University of Groningen
The bright side of hierarchiesCantimur, Yeliz
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.
Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:2015
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):Cantimur, Y. (2015). The bright side of hierarchies: The origins and consequences of social stratification inorganizations. [Groningen]: University of Groningen, SOM research school.
CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Download date: 01-04-2020
REFERENCES
137
Adler, N. E., Epel, E., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. (2000). Relationship of subjective and
objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in
healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.
Agho, A. O., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1992). Discriminant validity of measures of job
satisfaction, positive affectivity, and negative affectivity. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 65, 185–196.
Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1999). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization
Science, 10, 741–757.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.
London: Sage.
Alexander, G. A., Chizhik, A. W., Chizhik, E. W., & Goodman, J. A. (2009). Lower-status
participation and influence: Task structure matters. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 365–381.
Alexander, R. D. (1961). Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets
(Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour, 17, 130–223.
Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, S. A. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in
self-managing work teams. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625–42.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product
team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.
Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power
on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,
1362–1377.
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. In A. P. Brief
& B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 55–89). New York: Elsevier.
REFERENCES
138
Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of
Personality, 80, 313–344.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects
of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.
Anderson, C., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). Micropolitics: A new model of status hierarchies in
teams. In M. A. Neale & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp.
49–80). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-
to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503.
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298.
Anderson, C., Spataro, S., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as
determinants of influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 702–710.
Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your
place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 91, 1094–1110.
Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When
do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–
1088.
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge.
Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
REFERENCES
139
Argote, L., Turner, M. E., & Fichman, M. (1989). To centralize or not to centralize: The effects
of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 43, 58–74.
Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207–242.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of
Management Review, 14, 20–39.
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2007). Performance implications of the direct and moderating effects of
centralization and formalization on customer orientation. Industrial Marketing Management,
36, 1022–1034.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., De Boer, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Job demands and job
resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
62, 341–356.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands–resources model to
predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104.
Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & Van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2009). Advancements in crossover
theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 206–219.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A.
Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111–163). Glencoe: Free Press.
Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of
communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461–468.
REFERENCES
140
Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about
network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management
Journal, 49, 49–68.
Balkwell, J. W. (1991). From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for expectation
states theory. American Sociological Review, 56, 355–369.
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the
composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.
Barkow, J. H. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology, 16,
553–572.
Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H., & Geddes, D. (1999). Social and personal determinants of
workplace aggression: Evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the Type A
behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 281–296.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of
the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87, 43–51.
Bartol, K., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational
reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 19, 64–76.
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational
research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8,
274–289.
Becker, T. E., & Martin, S. L. (1995). Trying to look bad at work: Methods and motives for
managing poor impressions in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 174–199.
Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R.
(2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach.
REFERENCES
141
Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572–590.
Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., Trochim, W. M. (2011). Conflict in small groups:
The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42, 127–176.
Belliveau, M. A., O’Reilly, C. A., & Wade, J. B. (1996). Social capital at the top: Effects of
social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39,
1568–1593.
Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323–
340.
Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2005). Men, women, and leadership centralization in groups over
time. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 45–57.
Berger, J., Cohen, B., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction.
American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.
Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical
research program. Cambridge: Winthrop.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and
social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific.
Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and
deligitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual
Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.
Bernstein, I. S. (1969). Stability of the status hierarchy in a pigtail monkey group (Macaca
nemestrina). Animal Behaviour, 17, 452–458.
Bettenhausen, K. L., & Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The development of an intragroup norm and the
effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20–
REFERENCES
142
35.
Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability
organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal,
44, 1281–1299.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1984). Solving costly organizational conflict. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations.
Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25–40.
Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of
management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 1080–1109.
Bottger, P. C. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in
problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 214–221.
Bottger, P. C., & Yetton, P. W. (1988). An integration of process and decision scheme
explanations of group problem solving performance. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 42, 234–249.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Brown, T. J., & Sumner, K. E. (2006). Perceptions and punishments of workplace aggression:
The role of aggression content, context, and perceiver variables. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 36, 2509–2531.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source
of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
REFERENCES
143
Bunderson, J. S. (2003a). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status
characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591.
Bunderson, J. S. (2003b). Team member functional background and involvement in management
teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of
Management Journal, 46, 458–474.
Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why
"bureaucratic" teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21, 609–624.
Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations.
Organization Science, 22, 1182–1194.
Bunderson, J. S., Van der Vegt, G. S., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2014). Status inertia and member
replacement in role-differentiated teams. Organization Science, 25, 57–72.
Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of
interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 308–335.
Burgoon, M., Dillard, J. P., & Doran, N. E. (1983). Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects
of violations of expectations by males and females. Human Communication Research, 10,
283–293.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson,
& D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263−286). New York:
Psychology Press.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological
perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 605–619.
REFERENCES
144
Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness: Case studies from
Central America. Small Group Research, 30, 108–129.
Campbell, A. (1993). Men, women, and aggression. New York: Basic Books.
Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management
Review, 13, 40–52.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, C. (1993). Relations between work group
characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups.
Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.
Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725–741.
Carter, N. M., & Cullen, J. B. (1984). A comparison of centralization/decentralization of decision
making concepts and measures. Journal of Management, 2, 259–268.
Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of
Management Review, 37, 441–470.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1953). Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston: Row,
Peterson.
Carzo, R. Jr., & Yanouzas, J. N. (1969). Effects of flat and tall organization structure.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 178–191.
Chase, I.D. (1980). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative
perspective. American Sociological Review, 45, 905–924.
Chase, I. D., Tovey, C., Spangler-Martin, D., & Manfredonia, M. (2002). Individual differences
versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 5744–5749.
Chen, Y. R., Peterson, R. S., Phillips, D. J., Podolny, J. M., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2012).
Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table – Attaining, maintaining, and
REFERENCES
145
experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23, 299–307.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the
top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and
influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary
foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347.
Chizhik, A. W., Alexander, M. G., Chizhik, E. W., & Goodman, J. A. (2003). The rise and fall of
power and prestige orders: Influence of task structure. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 303–
317.
Christie, A. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance
and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 920–934.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and
compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social
psychology (pp. 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cohen, A. M., Bennis, W. G., & Wolkon, G. H. (1961). The effects of continued practice on the
behaviors of problem-solving groups. Sociometry, 24, 416–431.
Corominas-Murtra, B., Goni, J., Sole, R. V., & Rodriguez-Caso, C. (2013). On the origins of
hierarchy in complex networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 110, 13316–13321.
Correll S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), The
Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 29–51). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup
affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
REFERENCES
146
Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their
consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25, 197–210.
Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The
handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken: Wiley.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large
systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1268–1287.
Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality
of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26,
207–224.
Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
De Botton, A. (2004). Status anxiety. New York: Pantheon Books.
De Church, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of
conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 4–22.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the
effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team
performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88, 741–749.
De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515–524.
De Vries, H., Stevens, J. M. G., & Vervaecke, H. (2006). Measuring and testing the steepness of
dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 71, 585–592.
REFERENCES
147
De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-
analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390.
Demange, G. (2004). On group stability in hierarchies and networks. Journal of Political
Economy, 112, 754–778.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.
Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1962). Studies of interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Conflict
Resolution, 6, 52–76.
Dewar, R., & Werbel, J. (1979). Universalistic and contingency predictions of employee
satisfaction and conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 426–448.
DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: Power,
status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 473–501.
Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review
and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541–553.
Driskell, J. E., Olmstead, B., & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in
task groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 51–60.
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-
level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128–146.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois III, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-
velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31,
737–770.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group
or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778.
REFERENCES
148
Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory. Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J.
Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.). Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–57).
Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in
moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 36, 305–323.
Everett, M. G., & Krackhardt, D. (2012). A second look at Krackhardt’s graph theoretical
dimensions of informal organizations. Social Networks, 34, 159–163.
Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics
and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638–652.
Fan, E. T., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (1998). When needs outweigh desires: The effects of resource
interdependence and reward interdependence on group problem solving. Basic and Applied
Social Psychology, 20, 45–56.
Farrell, D., & Petersen, J. C. (1982). Patterns of political behavior in organization. Academy of
Management Review, 7, 403–412.
Faucheux, C., & Mackenzie, K. D. (1966). Task dependency of organizational centrality – Its
behavioral consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 361–375.
Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R. L., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2007). Strategic
bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. The Leadership
Quarterly, 18, 195–206.
Fisek, M. H., & Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33, 327–346.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of
social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.
REFERENCES
149
Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Social power. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.),
Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 678−692). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Fiske, D. W., & Cox, J. A. Jr. (1960). The consistency of ratings by peers. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 44, 11–17.
Fitness, J. (2000). Anger in the workplace: An emotion script approach to anger episodes
between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 21, 147–162.
Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the
top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123–1137.
Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks,
1, 215–239.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander
(Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 150–167). New York: Harper & Row.
Frick, B., Prinz, J., & Winkelmann, K. (2003). Pay inequalities and team performance: Empirical
evidence from the North American major leagues. International Journal of Manpower, 24,
472–488.
Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design. London: Addison-Wesley.
Gallagher, V. C., Harris, K. J., & Valle, M. (2008). Understanding the use of intimidation as a
response to job tension: Career implications for the global leader. Career Development
International, 13, 648–666.
REFERENCES
150
Gharabaghi, K., & Anderson-Nathe, B. (2013). The inefficiencies of hierarchy. Child & Youth
Services, 34, 1–4.
Gini, C. (1936). On the measure of concentration with special reference to income and statistics.
Colorado College Publication, General Series, 208, 73–79.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.
Gladstein, D. L., & Reilly, N. P. (1985). Group decision making under threat: The Tycoon game.
Academy of Management Journal, 28, 613–627.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.
Gould, R. (2003). Collision of wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greer, L. L. (2014). Power in teams: Effects of team power structures on team conflict and team
outcomes. In N. M. Ashkanasy, O. B. Ayoko, & K. A. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of conflict
management research (pp. 93–108). Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing.
Greer, L. L., Caruso, H. M., & Jehn, K. A. (2011). The bigger they are, the harder they fall:
Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 116, 116–128.
Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2007). The pivotal role of emotion in intragroup process conflict. In
M. Neale, E. Mannix, & C. Anderson (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp.
23–45). Oxford: Elsevier.
Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict transformation: A longitudinal
investigation of the relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the
moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Research, 39, 278–302.
Greer, L. L., Schouten. M. E., De Jong, B., & Dannals, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effects
of hierarchy on team performance. Submitted for publication.
REFERENCES
151
Greer, L. L., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power
dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032–1044.
Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How
high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22, 722–737.
Gruenfeld, D. H., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In
S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp.
1252–1287). New York: Wiley.
Grund, T. U. (2012). Network structure and team performance: The case of English Premier
League soccer teams. Social Networks, 34, 682–690.
Guetzkow, H., & Simon, H. A. (1955). The impact of certain communication nets upon
organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Management Science, 1, 233–250.
Guzzo, R. A. (1986). Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations. In P. S.
Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 34–71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hackman, J. R., Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). The interaction of task design and
group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 16, 350–365.
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how,
and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology
Review, 1, 32–52.
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2012). When hierarchy wins:
Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Social Psychological and Personality
Science, 3, 398–406.
Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism
hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.
REFERENCES
152
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What is the difference? Diversity constructs as separation,
variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between
employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary
perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132.
Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control
in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176.
He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring
a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54,
1119–1139.
Hemelrijk, C. K. (1999). An individual-oriented model of the emergence of despotic and
egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 361–369.
Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z.-X., & Tjosvold, D. (2009). Conflict management between and within
teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 30, 41–65.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a
mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human
Behavior, 22, 165−196.
Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one?
Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517–539.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conception of groups as
information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64.
REFERENCES
153
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy. Small
Group Research, 21, 190–204.
Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The
handbook of social psychology (pp. 485–537). New York: Random House.
Huang, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2011). When critical knowledge is most critical: Centralization in
knowledge-intensive teams. Small Group Research, 42, 669–699.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements
toward a network theory of getting things done. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.),
Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 165–188). Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. Jr. (1975). Relation of organizational structure to job
satisfaction, anxiety-stress, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 272–280.
Izar, P., Ferreira, R. G., & Sato, T. (2006). Describing the organization of dominance
relationships by dominance-directed tree method. American Journal of Primatology, 68,
189–207.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 67, 219–229.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability
with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
Janssen, O., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2011). Positivity bias in employees' self-ratings of
performance relative to supervisor ratings: The roles of performance type, performance-
approach goal orientation, and perceived influence. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 20, 524–552.
REFERENCES
154
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup
conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational
groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency
perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25,
187–242.
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types,
dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17,
465–495.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of
intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A
field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
Jewell, R. T., & Molina, D. J. (2004). Productive efficiency and salary distribution: The case of
U.S. major league baseball. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, 127–142.
Johnson, C., Funk, S. J., & Clay-Warner, J. (1998). Organizational contexts and conversation
patterns. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 361–371.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research.
Edina: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, C., & Skon, L. (1981). The effects of
cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-
analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.
REFERENCES
155
Joshi, A., & Knight, A. P. (2014). Who defers to whom and why? Demographic differences and
dyadic deference in teams. Submitted for publication.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A
qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.
Kalkhoff, W., & Barnum, C. (2000). The effects of status-organizing and social identity
processes on patterns of social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 95–115.
Kalma, A. (1991). Hierarchisation and dominance assessment at first glance. European Journal
of Social Psychology, 21, 165–181.
Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1995). Procedural influence in two-step group decision making:
Power of local majorities in consensus formation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 69, 865–876.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104.
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance:
Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523–544.
Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A
conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 229–248.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition.
Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of
social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology, 40, 151–192.
REFERENCES
156
Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). The discovery of structural form. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 10687–10692.
Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally-
dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.
Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared,
hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 51, 590–621.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C.
Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and
organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). London: Wiley.
Krackhardt, D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In Carley, K. &
Prietula, M. (Eds.), Computational organizational theory (pp. 89–111). Hillsdale: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Kyl-Heku, L. M., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology:
An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences,
21, 497–517.
Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
Leavitt, H. J. (2005). Top down: Why hierarchies are here to stay and how to manage them more
effectively. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lee, M. T., & Ofshe, R. (1981). The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on
social influence: A test of two competing theories. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 73–82.
Leonard, J. S. (1990). Executive pay and firm performance. Industrial and Labor Relations
Review, 43, 13–29.
REFERENCES
157
Libby, R., Trotman, K. T., & Zimmer, I. (1987). Member variation, recognition of expertise, and
group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 81–87.
Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-
output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877–889.
Lord, R. G. (1977). Functional leadership behavior: Measurement and relation to social power
and leadership perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 114–133.
Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership
perceptions, and behavioral measurement in organizational settings. Research in
Organizational Behavior, 7, 87–128.
Lord, R. G., Phillips, J. S., & Rush, M. C. (1980). Effects of sex and personality on perceptions
of emergent leadership, influence, and social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 176–
182.
Lorsch, J. W., & Morse, J. (1974). Organizations and their members: A contingency approach.
New York: Harper & Row.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new
product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications
perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–783.
Lucas, J. W., & Baxter, A. R. (2012). Power, influence, and diversity in organizations. The
Annals of the American Academy, 639, 49–70.
Lucas, J. W., & Lovaglia, M. J. (1998). Leadership status, gender, group size, and emotion in
face-to-face groups. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 617–637.
Lund, O. C. H., Tamnes, C. K., Moestue, C., Buss, D. M., & Vollrath, M. (2007). Tactics of
hierarchy negotiation. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 25–44.
REFERENCES
158
MacDonald, L. A. C. (2005). Wellness at work: Protecting and promoting employee well-being.
London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development Publishing.
Mackenzie, K. (1966). Structural centrality in communications networks. Psychometrika, 31, 17–
25.
Magee, J. C., & Frasier, C. W. (2008). Status and power: The principal inputs to influence for
public managers. Public Administration Review, 74, 307–317.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power
and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
Main, B. G. M., O'Reilly III, C. A., & Wade, J. (1993). Top executive pay: Tournament or
teamwork? Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 606–628.
Marmot, M. (2004). Status syndrome: How your social standing directly affects your health and
life expectancy. London: Bloomsbury.
Marsh, R. M. (1992). A research note: Centralization of decision-making in Japanese factories.
Organization Studies, 13, 261–274.
Martin, J. L. (2009). Formation and stabilization of vertical hierarchies among adolescents:
Towards a quantitative ethology of dominance among humans. Social Psychology Quarterly,
72, 241–264.
Mast, M. S. (2002). Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males'?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 29–39.
Matsuo, M. (2006). Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales
departments. Journal of Business Research, 59, 242–250.
Mazur, A. (1973). A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. American
Sociological Review, 38, 513–530.
REFERENCES
159
Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64,
377–402.
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 21, 353–363.
McDonald, D. B., & Shizuka, D. (2013). Comparative transitive and temporal orderliness in
dominance networks. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 511–520.
McDonough III, E. F., & Leifer, R. (1983). Using simultaneous structures to cope with
uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 727–735.
Moosa, M. M., & Ud-Dean, S. M. M. (2011). The role of dominance hierarchy in the evolution of
social species. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 203–208.
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work:
Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & M. Brower (Eds.), What’s so
social about social cognitions? Social cognition in small groups (pp. 57–84). Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing
and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.
Morris, M. W., Larrick, R., & Su, S. K. (1999). Misperceiving negotiation counterparts: When
situationally determined bargaining behaviors are attributed to personality traits. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 52–67.
Nelson, P. D., & Berry, N. H. (1965). Changes in sociometric status during military basic training
related to performance two years later. Journal of Psychology, 61, 251–255.
Overbeck, J. R., Correll, J. C., & Park, B. (2005). The internal sorting process of group status:
The problem of too many stars. In M. Hunt-Thomas, E. Mannix, & M. A. Neale (Eds.),
REFERENCES
160
Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 169–199). St. Louis: Elsevier.
Passos, A. M., & Caetano, A. (2005). Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past
performance feedback on team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 231–
244.
Pearce, J. L. (2001). Less epistemology; More government and social status. Human Relations,
54, 85–89.
Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
Pfeffer, J. (2009). Understanding power in organizations. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.),
Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 17–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and
working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 38, 382–407.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method
biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation
hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–
227.
Pugh, D. S., & Hickson, D. J. (1976). Organizational structure in its context: The Aston Program
I. Farnborough Hants: Saxon House.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data
analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
REFERENCES
161
Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I.D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current
studies in social psychology (pp. 371–382). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Ravlin, E. C., & Thomas, D. C. (2005). Status and stratification processes in organizational life.
Journal of Management, 31, 966–987.
Rees, C. R., & Segal, M. W. (1984). Intragroup competition, equity, and interpersonal attraction.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 328–336.
Richards, D. G., & Guell, R. C. (1998). Baseball success and the structure of salaries. Applied
Economic Letters, 5, 291–296.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups.
American Sociological Review, 52, 683–694.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male
and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Walker, H. A. (1995). Status structures. In S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. H.
House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281–310). Boston: Allyn
& Bacon.
Rink, F. A., Kane, A. A., Ellemers, N., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2013). Team receptivity to
newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes. The Academy of
Management Annals, 7, 247–293.
Roberson, Q. M., Sturman, M. C., & Simons, T. L. (2007). Does the level of dispersion matter in
multilevel research? A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes.
Organizational Research Methods, 10, 564–588.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-
dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.
REFERENCES
162
Roby, T. B., Nicol, E. H., & Farrell, F. M. (1963). Group problem solving under two types of
executive structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 550–556.
Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved
with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness.
Psychological Science, 23, 669–677.
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and
group performance. Management Science, 46, 612–625.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority
group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.
Salin, D. (2003a). Bullying and organizational politics in competitive and rapidly changing work
environments. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4, 35−46.
Salin, D. (2003b). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating, and
precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56,
1213−1232.
Salk, J. E., & Brannen, M. Y. (2000). National culture, networks, and individual influence in a
multinational management team. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 191−202.
Sande, G. N., Ellard, J. H., & Ross, M. (1986). Effect of arbitrarily assigned status labels on self-
perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 50, 684–689.
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of
Anthropology, 33, 393–418.
Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648–
652.
REFERENCES
163
Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child
Development, 50, 923–935.
Schjelderupp-Ebbe, T. (1935). Social behavior in birds. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of
social psychology (pp. 947–972). Worcester: Clark University Press.
Schoel, C., Bluemke, M., Mueller, P., & Stahlberg, D. (2011). When autocratic leaders become
an option - Uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 521–540.
Schrag, C. (1954). Leadership among prison inmates. American Sociological Review, 19, 37–42.
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1993). Effects of consensus and devil’s advocacy on strategic
decision-making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 126–139.
Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental
design for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Shah, P. P., & Jehn, K. A. (1993). Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction
of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149–165.
Shaw, M. E. (1954). Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solution efficiency in
different communication nets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 211–217.
Shaw, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental
social psychology (pp. 111–147). New York: Academic Press.
Shizuka, D., & McDonald, D. B. (2012). A social network perspective on measurements of
dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 83, 925–934.
REFERENCES
164
Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Pay disparities within top management groups:
Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science,
16, 259–274.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with
linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476.
Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2012). Status hierarchies and the organization of
collective action. Sociological Theory, 30, 149–166.
Sirot, E. (2000). An evolutionarily stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups.
Behavioral Ecology, 11, 351–356.
Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2010). Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution.
Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 203–211.
Sneddon, L. U., Hawkesworth, S., Braithwaite, V. A., & Yerbury, J. (2006). Impact of
environmental disturbance on the stability and benefits of individual status within dominance
hierarchies. Ethology, 112, 437–447.
Sonnentag, S. (1995). Excellent software professionals: Experience, work activities, and
perceptions by peers. Behaviour and Information Technology, 14, 289–299.
Sonnentag, S., & Volmer, J. (2009). Individual-level predictors of task-related teamwork
processes: The role of expertise and self-efficacy in team meetings. Group and Organization
Management, 34, 37–66.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions,
measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.
Srivastava, S., & Anderson, C. (2011). Accurate when it counts: Perceiving power and status in
social groups. In J. L. Smith, W. Ickes, J. Hall, S. D. Hodges, & W. Gardner (Eds.),
Managing interpersonal sensitivity: Knowing when–and when not–to understand others (pp.
REFERENCES
165
41–58). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., & Pelled, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favorable
outcomes at the workplace. Organization Science, 5, 51–71.
Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during
collective recall and decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,
619–628.
Stogdill, R. M. (1959). Individual behavior and group achievement. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York:
Free Press.
Strayer, F., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance
relations among preschool children. Child Development, 47, 980–989.
Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2009). Well-being and organizational performance: An
organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work and Stress, 23,
120–136.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L.
Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651–718). Palo
Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of
negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 80, 86–94.
Tiedens, L. Z., Unzueta, M. M., & Young, M. J. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy?
The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of
REFERENCES
166
Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 402–414.
Tjosvold, D. (1981). Unequal power relationships within a cooperative or competitive context.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 137–150.
Tjosvold, D. (1984). Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations, 37, 743–767.
Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive dynamics within and between organizational
units. Human Relations, 41, 425–436.
Tjosvold, D., & Deemer, D. K. (1981). Effects of a control or collaborative orientation on
participation in organizational decisionmaking. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13,
33–43.
Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1984). Influence strategy, perspective-taking, and
relationships between high- and low-power individuals in cooperative and competitive
contexts. Journal of Psychology, 116, 187–202.
Treadway, D. C., Breland, J. W., Williams, L. M., Cho, J., Yang, J., & Ferris, G. R. (2013).
Social influence and interpersonal power in organizations: Roles of performance and political
skill in two studies. Journal of Management, 39, 1529–1553.
Trevor, C. O., Reilly, G., & Gerhart, B. (2012). Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the
performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of
Management Journal, 55, 585–610.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.
Tsui, A. S. (1984). A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behavior and
Human Performance, 34, 64–96.
Tushman, M. L. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A
contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 82–98.
REFERENCES
167
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of
Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than
others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 89, 813–838.
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex
and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408.
Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. Jr. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes
within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322–338.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1979). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York:
Wiley Interscience.
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary
teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal,
48, 532–547.
Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, J. S., & Oosterhof, A. (2006). Expertness diversity and
interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least.
Academy of Management Journal, 49, 877–893.
Van der Vegt, G. S., De Jong, S., Bunderson, J. S., & Molleman, E. (2010). Power asymmetry
and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organization Science,
21, 347–361.
Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating effects of task and
outcome interdependence in work teams. Group and Organization Management, 23, 124–
143.
REFERENCES
168
Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Team members' affective
responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of
Management, 26, 633–655.
Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–371.
Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in
social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40,
1–13.
Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying - psychological work environment and organizational
climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 203–214.
Vodosek, M. (2007). Intragroup conflict as a mediator between cultural diversity and work group
outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 345–375.
Walker, H. A., Thomas, G. M., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1986). Legitimation, endorsement, and
stability. Social Forces, 64, 620–643.
Wall, V., & Nolan, L. (1986). Perceptions of inequality, satisfaction, and conflict in task oriented
groups. Human Relations, 39, 1033–1052.
Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence.
Academy of Management Journal, 48, 282–296.
Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1999). The crossover of strain from school principals to teachers and
vice versa. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 269–278.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge.
Social Forces, 76, 571–603.
REFERENCES
169
Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action
problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43.
Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A
review of 40 years of research. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in
organizational behavior (pp.77–140). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral
sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585–608.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Withey, M., Daft, R. L., & Cooper, W. H. (1983). Measures of Perrow's work unit technology:
An empirical assessment and a new scale. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 45–63.
Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011). The effects of top management team
integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1207–1228.
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 37, 60–82.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as
predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 84–94.
Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favorable work outcomes: Two longitudinal
tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–23.
Yukl, G., & Tracey, B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers,
and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.
Zitek, E. M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2012). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which
hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 102, 98–115.
Top Related