Post on 16-Jan-2016
History of Phosphorus in North Carolina
Dr. Eugene KamprathProfessor Emeritus
North Carolina Statue University
SERA 6 MeetingJune 20, 2011
North Carolina Soils Mountain, Piedmont, Coastal Plain
Norfolk- Coastal Plain Soil
fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic KandiudultCecil / Georgeville- Piedmont Soils
fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult
Phosphorus• Soils initially low in P
• Cultivated soils – buildup of P
• Piedmont soils– High buffer capacity
• Coastal plain soils– Low buffer capacity
Soil Form P
----lbs/ac----Norfolk Al-P 188
Fe-P 88
Ca-P 68
Org-P 132
Georgeville Al-P 100
Fe-P 333
Ca-P 44
Org-P 164
Forms of P in NC Soils
Yield (%) of Check Plots Compared to Fertilized Plots related to STP
Corn Yield Increase to 22 lbs P / acre- Coastal Plain Soils
Truog P- ppm P % Uptake from Days after Planting
29 Days 86 Days 102 Days
---------------------------%----------------------------
15 52 17
35 16 7
P32 Studies with Corn
P rate = 18 lbs / acre banded Nelson et al., 1948
Acid % P32 Extracted
Al-P Fe-P
HCL 33 8
H2SO4 39 16
Effect of Anion on P Extraction
Seatz, 1949, Ph.D Thesis, NCSU
Mehlich 1 (Double Acid)• 0.05 N HCl + 0.025 N H2SO4
• Addition of SO4 increased extraction of P from Al and FePO4
– (Seatz 1949 Ph.D. thesis- NCSU)
• Suitable for soils in the southeastern US
• Introduced in 1949
Critical M1P Levels for Cecil and Norfolk Soils
Critical M1P for Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Mountain Soils
P Rate Needed to Change M1Pas Influenced by Clay
Critical M1P Level 3 Piedmont Ultisols
Piedmont – P Relationships
• Al-P converted to Fe-P, rapid rate first 3 years after application
• M1-P highly correlated with Al-P
• Rapid decrease in M1-P first 2 years after application, followed by much slower rate of decrease
• M1-P critical level for wheat, 8 – 10 ppm
Shelton, 1960 Ph.D Thesis, NCSUShelton & Coleman, 1960
Residual P – Georgeville Soil Initial P Application
(1956)M1P
(1964)Corn Yield
(1964)
---lbs/acre--- ---ppm--- Annual P- lb /acre
0 22
---bushels / acre---
0 1 27 92
150 2 64 100
300 4 89 110
600 11 114 115
Kamprath, 1967
Tidewater Research Station
P Management on Portsmouth Soil
• M1-P critical level for corn / soybean, 22 ppm– Long term study 1955 – 1985
• Annual band application of 16 kg/ ha (equal to P removal in grain) maintained critical level
• No yield advantage to keeping soil test above critical level • M1-P of 100 ppm supplies adequate P for 14 – 16 yrs.
McCollum, 1991
Effect of P Application on Soil Solution P
Effect of P Application on Soil Solution P
100 % Phosphorus Saturation
Soil M1P M3P
-----------ppm-----------
Coastal Plain sandy soils 165 (275)
Piedmont clayey soils (335) 470
Change in M1P in 3 Ulitsols14-Year Cropping with 0 P Applied
Effect of P Rate on M1P
Effect of P Rate on M1P
Mehlich 3 Extractant
• NH4F, HOAc, NH4NO3, HNO3, EDTA
• pH 2.5
• Introduced in 1981
• Extracts 1.5 – 2 times more P than M1P
Critical Levels Coastal Plain• Greenhouse millet
– Norfolk M1P = 31 ppm
• Field– Portsmouth corn M1P = 22 ppm– Norfolk corn M1P = 25 ppm M3P = 55 ppm– Portsmouth corn M3P = 43 ppm
wheat M3P = 64 ppmsoybean M3P = 50 ppm
– Goldsboro soybean M3P = 40 ppm
Critical Levels Piedmont
• Greenhouse millet– Cecil M1P = 16 ppm– Cecil, Davidson, Georgeville M1P = 12 ppm
• Field– Davidson, corn & soybean
• M1P = 6 – 8 ppm M3P = 10 – 13 ppm
– Georgeville• Corn M1P = 8 ppm• Wheat M1P = 8 ppm
P Management
• CP soil with initial M1P of 105 ppm after 14 years cropping had M1P of 60 ppm & M3P of 120 ppm – high soil test P
• CP soil with initial M1P of 50 ppm supplied adequate P for 13 years, 17 kg P/ha/yr harvested
• Piedmont soil with initial M1P of 10 ppm supplied adequate P for 12 years
• Annual P rate of 20 kg P/ha maintains critical level
M3P Soil Test Levels over Time
1990 2000 2010
SoilLevel Tob. Corn Pasture Tob. Corn Pasture Tob. Corn Pasture
----------------------------------------% of samples--------------------------------------------
High 23 31 21 21 37 19 23 35 17
V. High 63 32 27 70 37 53 62 35 57
Effect of Clay Content on M3P
P Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT)
• Environmental regulation and P loss today
• Mehlich 3 P now used as an input for this
• Historical research and data important in making decisions about PLAT and P management today