Case Study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

Post on 11-Feb-2016

43 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Case Study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet. C. Bayer, L. Dassa , R. Principe, R. Vallcorba , D. Valuch , J. Vogt. [1]. 1 . Motivation. 1 . Motivation. Quadrupole magnet of NiTi for triplet. x. z. y. Emittence at 90%. [1]. 2 . Cable design. 2 . Cable design. Parameters. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Case Study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20131

Cern Accelerator School, Erice

Case Study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

C. Bayer, L. Dassa, R. Principe, R. Vallcorba, D. Valuch, J. Vogt

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20132

1. Motivation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20133

1. Motivation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Quadrupole magnet of NiTi for triplet

x

z

y

Emittence at 90%

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20134

2. Cable design

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20135

2. Cable design

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Parameters

h𝑅𝑢𝑡 𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑁𝑖𝑇𝑖𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒

N strand 40Strand d (mm) 0.85Cable width (mm) 17.5Cable in thickn. (mm) 1.389Cable out thickn. (mm) 1.59Keystone angle 0.66Ins 0.15Cu% 54.5Sc% 45.5Cu/Sc ration 1.2

Area SC cable (mm²) 10.328Area copper cable (mm²) 12.484Area ins cable (mm²) 31.853Fill fact 0.324

𝐶𝑢−𝑂𝐹𝐶

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20136

3. Magnetic gradient

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20137

3. Magnetic gradient

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

• κ = 0.324• w = 35 mm

= 146 T/m = 10.0 T

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20138

4. Current calculation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 20139

4. Current calculation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Parameters

Necessary current density:

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201310

4. Current calculation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Parameters

Necessary current density:

Area inside cable 31.853 mm²Area SC cable 10.328 mm²

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201311

4. Current calculation

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Operation parameters Single strand parameters

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201312

5. Mechanical stabilization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201313

5. Mechanical stabilization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Thickness fo the shrinking cylinder4.2 mm + savety thickness

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201314

5. Mechanical stress of the mid plane

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085 0.09 0.095 0.1

-70.00

-65.00

-60.00

-55.00

-50.00

-45.00

-40.00

-35.00

-30.00

r / m

σy /

MPa

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201315

6. Iron yoke dimension

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201316

6. Ion yoke dimension

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

→ 𝑡 𝑟 ² ∙𝐺𝑠𝑠90%

2 ∙𝐵𝑠𝑎𝑡=0.118m

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201317

6. Ion yoke dimension

→ 𝑡 𝑟 ² ∙𝐺𝑠𝑠90%

2 ∙𝐵𝑠𝑎𝑡=0.118m

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

𝑅𝑟 =

0.12𝑚0.06𝑚=2

𝑤𝑟 =0.58

increasing of the mainfield by ~ 38%

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201318

7. Coil layout verification and optimization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet

[1]

02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201319

7. Coil layout verification and optimization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Two layers, one wedge b6 = b10 = b14 = 0 [0 – 21.5, 26.2 – 33.5]

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201320

7. Coil layout verification and optimization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

magnet center 𝐺𝑜𝑝 130𝑇𝑚

Two layers, one wedge b6 = b10 = b14 = 0 [0 – 21.5, 26.2 – 33.5]

requested aperture (120 mm)

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201321

7. Coil layout verification and optimization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201322

7. Coil layout verification and optimization

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201323

Superconducting magnets for particle accelerators H. Felice, P. Ferracin, S. Prestamon, E. Todesco,http://etodesco.home.cern.ch/etodesco/, USPAS, 2011.

Cable Design Optimization for HTS ApplicationsA. Ballarino, B. Bordini, L. Oberli, D. Richter,C. Scheuerlein and E. Seiler

Magnetic DesignE. Todesco

Superconductors for MagnetsR. Flükiger

Mechanical design of superconducting accelerator magnetsF. Toral

Basic course on accelerator opticsJ. Rossbach, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYP. Schmüser, II. Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, F.R. Germany

Quadrupole Magnetshttp://www.lhc-facts.ch/img/quadrupol/Quadrupol%20Schema%20xyz.jpg

Reference list

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013

Cern Accelerator Schoo, Erice 201324

5. Critical criteria

Case study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet02.05.2013