8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
1/263
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
2/263
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
3/263
November 2011
VietnamUrbanizationReviewechnical Assistance Report
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
4/263
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
5/263
iiiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWAcknowledgements
AcknowledgementsTe World Banks Vietnam Urbanization Review was led by Dean Cira, and prepared by acore team consisting o Arish Dastur, Henry Jewell, Austin Kilroy, Nancy Lozano, HuyenTi Phuong Phan, and Hyoung Gun Wang. Te team benefted rom the strategic guidance
provided by Stephen Karam and Somik Lall.
Songsu Choi, Shomik Raj Mehndiratta and aimur Samad were the peer reviewers o thereport, and the team also received inputs and suggestions rom James Anderson, Andre Bald,Luis Blancas, Christian Bodewig, Alexander V. Danilenko, Moustaa Baher El-Henawy,Tomas Farole, Demilour Reyes Ignacio, Steven Jaee, Markus Kostner, Valerie Kozel, TanhTi Mai, Marilyn olosa Martinez, Daniel Mont, Dzung Te Nguyen, Nga Nguyet Nguyen,Hoa Ti Mong Pham, Duc Minh Pham, Martin Rama, Van Anh Ti ran, Paul Vallely, VictorVergara and Choong Yeol Ye. Te report was edited by Chris Rodrigo.
Giang Ti Huong Nguyen and Hien Minh Vu provided excellent logistical support to theteam.
World Bank management provided valuable guidance throughout the process, and the teamis particularly thankul or the support provided by, Victoria Kwakwa, John Roome, JennierSara, Vijay Jagannathan and Victor Vergara in the East Asia and Pacifc Region and to ZoubidaAllaoua and Abha Joshi-Ghani rom the Banks Finance, Economics and Urban DevelopmentUnit.
Te consultants and frms that helped prepare background reports or this work are AlainBertaud, Etude Economique Conseil, Quang Minh Consulting, Mekong Economics, andUrban Solutions.
Te World Bank is grateul to the ollowing development partners or so generously sharingtheir inormation with the team: ADB, AFD, DFID, GIZ, JICA, KW, UNDP and UN
Habitat.Te Vietnam Urban Review has been inormed and enriched through extensive and valuablediscussions with the Government o Vietnam. Te World Bank team would like to thankMinistry o Planning and Investment, Ministry o Finance, Ministry o Construction,Ministry o Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry o ransport, Vietnam Institute oArchitecture, Urban and Rural Planning, Vietnam Academy o Social Sciences, as well as the
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
6/263
iv VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWAcknowledgements
Provincial Governments (and the Departments, Universities and Institutes) o Ho Chi MinchCity, Hanoi and Da Nang or their support in making this report possible.
Te Vietnam Urban Review was supported by generous co-unding rom the Cities Alliance.
WORLD BANK
Disclaimer
Te views expressed in this publication are those o the
authors and not necessarily those o the Cities Alliance
Disclaimer
Tis volume is a product o the sta o the World
Bank. Te fndings, interpretations and conclusionsexpressed herein do not necessarily reect the views othe Board o Executive Directors o the World Bank orthe governments they represent.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
7/263
vVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWable o Contents
Executive Summary XV
Chapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System 1
Chapter 2: Connecting Vietnams Urban Portolio 69
Chapter 3: Urban Expansion and Spatial Development in 113Vietnams Cities
Chapter 4: Access to Basic Services 189
Chapter 5: Policy Considerations and Options or Further 223Analysis
able o Contents
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
8/263
vi VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
ables, Boxes and FiguresABLESable 1.1: Government Policies to Control and Guide Urban Development in Vietnam 4
able 1.2: Changing Economic Structure in Vietnam 7
able 1.3: Proportion o Urban Population and Economic Power by City Class (2009) 11able 1.4: Change in Urban Classifcation 1999-2009 12
able 1.5: Distribution o Cities across Classes and Regions 2009 14
able 1.6: Average City Size in 2009 and Between 1999-2009, by Region 16
able 1.7: Average City Size in 2009 and City Growth (1999-2009), By City Class 16
able 1.8: Average City Size in 2009 and City Growth (1999-2009) by Region 17and City Class
able 1.9: City Population Statistics in 2009 and Changes (1999-2009) rom Regions 22
able1.10: City Population Statistics in 2009 and Changes (1999-2009) by City Class 23able 1.11: Employment Structure, by Region and Activity 26
able 1.12: Employment Structure, by City Class 27
able 1.13: Employment Structure, by Distance Quintiles rom Hanoi 28
able 1.14: Employment Structure, by Distance Quintiles rom HCMC 29
able 1.15: Rising Manuacturing Sophistication in Vietnam (1999-2009) 35
able 1.16: Manuacturing Specialization by Region 38
able 1.17: Manuacturing Specialization by City Class 39able 1.18: Manuacturing Specialization by Distance rom Hanoi 40
able 1.19: Manuacturing Specialization by Distance rom HCMC 41
able 1.20: Regional Character o Manuacturing (2009) 44
able 1.21: Number o Industrial Zones by Province 49
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
9/263
viiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
able 1.22: Average Income (GDP per capita in millions o VND) by Region 50
able 1.23: Average Income (GDP per capita in million o NVD) by City Class 52
able 1.24: Educational Attainment by Region and City Class 53
able 1.25: Poverty Incidence by Region 53
able 1.26: Poverty Incidence by City Class 54
able 1.27: Poverty Distribution (national share) by Region 56
able 1.28: Poverty Distribution (national share) by City Class 56
able 1.29: Housing Conditions and Basic Service Provision by Region 57
able 1.30: Housing Conditions and Basic Service Provision by City Class 58
able 2.1: Modal Share by Commodity, 2008 (ton/day) 73
able 2.2: Freight ransportation Volume (ton/day) by rip Distance, 2008 75
able 2.3: A Projection o Modal Shares o Freight ransportation, 2008-2030 78
able 2.4: ransport Inrastructure Investments, 1999-2007 79
able 2.5: Road Improvements in Vietnam, 1999-2007 80
able 2.6: Specifcs o World Bank-EEC Survey Data Points 81
able 2.7: Te rucking Survey Sample Structure 83
able 2.8: Freight Movements by City Class and by Region 84
able 2.9: Main Obstacles to Inter-City rucking Operations by City Class, Region 87and Freight Movements
able 2.10: Haulage Characteristics by City Class, Region and Freight Movements 88
able 2.11: ransport Price and Cost Structure by City Class, Region and Freight 92
Movements
able 2.12: Correlation Coecient Matrix o Key Indicators o Inter-City ransportation 93
able 2.13: Unit Freight ransport Price (per ton-km) by ransportation Mode in 95Comparator Countries
able 2.14: Haulage Characteristics, by City Class and rip Distance 100
able 2.15: ransport Price and Cost Structure, by City Class and rip Distance 101
able 2.16: Factors Determining rucking Prices o Inter-City Freight Movements 103
able 2.17: South Koreas ransportation Policies at Dierent Stages o Urbanization 107
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
10/263
viii VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
able 3.1: Expansion o Housing acilities in Vietnam 125
able 3.2: Hanoi ransportation Modal Split (2008) 134
able 3.3: Forecast GDP, Car Ownership, rac Composition, Road Capacity and 145Vehicles Speeds in Da Nang
able 3.4: Land Use Parameters and ransit Features in HCMC, Seoul and Singapore 150
able 3.5: Actual Land Use Patterns in Hanoi 152
able 3.6: Payment Structure in Vietnams Residential Housing Markets 159
able 3.7: World Ranking o Regulations on Construction Permits and Property 160Registrations
able 3.8: Recent Improvements in Land Use Right Certifcate System in Vietnam 165able 3.9: Possession o Red Book Land Use Right Certifcate 165
able 3.10: ime Needed or Land Use Right Approval in Five Selected Cities 167
able 3.11: Land Use Changes in Residential Land 168
able 3.12: Land Use Changes o Residential Land in Urban Fringe 169
able 3.13: Industrial Zones in Six Selected Provinces 173
able 3.14: Spatially Fragmented Planning 178
able 4.1: ax Revenues and ransers 2010 201able 4.2: Revenue rom Land or Major City-Centered Provinces 205
able 4.3: Electricity Expenditures as Percentage o otal Household Cash Expenditures 209
able 4.4: Electricity Rates in Vietnam Comparison with Other Countries 210
BOXESBox 1.1: Socioeconomic Development Strategy or the Period 2011-2020 7
Box 1.2: Criteria to be Considered Urban 12
Box 1.3: Urbanization Patterns in South Korea 19
Box 1.4: Decentralization in Vietnam 20
Box 1.5: Te Evolving Role o HCMC and Vietnams Economic Gateway 32
Box 1.6: South Koreas Experience with Spatial Evolution o Manuacturing Activities 33
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
11/263
ixVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
Box 1.7: Industrial Specialization across City Size (India, China, Brazil and US) 36
Box 1.8: Indias Industrial Specialization, by Manuacturing technology and Distance 47
rom Seven Largest CitiesBox 1.9: Special Economic Zones in Vietnam 47
Box 1.10: South Koreas Experience in Urbanization Process 61
Box 2.1: ransport Inrastructure by Sector 71
Box 2.2: Freight ransport Cost Structure by Mode and by Distance (India) 76
Box 2.3: Indias ransport Costs or Inter-City rucking Movements in 2010 94
Box 2.4: Regulatory Reorms in Road Freight (OECD Countries, Mexico and South 105Korea)
Box 3.1: Neighborhood Upgrading in HCMC 124
Box 3.2: ransmilenio in Bogot, Colombia 142
Box 3.3: Vietnams wo-iered Land Price System 153
Box 3.4: Sources or Market Prices in Real Estate in Vietnam 156
Box 3.5: Te Challenges o New owns 174
Box 3.6: Experiences o Land Pooling and Land Readjustment 175
Box 3.7: Te Philippines Attempts and Regionalization 179
Box 4.1: How Vietnam Achieved High Rates o Electrifcation 193
Box 4.2: Water Utilities Data 195
Box 4.3: Decentralization o Public Investment 201
Box 4.4: Governance Challenges in the Electricity Sector 217
Box 4.5: Lessons rom Water Utility Reorm in Cambodia 216
Box 4.6: A Brie Note on Education in Vietnam 216
Box 4.7: Municipal Development Funds as an Alternative Source o Financing or 218
Basic Services
FIGURESFigure 1.1: Vietnams Urbanization and Economic Growth 6
Figure 1.2: Analytical Framework: Five ransitions (or shis) 8
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
12/263
x VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
Figure 1.3: Vietnams Regional and Urban Administrative Hierarchy 10
Figure 1.4: Te Rank-size Distribution o Vietnamese Cites 15
Figure 1.5: Spatial Profles o Urban Population Changes between 1999-2009 18
Figure 1.6: Expansion o City Boundaries between 1999-2009 24
Figure 1.7: Population Density in 2009 and Urban Land Changes (1999-2009) 25
Figure 1.8: Location Quotient per Sector 30
Figure 1.9: Location Quotient o Manuacturing Subsectors 42
Figure 1.10: Manuacturing Specialization (location quotient) Distance rom Hanoi vs. 45HCMC
Figure 1.11: Average Income Profle in 2009 51Figure 1.12: Changes in Poverty Incidence between 1999-2009 55
Figure 1.13: Profle o Public Service Provision in 2009 59
Figure 2.1: Modal Share o Other Countries (%, ton) 74
Figure 2.2: Distribution o Inter-Provincial Freight Movements, Projected 2008 77
Figure 2.3: Location o Origin o Cities in the rucking Survey 82
Figure 2.4: Inter-City Freight Networks in a Broader Context 85
Figure 2.5: Main Obstacles to Inter-City rucking Operations 86Figure 2.6: ransport Price and Yearly Mileage by City Class, Region and Freight 91
Movement
Figure 2.7: International Comparison o Unit Freight ransport Price per ton-km, by 95Roads
Figure 2.8: Factors Causing Idle ime during rips, by City Class, Region and Freight 96Movement ype
Figure 2.9: ransport Price and Yearly Mileage, by City Class and rip Distance 99
Figure 2.10: Unit rucking Price per ton-km by a rucks Mileage, One rip Distance 102and ruck Size
Figure 3.1: Household Incomes Distribution in Hanoi and HCMC 115
Figure 3.2: Housing ypology and Household Income in HCMC 116
Figure 3.3: Process o Subdivision in Da Nang 117
Figure 3.4: Urbanization Process along Hoang Van Tai Road 2002-2010 118
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
13/263
xiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
Figure 3.5: Estimated Distribution o Housing Processes per Sq. Meter in Da Nang 119
Figure 3.6: Example o ube House Pattern in Hanoi 120
Figure 3.7: Comparative Population Densities in Built-up Areas o Hanoi 121
Figure 3.8: Number o Housing Units Launched per Year in Hanoi 122
Figure 3.9: Number o Registered Vehicles in Vietnam, 1997-2009 128
Figure 3.10: Higher Incomes Lead to Increased Vehicle Ownership 128
Figure 3.11: Number and Severity o rac Accidents in Vietnam 1992-2009 129
Figure 3.12: Road Space required by 50 People (cars, Motorcycles, bus) 130
Figure 3.13: Map o Hanoi Built-up Densities, 2009 131
Figure 3.14: Population Density Gradients in Hanoi and Selected Cities 132
Figure 3.15: Comparison o Road Density in Hanoi, Bangkok, New York and Seoul 133
Figure 3.16: Street Area per Person at Various Residential Densities across the World 134
Figure 3.17: Relationship between Density and Road Areas in Neighborhoods 135o Selected Cities
Figure 3.18: Catchment Areas o 25 Stations o Hanois Projected Mass ransit System 136
Figure 3.19: Comparison o Radial (Singapore) and Grid (Seoul) Mass ransit Systems 137
Figure 3.20: Actual Land Use Patterns in Da Nang 139Figure 3.21: Real Population Densities in Da Nangs built up Areas 140
Figure 3.22: Population Density Gradient in Da Nang 141
Figure 3.23: Estimated Distribution o Housing Prices in Da Nang 141
Figure 3.24: Projected BR Routes in Da Nang 144
Figure 3.25: Population Densities in HCMC 146
Figure 3.26: Profle o Built Up Densities in HCMC 147
Figure 3.27: Te Planned ransit System o HCMC 148Figure 3.28: Te ransit System o HCMC Compared with Seoul and Singapore 149
Figure 3.29: Actual Land Use Patterns in Hanoi 152
Figure 3.30: Monthly Apartment Rents in Vietnam (2008-09) 155
Figure 3.31: Advertised Monthly Residential Rents in Hanoi (Feb. 2011) 157
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
14/263
xii VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWables, Boxes and Figures
Figure 3.32: Advertised Monthly Residential Rents in HCMC (Feb. 2011) 157
Figure 3.33: Vacant Land Prices in Hanoi (2011) 158
Figure 3.34: Vacant Land Prices in HCMC (2011) 158
Figure 3.35: Vietnam Slips Down the Rankings i De Factor Measure are used 162
Figure 3.36: Access to Land and Security o enure between Provinces 163
Figure 3.37: Responses to Access to Land Viewed as Problem or Business Operations 164
Figure 3.38: Access to Land Relative to Inormal Practices and Workorce Education 170
Figure 3.39: Hanoi Capital Construction Master Plan to 2030 172
Figure 4.1: Reducing Disparity o Access to Basic Services South Koreas Case 191
Figure 4.2: Access to Electricity in Vietnam over the Past Fieen Years 192
Figure 4.3: Urban and Rural and Regional Electricity Access Rates 193
Figure 4.4: Urbanization and Water Supply Coverage 195
Figure 4.5: Convergence o Living Standards Colombia and Vietnam 196
Figure 4.6: Water Supply Reliability by City Size 197
Figure 4.7: Access to Sanitation in Urban and Rural Areas (1999 and 2009) 198
Figure 4.8: Access to Sanitation by City Class 199
Figure 4.9: Four Levels o Government in Vietnam 200
Figure 4.10: Water aris Compared to O&M and Debt Service by City Class 210
Figure 4.11: Average Water ari Aordability 213
Figure 4.12: Unaccounted or Water by City Class 214
Figure 4.13: Sta per Connection or Water Utilities by City Class 215
Figure 4.14: Pipe Breaks per Year by City Class 215
Figure 4.15 Net enrollment rates by general education level across regions (2008) 217
Figure 4.16 Ratio o state budgets contributed to education: 2000-2008 218
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
15/263
xiiiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWSelected Abbreviations and Acronyms
Selected Abbreviations andAcronyms
ADB Asian Development Bank
AFD Agence Francaise de Developpement
CBD Central Business DistrictDFID Department or International Development (United Kingdom)
DSI Development Strategy Institute
EZ Economic Zones
FAR Floor Area Ratio
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GIS Geographic Inormation Systems
GIZ Gesellescha ur Internationale ZusammenarbeitGSO Government Statistics Oce
HCMC Ho Chi Minh City
HCCMP Hanoi Capital Construction Master Plan
HZ High echnology Zones
IBNE International Benchmarking Network o Water and Sanitation Utilities
IC Industrial Clusters
IZ Industrial and Processing ZonesJICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
KW Kredistalt ur Wiederaubrau
L Location Quotient
LURC Land Use Registration Certifcate
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
16/263
xiv VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWSelected Abbreviations and Acronyms
MOC Ministry o Construction
MONRE Ministry o Natural Resources and Environment
MO Ministry o ransport
MPI Ministry o Planning and Investment
MRD Mekong River Delta
NH-1 National Highway No. 1
O-D Origin and Destination
O&M Operations and Maintenance
SDS ransport Sector Development Strategy
UNDP United Nations Development Program
UFW Unaccounted or Water
VDR Vietnam Development Report
VIRANSS-2 Comprehensive Study on Sustainable Development o the ransport Systemin Vietnam
VND Vietnam Dong (Currency)
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
17/263
xvVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
Executive SummaryVietnam will have only one chance to get urbanization right. I we ail at urbanization, wewill ail at industrialization and modernization. -- Deputy Prime Minister Nguyen SinhHung, speaking at the Vietnam National Urban Conerence, November 6th-7th, 2009.
IntroductionAs Vietnam enters a crucial period o urbanization corresponding to its present stage o economicdevelopment, the Government o Vietnam has placed strong emphasis on developing its systemo cities. Tis commitment is explicitly stated in the above statement by Deputy Prime MinisterNguyen Sinh Hung. In accordance with this objective this Urbanization Review is dedicatedto understanding the key dimensions and aspects o Vietnams urbanization process and toidentiying trends, opportunities, challenges and core policy priorities that the government
will need to address in order to realize its objective.
Te Vietnam Urbanization Review was prepared ollowing extensive consultations with various
stakeholders, including ocials rom national and local government, private sector groups andinternational and bilateral organizations active in development assistance in the urban sectorin Vietnam. It builds on a strong portolio o World Bank engagements in investment and
policy lending to the Government o Vietnam. It also builds on a number o more in-depthstudies that were commissioned specifcally or the Vietnam Urbanization Review. Te WorldBank is carrying out Urbanization Reviews or a number o countries, but Vietnam is one othe frst or which this comprehensive analysis is being developed.
Chapter 1 o this review analyzes how Vietnams urban system is evolving along fve transitions:administrative; demographic; economic; physical; and welare. Te shis taking place alongthese dimensions are o-course interrelated, and provide a good point o departure to the
overall analysis. Te Urbanization Review then ocuses on understanding in more detail somecore areas o priority or Vietnam, building on prior analysis and the extensive consultationsthe team undertook in the preparation o this report. Tese chapters are: connecting Vietnamsurban portolio (Chapter 2); urban expansion and spatial development in Vietnams cities(Chapter 3); and basic urban services (Chapter 4). Tese are reerred to as the core diagnostics.It is hoped, that this work will provide a uller understanding o the basic elements o Vietnamsurbanization process, shed some light on the challenges it is acing and identiy areas or urther
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
18/263
xvi VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
analysis that will aid policy makers in addressing these challenges. Some areas or urtherconsideration and inquiry are presented in the fnal chapter o the Review (Chapter 5).
Principal Messages o the Vietnam Urbanization Review
Vietnams Evolving Urban SystemChapter 1 considers how Vietnams urban system is evolving. Tis analysis is done byconsidering fve transitions across the entire urban system. Te fve transitions or shisconsist o administrative, physical, economic, demographic, and welare changes across theentire Vietnam urban system. Te frst one, the administrative transition, reers to how theoverarching policies, institutional and management practices central to urbanization (as well
as issues like the decentralization agenda), critically inuence the other our transitions. One oits components, the classifcation o cities, constitutes a major area o ocus in this chapter. Tephysical transition, examines urbanization in a spatial dimension, and ocuses on changesto land use as urbanization takes place. Te economic transition examines the nature andtransormations o economic activity driving urbanization and is oen a driver o the othertransitions. Te demographic transition describes the socioeconomic changes brought aboutby Vietnams economic and spatial transormation (and vice versa). Te welare transitioncorrelated with the economic changes as well as the physical, administrative and demographicchangeswould indicate whether Vietnams urbanization trajectory has improved the well-being o its population, particularly the most vulnerable populations.
Understanding these transitions is important or developing the right policies that will allowVietnam to maximize the benefts rom its ongoing urban transormation.
Since the 1986 Doi Moi reorms, Vietnams urban population has begun to grow. Te reviewindicates that Vietnam is in an incipient stage o urbanization transitioning to an intermediatestage with rapid urbanization (currently 30% urban with 3.4% urban population growth per
year) with an increasing economic transition toward industrial manuacturing as a share oboth employment and economic output. Population growth in the past ten years has beenastest in Vietnams largest cities o Hanoi and HCMC, their surrounding regions and in somemedium sized cities. With ew exceptions, small cities grew the least or lost population.
Vietnam has developed two independent and dominant core-periphery urban systems:Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. Vietnams rapid economic growth is driven by these twourban systems with high growth and industrial concentration within these cities and theirsurrounding areas. Te fnding that economic growth is led by a single or a ew core economicnodes is consistent with the experience o other rapidly developing countries in incipient orintermediate stages o urbanization.While growth is concentrated in these two core urbansystems, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City maniest dierent economic growth trajectories
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
19/263
xviiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
driven by dierent conditions o economic geography.
Ho Chi Minh City and the Southeast region host nearly hal (45%) o overall manuacturingproduction. Heavy and ast growing (higher tech) manuacturing activity is more intense in theHanoi and the Red River Delta Region than in HCMC and the Southeast Region (55% and39%, respectively). Industrialization is rapidly progressing in Hanoi and the Red River Deltaregion due to its proximity to the massive industrial bases in South China. But it appears thatHCMC and the Southeast Region show some signs o saturation in production o low value-added products. Despite that, the rapidly expanding container handling capacity in the deep-
water port near HCMC is creating an installed capacity that will be larger than Singaporesentire current throughput by 2015. Already, or the frst time in the countrys history, this portis connecting Vietnam with Western Europe and North America via direct ocean services.Tese dierences in economic and strategic profles have important implications or policy
makers.While economic development is concentrated in the two core metropolitan regions o HCMCand Hanoi, as is to be expected, welare improvements have been more widespread. Overall,there appears to be strong convergence o welare across provinces; this steady distributiono welare improvement is mainly driven by sustained and strong government commitmentto inclusive social development. It is underpinned economically by the strong growtho core metropolitan cities and ensuing positive spillover to the hinterlands. But theseimprovements must be interpreted with caution. Tere remain disparities in access to andquality o services provided; urther there are areas o persistent poverty in Vietnam. Vietnam,like many countries is moving rom incipient to intermediate stages o urbanization and romlower to middle income levels: it needs thereore to consider not only access, but quality andreliability o basic services.
Connecting Vietnams Urban PortolioChapter 2 considers the connectivity o the urban portolio. Rooted in a broader understandingo agglomeration economies and economic geography theory, this chapter primarily ocuses onconnective inrastructure as it relates to reight movement in Vietnams urban system.
Te chapter begins by looking at the modal split o reight transportation across the country. Itreveals that the two dominant modes o reight transport are inland waterways with 48%, and
roads with 45%. Te bulk o manuactured goods (88%) are transported by roads, while mostheavy raw materials, such as construction materials (73%) and coal (79%), are shipped usinginland waterways.
Rail reight is relatively weak at 1.9% and coastal reight which is the dominant mode orlonger trips (over 1000 km, particularly 1400km-1600km) is responsible or 4.4% o reightmovement. Te dominance o short distance reight transportation trips o less than 200km
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
20/263
xviii VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
distance is quite signifcant: 87% o all reight movement takes place within 200km, with 98%o all inland waterway movement taking place within 200km and 73% o road movement
within 100km. Tis can be partly explained by the act that 60% o the reight movement othe economic centers is intra-regional.
Inter-city reight movements confrm the dominance o the two urban systems o HoChi Minh City and Hanoi. However, these two regions are limiting their competitiveadvantage on account o logistics bottlenecks and disproportionately high transport costs.Improving urban road and inrastructure conditions would be priorities in HCMC, Hanoiand their economic regions. Clearly investments in spatially connective logistic inrastructureare needed to sustain these engines o economic growth. But improving inrastructure is notsucient. As is detailed in Chapter 2, reorms to reduce inormal payments and corruptionin the sector are needed to reduce costs, especially in the southeast, and urther reorms in the
trucking industry must also be made to improve eciency. Freight transport costs in HCMCand Hanoi regions can be reduced by 57% and 67%, respectively, i their unit costs are reducedto levels o Class 1 cities.
Urban Expansion and Spatial Development in Vietnams CitiesChapter 3 examines the processes o urban expansion and spatial development in Vietnamesecities. It starts out by looking at housing, ollowed by an examination o urban orm andmobility in the cities o Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh and Da Nang. While Vietnam has done wellon some o the issues, there are some important elements that need to be addressed to ensurethat achievements can be sustained by Vietnamese cities as they move on to the next stage o
challenges with higher levels o urbanization. Te chapter then looks into land and real estatemarkets and the urban planning process. Land markets and urban planning are critical actorsin helping urban economies to unction eciently and equitably, and the chapter providessome initial suggestions or strengthening the approaches currently prevalent in Vietnam.
By and large Vietnamese cities have managed to enable a pluralistic supply o housingto meet the needs o dierent segments. It seems that much o the demand or housing inVietnam, especially or low income groups, is and will be met in the ollowing ways.
1) Small contractors constructing traditional townhouses where land is available within the
city or in its immediate periphery,2) Government acilitated densifcation through the extension o the road network to
integrate ormer villages close to the city.
3) Te incremental upgrading and maintenance o the existing housing stock by individuals(including the increase in FAR by vertical extension), and the upgrading o inrastructureand services by the Government.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
21/263
xixVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
As a lower-income and rapidly urbanizing country, Vietnam has very ew urban slums. Someo the reasons or this are discussed in Chapter 3. Tis outcome is particularly striking when
compared with cities in countries which have even higher incomes such as India, the Philippines,Indonesia, and Brazil to mention a ew.
Vietnams cities still enjoy relatively good urban mobility, due in large part to the ollowingeatures.
1) Te nearly universal use o the motorcycles as the primary means o transportation;
2) Te characteristic mixed land use neighborhoods o Vietnamese cities (which result in theclose proximity o many o the day-to-day trips individuals typically make).
3) Te prevalence o shop-houses, where many people live in the space above or behind theirstores.
Te above picture is changing rapidly with the increase in the usage o cars in cities. Telogistical inrastructure o the largest cities o Hanoi and HCMC are not capable o sustainingextended use o motor-cars as the major means o transportation; indeed, increased car use
would eventually lead to gridlock. With car ownership on the rise, and the benefts o plannedtransit systems 10-15 years away, a major challenge will be to slow down the transition toautomobiles.
While there are plans or public transport systems in most major cities, a nearly universalpreerence or personal transport will run counter to plans or such urban transit systems.Tis is why public transport options should be designed as a part o a system that together withmotorcycle trips will compete in overall cost and convenience to the car. In addition, plannedtransit systems will have to take into account market driven and evolving land use patterns incities. Te increasingly polycentric layout o the countrys large cities o Hanoi and HCMCmight require the public transit options to be designed as a grid-like mass transit network oa longer total length than radial routes alone, and/or that they should include investments ineeder routes.
Land markets in Vietnam reect some o the deeper issues with land management and
governance. For instance the huge discrepancies between the Governments set price or landand the market price (which is oen 10 times higher than the set price) - is a cause or largedistortions and bottlenecks in the land market. Tis two-price system can transer huge valuesand benefts to developers (oen SOEs), investors and speculators. Also, since land allocations,
joint venture deals, taxes, concessions and permissions or developers and investors are basedon artifcially deated land values the Government is signifcantly oreiting the creation o
public beneft by undervaluing one o its most valuable assets. Also, as the amount o land tiedup in conict rises, a supply bottleneck is created which urther increases the market price or
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
22/263
xx VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
land and housing a urther distortion in the market. Further, the artifcially lower priced landstimulates a prolieration o land sales that contributes to rapid urban sprawl and the high
inrastructure ineciencies and capital costs associated with it.An initial review o real estate prices in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City suggest that pricesare rather high when compared with comparator cities in Asia. At the urban ringe, vacantland prices are roughly $500/m2 and above in both cities, but closer to the center, vacant land
prices are ar higher in Hanoi than in HCMC: as much as $7,000/m2 or $8,000/m2 in Hanoi,but more like $4,000/m2 in HCMC. An interesting fnding is that vacant land exhibits pricesthat approach almost 1,000 times the monthly rent or housing at the same location. In other
words, vacant land is priced at around 80 years worth o monthly rent. Tis is an unusually largedierence, and suggests that vacant land prices reect a strong expectation o increased rents orresale values in the uture, in order to pay o such high initial investmentsand perhaps also a
lack o other options or storing wealth. At the same time strong government rental subsidiesto a segment o the rental market probably brings down the average o the rental price. Tesenumbers suggest that perhaps only 5% o the population in Hanoi can aord to buy propertiesat these inated prices.
Land and real estate market regulations appear to be improving but there are still moreessential improvements to be made. Enterprise Survey data rom two large surveys oVietnamese frms conducted in 2005 and in 2009 indicates a substantial improvement infrms rating o their ability to access land. Access to land remains rather more problematicin the Red River Delta than elsewhere, but overall has improved dramatically in all regions oVietnam. It is a Severe Obstacle to doing business or ar ewer frms in 2009 than it was in
2005, and though it remains a Major Obstacle or a substantial proportion o frms, the trendis defnitely one o improvement.
Te urban planning system in Vietnam has two undamental areas where it can bestrengthened. Te frst is that the prevalent master planning approach in Vietnam is notevidence based and can be signifcantly strengthened to more accurately respond to thedimensions and locations o demand and o market orces. Te second is that like in many othercountries, the planning system is ragmented and silo based, without adequate integration andcoordination across either unctional or spatial jurisdictions. Tese are both very importantareas to address especially as the eciency o the urban orm and the benefts o long-termeconomic agglomeration will strongly depend on the extent to which these defciencies in theurban planning system can be addressed.
Tere are signs that provinces are now moving toward the riskier and more expensiveapproach o new towns, and to high-end and iconic real estate projects that are not basedon an integrated urban strategy that actors in market demand and long-term costs andbenefts. Since land sales oen comprises one o the largest sources o revenue or provinces,and since increase in administrative boundaries and urban land push a city higher up in the
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
23/263
xxiVIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
Governments urban hierarchy there is an incentive to sell land and expand outward (evenwhen there is no clear demand). Tis phenomenon is likely to be an important reason in
explaining Vietnams ast expansion o cities outwards.Basic Urban ServicesChapter 4 provides a general view o the state o access to basic services in Vietnam, and looksinto issues o service quality as well. It also looks into aspects o how basic service provision isfnanced in Vietnam.
Vietnam has achieved about 96% access to electrical power supply, an achievement that ishighly commendable or a developing country; however access to other basics services suchas water and sanitation still remain at lower levels. While Vietnam has also done a remarkable
job increasing access to water in urban areas in the last ten years, access is still not universal;Data rom 65 utility companies show that only 12 percent o households in the area coveredby the companies had access to the water network in 2002. By 2007 more than 70 percent othe population in the area was connected. However, there is still much to be done in extendingaccess to water throughout the nation. Tere have been strong improvements in sanitationaccess as well over the years. From low levels around 17 percent in 1999, more than 67 percento households in urban areas had access to a toilet in 2009. While rising rom a very low 13
percent, rural areas still lag typical urban access levels, with only 48 percent o householdshaving a toilet.As Vietnam moves to higher income levels and universal access is achieved inother services as has been done with electricity, the next goal should be to ocus on qualityo services.
Vietnam has achieved high primary education enrolments in both its urban and ruralregions (almost 90%) which can be attributed to the governments policy o mandatoryuniversal primary education. Enrolment rates or lower secondary education are almost 80%;this tapers down to about 56% or upper secondary education, where the divergence betweenrural and urban educational attainment becomes more pronounced. However, it must be keptin mind that national averages do not reveal dierences between the rich and the poor, acrossregions, and relating to ethnic minorities groups. In general and as might be expected, the moreurban a province is (the higher the share o its population that is urban), the higher studentattainment. Completion rates in rural areas are about two-thirds o those in urban areas. Teocus going orward will need to be on reducing the education attainment gap between dierentgroups, on strengthening higher education, as well as on improving the quality o education.
Provinces and their subsidiary units are fnancing themselves through a range o sources:equalization transers rom the central government, taxes, land sales, short-term debt, localdevelopment investment unds, and sometimes through cross-subsidy rom proftable subsidiaryentities o provincial public utility companies. Te merits and risks o these approaches need tobe urther examined, as alternatives are considered. For the poorer provinces, the equalization
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
24/263
xxii VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWExecutive Summary
ormula has been a cornerstone in enabling access to basic services, and should be maintained.At the same time, there is room or improvement in strengthening and deepening the ability o
provinces to leverage other sustainable sources o fnancing. Some options or achieving moreuniversal access to urban services might be to: (i) ramp up cost recovery which will lead tobetter services; (ii) increase the eciency and the quality o service provision to meet growingdemand and reduce costs; and (iii) reduce the dependence on public investment and to fndother, sustainable sources o fnancing, including private sources (where benefcial), to improveaccess and quality o service.
Policy Considerations and Options or Further AnalysisTe intent o the Urbanization Review is not to articulate a set o policy priorities per se, butto highlight relevant policy areas and choices that emerge rom the detailed analysis. Tese
are summarized in Chapter 5. In addition, Chapter 5 suggests some specifc areas where theWorld Bank can potentially provide continued analytical and advisory services and collaboratewith the Government together with other development partners in helping to advanceunderstanding o policy options and challenges in these key areas.
Te fnal Chapter o the Urbanization Review thereore outlines a possible program o analyticaland advisory services that the Bank can provide. Some o this would include new analytical
work, while other aspects are already planned or can be incorporated into World Bank lendingoperations. Moving this policy dialogue orward will require developing opportunities or
policy dialogue channels with government, such as the Urban Forum which is in a process obeing revitalized by the Government. It would also be important to strengthen collaboration
with other development partners who are working with the Government o Vietnam on theseissues.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
25/263
VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWMC LC 1
1VietnamsEvolving
Urban System
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
26/263
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
27/263
3VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
1.1 Vietnams urbanization in a system o citiesVietnam will have only one chance to get urbanization right. I we ail at urbanization, we will ail
at industrialization and modernization. -- Deputy Prime Minister Nguyen Sinh Hung, speakingat the Vietnam National Urban Conerence, November 6th-7th, 2009.
1.1.1 Te socio-economic background to urbanizationBeore independence industrial development in Vietnam took place in three independentcolonial regions centered on Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) and Hue, the old imperialcapital. While the centrally located Hue still continues to be an important historic and culturaldestination, as well as a provincial capital it is Hanoi in the north and Ho Chi Minh Cityin the south that now anchor much o Vietnams urban economy. Te economic geography
that has been developing in Vietnam over the last hal-century or more thereore has a longerhistory, deriving also rom the act that the elongated shape o the country naturally neededmore than one principal economic pole.
Interestingly, these two poles have more recently also developed along slightly dierenttrajectories, partially because o the inheritance o contradictory governing and socioeconomicsystems or more than twenty years. Te South employed liberal market policies (as SouthVietnam) while the North ollowed a socialist model (North Vietnam). In the eleven yearsollowing re-unifcation, the unifed country ollowed the socialist development model
placing greater emphasis on rural areas and on building a planned economy that entailed thedistribution and concentration o industry in select centers. It was only since the adoption o
the sweeping Doi Moi policies in 1986 that the government began to introduce liberal marketmechanisms, encouraging private-sector initiatives, while retaining its role as the nationsstrategic planner and enorcer.
Although Vietnam has embarked on a trajectory o rapid economic liberalization with theinception o Doi Moi, its government has also implemented a variety o policies in an attemptto oster a more even distribution o economic growth and urban development. For example,Government Decision No. 10 (1998) on the Urban System and Development Strategy to 2020called or the development o medium and small sized cities while containing the growth o thelargest cities. Subsequently the Government accepted the possibility o the rise o mega-cities
with populations over 10 million (Government Decision No. 445 in 2009). Te 2011-2020
Socio Economic Development Strategy de acto accepts that urbanization will be necessaryto promote the countrys goals o industrialization and modernization as is reected inthe powerul and unequivocal opening quote o this chapter. able 1.1 details a series oGovernment policies to control and guide urban development in Vietnam.
China has also made the same policy reversals, shiing urban policy emphasis rom smallcities to large cities while promoting balanced development so that national urban policies do
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
28/263
4 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
not penalize large cities but acknowledge the major contribution o large cities to economicdevelopment. Te eleventh FYP or 2006-2010 placed much stronger emphasis on the
development o metropolitan regions across the country, and the promotion o urbanizationprocess through the balanced development o cities and towns. Te change in part reectsthe governments desire to balance growth more towards domestic consumption away romexports, and the view that large cities can make a disproportionately larger contribution to thecountrys economic development.
able 1.1 Government policies to control and guide urban development in Vietnam
Urban Development Policies
Central Control oAdministrative Boundary Shis
Controlling PopulationMovements and the Demographicransition
Urban Service Provision and theWelare ransition
Urban Finance and the Economicransition
Consequences
From 1954 to the present, administrative boundary changes requiredapproval rom the central government. Tis has historically beenviewed as an eective tool or controlling city size and encroachment ourban areas onto agricultural lands. With the increase in urbanizationsince Doi Moi policies in the late 1980s, the loss o agricultural landto urban use is increasing conicts at the urban ringe o many cities.
Te demographic transition has been largely controlled by the urbanresidency permission system, which is essentially a Vietnamese versiono the Chinese hukou system. Tis was considered largely eective orits intended purpose rom 1954 to 1990. Since 1990 this policy hasbeen relaxed - the eects o which can be seen in the demographictransition since 1990; the urban population rose rom 19.5% in 1990to roughly 30% in 2009. However, remnants o this system mayactually still result in an undercount o the actual urban population
with many migrants potentially not accounted or in this number.
From 1954 to early 1990s uniorm utility rates or the provision ourban services largely discouraged the provision o these services andimpacted their quality. In most cases since the 1990s and the 2000s,reorms in service provision have been made to allow or cost recoveryin taris and an orientation to commercial practices. Tis has had ageneral positive impact on increasing access to basic services across allurban classifcations. Quality o services remains a problem.
Urban Construction fnance rom 1954 to the present has beenlargely controlled through the state and the redistribution o revenueson a per capita basis. Tis has had a positive impact on equity betweenregions and urban areas. But many cities still struggle to makeinrastructure investments necessary to keep them competitive andin pace with demand. Tere is a growing trend or cities and the
private sector to take over urban construction, though large SOEsstill dominate in many areas. Land sales are a big component o own
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
29/263
5VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Urban Development Policies
Land Markets and the Physicalransition
ransition towards Pro-UrbanPolicies?
Consequences
source revenues that cities have or inrastructure investments. Tereis growing debate nationally to create new rules or larger cities (e.g.Te Law on the Capital City).
Urban land markets were largely ignored rom 1954 to the 1990s.Te 1993 Land Law was a step orward to release land into the landand housing market. Conversion o armland to urban use acceleratedrapidly, though it was considered to have been chaotic due to low levelso legally recognized land use rights and many inormal transactions.
Te 2003 Land Law urther grants the use o land as a resource inputin business and as eligible or compensation when land is acquiredby the government or development. Te Land Price Framework(generally lower than market rates by 30 - 70%) is intended tostimulate economic development. It is viewed as being successul inattracting real estate investment; but it is also viewed as source o landspeculation, land conicts, and as raising land prices to the end user tobeneft the state and property developers at the expense o the originalland owners and by the creation o a de acto two tiered land pricesystem.
Te Government Decree No. 72 (2001) and Decree No. 42 (2009)established city and town classifcation requirements in an attemptto distinguish between the roles o dierent cities. Te classifcationsystem has implications or administrative unctions, tax collection
and state unding allocations. A possibly unintended consequence hasbeen a trend or cities to exploit loopholes in the classifcation systemto move up in the ranking. Tese moves are largely administrative andnot necessarily based on the actual economic unction o the cities.
Government Decision No. 10 (1998) on the Urban System andDevelopment Strategy to 2020 called or the development omedium and small sized cities and containing the growth o thelargest cities. By 2009, Government Decision No. 445 updating the1998 Decision with a vision to 2050 accepts the possibility o mega-cities with populations over 10 million. Te current thinking is todevelop a system o cities that each play a role in the countrys urban
economy. However, these Decrees are non-binding, and are seen asonly statements o intent.
Te 2011-2020 Socio Economic Development Strategy de actoaccepts that urbanization will be necessary to promote the countrysgoals o industrialization and modernization.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
30/263
6 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Figure 1.1 shows the strong co-movement o Vietnams urbanization and economic growth.Vietnams overall urbanization had been in a similar stage to China, India, and Indonesia until
late 1970s, but then it slowed down as China and Indonesia were -increasing urbanizationand economic growth. Recently, on account o Doi Moi reorms and export-orientedindustrialization policies, Vietnams urbanization also started accelerating. In parallel, economicgrowth, measured by GDP per capita, was strong over the same period. Tis coincides with rapidstructural transormation rom an agriculture-based economy to greater emphasis on industryand export oriented activity (able 1.2). All this suggests that urbanization, as an indicator oeconomic transormation, is linked to economic growth in Vietnam, as everywhere else.
Figure 1.1 Vietnams urbanization and economic growth
Source: World Development Indicators, World Bank
Since urbanization in Vietnam has been accelerating recently, a UN projection suggests thatthe urban population will exceed the rural population by 2040 (United Nations, 2008). Fullyunderstanding the signifcance o upcoming large-scale urban and economic transormationin Vietnam, the Government responded with the new Socioeconomic Development Strategyor the period o 2011-2020. Te strategy aims to continue promoting industrialization andmodernization, along with ast and sustainable development. It also promotes equity acrossthe whole population, towards a predominantly industrial uture with a socialist orientation.In short, the ocus is on bolstering industrialization and urbanization in parallel, while
consolidating social inclusiveness.
Urbanization rate, %
year
%
80
60
40
20
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
VietnamChinaIndia
South KoreaIndonesia
In(GDP per capita)
year
constant2000US$
VietnamChinaIndia
South KoreaIndonesia
201019801960 1970 1990 2000In(50)
In(400)
In(3,000)In(22,000)
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
31/263
7VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
able 1.2 Changing economic structure o Vietnam
Source: World Development Indicators, World Bank
Box 1.1 Socioeconomic development strategy or the period o 2011-2020
Te new Socioeconomic Development Strategy continues to promote industrialization and modernization,ast and sustainable development; equitable social progress; while targeting an industrial uture with socialistorientation. Te Strategy is orientated towards development, innovation, growth and restructuring o theeconomy. Te key priorities are as ollows.
Improve regulation o the socialist-oriented market economy; ensure macroeconomic stability; eective
mobilization o resourcesStrongly develop and modernize industry while improving quality and competitiveness to create oundationsor an industrial country
Comprehensively develop and modernize agriculture while building eciency and sustainability
Strongly develop service industries, especially high value services, with great potential or raisingcompetitiveness
Rapidly develop inrastructure, especially transportation inrastructure
Harmoniously and sustainably develop regions, build up new urban and rural areas
Comprehensively develop cultural and social felds in harmony with economic development
Strongly develop health services and improve the quality o healthcare delivery
Improve the quality o human resources comprehensively; rapidly upgrade education and technical training
Rapidly develop science and technology capabilities which is crucial or ast and sustainable development inindustry and agriculture
Protect and improve environmental quality, proactively and eectively deal with climate change
Strongly maintain independence, sovereignty, territorial unifcation, political security, and social order;extend external relations, actively integrate and improve the position o Vietnam in the international arena.
Sector value-added aspercent o GDP (constant2000 US$)
Agriculture
Industry
(Manuacturing alone)
Services
otal
1985 (A)
37.2
26.2
15.9
37.0
100.0
1990
33.6
26.1
13.9
40.3
100.0
2000
24.5
36.7
18.6
38.7
100.0
2008 (B)
18.5
43.2
25.2
38.3
100.0
Change (B-A)1985-2008
-18.7
16.9
9.3
1.3
0.0
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
32/263
8 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
1.1.2 Vietnams urbanization as fve transitionsTis chapter examines the Vietnam urban system in a system o cities perspective rather thanocusing on a ew selected cities or anecdotal evidence. Tis data intensive quantitative analysisis complemented by comparison with comparator countries, like China, India, and SouthKorea in dierent stages o urbanization and socioeconomic development, and draws lessonsrom their experiences.
Urbanization involves various unctional and spatial transormations needed or long termgrowth and development. Te pace and orm o urbanization are inherently linked to the uidityo actor markets and the provision o basic services. Just as urbanization varies with economicdevelopment across countries, urban transormations, or transitions o socioeconomicstructures, also vary within countries. As countries create the institutional oundations o uidactor markets and progressive social services, some places reap benefts sooner and urbanizerapidly because they oer acilities valued by businesses and workers. Tereore it is importantto understand the patterns o these unctional and structural transitions during the country-specifc urbanization process. Tis chapter considers urbanization as it is characterized by fvetransitions. Assessing these fve dierent dimensions o change provides insights on the extentand orm o urbanization, the unction o cities, and the socioeconomic landscape within theurban portolio.
Figure 1.2 Analytical ramework: fve transitions (or shis)
EconomicShi
PhysicalShi
DemographicShi
AdministrativeShi
WelareShi
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
33/263
9VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Te fve transitions or shis (Figure 1.2) consist o administrative, physical, economic,demographic, and welare changes across the entire Vietnam urban system. Te frst one,
the administrative transition, reers to how the overarching policies, institutional andmanagement practices central to urbanization (as well as issues like the decentralizationagenda), critically inuence the other our transitions. One o its components, the classifcationo cities, constitutes a major area o ocus in this chapter. Te physical transition, examinesurbanization in a spatial dimension, and ocuses on changes to land use as urbanization takes
place. Te economic transition examines the nature and transormations o economic activitydriving urbanization and is oen a driver o the other transitions. Te essence o this chapter is to
provide solid quantitative evidence on how economic transition triggers other transitions (andvice versa). Te demographic transition describes the socioeconomic changes brought aboutby Vietnams economic and spatial transormation (and vice versa). Te welare transitioncorrelated with the economic changes as well as the physical, administrative and demographicchangeswould indicate whether Vietnams urbanization trajectory has improved the well-being o its population, particularly the less privileged.
1.1.3 Statistical defnitions used in the analysis and their limitationsMuch o the analyses ocuses on comparison between the 1999 and 2009 census data. Given thereclassifcation o some provinces in 2003 and 2007, the 1999 regions need to be modifed toconorm to provincial grouping in the 2009 census. Tis chapter sets up consistent geographicdefnitions and boundaries between 1999 and 2009, to maintain comparability in the paneldata. Te details are included in the Appendix 1A, to this chapter.
Te rural-urban demarcation is systematic and clear in the population census, but such is notthe case or specifc sector inormation at local district/commune levels. Appropriate proxymeasures were derived in this case as well as or other un-synchronized data sets collected bydierent government agencies at varied time intervals.
Outside o population and land area, district level data were not available. Tereore most datain the city class and distance quintile typologies, especially in economic, demographic, and
welare transition analyses, are derived rom provincial data using local population size as aconversion actor weight.1 Tereore, the empirical results presented in the chapter need to beinterpreted with this caveat in mind. Despite the caveat, the empirical fndings are consistent
with each other and well aligned with comparator pilot country studies o the World BanksUrbanization Review initiative.
1 For example, the total employment o Hue city is calculated as the total number employed in Tua Tien Hue Province (where Huecity belongs) multiplied by the ratio o Hue city population over Tua Tien Hue province population. Tese city-level fgures are thenaggregated or each typology group.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
34/263
10 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
1.2 Urbanization as administrative and physical transitions:
rapid expansion o urban areas1.2.1 Urban classifcation systemTe Vietnam urban classifcation system, established in 2001 and updated in 2009 with theinception o Decree No. 42/2009/ND-CP, serves as an important part o urban policy andmanagement in Vietnam. It is a hierarchical system constituted by six classes o urban centersthat are defned by dierent levels o economic activities, physical development, population,
population density, and inrastructure provision. Te main eatures o the regional and urbanclassifcation system are depicted in Figure 1.3 and able 1.3.
Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) are the nations two special cities. Tey precede class
1 cities in the urban hierarchy according to the classifcation system and have achieved specialstatus due to their signifcant and unique economic and political contributions to the country.In 2009 there were 2 special cities, 5 class I cities, 12 class II cities, 40 class III towns, 47 class IV
provincial towns, and 625 class V small townships .2
Figure 1.3 Vietnams regional and urban administration hierarchy
Source: Urban Solutions (2011)
2 Tis is the list according to the ocial classifcation system in 2009. More recent changes have been made as recent as 2010 but to matchthe other datasets in this report, the 2009 list is used.
Vietnam
Provinces(58)
Cities directunder centralgovernment
(2+3)
Rural DistrictsProvincial cities owns Urban district owns GeneralDistricts
Communes(rural)
ownships(urban)
Communes(rural)
ownships(urban)
Wards(urban)
Communes(rural) Wards
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
DISRIC LEVEL
COMMUNAL/WARD LEVEL
ownships(urban)
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
35/263
11VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
able 1.3 Proportion o urban population & economic power represented by specialcities, class 1, 2, 3, and 4 urban areas, 2009
Notes:1. Numbers were estimated or sub-province level urban areas as only provincial data was available2. Excluded Hoa Binh ownship in uong Duong District o Nghe An, a sub-district class 3 urban area or which population data is
unavailable.3. Excluded class 4 urban areas at the sub-district level, including: Cam Duong, now a part o Lao Cai Province; Binh Dinh ownship
in An Nhom District o Binh Dinh; Bong Song township is in the Hoai Nhon District o Bin Dinh; Phu Phong ownship in ay SonDistrict o Binh Dinh; Phu Phong ownship in ay Son District o Binh Dinh; Lien Nghia in Duc ruong District o Lam Dong; HatLot ownship in Mai Son District o Lam Dong.
4. Constituent cities and urban areas in each class are based on the 2009 urban classifcation system
Source: General Statistics Oce (GSO) provincial statistics yearbook.
Te administrative system o urban areas and the urban classifcation system provide incentivesor cities and towns to move up the urban class ladder. Striving or higher classifcationstandards has in recent years become a major preoccupation o local government authoritiesas urban areas o higher classes receive greater recognition and shares o fnancial resources.
Coulhart, Quang, & Sharpe (2006) describe how the urban classifcation spurs developmentand creates perverse incentives:
Class V is the smallest urban class and marks the demarcation between urban and rural.Striving or higher classifcation standards is a major preoccupation o local government
authorities as the higher classifcations receive a larger share o state resources. Te classifcationsystem provides incentives or cities to try to move to a higher class. Cities oen make investments
Category
Country
Special class cities
Class 1 cities
Class 2 districts
Class 3 districts (B)
Class 4 districts (C)
Special, class 1, 2, 3 and 4 urban areas as a % o otal Population in Country 36.5%
Special, class 1, 2, 3 and 4 urban areas as a % o otal Urban Population in Country 79.6%
Special, class 1, 2, 3 and 4 urban areas as a % o otal GDP in Country 51.3%
% o
Population Country
85,846,897 100.0%
13,614,773 15.9%
5,286,453 6.2%
3,538,283 4.1%
5,354,288 6.2%
3,522,553 4.1%
Urban % o
Population Country
25,436,896 100.0%
8,612,920 33.9%
3,106,983 12.2%
2,812,254 11.1%
3,986,014 15.7%
1,739,495 6.8%
GDP in millions % o0 VND Country
1,860,296,198 100.0%
567,505,959 30.5%
128,554,679 6.9%
96,993,428 5.2%
105,498,464 5.7%
55,980,660 3.0%
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
36/263
12 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
in inastructure to enable them to meet the requirements o the next classifcation level, ratherthan in direct response to the immediate needs o the population. For example a city or town
may invest in road expansion when there is only limited trac demand, instead o expandingpiped water supply, where clear need exists.
able 1.4 indicates that the urban classifcation system is dynamic as the central governmentreclassifes cities; it can thereore change rom time to time. For example Can To became aClass 1 city in 2004 and with the 2010 changes Bac Lieu moved up rom class 4 to class 3 city.
Combinations o both urban and non-urban areas in each administrative unit exist. It isthereore possible to have rural communes in districts (or towns) and even in urban provincesand/or cities and vice versa. Tis results in rural communes like Can Gio rural district in the
city (and province) o HCMC and Can Tach township (ward) within that same rural district.
able 1.4 Change in Urban Classifcation 1999-2009
Notes:1. Based on 2009 urban classifcation system defnitions.2. Te 2010 amended list specifes 2 special cities, 10 class I (4 direct under gment, 6 district status), 12 class II (districts), 47 class III
(districts), 50 class IV (31 district, 19 ward) and 634 class V.
Source: General Statistics Oce (GSO)
Box 1.2 Criteria to be considered urban
Decree No. 42/2009/ND-CP presents 6 groups o indicators to make a distinction between urban and rural.Circular No. 34/2009/-BXD amplifes the criteria urther. Te most important indicators are as ollwos.
Functions o an urban center: An urban center is a general or specialized center o national, inter-provincial,provincial or district level, or a center o an intra-provincial region, which has the role o promotingsocioeconomic development o the whole country or a certain region.
Special
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Class 5
otal
1999
--
2
8
1264
518
604
2009
2
5
12
4047
625
731
Change
2
3
4
28-17
107
127
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
37/263
13VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Population o an urban center is at least 4,000.
Te population densitysuits the size, nature and characteristics o each urban center grade and is calculatedor the inner area or township's consolidated street quarter. Tis means each urban class requires dierentpopulation densities and the density is calculated with the inner areas o the total urban area (including boththe rural and urban areas).
Non-agricultural labor within the inner area or consolidated street quarter accounts or 65% or more o total.
Urban inrastructure acilities, including social inrastructure acilities and technical inrastructure acilities:
For inner areas, these acilities are built in a synchronous manner and completed to an extent prescribed oreach urban class.
For suburbs and outskirts, inrastructure networks are built in a synchronous manner, satisying environmentalprotection and sustainable urban development requirements.
Urban architecture and landscape: Urban construction and development comply with ApprovedRegulations on Urban Architecture Management (ARUAM). An urban center has model urban quarters,civilized urban streets and public areas or its inhabitants' spiritual lie; and has typical architectural complexesor works suitable to its environment and natural landscape.
Box table 1.2.1 Criteria or classes 1 to 5
Indicators Urban Class
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 51999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009
Population > 1 million
350,000to 1million
100,000-350,000
>150,000 30,000-100,000
>50,000 4,000-30,000
>4,000>300,000
I the class 2is centralgovernmentrun city,
populationshould bemore than800,000
Ratio onon-agricultur-
al labor
Popula-tiondensity
>90%
15,000/km2
>85% orurbancenters
CG:12,000/km2
Provincialcity:10.000/km2
>90%
12,000/km2
>80% or theurbancenters
8,000/km2or10,000/km2i directlyunder thecentralgovernment
>80%
10,000/km2
>70% orurbancenters
6,000/km2
>70%
8,000/km2
>70% orurbancenters
4,000/km2
>60%
6,000/km2
>65%
2,000/km2
Centralgovern-ment runcity (CG):>1 million
Provincialcity:>500thousand
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
38/263
14 VIETNAM URBANIZATION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Socio-economicinfrastruc-turesystem1
Withintegratedsystem
Integratedsystem in
place
Newfactoriesequipped
with cleantechnologyand oldfactoriesretrotted
with
mitigationdevices
Systemcoverage
Withintegratedsystem
UrbanCenters withinfrastruc-ture partiallybuilt for fullintegration
Newfactoriesequipped
with cleantechnologyand old
factoriesretroted
withmitigationdevices
Partiallybuiltsystem
Individualinfrastruc-ture systemin place andgraduallyintegrated
Newfactoriesequipped
with cleantechnologyand old
Partiallybuiltsystem
Individualinfrastruc-ture systemin place andgraduallyintegrated
Newfactoriesequipped
with cleantechnologyand old
Limitedinfrastruc-ture in place
Same asclass 4 in2009
1.2.2 Distribution of cities
Te distribution o cities across city classes and regions is presented in able 1.5, with moredetailed data given in ables 1.6 1.8. wo parallel urban systems can be identied or
Vietnam: (i) Hanoi and its surrounding areas (Northern Midlands, Red River Delta and parto North Central/Central Coast regions) and (ii) HCMC with its surrounding areas (CentralHighlands, Southeast, Mekong River Delta and part o North Central/Central Coast regions).Figure 1.4 visualizes this partition.
Table 1.5 Distribution of cities across city classes and regions in 2009
Indicators Urban Class
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 51999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009 1999 2009
Region City class
Northern Midlands
Red River DeltaNorth Central/Central Coast
Central Highlands
Southeast
Mekong River Delta
otal
Specialcities
.
1.
.
1
.
2
Class 2cities
2
23
2
2
1
12
Class 1cities
.
13
.
.
1
5
Class 3cities
7
119
2
3
9
41
Class 4cities
10
36
4
3
8
34
Total
19
1821
8
9
19
94
Source: General Statistics Ofce (GSO)
1 Included both social inrastructure, such as schools, hospital, police and re stations etc, and technical inrastructure, such as electricityand other utilities.Source: Decree 42.42/ND-CP
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
39/263
15
Te average city size in 2009 and its growth between 1999 and 2009 show a distinct core-periphery structural pattern. Te average city size is much larger in the Southeast and Red RiverDelta regions because o the large metropolitan cities o Hanoi and HCMC. Each o these two
regions accommodates one third (about 10 million) o the total national urban population.City population growth is also relatively higher in these special cities and their neighboringareas. Interestingly, the Northern Midlands region shows strong city population growth whileits average city size is the smallest. On the contrary, cities in other regions o the North Central/Central Coast, Central Highlands, and Mekong Delta experienced lower growth o populationover the same period. Tis pattern is more clearly observed in the cross tabulation o region andcity class (able 1.8). Smaller class 4 cities in the hinterlands o the Central/Central Coast andCentral Highlands regions experienced a net loss o city population in the last ten years.
Figure 1.4 Te rank-size distribution o Vietnamese cities and its North-Southpartition
Note: Te North (South) is above (below) the 17th parallel north.
Source: World Bank sta calculation using data rom GSO
VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Rank-Size Distribution, All Vietnam
ln(rank)
0
2
4
6
ln(pop, 2009)
ln(rank) Fitted values
12 14 16108
VinhBuon Ma TuotHueNha rangBien HoaDa NangHai Phong
Can ToHanoi
HCMC
Rank-Size Distribution, North
ln(rank)
ln(pop, 2009)ln(rank)
80
2
4
6
10 12 14 16
Fitted values
Vinh
Hai Phong
Hanoi
Rank-Size Distribution, South
ln(rank)
ln(pop, 2009)ln(rank)
0
10 12 14 16
2
4
6
Fitted values
Nha rangHueBuon Ma Tuot
Bien HoaDa NangCan To
HCMC
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
40/263
16 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Da Nang is strategically chosen as a key economic growth pole and supposed to unction assuch or the Central region. In act, Da Nangs city growth (2.6% per annum) is higher than
its comparators (1.2% o class 1 cities or 1.1% o North Central/Central Coast region), butit is not strong enough to lead regional growth. Te observed decrease in small city (class 4)population in the same region and also the all o the rural population in Da Nang (-1.9%)suggest that Da Nangs city growth is mainly driven by in-situ urbanization (short distancemigration within the same administrative boundaries or rural-urban land conversion). It isunlikely that Da Nang will grow to play as pivotal a role in the national urban system, as Hanoior Ho Chi Minh City does. In act cities like Can To and Hai Phong might be better placedas the next level o dynamic growth drivers aer Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City.
able 1.6 Average city size in 2009 and growth between 1999 and 2009, by region
able 1.7 Average city size in 2009 and city growth between 1999 and 2009, by city class
Region
Average citypopulation, 2009
Number o cities
otal citypopulation
Annual city popgrowth, 1999-2009, %
NorthernMidlands
85,497
19
1,624,450
3.7%
Red RiverDelta
583,865
18
10,509,567
2.6%
North Central/Central Coast
186,125
21
3,908,632
1.1%
CentralHighlands
160,576
8
1,284,609
1.4%
Southeast
1,002,202
9
9,019,816
3.3%
MekongRiver Delta
241,999
19
4,597,981
1.2%
otal
329,203
94
30,945,055
2.4%
City class
Average citypopulation, 2009
Number o cities
otal citypopulation
Annual city popgrowth, 1999-2009, %
Special cities
6,807,387
2
13,614,773
3.0%
Class 1 cities
1,057,291
5
5,286,453
1.2%
Class 2 cities
294,857
12
3,538,283
2.8%
Class 3 cities
134,743
41
5,524,460
2.6%
Class 4 cities
87,679
34
2,981,086
1.1%
otal
329,203
94
30,945,055
2.4%
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
41/263
17VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
able 1.8 Average city size in 2009 and city growth over 1999 2009 by region andcity class
Specialcities
Class 1cities
Class 2cities
Class 3cities
Class 4cities
Northern Midlandsavg city size 231,178 76,639 62,562
city growth 3.1% 3.7% 4.1%
Red River Deltaavg city size 6,451,909 1,837,173 231,008 141,198 68,430
city growth 2.4% 0.9% 1.7% 5.3% 1.9%
North Central/CentralCoast
avg city size 501,182 301,230 121,197 68,438
city growth 2.0% 2.3% 0.2% -2.7%
Central Highlands avg city size 265,711 175,867 100,364city growth 2.7% 2.2% -0.9%
Southeastavg city size 7,162,864 498,716 149,425 137,082
city growth 3.5% 3.9% 1.3% 0.8%
Mekong River Deltaavg city size 1,945,735 181,367 171,559 115,856
city growth 0.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6%
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
42/263
18 VIETNAM URBANIZATION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Regions and location o cities
in diferent classes
Figure 1.5 Spatial profles o urban population changes between 1999 and 2009
Source: Urban Solutions (2011)
Te concentration o urban populations in large cities is to be expected. As shown in able 1.3.1o Box 1.3, while urbanization in South Korea progressed rom 37% in 1960 to 96% in 2005, the
percentage o population living in cities o more than 1 million increased rom 39% to 51%. Teshare o population living in the capital region (the Seoul metropolitan region and its suburbanareas) rose rom 21% to 48%. At the same time, urban agglomerations have steadily clusteredaround two core centers: Seoul and the Busan metropolitan area (see Figure 1.3.1 o Box 1.3).Te concentration o population and economic activities in core urban clusters is an equilibrium
CAM PU CHIA
CAMBODIA CAM PU CHIACAMBODIA
HI LANHAILAND
HI LANHAILAND
LOLAOS
LOLAOS
RUNG QUCCHINA
RUNG QUCCHINA
BIN NGEAS SEA
BIN NGEAS SEA
LEGENDCities
Class 1 CitiesClass 2 CitiesClass 3 CitiesClass 4 Cities
Urban Population change in %(compare with thenational mean value)
87% to 50% lower49% to 0% lower1% to 50% upper51% to 100% upper101% to 335% upper
he national mean value = 40.7
LEGENDRegions
Red River DeltaNorthern Midlandsand Mountain AreasNorth Central Areaand Central Coastal AreaPortInternational AirportHighwayRailwayNational boundaryProvincial boundary
Central Highlands
Southeast
Mekong River Delta
Class 1 CitiesClass 2 CitiesClass 3 CitiesClass 4 Cities
Urban population change
between 1999 and 2009
HO CHI MINH CIY
0 50 100 200 km 0 50 100 200 km
HOCHIMINHCITY
HA NOIHA NOI
Cities
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
43/263
19VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
outcome o all market participants locating in the best places to maximize economic gains whileminimizing economic costs. In this regard, public policies should be directed towards providing
a level playing feld with uid actor markets so that agglomeration benefts are shared by allmarket participants rather than disproportionately diverted to rent-seekers.
Box 1.3 Urbanization patterns in South Korea
able 1.3.1 South Koreas urbanization progress and city size distribution
Note: Te total population living in cities and towns in terms o administrative districtsSource: Park et al (2011)
Figure 1.3.1: South Koreas spatial concentration o urban population in cities
Categories 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005
Percentage Urban Population 36.8% 50.2% 69.7% 82.6% 93.9% 95.7%
% o Population in the Capital Region 20.8% 28.2% 35.5% 42.8% 46.2% 48.1%
1 Million above 39.2% 5.8% 54.4% 57.6% 51.4% 51.5%
500,000-1 Million 7.2% 4.1% 5.3% 8.5% 15.6% 15.3%
200,000-500,000 10.3% 7.5% 12.8% 12.4% 17.0% 18.9%
50,000-200,000 20.0% 20.4% 14.0% 11.3% 11.0% 9.9%
20,000-50,000 19.6% 13.5% 9.3% 6.4% 2.5% 2.2%
Less than 20,000 3.5% 80.0% 4.2% 3.8% 2.5% 2.3%
Cities byPopulationSize
Source: Park et al (2011)
Less than 20,00020,000 to 50,00050,000 to 200,000200,000 to 500,000500,000 to 1,000,000More than 1,000,000
Legend
1960
1990 2000 2005
1970 1980
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
44/263
20 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
Box 1.4 Decentralization in VietnamFrom the 1990s onward urban areas have become an increasingly important element in the organizationo Vietnamese society. Provinces play a key role in this development and their autonomy vis--viscentral government is constantly expanding, as are their powers and resources. In Vietnam, the ocus odecentralization has been on gradual transer o powers and authority to the provincial level o Government,
which in most cases represent the higher tier o Government within which cities are ound in the Vietnamurban system.
From a legal perspective, local public administration is a local embodiment o the State. Teir budgets aresimply parts o the state budget and, in principle, only serves to implement at the local level the plans defnedat the national level.
Te ollowing three areas o decentralization are considered important or urbanization in Vietnam.
Mandates o planning preparation, appraisal and approval (including Socio-Economic Development Planand General Construction Master Plan). Te Law on Urban Planning in 2009 regulates that provincialunits have authority to prepare the general construction master plan or "big cities" except Hanoi and HoChi Minh City, technical inrastructure system o central government run cities, and unctioning and detailconstruction plans o areas covering more than two districts.
Mandates o fnancial activities (including provincial budget collection, spending and investment decisions).Financial mandates are confned to the ability o provinces to decide budget spending and collection. Budgetspending is mainly on investment and regular activities. Budget collection mainly comes rom taxes, ees,charges, loans and transer rom the central government. As regards tax rates, none o the administrative unitshave authority to defne tax rates which are regulated by ax Laws. Tus, budget collection mandate is limitedto the reedom o provinces to decide on ees, charge rates, transers rom government, and loans.
Mandates o land management: Te land management authority o provinces and districts is confned to (i)land use planning allowance and approval; (ii) land provision and leasing; land use conversion and (iii) land
price. In 2003, the new Land Law was enacted, replacing the Land Law o 1993 and brining several changesto the authority o Provincial and District People Committees in relation to land management:
Te frst revision was to include regulations on land price, whereby the government has the authority toset land prices or regions in which provincial government should base its prices which are to be publicizedon the frst o January every year.In terms o land use planning, the revision included the provision that the Land Use Plan prepared by theProvincial Committee now had to be sent to the People Council frst and then to the Prime Minister orapproval.
In terms o land provision, the revision gave the Provincial Committee the authority to provide and leaseland to organizations, the District Provincial Committee to provide and lease land or individuals; andCommunal, Ward Peoples Committee to lease land or public use.In terms o land conversion, the Provincial Committee was given the authority to decide on landconversion o organizations and individual households in downtown urban areas, while District PeoplesCommittee can decide to land conversions or individual households in the other urban areas.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
45/263
21VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
1.2.3 Physical transitionCity population density profles ollow that o city size distributions (see the urban-ruraldecompositions shown in ables 1.9 and 1.10). Large urban clusters in the Southeast and RedRiver Delta regions and large cities tend to have higher population densities while the densitiesor other regions are quite low. When looked at closely, rural densities are quite low whenorganized by region or by city class, but urban density is very high or the special cities alone.For example, in the densely populated Southeast region and the two largest special cities, theurban city population density is about 10 times higher than in their rural counterparts.
Tere are signifcant variations in density profles in urban and rural areas within city boundaries.In general, or regions, overall city population density is rising during the last ten years, along
with population density in city suburban areas; but the urban population density in regions isdeclining, except or North Central/Central Coast and Southeast regions.
When decomposing city density changes o urban and rural areas within city boundaries intochanges in population versus changes in land size, declining urban population density in citiesis mainly attributable to excessive rural-urban land conversion (beyond accommodating city
population growth per se). Interestingly, only the Southwest region saw a noticeable increase inurban population density, which is mainly driven by the lowest urban land expansion.
Cross-regional variation in city population density changes between 1999 and 2009 is higherthan cross-city class variations (able 1.9 versus able 1.10). It suggests a citys physicaltransition is determined by its location-specifc endowments rather than its urban hierarchical
position (or its location in the city size distribution in a non-spatial context). For example, RedRiver Delta (Hanoi) and Southeast (HCMC) show opposite urban population density trends(1.9% versus 2.6% annual growth rates), while their urban population growth rates are similar(4.4% versus 3.7%). Te main dierence comes rom rural-urban land conversion intensity(8.4% versus 0.9%). Tis dierence can be explained by multiple actors. Recent expansion othe Hanoi city boundary could well be a reason. More importantly, as detailed later, the rapideconomic transitions in Hanoi and the Red River Delta areas toward heavy manuacturing
would have contributed to increasing demand or urban land.
8/2/2019 Vietnam Urbanization Review - Full Report
46/263
22 VIENAM URBANIZAION REVIEWChapter 1: Vietnams Evolving Urban System
able 1.9 City population statistics in 2009 and changes between 1999 and 2009 orregions
Source: General Statistics Oce (GSO)
RegionNorthernMidlands
Red RiverDelta
NorthCentral/Central Coast
CentralHighlands
SoutheastMekongRiverDelta
otal
City population density,total, 2009, persons/ha
10.3 19.2 18.5 5.7 33.6 12.1 21.3
Urban density (a) 28.5 70.4 33.0 16.7 96.6 27.2 62.5
Rural density (b)
Top Related