Post on 03-Jan-2016
description
APPA OVERVIEW OF EPACT APPA OVERVIEW OF EPACT 20052005
Transmission Provisions, Transmission Provisions, Merger Review, and MoreMerger Review, and More
Cindy BogoradSPIEGEL & MCDIARMID
1333 New Hampshire Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036
(202) 879-4000
November 10, 2005
2 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Electricity TitleElectricity Title
Most major overhaul of Federal Power Act and PUHCA since 1935
React to various problems—reliability, inadequate transmission, Enron scandals, regulatory gaps, QF machines
3 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Recurring ThemesRecurring Themes
Transmission infrastructure
Tradeoffs for PUHCA repeal-enhanced merger review authority
4 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Reliability (Reliability (EPAct05 § 1211; FPA EPAct05 § 1211; FPA § 215)§ 215)
Electric Reliability Organization to establish and enforce reliability standards with FERC oversight
Reliability standard “does not include any requirement to enlarge [bulk-power system] facilities or to construct new transmission capacity….”
5 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Reliability (cont’d)Reliability (cont’d)
Compliance with standards should prod transmission construction
Recovery of prudently-incurred costs to comply covered in incentive rulemaking
Periodic reports on bulk-power system reliability and adequacy
6 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Backstop Siting Authority Backstop Siting Authority (EPAct05 § 1221; FPA § 216)(EPAct05 § 1221; FPA § 216)
DOE to designate National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors- constraints or congestion adversely affects consumers
FERC (or where regional siting compact, DOE) may issue permit with federal eminent domain where state delays/conditions/lacks authority
7 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Backstop Siting Authority Backstop Siting Authority (cont’d)(cont’d)
Includes state inability to consider interstate benefits or failure to qualify requestor that does not serve end users
DOE lead agency for federal authorizations/environmental review
Expedition/reporting required
8 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Third-Party Finance (EPAct05Third-Party Finance (EPAct05§ 1222)§ 1222)
WAPA/SWPA participation in National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor facilities under certain circumstances
Third party funding, capped at $100 million through 2015
9 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Federal Utility RTO Participation Federal Utility RTO Participation (EPAct05 § 1232)(EPAct05 § 1232)
Permits TVA and PMAs to participate in RTOs
Through contracts with protections
Includes ensuring consistency with existing contracts, third-party financing arrangements, and statutory obligations
10 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Transmission Infrastructure Rule Transmission Infrastructure Rule (EPAct05 § 1241; FPA § 219)(EPAct05 § 1241; FPA § 219)
Incentive/performance-based rates to benefit consumers by ensuring reliability/reducing delivered power cost by reducing congestion
Promote transmission investment “regardless of the ownership”
Technologies to increase capacity/efficiency
Return that attracts new investment
11 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Transmission Infrastructure Transmission Infrastructure Rulemaking – RTO ParticipationRulemaking – RTO Participation
To the extent within jurisdiction, FERC to provide incentives to each transmitting utility and electric utility that joins an RTO/ISO
Ensure any costs recoverable under this subsection may be recovered through utility’s transmission rates or RTO/ISO rates
12 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Transmission Infrastructure Transmission Infrastructure RulemakingRulemaking
Little in the way of specifics
All subject to just, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory standard
Flexibility to design rates that get needed transmission built at reasonable cost, e.g., by reducing risks and/or accessing new sources of capital
13 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Participant Funding Participant Funding (EPAct05 § (EPAct05 § 1242)1242)
Far less prescriptive than last bill
Permissive to FERC-may approve if just and reasonable, not unduly discriminatory and otherwise consistent with §§ 205/206
Consistent with existing law
14 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Native Load Service Obligation Native Load Service Obligation (EPAct05 § 1233; FPA § 217)(EPAct05 § 1233; FPA § 217)
Facilitate planning and expansion of transmission to meet reasonable needs of LSEs
Enable LSEs to secure firm transmission rights (or equivalent financial rights) on a long-term basis for long-term power supply arrangements
15 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Native Load Service Obligation Native Load Service Obligation (planning/long-term rights)(planning/long-term rights)
Applies in RTO and non-RTO markets (except ERCOT)
Required rulemaking to implement within organized markets
16 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Native Load Service Obligation Native Load Service Obligation (existing rights)(existing rights)
LSE is entitled to use existing firm rights or equivalent financial rights to meet service obligation
Preserves resource-to-load rights existing as of date of enactment
Whether through ownership, GFA, or OATT service agreement
Consistent with OATT
17 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Native Load Service Obligation Native Load Service Obligation (existing rights)(existing rights)
Not just TO native load
LSEs include everyone in this room; not just those serving enduse load
Include joint action agencies—obligation under long term contracts to municipal utilities that serve endusers
18 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Native Load Service Obligation Native Load Service Obligation (existing rights)(existing rights) N/A to PJM, NYISO, ISO-NE, and
CAISO (except certain CA rights protected against conversion)
Not directly applicable to MISO, but FERC must take policies into account when MISO changes FTR allocation methodology
Applies to SPP and other new RTOs
Separate added protections for PNW
19 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
PUHCA Repeal TradeoffsPUHCA Repeal Tradeoffs
PUHCA, by active and passive restraints, largely restricted utilities to compact vertically integrated entities
PUHCA’s repeal will open up industry to consolidation and fragmentation in ways we can’t imagine
20 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Tradeoffs - Mergers (Tradeoffs - Mergers (EPAct05 EPAct05 § 1§ 1289; amending FPA 289; amending FPA §§ 203) 203)
Expanded/clarified authority to review generation acquisitions and holding company mergers
But FERC must act within 180 days, plus 180-day extension period
21 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Merger Review (cont’d)Merger Review (cont’d)
Maintains traditional “consistent with the public interest” test
Added test: not result in cross-subsidization of non-utility or pledge/encumbrance of utility assets unless consistent with the public interest
22 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Qualifying Facilities (Qualifying Facilities (EPAct05 EPAct05 § 1§ 1253;253; amending PURPA § 210) amending PURPA § 210)
Eliminate restrictions on QF ownership
No obligation to purchase from new QF unless meets new requirements
No mandatory purchase obligation for new contracts if QF has non-discriminatory access to RTO/ISO with competitive wholesale market, or comparable markets
Preservation of existing QF contracts
23 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Odds and EndsOdds and Ends
Eliminate 60-day wait for Section 206 refunds
Non-RUS-financed coops with less than 4 million MWh sales removed from FERC jurisdiction
Sense of Congress that FERC should consider state objections to LICAP
24 SPIEGEL &
MCDIARMD
Bottom lineBottom line
Many, many rulemakings
Expanded FERC regulatory and enforcement tools
Costs won’t go down
Life won’t get less complicated