A.L BH#1 D3

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:

CH. ABDULLATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS:

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTAN

Sieve Analysis of Embankment & Sub Grade Material

Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27

PROJECT: Sampling Date

Kind of Material Testing Date

LOCATIONField Sample No.

Lab. Sample No.

Original Sourse Analyst.

Weight of Original Sample GmsWeight of Oven Dry Gms 1042.9Weight of Washed Oven Dry Gms

Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cum. Wt.Retained Cum. Retained Cum. Passing SpecificationRemarks

mm (alt.) Grms Grms % % %

75 3''

63 2 1/2"

50.0 2 "

37.5 1 1/2''

25.0 1 "

19.0 3/4 "

12.5 1/2 "

9.5 3/8 "

4.75 No. 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

2.36 No. 8

2.00 No. 10 10.4 10.4 1.0 99.0

1.18 No. 16

0.60 No. 30

0.425 No. 40 66.7 77.2 7.4 92.6

0.3 No. 50

0.18 No. 80

0.15 No. 100

0.075 No. 200 135.6 212.8 20.4 79.6

Oven Dry wt. -4 # Sieve ( Gms)

Sieve Size No.10 No.40 No.200

Passing %

CalculationsCumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash

Percent Passing = 100 - Cumulative Percent Retained

CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT:

LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER

Date (التاريخ)

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:

CH.ABDUL LATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHERN BYE PASS PHASE II MULTAN

Soils Classification /Atterburg LimitsMRD Test Method 208 -209 - 210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 - 90 - 80)

Project Sampling Date


Location Lab. Sample No.

Quantity Represented Material Used:

Sieve AnalysisSieve Size Individual Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Retained

3/4 in (19 mm) 0 0 0 100No.4 (4.75 mm) 0 0 0 100No.10 (2.00 mm) 0.9 0.9 0 99.9No. 40 (0.425 mm) 5.7 6.6 1 99.3No.200 (0.075 mm) 179.8 186.4 20 80.3

PanWashTotal 186.4

Original Wt. Gram Dry Wt. Gram Wash Dry Wt. Gram946.3

Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )Type of Test LIQUID LIMIT TEST

PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 40 32 25 18

Trial No. 1 32 24 18 1 2 3Container Number A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7Wt. of Container g 17.70 27.70 18.50 19.50 22.20 20.20 24.00Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 45.54 53.43 46.15 44.63 34.96 33.66 35.93Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 40.85 48.72 40.70 39.36 32.85 31.45 33.99Wt. of Water g 4.69 4.71 5.45 5.27 2.11 2.21 1.94Wt. of Dry Soil g 23.15 21.02 22.20 19.86 10.65 11.25 9.99

Water Content % 20.26 22.41 24.56 26.54 19.85 19.65 19.40

Avg. 23.44 19.63

Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 24.40 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 19.63

Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 4.77 Classification Group A-4

CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT CONSULTANT

LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER

Cumulative Percent Retained

Percent Passing

10 100

17.00

18.00

19.00

20.00

21.00

22.00

23.00

24.00

25.00

26.00

27.00

28.00

29.00

30.00

No. of Blows

Wate

r C

on

ten

t %

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025


NAZIR & COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT

FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN

California Bearing RatioMRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)

Page 1 Of 2

Road Name FATIMA JINNAH TOWN Field Sample No.Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling

2/1/2010Location

B-BLOCK Date TestedSUB GRADE MATERIAL Quant. Rep.

Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27

Density DeterminationTest No. 1 2 3 Test No. 1 2 3Can No. A5 A9 B4 2128.0 2109.0 2124.0

A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 647.6 727.8 621.4 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 10997 11191 11496B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 581.9 655.2 558 Mass Mold . g 7090 6950 6940C 65.7 72.6 63.4 Mass Sample . g 3907 4241 4556D Mass Can. g 48 70.1 47.1 1.836 2.011 2.145E 533.9 585.1 510.9 Percent Moisture % 12.30 12.4 12.40F 12.30 12.40 12.40 1.635 1.789 1.908

Test No. 1 2 3Blows Per Lift 10 30 65Penetration

Molded Tested Molded Tested Molded TestedTotal Unit Corrected

CBRTotal Unit Corrected


CBRmm

Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load

Kg % Kg % Kg %

0 0 0 0 0

0.5 0.64 0.7 1.2 1.8 3.0 2.7 4.6

1 1.27 1.3 2.2 3.0 5.1 4.3 7.3

1.5 1.90 1.7 2.9 4.2 7.1 5.6 9.5

2 2.54 70.35 2.2 3.7 5.3 5.1 8.7 12.3 6.8 11.4 16.23 3.81 2.9 4.9 6.3 10.7 8.4 14.2

4 5.08 105.53 3.3 5.6 5.3 7.5 12.7 12.1 9.9 16.8 15.96 7.62 3.9 6.6 9.1 15.4 12.0 20.3

Swell ReadingDate Moldend

Test No. 1 2 3

Mold No. 1 2 3

Final Height . mm 0.42 0.34 0.21

Initial Height . mm 0.000 0.000 0.000

Difference . mm 0.42 0.34 0.21

Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43

Percent Swell % 0.36 0.29 0.18

MAX DRY DENSITY 1.899

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 12.4 %

Blows Per Lift No. 10 30 65

1.635 1.789 1.908

Soaked C.B.R. % 5.3 12.1 15.9

95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.804

C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 12.8 %

Contractor: Consultant:

Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer

Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)

Mold Volume cm3

Mass Of Water. A-B g

Unit Wet Mass. g/cm3

Mass Dry Soil . B-D gMoisture Content C/E X 100 % Unit Dry Mass. g/cm3

Sta

nda

rd L

oad

(Str

esse

s) K

g / C

m2

Per Min. Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2

PROCTOR MODIFIED

g/cm3

Dry Density g/cm3.

g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89

0

5

10

15

20

25

Penetration mm

Un

it L

oa

d (

Str

ess

) k

g /

cm

2

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:NAZIR & COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:



Page 2 Of 2Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL LOCATION: B-BLOCK

PROCTOR MODIFIEDMAX DRY DENSITY 1.915


BLOWS PER LAYER No. 10 30 65

1.635 1.877 1.980

SOAKED C.B.R. % 5 12 16

95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.819C.B.R At 93.0% of Max Dry Density 11.2 %




g/cm³

DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm3

g/cm3

1.600 1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 2.0000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Dry Density g/cc

Soa

ked

CB

R %

IMPROVEMENT&WIDENING OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY N-5 BAHAWAL POUR CHOWK (929+000) TO


CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHREN BYPASS PHASE II VEHARI ROAD TO BAHAWALPUR CHOWK MULTAN

Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)


Description Of Sample Testing DateLOCATION: Field Sample No.

LAYER: Lab. Sample No.

Analyst.

A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 8382 8755 9072 9237 9110

C Wt. Mold (gm) 4724 4724 4724 4724 4724

D 2118 2118 2118 2118 2118

E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 3658 4031 4348 4513 4386

F E / D 1.727 1.903 2.053 2.131 2.071

G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 36.0 35.5 34.0 34.5 36.2I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 336.9 302.3 313.2 302.5 308.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 322.6 285.3 290.6 275.5 274.9K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 14.3 17.0 22.6 27.0 33.2L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 286.6 249.8 256.6 241 238.7M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 5.0 6.8 8.8 11.2 13.9N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.645 1.782 1.887 1.916 1.818

11.31.917

Remraks :



Volume of Mold (Cm3)

Wet Density (gm/Cm3)

OPIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

1.508

1.568

1.628

1.689

1.749

1.809

1.870

1.930

1.990Moisture-Density Relationship

Moisture Content %

Dry

Den

sity

gm

/cm

3


CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO ABM CONSULTANT

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio

MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)Page 1 Of 2

Road Name Field Sample No.Description: Date Of Sampling

LocationDate TestedQuant. Rep.

Materials Analyst:


A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 740.2 638.0 686.3 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 10969 11310 11344B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 680.4 586.9 631.1 Mass Mold . g 6510 7090 6950C 59.8 51.1 55.2 Mass Sample . g 4459 4220 4394D Mass Can. g 70.1 65 68 2.099 1.983 2.084E 610.3 521.9 563.1 Percent Moisture % 9.80 9.8 9.80F 9.80 9.80 9.80 1.912 1.806 1.898





CBRmm


Kg % Kg % Kg %

0 0 0 0 0

0.5 0.64 1.0 1.7 1.4 2.4 2.4 4.1

1 1.27 1.3 2.2 3.0 5.0 3.9 6.6

1.5 1.90 1.7 2.8 4.2 7.1 5.3 9.0

2 2.54 70.35 2.1 3.6 5.2 5.0 8.4 12.0 6.6 11.2 15.93 3.81 2.8 4.7 6.3 10.7 8.0 13.5

4 5.08 105.53 3.2 5.3 5.1 7.3 12.4 11.7 9.7 16.4 15.56 7.62 3.8 6.5 8.9 15.0 11.7 19.8


Test No. 1 2 3

Mold No. 1 2 3




Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43





1.912 1.806 1.898

Soaked C.B.R. % 5.1 11.7 15.5






Mold Volume cm3




Sta

nda

rd L

oad

(Str

esse

s) K

g / C

m2


PROCTOR MODIFIED

g/cm3

Dry Density g/cm3.

g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89

0

5

10

15

20

25

Penetration mm

Un

it L

oa

d (

Str

ess

) k

g /

cm

2

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:CH. CONSTRUCTON COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:

SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN


Page 2 Of 2Description: Embankment 4th Layer LOCATION: 3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width




1.912 1.806 1.898

SOAKED C.B.R. % 5.1 11.7 15.5





g/cm³


g/cm3

1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.9500.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

Dry Density g/cc

Soa

ked

CB

R %



CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO. ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN


Project Sothern ByePass Multan Sampling Date

Description Of Sample Embankment 4th Layer Testing DateLOCATION: 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width Field Sample No.

LAYER: 4th Layer Lab. Sample No.

Analyst.


C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376

D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135


F E / D 1.765 1.903 2.023 2.096 2.071

G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 36.2 34.5 35.0 35.0 35.4I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 314.4 372.2 446.3 362.3 394.5J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 304.5 353.1 416.2 333.1 357.2K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 9.9 19.1 30.1 29.2 37.3L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 268.3 318.6 381.2 298.1 321.8M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.7 6.0 7.9 9.8 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.702 1.795 1.875 1.909 1.856

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 9.81.909

Remraks :






3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1.550

1.600

1.650

1.700

1.750

1.800

1.850

1.900


Moisture Content %

Dry

Den

sity

gm

/cm

3


CH. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN


Project SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN Sampling Date

Kind of Material Embankment 4th Layer Testing Date

Location 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width Lab. Sample No.

Quantity Represented Material Used: Embankment



PanWashTotal 186.4





Water Content % 21.29 23.51 25.36 27.45 20.16 20.25 20.81

Avg. 24.80 20.41






Percent Passing

10 100

19.00

20.00

21.00

22.00

23.00

24.00

25.00

26.00

27.00

28.00

29.00

30.00

No. of Blows

Wate

r C

on

ten

t %

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025



CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS:


Sieve Analysis of Embankment Material


PROJECT: Southern ByePass Sampling Date


LOCATION3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width Field Sample No.

Embankmant Lab. Sample No.





75 3'' 0 0 34.4 65.6

63 2 1/2" 0 0 48 52.0

50.0 2 " 0 0 60 40.4

37.5 1 1/2'' 0 0 0.0 100.0

25.0 1 " 131 131 13.5 86.5

19.0 3/4 " 0 0 0.0 100.0

12.5 1/2 " 0 0 99.7 0.3

9.5 3/8 " 76 36 3.7 96.3

4.75 No. 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

2.36 No. 8

2.00 No. 10 7.8 7.8 0.8 99.2

1.18 No. 16

0.60 No. 30

0.425 No. 40 -3.9 3.9 0.4 99.6

0.3 No. 50

0.18 No. 80

0.15 No. 100

0.075 No. 200 177.8 181.7 18.7 81.3



Passing %





EMBANKMENT 4TH LAYER



CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio


Road Name SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN Field Sample No.Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling

Location1+550 to 2+600 L/S Date Tested

Sub Grade 1st Layer Quant. Rep.Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27


A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 624.3 638.2 683.1 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 11155 11198 11457B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 571.0 584 626.4 Mass Mold . g 7090 6950 6940C 53.3 54.2 56.7 Mass Sample . g 4065 4248 4517D Mass Can. g 48 47.1 65 1.910 2.014 2.127E 523.0 536.9 561.4 Percent Moisture % 10.20 10.1 10.10F 10.20 10.10 10.10 1.734 1.829 1.932





CBRmm


Kg % Kg % Kg %

0 0 0 0 0

0.5 0.64 1.0 1.8 2.0 3.4 2.8 4.7

1 1.27 1.6 2.7 3.5 5.9 4.5 7.6

1.5 1.90 2.0 3.4 4.5 7.6 6.0 10.2

2 2.54 70.35 2.4 4.0 5.7 5.6 9.4 13.4 7.4 12.5 17.83 3.81 3.1 5.2 7.1 12.0 9.8 16.6

4 5.08 105.53 3.7 6.3 6.0 8.7 14.7 14.0 11.6 19.6 18.66 7.62 4.7 7.9 10.9 18.5 14.5 24.6


Test No. 1 2 3

Mold No. 1 2 3



Difference . mm 0.00 0.00 0

Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43





1.734 1.829 1.932

Soaked C.B.R. % 6.0 14.0 18.6






Mold Volume cm3




Sta

nda

rd L

oad

(Str

esse

s) K

g / C

m2


PROCTOR MODIFIED

g/cm3

Dry Density g/cm3.

g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89

0

5

10

15

20

25

Penetration mm

Un

it L

oa

d (

Str

ess

) k

g /

cm

2

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:CH. CONSTRUCTON COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:



Page 2 Of 2Description: Sub Grade 1st Layer LOCATION: 1+550 TO 2+600 L/S




1.734 1.829 1.932

SOAKED C.B.R. % 6.0 14.0 18.6





g/cm³


g/cm3

1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.9500.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Dry Density g/cc

Soa

ked

CB

R %







Description Of Sample SUB GRADE MATERIAL Testing DateLOCATION: 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Field Sample No.

LAYER: Sub Grade 1st Layer Lab. Sample No.

Analyst.


C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376

D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135


F E / D 1.767 1.914 2.036 2.126 2.088

G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 35.4 35.0 35.0 36.2 41.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 366.3 381.9 412.1 378.1 397.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 353.9 361.3 384.2 346.7 360.1K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 12.4 20.6 27.9 31.4 37.0L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 318.5 326.3 349.2 310.5 319M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.9 6.3 8.0 10.1 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.701 1.801 1.885 1.931 1.871


Remraks :






3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1.550

1.600

1.650

1.700

1.750

1.800

1.850

1.900

1.950


Moisture Content %

Dry

Den

sity

gm

/cm

3


NAZIR & COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS



Project FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 Sampling Date1/1/2010

Kind of Material SUB GRADE MATERIAL Testing Date

Location B-BLOCK Lab. Sample No.

Quantity Represented Material Used: SUB GRADE



PanWashTotal 186.4





Water Content % 22.35 24.16 26.29 28.16 20.95 20.81 20.93

Avg. 24.80 20.90






Percent Passing

10 100

19.00

20.00

21.00

22.00

23.00

24.00

25.00

26.00

27.00

28.00

29.00

30.00

No. of Blows

Wate

r C

on

ten

t %

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025



NAZIR & COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS:


Sieve Analysis of Sub Grade Material


PROJECT: FATIMA JINNAH TOWN Sampling Date

Kind of Material SUB GRADE MAERIAL Testing Date 01/01/2010

LOCATIONB-BLOCK Field Sample No.

SUB GRADE MATERIAL Lab. Sample No.





75 3'' 0 0 34.4 65.6

63 2 1/2" 0 0 48 52.0

50.0 2 " 0 0 60 40.4

37.5 1 1/2'' 0 0 0.0 100.0

25.0 1 " 161 161 13.5 86.5

19.0 3/4 " 0 0 0.0 100.0

12.5 1/2 " 0 0 99.7 0.3

9.5 3/8 " 0 0.0 100.0

4.75 No. 4 7.2 0.0 0.0 100.0

2.36 No. 8

2.00 No. 10 9.5 9.5 0.8 99.2

1.18 No. 16

0.60 No. 30

0.425 No. 40 81.2 90.7 7.6 92.4

0.3 No. 50

0.18 No. 80

0.15 No. 100

0.075 No. 200 37.0 127.7 10.7 89.3



Passing %












Description Of Sample SUB BASE MATERIAL Testing DateLOCATION: 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Field Sample No.

LAYER: Sub Grade 1st Layer Lab. Sample No.

Analyst.


C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376

D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135


F E / D 1.767 1.914 2.036 2.126 2.088

G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 35.4 35.0 35.0 36.2 41.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 366.3 381.9 412.1 378.1 397.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 353.9 361.3 384.2 346.7 360.1K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 12.4 20.6 27.9 31.4 37.0L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 318.5 326.3 349.2 310.5 319M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.9 6.3 8.0 10.1 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.701 1.801 1.885 1.931 1.871


Remraks :






3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1.550

1.600

1.650

1.700

1.750

1.800

1.850

1.900

1.950


Moisture Content %

Dry

Den

sity

gm

/cm

3



CH.ABDUL LATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PART:II MULTAN



Description Of Sample Testing Date

Field Sample No.Lab. Sample No.

Analyst.


C Wt. Mold (gm) 4836 4836 4836 4836 4836

D 2118 2118 2118 2118 2118


F E / D 2.056 2.203 2.298 2.393 2.310

G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-1H Wt. of Container 48.0 65.0 47.1 62.4 70.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 573.9 613.4 639.6 643.1 619.5J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 558.6 591.3 610.3 607.7 580.7K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 15.3 22.1 29.3 35.4 38.8L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 510.6 526.3 563.2 545.3 510.6M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.0 4.2 5.2 6.5 7.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.996 2.114 2.184 2.247 2.147


Remraks :


LAB TECNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER




2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1.850

1.900

1.950

2.000

2.050

2.100

2.150

2.200

2.250


Moisture Content %

Dry

Den

sity

gm

/cm

3


CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio


Road Name SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN Field Sample No.Description: SUB BASE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling

Location0+175 to 1+250 L/S Date Tested

Sub Base 1st Layer Quant. Rep.Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27


A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 674.5 594.5 608.1 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 11466 11690 12162B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 639.6 563.6 576.8 Mass Mold . g 6950 6940 7090C 34.9 30.9 31.3 Mass Sample . g 4516 4750 5072D Mass Can. g 76 65 64 2.141 2.236 2.383E 563.6 498.6 512.8 Percent Moisture % 6.20 6.2 6.10F 6.20 6.20 6.10 2.016 2.106 2.246





CBRmm


Kg % Kg % Kg %

0 0 0 0 0

0.5 0.64 4.4 3.1 11.0 7.7 14.2 9.9

1 1.27 7.3 5.1 17.9 12.5 23.1 16.1

1.5 1.90 10.0 6960.0 24.3 16.9 31.2 21.7

2 2.54 70.35 12.3 8594.7 12217.0 28.6 19.9 28.3 37.8 26.3 37.43 3.81 15.6 10.9 35.6 24.8 47.2 32.9

4 5.08 105.53 18.2 12.6 12.0 42.1 29.3 27.8 55.6 38.7 36.76 7.62 22.0 15.3 51.0 35.5 67.3 46.8


Test No. 1 2 3

Mold No. 1 2 3




Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43





2.016 2.106 2.246

Soaked C.B.R. % 12.0 27.8 36.7


C.B.R At 98% of Max Dry Density #REF! %




Mold Volume cm3




Sta

nda

rd L

oad

(Str

esse

s) K

g / C

m2


PROCTOR MODIFIED

g/cm3

Dry Density g/cm3.

g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Penetration mm

Un

it L

oa

d (

Str

ess

) k

g /

cm

2

AN ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL &SOIL TESTING

ATTERBURG'S LIMITSBH # 1

LOCATION: Plot #61,ST# Jinnah Blved,Sector#A,PH#II DHA Islamabad. Sample Depth : 03 ft

Sampling Date: 05/10/2011

946.3 Testing Date : 08/10/2011


PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 35 26 17

Trial No. 1 2 3 1 2 3

Container Number 4 5 6 A4 A2 A3

Wt. of Container g 9.00 13.70 12.50 5.00 5.50 6.00

Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 16.23 23.60 20.85 12.50 17.20 15.80

Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 14.62 21.25 18.74 11.07 14.88 13.99

Wt. of Water g 1.61 2.35 2.11 1.43 2.32 1.81

Wt. of Dry Soil g 5.62 7.55 6.24 6.07 9.38 7.99

Water Content % 28.65 31.13 33.81 23.56 24.73 22.65

Avg. 31.20 23.65

Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 31.20 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 23.65Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 7.55 Classification Group CL-ML

TESTED BY:--------------------------- CHECKED BY:---------------------------

LABORATORY

PROJECT: Sub-soil Investigation of Plot of Capt. Arshad M.Nasir.

10 100

26.00

27.00

28.00

29.00

30.00

31.00

32.00

33.00

34.00

35.00

31.13

No. of Blows

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

%

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025

A.L BH#1 D3

Documents

Transcript of A.L BH#1 D3