Glen Tuason

82
PART I: CIVIL PROCEDURE Jurisdiction Stuff to take note of in jurisdiction: x What is the definition of jurisdiction? x Jurisdiction over the case or the subject matter? (Subject matter jurisdiction) x Jurisdiction over the person or the defendant? x Know the rules on filing fees. N.B. vis-à-vis for criminal cases: x Definition – the same, as conferred by law, except you have to add that venue is jurisdictional . Territory is intertwined with jurisdiction, unlike in civil cases, where parties can agree on venue or it can be subject to waiver. x Jurisdiction over the offense. This is essentially the same as jurisdiction over subject matter. x Jurisdiction over the person. This is jurisdiction over the person of the accused. x Filing fees are not necessary. x What is the definition of jurisdiction? o The power of the court to hear, try, or decide the case o As conferred by law x How will the court know that it has jurisdiction? o From the allegations of the complaint. o What if the defense interposes claims or defenses outside the jurisdiction of the court? It does not divest the court of its jurisdiction; otherwise, jurisdiction will be at the mercy of the defense. x Where do you take jurisdiction over the case? o Conferred by law as well. o Study BP 129, amended by RA 7691. Do not assume that RA 7691 tells all. There are other laws too. x Distinguish jurisdiction from venue: o Jurisdiction is the power to hear and decide a case. Venue is where the action is instituted and tried. o Venue can be waived; jurisdiction, not. x Distinguish errors of jurisdiction from errors of judgment: o When a court takes cognizance of a case over the subject matter of which it has no jurisdiction, it commits an error of jurisdiction. It is reviewable by certiorari. o When a court makes errors in the exercise of such jurisdiction, it is just an error of judgment, reviewable by appeal. x What is the jurisdiction of the RTC? o 1. Right/title/interest over real property, where value is: Value is > 20K (OMM), > 50K (MM) Claim for ejectment due to unpaid rentals of over 400K. Which has jurisdiction? x MTC. Ejectment is always under MTC, regardless of the claim over unpaid rentals. Recovery of possession, not ejectment. Fair market value of property is 1.5M. The assessed value of the property is 80,000. Property is located in MM. Which has jurisdiction? x RTC, based on assessed value (not FMV) which is over 50K. “Recovery of possession” does not necessarily mean ejectment (ex. Accion publiciana). x Value is determined by assessed value if it involves right, title, or interest Ouano case? x There was discussion whether FMV or assessed value dictates. Assessed value wins. o 2. Amount incapable of pecuniary estimation Examples: rescission, reformation of contract, specific performance Is expropriation capable of pecuniary estimation? x Expropriation is always filed with the RTC. Though the subject matter is capable of pecuniary estimation, the action is exclusively instituted in the RTC. What about declaratory relief? x RTC always has jurisdiction, and the SC does not except when there is an issue of constitutionality. x There is no such thing as determination of value; just a determination of validity. What about support? x Even if its amount can be determined, the law confers it to the Family Courts. Foreclosure of mortgage?

description

Notes

Transcript of Glen Tuason

  • PART I: CIVIL PROCEDURE Jurisdiction

    Stuff to take note of in jurisdiction:

    x What is the definition of jurisdiction? x Jurisdiction over the case or the subject matter? (Subject matter jurisdiction) x Jurisdiction over the person or the defendant? x Know the rules on filing fees.

    N.B. vis--vis for criminal cases:

    x Definition the same, as conferred by law, except you have to add that venue is jurisdictional. Territory is intertwined with jurisdiction, unlike in civil cases, where parties can agree on venue or it can be subject to waiver.

    x Jurisdiction over the offense. This is essentially the same as jurisdiction over subject matter. x Jurisdiction over the person. This is jurisdiction over the person of the accused. x Filing fees are not necessary. x What is the definition of jurisdiction?

    o The power of the court to hear, try, or decide the case o As conferred by law

    x How will the court know that it has jurisdiction? o From the allegations of the complaint. o What if the defense interposes claims or defenses outside the jurisdiction of the court?

    It does not divest the court of its jurisdiction; otherwise, jurisdiction will be at the mercy of the defense. x Where do you take jurisdiction over the case?

    o Conferred by law as well. o Study BP 129, amended by RA 7691.

    Do not assume that RA 7691 tells all. There are other laws too. x Distinguish jurisdiction from venue:

    o Jurisdiction is the power to hear and decide a case. Venue is where the action is instituted and tried. o Venue can be waived; jurisdiction, not.

    x Distinguish errors of jurisdiction from errors of judgment: o When a court takes cognizance of a case over the subject matter of which it has no jurisdiction, it commits an error of

    jurisdiction. It is reviewable by certiorari. o When a court makes errors in the exercise of such jurisdiction, it is just an error of judgment, reviewable by appeal.

    x What is the jurisdiction of the RTC? o 1. Right/title/interest over real property, where value is: Value is > 20K (OMM), > 50K (MM)

    Claim for ejectment due to unpaid rentals of over 400K. Which has jurisdiction? x MTC. Ejectment is always under MTC, regardless of the claim over unpaid rentals.

    Recovery of possession, not ejectment. Fair market value of property is 1.5M. The assessed value of the property is 80,000. Property is located in MM. Which has jurisdiction?

    x RTC, based on assessed value (not FMV) which is over 50K. Recovery of possession does not necessarily mean ejectment (ex. Accion publiciana).

    x Value is determined by assessed value if it involves right, title, or interest Ouano case?

    x There was discussion whether FMV or assessed value dictates. Assessed value wins. o 2. Amount incapable of pecuniary estimation

    Examples: rescission, reformation of contract, specific performance Is expropriation capable of pecuniary estimation?

    x Expropriation is always filed with the RTC. Though the subject matter is capable of pecuniary estimation, the action is exclusively instituted in the RTC.

    What about declaratory relief? x RTC always has jurisdiction, and the SC does not except when there is an issue of constitutionality. x There is no such thing as determination of value; just a determination of validity.

    What about support? x Even if its amount can be determined, the law confers it to the Family Courts.

    Foreclosure of mortgage?

  • x Two views: one says that its always with the RTC, because it only covers the security of the property. The original action is always for recovery of money.

    x The other view is that it must be governed by the value of the security. o 3. Family cases/marriage

    Includes support, annulment, nullity, etc. o 4. Juvenile/agrarian case o 5. Other claims, where claim exceeds 300K (OMM) or 400K (MM)

    The original text gives lower values. When was it adjusted? x Original costs took effect March 25, 1994 x 1999 adjusted OMM from 100K to 200K x 2004 adjusted both MM and OMM to 400K and 300K respectively

    Always take note of the word exceeding so the exact amount is for the lower court. o 6. Probate of will, determination of inheritance same amounts

    Considering that the MTC has jurisdiction over probate cases, at times, what if the value of the estate is 100K? Can the probate of a will be subject to summary procedure?

    x No. The rules on summary procedure explicitly exclude probate proceedings. Note that the MTC has a number of procedures. There are ordinary proceedings and summary proceedings,

    and now, small claims. x So the not exceeding 100K (OMM) and not exceeding 200K (MM) only applies for summary

    proceedings. But it explicitly excluded probate proceedings. What is the jurisdiction of the MTC over small claims?

    x Not exceeding 100K. o 7. Admiralty cases same amounts o 8. All cases not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, person, or body exercising judicial or quasi-judicial

    functions x In determining the 300K/400K, can you include damages, interest, attorneys fees, litigation costs, etc?

    o NO. Only limit the amount to the demand or the claim. The totality rule only covers purely money claims, and does not include incidental claims.

    o But remember that there can be a principal action for damages, in which the amount of damages claimed determines the amount. This is not covered by RA 7691, this is covered by 95-9-94.

    x Small claims o What is the amount?

    Not exceeding 100K. o Is there a distinction between OMM and MM in small claims?

    No. o What should be included in the 100K?

    The claim itself. Exclusive of damages What if the principal action is for damages?

    x Does not apply. Actions for damages are not covered by small claims actions, because these have to be ascertained. These are not akin to sum-of-money cases.

    o Does it cover quasi-delicts? Yes. (Covers: fault/negligence, quasi-contract, or contract)

    o What if it arises from commission of an offense? Yes for the civil aspect of such (fault/negligence). Just remember that when you file a criminal case, the civil aspect is likewise filed (unless reserved, waived, or

    filed ahead). So it cannot be the subject of small claims. BUT if it is filed ahead or reserved, then it can be the subject of an action for small claims.

    o What, therefore, are the actions covered by small claims? A. Money owed under:

    x Contract of lease x Contract of loan x Contract for services x Contract of sale x Contract of mortgage

    B. Damages from: x Fault or negligence x Quasi-contract x Contract

  • C. Enforcement of a barangay amicable settlement o Do you need a lawyer to file the complaint? Do you need to prepare a regular complaint?

    No need for a lawyer. There is also a standard form provided. o What must be filed in the MTC to commence the claim?

    1. Accomplished and verified Statement of Claim (Form 1-SCC) 2. CNFS 3. 2 photocopies of the actionable document 4. Affidavits of witnesses and other evidence Is joinder allowed?

    x Yes, as long as the aggregate amount doesnt exceed 100K o What is the next step?

    1. Court may dismiss the small claim 2. Otherwise, it issues summons on the same day directing respondent to submit a verified response 3. Court also issues a notice to both parties directing them to appear for hearing on a specified date with warning

    against unjustified postponement. 4. Respondent submits verified response within 10 days from receipt of summons, with photocopies of

    documents and affidavits of witnesses. x What if there is no response?

    o Court grants the claim. o But may reduce the amount of damages claimed, if excessive.

    o When is a counterclaim allowed requisites? 1. It is within the coverage of the small claims court, exclusive of interests and costs 2. Arises from the same transaction or event as plaintiffs claim 3. Does not require joinder of third parties 4. Not subject of another pending action What if the defendant fails to raise such counterclaim?

    x It is barred. o How will you address the problem where the claim is for sum of money not exceeding 100K, and it is outside

    MM? There is an overlap here between summary procedure and small claims procedure. Which is preferred? This is still open for discussion, and is not yet clear. Sir suggests that the option is upon the complainant, since there is concurrent jurisdiction of both small claims

    court and court of summary procedure. o How is the hearing conducted?

    The judge first attempts to arrive at mediation, conciliation, early neutral evaluation, or any mode of JDR. Failing that, the JDR judge also proceeds to hearing, which must terminate within 1 day.

    x N.B. Sec. 21 of BP 129, as amended, provides that the RTC has concurrent original jurisdiction for: o 1. Certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, habeas corpus, injunction, enforceable within respective regions o 2. Actions affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls

    x What is the MTC jurisdiction? o Just the opposite of everything in RTC o Then just add ejectment/unlawful detainer o How do you know whether its ejectment/UD or claim over real property or a title therein?

    If the issue is just possession, its E/UD. If it involves rights of the parties to the property, then its not. x What is the jurisdiction of the CA?

    o It has both original and appellate jurisdiction. o Original: habeas corpus, habeas data, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, writ of amparo, annulment of

    judgment of RTC N.B. Its original jurisdiction is exclusive as regards annulment of judgment of RTC

    o Appellate: ordinary appeal (notice of appeal), petition for review, over quasi-judicial bodies x What is the jurisdiction of the SC?

    o Also both original and appellate jurisdiction. o Original: habeas corpus, habeas data, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, writ of amparo, disciplinary actions

    over PLUS Actions against members of the Bar [concurrent with IBP]; actions against ambassadors, public ministers, consuls, etc.; constitutionality of treaties, laws, proclamations, etc.; declaratory relief only when there is a question of constitutionality

    o Appellate: decision of CA, decision of CTA en banc, decision of SB, decision of RTC on pure questions of law;

  • REMEMBER this motherhood statement: the only way to go up to the SC is for petition for review on certiorari (RULE 45). This applies to civil and criminal cases, except if the penalty in a criminal case is death, RP, of life imprisonment.

    x Jurisdiction over the person of the defendant: o 1. Voluntary appearance

    By submitting to the jurisdiction of the court; ex. Appearing in court or filing an answer or filing motion for extension of time without disputing the courts jurisdiction

    o 2. Proper service of summons Rule 14

    x Filing fees: o Rule #1: payment of filing fees is jurisdictional in civil cases o Rule #2: how does the court determine filing fees?

    You include interest, damages, attorneys fees etc. pay everything that you allege for court fees But for jurisdictional purposes, just the principal claim

    o Rule #3: Sun Insurance Filing fees must be paid within prescriptive period or reglementary period (for appeals or compulsory

    counterclaims), or else it is deemed prescribed o Rule #4:

    Alday v. FGU Insurance Permissive counterclaims require docket fees

    x The claim does not arise from the principal action, but involves the same parties. This could easily have been filed separately.

    Compulsory counterclaims do not require docket fees BUT read Korean Technologies case of 2009 this is how you answer the question whether compulsory

    counterclaims require filing fees x From nowhere, this case required that even compulsory counterclaims have docket fees paid. Korean

    Technologies cited Rule 141. x But in practice, based on an SC Resolution, the collection of filing fees on compulsory counterclaims is

    suspended. This has not been lifted yet. x Alday: Payment of filing fees for compulsory counterclaims is not required. But you have to take note

    of Korean Technologies now o Lien on the judgment?

    If there are damages granted to the complainant, but there has been lack of payment of filing fees. The payment of docket fees is a lien on the damages.

    Also applies if damages are awarded in the judgment but not specified in the pleading. What if the claim has already ripened upon the filing of the complaint, but by omission, but you were not

    able to allege it. Can this be a basis for a lien on the judgment? x Proton Pilipinas v. Banque Nacional x There was a claim that has ripened but was not included, and there were interests that would ripen

    once the action is pending. x SC said that a claim ripened during the pendency of the case, it can be a lien on the judgment. x But if you did not allege it, the court cannot grant an award because you did not pay docket fees.

    o What is the rule on deficient or insufficient payment of filing fees? Rivera v. Del Rosario You have to pay full filing fees. The deficiency must not be based on the fault of complainant. But if the fault lay

    on the wrong assessment of the clerk of court, there is a chance to pay the deficiency. Jurisdiction is not automatically lost. Clerk of court makes a deficiency assessment. There must be no intention to defraud.

    x Planters v. Fertiphil: o Planters did not pay appellate docket fees. But this was in 1992, prior to the 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure, which began

    the requirement of appellate docket fees. The 1997 Rules must not apply retroactively. x Thornton:

    o Husband filed for habeas corpus in RTC Makati to recover child from wife o What are the two kinds of habeas corpus?

    N.B.: there are two kinds of habeas corpus custody of minors and regular habeas corpus in the Rules of Court o RTC Makati dismissed the case because the child was allegedly in Basilan. o What is the effectivity of writs of habeas corpus?

    N.B.: Effectivity of writ issued by regular court only enforceable in the territorial jurisdiction. But CA and SC everywhere.

  • o Filed with the CA, but was denied because the RTC (Family Courts) have original jurisdiction over custody of minor Habeas Corpus cases.

    o HELD: Can file with CA. It has jurisdiction. SC has jurisdiction, too. The CA and SC have concurrent jurisdiction over habeas corpus cases.

    o But always remember that when you talk about concurrent jurisdiction, you still have to follow hierarchy of courts. x Herrera v. Bollas

    o Ejectment case (1 year period). Filed within the proper period, but the complaint was amended to add additional defendants beyond the 1 year period. Does the court still have jurisdiction?

    HELD: MTC still had jurisdiction for ejectment (based on original complaint.) o After the lapse of the year period for ejectment, has the claim prescribed?

    No. N.B. One year period is not prescriptive period. You just file action pubiciana with the appropriate court (RTC or MTC, depending on the assessed value), not the MTC by default (for ejectment).

    x Oca: o Repetition of Tijam v. Sibonghanoy estoppel by laches. After active participation in a case, you cannot question the

    courts jurisdiction anymore. o Went up to the SC through Rule 43 (appeal to CA from a QJA) o But what is the general rule?

    Question of jurisdiction can be raised even for the first time on appeal, as long as estoppel by laches does not apply.

    One cannot question jurisdiction which he himself invoked. (Ex. obtaining affirmative relief against the other party and then after failing to obtain that relief, question the courts jurisdiction)

    x Usually decisions of QJA go up to the CA under Rule 43. What are the exceptions? o 1. HLURB decisions, as provided in charter, appealable to the Office of the President o 2. CTA decisions, under amended rules, appealable to the CTA en banc, then SC o 3. NLRC decisions, although by a QJA, are reviewable by the CA although not under Rule 43, but Rule 65 (GADALEJ). o 4. OMB decisions go to the CA, under Rule 43, for administrative cases. But if there is GADALAEJ, go to the SC, under

    Rule 65. x Mijares:

    o Which court has jurisdiction over enforcement of foreign judgments? RTC, because enforcement of foreign judgments are incapable of pecuniary estimation. ALWAYS, regardless of amount of judgment, since it is not based on the amount of the claim. In this type of action, you dont need to prove the facts again, etc.

    o Marcoss group that docket fees must be based on the value/amount of the claim, which is up to the Billions. Is this correct?

    This rule applies to money claims against an estate, but without judgment yet. Here, there already was a judgment in DC of Hawaii.

    o How do you impugn a judgment? Lack of notice Lack of jurisdiction Collusion Fraud

    o What is the rule on Arbitral awards? These must be should be enforced or recognized An arbitral award is not a foreign judgment (Under ADR Rules)

    x Zamboanga Barter Goods: o N.B. Rule 65 is not an appeal. It is a special civil action. o Being one, RTC, CA, and SC have concurrent jurisdiction. When you discuss concurrent jurisdiction, you cannot avoid

    discussing hierarchy. o But when you talk about appeals, no need to consider hierarchy. The law already makes a decision for you.

    x Can a court lose jurisdiction after acquiring it? o Generally, no. o Exceptions:

    1. Subsequent law provides prohibition for continued exercise of jurisdiction 2. Law penalizing the act is repealed by a subsequent law 3. Accused deprived of constitutional right 4. Proceedings are terminated, abandoned, declared void 5. Appeal has been perfected 6. Curative law

    x What is the principle of exercise of equity jurisdiction?

  • When the court is called upon to decide a particular situation and release the parties from correlative obligations, but if it would result in adverse consequences to the parties and the public, the court would go beyond its powers to avoid negative consequences in the release of the parties

    Jurisdiction of special bodies and courts

    x CHR: o Can it review court decisions?

    No; separation of powers o Can it issue injunctions?

    No. Just fact finding and investigative. x What is the extent of the labor arbiters power on claims for damages by employees?

    o Action for damages incident to dismissal is part of LAs powers. o BUT NOT if the damages are based on quasi-delict not arising from ER-EE relations.

    x What is the remedy for annulment of NHA awards? o With the Office of the President. o And then from there, Rule 65.

    x What are the cases under HLURB jurisdiction? o 1. Claims of condo buyers against project owner, developer, or dealer o 2. Specific performance of contractual and statutory obligations filed by condo buyers against same parties o Does HLURBs jurisdiction cover actions filed by the project owner, developer, or dealer?

    No. Its always the other way around. x COMELEC:

    o When can the SC review COMELEC decisions? Only when there is GADALEJ

    o Can the COMELEC issue writs of certiorari, prohibition, or mandamus? No.

    x What is the jurisdiction of Family Courts? o 1. Criminal cases where one or more of the accused is below 18 or one or more of the victims was a minor o 2. Petition for guardianship, custody of children, habeas corpus for custody of children o 3. Adoption of children and revocation o 4. Annulment, nullity, and actions on status and property relations of married people o 5. Support and/or acknowledgement o 6. Summary judicial proceedings other the FC o 7. Declaration of status of children (abandoned, dependent, neglected, etc.) and actions on parental authority o 8. Constitution of family home o 9. Cases against minors under the DDA o 10. Violation of Child Abuse Act (RA 7610) o 11. VAWC cases

    x What are the provisional remedies the Family Court can issue? o Restraining order against accused or defendant if there is finding of abuse o Temporary custody over children o Support pendente lite

    x What is the Katarungang Pambarangay Law? o There must be settlement of disputes between individual residents of the same city or municipality, through mediation,

    arbitration, or conciliation, before the Katarungang Pambarangay. Compliance with this is a condition precedent to filing a complaint or information before the fiscal or court.

    x What are the cases over which the lupon can take cognizance of? o ALL cases between parties residing in the same municipality or city. o What is determinative, residence or postal address?

    Residence, which is actual place which one inhabits. Must be more or less permanent, not merely transient. But it need not be domicile or legal residence; physical presence is controlling.

    o X filed a case against Y, who lived in the same barangay, and Z, who didnt. Is barangay conciliation needed? No. At least one respondent lived elsewhere.

    x What are the exceptions to this rule? o [Nature of a party] o 1. One party is the government or any subdivision/instrumentality o 2. One party is a public officer or employee and the dispute is re: official functions o 3. There is no private offended party

  • o 4. Complaint against juridical entities o [Nature of complaint] o 5. Offenses punishable by imprisonment of more than 1 year or fine exceeding 1000 pesos o 6. Labor disputes arising from ER-EE o 7. Disputes arising from CARL o 8. Action to annul judgment upon compromise o [City/municipality requirement] o 9. Dispute is re: real properties in different cities or municipalities

    Can be waived by the parties by consenting to submit the case to the lupon first o 10. Parties reside in barangays of different cities or municipalities

    Except where the barangays adjoin each other and the parties consent to submit the case to the lupon o [Equity] o 11. As determined by the President in the interest of justice, or upon recommendation by the SOJ o 12. Where urgent legal action is necessary to prevent injustice, specifically:

    A. criminal case where the accused is under custody or detention B. habeas corpus filed by one illegally detained C. actions with provisional remedies D. action may be barred by statute of limitations

    x Where are objections raised? o For objections to referral to the lupon, raise before the punong barangay else, waived o Failure to refer to lupon may be raised as a ground for motion to dismiss else, waived

    x What is the procedure before the lupon? o 1. Pay filing fees and submit complaint o 2. Within the next day the lupon summons respondents and complainants for mediation o 3. Failure of mediation within 15 days from first meeting: constitute the pangkat o 4. Pangkat has 15 days to resolve the dispute from when it convenes, extendible for another 15 days o Who appears before the lupon or pangkat?

    Just the parties, without counsel or representative, except minors who may be assisted by next of kin who are not lawyers

    x What is the form for settlement needed? o 1. In writing o 2. In a language known to the parties o 3. Signed by them o 4. Attested by lupon chairman o When may it be executed by the lupon?

    Within 6 months from date of settlement. If it exceeds 6 months, then it can be enforced by action in the MTC.

    o Within what period may the settlement be repudiated? 10 days, on the ground of vitiation of consent.

    Actions

    x What are the kinds of actions? o Civil

    Protection or enforcement of a right, or prevention or redress of a wrong Two types?

    x Ordinary x Special

    o Criminal Once the information is in court, only then does it become a criminal action, that has already been prosecuted by

    the State through the prosecutor. o Special proceedings

    Establishes a right, status, or condition x When is a civil action commenced?

    o Upon filing of original complaint in court. o For additional defendants later impleaded, on the date of filing of the later pleading.

    x Are civil actions always based on a cause of action? o No.

    x Distinguish ordinary civil action from special civil action? o There is Cause of Action in ordinary civil action.

  • o Ex. Special Civil Action like declaratory relief does not need cause of action x Requisites of cause of action?

    o 1. Right of one party o 2. Obligation of the other to respect o 3. Breach MOST IMPT!

    x Distinguish cause of action from right of action: o Right of action is the right to commence and prosecute an action to obtain the relief sought. Elements:

    1. Existence of cause of action 2. Performance of all conditions precedent to bring the action 3. Right to bring an maintain the action must be held by the person instituting it

    x What is the test of sufficiency of a complaint? o Whether or not, admitting the facts alleged, the court can render a valid judgment upon the same in accordance with the

    prayer in the complaint o Determined by the facts alleged, not defense alleged

    x What is splitting of a cause of action? o Dividing one cause of action into different parts and making each part a separate complaint o Test: how many wrongs or breaches are there? o Is splitting cause of action a ground for MTD?

    No it is Res Judicata and Litis Pendentia o Is the rule against splitting of causes of action absolute?

    No. Except: if the reliefs sought for are cognizable by different tribunals. An example is an Ejectment suit cannot include recovery for unpaid telephone, electric, and water bills, which must be filed in a separate action.

    x Can there be joinder of cause of action? o Yes. o BUT it is not mandatory.

    x Does there have to be just one breach or numerous violations? o Numerous. o For every cause of action, there is one breach. o For as many breaches as there are, there are as many causes of action.

    x If there is a claim for sum of money, and several claims for damages (moral, exemplary, etc.) are there multiple causes of action?

    o No. Just one, because claims for damages are incidents of the one breach (failure to pay). x There are three promissory notes, with amounts of 50K, 100K, and 200K, and there is just one loan. There was failure to

    pay. How many causes of action do you have? o Three PNs, three causes of action.

    x Can there be joinder of alternative causes of action? o Yes. Example is shipping of goods. First cause of action is based on breach of shipping contract. In case it is void, the

    alternative is to sue based on quasi-delict. x If you join cause of action should it arise from the same series of transactions, or can it be totally unrelated?

    o Scenario 1: X versus Y (just two parties). Can join as many causes of action, even if totally unrelated. o Scenario 2: X versus ABCD (multiple defendants). Can only join the causes of action if it complies with the rule on

    PERMISSIVE JOINDER (series of actions arising from the same facts or law Rule 3 Section 6) o Scenario 3: XYZ against A (multiple plaintiffs). Can only join the causes of action if it complies with the rule on

    PERMISSIVE JOINDER (series of actions arising from the same facts or law Rule 3 Section 6) x Can you join ordinary civil actions with special civil actions?

    o No. x Can you join two special civil actions?

    o No. Because they have their own special rules. x Can you join recovery of sum of money and ejectment?

    o No. Ejectment is summary proceeding, so it has its own rules. x What is the totality rule?

    o When all of the claims are claims for sums of money, even if one claim falls under the jurisdiction of the MTC but the rest may fall under the RTC, what controls is the sum of all claims.

    o But you cannot do this when not all are for sums of money. o When does the totality rule apply?

    1. Single plaintiff with multiple causes of action against the defendant 2. Multiple plaintiffs with separate causes of action against the defendant join in a single complaint

    o Xs claims against Y are both for claim of ownership for real property: property 1 is assessed at 49K, and property 2 is assessed at 15K and both are in manila. Can X file in the RTC?

  • No. While the total exceeds the 50K threshold in Manila, neither property falls within RTC jurisdiction so the action cannot be filed there.

    x There is a sum of money claim and recovery of property in Cavite. Can you join the action in Cavite? o Note: sum of money is determined by amount (personal). Recovery of property is determined by location of the property

    (real). o N.B. as well that venue is not jurisdictional in civil cases, unlike criminal cases. Note as well that venue is waivable. o Answer: Theoretically, you can join. But the other party is expected to file a motion to dismiss on the ground of improper

    venue. FOLLOW THE GENERAL RULE: The higher court absorbs the claim (RTC > MTC). x What is the rule on jurisdiction over counterclaims?

    o In the RTC, there is no limit to the counterclaim. In the MTC, the counterclaim is limited to the jurisdiction of the inferior court.

    o What happens to the balance? Its lost. So its better to file a separate action in this scenario.

    x Is misjoinder of cause of action a ground for its dismissal? o No, it will NOT cause dismissal of the principal action.

    It is severed and these proceed with separately. Although there can only be separate proceeding when there is separate filing.

    o The court is not duty-bound to proceed with it, especially when it appears that it has no jurisdiction. x What is a special civil action?

    o Covered by special rules. x Distinguish actions in rem, actions in personam, and actions quasi-in-rem:

    o Action in rem is one instituted against the whole world. o Action in personam is one against a definite defendant. It is intended to subject the interest of the defendant on a

    property to an obligation or lien. o Action quasi-in-rem

    When jurisdiction over the person cannot be acquired (usually, non-residents) and instead, jurisdiction over the res is acquired, although the owner is still named as defendant, unlike true cases in rem

    x Ex. by attaching the property of the non-resident The relief granted can only be limited to the res because there is no jurisdiction to grant a personal judgment If the person appears, it becomes an action in personam. If the person does not, jurisdiction is limited to the

    property x What are personal and real actions?

    o 1. Real action is one affecting title to or recovery of possession or partition, condemnation, or foreclosure of mortgage on real property

    o 2. Personal action covers all others Specific performance for delivery of real property is a personal action

    x What are the tests to determine the nature of an action? o 1. Ultimate objective test

    If the ultimate objective is to recover real property, it is a real action o 2. Allegations and prayer test

    The allegations of fact and relief prayed for determine the nature of the action x What is a local action?

    o One founded on privity of estates only and there is no privity of contracts x What is a transitory action?

    o One founded on privity of contracts between the parties x Atlantic Erectors:

    o Collection for sum of money over construction project over property. The plaintiff attempted to make an annotation of lis pendens on the title of the property. HELD: You cannot do this. This is an action in personam, not in rem, as regards the property.

    o A notice of lis pendens will only lie if it is a right, title, or interest over real property. Outside of this, you cannot avail of a notice of lis pendens.

    x Diaz: o Rule 43, up to the CA. Attached duplicate of decision, but not pleadings. This is enough for CA to give due course to the

    petition. x PDIC:

    o The main case is for declaratory relief (SCA). The question is whether there can be execution of such (yes). There can also be a counterclaim, even if declaratory relief is an SCA and the counterclaim is an ordinary action.

    x Tolentino v. Natanauan: o There is no res judicata between recovery of possession and nullity of deed of sale.

  • o Requisites of res judicata? A) Former judgment final B) Court had jurisdiction C) judgment on merits D) Identity of parties, subject matter, causes of action

    Parties

    x Who can be parties to an action? o Natural persons o Juridical persons o Those authorized by law

    x What is the general rule? o All those with capacity can be a party. o For natural persons, that is the age of majority.

    x Can a six year old boy be a party? o Yes, but with assistance of parent, guardian, or guardian-ad-litem. o A minor can sue, a minor can be sued if assisted.

    x What is the rule on married parties? o Sue and sued jointly. o What are the exceptions?

    Judicial separation of property Abandonment Exclusive property of spouses Involving practice of profession

    x What if the natural person is incapacitated? o Can sue and be sued, but must be assisted. o What if the person becomes incapacitated (supervening incapacity), will the case be dismissed?

    No. Sec. 18 provides that the court will provide assistance. x When can we say that a juridical person has capacity?

    o Duly incorporated and registered with the SEC. x [Mild segue into summons] If the defendant is a natural person, how do you serve summons?

    o Priority is personal service. It must be served to the persons, wherever he may be found. (Ex. The James Yap rule they tried serving it to him in Araneta)

    o If he cannot be found, substituted service to a a) person of sufficient age and discretion and b) residing therein. Either residence or office.

    What is sufficient age and discretion? Recent ruling says age of majority. Should not be a transient. Must reside therein.

    x Can a foreign corporation sue and be sued? o If its an isolated transaction, a foreign corporation can sue and be sued. o If its doing business but not licensed, it CANNOT sue, but can be sued. o If its doing business and is licensed, it can sue and be sued.

    x Service of summons to a domestic corporation? o Rule 14, Sec 11: president, managing partner, general manager, corporate secretary, treasurer, in-house counsel

    x How do you serve summons to a foreign corporation? o Resident agent one named to receive summons o Representatives and officers found in the Philippines (if it has a branch, for instance)

    x What is a non-juridical entity? What is the rule? (Ex. Toro Boys) o No separate juridical existence. o They can be parties, as defendants, and named as such (under the name under which they are generally and commonly

    known). o They CANNOT institute an action as a non-juridical entity. They have to institute it individually.

    x How do you serve summons to a non-juridical entity? o To anyone or person in charge of the office.

    x Who are those authorized by law? Give examples. o Political parties o Labor unions o Archdiocese o Estate

    x How do you serve summons?

  • o Depending on the entity they have different rules. x Can you serve summons to a natural person in prison?

    o Yes. Serve it to the warden. x For public corporations?

    o Province executive head (governor) o City city mayor o Municipality municipality mayor

    x Who is a real party in interest? o A party who stands to be benefitted or prejudiced by the judgment.

    x Does the concept extend even to defendants and third party plaintiffs/defendants? What about an intervener? o The law does not limit it to plaintiffs only it uses party as a generic term, so it can encompass any party impleaded, if

    he will benefit or be injured. x Does this concept of real party in interest apply to all cases?

    o No. The concept of real party in interest will only apply to private suits. o Does it apply to a taxpayer suit?

    No. Locus standi applies here. o Does it apply to criminal cases?

    [Not answered, but I think not] o What is the difference from legal standing/locus standi?

    This is from public suit filed by a private party. There is a broader policy concern here, even if there can be benefit or injury as well.

    o A Congressman does not believe in the act of the President, so he questions it as part of his legislative prerogative. Is he a RPII?

    No. Locus standi applies as well. x Thus, differentiate RPII from locus standi:

    o Locus standi pertains to acts of government. By reason of this act, you suffered injury. o You do NOT use legal standing in private suits. Only in public suits.

    x Who is a necessary party? o A) They are not indispensable, B) but ought to be joined if one needs complete determination of the case.

    x Who is an indispensable party? o If not impleaded, there can be no final determination. o N.B. The codal does not use the word complete. So they are compulsorily joined.

    x What if there is a suit against joint debtors? o The other parties not sued are necessary parties. o Can you sue one of them only?

    Yes. The court can issue a valid judgment, although not complete. o Can you then proceed against the other one, though not impleaded at first?

    Yes. x What if there is a solidary obligation, not joint? Ex. X and Y solidarily owe Z PHP 100,000. Z sues.

    o Neither necessary nor indispensable. o Can you sue X only?

    Yes. o Can there be judgment?

    Yes, because the obligation is joint and several (solidary). o Can you sue Y later on, having recovered from X?

    No, because you recovered already. o Can you sue at the same time?

    Yes. The case can proceed against either, or both. x There is an action for recovery of title AND possession. X holds title; Y has possession of the property. The action is just

    for recovery of title. Can you sue X? o Yes, because X is the proper party.

    x Same facts. Can you sue Y for recovery of title, without suing X? o No. Y is a mere possessor. The court cannot render judgment without impleading X. X is an indispensable party in this

    case. x What is the failure of failure to implead?

    o If it is a necessary party, the general rule is that failure to implead is non-prejudicial. There is no waiver of right to implead.

    BUT if there is an order to implead by the court and there is failure to comply, there is a waiver of claim. o If it is an indispensable party, the court should order that the indispensable party be impleaded (Domingo).

  • If despite this order to implead, the plaintiff did not comply, the case should be dismissed. o What if the court did not notice non-joinder, and thus did not order to implead the indispensable party, and

    renders a decision? The judgment is null and void.

    x What is a class suit? o One where the subject matter of the controversy is of common or general interest to many persons so numerous that it is

    impracticable to join all as parties o What is the rule?

    The court will allow a number of them sufficiently numerous and representative to fully protect the interests of all to sue or defend on behalf of all

    o What is the right of an individual party in interest? May intervene to protect his individual interest

    x When is there substitution of parties in a civil case? There are three. o 1. Death

    Who should die? x Any party. The law does not distinguish.

    This is the most common. o 2. Change of holder of public position (death, resignation, removal, cease to hold position)

    This is a very limited application, since it just applies to public officers. o 3. Transfer of interest

    x What are the requisites of substitution by death? o 1. A party dies o 2. The pending action is not extinguished by reason of death (IMPT) o Why does the law need to say this?

    Because there are actions that are extinguished by death. Examples are actions that are purely personal to the party

    Give examples. x Ex. Contract for Michael Jackson to sing in a party. x Ex. Receipt of a widow of support. When she dies, the support from widowers estate is gone.

    x What is the duty of the counsel after death? o 1. Give notice of death of the party within 30 days.

    When is the 30 day period counted? x From the FACT of death, and not from the knowledge thereof.

    o 2. Give names and addresses of the legal representatives Who should be legal representatives?

    x Legal heirs, administrator, or executor x N.B. The law provides for legal heirs, because there is procedure to be done before appointment of

    administrator or executor (ex. probate of the will for the latter). o 3. Court orders substitution and for the substitute to appear

    x There is action of A and B against C, D, and E. What if E dies? o The counsel of E names a substitute. The court will then act accordingly.

    x Same facts. However, there was no successful substitution (i.e. the duties were not complied with). What happens? o There can be a valid judgment, but only against C and D. o There can be no valid judgment against E.

    x Same facts. No substitution of E either. But C and D are incidentally, heirs of E. Can there be a valid judgment as to C and D? Is there a need for substitution?

    o There is still a need for substitution, even if C and D are already parties. That C and D are incidentally Es heirs as well does not change the result.

    o This is the Brioso case. There is valid judgment only against C and D. It is wrong to say that C and D automatically substitute for E. There are other heirs who are affected by this improper automatic substitution.

    o What is the effect if E is necessary? If E is indispensable? Relate the provisions above. If necessary, you can subsequently file a suit against Es heirs to complete the

    judgment. If indispensable, the judgment is null and void, even against C and D. x What if no legal representative is named by the counsel for the deceased party or the one named fails to appear?

    o The court may order the other party to procure the appointment of an executor or administrator for the estate of the deceased.

    o The costs for appointment may be recovered by the appointing party. x What are the requisites for substitution of public officer?

    o 1. Removal/death of public officer and appointment of successor within 30 days unless otherwise provided

  • o 2. Successor adopts, continues, or threatens to continue the action sued against o 3. There is substantial need to continue the action

    x Substitution is not automatic. What are needed to be done to substitute the new public officer? o 1. Give notice to the new public officer o 2. Opportunity to be heard for the new officer

    Mere fact that he is inclined to continue the action of the predecessor is not enough x Give an example of transfer of interest.

    o A sues B for judgment for sum of money based on contract. B assigns the contract to C and C accepts. o Can the case continue against B despite the transfer of interest?

    Yes. o Can the court order that C be impleaded?

    Yes. But there is no substitution here. C is just joined. o How then can there be substitution?

    The court has to order a substitution, not mere impleading. BOTTOM LINE: there has to be a court order. x In case of death of a defendant in a contractual sum of money case, will there be substitution? (VERY IMPORTANT)

    o Section 20. It will NOT go to the heirs, but it will continue against the estate. (Remember Succession!) o This is the special rule for contractual sum of money cases. o Ratio for this?

    Because you ultimately deal with the executor or administrator anyway. But its wrong to say there is substitution, because the law does not mandate it.

    o This position is further supported by Rules 86 and 87. o What are the requisites for this rule to apply?

    1. The DEFENDANT must die 2. It must be a sum of money case based on contract

    o What if the plaintiff dies? The general rule will apply, even if its a sum of money case.

    x Indigents Algura v. Local Government of Naga: Resolves the apparent conflict between Rule 3, Sec. 21 and Rule 141, Sec. 19.

    o If the indigent fits within the parameters set by Rule 141, Sec. 19, then the court must declare him to be an indigent. What is the Rule 141 requirement?

    x Gross income + family income does not exceed twice of monthly minimum wage x And owns real property whose FMV is less or equal to PHP 300K

    o If he doesnt, he falls under Rule 3, Sec. 21 and must apply for indigent status. (Indigency test) Here, the court exercises discretion as to whether you are an indigent or not.

    o So can a person owning real property with FMV of PHP 300,001 be declared an indigent? Yes, but under the indigency test.

    x If you are declared an indigent, you do not pay filing fees. But what happens when there is a judgment? o There is a lien, as regards filing fees.

    x What is the rule on stenographic notes? o It is free. There is no lien on the judgment.

    x What happens when the court finds out you are not an indigent? o The court can require you to pay. o What if you refuse to pay?

    The court can order execution. o What if you fail to pay or ignore the execution?

    The court can dismiss the case, for failure to comply with an order of the court. x When does the court in its discretion require the Solicitor General to be heard in person or through a representative?

    o When the action involves validity of a law, treaty, ordinance, EO, PD, or rules and regulations.

    Venue

    x What is the appropriate venue for: o 1. Real actions where the real property is found o 2. Personal actions residence of (principal) plaintiff, residence of (principal) defendant, or wherever a non-resident may

    be found o 3. Against non-residents and (a) the action affects the personal status of the plaintiff or (b) any property of the defendant

    in the Philippines Residence of plaintiff Or where the non-residents property may be found N.B. I suppose this pertains to the two situations, respectively

  • x Do not make the mistake of confusing venue and jurisdiction in civil procedure. Jurisdiction is the power given by law to hear, try, and decide cases. Knowing what court is one thing, but knowing where to file it is different.

    x There was an agreement to develop a piece of land in Tanay, Rizal to become a memorial park. The duty of the owner (living in Quezon City) of the piece of land is to provide property. The duty of the developer (located in Pasig) is to dig up the land, put drainages, etc. The owner of the land died, and the heirs are now substituting for their father. They want to rescind the agreement to develop. Where do they file?

    o There are two steps in venue problems. First, determine: is it a real action or a personal action? Its a personal action. It involves rights and obligations of parties, although the subject matter involves land.

    o Where do you file it? At the option of the plaintiffs. Either in their principal residence (Quezon City) or the defendants (Pasig)

    o Which court has jurisdiction? RTC, because it is an action incapable of pecuniary estimation (rescission)

    x Aileen Marcos case: o In cases where there are several plaintiffs and defendants, the codal provides the word principal before plaintiff and

    defendant, so that the plaintiffs will not file the case before far-flung or inconvenient areas. o In this case, Aileen Marcos is filing a case to enforce a trust, and some nominees live in Batac, Ilocos. Marcos lives in

    Makati. She filed in Batac. o HELD: Should have filed in Makati, because she is the principal plaintiff.

    x Where do you file an action for extra-judicial foreclosure? o Extrajudicial foreclosure of mortgage is NOT a judicial action. Its not covered by the Rules of Court, but Act 2135. For

    purposes of EJ foreclosure, it should be filed where the property is located. o But the mere filing and payment of fees (for multiple properties in various areas) can be paid in one office, as long as it

    can be established that it covers all areas. But the actual sale will only be done in the place where the properties are located.

    x What about judicial foreclosure? o Rule 68 does not provide for venue for this SCA. But it is filed where the property is located. o But if it is for collection of a sum of money, file it as a personal action.

    x Where do you file an action for nullity of marriage? o RTC where the plaintiff resides, where the defendant resides, or where their conjugal home is located (special rule in

    Family Courts issuance) x What should be your first consideration? What is the general rule?

    o Rule 4 (rules of venue) applies in general, UNLESS a specific law provides otherwise. x On specific venues, as provided by law

    o Give an example. Actions for Quo warranto if the Solicitor general commences it, in can be in the SC, CA, or RTC of Manila

    o What if you want to file an action for perpetuation of testimony? This is covered by Rule 24 (deposition before action or pending appeal). Special rule: Place of residence of any expected adverse party or defendant

    o What about adoption? Where the prospective adoptive parents reside

    o What about probate? Where the deceased last resided at his time of death

    o Writ of habeas corpus on residence of minors? General rule: RTC where the minor is supposed to be found Thornton: But if unknown or cannot be found, in the CA or SC

    x Can the parties stipulate on venue? o Yes, they can. o In an ejectment case, the property is located in Cebu. Plaintiff resides in Makati, defendant in QC. Where do you

    file it? In the MTC of Cebu. Residence in general does not matter.

    o What if I file it in Makati? Yes. But what will you expect?

    x Motion to dismiss on the ground of wrong venue, coming from the defendant. But what if there was no motion to dismiss, and in the answer, there was no allegation of improper

    venue? x There is waiver on the rules of venue.

    x Remember Rule 9, Section 1. This is the general rule on waivers and objections on grounds not raised in an answer or MTD. Failure to raise these grounds in MTD or answer is a waiver. Exceptions:

    o 1. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter

  • o 2. Litis pendentia o 3. Res judicata o 4. Statute of limitations

    x What is the distinction that you have to make as to stipulations? o If there are no words of exclusivity, then it is only an additional venue. o If there are words of exclusivity (ex. can only be filed in Cebu, waiving all other venues), then you can only file it there. o (PBCom v. Lim is an example of a case with restrictive words)

    In this case, the stipulation on venue in the principal agreement (PN) applies to the accessory contract, which is the surety agreement which cannot exist without the prior agreement.

    x What if there was no Motion to Dismiss and no answer filed? Apparently, the defendant did not notice the improper venue, or he decided to waive it. Can the judge later motu propio dismiss the case after noticing that the venue is wrong?

    o No, he cannot motu propio dismiss the case on the ground of improper venue. (Gumabon) x Distinguish between wrong venue and lack of jurisdiction (ex. wrongly filing an ejectment case in the MTC.) Here, while the rules

    on summary procedure include MTD as a prohibited pleading, an exception is lack of jurisdiction (contra. wrong venue). x What is the local version of forum non conveniens?

    o Prohibited forum shopping (Read Bank of America)

    Summary procedure

    x 1. Filing of the complaint o In summary procedure, after filing the complaint, what can the court do?

    A) Dismiss the case outright B) Issue summons

    o What is the responsive pleading? Answer. Can you file a MTD?

    x In general, no. It is a prohibited pleading. When do you file the answer?

    x 10 days, not the usual 15. o Can the plaintiff file a reply?

    No. Its also a prohibited pleading. o What if there is no answer?

    The plaintiff can file a motion for the court to render judgment. A motion to declare the defendant in default is a prohibited pleading. Just ask the court to render judgment.

    o After the filing of the last pleading, move on to next stage. o N.B. all pleadings (complaint, compulsory counterclaim, cross-claim, answer) must be verified

    x 2. Preliminary conference. o Take note, in SP, it is NOT pre-trial but preliminary conference. o When does the court set this?

    Within period of 30 days. o What happens here?

    The parties can compromise, identify issues, etc. o Can the court render a judgment based on what was presented in the preliminary conference?

    Yes, the court can, if it is convinced at this point in time. o Assuming there is no judgment in steps 1 and 2, move to the next step

    x 3. Submission of judicial affidavits or position papers o Is there a hearing in summary proceeding or trial?

    No hearing, no trial. o Within how many days do you submit affidavits?

    Within 10 days from the receipt of the order (record of preliminary conference) o What is required for the affidavits submitted?

    Must be within personal knowledge of affiants; or else, expunge the affidavit and subject the party or counsel to disciplinary action

    o Can the court render judgment? General rule: 30 days from the filing of the last pleading

    x NOT submission for resolution, but submission of the last pleading Exception: 15 days, if the court asks for further clarificatory documents

    x What are the prohibited pleadings? o [Standard pleadings] o 1. MTD

  • Except lack of jurisdiction over subject matter Or failure to refer to lupon

    o 2. Bill of particulars o 3. Reply o 4. Motion to declare in default o 5. Memoranda o [Adding other people] o 1. Interventions o 2. Third party complaint o [Remedial pleadings] o 1. MR or MNT o 2. Petition for relief from judgment o 3. Petition for certiorari, mandamus, prohibition against interlocutory orders of the court o [Extensions] o 1. Dilatory motions for postponement

    Does this cover motion for cancellation of hearing? x If is not dilatory. But be careful with this, because the judge has to determine first if it is dilatory.

    o 2. Motion for extension of time x Jalique v. Dandan:

    o This is a case where the respondents filed a joint counter affidavit in an ejectment case, rather than a response. The MTC decided in favor of plaintiff. RTC affirmed. CA moved to have the case remanded to MTC for re-hearing.

    o HELD: Valid action by CA. The court interpreted the rules on summary proceeding liberally here, because there was presence of a responsive pleading anyway and there was challenge of the material allegations of fact in the complaint. So the MTC should have considered it.

    x Bonifacio v. Bellosillo o The judge was sanctioned here, because there was no answer, and instead of promulgating judgment, he still called for a

    preliminary conference. x Pascual v. Jovellanos

    o The defendant filed a Motion to Strike Out instead of an answer, which was, in reality, a motion to dismiss. The judge should not have granted this.

    x Boy v. CA: o May the MTC pass upon questions of ownership in an ejectment case?

    YES, only provisionally and for the purpose of resolving forcible entry/unlawful detainer cases. This is a power granted by BP 129.

    x Macasaet v. Macasaet: o In the preliminary conference, representatives appeared on behalf of the original parties (as attorneys-in-fact). This

    special authorization is a valid cause for someone else to appear in the plaintiffs or defendants behalf. o What happens when the plaintiff is absent in preliminary conference?

    Case is dismissed o What happens when the defendant does not appear?

    As if he didnt file an answer. The court can render judgment. o What is the stopgap?

    Have an explanation OR send a representative o Where does this rule come from?

    Provision on authorization does not appear in the rules on summary procedure. But the SC applied to Rule 70 suppletorily, the rules of Rule 18 on pretrial and appearance by representative.

    Small claims

    x What should a plaintiff file? o 1. Statement of claim o 2. Together with certificate of non forum shopping o 3. Authentic copies of document from which the action stems from (actionable documents)

    x Who signs the statement of claim? o The claimant. No need for the lawyer. o [Atty. Salvador: maybe this special rule is for bar flunkers to practice, because the claimant still needs to file certain

    documents he may not know how to execute] x What happens after?

    o Court files notice for defendant to submit response o Defendant has 10 days to file a response

  • o What are the formal requirements? There is already a form provided for the plaintiff and defendant to fill in. They just need to attach documents.

    o Can there be a counterclaim in a small claim action? Yes. As long as within jurisdiction of the court, and arising from the same transaction, and does not require

    joinder of third parties. x And then? [review/cross-check these rules]

    o The parties can decide for amicable settlement or judicial dispute resolution (JDR) o Can a claimant apply as an indigent litigant?

    Yes. (Aldura) o Will there be presentation of evidence?

    Yes, but it is not a strict and formal trial. You can only present the evidence attached to the claims. o Is there a preliminary conference?

    None mentioned. o Do the parties have to appear?

    Yes, or at least their representatives. Failure for the plaintiff to appear leads to dismissal without prejudice of the claim. Failure for the defendant to appear has the same effect as not filing a response.

    x What happens after JDR? o In a multi-sala court, the executive judge refers to the pairing judge for hearing and decision within 5 working days from

    referral o In a single sala court: Pairing judge hears and decides the case in the court of origin within 5 working days from referral by

    JDR judge x Are there prohibited pleadings?

    o Same as summary procedure o Except in MTD, only lack of jurisdiction over the SM is the exception. o Why is failure to refer to the lupon not an exception?

    Because the claim is below P100K (no barangay conciliation required) x Can it be appealed?

    o No. By express provision, it is final and executory. o What then, is the remedy?

    Rule 65 (petition for certiorari) because there is no plain, adequate, speedy remedy

    Pleadings

    x What must be in the complaint? o Claims a cause of action o Must contain allegations brief and concise statement of ultimate facts, devoid of evidentiary matters

    You can also allege as to fraud, mistake, malice, illegality, condition of the mind, etc. x As to matters of fraud, how must it be alleged?

    o With particularity x As for mistake, how must it be alleged?

    o With particularity x If its a condition of the mind (malice, intent, knowledge, etc.)?

    o Generally x You can also base your claim on an actionable document. How to do you allege it?

    o 1. You can attach or append the document To show the court that this is where your cause of action arises

    o 2. You can reproduce the contents of the document in the pleading en toto (But in practice, just always append anyway)

    x How do you deny an allegation under an actionable document? o Specifically denied, under oath o What is the exception to the oath requirement?

    1) When the adverse party is not a party to the instrument 2) When there is an order for inspection and it is refused

    x What is the effect of failure to specifically deny under oath an actionable document? o It is an admission ONLY as to the genuineness and due execution of the actionable document

    x But what about the rights and obligations of the parties arising from that document? o It is up to the court to determine it.

    x What is the period for a motion to strike out a pleading or a matter contained therein? o 1. Before responding to a pleading

  • o 2. If no responsive pleading is allowed, then within 20 days of service of that pleading upon him o 3. Upon courts initiative, at any time o What are the grounds to strike out a matter from a pleading?

    1. Sham or false 2. Redundant, immaterial, impertinent 3. Scandalous

    x What is the period to file an answer?

    o 15 days after service of summons o Could it be 30 days after receipt of summons?

    For foreign corporation and service is done to government official designated by law x What is the period to answer an amended complaint?

    o A. If amended as a matter of right, 15 days from service of copy of the amended pleading (N.B. not from summons anymore since the defendant has already been summoned)

    o B. If not a matter of right, 10 days from notice of order admitting it N.B. This is not from receipt but notice of admission because the proposed amended pleading is attached to the

    motion to amend the complaint anyway. x What if there is no new answer filed?

    o The prior answer serves as the new answer too if no new one is filed x What are the defenses available in answer?

    o 1) Affirmative defense If you only hypothetically admit, without raising any defense, what happens?

    x In this case, there is no more issue. This will lead to a judgment on the pleadings (Rule 34) x This occurs when the answer does not tender an issue or admits the material allegations

    o 2) Negative defense Specific denial of facts alleged essential to the cause of action. What are the kinds of specific denial?

    x 1) general denial x 2) specific denial x 3) disavowal of knowledge (lack of knowledge and belief to form a specific denial)

    o What is a negative pregnant? A denial which implies its affirmative opposite by seeming only to deny a qualification of the allegation and not

    the allegation itself (Ex. I have never consumed cocaine while on duty implies the defendant has consumed cocaine otherwise)

    x Is the counterclaim or cross-claim in a separate pleading?

    o No. x What is a compulsory counterclaim?

    o Arises out of the transaction constituting subject matter of the action and does not require the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquired jurisdiction

    x What is a permissive counterclaim? o Arising from an event unrelated.

    x What is the period to answer a counterclaim? o 10 days o (In practice, you only answer a permissive counterclaim. In practice, a compulsory counterclaim is not answered.)

    x What is the remedy of the other party if the facts from which the counterclaim arises from only came about or ripened after the answer has been filed?

    o With leave of court, may be presented as a counterclaim (or cross-claim) by supplemental pleading before judgment x What is a cross claim?

    o Made against a person/party on the same side. x Can there be a counterclaim defendant cross claim?

    o Yes. The counterclaim defendant is the original plaintiff. He can file a cross claim against a co-party. x Is there a period to answer a cross claim?

    o 10 days x Do you need leave of court to file a counter or cross claim?

    o No, whether it be a permissive/compulsory counterclaim or a cross claim, no. x For a third party complaint, do you need leave of court?

    o Yes. You cannot just file a third party complaint. o Who is usually the third party plaintiff?

  • The defendant in the main case, who feels that he should file a complaint against someone that court has yet to acquire jurisdiction from.

    This is the reason why there is need for leave of court. You need to have the third party impleaded. Why would you want a third party complaint?

    x To contribute or indemnify o Classic case: car crash a hit b hit c. C sued B. B sued A for indemnification.

    x Subrogation x Any other similar ground

    o What is the period to answer a third party complaint? 15 days, because it is treated as an entirely new complaint

    x Is the reply a mandatory pleading?

    o No. x What is the period to file a reply?

    o 10 days. x What do you do in a reply?

    o To controvert the new matters raised in the answer x What is the effect of failure to file a reply?

    o All new matters stated in the answer are deemed controverted x What happens after answer, etc?

    o Pre-trial

    x Three important things: o Signature, verification, and CNFS

    x What is the effect of a lawyer affixing his signature in a pleading? o 1. He has read the pleading o 2. To the best of his knowledge, the information is correct o 3. The filing of the same is not for the purposes of delay

    x There are some pleadings that are left unsigned. What happens? o It has no legal effect at all. o Is there a way to cure it?

    If counsel can show it is due to mere inadvertence and not for delay o Will the court just give effect to the pleading or will it still require actual signing?

    [Didnt answer] x If a lawyer changes his address, what is his duty?

    o Inform the court. Failure to do so may lead to disciplinary action. x What are the contents of the verification?

    o Affidavit stating: o 1. That the affiant has read the pleading o 2. The allegations are true and correct based on personal knowledge or authentic records

    Based on personal knowledge, not information and belief or knowledge, information and belief x Must it be under oath?

    o Yes. x Is it mandatory?

    o No. Only when the law requires you to verify. o Give examples:

    Rule 45 (Petition for review on certiorari) Rule 65 (Petition for certiorari) Rules 57-61 (Provisional remedies)

    x Is it jurisdictional? o No. Failure to attach is not fatal. o But why do the SC and CA dismiss cases for failure to attach verification?

    Although it can be cured, the court may dismiss a pleading for failure to comply with procedural requirements. x Who signs the verification?

    o The party filing the pleading. x Can the lawyer sign it?

    o General rule, no. Unless there is some compelling reason. o For example, the partys father is to be buried on the day of filing of the petition the court allowed it.

  • o Also, the distance of the petition from the counsel (ex. the petitioner is in the USA and the counsel is in Manila, and there are only 15 days to file.)

    x Can a minor sign? o Must be assisted.

    x Can a married person sign by himself or herself? o One spouse is enough, but only if there is common interest. (N.B. but see note below)

    x For co-owners or those in the same residence? o Signature of one is enough if there is common interest. (N.B. but see note below)

    x TAKE NOTE: The key when it comes to multiple parties, all of them have to sign. However, if there is a common interest among the parties, a signature of a number of them may be enough.

    o BUT in practice, do not take chances. x When is a verified pleading/motion needed?

    o 1. Rule 24 (depositions pending action/depositions pending appeal) o 2. Rule 38 (petition for relief from judgment) o 3. Rule 42 (petition for review: RTC to CA) o 4. Rule 43 (appeal from quasi-judicial agency to CA)

    Also: exemption from payment of lawful fees under Rule 43 o 5. Rule 45 (petition for review on certiorari) o 6. Rule 47 (annulment of judgment (CA)) o 7. Rule 58 (application for preliminary injunction) o 8. Rule 59 (application for receivership) o 9. Rule 61 (application for support pendente lite)

    Also: comment on the application for support pendente lite o 10. Rule 64 (review of judgments/final orders of COMELEC and COA) o 11. Rule 65 (petition for certiorari, prohibition, or mandamus) o 12. Rule 66 (quo warranto) o 13. Rule 67 (expropriation) o 14. Rule 70 (forcible entry and unlawful detainer)

    N.B. covers all pleadings, including answer, compulsory counterclaim, and cross-claim o 15. Rule 71 (petition for indirect contempt) o 16. ROP of envi cases, Part II: a) civil complaints, b) answer o 17. ROP of envi cases, Part III: a) petition for writ of kalikasan, b) return to writ of kalikasan, c) motion for ocular inspection

    or production/inspection o 18. Rule 93 (appointment of guardians) o 19. Rule 95 (petition of guardian to sell or encumber property of the ward) o 20. Rule 97 (petition to examine competency of a ward, for termination of guardianship) o 21. Rule 102 (application for writ of habeas corpus) o 22. Rule 103 (change of name) o 23. Rule 108 (cancellation or correction of entries in civil registry) o 24. Habeas data: a) petition for writ, b) written return by respondent, c) return of service by officer executing judgment o 25. Writ of amparo: a) petition, b) written return by respondent, c) motion for inspection, d) motion for production, e) o 26. Rule 126 (Sec. 26: inventory of things seized under warrant)

    x CNFS: x When is a CNFS required?

    o For a complaint or other initiatory pleading o So a compulsory counterclaim does not require a CNFS

    x What about a juridical entity? Who can sign? o [Anyone, as long as authorized by a board resolution]

    x What are the contents of the form? o 1. Plaintiff/principal party shall certify under oath that he has not filed a similar complaint involving the same issues in

    another court, tribunal, QJ agency o 2. If there is any other pending claim, provide status o 3. If he learns about similar action, report fact within 5 days to the court

    x Why does the law require that it is the party that signs? o Because it is only the party, and not even the lawyer, that knows whether there is another action.

    x For those with no separate juridical existence, who signs? o All the parties, since there is no juridical personality.

    x What is the effect of absence of CNFS? (Note: non-compliance is different from absence) o It will be dismissed. It can be re-filed because it is without prejudice.

  • x Can it be amended to cure? o No, the defect cannot be cured by an amendment. Just re-file.

    x What is the effect of non-compliance? (Note: this occurs when there is a CNFS, but you did not respect your commitment under the CNFS)

    o 1. Dismissal of the case o 2. Indirect contempt (Failure to comply with order or process of court) o 3. Administrative and criminal sanctions (since you lied under oath)

    x What if there is willful and deliberate forum shopping? o (Meaning, its not only false, but you also deliberately disregard it) o 1. Dismiss the case with prejudice

    What kind of dismissal? x Summary dismissal cannot contest

    o 2. Placed in direct contempt o 3. Administrative sanctions

    x BPI v. CA o There was a CNFS filed in the first place. What was not attached was the board resolution showing the authority of the

    Vice President to sign the CNFS on behalf of the company. This authorization was submitted on the MR. o NOTE: There was a valid CNFS. There was liberal interpretation of this provision for these reasons.

    x Donato o Here, the lawyer signed the verification, not the party. This was validly excused by the court since the party was in the

    US, and could not sign the pleading in time given the 15 day period. There was physical impossibility. o BUT as a general rule, the lawyer cannot sign.

    x Young v. Seng o There was no forum shopping, because the first case was dismissed due to lack of cause of action. When a case is

    dismissed because of that, it is without prejudice, and that party can file the same case again. o Failure to disclose this fact is not a violation of the CNFS.

    x OSM Shipping o Requires a duplicate original or CTC for the decision being appealed (here, NLRC decision) and not the prior one (Labor

    Arbiter in this case) x Tan v. Kaakbay

    o No need for a CNFS for a compulsory counterclaim x New Sampaguita

    o There was no forum shopping here, because the first case questioned whether there can be a writ of execution when the parties agreed to compromise in the first place, when the court dismissed the initial case. The second case was whether the court approved the compromise agreement in the first place. These are different.

    x Solar o Is the rule on personal service mandatory?

    Yes. The rule is priority is by personal service. If you cannot do it by personal service, you can do it by registered mail, but you have to make an explanation.

    o In this case, it was made by registered mail and there was no explanation. For this reason, the decision of the court to allow it was based on its reasonable discretion. BUT this is not the rule.

    x Musa o What are the material dates here?

    Period only commences to run from date of receipt of the decision Date of filing of the MR Date of receipt of denial of the MR

    Amendments and supplements

    x There is amendment for civil cases and there is amendment for criminal cases. x For civil cases, amendment may either be:

    o 1) As a matter of right o 2) With leave of court

    x When is it a matter right? o Before an answer or within 10 days of service of reply (if the reply is the one being amended) o What do you need to file?

    NOTICE to amend x When do you need leave of court?

    o After an answer has been made o What do you need to file?

  • Motion to amend x For criminal cases, the reference point is not an answer. Instead, it is plea.

    o Before plea, can you amend? Yes, whether as to matter of form or substance

    o After plea, can you still amend? Yes, but only as to matters of form, for as long as it will not prejudice the rights of the accused

    x Dont forget that last bit! What is the test when it will prejudice the rights of the accused, even if its a matter of form?

    x If the original defense of the accused will not change. x What is amendment to conform to evidence?

    o This is section 5 of Rule 10 o Allegations are found in the body of the complaint/answer. What is alleged must be proven. o If the evidence you presented went beyond the allegations, you may file a motion to amend the pleading to conform to

    evidence o What if evidence is objected to on the ground that it is not within the issues in the pleadings?

    1. The court may sustain the objection 2. The court may allow the pleadings to be amended if the ends of substantial justice will be served

    x There are two kinds of amendments to conform to evidence. What are these? o First kind no objection on the part of the other party. For this reason, it will be allowed even after judgment. o Second kind if the other party objects, the amendment is left to the sound discretion of the court.

    x Can you amend a complaint when it originally has no cause of action? o If in the first place there is no cause of action, no amendment will cure such an absence. o Can the court order an amendment even if there is no application to amend?

    1. Yes, if it is a mere formal (typo) amendment 2. For bill of particulars, the court can either order compliance OR an amendment 3. Motion to dismiss the court can either grant, deny, or order an amendment

    x There was an amendment of an original complaint, which was the basis for the issuance of summons. If the original complaint is amended and that is granted by the court, is there a need for issuance of new summons?

    o No, if you already lawfully obtained jurisdiction over the defendant through summons or voluntary appearance. o It is a question of jurisdiction over the person, not a question of amendment. o HOWEVER, if there are additional defendants, new summons must be served to them.

    x What is a supplemental pleading? o A pleading filed in addition to a prior one that has been filed, pursuant to new transactions, occurrences, or events that

    have arisen. o Can there be a supplemental complaint?

    Yes o Can there be a supplemental answer?

    Yes o Can there be a supplemental reply?

    Yes o Can there be a supplemental petition?

    Yes x So what is the general rule?

    o You can file a supplemental pleading as long as there are new transactions, occurrences, or events that occur after the filing of the first pleading.

    o What is the exception? Usually you cannot do this to the Supreme Court, because you cannot file something to it unless it asked for it.

    You would be asked to explain why you are submitting such. x What is the difference between amendments and supplements?

    o Amendments pertain to events, transactions, or occurrences that exist during the filing of the original pleading, but were not placed in the pleading. There was just an omission.

    May be filed without leave of court (before responsive pleading) o For supplements, the events, transactions, or occurrence only arose after the filing of the original pleading.

    Always with leave of court x What is the period to respond to a supplemental pleading?

    o 10 days from notice of order admitting the supplemental pleading

    Default

    x N.B. 1: What is the rule on objections?

  • o General rule: all objections on grounds not raised in an answer or motion to dismiss are deemed waived. o What are the exceptions?

    1. Lack of jurisdiction over SM 2. Res judicata 3. Litis pendentia 4. Prescription

    o What is the fifth exception provided by jurisprudence? 5. Lack or absence of cause of action

    x This is different from Rule 16 (that the pleading states no cause of action) x N.B. 2: What is the rule on failure to allege a counterclaim?

    o Any compulsory counterclaim or cross claim not set-up: barred forever o In special proceedings a claim against the estate must be made in the period provided for in the notice.

    Otherwise it will be forever barred. What is the exception? If there was a suit started by the estate against you, the claim can be raised as a counterclaim.

    x N.B. 3: How many kinds of default do we have? o 1. In actions in rem, there is a general order of default.

    There are no defendants, so notice is made to the public that all oppositors have to come forward and object. Otherwise, forever barred.

    o 2. Failure to attend during pre-trial Called as in default in the 1964 Rules of Court If the defendant fails to attend, the plaintiff can present evidence ex parte

    o 3. Failure to file answer x What are the requisites to declare the other party in default?

    o 1. Did not file answer o 2. There is proof of such failure

    You have to show the return o 3. File motion with court, with notice to defending party

    x Upon order of default, what are the options of the court? o 1. Can render judgment

    No need to present evidence ex parte anymore in this case. What is the extent of relief that can be awarded by the court?

    x Not exceed the kind or amount from that prayed for x Cannot award unliquidated damages

    N.B. This is a new provision introduced only in the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure. This has not been asked in the Bar examination yet. So be careful.

    o 2. Can require submission of evidence Can delegate this to the clerk of court

    x How can you set aside an order of default? o 1) File a motion on any of these grounds:

    1. Fraud 2. Accident 3. Mistake 4. Excusable negligence

    o 2) It has to be under oath o 3) State that you have a meritorious defense, without necessarily giving an answer o What kind of fraud is needed?

    Extrinsic fraud. o Is the fraud needed here the same fraud needed for motion for new trial, petition for relief from judgment, and

    motion for annulment of judgment? YES. For all of these, you need extrinsic fraud.

    x How do you set aside an order of as in default [or allowance for plaintiff to present evidence ex parte for the plaintiff]? o Saguid: Remedy is to file an MR or relief from order of default also on the ground of FAME o Do you have to add that you have a meritorious defense?

    No need. Youre already in pre-trial. x Can there be partial default?

    o Yes. o In a case where you file a case against A, B, C, D, and E. E did not file an answer, while A to D did. Will A to D be

    allowed to present evidence? Yes.

    o Will E be allowed to present evidence?

  • No. He is in default. o Can A to Ds evidence be used against E or in favor of E?

    Yes. In fact, E can still win the case along with the others. x Where can there be no order of default?

    o 1. Nullification/annulment/legal separation o 2. Summary Procedure

    N.B. When there is failure to file answer, there can be judgment rendered by court. o 3. Certiorari, Prohibition, etc. Some SCAs require a comment, so there can be no declaration of default

    Are there SCAs where there can be declaration of default? x Yes, like interpleader where the special rules are deficient so there is suppletory application of the ROC

    x Cerezo v. Tuazon: o Order of default failure to submit an answer, so the defendant is declared in default o Judgment by default after the defendant is given notice of the court processes, the court renders a decision without

    hearing defendants defense, which he lost o Remedy for an order of default?

    Motion to set aside or lift an order of default based on FAME (under oath, and you have to show you have a good defense)

    SSS v. Chavez: This must be accompanied by a verification (under oath), affidavit of merit (that you have a good defense), and notice of hearing. If this is missing, the motion is lost.

    o Remedy for a judgment by default? 1. MR or MNT (FAME) within period for filing an appeal 2. Petition for relief from judgment

    x After the reglementary period for appeal; i.e. when there is entry of judgment x Period: 6 months from entry of judgment AND within 60 days from knowledge

    3. Rule 65 certiorari x If there is GADALEJ

    x Remington Steel: o When there are multiple defendants, even if one has already answered, you may amend the complaint as a matter of right

    as to the other since there is no defense yet that would be affected or altered by the amendment. x Philippine Export and Foreign Loans:

    o When it is a dismissal without prejudice, appeal is not a remedy. Your remedy is to re-file a case or file for a petition for certiorari.

    o Amendment to conform to evidence What if it was not allowed, but the evidence was proven, can there be a valid judgment based on that evidence?

    Yes. It is valid, even if it is not consistent with what was alleged.

    Bill of particulars

    x Can there be Bill of Particulars in criminal cases? o Yes. Rule 116, Sec. 9.

    x Only four things to remember in BOP: o 1. What is the definition of BOP? o 2. What is the period to file a BOP? o 3. What is the action taken by the court in BOP? o 4. What is the consequence of failure to comply with order to file a BOP?

    x When you file for a BOP, what do you want to achieve? o A more definite statement of facts that appear in the complaint that are not averred with sufficient particularity o You are to identify the defects and the details desired.

    x Can you file a motion for BOP after an answer has been filed? o No more, because issues have already been joined.

    x What is the effect of filing a motion for BOP on the period? o The period is interrupted upon filing, but you always have at least five days to file the answer after.

    x Deadline to file an answer is in 15 days. You received the complaint December 1. You filed a motion on December 5. How many days do you have?

    o TWELVE, not eleven. You dont count the day causing the interruption. [VERY IMPT] o This is the same way you count a motion to dismiss.

    x [Same facts] If you filed a motion for bill of particulars on December 14, the motion is interrupted. How many days do you have?

    o You still have Five days. x What can the court do?

  • o 1. Grant motion o 2. Deny it o 3. Allow the parties to be heard

    x What if the court grants the BOP? o The party directed to do so must comply within 10 days

    x What action can the court take on a BOP if you fail to comply? o 1. Motion to strike out o 2. The case can be dismissed (Virata v. SB) Rule 17, Sec 3: non-compliance with court order

    x What if the person fails to file an answer in the time left? o Will be declared in default

    Filing and service of pleadings

    Filing

    x What are the modes of filing? o 1. Personal o 2. Registered mail

    x Can there be filing by ordinary mail? o None. Because here there is no way the court can find out when you filed it. o But there can be service by ordinary mail.

    x What are the requirements for personal and registered mail? o PERSONAL: Stamped, dated, and signed by the clerk of court. o REGISTERED MAIL: Pay for registry receipt and you have to accomplish a return card

    x What is the proof that you personally filed? o 1. Primary: if the pleading is found in the records of the court. o 2. If it does not appear, you can present the received copy

    x What is your proof of registered mail filing? o 1. Registry receipt o 2. Affidavit of the person mailing o 3. Return card

    Service

    x What are the modes of service? o 1. Personal o 2. Registered mail o 3. Ordinary mail

    x What does rule 14 cover? o 1. Party serving to another party, o 2. Party serving to court, o 3. Court serving notices (section 9)

    x If the person to whom you are serving is not available, then how do you file substituted service? o Delivery to the clerk of court with proof of failure of both personal service and service by mail.

    N.B. This is different from substituted service of summons, which is to a person of suitable age and discretion residing in the same residence

    o There should be proof of both failure of personal service and service by mail. x What is completeness of personal service?

    o Actual delivery x What is completeness of registered mail?

    o Actual receipt or 5 days after first notice of postmaster o whichever comes first

    x What is completeness of ordinary mail? o 10 days after mailing

    x What are the proofs of personal service? o 1. Written acknowledgement of the party served o 2. Affidavit of the person serving o 3. Official return of server

    This refers to service by the court x What are the proofs of registered mail?

  • o 1. Registry receipt and affidavit of one who mailed o 2. Return card or unclaimed letter with certified/sworn copy of notice given by the postmaster to the addresee

    x What are the proofs of ordinary mail? o Affidavit of person serving

    x What if I used registered mail, but I got back the return card ALONG WITH the document itself (showing it is unclaimed). What do you do to prove delivery?

    o You have to file the return card plus the unclaimed document, plus before you file, secure a certification from the post office.

    x Take note that a return card is required by law to be filed, but in practice, we do not. x What is the priority of service?

    o Personal service is always preferred o What is the effect of filing by registered mail?

    Put an explanation why you did not serve it through personal service o What if you dont comply?

    As if the pleading was not filed. x Ser