Post on 30-Dec-2015
Energy Business Solutions
Fleet Performance and Reliability in Generation Utilitiesbased on Energy Management Suite - PowerPortal SAP for Utilities 2008, San Antonio, Texas, October 27, 2008
Dr. Jörn Rassow, EnBWRodney Lord, SIEMENS
Siemens IT Solutions for Energy
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 2R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008, North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Energy Management Suite PowerPortal@EnBW
Agenda
Realised Project from Clients View
Solution architecture
Project information
Project results & Outlook
Motivation
Company profile
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 3R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008, North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
EnBW AG- Organizational & production structure
EnBW AG
Generation Trading Sales Transmission Service
EnBW Kraftwerke AG
Iller-KW
Heilbronn
MarbachStuttgart
Karlsruhe
Philippsburg
Baden-Baden
Forbach
Freiburg
Neckarwestheim
ObrigheimBexbach(Saarland)
Cattenom (F) Mannheim
Lippendorf(Sachsen)
EnAlpin Wallis (CH)
Fessenheim (F)
Sellrain-Silz (A)
Obere Donau-KW
Neckar-KW
Rheinkraftwerke
Gambsheim(CERGA)
Hochrhein-kraftwerke
Schluchsee-KW
Vorarlberger Illwerke (A)
Walheim
Altbach
Glems
Iffezheim (RKI)
Hotzenwald-KW
Ulm
EnBW-KraftwerkGemeinschafts-,Vertragskraftwerk
Kernkraftwerk
Fossil befeuertes Kraftwerk
Wasserkraftwerk
Basel
Straßburg
Bregenz
Iller-KW
Heilbronn
MarbachStuttgart
Karlsruhe
Philippsburg
Baden-Baden
Forbach
Freiburg
Neckarwestheim
ObrigheimBexbach(Saarland)
Cattenom (F) Mannheim
Lippendorf(Sachsen)
EnAlpin Wallis (CH)
Fessenheim (F)
Sellrain-Silz (A)
Obere Donau-KW
Neckar-KW
Rheinkraftwerke
Gambsheim(CERGA)
Hochrhein-kraftwerke
Schluchsee-KW
Vorarlberger Illwerke (A)
Walheim
Altbach
Glems
Iffezheim (RKI)
Hotzenwald-KW
Ulm
EnBW-KraftwerkGemeinschafts-,Vertragskraftwerk
Kernkraftwerk
Fossil befeuertes Kraftwerk
Wasserkraftwerk
Basel
Straßburg
Bregenz
nuclear
hydro-electrical
fossilcontractual
~ 12.000 MW
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 4R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008, North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Motivation- Needs for a innovative Information Platform
+
+
1998 … 2003
Merger of grid operating companies with local utilities and municipal utility
Start of de-regulation of the german energy market
Consequences / changes for EnBW:
Re-orientation in the new market situation new company organization new tasks / organizational company structures of group companies
… the implementation of a unified reporting based on the existing inhomogeneous information platform … the unification of business processes
Requirements for EnBW Kraftwerke:
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 5R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008, North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
SAP Enterprise PortalSAP Enterprise Portal
SIEMENS CockpitSIEMENS Cockpit
Role-based portal content structure
Data storage
Calculations
PowerPortalPowerPortal
Adapter
Adapter Adapter
Displays Data model
I & CDatabaseLoB
iViewiView
iView
Record set Time series / VTQ-Values
Adapter
Record set
XML-files
Event-driven communication
Adapter
Record set
Solution architecture - innovative system structure
Alarming & Notification
ERP
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 6R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008, North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Solution architecture - secure plant system environment
HQSiemens Cockpit
SAP EP
t
Bac
ken
d s
yste
m lo
ad
Stabile system operation and high performanceStabile system operation and high performance
Pre-defined update cycle
DCSProcess data
archive
No. of users : >> 100 !
tB
ack
en
d s
yste
m lo
ad
Plantlocation
Maximum system load
System load
no Risk of instable system behavior caused by users!
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 7R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Course of the Project „PowerPortal for conventional Power plants“
June 2004 Start feasibility study (requirements analysis)
July 2005 Contract placement Phase 1 (Pilot: Karlsruhe/HQ)
April 2006 Phase 2
March 2007 Engineering, commissioning, testing period
May 2007 Final acceptance
~Aug 2007 User driven optimization
Decision: implementation of PowerPortal for EnBW’s conventional power plants in- Altbach,- Heilbronn, Marbach, Walheim,- Karlsruhe,- Stuttgart-Münster, Stuttgart-Gaisburg and- Central service / HQ
Visualization of technical and commercial information
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 8R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Process descriptionStructured representation and documentation:
Scope on all major processes
Determination of users
Description of tasks and targets
Determination of data sources and IT-systems
Data structure
Page design (Layout, tables, …)
Navigational structure
Data provider
Business rolesDetermination of update cycles
3-step Process analytics
1. Analysis of present state (Bottom-Up)
2. Analysis of location-based differences
3. Cross-check: Top-Down analytics based on EnBW process model
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Project Approach
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 9R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Pro
cess
Data elements
Modeling
Design of a company-wide data model
Samples: Current value15-min average value1-h average value1-h flowing average valuePrecision: Measurement/CounterRaw value, checked, …
Calculations, conditions, …
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 10R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Business roles: task-oriented contents
PowerPortal user
TaskTaskassigns
KWGV : KWG management board
RDKL : RDK power plant management
HLBPR : HLB production manager
ZSTE : Central service / technical
etc. : . . .
defines
Business area drives
RoleSAP Enterprise Portal
ContentSIEMENS Cockpit
PHASE 5
ABT 6ABT 5ABT 4ABT 3ABT 2ABT 1
PHASE 4PHASE 3PHASE 2PHASE 1
RESSOURCENPLANUNG
0
20
40
60
80
100
1. Qr tl. 2. Qr tl. 3. Qr tl. 4. Qr tl.
Page data
Navigation
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 11R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
OSI PI
CockpitBHN
MS AccessSAP BW
Data sources
Company overview (Dashboard)Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 12R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Production Emissions KPI’s Environmt. Events
unit 4
Accumulated production
Electricity
Heat
Production Monitoringlocation time
Net Generation
District Heating
Station Supply
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 13R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Detailed Trend Analysis
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 14R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Environmental Values and Trends
3
3
Production Emissions KPI’s Environmt. Events
river temperature
cooling water - heating cooling water - outlet temperature
location time
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 15R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
location month
operation time analysis work analysis dispatcher view low load / high load events graphs
Nominal energyAvailable energy
not available energy
unplanned
planned
energy availability factor
Production: KPI’s (availability, detailed structured analysis)
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 16R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Maintenance: KPI’s (orders, detailed structured analysis)
production
operation
maintenance
techn. KPI’scomercial KPI’sreportsgeneral
ordersorders analysisnotific. analysis
orders
Statistics
order details
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 17R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
experiences and success factors
Even a fully automated data supply requires system support
The data flow based on numerous backend systems requires a change management
As for all applications a user management is required (sensitive information)
Due to easy usage of the PowerPortal only little hotline support is required
The easy access to a huge number of information causes needs for changing previously event-driven data collections ( e.g. once per month ) into a permanentavailable data flow.
It is recommended to provide data in databases.
Improved exchange of information between power plants and between power plants & headquarter
Increasing awareness for causal dependencies (technical <-> commercial)
Many users have access to information on all power plants
Data quality is very important
For general user acceptance information areas must be completely transferred intothe new portal environment
User-related
Administrative
General
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 18R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Future extensions of the EnBW PowerPortal
Presently „PowerPortal“ is implemented for all conventional power plants.
„PowerPortal“ for hydro-electrical power plants
Jan 2007 feasibility study “Hydro-electrical power plants”Nov 2008 Contract placement „PowerPortal Hydro-electrical power plants“
Dec. 2007 Contract placement feasibility study Focus on: environmental data, plant optimization, cross-plant information, …
Nov. 2008 Contract Placement “Functional Extensions”
Functional extensions for conventional power plants
2009 Contract placement feasibility study „PowerPortal“ for nuclear power plants
PowerPortal will than serve as an online information platform for the whole generation portfolio of EnBW comprising
fossil (coal, oil, gas), nuclear, hydro-electrical and other (waste-firing) power plants
PowerPortal will than serve as an online information platform for the whole generation portfolio of EnBW comprising
fossil (coal, oil, gas), nuclear, hydro-electrical and other (waste-firing) power plants
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 19R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Infonet Hydrology und Water Management Energiewirtschaft Operation Information
detailed navigation
Energy Management
Overview Rivers Regions
Running Water
click on location „Rockenau“
• Overview
• running water
• pumped storage
• EEG
electrical gross generation since 1. Jan : 111 MWh
actual electrical gross generation : 22 MW
electrical gross generation since 1. Jan : 111 MWh
actual electrical gross generation : 22 MW
operational condition
Machine 1 off
2 operation
operational condition
Machine 1 off
2 operation
Regions• Schwarzwald / Rhein 312 MW• Iller / Donau 258 MW• Oberer Neckar 111 MW• Unterer Neckar 168 MW
Rivers• Rhein 312 MW
▪ Elz 5 MW
▪ Murg 86 MW
▪ Raumünz 8 MW
▪ Neckar 279 MW
▪ Enz 29 MW
▪ Nagold 11 MW
▪ Glatt 7 MW
▪ Jagst 12 MW
▪ Kocher 21 MW
Donau 58 MW
▪ Iller 89 MW
Rockenau
Display s
ample from fe
asibilit
y study:
PowerPorta
l for h
ydro-electr
ical P
ower Plants
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 20R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
detailed navigation
Energiewirtschaft
Übersicht Flüsse Regionen
pump storage station Glems
El. output22 MW
turbine in operation
El. output0 MW
off
El. output- sum -22 MW
Aggregated el. output since 1.Jan. : 111 GWh
Aggregated el. purchase since 1.Jan. : 222 GWh
-100
-50
0
50
100
150Leistung [MW]
18:00 12:00.00:00 06:0012:00
M1 M2 Summe
► Overview
► Region 1
► Region 2
► Region 3
▼ Region 4•all Regions•Feudenheim•Schwabenheim•Heidelberg•Neckargemünd•Neckarsteinach•Hirschhorn•Rockenau•Guttenbach•Neckarzimmern•Gundelsheim•Kochendorf •Glems
Techn. actual Nominal generation purchase Operation hours capability
operational cond. Gross gener. generation since 1.Jan. seit 1.1. Pump Turbine hydr. KS upper basin
M1 operation 22 MW 25 MW 1111 h 2222 h 555 h M2 off 0 MW 25 MW 1111 h 2222 h 555 h
Sum 22 MW 22 MW 333 GWh 555 GWh 111 MWh
Techn. actual Nominal generation purchase Operation hours capability
operational cond. Gross gener. generation since 1.Jan. seit 1.1. Pump Turbine hydr. KS upper basin
M1 operation 22 MW 25 MW 1111 h 2222 h 555 h M2 off 0 MW 25 MW 1111 h 2222 h 555 h
Sum 22 MW 22 MW 333 GWh 555 GWh 111 MWh
Display
sam
ple fr
om fe
asibi
lity st
udy:
Power
Porta
l for h
ydro
-elec
trica
l Pow
er P
lants
Infonet Hydrology und Water Management Energiewirtschaft Operation InformationEnergy Management
Overview Rivers Regions
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 21R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Iller Power Plants
► Iller power plants
► ODK
► small power plants
Aitrach Mooshausen Arlacher Weir Kirchdorfer Weir
181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s 181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s
181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
Qges
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
0
5
10
15
20
25
05.10. 08.10.06.10. 07.10.04.10.03.10.02.10.
Abfluss [m3/s]
0
5
10
15
20
25
05.10. 08.10.06.10. 07.10.04.10.03.10.02.10.
Abfluss [m3/s]
LEW 8Sonthofen Qges13,5 m3/s13,5 m3/s 30,0 m3/s30,0 m3/s
584,36
261,0 m3/s261,0 m3/s
0.5 MW0.5 MW
584,12
584,31
566,52 566,50
584,55
594,82
594,86
548,82
566,41
533,09
548,37
548,46
540,60
567,79
578,65
551,35
0,00
Tannheim
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
Unteropfingen
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
Dettingen
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
261,0 m3/s261,0 m3/s
8.1 MW8.1 MW
Region 1 FlüsseRegion 3Region 2 Region 4
• overview• Dettingen• Unteropfingen• Tannheim• Mooshausen• Aitrach• Arlacher Wehr• Kirchdorfer Wehr
detaled navigation Iller
181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s 181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s
181,0 m3/s181,0 m3/s
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
Qges
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
4,5 m3/s4,5 m3/s
0
5
10
15
20
25
05.10. 08.10.06.10. 07.10.04.10.03.10.02.10.
Outlet [m3/s]
0
5
10
15
20
25
05.10. 08.10.06.10. 07.10.04.10.03.10.02.10.
Outlet [m3/s]
0
5
10
15
20
25
05.10. 08.10.06.10. 07.10.04.10.03.10.02.10.
Outlet [m3/s]
13,5 m3/s13,5 m3/s 30,0 m3/s30,0 m3/s
584,36
261,0 m3/s261,0 m3/s
0.5 MW0.5 MW
584,12
584,31
566,52 566,50
584,55
594,82
594,86
548,82
566,41
533,09
548,37
548,46
540,60
567,79
578,65
551,35
0,00
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
101,0 m3/s101,0 m3/s
5.5 MW5.5 MW
261,0 m3/s261,0 m3/s
8.1 MW8.1 MW
Region 1 RiversRegion 3Region 2 Region 4
Display
sam
ple fr
om fe
asibi
lity st
udy:
Power
Porta
l for h
ydro
-elec
trica
l Pow
er P
lants
Infonet Hydrology und Water Management Energy Management Operation Information
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 22R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
detailed navigation Neckar (diagram)
Deizisau Oberesslingen Esslingen Obertürkheim Untertürkheim Cannstatt Hofen Aldingen Poppenweiler27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s 27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s777 kW0 MW0 MW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s999 kW
222 kW333 kW444 kW
27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
~~>
Marbach27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Pleidelsheim27 m3 / s888 kW111 MW222 MW333 kW 444 kW
Hessigheim27 m3 / s777 MW
333 MW444 MW
Besigheim27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Lauffen27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Horkheim27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Heilbronn27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Kochendorf27 m3 / s999 kW
222 kW333 kW444 kW
Gundelsheim27 m3 / s777 kW
~~>
Neckarzimmern27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Guttenbach27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Rockenau27 m3 / s
Hirschhorn27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Neckarsteinach27 m3 / s777 kW0 MW0 MW
333 kW444 kW
Neckargemünd27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Heidelberg27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
Schwabenheim27 m3 / s999 kW
222 kW333 kW444 kW
Feudenheim27 m3 / s777 kW
333 kW444 kW
~~>
actual electrical power „Neckar“ : 12.3 MW actual outlet „Feudenheim“ : 123 m3 / s
Jags
t
Koc
her
Enz
27 m3 / s 27 m3 / s
27 m3 / s
• Neckar
Display s
ample from fe
asibilit
y study:
PowerPorta
l for h
ydro-electr
ical P
ower Plants
Region 1 FlüsseRegion 3Region 2 Region 4Region 1 RiversRegion 3Region 2 Region 4Infonet Hydrology und Water Management Energy Management Operation Information
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 23R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
EnBW PowerPortal key figures
Status of project:
▫ One PowerPortal for
▫ 7 conventional locations and KWG headquarter
▫ 12 different backend systems as data sources
▫ ca. 400 portal pages
▫ ca. 12.000 data elements
▫ over 200 employees have access to the portal
▫ required training & information effort ( EnBW-internal )
▫ 5 general information events for each main location
▫ 18 introduction courses (~ 2,5 h each)
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio
Dr. J. Rassow, EnBW 24R. Lord, SIEMENSSAP for Utilities 2008; North American Conference, San Antonio, Texas, Oct. 27, 2008
Most important ...
Sound basis for decision makeron up-to-date and verified information
Accelerated business processesdue to views on coherent technical and commercial data
Low costs due to continued usage of existing systems
Little hotline and IT-service effort due to the usage of standard browsers as client-tool
... and additionally ... Process optimization by the support of benchmarking Fast, well-founded decisions, e.g. by “best practice sharing”
Advantage on better information based on data from different expert systems
Increased awareness on commercial relations and dependencies
Reduced effort for information retrieval
Improved productivity and easy usageby user-specific tailored access to information
Improved motivation of the employees by working on the system
Internet-based data access for entitled EnBW-employees
Conclusion
Efficient Management of a mixed Generation Portfolio