CAUSES AND TREATMENT OUTCOME OF NONTRAUMATIC ACUTE ABDOMEN
AMONG SURGICAL WARD ADMITTED PATIENTS IN GELEMSO ZONAL
HOSPITAL OROMIA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHOPIA
Alebachew Bere, Tesfaye Gobena, H/Georges Feleke.
ABSTRUCT
Background: Surgical acute abdomen is commonly encountered condition both in developed and
developing nations. But its relative incidence varies among populations; Socio-economic status, age, sex
and residence are the factors for observed difference. Preoperative diagnosis, preoperative care and
timely, intervention of acute abdomen is crucial to minimize the morbidity and mortality especially
where the diagnostic facilities are limited.
Objective: To assess the causes and treatment outcome of non traumatic acute abdomen among patients
admitted to Gelemso zonal hospital between Nov15, 2008 to Nov15, 2013.
Methodology: This was a Five year retrospective study conducted on patients admitted in
Gelemso Zonal hospital. A total of 415 patients diagnosed with acute abdomen underwent emergency
laparotomy was included in this study. Samples taken from all patients admitted with non traumatic
acute abdomen. Data was collected with checklist. First descriptive statistics then logistic regression
analysis were used to measure association between the dependent and independent variables. For all
statistical tests P ≤ 0.05 was used as cut off point for statistical significance.
Results: A total 415 emergency laparotomy (72.7%) were male and (28.3%) were female. The mean
age of the patients was 31.17; range of 2-82 years and with male to female ratio of 2.6:1. Acute
appendicitis was the leading cause of acute abdomen accounts 53.7% followed by intestinal
obstruction (37.4%), (PPUD) (4.1%) and other (peritonitis 4.8%). There were 49 deaths giving an
overall mortality rate of 11.8%. A higher mortality rate was observed in patients who presented
late.
Conclusion: The study shows that acute abdomen i s a commonly encountered condition surgical
emergency procedure done in the department. Appendicitis found the leading cause of non traumatic
acute abdomen operated in the hospital. A significant number of patients had died of acute abdomen
with male to female mortality ratio of 1:1.13. The overall mortality rate of acute abdomen in this study
was 11.8% which was high and could be attributed by late presentation. Early diagnosis, adequate
resuscitation and timely intervention would help to reduce the observed mortality.
1
Key word: Non traumatic acute Abdomen
INTRODUCTION
Acute abdomen is defined as a recent or sudden onset of abdominal pain that may or may not need
surgical intervention. It is a clinical condition characterized by severe abdominal pain, requiring the
clinician to make an urgent therapeutic decision, (Robin Smith et al, 2003). Abdominal pain is a
common presentation to emergency department (Dr.Marjan coal and Sina, 2009), or from surgical
point of view abdominal pain is the most cardinal symptom of acute abdomen (Mohamed Asif, 2008).
Abdominal Pain represents 5% of emergency room visits. Only 10% of these evaluations require
surgery. Acute abdomen accounts for 10% of malpractice claims (Laal, Marjan; Mardanloo, Amitta,
2009). Acute abdomen diagnosis is based on complete history taking, physical examination and
investigation tools including laboratory tests and radiological findings. The investigative modalities are
good guidance and helpful to confirm the diagnosis. For example, when suspicious to intestinal
obstruction, one can perform abdominal X-ray which would be a great help in diagnosis confirmation
or ultrasound guidance for the diagnosis of cholecystitis. A preoperative accurate diagnosis prevents
from negative laparotomy. Nowadays, despite availability of different diagnostic tools and progress in
new imaging methods like ultrasound (US) and computed tomography scanning (CT), correct pre-
operative diagnosis of acute abdomen still remains challenging (Laal, Marjan; Mardonloo, Armita,
2009).
The most common symptoms are abdominal pain and vomiting whereas tenderness and guarding are the
most frequent clinical signs (Sentayehu Tsegaye et at., 2006). The causes of acute abdomen are several
and their relative incidence varies in different populations. Several factors are described to be
responsible for these differences. Socio-economic factors and diet have mostly been incriminated to be
responsible for the observed differences (Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abdurrahman, 2006). In the
developed world acute abdomen is most common in age group 20 to 29 years with male predominance.
Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of surgical condition (Laal, Marjan; Mardonloo, Armita,
2009). On the other hand in several African countries the leading cause of acute abdomen was intestinal
obstruction. The leading cause of intestinal obstruction in Africans has mostly been hernia and volvulus
whereas adhesions are most frequent in the developed world. There is however some African studies
which are pointing to a change in these established patterns (Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abdurrahman,
2006). In Ethiopia, very little is known about the causes and the treatment outcome of non traumatic
acute abdomen. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing the causes, and treatment outcome
of non traumatic acute abdomen in Gelemso zonal hospital
2
General objective
1. To assess the causes and treatment outcome of non traumatic acute abdomen among patients
admitted to Gelemso Zonal Hospital (GZH) between November15, 2008 to November 15, 2013.
Specific objectives
1. To assess the most frequent causes of non traumatic acute abdomen in Gelemso zonal hospital.
2. To determine the outcomes of non traumatic acute abdomen in Gelemso zonal hospital.
Study Area and Period
This study was conducted at Gelemso Zonal Hospital which is found 376 km East from Addis Ababa
and 270 km from Harar. The hospital is found in Chiro Zone at Habro district. The number of beds in the
hospital is 141. The study was covered five year hospital based retrospective study between Nov15,
2008 to Nov 15, 2013 and data was retrieved from the chart of the patients from Februray15, 2014 to
March 30, 2014. The Study population were all patients who admitted to surgical ward with diagnosis of
non traumatic acute abdomen and operated at GZH from Nov15, 2008 to Nov15, 2013.
Sample size determination
Sample size was calculated using the single population proportion technique based on the following
assumptions, estimated proportion (P) = (43.4%), Z=95%CI (1.96), d=5% and non respondent 10%=38.
So that total sample size (n) = 377+38=415
Sampling techniques
The study subjects’ charts were selected by systemic random sampling technique. The list of the patient
on the log book was used as sampling frame. Then from the total 910 patients, 415 patients’ chart were
selected, K=N/n, thus every other chart was selected. The first char was selected by lottery method.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
There were 415 patients diagnosed with acute abdomen underwent emergency laparotomy were
retrieved which formed the basis of this study. Data was processed by carrying out descriptive
statistical tests, like frequency, mean and range; then bivariate using crude odds ratio with 95%
confidence interval, cross-tabulation chi-square test and finally multivariate logistic regression model
used to determine the independent factors of the outcome variable. For all statistical tests P value < 0.05
was taken as a cut off point for statistical significance. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS
version 20.
Study variable
Dependent variable: Treatment outcome of non-traumatic acute abdomen (improved or death).
3
Independent variables: Age, sex, residence, awareness, underline diseases, cause of obstruction, duration
of illness, malnutrition or diet, skilled health personnel, X.ray, ultra sound and other
RESULTS
4.1 Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
A total 415 patients diagnosed with acute abdomen underwent emergency laparotomy was included in
this study from these 299 (72.7%) were male and 116(28.3%) were female. About 71.6% of patients in
this study found between 18 to 50 years old and mean age of the patients was 31.17, a range of 2-82
years and with male to female ratio of 2.6:1. Majority of patients 354(85.3%) came from rural area and
61(14.7%) came from urban.
Table 1. Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of study population in GZH, 2014 (n=415)
Characteristics Number Percent
Age Category by year
0 – <18 81 19.5
18– 50 297 71.6
>50 37 8.9
Sex
M 297 72.7F 116 28.3
ResidenceUrban 61 14.7
Rural 354 85.3
4.2. Clinical Features of Acute Abdomen
As indicated on Table 2, abdominal pain and vomiting were the most frequent symptoms (100% and
77% respectively) whereas tenderness and distention were the most frequent clinical signs (77.8%
and 53.5% respectively).
4
Table 2. Clinical features of non traumatic acute abdomen in GZH, 2014
Clinical Feature and Frequency.
Symptoms Number % Signs Number %
Abdominal pain 415 100 Tenderness 323 77.8
Abdominal distention 212 51 A/distention 222 53.5
Vomiting 319 77 hypotension 203 48.9
Constipation 231 56 Empty rectum 123 29.6
Others 41 10 Other 64 15
As shown on Figure1, from total of 415 emergency operated, acute appendicitis was the most common
cause of acute abdomen 223(53.7%) followed by intentional obstruction 155(37.4%), perforated duodenal
ulcer 17(4.1%) and other 20 (4.8%). Acute appendicitis accounted for just over half of the cases
( 53.4%), of whom 153 (68.6%) were males and 70 (31.4%) were females (M: F =2.2:1) and the
mean age of the patient was 31.2 year
5
Percent
Figure 2: Causes of acute abdomen in GZH, 2014 (N=415)
The frequency and causes of intestinal obstruction are shown on table3; Small bowel obstruction due
to adhesion was the leading causes of intestinal obstruction 27% followed large bowel due to
sigmoid volvulus 26.5%, small bowel volvulus 21.9%. Intussusceptions 11%, ileo- sigmoid knotting
5.8% and hernia2.6%
Table 3.The frequency and causes of intestinal obs t ruc t ion in GZH 2014 (n=155)
Cause of intestinal obstruction Number of cases
NUMBER %
Large Intestinal
Obstruction .
Sigmoid volvulus 41 26.5
Ileo- sigmoid knotting 9 5.8
Caecal volvulus 8 5.2
Small
Intestinal
Obstruction
Adhesion 42 27
Volvulus 34 21.9
Intussusceptions * ( I-I, I-C, &I_S 17 11
Hernia 4 2.6
* Intussusceptions: I-I =Ileoilial, I-C =ileocolic and IS=ileosaecal
As indicated in the Table 4, patients whose age greater than fifty years were found the leading mortality
(27%). From a total of 49 deaths, 45 (12.7%) found in rural and only 4(6.6%) found in urban. The
mortality ratio of acute abdomen in this study was 11.8 with male to female ratio of 1:1.13.
Table 4: Mortality of non traumatic acute abdomen by age, sex and residence category in
GZH, 2014(n=415)
CharacteristicSurgical Outcome of acute Abdomen
TotalImproved Died Number % Number % Number %
Age <18 year 18-50year
>50year
Total
70 86.4
269 90.6
27 73
366 88.2
11 13.6
28 9.4
10 27
49 11.8
81 19.5
297 71.6
37 8.9
415 100
SexMaleFemale
265 88.6 101 87.1
34 11.415 12.9
299 72.1 116 27.9
Residence UrbanRural
57 93.4309 87.3
4 6.645 12.7
61 14.7354 85.3
6
As indicated in Table 5 below, the leading causes of death were large intestinal obstruction 27.6%
followed by perforated duodenal ulcer (23.5%) peritonitis (20%), small bowel obstruction (18.6%) and
acute appendicitis (3.1%)
Table 5. The relationship between cause of acute abdomen and mortality GZH, 2014(n=415)
Diagnosis Died
Total cases
Intra -Operative Dx
Number %
Number
SBO 18 18.6 97
LBO 16 27.6 58
Appendicitis 7 3.1 223
PPUD 4 23.5 17
Other * 4 20 20
Total 49 11.8 415 * Peritonitis due typhoid & TB perforation.
As shown from Table, the commonest fatal cause of death was ileo- sigmoid knotting 55.6%, followed
by intussusceptions 47%; caecal volvulus 25%, sigmoid volvulus 22% and adhesion were
19.5%.There is no death observed intestine obstruction due to hernia.
Table 6. The frequency of causes of intestinal obs t ruc t ion and morta l i ty
Total cases (n)=155 Total died (34)
Cause of intestinal obstruction Number % Number % Large Bowel Obstruction due to n=58 (37.4%)
Sigmoid volvulus 41 70.7 9 22 Caecal Volvulus 8 13.8 2 25
Ileosigmoid knotting. 9 15.5 5 55.6 Small intestinal obstruction due to n=97(62.6)
Volvulus. 34 35 3 8.8
Adhesion 42 43.3 7 19.5
Intussusceptions * ( I-I, I-C, &I_S 17 17.5 8 47
Hernia
4 4.1 0 0
Intussusceptions: I-I =Ileoilial, I-C =ileocolic and IS=Ileocaecal
7
As shown from Table: patients presented to hospital early or within two days of illness found mortality
rate of 13 per 1,000, where as those presented late found mortality rate of 256 per 1,000 population.
Table7: The relationship between duration of illness and mortality in GZH, 2014(n=415)
Duration of illness All patients Patient died
Mortality
per 1000
<= 2 Days 236 3 13
> 2 Days 179 46 256
Total 415 49 118
As shown in the Table, There were 137(33%) cases that developed post operative complication.
Sepsis was the most fatal frequently identified post operative complication and cause of death 16 (55%)
followed by followed by aspiration pneumonia 5 (50%), Intra-abdominal abscess 17 (43.6) and
anastmosis leak 5(41%).
Table 8: The relationship between post operative complication and number of deaths in GZH,
2014 (n=137)
Complication observed Total cases by number
Died Number %
Intra-abdominal abscess 39 17 43.6
Sepsis 29 16 55.2
Surgical site infection (SSI) 23 3 13
Urinary tract infection (UTI 14 0 0.0
Anastmosis leak 12 5 41
Aspiration pneumonia/ARDS 10 5 50
Other 10 3 30
8
Factors Associated with the Outcome of Acute Abdomen
Crude analysis was done by applying chi-square test to asses any association between age category, sex,
residence, patient referral and duration of illness, with outcome of acute abdomen. Among these
variables age category, residence and patient referral had no significantly associated with outcome of
acute abdomen (p-value>0.05); But duration of illness and cause of acute abdomen had significant
association with outcome of acute abdomen (p-value<0.05). Moreover; Multivariate analysis also show
duration of illness and cause or operative diagnosis had significantly associated with outcome of acute
abdomen but age category, sex, residence, and patient referral had no significant association with
outcome of acute abdomen.
Table9: Association of independent variables with dependent variable
Variables
Outcome of acute abdomen COR(95%CI AOR(95%CIDied Improved
Age <18 Year 11 70 1.00 1.00
18-50 Year 28 269 0.7(0.3,1.4) 0.5(0.1,1.7)
>50 Year 10 27 2.4(0.9, 6.2) 1.3(0.1,15.8)
Sex male 34 265 1.00 1.00
female 15 101 1.2(.0605,2.216) 1.3(0.59,2.9)
Duration of illness
<=2 days 3 233 1.00 1.00
2> days 46 133 26 (8.2, 88.05) 19(5.1,72.9)
Residence urban 4 57 1.00 1.00
rural 45 309 2.1(0.72, 6) 1.2(0.31,3.7)
Referral Has referral 21 100 1.00 1.00
Self referral 28 266 0.5(0.3,0.9) 0.6(0.27,1.2)
Operative Dx
Or cause of
acute abdomen
Appendicitis 7 216 1.00
SGV 9 32 8.7(3.0,24.9)
Caecalvolvulus 2 6 10.3(1.8,60.3)
SBV 3 31 3(0.73,12.2)
Adhesions 7 35 6(2.04,18.7)*
Intussusceptions 8 9 27(8,92)
ISK 5 4 38.6(8.75,157)
PPUD 4 13 9.5(2.5,36.6)
Typh/Peritonitis 4 10 12(3.1,49)
9
DISCUSSION
Acute abdomen morbidity is more common productive age groups, for instance in this study 297/415
(71.6%) were found productive age groups (18 to 50 years old) with male predominance which is similar
study done by (Marjan caal and Sina, 2009). Acute appendicitis was the leading cause of acute abdomen
more observed in males ( 67%), than females 34% and the majority of cases were in the 2 nd and 3rd
decade of life and mortality of male to female ratio nearly similar (M:F=1:1.13). This is differ the
study done in Tikur Anbesa hospital, Gonder university hospital and Pakistan in which male to female
ratio were 3.2: 1, 2:1 and 3.3: 1 respectively .This is different is due to males in the rural more decision
maker than females to attained hospital early but not true great city. Patients in this study presented
symptom and signs of abdominal pain, vomiting and tenderness 100%, 77% and77.8% respectively. This
is similar to the study done in Tikur Anbesa and Gonder University hospital in which abdominal pain,
vomiting and tenderness were most frequent symptom and signs (Sentayehu Tsegaye et al., 2006).
In this study the operative diagnosis or cause of acute abdomen and duration of illness were
found to be strongly associated with outcome of acute abdomen. Patients whose operative diagnosis
were sigmoid volvulus found 8.7 times more likely to died as compared acute appendicitis [AOR=8.7,
95%;CI; (3.0, 24.9)] and patients who came to hospital more than two days of illness were 19 times
more likely to died as compared to those patients who came within two days of onset [AOR =19,
95%;CI;( 5.1,72.91)] which agree the study done in Tikur Anbesa hospital (Birhanu kotiso and Zeki
Abdurrahman, 2006) .The reason for late presentation to the institution delivering the s u r g i c a l
treatment needs to b e studied further. The fact that majority (85.3%) of the patients had come out
of Gelemso and far from hospital encountered different problems either due to lack of transport or
little awareness. Moreover some patients (38%) who came outside Gelemso had visited different health
institution once or more may indicate lack of appropriate institution or surgeon to handle acute
abdominal problems which in turn might have played a role in the delay presentation. As the study
done in Nigeria shows delay in hospital was due to financial constraints in majority of cases (N.Mbah et
al., 2006).
Common things that occur commonly; the most common surgical cause of acute abdominal pain in
patients admitted anywhere in the world was acute appendicitis. My study also revealed that acute
appendicitis is the most common cause followed by intestinal obstruction due to adhesion and volvulus
accounts 27% and 26.5% respectively. This study is similar to the study done in Tikur Anbesa hospital
(Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abdurrahman, 2006), in Nazareth, central Ethiopia, (Ethiopian Medical
A s s o c i a t i o n (EMA),1998), in Nigeria by Ajao and Zaire by Okoro, 1981 and1987 respectively and
10
Laal Marjan; Mardanloo, Amita,2009 also International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal
Medicine & Public Health (IJCRIMPH) shows similar results. . Thus acute appendicitis accounted for
just over half of the cases 223 (53.7%), of whom 153 (68.6%) were males and 70 (31.4%) were
females (M: F =2.2:1). The majority of the cases were in their second and third decades of life. A total
of 49 deaths, seven patients died of acute appendicitis.
The major cause of acute abdomen in this study based on residence of patients in urban acute appendicitis
(18.8%) followed by large intestinal obstruction due to sigmoid volvulus and Tuberculosis perforation
(17%) and 16.7% respectively .But in rural intestinal obstruction due to small volvulus and sigmoid
volvulus and acute appendicitis were 94%, 83%, and 81.2 % respectively. These differences due to the
causes of acute abdomen relative incidence vary in different populations at different places. As the study
done in Tikur Anbesa hospital shows socio-economic factors and diet has mostly been incriminated to be
responsible for observed difference (Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abidurhaman, 2006). Sigmoid volvulus
was the leading cause of colonic obstruction 41/58 (70.7%); from this 13.8% & 86.2% were found
urban and rural respectively. Adhesions were the most frequent cause of small intestinal obstruction
42/97(43.3), from this 85.7% rural and urban only14.3% and the second cause of small intestinal
obstruction is small bowel volvulus 34(35%).These study similar to Gonder University hospital
(Sentayehu Tsegaye et al., 2006). But in Uganda and Rwanda the leading cause of intestinal obstruction
was hernia which accounts 40.2% and 39% respectively G.Ntakiyiruta and B.Mukarugwiro, 2009. This
variation is due to populations Socio-economic status and diet was incriminated. In general leading cause
of intestinal obstruction adhesion 42/155 (27%) followed by sigmoid volvulus 41/155 (26.4%). It is also
similar in different studies in Africa as it shows sigmoid volvulus is a common cause of intestinal
obstruction (Sentayehu Tsegaye, 2006; Mohamed Kedir Ali, 1998; T.R.Okello et al., 2009). For instance
in Sudan 33%, in Zimbabwe 31%, and in Nigeria 39 %( Roberto Cirocchi et al., 2010).
The leading fatal cause of acute abdomen in this study was obstruction due to ileo-sigmoid knotting; its
mortality rate was found 55%. This is much higher than Tanzania, West Tanzania and Malawi in which
its mortality ratio were 10.7%, 29.8%, and 33% respectively. This difference is due to late presentation
and pattern of obstruction or cause of obstruction brings higher mortality.
In general leading mortality rate of acute abdomen was large bowel obstruction 27.6%, followed by
duodenal perforation, peritonitis and small intestine obstruction account 23.5%, 20% and
18.6%respectively. This result is similar by order or rank but differs by magnitude study done in Tikur
Ambesa hospital (Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abidurhaman, 2006) that 35.2%, 28.5%, 22.2% and 21.5%
respectively. In this study there is no perforated duodenal ulcer as well as death associated to peptic ulcer
disease in the urban; because patients in the urban has good health seeking behavior and early Dx and
triple therapy at this moment can prevent morbidity and mortality associated to peptic ulcer disease.
11
In this series study the mortality of patients with acute abdomen treated surgically was 11.8% which
higher than Gonder university hospital (9.3%), but good outcome compared other study done in Africa
by Datubo, Zelalem and; Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abdurhaman, 2006) (13.3%), (13.5%) and 14%
respectively. The difference is due to significant increase of health seeking behavior of the patient,
increase referral system and Proper management of surgical patients at the community.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Acute appendicitis and intentional obstruction were the common cause of non traumatic
acute abdomen in the hospital. A significant number of patients had died of acute
abdomen. The morbidity and mortality of acute abdomen high in rural than urban and
higher mortality ratio of acute abdomen was observed in patients who presented late and
who had rural residency. The overall mortality rate of acute abdomen in this study was
11.8%. Early diagnosis, adequate preoperative resuscitation and proper post operative care
would help to reduce the observed mortality.
Recommendations
Improving the knowledge of mid and lower level health professionals on the diagnosis,
resuscitation and importance of early referral to higher center. Health education or health promotion
must address in the community to increasing public awareness on clinical features of acute abdomen
moreover health officials and health care providers must give special attention about patient referral
system and should be strengthened surgical services.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to acknowledge:
Haramaya University
My advisors, Tesfaye Gobena (MPHM, PhD) and H/Georges Feleke (MD, General
Surgeon
Redwan (MD), Gynecologist and MIES coordinator
Gelemso hospital Administrative and Surgical staffs
12
REFERENCES
AbdelAziem A Ali, Tajeldin M.Abdallaha and Mohammed F siddigb.2011. An audit of secondary
peritonitis at a tertiary care Anonymous. 2011. African Journal of
Reproductive Health. No.3Vol.13.
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al1990. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in
the United States.
Adesunkanmi AR. Changing pattern of acute intestinal obstruction in Tropical African
Population. East Afr. Med. J.1996Nov; 73 (11):727-31
Am J Epidemiol 132:910, 1990? Acute bowel obstruction in rural hospital, Northern Uganda. East and
Central African Journal of Surgery16 (1):65-70
Az Suel, A Ajibade. 2011. Adult large bowel obstruction: A review of clinical experience Annals of
African Medicine10 (1): 45-50
Birhanu Kotiso and Zeki Abdurrahman. 2006. Patterns of acute abdomen in adult patients in Tikur
Anbesa Ethiopia. East and Central Africa journal of surgery12 (1)
Brain H. Campbell and Moss H. Mendelson 2010.Acute surgical abdomen the basics Emergency
Medicine.
Feng x i a o s h a n , L i D e f u , C h e n S h u c h a n g . Analysis of the causes of acute surgical Abdomen
in Nazareth, Ethiopia. Abstract, IVth, annual medical conference of the Ethiopian
Medical A s s o c i a t i o n (EMA), May20-22, 1998, A.A
Flum Dr, Morris A, Koepsell T, et al: Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A
population based analysis. JAMA 286:1748, 2001. (Pub Med: 11594900)
G. Ntakiyiruta and B. Mukarugwiro.Jully-Augest, 2009 .The patterns of intestinal obstruction at
Kibogola hospital, a rural hospital in Rwanda East and Central African Journal of
Surgery 14(2): 103-108
Jani, P .G and Nyga, P. W. 2011.Peritoneal drains in perforated appendicitis without peritonitis: East
and Central African Journal o f Surgery 16(2): 62-71
John P. Welch.2002. Large bowel obstruction Oxford Text Book Of Surgery, 2ndedition
13
Jonathan C Samuel, Javera S Suresh, Gift Mulima.2011. Etiology clinical Presentation and outcomes
associated with peritonitis in Lilongwe, Malawi 6: 37 doi: 10.1186/ World
Journal of Emergency Surgery 1749-7922-6-37
Julian Britton. 2002. The acute abdomen Oxford Textbook of Surgery, 2ndedition
Kaisal G Siddiqui, Arshad H Abro, Ahmed H Agha. 2012. An audit of secondary peritonitis at a tertiary
care University Hospital Of Sindh, Pakistan
Kucuk HF, Censur Z, Kurt N. 2005. The effect of Ramadan fasting on duodenal ulcer perforation:
Indian Journal of Surgery 67(4):195-198
Laal, Marjan; Mardanloo, Armita Jul1, 2009: Acute abdomen; pre and post-laparotomy diagnosis.
(International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine &
Public Health IJCRIMPH) . July 1, 2009
LiEnchen, Timothy G. Buchman. 2008. Acute abdominal pain and appendicitis.
Mark A. Malangoni and Tazoinui. 2006. Peritonitis the western experience1: 25doi: 10. 1186/ World
Journal of Emergency Surgery 1749-7922-1-25
Maurice King. 1990. Non Trauma. Primary surgery oxford volume one 2nd edition.
Mohamed Kedir Ali. 1998. Treatment of sigmoid volvulus experience in Gondar, North west Ethiopia:
Ethiopian Medical Journal36 (1)
N. A. Nasio, H. Said. March-April, 2009. Perforated ulcer disease at Kenyatta national hospital;
Nairobi, East and Central African Journal of Surgery1 4(1):13-17
N. Mbah, W. Ek.Opara and N. P. Agwu. 2006. Waiting time among acute abdominal emergency in
Nigeria teaching hospital: causes of delay and consequences
Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research 8(1-2): 69-73
Okeny, P. K, Hwang, T. G and Ogwang. 2011. Acute bowel obstruction in rural hospital, Northern
Uganda. East and Central African Journal of Surgery 16(1): 65-70
Okoro IO. May1987. Appendicitis in Zaire: A study of surgical epidemiology, etiology and
bacteriology, and of the leukocyte pattern in appendicitis. National
postgraduate Medical College of Nigeria FMCS part II Dissertation
P. Poovan and I. Mohamed 2001.Sigmoid volvulus management in a rural hospital in Ethiopia: Attat
Hospital, Central Ethiopia. East and Central African Journal of Surgery6 (1): 15-17
Philip L Chalky, Joseph B. Mabula, Mheta Koy. 2011. Clinical profile and outcome of surgical
Presentation and outcomes associated with peritonitis in Lilongwe, Malawi
6: 37doi: 10.1186/ World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1749-7922-6-37
Roberto Cirocchi, Eriberto Farinella, Francesco Lamwa.2010. World Journal of Emergency Surgery
1749-7922-5-1
14
Robin Smithuis and Adriaan Van Breda Vriesman.2005. . Acute abdomen - a practical approach. The
Radiology Assistant. Radiology department of the Rijnland Hospital,
Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
Sentayehu Tsegaye, M. Osman, A. Bekele, 2007. Surgically treated acute abdomen at Gondar
University Hospital, Ethiopia. East and Central Africa Journal of Surgery12 (1)
Shaida P Afridi, Faiza Malik, Shatiqui Rahman.2008. Spectrum of peritonitis in Pakistan
3: 31doi: 10.1186/World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1749-7922-3-31
Maurice King. 1990. Non Trauma/ Oxford Tex t Book of Surgery, 2ndedition
T. R. Okello, Ogwang P. Kissa, P. Komagum2009. Jully-Augest, Sigmoid volvulus and ileo sigmoid
knotting at St. Mary’s hospital lacorin Gullu, Uganda: East and Central
African Journal of Surgery 14(2):58-64
Sentayehu Tsegaye, M. Osman, A. Bekele. April, 2007. Surgically treated acute abdomen at Gondar
University Hospital, Ethiopia. East and Central Africa Journal of Surgery 12(1)
T. R. Okello, Ogwang P. Kissa, P. Komagum. Jully-Augest, 2009 sigmoid volvulus and ileo sigmoid
knotting at St. Mary’s hospital lacor in Gullu, Uganda
East and Central African Journal of Surgery 14(2): 58-64
Zelalem Asefa. 2001. Patterns of acute abdomen in Yirgalem hospital, Southern Ethiopia
Ethiopian Medical Journal 39(1), January, 2001.
15
Top Related