7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
1/22
Writing for publication in journals:things I wish Id known before I got started
Nigel Harwood
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
2/22
2
What questions do you have?
Either ind ividu ally or w ith someone else, please make a
l is t of q uestions and issues that you wish to address
in todays session
Hopefully these questions/issues will be answered/covered
as we go along
We can talk about anything which hasnt been dealt with atthe end of the session, when therell be an opportunity
for extended discussion
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
3/22
3
So what should I warn you about?
The chances are youll get some kind of rejection the 1sttime you submit
In fact, youll probably get some sort of rejection even
when youre an experienced writer and youve publisheda number of articles!
However, a rejection might not be a rejection. You oftenget invited by the journal editor to make changes to your
manuscript and resubmit it
You need to be patient because it takes so long to getthe reviewers comments on your paper (two-threemonths at the minimum. Four or five months is about
averageand seven or eight months isnt uncommon!)
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
4/22
4
What else should I warn you about?
Many reviewers are very courteous and helpful
You may get comments which you believe to be unfair
Youll need to draft and redraft, and write lots of differentversions of your article
You may have to write two or even three revised
versions of your article before its finally accepted
The whole process of sending the 1st version of yourarticle to the journal and seeing it appear in print maytake two or three years (I had an article accepted in
October 2010 but was told it wont appear untilSeptember2012!!)
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
5/22
5
Dont give up yet!
So far its been all bad newsbut dont give up yet
People whove never published before often have anum ber of mistaken ideas about publ ish ing . Oncethese are cleared up, things arent as bad as you
m ight have though t they w ere
Lets look at some of these common misconceptions,and correct them
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
6/22
6
Common misconceptions
Misconception
Everyone else writes better than melook howbeautifully written the articles in this journal are
Response No wonder theyre beautifully writtentheyve been
redrafted and rewritten so many times! McKay (2003),a very experienced researcher and former editor ofTESOL Quarterly, begins an article on writing for
publication by saying This is my 23rddraft! (p.91) Foran article to go through 23 drafts is unusualbutexpect it to go through four or five
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
7/22
7
Common misconceptions (2)
Misconception
If my article is rejected it means my works no good
Response
It doesnt necessarily mean this at all. The most prestigious
journals have extremely high rejection rates. McKay (2003)reports that only about 10% of manuscripts were eventuallypublished when she was editor ofTESOL Quarterly.
McKay adds, importantly, that almost half of thesubmissions were not at all appropriate for the journal to
begin with (p.99), and she didnt even send them out toreviewers
So if your article is rejected, it may be because youre tryingto publish in the wrong journal. Get your supervisors helpwith choosing the right journal, or an experiencedcolleagues advice
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
8/22
8
Common misconceptions (3)
Misconception
If my articles rejected by one journal, that means no journalwill accept it
Response
Probably everyone whos ever published anything has had anarticle rejected by one journal but accepted by another journal
This doesnt mean that if you get a rejection you shouldautomatically send your article unchanged somewhere else.You should read the reviewers criticisms carefully, perhapsgive your article and the reviewers comments to a trustedcolleague for comment, and then decide whether to changethe article and resubmit it to the 1st journal again.
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
9/22
9
Common misconceptions (4)
Misconception
All western journals are equally hard to get published in
Response
I wouldnt agree with thissome journals are harder toget into than others, and their reviewers and editors aremore demanding
A common method of trying to get an article published isto make a shortlist of suitable journals which publish the
kind of article youve written, and then to draw up apecking order in terms of prestige
You may have no idea about what the pecking order inyour field looks likebut your supervisor will know, soask him/her
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
10/22
10
Common misconceptions (5)
(Partial) Misconception
Im a non-native speakerso itll be even harder for me
to get published than it would be for a native speaker.
Reviewers will see my English isnt perfect, and willreject my article because theyre prejudiced
Response
I dont think this is a total misconception: some reviewers
probably are prejudiced. However, I dont believe youshould be pessimistic if youre not a native speaker,
because there are things you can do to lessen any
potential prejudice.
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
11/22
11
Non-native authors and prestigious
journals Top quality journals reject the vast majority of
manuscripts submitted for publication:
several of the editors of mainstream British and northAmerican physics, chemistry, and biology journalsGosden (1992) corresponded with put the rejection
rate at over 70% Swales (1990) claims that the figure is even higher in
the arts and humanities at 80-95%
This helps to explain why the editors in Gosden's (1992)
study admitted they were, in effect, 'looking for reasonsto reject manuscripts', and that 'linguistic grounds [were]as good a reason as any for rejection' (p.129).
However, there are th ings you can do to lessen any
difficulties you may have
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
12/22
12
Non-native writers:
publishing strategies
Journals are beginning to offer a proofreading service to
non-native authors. The journal English for Specific
Purposes, for instance, offers to provide Japanese
authors with a list of people who can check and improve
the English of an article before submission
Get a native speaker in your field to proofread your
manuscript (If theyre not in your field, they probably
wont understand the articleand they may make
inappropriate changes)
Consider collaborating with your supervisor/a nativespeaker and co-authoring your paper
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
13/22
13
Interpreting editors cover letters
Take a look at the handou t of th ree examp les o f
editors cover letters
Ident i fy w here the edito rs are giv ing th e autho r(s)
encouragement! How is th is done? What language is
used?
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
14/22
14
Mixed messages
with their first experiences of submitting papers tointernational journals for publication, students may approachme with their referees reports, explaining that they generallyunderstood the scientific points of discussion, but they werenot quite sure what they were being invited to do, often due to
conflicting signals. For example, one of the papers in thecorpus was described as interesting, carefully studied, andsound enough; but then the referee went on to comment thatthe basic idea underlying the research could hardly beunderstood. Learning to decipher the lines and inferences
between the lines of referees commentsareskills whichrequire considerable practice. (Gosden 2003: 99)
Again, I suggest your supervisor or someone whosexper ienced at publ ishing in y ou r f ield w i l l be the best
person to turn to when trying to interpret these mixed
messages
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
15/22
15
The publishing process:
from start to finish
On the handout Ive sketched out what the process ofwri t ing a journal ar t ic le m ight look l ike from your 1s t
draf t al l the way through to pub l icat ion
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
16/22
Reviewers comments
What cr i ter ia do reviewers use when
evaluating manuscr ip ts?
Take a look at the instru ct ion s to reviewers
prov ided by Jou rnal of Pragmat icsand
Journal of Second Language Writ ing
16
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
17/22
17
Responding to reviewers
comments
Normally editors ask you to carefully record how youve
responded to reviewers comments. I suggest more
rather than less detail is better here (within reason!); and
that you should go through EACH of the reviewers
comments in turn in a separate document to the editor.
Heres an example of how I responded recently to a
reviewers comment
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
18/22
18
Responding to reviewers
comments: an example
Reviewer 2s Comment:I found myself wondering, in this section and again later,
why the authors had chosen to focus on the proofreaders
and not the writers themselves (or both).
Authors Response:As the reviewer points out, there are other parties directly
or indirectly involved or affected by proofreading. We point
this out towards the end of our paper, where we discuss
our future research plans which involve these other parties.
However, we have added a footnote to our introductory
section so that the point is made sooner rather than later
that there are other parties involved. We also make clear in
this footnote why we started our research on proofreading
with the proofreaders.
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
19/22
19
Writers stories
Hopefully this handout of a few stories of writersexper iences o f the publ ish ing p rocess m ay help
some of the things weve discussed so far make
more sense..
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
20/22
20
Final words
If I had to give someone whos new to publishing one
piece of advice, it would be:
Write with someone who has experience of publishing,or at least have someone like this read your work and
the reviewers comments you receive.
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
21/22
21
Discussion
Have the quest ion s and issues you no ted down at thestart of todays session been dealt with? If not, lets
discuss them now
7/28/2019 Writing for Publication in Journals
22/22
22
References
Gosden H (1992) Research writing and NNSs: from the editors. Journal ofSecond Language Writing1(2): 123-139.
Gosden H(2003) Why not give us the full story?: functions of refereescomments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of Englishfor Academic Purposes 2(2): 87-101.
Leki I (2003) Tangled webs: complexities of professional writing. In CP
Casanave & S Vandrick (eds.), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind theScenes in Language Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,pp.103-112..
McKay SL (2003) Reflections on being a gatekeeper. In CP Casanave & SVandrick (eds.), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes inLanguage Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.91-102.
Sasaki M (2003) A scholar on the periphery: standing firm, walking slowly. InCP Casanave & S Vandrick (eds.), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behindthe Scenes in Language Education. Mahwah: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, pp.211-21.
Swales JM (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and ResearchSettings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Top Related