HFT Project Overview

CD0 Review

H.G. RitterLBNL

CD0 Review 2

Compelling science

•Elementary charm cross-sections

•Parton energy loss•Charm flow and thermalization

CD0 Review 3

Justification

• In the first part we have shown– Compelling science– Proposed detector can do necessary

measurements• In the second part we will show

– Properties of detector– How we build it– We have the team and the organization

to build it

CD0 Review 4

Major Milestones• List all the previous reviews

CD0 Review 5

Definition

STAR Tracking Upgrade to identify D and B mesons through measurement of the displaced vertex

CD0 Review 6

Optimal technology

• New pixel technology– Resolution– Low material budget

• Proven strip technology– Experience– Cost effective

CD0 Review 7

PIXEL

• 2 layers of 30x30 m pixels at 2.5 and 8 cm radius

• Very thin material budget to limit multiple scattering

• Data reduction and formatting on chip

• Rapid insertion and removal• Precision positioning• Air cooling

CD0 Review 8

PIXEL

CD0 Review 9

Patch for run 11

CD0 Review 10

IST

• One layer of single sided strips (pads) at a radius of 14 cm

• Conventional and proven technology

• MIT expertise

CD0 Review 11

IST

CD0 Review 12

SSD• Existing detector• Needs upgrade and TLC

CD0 Review 13

Collaboration• BNL: C. Chasman, D. Beavis, R. Debbe, J.H. Lee, M.J. Levine, F.

Videbaek, Z. Xu• UCLA: R. Cendejas, H. Huang, S. Sakai, C. Whitten• Kent State: J. Joseph, D. Keane, S. Margetis, V. Rykov, W.M.

Zhang• Prague: M. Bystersky, J. Kapitan, V. Kushpil, M. Sumbera • Strasbourg: J. Baudot, C. Hu-Guo, A. Shabetai, M. Szelezniak,

M. Winter• MIT: J. Kelsey, R. Milner, M. Plesko, R. Redwine, F. Simon, B.

Surrow, G. Van Nieuwenhuizen• LBNL: E. Anderssen, X. Dong, L. Greiner, H.S. Matis, S. Morgan,

H.G. Ritter, A. Rose, E. Sichtermann, R.P. Singh, T. Stezelberger, X. Sun, J.H. Thomas, V. Tram, C. Vu, H.H. Wieman, N. Xu

• Purdue: A. Hirsch, B. Srivastava, F. Wang, W. Xie• U. Washington: H. Bichsel

CD0 Review 14

Management Structure

DOEBNLLBNL

HFT Project ManagementContract Project Manager: HG Ritter (acting) LBNLDeputy, Contract Project Manager: RP Singh LBNL

Deputy, Contract Project Manager: F. Videbaek BNL

Pixel Det.

Wieman LBNL

Anderssen LBNL

IST

B. Surrow MIT

J. Kelsey MIT

Integration

F. Videbaek BNL

J. Kelsey MIT

Software

S. Margetis KSU

STARSpokesperson: T. HallmanUpgrade coord: R. Majka

SSD Liaison

J. Thomas LBNL

Safety CoordinatorTBD

HFT Management Structure

CD0 Review 15

HFT Technical Committee

Ritter - Project ManagerSingh - Deputy Project ManagerMorgan - BudgetVidebaek - IntegrationWieman - PixelAnderssen - Pixel, IntegrationSurrow - ISTKelsey - IST, IntegrationThomas - SSD LiaisonMargetis - SoftwareHallman - STARMajka - STAR

Weekly meetings, change control

CD0 Review 16

Risk Management• APS Sensor depending on Strasbourg pace of

development– Push for early prototype, get involved in

testing and design• Kinematic mount and low weight ladder

challenging– Solve problem in the R+D phase

• SSD is essential– Get involved in upgrade and running of SSD,

design some redundancy into IST• HFT might become operational late

– Build patch to test design and get early measurement

CD0 Review 17

CostWBS Title

Total Budget

Upper Range

1.1 R&D 1,461 1,461

1.2 Pixel Detector 1,963 2,869

1.3 Strip Detector (IST) 2,287 3,112

1.4 Integration 1,662 2,357

1.5 Software 0 0

1.6 Project Management 785 941  Subtotal 8,157 10,741  Contingency - 30% 2,914 4,079  HFT Est. TPC 11,071 14,821

CD0 Review 18

Proposed Schedule

CD0 Review 19

Summary• Compelling Science• A detector

– That can deliver the science– Has the right mix of new and

proven technology • A team and an organization

– That can build the detector– That will extract the science in a

timely fashion