BILIARY -ENTERIC OBSTRUCTION FROM RECURRENT...
Transcript of BILIARY -ENTERIC OBSTRUCTION FROM RECURRENT...
BILIARY-ENTERIC OBSTRUCTION FROM RECURRENT CANCER Resident(s): Osama Abdul-Rahim
Attending(s): Jeffrey Weinstein
Program/Dept(s): Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted: January 15, 2015
CHIEF COMPLAINT & HPI
Chief Complaint and/or reason for consultation Abdominal pain
History of Present Illness 57 y/o male with pancreatic adenocarcinoma s/p Whipple 8 months
prior presents with abdominal pain
RELEVANT HISTORY
Past Medical History Spinal stenosis Hypertension GERD Arthritis Anxiety
Past Surgical History “Jaw“ surgery, Whipple
Family & Social History 1 pack/day x 40 years, no EtOH or drug use
DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP
Physical Exam Mild right upper quadrant tenderness to palpation
Laboratory Data Total Bilirubin: 7 mg / dL
DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP - IMAGING
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma prior to Whipple
1 month s/p Whipple - No local or distant disease recurrence
DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP - IMAGING
8 months post Whipple there is a mass in right perinephric space (green arrow) causing afferent limb (yellow arrow) and biliary ductal dilatation (red arrow)
DIAGNOSIS
Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
CT abdomen and pelvis shows recurrent tumor in the right perinephric space
Resultant mass effect is obstructing the afferent jejunal limb causing secondary biliary obstruction, indicated by the intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and elevated bilirubin
INTERVENTION
Left hepatic internal/external percutaneous biliary drain was placed
3 days later, ductal dilatation improved but afferent jejunal limb remains dilated
INTERVENTION
Transhepatic enterography shows persistent afferent limb obstruction due to extrinsic compression
Guidewire was advanced across the obstruction
INTERVENTION
Initially, an 18 x 60 mm Wallstent was placed. Due to foreshortening, it was thought to be too short
A 14 x 100 mm Nitinol stent was deployed within the Wallstent. Contrast flowed freely through the stent
CLINICAL FOLLOW UP
Follow up CT showed improvement in both biliary ductal and afferent jejunal limb dilatation after intervention
QUESTION 1
1) Why was endoscopic guided therapy less feasible in this scenario?
A: Endoscopy is not indicated for biliary obstruction.
B: Endoscopy can never be performed following a Whipple procedure.
C: Endoscopy is technically challenging following a Whipple procedure.
D: What’s endoscopy?
SORRY, THAT’S INCORRECT.
1) Why was endoscopic guided therapy less feasible in this scenario?
A: Endoscopy is not indicated for biliary obstruction. (Endoscopy is often a good option for evaluation and treatment of biliary obstruction)
B: Endoscopy can never be performed following a Whipple procedure. (Endoscopy is sometimes possible following a Whipple and requires a double-balloon technique. It is very difficult however and often unsuccessful.)
C: Endoscopy is technically challenging following a Whipple procedure. (Due to the anatomic alterations resulting from a Whipple complicating the endoscopic approach, transhepatic approach to a dilated biliary system was a good choice for intervention in this patient.)
D: What’s endoscopy? (Small, flexible camera that enters the mouth or anus and can travel through the proximal small bowel or colon, respectively, allowing direct visualization and possible therapeutic intervention.)
CONTINUE WITH CASE
CORRECT!
1) Why was endoscopic guided therapy less feasible in this scenario?
A: Endoscopy is not indicated for biliary obstruction.
B: Endoscopy can never be performed following a Whipple procedure.
C: Endoscopy is technically challenging following a Whipple procedure. Although endoscopy is often a good option for evaluation and treatment of biliary obstruction, due to the anatomic alterations resulting from a Whipple, although endoscopy is sometimes possible using a double-balloon technique, it is very difficult and often unsuccessful.
D: What’s endoscopy?
CONTINUE WITH CASE
QUESTION 2
What are some of the more common uses of stents in the GI tract?
A: Esophagus
B: Stomach
C: Common Bile Duct
D: Colon
E: All of the above
CORRECT!
What are some of the more common uses of stents in the GI tract?
A: Esophagus (Can be used for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal rupture)
B: Stomach (Gastric outlet obstruction, pseudocyst drainage)
C: Common Bile Duct (Relieve obstruction or leak)
D: Colon (Relieve obstruction either as a bridge to surgery or for palliation)
E: All of the above
CONTINUE WITH CASE
SORRY, THAT’S INCORRECT.
What are some of the more common uses of stents in the GI tract?
A: Esophagus (Can be used for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal rupture)
B: Stomach (Gastric outlet obstruction, pseudocyst drainage)
C: Common Bile Duct (Relieve obstruction or leak)
D: Colon (Relieve obstruction either as a bridge to surgery or for palliation)
E: All of the above
CONTINUE WITH CASE
SUMMARY & TEACHING POINTS
57 y/o male with recurrent metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma s/p Whipple causing afferent jejunal limb and biliary obstruction
Biliary obstruction was initially relieved with internal/external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drain placement
Persistent afferent jejunal limb obstruction was subsequently successfully relieved by placing an enteric stent transhepatically
REFERENCES
Lee JM, Han YM, Lee SY, Kim CS, Yang DH, Lee SO. Palliation of postoperative gastrointestinal anastomotic malignant strictures with flexible covered metallic stents: preliminary results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001;24:25-30.
Yim HB, Jacobson BC, Saltzman JR, Johannes RS, Bounds BC, Lee JH, et al. Clinical outcome of the use of enteral stents for palliation of patients with malignant upper GI obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:329-32.
Feretis C, Benakis P, Dimopoulos C, Manouras A, Tsimbloulis B, Apostolidis N. Duodenal obstruction caused by pancreatic head carcinoma: palliation with self-expandable endoprostheses. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:161-5