Post on 19-Aug-2020
Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CTE Handouts Packet Order Base Module A - CTE Infographic B - CTE Graphic Organizer C - CTE Flow Chart D - CTE Planning Reflection Questions E - CTE Action Plan F - CTE Practice Profile Social Network A - CTE Infographic G - CTE Efficacy Definitions and Decision Making H - Directions for Social Network Analysis E - CTE Action Plan F - CTE Practice Profile C - CTE Flow Chart D - CTE Planning Reflection Questions Teacher Leadership A - CTE Infographic G - CTE Efficacy Definitions and Decision Making I - 7 Dimensions of Teacher Leadership E - CTE Action Plan F - CTE Practice Profile C - CTE Flow Chart D - CTE Planning Reflection Questions Decision Making A - CTE Infographic G - CTE Efficacy Definitions and Decision Making E - CTE Action Plan F - CTE Practice Profile C - CTE Flow Chart D - CTE Planning Reflection Questions Teacher Inquiry A - CTE Infographic G - CTE Efficacy Definitions and Decision Making E - CTE Action Plan F - CTE Practice Profile C - CTE Flow Chart D - CTE Planning Reflection Questions
Collective Teacher Efficacy
Purpose
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (#H323A120018, #H323A170020). However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.
Effective Teaching and Learning for ALL studentsMissouri Model Districts
Educational Systems and Instruction for Learning
MOEDU-SAIL
What is Collec�ve Teacher Efficacy (CTE)?
• extend less effort,• give up more easily,• perform at lower levels,• experience burnout more o�en,• feel isolated, and• experience more uncertainty.
Benefits• find new ways to tackle difficult
challenges,• have high expecta�ons for improving instruc�on and student learning,• are open to new ideas,• are willing to experiment,• are resilient,• work collabora�vely, and• welcome parent par�cipa�on.
When CTE is high in schools, teachers
When CTE is low in schools, teachers
instruc�onal -making acrossour building, and classrooms?
CTE capacity is built through
• collabora�ve social networks,• teacher leadership,• teacher voice in decision making & problem solving, & • collabora�ve teacher inquiry.
Why is CTE Important?
Effect Size
ZONE OF DESIRED EFFECTS
Typical
Teacher
E�ectsDevelopmental
E�ects
REVERSE
0
.15
.30 .40 .50
.60
.70
.80
.90
1.0
Collec�ve Teacher Efficacy
(1.57 effect size)
DESIRED EFFECTS .90
1.0
(Ha�e, 2017)
• Improves student performance• Builds educator confidence for
addressing the needs of all students• Enhances parent-teacher rela�onships• Fosters teacher commitment
Brinson, D. & Steiner, L. (2007)
Brinson, D. & Steiner, L. (2007)
Collective Teacher Efficacy is the perception of a group of educators about their ability to positively affect student learning.
Brinson, D. & Steiner, L. (2007)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Moedu-sail.org
Collective Teacher Efficacy
Collective Efficacy
Teacher Efficacy
Self-Efficacy
Efficacy
Mastery
Vicarious
Affective
Social Persuasion
CTE Graphic Organizer
Base Collective Teacher Efficacy (CTE) Module completed?
Yes
All teachers collaborate and use data for learning?
Yes
All teachers work together to use data, collaboratively plan, and share instructional practice?
Yes
Teachers are involved in the process of decision making around data?
Yes
Teachers initiate decision making?
Yes
Teacher Inquiry Package
No
All teachers informally discuss data, share
knowledge, and observe one another?
Yes
Leadership responsibilities are
shared with teachers?
Yes
Teachers trust and problem
solve together?
Yes
Teachers feel empowered to
make decisions?
Measure Collective Teacher Efficacy Implementation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
All teachers have opportunity to
celebrate successes and encourage
others?
No
A school observer would see our school as hierarchical?
Collaboration and Social Networks
Module
No
YesTeacher Leadership
Module
Teacher Decision Making Module
Yes
Start
Yes
Is CTE high in district/building?
Go back to start and revisit Base (CTE) Module
No
Measure and review CTE at least annuallyYes
Go back to start and revisit Base (CTE) Module
NOTE: When a learning module is complete return to START.
For all yes responses record evidence in a separate document.
Missouri SPDG/ MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CTE Planning Reflection Questions
Directions: Use these reflection questions to help prioritize which CTE Focus Modules might benefit your school district. A yes response would indicate that you already have a strong culture of this in your school/district. A no response would indicate that there is information in this module that would be helpful to you and your school/district. Considerations for sharing information from CTE Base Package with all staff
❑ Do all teachers have a combined belief that teachers have a major impact on learning? ❑ Do all teachers have opportunity to celebrate successes and encourage each other?
Considerations for Collaboration and Social Networks Focus Module
❑ Do all teachers collaborate and use data for learning? ❑ Do all teacher informally discuss data, share knowledge, and observe one another? ❑ Do all teachers have opportunity to celebrate successes and encourage each other? ❑ Are all teachers involved in two or more teams/work groups? ❑ Do teachers collaborate across grade levels/contents?
Considerations for Teacher Leadership Focus Module
❑ Are leadership responsibilities shared by teachers? ❑ Is it difficult to know a hierarchy in decision making? ❑ Do teachers provide professional development for each other? ❑ Do teachers participate in professional organizations? ❑ Are there strong family-professional partnerships?
Considerations for Teacher Decision Making and Problem-Solving Focus Module
❑ Is there a general sense of trust among the teachers? ❑ Do teachers work together to solve problems? ❑ Do teachers use a problem-solving orientation when faced with challenges? ❑ Do teachers feel empowered to make decisions? ❑ Do teachers have meaningful opportunities to provide input into decisions?
Considerations for Collaborative Teacher Inquiry Focus Module
❑ Are all teachers involved in the process of decision making around data? ❑ Do teachers initiate decision making? ❑ Is time allocated for data-based decision making? ❑ Are teachers use a protocol for decision making meetings? ❑ Do teachers work collaboratively to process data?
Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Next Steps: Actions = Results Content Focus ☐Social Networks ☐Teacher Leadership ☐Teacher Decision Making ☐ Teacher Inquiry School: _________________________ Date Next Steps Form Written: _______________________________ Teams (e.g. grade level or content): _________________________________________________________________________________
Action Planned
What?
Responsible Person(s)
Who?
Timeline
When?
Resources/Support Needed Results
So What?
Missouri SPDG/ MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Collective Teacher Efficacy (CTE) Practice Profile
Essential Function Exemplary Implementation Proficient
Close to Proficient (Skill is emerging, but not
yet to proficiency. Coaching is
recommended.)
Far from Proficient
(Follow-up training and coaching are critical.)
1
District/Building leaders provide opportunities for teachers to experience the four sources of efficacy, and teachers have a combined belief that they have a major impact on student learning.
85% of teachers report that within the last 12 months, they have met 5 criteria for efficacy. • They have successfully implemented a new instructional
strategy or practice learned in training (affective state). • They have received feedback and encouragement regarding
the implementation of an instructional strategy or practice learned in training (social persuasion).
• They have seen others in their building implement a new instructional strategy or practice learned in training (vicarious experience).
• They have collected informal or formal data to indicate they have successfully implemented a new instructional strategy or practice learned in training (mastery experience).
• They report they have the resources and support needed to make a major impact on student learning.
70% of teachers report that within the last 12 months they have met 5 criteria.
50% of teachers report that within the last 12 months they have met 5 criteria.
Fewer than 50% of teachers report that within the last 12 months they have met 5 criteria.
2
District/Building leaders provide opportunities for teacher collaboration that encourages the development of social networks focused on improving instructional practice.
85% of teachers report having met 4 criteria. • They participate in conversations with other teachers about
ways to improve instruction 3 or more times per week. • Their collaborative conversations with other teachers are
helpful for improving instructional practice. • They are part of formal and informal collaborative social
networks. • They experience shared leadership within teams.
70% of teachers report having met 4 criteria.
50% of teachers report having met 4 criteria.
Fewer than 50% of teachers report having met 4 criteria.
Missouri SPDG/ MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Collective Teacher Efficacy (CTE) Practice Profile
3
District/Building leaders design school structures, promote professional development, and allot time in ways that support the development of teacher leadership.
85% of teachers participate in school leadership opportunities through • work focused on school and/or district improvement, • professional development provided by themselves and/or
colleagues, • work focused on strengthening school and/or district
curriculum, • opportunities to participate in professional organizations,
and • work focused on family/community partnerships.
70% of teachers participate in school leadership opportunities through 5 criteria.
50% of teachers participate in school leadership opportunities through 5 criteria.
Fewer than 50% of teachers participate in school leadership opportunities through 5 criteria.
4
District/Building leaders establish a climate that values teacher voice in decision making
Regarding major decisions in their school, 85% of teachers report the following 5 criteria occur • the decision-making process is transparent, • the decision-making process includes opportunities for
teachers to share their ideas and expertise, • they believe they had an influential voice in decisions, • they trust those in the decision-making role, and • a collaborative problem-solving approach is used to generate
ideas/solutions.
Regarding major decisions in their school, 70% of teachers report the 5 criteria.
Regarding major decisions in their school, 50% of teachers report the 5 criteria.
Regarding major decisions in their school, fewer than 50% of teachers report the 5 criteria.
5
District/Building leaders design intentional supports that promote collaborative teacher inquiry.
85% of teachers participate in collaborative inquiry that includes the following 6 criteria. • has a formal structure (meeting times, teams, and process
are defined), • builds consensus around compelling problems of instruction, • involves collaborative collection and analysis of data relevant
to the identified problem of instruction, • results in collective commitment to a plan to address student
needs, • results in evaluation of the plan and further adjustments, and • improves teachers’ understanding and teaching practices.
70% of teachers participate in collaborative inquiry that includes the 6 criteria.
50% of teachers participate in collaborative inquiry that includes the 6 criteria.
Fewer than 50% of teachers participate in collaborative inquiry that includes the 6 criteria.
Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Efficacy Definitions and Decision Making Types of Efficacy How does this type of efficacy impact teacher decision making and problem-solving?
Efficacy
Self-Efficacy
Teacher Efficacy
Collective Efficacy
Collective Teacher Efficacy
Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Directions for Social Network Analysis Experiment
1. Have participants fold a paper blank sheet of paper into 3 columns.
2. In their left most column, each person lists the names of the last 10 people with whom they have talked or texted.
3. In the second column to the right, ask them to write their relationship to each person on their list. For example, was that your husband, your brother, your best friend, your trainer?
4. In the third column, ask them to write out the name of the person who introduced them to that person (if someone did and they could remember who it was). For example, if the person in your list is your child’s teacher, and your husband introduced you to your child’s teacher, you would write down “husband” in the 3rd column for that entry.
5. Creating this list will take about 5-7 minutes. [Ask if there are any insights from the list they have just created. Are there any patterns in who they talk with, who introduced them to other people, etc?] Discuss how there is often an individual that brings the different groups together. Can the identify this person?
6. Then flip the paper over. On the other side, ask them to draw a large circle taking up the size of the paper and list the 10 people they had last spoken to (the same 10 that are on in the first column on the other side of the sheet) so that they are spread out all over the circle. Tell them to then draw lines between people who know each other.
Little clusters or small groupings will most likely emerge within their circles. Point this out.
7. Form groups of two, 3 or 4 participants. Ask them to place their networks side-by-side and draw lines between people across the networks. This should take about 5 minutes or less.
8. Ask participants to look at how interconnected their networks are – who are the people who bridge the networks? How dense are the networks? Remind them, this is an exercise and may not reflect their actual social networks. Later, they will think about the actual social networks in their building.
9. Reiterate: Schools with dense networks (many relationships) tend to have high levels of collective efficacy.
Adapted From: York-Barr, J. & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research,74(3), 255-316. Missouri SPDG/MMD/DCI June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
7 Dimensions of Teacher Leadership
Dimension
Examples
Coordination, Management
• Coordinating daily schedules and special events • Participating in administrative meetings and tasks • Monitoring improvement efforts • Handling disturbances
School or District Curriculum Work
• Defining outcomes and standards • Selecting and developing curriculum
Professional Development of Colleagues
• Mentoring other teachers • Leading workshops • Peer coaching • Modeling • Encouraging
Participate in School Change/Improvement
• Taking part in school-wide decisions • School change activities • Action research • Group learning activities
Parent/Community Involvement
• Encouraging parent participation • Partnerships • Working with community organizations
Contributions to the Profession
• Participating in professional organizations • Being politically involved
Preservice Teacher Education
• Partnerships with colleges and universities to prepare future teachers.