TOEFL iBT
TOEFL iBT
TOEFL
2.1
2006721Hong KongTOEFL iBT12016http://aoitani.net/TOEFL_iBT.html
CBTiBTPBTCBTiBT
TOEFL iBT
1990ETSTOEFLTOEFLTOEFLTOEFLTOEFLTOEFL
TOEFLTOEFLETS
TOEFL iBTTesting promotes learning.Test Preparation = Skill DevelopmentSupporting language learning through language assessmentRules of Grammar + Real Living Language = Communicative Competence for College/Graduate Students
We hope this will be our last version.
TOEFL CBTcomputer adaptiveETSComputer AdaptiveTOEFL CBTReadingcomputer adaptive
1TOEFLTOEIC990TOEFL CBT2701260TOEFL iBTTOEFL iBTTOEFL CBTCBTPBTiBTTOEFL1TOEFL iBT
Reading
Structure
Speaking
ListeningReading
Reading, Listening, Speaking, Writing
302TOEFL620iBT
TOEFL iBT
TOEFL
TOEFL iBTTOEFL
[TOEFL PBT]
TOEFLPaper-Based TestListening Comprehension, Structure/Written Expression, Reading Comprehension310677PBTWritingTest of Written EnglishTWE16TWETOEFL1980
[TOEFL CBT]
Computer-Based TestcomputerComputer-Based19987200010Listening, Structure, Reading, WritingWriting0300PBT310677Computer-adaptive testingReadingTOEFL iBT2006930
[TOEFL iBT]
Internet-Based TestReading, Listening, Speaking, WritingSpeakingTOEFLintegrated tasks
TOEFL
ITPInstitutional Testing ProgramTOEFLCBTiBTPBTTOEFL1102320062005TOEIC90%TOEIC
TOEFLTOEFL21996PBT498677
TOEFL512
TOEFL iBT22TOEFLTOEFLTOEFLTOEFL iBTTOEFL
10
Reading
3-512-14
20140212
60100
Listening
2-35
4-66
1223
6090
10
Speaking
Speaking2
ReadingListening4
20
Writing
1
Writing1
20
30
integrated questionsReadingListeningSpeakingWriting
30120
ReadingListeningETS
10102030
1. PassportIDhttp://ac.prometric-jp.com/toefl/jp/id.htmlRRCTEL:03-5541-4800ID
2. On-linecredit card
3. 34
TOEFLSan FranciscoAlamedastapler1001
Speaking1
SeattleTOEFL WorkshopSpeaking1
SeattleTOEFL WorkshopSpeaking1
SeattleTOEFL WorkshopSpeaking1
SeattleTOEFL WorkshopSpeaking1
Reading
700CBT250350
35
1214
60100
10A411/3121700
1. passage
2. routine
3. double checking
4. 121412summary2
2
ETSTOEFLDaniel Tumposky
Cloze Test
2030You cant even get to the first base.
TOEFL
TOEFL
Listening
4635500800
16
6090
12
23
2331225
15
fluencyautomaticityautomaticity
Speaking
Speaking
(1)
(2)
15
45
(3)
(4)
30
60
(5)
(6)
20
60
430
ETSSpeakingBritishAustralian2006127ETS
(1)fluencyautomaticity150
Delivery
Language UseHad it not been for ..
Topic DevelopmentETS
ETS
?
ETS61530Statistically, there is no difference between 28 and 30.2830It is very difficult to hide your fluency.rater
1545
(1)
I like France since it is an interesting country.I like France because I am learning French, and their food intrigues me so much. For example, .
45
15an itemized list
(1)
(2)
ETS
(3)(4)3060
(3)
751004045
6080150180
task
(4)
751006090150220
ETS
(5)(6)2060
(5)
6090180220
TA
ETS
(6)
6090
Using points and examples from the talk, explain ..
Speaking
AFSAccuracy, Fluency, SophisticationAmerican Field ServiceFluencyAutomaticityTOEFLSpeakingTOEFLFluencyAutomaticityReadingListeningTOEFL
TOEFLSpeakingListeningListening
1. CDCD
native speaker
2. sentenceVoice of AmericaSpecial English
3. Voice of AmericaSpecial English
linguistic chunksWriting
1.
2. http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/989563wt.pdfTOEFL CBT
3. Warm-UP Questions/Topics
4. TOEFLETSThe Official Guide to the New TOEFL iBT
Fluency and Automaticity
fluencyautomaticity
1. 3
2. 3.2.1Speaking(1)(2)3213.2.1.4.3.2.
3. 1545152154524515:45, 120, 45
4. 1245
Lets work on other problems for now.You are the first interpreter whose interpretation helped me understand the speaker, and not confuse me.45
Writing
150225
1
20
300
1
30
51030
TOEFL CBT
20072
ETSTOEFL iBTapostropheToms7Shift+7apostropheampersand&andTOEFL iBTapostrophe&
http://www.cieej.or.jp/toefl/toefl/ibt/img/pic_keyboard.pptapostropheTOEFL iBTETSTOEFL iBT
TOEFL CBT
Development
Organization
Language Use3Had it not been for ..Speaking
3230300
2230300
Summarize the points made in the lecture,Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.45
225
TOEFL CBT
http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/989563wt.pdf
1
http://www.jipta.net/html/naiyou.htm#2
TOEIC990TOEFLTOEFL CBT3002701260TOEFL
1
Total Score Comparisons
Score Comparisons
Internet-Based
Computer-Based
Paper-Based
120
120
119
118
117
116
114-115
113
111-112
110
109
106-108
105
103-104
101-102
100
98-99
96-97
94-95
92-93
90-91
88-89
86-87
84-85
83
81-82
79-80
77-78
76
74-75
72-73
300
297
293
290
287
283
280
277
273
270
267
263
260
257
253
250
247
243
240
237
233
230
227
223
220
217
213
210
207
203
200
677
673
670
667
660-663
657
650-653
647
640-643
637
630-633
623-627
617-620
613
607-610
600-603
597
590-593
587
580-583
577
570-573
567
563
557-560
553
550
547
540-543
537
533
Internet-Based
Computer-Based
Paper-Based
71
69-70
68
66-67
65
64
62-63
61
59-60
58
57
56
54-55
53
52
51
49-50
48
47
45-46
44
43
41-42
40
39
38
36-37
35
34
33
32
197
193
190
187
183
180
177
173
170
167
163
160
157
153
150
147
143
140
137
133
130
127
123
120
117
113
110
107
103
100
97
527-530
523
520
517
513
507-510
503
500
497
493
487-490
483
480
477
470-473
467
463
460
457
450-453
447
443
437-440
433
430
423-427
420
417
410-413
407
400-403
Score Comparisons, cont.
Internet-Based
Computer-Based
Paper-Based
30-31
29
28
26-27
25
24
23
22
21
19-20
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
93
90
87
83
80
77
73
70
67
63
60
57
53
50
47
43
40
37
33
30
27
23
20
17
13
10
7
3
0
397
390-393
387
380-383
377
370-373
363-367
357-360
353
347-350
340-343
333-337
330
323-327
317-320
313
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
2005 by Educational Testing Service
Range Comparison
Internet-Based
Computer-Based
Paper-Based
111-120
96-110
79-95
65-78
53-64
41-52
30-40
19-29
9-18
0-8
273-300
243-270
213-240
183-210
153-180
123-150
93-120
63-90
33-60
0-30
640-677
590-637
550-587
513-547
477-510
437-473
397-433
347-393
310-343
310
2
TOEFL CBT
Listening
S & W
Reading
Korea (DPR=)
4,600
18
18
19
184
Japan
81,749
18
19
20
188
Mongolia
287
20
18
18
188
Cambodia
112
19
19
19
191
Thailand
10,995
20
20
20
199
Afghanistan
228
20
21
19
202
Macau
403
19
21
20
202
Taiwan
27,000
19
21
21
202
Tajikistan
69
20
21
20
203
Vietnam
1,980
20
21
21
206
Korea (ROK)
86,188
20
21
22
209
Laos
35
21
21
21
211
Hong Kong
8,924
21
22
21
212
Indonesia
6,585
21
21
21
212
China, Peoples Republic of
24,075
20
22
22
213
Myanmar (Burma)
361
21
22
21
215
Turkmenistan
43
21
23
21
215
Bangladesh
2,395
21
23
22
218
Uzbekistan
429
22
22
22
218
Georgia
443
22
22
22
219
Nepal
3,272
21
23
21
219
Azerbaijan
228
22
22
22
221
Kyrgyzstan
178
22
22
22
222
Kazakhstan
650
22
23
22
224
Sri Lanka
1,463
23
23
22
224
Malaysia
2,626
23
23
22
226
Philippines
16,920
23
23
22
229
Pakistan
7,537
23
24
23
233
India
62,151
24
25
24
246
Singapore
387
25
26
25
254
Bhutan
20
*
*
*
*
Brunei Darussalam
6
*
*
*
*
Maldives
16
*
*
*
*
Hong Kongthe City University of Hong KongTOEFL iBT
TOEFL iBT
TOEFL CBTTOEIC
TOEFL CBT
TOEIC
Mailing List
EERR7,[email protected]
addressemailaddress
a.
b.
addressaddressescomputercomputerSingaporemachine
EQ \* jc2 \* "Font: " \* hps12 \o\ad(\s\up 11(),) Phone: 753-2568, Fax: 753-2509, URL: http://aoitani.net/
TOEFL
Test Of English as a Foreign Language. Pronounced like `toeful,' a word that, if it existed, would presumably mean replete with toe or toes. It would be an apt term to describe a mouth that had a foot stuck in it. TOEFL, as well the score a test-taker obtains on it, is much less informative. Administered by ETS. What did you expect?
Overall score, originally in the range 200 to 677, was 10 average of three section scores (20 to 68). They couldn't pick a system that didn't require roundoffs? No, they had to make it complicated. 660 is at the top percentile, top quartile is about 570, median is about 520. The graduate admissions office at Notre Dame interprets the range 535-600 as ``questionable ability.''
But wait! It gets worse. A computer-based test was introduced, with scores in the range 0 to 300. (Lowest score zero: what a clever innovation!) In order ``to avoid confusion'' (no thanks, really -- you've done enough), the scores on the paper-based test have been adjusted: scores between 200 and 310 on the old scale have been collaped up to 310 (fewer fine gradations between horrible and terrible). Since scores above 310 are not scaled, those higher scales still represent the same level of English incompetence they represented previously.
Some conversions:
Paper-based score Computer-based score
677 300
650 280
600 250
550 213
533 200
500 173
You could get a better idea of a student's English competence in a one-minute conversation, but that wouldn't be standardized. (Then again, see the FMSS entry.)
Y'know, the toeful/toefl thing reminds me: a way to distinguish many Austrian surnames from German ones is that if they end in a consonant followed by el where you would expect a consonant followed by ee followed by el in ordinary German spelling, then it's Austrian (z.B.: Vogl in sterreich; Vogel in Deutschland). This rule is a lot more accurate than the TOEFL's.
PAGE
7
Top Related