7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
1/12
Supply Chain Trust
January, 2012
Special Issue
7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
2/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Special Issue Introduction Supply Chain Trust
This months special issue explores the state of research and practice pertaining to supply chain trust.
The topic of trust is not new and has been extensively studied in the fields of psychology, sociology and
even economics. Its study, however, has largely been focused at the individual level. Supply chain
research on trust, however, extends the domain of applicability to that of the firm and this representsfertile ground for research that is relevant to todays business environment. While economists such as
Williamson (1985) and Arrow (1974) lead the discussion on the impact of trust on firm behavior,research in a supply chain context only began in earnest about 15 years ago. The articles abstracted this
month highlight varying dimensions of supply chain trust that have been researched over the past 15
years. While they are not an attempt to be all inclusive of this field of research, they represent the key
ideas moving forward.
Early in his academic career, Gulati (1995) empirically demonstrates that a repetitive alliance formation
between two firms generates trust and that subsequent alliances are more likely to involve less formal
and less complex contracts such as nonequity-based contracts. A more recent study by Gulati and
Nickerson (2008) weighs in on the debate of whether trust serves as a substitute for contracts or whetherit acts as a complement to contracts. The two authors find that both can be true and provide empirical
support to this point.
One of the challenges faced by researchers in this field is agreeing on a common definition and
measurement system of trust. Two of the articles in this special issue deal with this topic: Jones et.al.(2010) and Laeequddin et.al. (2010). While Jones et.al. focus on the two most relevant dimensions of
trust to supply chain management (trust in competence and goodwill), Laeequddin et.al. provide a more
broad overview of trust research as found in the fields of not only business, but also of psychology and
sociology. These two papers are solid reference articles for those embarking on supply chain trust
research.
Building on the Jones et.al. (2010) study, Ha et.al. (2011) explore the two dimensions of affective trust(goodwill) and competency trust and empirically show its impact on logistics efficiency. A more refined
categorization scheme is presented by Fawcett et.al. (2004) wherein the authors suggest five dimensions
of supply chain trust.
While few would argue that supply chain trust yields positive results, the reality observed by empirical
analysis confirms that this concept remains elusive for most firms. The question then becomes, why is it
elusive? Why are firms struggling with the implementation of increased trust-based relationships?
In their seminal 2008 paper, Fawcett et.al. (2008) present a framework that highlights the management
change process that is required for firms to embrace supply chain collaboration. A key point in thisarticle is the role that top management plays in moving such a transformation forward. This topic of
supply chain leadership is further discussed in Fawcett et.al. (2010).
Summarizing the state of supply chain relationship research over the past few decades, Daugherty
(2011) highlights not only what has been done, but what ripe opportunities exist for further research in
this area, including test-based research.
We hope you enjoy this special issue on supply chain trust!
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
3/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: Review of logistics and supply chain relationship literature and suggested research agenda
Journal: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2011, Vol. 41, No. 1,
pp. 16-31
Authors: Patricia A. Daugherty
Key Words: strategic alliances, distribution management, partnership, supply chain management
http://search.proquest.com/docview/846768440?accountid=130991
Overview: A general review of relationship-focused research in logistics and supply chain management
areas is provided followed by suggested areas for further research. The author makes it clear that the
review is not comprehensive, but tries to be chronological and thematic in addition to focusing on
relationally governed situations (Rinehart et al. 2004).
In the 1980s and 90s, partnerships and alliances began to be more prominent in supply chain research.Early research examined what contributes to successful alliances and partnerships.
The focus on alliances and partnerships gradually evolved into the more general topic of collaboration.
Initial research sought to define collaboration and establish its benefits. Empirical research followedthat identified antecedents to collaboration and also the three constructs of behaviors, culture and
relationship interaction. Though much has been done, Daugherty outlines numerous opportunities for
further research. General ideas on the following topics are discussed below.
1. Partnerships/alliances/collaborative relationships Though many of these work, many others failor fall short. Research needs to be done to identify if this is due to current models or external
effects such as the economic downturn. It might be productive to look at more than just a onebuyer-one seller relationship. Another potential topic is how relationships are maintained over
time to ensure that they remain healthy and worthwhile.
2. Improving chances of success Selective matching is already known to be an important factor,but if personal relationships are important, how is this managed to ensure success? Is it better to
make purposeful decisions regarding personnel or to create cross-firm teams? How do cultural
differences influence success?
3. Has the issue of power gone away? Are there principles that can be used to safeguard thesmaller partner and still encourage good relationships?
4. Metrics and monitoring What are the most important metrics in measuring trust? Are thesestatic or variable over time? Monitoring requires accountability. Is it possible to develop astandard approach to monitoring relationships? If not, are there certain elements that contribute
to success?
5. Innovation There is a surprising lack of literature on logistics-focused innovation. One area ofpotential interest is the science of service and service innovation (Ostrom et al 2010).
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/846768440?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/846768440?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/846768440?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
4/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
6. Technology This includes research into how to prepare for future technologies and how to bestuse current ones in terms of increasing efficiency and cross-firm integration. It also involves
investigating which technologies are the best in terms of improving performance.
7. Focus on service Many current models focus on products rather than services, yet manyeconomies depend more on service related industries. Research could examine the pricing andvaluing of service, service branding, creating a service culture, and all of the relationships
involved in these processes. This area invites collaboration with researchers outside of the
business department.
Although much has been documented regarding relationships, there are clearly many more
opportunities to do more.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
5/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: Supply Chain Trust is Within Your Grasp
Journal: Supply Chain Management Review, 2004, March, pp. 20-26
Authors: Stanley E. Fawcett, Gregory M. Magnan, Alvin J. Williams
Key Words: trust, interorganizational relationships, supply chain management
http://search.proquest.com/docview/221137287?accountid=130991
Overview: Trust is recognized as a key factor in improving supply chain collaboration. This paper
argues that the gap between this recognition and its application is wide as evidenced by the consistent
complexity of contracts between collaborators. Surveys and case studies provided the data for thisresearch. The case studies were based on interviews with managers from various industries that
represented all points along a supply chain. Through this process, the researchers sought to extract the
participants views on trust and collaboration. From the responses, five dimensions of trust are
explained offering a pathway to developing and strengthening trust in collaborations.
The Performance Dimension For trust to exist, there must be performance. This means that companiesmust consistently fulfill commitments. Survey responses revealed that promises made by another
company are often doubted and routinely reduced by a set amount before decisions are made whether or
not to proceed in order to compensate for the tendency to overpromise. It is clear that keeping promises
will increase trust.
The Information-Sharing Dimension All information pertinent to a relationship or project must beopenly shared for true trust to exist. This includes sharing sales data, forecasts, production plans and
new product information. Some companies use quarterly business reviews or other opportunities to
ensure that this happens regularly. The joint use of computer systems is not necessarily indicative of
trust and can backfire if it is seen as an attempt to gain an advantage.
The Behavioral Dimension Behaviors that foster trust include the sharing risks and benefits and
investment in a partners capabilities, In fact, how well risks and benefits are shared is one of the most
powerful indicators of trust. It is important that buyers treat suppliers well and assume some of the riskwhen certain expectations are laid out. Investing in supply chain partners demonstrates that the
relationship is important.
The Personal Dimension Trust inherently relies on personal relationships. Buyers and suppliers may
not trust each others respective companies, but they must trust each other. These types of relationships
can be encouraged through more one-on-one interaction, customer and supplier visits, and stable
account management teams.
The Two-Worlds Dimension This dimension describes the fact that suppliers are generally more
dissatisfied with the level of trust than buyers. The reason? Power. When power is skewed, trust is
harder to establish.
For companies wanting to build trust these five dimensions can be applied using the following five
behaviors:
1. Keep promises made.2. Rely on open, not selective communication.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/221137287?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/221137287?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/221137287?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
6/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
3. Employ behaviors that show the other party is valued.4. Build personal relationships.5. Ensure that relationships are fair and mutually beneficial.
An assessment of a companys culture of trust may also help direct future decisions. This must be done
from and internal and external perspective to be valid. An outline of one way to carry out this type of
assessment is shown in exhibit 2.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
7/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: A three-stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration
Journal: Journal of Business Logistics, 2008, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 93-113
Authors: Stanley E. Fawcett, Gregory M. Magnan, Matthew W. McCarter
Key Words: change management, transformational leadership, supply chain collaboration, qualitative
study, in-depth interviews
http://search.proquest.com/docview/212603139?accountid=130991
Overview: This article explores the key question of how a firm can successfully undergo the
transformational process towards a supply chain orientation. Building on Lewins force theory, authors
Fawcett et.al. depict a three-stage transformational process by which firms can achieve suchtransformation. The first stage is called unfreeze this includes the initial awareness of the need for
change and a conscious willingness to do so. Often such awareness arises out of crises or leadershipchange. The second stage is called movement and is the unsteady, transformational state where afirm begins its initial foray into the change. Pilot projects are often used to vet out the pros and cons of
the change and also generate the needed evidence so that management can more effectively evangelize
the virtues of the proposed change. The third and final phase is called refreeze and is the process by
which the change becomes institutionalized and refined.
The authors conducted 51 in-depth interviews of firms across four different supply chain positions:retailers, finished-goods assemblers, direct material suppliers, and logistics service providers. The
purpose of the interviews was to explore what practices firms used in pursuing successful collaborative
relationships with their supply chain partners. A list of 25 of the top practices and requirements ispublished in the paper. The list is broken down into six key categories and include: management
commitment, supply chain mapping and role definition, information sharing and system integration,people management and development, supply chain performance measurement and relationshipmanagement/trust building. While many of the firms were found to be engaged in implementing a
number of the listed practices, most found the change management process challenging. The interviews
suggested that the lack of collaboration is not a result of inadequate initiative, but rather a lack of
maturity in managing the change process (pg.105).
The findings of this paper hint that the key to success lies perhaps in better understanding the underlyingcorporate culture that drives the attitudes and perceptions of employees in implementing supply chain
collaboration in their firms. A study of best practices alone may not yield the necessary explanations of
what leads to success and what leads to failure in this endeavour. One key example related to this
Ontario Institute special issue is the implementation of trust in business relationships. Anytransformational efforts to increase the use of trust in business relationships is most likely going to
require a cultural transformation as opposed to a more concerted effort to implement any specificpractice. This article lays the groundwork for follow-on studies that may want to take a more focused
approach on the role of culture in achieving supply chain collaboration transformation.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/212603139?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/212603139?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/212603139?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
8/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: The Indispensable Supply Chain Leader
Journal: Supply Chain Management Review, 2010, September/October, pp. 22-29
Authors: Stanley E. Fawcett, Joseph C. Andraski, Amydee M. Fawcett, Gregory M. Magnan
Key Words: trust, supply chain leader, cross-functional
http://search.proquest.com/docview/903552556?accountid=130991
Overview: The authors introduce the concept of an indispensable supply chain leader, This individual
possesses more than the requisite knowledge and skills to carry out supply chain processes. He also
possesses a mindset and perspective that allow him to coordinate the supply chain effectively. This type
of leader is extremely hard to find as interviews with 112 companies in Asia, Europe and the U.S.
revealed. Four characteristics of these indispensable leaders are described.
First of all, an indispensable supply chain leader can be described as a cross-functionalist. This involvesmore than just functional skills and encompasses the ability to lead a collaborative effort. This type of
person is critical to improving supply chain collaboration in general. To develop cross functionalistemployees, companies take one of several approaches keeping in mind that the goal is to provide
exposure, experience, and responsibility along the entire supply chain. Some companies have long-term
training programs where new hires are rotated to a new function or area with more supervisory authority
after a period of 1-2 years. The drawback is that many firms do not have 10 years to fully invest in anemployee. Another option is fast-track cross-experiencing that reduces the length of the program to 2
years. Other companies are trying out rotations that last 3-6 months and cover all the basic areas within
the business. One more option is to involve managers in task forces and projects outside of his normalresponsibilities. It is important to note that companies must beware of competitors that try to poach
these supply chain leaders.
Indispensable supply chain leaders are also choreographers; they are able to select the right personnel
and get them to work together efficiently. Choosing the right people is a skill that many possess.
Orchestrating the group is more difficult as it relies more on creativity and intuition.
Another role of the indispensable supply chain leader is that of coach. This incorporates teaching and
motivating as well as correcting. The ability to perform these tasks well relies on trust. In particular,
those involved must trust that the coach has their best interests in mind. A person with this skill set is
especially difficult to find today, but is critical to effective collaboration. Coaching must not be
confused with control.
The last character is that of champion. Supply chain champions possess a strong work ethic, creativity
and personal influence based on credibility. Because of this, they are highly successful in teams or
when delegating tasks to others. Successful champions share four behaviors. They scan constantly,take proactive risks, create safe harbors, and cultivate and celebrate successes. These behaviors lead to
greater trust and better performance.
Cultivating indispensable supply chain leaders may be a scary prospect, but it can be done. Many
companies are taking steps to develop these types of employees. Doing so will lead to better
collaboration, increased trust and improved performance.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/903552556?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/903552556?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/903552556?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
9/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance
Journal: Organization Science, 2008, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 688-708
Authors: Ranjay Gulati and Jack A. Nickerson
Key Words: interorganizational relations, supply chain trust, transaction cost economics, case study,
switching regression
http://search.proquest.com/docview/213831780?accountid=130991
Overview: Williamson (1991) argued that firms organize their resources according to a myriad of
determinants that include the costs associated with supplier search, contract generation and contractenforcement. Firms can choose one of three methods: buy product x from the market, ally with a firm
(alliance or joint venture) to make product x or make product x internally. Williamson recognized that
interorganizational trust could serve to reduce the costs associated with developing and enforcing
contracts associated with the three options. Since Williamsons early work, many studies have been
conducted that empirically confirm Williamsons theory of transaction cost economics. These studieshave also given rise to an interesting debate: some argue that trust can serve as a substitute for contracts
while others argue that trust serves as a complement to contracts.
In this article, Gulati and Nickerson explore the two sides of the trust debate and hypothesize that trustcan serve as both a substitute and as a complement to contracts under certain conditions. At the
condition where a firm is marginally disposed towards one of the three organization structures, trust may
reduce transaction costs sufficiently to sway the decision to another structure. In this case, trust serves
as a substitute. Further, the authors argue that irrespective of governance choice, all interorganizationalrelationships benefit from trust given the reduced operating costs and risks assumed. In this sense, trust
is a complement to contracts as it improves the operational efficiency of the dyad by decreasing cost.
In order to test their hypotheses, Gulati and Nickerson use data from a survey of 222 sourcingarrangements at 2 large automotive OEMs (Ford and Chrysler). Additionally, the authors conduct in-depth case studies to refine their survey instrument. Using switching regression, they find empirical
support for their hypotheses and confirm that trust can serve both as a substitute and a complement to
contracts bv min interorganizational relationships.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/213831780?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/213831780?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/213831780?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
10/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: Suppliers affective trust and trust in competency in buyers
Journal: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2011, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 56-77
Authors: Byoung-Chun Ha, Yang-Kyu Park, Sungbin Cho
Key Words: trust, suppliers, buyers, supply chain management, korea
http://search.proquest.com/docview/817162326?accountid=130991
Overview: This study examines trust and its effect on supply chain collaboration and logistics
efficiency. It differs from previous studies in two ways. First, trust is examined from the viewpoint of
supplier not buyers. Second, trust is divided into two categories: affective trust and trust incompetency. Affective trust encompasses the emotional aspects of a long-term, inter-personal
relationship such as openness, positive mutual understanding, honesty, and respect. Trust in
competency refers to the expectation of certain behaviors based on the knowledge, and expertise of the
other party. This includes business capability, a willingness to accept partners expertise, and unique
knowledge/skills. The construct of logistics efficiency was used to measure overall performance andcollaboration based on five categories: order fill rate, order fulfillment lead time, operations flexibility,
inventory turnover, and total logistics cost.
Data was collected using surveys of supply chain managers within Korean companies that functioned assuppliers. These companies represented many different industries. Path analysis, using PROC CALIS
was applied to examine the effects of affective trust and trust in competency on the three dimensions of
supply chain collaboration, which are joint decision-making, information sharing, and benefit/risk
sharing. Then, the effect of these three dimensions on logistics efficiency was investigated. Allconstructs satisfied the condition of the standardized Cronbach alpha value being greater than or close to
0.7 thus showing them to be reliable. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed model
was valid.
Data analysis showed that affective trust had a significant impact on supply chain collaboration withrespect to information sharing. Trust in competency had an effect on joint decision-making. Both types
of trust influenced benefit/risk sharing. Joint decision making and information sharing in turn affected
logistics efficiency. The three relationships between affective trust and joint decision-making, trust incompetency and information sharing, and benefit/risk sharing and logistics efficiency were shown to be
insignificant. These results are not general since the scope of the study was limited to a particular
region. Further analysis is required to see if the model applies generally. Other potential areas of
research would take into account cultural effects and power relationships between suppliers and buyers.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/817162326?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/817162326?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/817162326?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
11/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 Dund as Stree t West, PO Box 64, Suite 2704 Toro nto , Onta rio M5G 1Z3 Tel. 416-977-7566 Fax. 416-977-4135info@oipma c.c a www.oipmac.ca
Title: Benchmarking trust signals in supply chain alliances: moving toward a robust measure of
trust
Journal: Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2010, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 705-727
Authors: Stephen L. Jones, Stanley E. Fawcett, Amydee M. Fawcett, Cynthia Wallin
Key Words: trust, supply chain management, collaboration, measuring trust
http://search.proquest.com/docview/749474395?accountid=130991
Overview: This paper accomplishes three main objectives: 1) it provides an overview of how
interorganizational trust has been measured in past supply chain research, 2) it proposes two differentdimensions of trust that have previously been combined into a single construct, and 3) it empirically
highlights five different signals that firms can use to build trust with supply chain partners.
Authors Jones et.al. first discuss the two key dimensions of trust: competence and goodwill.
Competence trust exists when a firm believes in the capabilities of another firm to execute according tocontract. This belief is either supported or weakened through repeated delivery and paymentperformance that either confirms or disconfirms the initial belief. Goodwill trust, however, concerns the
belief of a firm that the other firm desires fairness in all outcomes and will work to maintain that fairness
irrespective of the opportunities that exist to do otherwise. These dimensions are considered orthogonaland should be measured separately. Jones et.al. list five prior supply chain papers published that mix
these dimensions of trust and argue that future research in supply chain trust should incorporate this
consideration.
The authors present a 2X2 matrix that has as its axes the two dimensions of trust where each dimension
is divided into two groups, adequate and outstanding. They discuss the relevance of each of thequadrants. Of key interest is the quadrant where both competence and goodwill trust are outstanding.
This scenario, the authors argue, is what is needed to achieve the breakthrough collaborative trust that sofew firms are able to achieve.
Trust signals are presented as actions that firms can take in order to increase trust in the relationship.These signals include: 1) performance to promise, professional relationships, openness, benevolent
collaboration and empathy. A survey of 189 firms is used to empirically assess the general areas of
strength and weakeness across these five signals. The authors confirm that collaborative trust remains
elusive and is best achieved when firms develop both dimensions of trust using all signals. The two
signals that set the top performers apart are benevolent collaboration and empathy.
This paper presents some important considerations for those engaged in supply chain trust research,
however the paper is not without some weakness. The paper does not pull from the rich knowledge basealready developed in sociology and economics on the role of trust in business relationships. It could bestrengthened by this theoretical exploration. Additionally, while descriptive statistics are provided on
the survey results, no correlation or covariance matrix is provided thus not enabling readers to study the
data for themselves.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://search.proquest.com/docview/749474395?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/749474395?accountid=130991http://search.proquest.com/docview/749474395?accountid=130991mailto:[email protected]7/31/2019 Trust Special Issue Final
12/12
ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF THE PURCHASING MANAG EMENT ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
1 D d St t W t PO B 64 S it 2704 T t O t i M5G 1Z3 T l 416 977 7566 F 416 977 4135
Title: Measuring trust in supply chain partners relationships
Journal: Measuring Business Excellence, 2010, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 53-69
Authors: Mohammed Laeequddin, B.S. Sahay, Vinita Sahay, K. Abdul Waheed
Key Words: trust; measurement; supply chain management, conceptual
http://search.proquest.com/docview/746317478?accountid=13099
Overview: This conceptual article proposes a methodology for analyzing trust based on a risk-
management framework. The papers key tenant is that trust is the assumption of acceptable risk and
where risk is not acceptable, trust should not exist. Where no risks exist, perfect trust can exist. Whererisk exists but is at an acceptable level (anticipate benefits exceed anticipated negative repercussions)
then the situation can be considered worthy of trust, or in the authors words, trust-worthy. Where
risk exceeds anticipated benefits, no trust should exist. The authors propose taking the multiple
categories of trust and scoring each from a scale of 1 10 and then categorizing them in the three
groupings just discussed.
A major strength of this paper is its review of the extant literature across various fields such as
psychology, sociology and economics. The authors provide over 40 unique definitions and statements
regarding trust including their respective citations. This is perhaps one of the best definitional surveyspublished on this topic. In addition to the definitional survey, the authors also provide a table that lists
12 different papers that measured trust and the exact measure used for those studies.
The analysis of trust through the lens of risk management is an interesting proposition and has merit of
consideration in future supply chain management research. The focus, however, that trust can be
quantified has its limitations. What the authors do not recognize is that very few, if any businessmanagers will actually sit down to run a calculation to determine whether or not they should trust a
supply chain partner. Behavioral economics has offered this same challenge to traditional economicsand the concept of bounded rationality and other behavioral considerations have an important place in
such a debate.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/746317478?accountid=13099http://search.proquest.com/docview/746317478?accountid=13099http://search.proquest.com/docview/746317478?accountid=13099Top Related