle Kellum
The University of Southern Mississippi
IT 567
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card2
Fall 2016
Design Evaluation
Overview
The critique item is an information rack card for the Department of Interdisciplinary
Studies at The University of Southern Mississippi. The information card is designed to promote
the Bachelor of Liberal Studies major. This
card is used as a recruitment tool within the
department and the university. The card
contains text and graphic information on
what is required to pursue a Bachelor Degree
in Liberal Studies. The rack card is various
shades of blue with white lettering across the
top as a title and main heading. The white
lettering is with black drop shading. The
subheading and body of the work are bold
black lettering. Italicized script is also used
sparingly. The font type varies. The graphics
are composed of test tubes, a globe,
stethoscope, and portraits. These are
dispersed on the front page in a cantilevered grid pattern. On the reverse side across the top is a
graphic of giraffes. On the bottom back is the academic logo for The University of Southern
Mississippi. The subheading subjects in the middle of the card are divided with thin solid black
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card3
lines. Different graphic design principles are used to produce this rack card design. These include
contrast, repetition, alignment, and proximity.
Contrast, Repetition, Alignment, and Proximity
Contrast is the use of two elements that are similar in nature. One font in two very
different sizes, two different fonts, a fat and thin space, or thick and thin lines are all indicative
of contrast. Scaling an object to be larger or smaller than the surrounding elements creates
contract. It is important to make sure the element does not become disproportionate however
(Lupton & Phillips, 2008, p. 50). Even the use of color can emphasize contrast. Contrast is not
to be confused with the use of two similar objects. Contrast works only because of the strong
variations between the two elements (Williams, pg. 65). The rack card uses contrast to highlight
different sections of the card. White lettering in two different sizes heads the top of the rack card.
This is followed by very definitive sections divided by a diagonal line. The information on the
card is set up with bold headings in a block style. These sections use a larger heavier font for the
main headings which helps separate the different elements.
Repetition is the repeating of various elements throughout the page to make the concept
more cohesive (Williams, 2008, p. 51). Consistency is the key. A consistent use of font styles
provides the reader with visual clues. A bold sub-titles with a lighter font for the body, provides
repetition. As with the use of fonts, consistency and repetition alert the reader that elements
belong in the same publication (Brady, 1993, p. 6). There are several ways to use repetition. In
addition to font styles, another way is to use a repeated shape. The element repeats elsewhere
within the design helping to create unity. The card has pictures of beakers, a globe, and a
stethoscope. All of these have circular shapes to them. These are placed at the top (beakers),
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card4
middle left (globe), and lower right (stethoscope) of the page. The repetition of the shapes
throughout the page creates unity within the design (Clayton & Hashimoto, 2009, p. 33).
The bottom front of the card is divided into three sections, each containing a picture.
These are sectioned off with a moderately heavy line forming a border around each photograph.
This creates a repetition of picture frames for each photograph.
Alignment is the connection each element has with the next. This is done to provide a
clean neat visual effect for the elements on the page. If the items are arbitrarily placed, the design
will have a chaotic and disorganized look (Williams, 2008, p. 33). According to Graver and Jura
(2012, p. 46) grid lines can help align items from one section to the next in a design although it is
not necessary to use a grid pattern exclusively. It is not necessary for the grid to even show as it
does in the rack card.
On the front the major heading are flush left. The text outlines the globe and is
cantilevered within the tilted grid on the front. This makes the text slowly angle to the bottom
right of the card. The rack card text is aligned flush left on the back of the card. This gives a
neater appearance than the layout on the front of the card. The alignment of the front and the
back of the rack card are visually different. The front of the card, while aligned, gives the
appearance of being more fluid. The back is more ridged and formal.
Proximity is all about gathering similar or related elements together into a cohesive group
(Williams, 2008, p. 15). Spacing around a group of objects signals to the reader that these items
belong together (Brady, 1993, p. 31). The rack card has done this by utilizing space before the
sub-headings and after the body of each section. These sections are further broken up by lines.
On the front of the card a wider grid is used. On the back thin lines separate each sup-heading.
On the front bottom, the photographs are bordered by a dark line further separating the pictures.
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card5
A grid can be used to give the composition repetition and unit (Graver & Jura, 2012, p.
12). It can also be used as a mode to group like items. By turning the grid lines at an angle to the
page creates excitement as well as keeping the information organized (Clayton & Hashimoto,
2009, p. 46).
The graphics relate to each other and the subject of the card itself. This relationship pulls
the different elements together with proximity and the theme. The card is for a degree in Liberal
Studies. The graphics all have to do with the different subjects that can make up this degree.
There are the various sciences from psychology and biology to literature and political science.
Color and Typography
Color and type can enhance the design. The use of color can create contrast within the
design as well as establishing repetition and proximity. The card employs a monochromatic
color scheme of blues utilizing various tints and shades. This creates contrast throughout the card
with the darker shades being used for the grid and graphics, while the lighter tints are used for
the background. According to Brady (1988, p.3), using dark or black letters on a dusky
background are badly used signals. In this case a signal is an element that indicates something is
about to happen. An indentation at the beginning of a paragraph as well as the period at the end
of a sentence are all signals. In the case of the rack card the white lettering on the light blue
background is a bad signal because there is not enough contrast between the two. The readability
of the top titles is affected by choosing a white typeface with a dark drop shadow. The problem
is compounded with the use of the light background. The readability gets better with the black
font on the light background.
The university uses three different font families, two of which are used in the card. There
are other fonts used as well. The three fonts families are Ariel, Futura, and ACaslon ("University
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card6
style guide," 2016). The card uses a Futura font for the sub-headers and body. The main headings
utilize an ACaslon regular font with a stylized L. There is a Brush Script font used across the
middle front section of the card. The title uses a font similar to the Copperplate Gothic Bold with
a drop shadow. This font is with a black drop shadow.
Suggestions for Improvement
This card is used for recruitment. As such, it should be a good first impression. The card
has some drawbacks to reaching that goal. The card itself has a fairly good layout. It meets the
requirement of contrast with the different shades, tones, and tints of the blue color that are used.
The weight of the font changes throughout the card. This gives the different sections of the text
repetition and a visual ease of alignment. However, the use of the light font, at the top of the first
page, combined with the lightness of the background make reading the information hard. This
section would have been better if the background had been darkened or the picture changed. The
font could have been darkened or moved down or put elsewhere.
The use of the graphics is understandable given this is a recruitment card for a liberal
studies program. There is some issue with the choice of the photographs utilized on the bottom
of the front of the card. It took some time to figure out who these people where and what the
relationship was to the card. With a lot of digging it was determined to be Freud, Poe, and Alice
Walker, who is a civil rights activist. The older generation would have been able to figure out the
photographs given time, but the younger generation would have problems. It would have been
better to either forgo the photographs or use some other identifying graphics to signal the degree
program. The subtlety of the card relationships was not caught immediately.
The back of the card does not suffer as much as the front. However, at the top of the page
there is the issue of the lighter font against a light background. The font should be darkened
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card7
considerably to make it easier to read or put elsewhere on the top, possibly over the “Bachelor of
Liberal Studies” on the black background.
References
Brady, P. (1993). Using type right: 121 basic no-nonsense rules for working with type.
Lincolnwood, Ill: NTC Contemporary.
Clayton, M., & Hashimoto, A. (2009). Visual design fundamentals: A digital approach (3).
Boston, US: Charles River Media / Cengage Learning.
Graver, A., & Jura, B. (2012). Best practices for graphic designers, grids and page layouts : An
essential guide for understanding and applying page design principles. Osceola, US:
Rockport Publishers.
Lupton, E., & Phillips, J.C. (2008). Graphic design : The new basics. New York, US: Princeton
Architectural Press.
University style guide. (2016). Retrieved October 31, 2016, from
https://www.usm.edu/university-communications/writing#style-gulde
Williams, R. (2008). The non-designer's design book (3rd ed.). Berkeley: PeachPit.
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card8
running head: Critique Paper Department of Interdisciplinary Studies Rack Card9