Wage and Hour DOL Audits: Surviving Heightened Scrutiny on Pay Practices Preparing for Investigations of Minimum Wage, OT, Hours Worked and Misclassification; Leveraging Settlement Techniques
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2015
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Stephanie Dodge Gournis, Partner, Drinker Biddle & Reath, Chicago
Jeffrey M. Landes, Member, Epstein Becker and Green, New York
Alfred B. Robinson, Jr., Shareholder, Ogletree Deakins, Washington, D.C.
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-370-2805 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your
location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of
attendees at your location
• Click the word balloon button to send
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Wage and Hour DOL Audits: Surviving Heightened Scrutiny on
Pay Practices
Webinar Wednesday, February 25, 2015
1:00pm ET/12:00noon CT/11:00am MT/10:00am PT
Presented by:
Stephanie Dodge Gournis, Esq.
DRINKERBIDDLE
(312) 569-1327
Jeffrey M. Landes, Esq.
EPSTEIN BECKER GREEN
(212) 351-4601
Alfred B. Robinson, Jr., Esq.
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
(202) 263-0175
DOL’s Wage & Hour Enforcement Initiatives
DOL’s Enforcement Initiatives
The DOL’s 5-year Strategic Plan Focuses on Compliance • The DOL is continuing its “Plan/Prevent/Protect” compliance
program that requires employers to “find and fix” violations before the DOL comes knocking on the door.
• Employers are expected to develop self-audit programs, compliance action plans and follow-up analyses as part of on-going compliance.
• DOL has promised to get tough on noncompliant employers.
7
DOL/WHD Enforcement Initiatives
Specific strategic goals include: • “Detect and deter” employers who misclassify employees as
independent contractors.
• Protection of “vulnerable workers” in “high risk industries.”
• Empowering employees with tools and resources to document and report employer noncompliance. o“We can help” campaign o DOL “smartphones” app o“Bridge to Justice” campaign
8
DOL/WHD Enforcement Initiatives
New Strategies in DOL Enforcement: • Coordinated efforts with other administration agencies, such
as: IRS, OFCCP, and EEOC • Limitations on use of employee waivers • Broadening scope of compliance audits to include:
oAudits extending beyond original complaint/issue
oMultiple employer sites
oCorporate affiliates
oAny and all compliance areas covered by DOL/ other federal agencies
9
The Fair Labor Standards Act
Efforts to Target Misclassification Issues
Potential Areas of Concern for Employers
“Employee” or Independent Contractor?
Exempt or Non-Exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act?
12
U.S. DOL Partnerships with State Agencies
The Department has entered into agreements with multiple states to reduce employee misclassification and improve compliance with Wage and Hour laws.
In September 2014, the U.S. DOL awarded $10.2 million to 19 states to help finance the state unemployment insurance tax programs to identify employers that misclassify employees as independent contractors or fail to report wages paid to workers.
13
Industries Targeted
According to a 2014 NELP survey, the industries with the most prevalent instances of misclassification of workers are: • Construction;
• Real Estate;
• Home Care;
• Trucking;
• Janitorial; and
• High-tech jobs.
In April 2010, the Secretary of Labor formally announced targeting specific industries with low wage workers, including: • Construction; Janitorial Work; Hospitality; Food Services; and Home
Health Care.
May not be your clients!
14
An “employee” is an individual who, as a matter of economic reality, follows the usual path of an employee and is dependent on the business which he or she serves • No single rule of test controls, rather whether an individual is an
employee or independent contractor depends on the total activity
Common factors used to determine if an individual is an independent contractor or an employee:
oWhether the services provided are an integral part of the business oThe permanency of the relationship oThe amount of the IC’s investment in facilities and equipment oThe nature and degree of control by the “employer” oThe IC's opportunities for profit and loss oThe amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition
with others required for the success of the IC oThe degree of independent business organization and operation
15
Economics Reality Test
IRS Auditing
In 2011, the DOL and the IRS signed a Memorandum of Understanding stating that the agencies will work together and share information to reduce the incidence of misclassification of employees, to help reduce the tax gap, and improve compliance with federal labor laws. • This MOU has established a practice whereby DOL misclassification cases
will normally get referred to the IRS after the investigation closes.
Unlike in the past, employers need to be especially careful because violations under one agency may lead to additional investigations in other agencies due to information sharing.
16
Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (IRS)
Available for taxpayers that want to voluntarily change the prospective classification of workers from independent contractors or other non-employees to “employees” • Eligibility Requirements
oMust have consistently treated the workers as independent contractors or other non-employees;
oCannot currently be under an employment audit by the IRS or the DOL; and
o If the employer was previously audited by the IRS or DOL, the employer must have complied with the prior order.
17
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Aggregation of Hours for Joint Employment
Meal Periods/Automatic Deductions
Overtime calculations for “Non-Discretionary”
Bonuses and Incentives
Smartphones, emails and other communication devices
Other “Off-The-Clock” Work
19
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Meal Periods • Federal law requires employees receive full compensation for
meal periods, unless: – Employee gets full 30 minute break
– The employee can use the meal period for his/her own benefit
– The meal period is not “meaningfully interrupted”
• Employers utilizing payroll systems which automatically deduct meal periods from worked shifts receive the highest scrutiny from the DOL (and class action attorneys).
20
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Meal Periods • Federal law requires employees receive full compensation for
meal periods, unless: – Employee gets full 30 minute break
– The employee can use the meal period for his/her own benefit
– The meal period is not “meaningfully interrupted”
• Employers utilizing payroll systems which automatically deduct meal periods from worked shifts receive the highest scrutiny from the DOL (and class action attorneys).
• Employers must ensure meals of are not “meaningfully interrupted” by: oAnswering employee/customer calls and questions
oMonitoring work during meal
oCarrying smartphones, pagers and other communication devices
21
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Off-The-Clock Work • Employees must receive minimum wage for all hours worked
and overtime for hours worked over 40 hours in a workweek.
• Failure to police off-the-clock work can result in significant employer liability. oPreliminary work oPostliminary work oTravel time oTraining/Education
22
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Off-The-Clock Work • Employers must account for all worked hours
including: > Work at Home:
– Returning pages – Checking email – At-home training modules
> Carrying/Monitoring Pagers/Communication Devices > Vocera lawsuits > Active monitoring of work > Interruption of meal periods/required breaks
23
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Joint Employment: • Two or more related employers that share “common control” of a single
worker will be deemed individually and jointly liable for the payment of minimum wage and overtime on aggregated hours worked for the employers in a single workweek. oApplies to:
– Affiliated corporate entities (50% ownership)
– Temporary staffing agencies
24
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Joint Employment: • All hours must be aggregated for purposes of determining whether
employee has worked more than 40 hours per week
• Regular rates must be blended to determine overtime rate
• Employees CANNOT be both: oExempt/Non-exempt
oEmployee/Contractor
oPaid Overtime 40 hours/ 8 & 80
25
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Bonuses & Incentives • The FLSA allows for just seven types of bonuses to be excluded
from the regular rate.
• All other incentives/bonuses must be added to the regular rate and used to recalculate overtime compensation, including the following: oHiring bonuses oRetention bonuses oTransition bonuses o Lump sum bonuses oPerfect attendance bonuses o Longevity pay o Service bonuses
26
Other Pay Practices Under US DOL/WHD Scrutiny
Bonuses & Incentives • General Rule: Bonuses which are paid on a regular and consistent basis
and/or are communicated to employees in advance of payment are typically non-discretionary bonuses which must be included in the regular rate for purposes of calculating overtime.
27
Exempt vs. Non-Exempt Employees
Exempt • White Collar Exemptions
oExecutive, administrative, professional, outside sales, computer employees
– Must be paid at least $23,600 per year ($455 per week) on a salaried basis; and
– Must perform exempt job duties.
If non-exempt, the employee is entitled to overtime.
The fluctuating workweek method of payment can be helpful during settlement discussion if a worker is misclassified as exempt.
28
U.S. DOL/WHD Audit Process
Preparation Before a DOL Investigation
Employers may decrease potential liability for wage and hour issues by conducting self-audits before the DOL gets involved.
In order to conduct a comprehensive self-audit, employers should: • Closely examine job descriptions to ensure they reflect the work
performed;
• Review time keeping systems, pay policy, and maintain FLSA records;
• Develop a formal employee grievance program for reporting and resolving wage hour concerns;
• Confirm that all written time keeping procedures are current, accurate, and complied with;
• Conduct employee self-assessments regarding job duties; and
• Develop a centralized system for retaining independent contractors.
30
Best Practices When Confronted with a DOL Investigation
Develop an inspection team and designate a DOL point person • The inspection team typically includes a member of senior management,
field supervisors, and wage and hour counsel
Consent to an investigation instead of demanding a subpoena
Be Aware and assert employer rights during DOL Investigations • Refusing to allow the DL investigator on site without a warrant
• Requesting 72 hours to comply with investigative demands
• Requesting that interviews and on-site inspections take place at reasonable time
• Participating in the opening and closing conferences
• Protecting trade secrets and confidential business information
• Escorting the investigator while he or she is at the workplace
31
Stages of DOL Audit: Opening Conference
Common topics discussed by the investigator in the opening meeting are: • the purpose and scope of the investigation;
• inform the employer of what documents and records they will review; and
• advise whether they plan to interview any employees.
Investigators may request a tour of the facilities being investigated • normally to ensure that the employer is complying with notice
requirements
If not previously requested, the Investigator will likely request payroll records from the previous 2-3 year period, and all written policies, practices, and procedures regarding time-keeping
32
Stages of DOL Audit: On-Site Inspection
An investigator may conduct a tour or perform an on-site inspection of the employer’s facility • The team leader or a member of the investigation team should escort the
investigator around the premises at all times the investigator is conducting the on-site inspection.
Investigators may speak with hourly employees and hand out business card to set up employee interviews
The employer may object to any impromptu on-site interviews that last more than 5 minutes because they can assert that this practice would disrupt normal business operations • Best Practice for Employee interaction during an on-site inspection
oThe person escorting the investigator should take diligent notes regarding which employees the investigator speaks to, the subjects of the investigator’s questions, and any employee that the investigator requests to interview.
33
Stages of DOL Audit: Employee Interviews
An investigator has the right to conduct employee interviews and can interview the employee in private
At the employee’s discretion, the employee may refuse to be interviewed or request that a representative of the employer be present during the interview.
Management and key employees do not have corresponding privacy rights during an interview and the employer may insist that counsel or another management official attend management interviews
Interviews should be scheduled in advance and the DOL must be reasonable in its response to time and location requests
34
Stages of DOL Audit: Closing Conference and Post-Investigation Considerations
The Closing Conference occurs at the conclusion of an investigation to inform an employer of its findings and seek an agreement if there are any violations.
Best Practices for the Closing Conference: • While an employer is expected to respond at the closing conference, an
employer may defer any statements and remain silent.
• The employer should: oAvoid agreeing to any observation of a violation, admitting guilt, or making any
promises; oConsider reviewing the findings to rebut or verify the back wage computations
and possibly submit a position statement; oDisclose any changes the employer made proactively to remedy alleged
violations; o Scrutinize the characterization of the violation and the penalty amounts; and o Look for factual errors that form the basis of the proposed violation.
35
Options for Clients at the End of the Auditing Process
After the DOL presents its findings to the employer, the employer can:
• Negotiate a settlement with the agency; or
• Litigate the claims o If an employer refuses to pay the agency, the solicitor’s office will determine
whether or not to further pursue the claims in district court.
36
Damages
Back wages in the amount of unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation
Liquidated damages, paid to the employee, equal to the amount of unpaid wages due to the employee
Employers that willfully or repeatedly violated minimum wage or overtime requirements can face up to $1,000 in civil penalties for each violation
o Intended to discourage future non-compliance and are not tied to the amount of back wage liability incurred as a result of the violation.
oCivil penalties are paid to the government.
37
State Wage and Hour Law Compliance
Industries Targeted by the NYS DOL
Focus on the Construction Industry • According to the NYS DOL, research and statistics indicate that the
construction industry has among the highest rates of misclassification of workers, leading the NYS DOL to continue targeting the construction industry for audits.
In 2014, New York State passed the New York State Commercial Goods Transportation Fair Play Act, similar to a law regulating the construction industry for misclassification of workers, because of the high rate of classification of workers as independent contractors • In an effort to decrease misclassification of Commercial Goods
transportation Workers, the NYS DOL began also targeting employers that employ commercial trucking workers for independent audits.
39
New York Common Law Test
Factors for determining whether the worker is an independent contractor or an employee • Determining whether the worker is subject to the control and supervision
of the employer in performing the job, whether the work that is performed is part of the usual work of the employer’s business, and whether the worker has an independently established business offering services to the public, similar to the service they are performing for the employer.
40
New York State DOL Damages
New York State DOL and Labor Auditing • Auditing generally begins with a written notice to the employer
• Audits can begin because of a complaint or they may be randomly initiated
There is a 6 year statute of limitation, where the NYS DOL can also investigate the employer’s compliance, among other items, with the Wage Deduction Statute and Wage Theft Protection Act • Recent amendments to the Wage Theft Protection Act increased the
penalties for failing to provide a wage notice from $50 per week to $50 per day with a maximum of $5,000. The Amendment also provides for additional penalties of up to $20,000.
41
Top Related