The TIMI TrialsThe TIMI Trials1984 - 19991984 - 1999
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
PART I. RESULTS OF TIMI 1 - TIMI 17PART II. TRIAL DESIGNS FOR TIMI 18-24
IV Heparin
Baseline Angio
Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI << 6 hours 6 hours
t-PA 80 mg / 3 hrs
Streptokinase1.5 MU / 60 mins
Angio 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 Mins
Double-blindDouble-blind
TIMI 1TIMI 1 Protocol Design
6270
3143
Reperfusion ofoccluded arteries
Patency at90 minutes
0
20
40
60
80
% o
f P
atie
nts
t-PA
SK
*P<0.001
**
TIMI Study Group N Engl J Med 1985;312:397- 401
TIMI 1TIMI 1 Primary Outcome
Comparison of t-PA and Streptokinase
TIMI 1TIMI 1Impact of 90 Minute Patency on Mortality
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
Weeks from Randomization
0
5
10
15
20
Mo
r tal
ity
(%)
Patent (N=161)
Occluded (N=128)
Open Artery Theory
Dalen, et. al. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62:179-85
TIMI Grade Flow Scoring System
Monitoring ReperfusionTIMI 1TIMI 1
TIMI 0 Complete occlusion
TIMI 1 Penetration of obstruction by contrast but no distal perfusion
TIMI 2 Perfusion of entire artery
but delayed flow
TIMI 3 Full perfusion, normal flow
10.6
7
4.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
TIMI 0/1 TIMI 2 TIMI 3
Flygenring BP et al. JACC 1991;17:275
Mortality at 42 Days
P < 0.005
IV t-PARandomize
6 week ETT / RVG
Immediate Invasive:Cath 2 hrs
N=195
Acute MI < 4 hours onset
Primary Endpoint:Pre-D/C EF
Follow-up 1 year
Delayed Invasive:
Cath 18-48 hrsN=194
Pre-D/C Angio and RVG
TIMI IIATIMI IIA Protocol Design
Conservative:Cath if +ETT or
ischemiaN=197
TIMI IIATIMI IIA Immediate PTCA vs. Delayed Invasive vs. Conservative Strategy post Thrombolysis
Management Strategy
TIMI IIA Invest. JAMA 1988;260:2849. Rogers, et al. Circulation 1990;81:1457-76
81 84 86
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 h 18 - 24 h Cons.
12.8
8.8
11.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2 h 18 - 24 h Cons.
Patency at Discharge (%) Death or MI by 6 weeks (%)
IV t-PAHeparin, ASA Randomize
Pre-D/C ETT / RVG
Acute MI < 4 hours onsetAcute MI < 4 hours onset
Conservative::Cath if +ETT or
ischemia
Primary Endpoint:Death or MI
Follow-up 1 year
Invasive:Cath 18-48 hrs
Revasc if feasible
6 week ETT / RVG
TIMI IIBTIMI IIB Protocol Design
TIMI Study Group. NEJM 1989;320:618. Williams DO, Circulation 1992;85:533-42.
PTCA or CABG to 1 Year
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 52
Weeks
0
20
40
60
80
% o
f P
ati e
nts
Invasive
Conservative
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 52
Weeks
0
5
10
15
20
% o
f P
ati e
nts
P=NS
15.2%14.7%
Conservative
Invasive
*P<0.001
Death or MI to 1 Year
72.2%
35.5%*
TIMI IIBTIMI IIBConservative vs. Delayed Invasive
Management Strategy
1000 Pts
370 Caths saved400 PTCAs saved
$3,200,000 saved
With no difference in outcomeWilliams DO, et al. Circulation
1992;85:533-42.
$3000 per Cath$4000 per PTCA
TIMI IIBTIMI IIBCost Implications of Invasive Strategy
Management Strategy
14.7
72.2
98
15.2
35.545.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
'Death/MI PTCA orCABG
Cath
Invasive Conservative
Roberts et al. Circulation 1991;83:422-37.
TIMI IIBTIMI IIBIV Beta-Blockade Following Thrombolysis
Adjunctive Therapy
4.5
2.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Late Beta-blocker
IV Beta-blocker
21.2
15.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Late Beta-blocker
IV Beta-blocker
Reinfarction (%) Recurrent Ischemia (%)
P = 0.02 P = 0.005
IV Heparin, (ASA), Beta-blockers, Nitrates, Ca++ blockers
Randomize
Angio 18-36 hrs
t-PA0.8 mg/kg over 90 mins
391 Patients with Unstable Angina / NQWMI391 Patients with Unstable Angina / NQWMI
Placebo
Primary Endpoint:Death, MI,Positive ETT 6 weeks Follow-up 6 weeks Circulation 1993;87:38-52
Baseline AngioAngio Exclusion: no CAD or LMain
TIMI IIIATIMI IIIA Protocol Design
Apparent thrombus35%
Possible thrombus30%
No thrombus35%
Improvement in Culprit Lesion: 25% t-PA vs. 19% placebo p=NS
TIMI IIIA Investigators. Circulation 1993;87:38-52.
TIMI IIIATIMI IIIAEffects of tPA on Coronary Lesions
Primary Results
BASELINE ANGIORAPHY:
ANGIORAPHY AFTER tPA:
ASA, IV Heparin, Beta-blockers, Nitrates, Ca++ blockers
Randomize
ETT 6 weeks
Early Invasive:Cath 18-48 h
PTCA/CABG prn
1473 Patients with Unstable Angina / NQWMI1473 Patients with Unstable Angina / NQWMI
Early Conservative:
ST Holter, ETT Thallium Cath/PTCA if +ischemia
1o Endpoint Inv-Cons:Death, MI,Positive ETT - 6 weeks
Follow-up 1 yearCirculation 1994;89:1545-56
2x2 Factorial:2x2 Factorial:t-PA vs. Placebot-PA vs. Placebo
1o Endpoint t-PA:Death, MI, Rec Isch,+ ETT, Thallium or ST Holter
TIMI IIIBTIMI IIIB Protocol Design
TIMI IIIB Investigators. Circulation 1994;89:1545-56
TIMI IIIBTIMI IIIB
tPA vs. Placebo in Non-ST Elevation ACSPrimary Results
54.2 55.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
tPA Placebo
8.8
6.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
tPA Placebo
0.55
00
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
tPA Placebo
Composite Endpoint Death or MI ICH
% o
f P
atie
nts
P = NS P = 0.05 P = 0.05
Events at 42dEvents at 42d InvasiveInvasive ConservativeConservative pp valuevalueNo. Pts 740 733Death (%) 2.4 2.5 NSMI (%) 5.1 5.7 NSD/MI/+ETT (%) 16.2 18.1 NS
Rehosp Angina (%) 7.8 14.1 <0.001D/MI/Rehosp (%) 15 22 0.007LOS (days) 10.2 10.9 <0.001# Days rehosp 365 930 <0.001
TIMI IIIB Investigators. Circulation 1994;89:1545-56
TIMI IIIBTIMI IIIB
Early Invasive vs. Conservative Strategy
Primary Results
• All consecutive patients admitted with unstable angina were screened.
• Inclusion Criteria: Ischemic pain >5 mins within 96 hrs with unstable pattern: At rest, accelerating, post MI
• Exclusion Criteria: Non-ischemic pain, ST elevation, admitted for revascularization procedure
• Patients in specific subgroups defined by gender, race and age were randomly selected for detailed evaluation and follow-up at 6 weeks and 1 year.
TIMI IIITIMI III RREGISTRYEGISTRY Protocol Design
2.6 3.6
11
0.8
6.6
22.9
1.63.7
6.8
1.63.7
8.2
In-Hospital 6 Weeks 1 Year0
5
10
15
20
25
% o
f P
ati e
nts
ST deviation >0.1 mV LBBB Tw change No ECG changes_
Stone PH, TIMI III Registry Study Group. JAMA 1996;275:1104-1112.Cannon CP et al for ECG Substudy Investigators. JACC 1997;30:133-40.
TIMI IIITIMI III RREGISTRYEGISTRY
Admission ECG as a prognostic indicator
Risk Stratification
Death or MI
Antman et al. NEJM 1996; 335:1342-9
0 1 2 3 4 5
No CKMB Elev
All Patients
No CKMB Elev
All Patients
No CKMB Elev
All Patients
Mortality at 42 Days (%)
TnI < 0.4 ng/mlTnI > 0.4 ng/ml
Enrolled 0-6 hrs
Enrolled 6-24 hrs
Enrolled 0-24 hrs
P<0.001
P <0.05
P <0.05
P<0.001
TIMI IIIBTIMI IIIBcTnI to Predict Risk of Mortality in ACS
Risk Stratification
Pt. with AMI < 6 hrs
Heparin, ASA
90 min Angio
18-36 hr AngioMIBI scan
RVG, MIBI scanFollow-up 6 wks, 1 yr
tPA Combination APSAC
TIMI 4TIMI 4 Protocol Design
Unsatisfactory Outcome One Year Mortality
Cannon CP, et al., TIMI 4 Investigators J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1602-10
0 30 60 90 120150180210240270300330 365
Days from Randomization
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Su
rviv
al
(% o
f P
ts)
t-PA
Comb.
APSAC
*p=0.07t-PA vs. APSAC
p=0.13t-PA vs. Comb.
TIMI 4TIMI 4Benefit of front-loaded tPA
Primary Results
42
52.456.7
0
20
40
60
80
tPA APSAC Comb.
% o
f P
atie
nts
*P = 0.06
*
Pt. with AMI < 6 hrsPt. with AMI < 6 hrs
Day 5-6: RVG, MIBI scan
4 Ascending Hirudin Doses:0.15 B, 0.05 IV0.1 B, 0.1 IV0.3 B, 0.1 IV0.6 B, 0.2 IV
5000 U Bolus,1000 U/h IVAPTT 65-90 secs
TIMI 5TIMI 5 Protocol Design
Heparin Hirudin
ASA, tPA
F/U 6 Weeks, 1 yr
90 min angio
18-36 hr angioMIBI Scan
6557
0
20
40
60
80
1.6
6.7
0
3
6
9
62
49
0
20
40
60
80
TIMI 5TIMI 5Hirudin vs. Heparin: Angiographic Results
Primary Results
Heparin N = 84
HirudinN = 162
Heparin N = 79
HirudinN = 157
Heparin N = 60
HirudinN = 123
TIMI 3 Flow at 90’TIMI 3 Flow at 90’ and 18-36 h
Reocclusion
Cannon CP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:993-1003.
Pt. with AMI < 6 hrs
Day 5-6: RVG, MIBI scan
3 Ascending Hirudin Doses:0.15 B, 0.05 IV0.3 B, 0.1 IV0.6 B, 0.2 IV
5000 U Bolus,1000 U/h IVAPTT 65-90 secs
TIMI 6TIMI 6 Protocol Design
Heparin Hirudin
ASA, SK
F/U 6 Weeks
TIMI 6TIMI 6Heparin vs. Hirudin and stability of APTT
Adjunctive Therapy
25
61.5
72.7 74.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Heparin 0.15/0.05 0.3/0.1 0.6/0.2
% o
f P
atie
nts
wit
h st
able
AP
TT
Hirudin Dose
Lee VL et al. for the TIMI 6 Investigators. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:7-13.
APTT range 30 seconds*p < 0.001
*
ASA
Randomize
30 Day Follow-up
Hirulog0.25 mg/kg/h
Patient with Unstable AnginaPatient with Unstable Angina
Hirulog0.5 mg/kg/h
Hirulog1.0 mg/kg/h
Hirulog0.02 mg/kg/h
TIMI 7TIMI 7 Protocol Design
TIMI 7TIMI 7Hirulog in Unstable Angina
Primary Results
10
12.5
3.2
5.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Hospital Discharge Six Weeks
Dea
th o
r M
I (%
Pat
ien
ts)
Low Dose (0.02 mg/kg/hr)
Higher Doses (0.25-1.0 mg/kg/hr)
Fuchs, Cannon for the TIMI 7 Investigators Circulation 92 : 727, 1995
P = 0.008
P = 0.009
UA/NQMI < 24 hrsUA/NQMI < 24 hrs
Primary EndpointPrimary Endpoint: Death or MI: Death or MI
ASAASA
HirulogHirulog
Followup: 30 daysFollowup: 30 days
HeparinHeparin ( (aPTT 50-70s)aPTT 50-70s)
TIMI 8TIMI 8 Protocol Design
Pt. with AMI Pt. with AMI << 12 hrs 12 hrsPt. with AMI Pt. with AMI << 12 hrs 12 hrs
Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)
Death, MI, Death, MI,
CHF/ShockCHF/Shock 30 days F/U30 days F/U
HEPARIN HEPARIN Bolus 5000 UBolus 5000 UInf 1000 U/hInf 1000 U/h
1300 u/h >80kg1300 u/h >80kg
HIRUDINHIRUDIN Bolus 0.6 Bolus 0.6
mg/kgmg/kg Inf 0.2 mg/kg/h Inf 0.2 mg/kg/h
Major BleedingMajor Bleeding
ASAASA
96 H Rx96 H Rx
aPTT 60-aPTT 60-90 s90 s
TIMI 9ATIMI 9A Protocol Design
Pt. with AMI < 12 hrsPt. with AMI < 12 hrsPt. with AMI < 12 hrsPt. with AMI < 12 hrs
Sample Size =3000 pts (Power 90%, Sample Size =3000 pts (Power 90%, .05, 25% Rx effect).05, 25% Rx effect)
Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)Thrombolytic Therapy (accel tPA or SK)
Death, MI, CHF/ShockDeath, MI, CHF/Shock 30 days30 days
HEPARIN HEPARIN Bolus 5000 UBolus 5000 UInf 1000 U/hInf 1000 U/h
HIRUDINHIRUDIN Bolus 0.1 Bolus 0.1
mg/kgmg/kg Inf 0.1 mg/kg/h Inf 0.1 mg/kg/h
Major BleedingMajor Bleeding
ASAASA
96 H Rx96 H Rx
aPTT 55-aPTT 55-85 s85 s
Protocol DesignTIMITIMI 9B9B
00 55 1010 1515 2020 2525 303000
22
44
66
88
1010
1212
1414
HIRUDINHIRUDIN
HEPARINHEPARIN
UNSATISFACTORY OUTCOMEUNSATISFACTORY OUTCOME
DEATH + REINFARCTIONDEATH + REINFARCTION
%%PtsPts
Days post randomizationDays post randomization
p=NSp=NS
12.912.9
11.911.9
9.79.7
9.59.5
TIMITIMI 9B9B
E. Antman for The TIMI 9B Investigators Circulation 1996;94: 911.
Primary ResultsHirudin vs. Heparin with tPA for MI
TIMI 9TIMI 9Influence of Heparin/Hirudin Dosing
Safety Observations
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Heparin Hirudin Heparin Hirudin
Per
cent
age
of P
atie
nts
Major Hemorrhage:InstrumentationSpontaneousICH
Antman et al. Circulation 1994 and 1996
Major Hemorrhage:
TIMI 9A (N=713) TIMI 9B (N = 2929)
65%
25%
10%
60%
31%
9%
Thrombolysis Non-reperfusion Primary PTCA
TIMI 9TIMI 9 RREGISTRYEGISTRY
Initial Management Strategy in AMI
Critical Pathways
All Patients Pts presenting 12 hrs
Cannon CP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;231-232A.
TIMITIMI 9B9B Risk Stratification
Prediction of Mortality at 30 Days
• Age > 70, • Prior MI• Anterior MI, • Atrial fibrillation• Rales• Hypotension and HR• Female gender • Diabetes
1.62.9
7.4
16
22.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1 2 3 >4Number Risk Factors
Mo
rtal
ity
- 30
Day
s (%
)
P<0.001
% Pts: 26% 37% 24% 10% 3%
Cannon CP et al. JACC 1999;33(Suppl. A):396A.
Hillis et al. TIMI 2
TIMI 10ATIMI 10A Protocol Design
TNK- tPA Bolus
ASA + IV Heparin
(APTT 55-85)
Follow-up Hosp. Discharge to 30 days
Pt. with Acute MI < 12hPt. with Acute MI < 12h
End Points:PharmacokineticsCoagulation parametersTIMI grade 3 flow at 90'TIMI frame countMajor hemorrhageAllergic Events
8 Ascending TNK-tPA Doses:5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg
Cannon CP et al. Circulation 1995;92:I-415.
TIMI 10ATIMI 10ATIMI Flow Grade at 90 Minutes
Primary Results
60
40
17
29
59 5764
80 40 66
42
2924
22
40
0
20
40
60
80
100
5 mg 7.5 mg 10 mg 15 mg 20 mg 30 mg 40 mg 50 mg
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
TIMI 3 TIMI 2
Cannon CP, TIMI 10A Investigators. Circulation 1997;95:351-6
TNK-tPA Dose
ASA, IV Heparin
Randomize
30 Day Follow-up
TNK-tPA 30mg
Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI < 12 hours Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI < 12 hours
TNK-tPA 40mg
TNK-tPA 50mg*
t-PA100 mg
Angio 60, 75, 90 Mins
*Stopped early*Stopped earlyReplaced with 40 mgReplaced with 40 mg
TIMI 10BTIMI 10B Protocol Design
TIMI 10BTIMI 10BTIMI Flow Grade at 90 Minutes
Primary Results
6355
63 66
1922 16
22
0
20
40
60
80
100
tPA TNK 30 mg TNK 40 mg TNK 50 mg
TIMI 3 TIMI 2
Cannon CP for the TIMI 10B Investigators. Circulation 1998;98:2805-14
*
77%77% 79%79%88%88%
82%82%
N = 311 304 146 76
ASA, IV Heparin
Randomize
30 Day Follow-up
TNK-tPA 30mg
Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI < 12 hours Patient with Acute ST Elevation MI < 12 hours
TNK-tPA 40mg
TNK-tPA 50mg*
*Stopped early*Stopped earlyReplaced with 40 mgReplaced with 40 mg
ASSENT IASSENT I Protocol Design
1.5
0.5
1.0
0 0 0
0.94
0.62
1.5
Total Stroke ICH Ischemic Stroke
% o
f P
atie
nts
30 mg TNK, n=1,705 40 mg TNK, n=1,457 50 mg TNK, n=73
ASSENT IASSENT I Primary ResultsIncidence of Stroke at 30 Days
Van de Werf F, Cannon CP for the ASSENT 1 Investigators Am Heart J 1999;137:786-91
2.8
2.11.8
0.80.71.1
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
TNK 30 tPA Either
% o
f P
atie
nts
Pre Post
p = 0.046
p = 0.4
p = 0.01
Giugliano RP, Circ 1997;96:I-535 (abstract)
TIMI 10B/ASSENT ITIMI 10B/ASSENT IICH Pre/post Reduction in Heparin
Adjunctive Therapy
Dose 2
N=309
Dose 1
N=320
IV BolusIV Bolus IV BolusIV Bolus Wgt AdjWgt AdjWgt AdjWgt Adj Fixed DoseFixed DoseFixed DoseFixed Dose
30 mg30 mg
30 mg30 mg
1.25 mg/kg1.25 mg/kg
Q 12 h (2-8d)Q 12 h (2-8d)
1.0 mg/kg1.0 mg/kg
Q 12 h (2-8d)Q 12 h (2-8d)
< 65 kg< 65 kg >> 65 kg 65 kg
40 mg40 mg 60 mg60 mg
Q12 hQ12 h
40 mg40 mg 60 mg60 mg
Q12 hQ12 h
Total Rx Period = 14 days
< 65 kg< 65 kg >> 65 kg 65 kg
Hospital Phase Home Rx
TIMI 11AProtocol Design
N=3211.25 mg/kg
Instrumented
Spontaneous
6.5%
1.9%
T3B Hep + Plac
N=735
3.2%
N=3091.0 mg/kg
0
2
4
6
8
10
Dose Tier 1 Dose Tier 2
%
TIMI 11 A Investigators. JACC 29: 1474,1997
TIMI 11APrimary Results
Incidence of Major Hemorrhage thru 14 days
p = 0.006
0.4%0.3%
5.8%5.6%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
All Patients Rapid cTnT Neg
p = 0.001
Mor
tali
ty a
t 1
4 D
ays
(%)
<1.55 mg/dL>=1.55 mg/dL
CRP Concentration
N = 437 N = 346
TIMI 11ARisk Stratification
Baseline C-reactive Protein and Mortality
Morrow et al. JACC 1998;31:1460-5
ENOXENOX Bolus 30 mg IVBolus 30 mg IV1.0 mg / kg Q12h1.0 mg / kg Q12h
Pt. with UA/NQMI Pt. with UA/NQMI << 24 h 24 h
Primary Endpoint:
UFH UFH >> 3 days 3 daysBolus 70 U / kgBolus 70 U / kg
INF 15 U / kg / hINF 15 U / kg / h
Major BleedingSerious AEs
ASAASA
aPTT 1.5-2.5 x aPTT 1.5-2.5 x controlcontrol
Hosp DC Hosp DC (or 8 days)(or 8 days)
TIMI 11BProtocol Design
Death, MI, Urgent Revascularization
Acute Phase Protocol
22
44
66
88
1010
1212
1414
1616
1818
2020
00 22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414
P=0.029RRR 15 %
UFHUFHENOXENOX 16.7 %16.7 %
14.2 %14.2 %%
Days
14.5 %14.5 %
12.4 %12.4 %
P=0.048RRR 15 %
TIMI 11BPrimary Results
Death/MI/Urgent Revascularization at 14 Days
E. Antman for The TIMI 11B Investigators Circulation 1999.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72
% P
ts
UFHUFHENOXENOX
5.2 %5.2 %
4.2 %4.2 % RRR 18%RRR 18%P=0.20P=0.20
7.3 %7.3 %
5.5 %5.5 %
RRR 24%RRR 24%P=0.02P=0.02
ESSENCEESSENCE
TIMI 11 BTIMI 11 B
Hours from Randomization
Efficacy ResultsDeath/MI/Urgent Revasc. Early Rx Phase
TIMI 11B
E. Antman for The TIMI 11B Investigators Circulation 1999.
Efficacy ResultsTIMI 11B
- ESSENCE Meta-Analysis- ESSENCE Meta-Analysis
OVERALL
ESSENCE
TIMI 11B
OVERALL
ESSENCE
TIMI 11B
OVERALL
ESSENCE
TIMI 11B
0.5 1 2
Day
8
14
43
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9Odds RatioEnox Better UFH Better
OR % p
0.77(0.62-0.95)
23 0.02
0.79(0.65-0.96)
21 0.02
0.82(0.69-0.97)
18 0.02
N
7081
7081
7081
3910
3910
3910
3171
3171
3171
UFH(%)
Enox (%)
5.3 4.1
6.5 5.2
8.6 7.1
Death/MI
Antman E, Cohen M for The TIMI 11B & ESSENCE Investigators Circulation 1999.
Pt. with UA/NQMI < 24 h
Death, MI, Severe Rec Isch Requiring Urgent Revasc
Acute = Day 8UFH iv > 72 hUFH iv > 72 h
Major Bleeding Serious AEs
ASA
ENOX iv-b,scENOX iv-b,sc
Placebo scPlacebo sc ENOX scENOX sc Chronic = Day 43
TIMI 11BProtocol Design
DaysDays
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44
P=0.048P=0.048RRR 12 %RRR 12 %
UFHUFHENOXENOX
19.7 %19.7 %
17.3 %17.3 %
%%
TIMI 11BPrimary Results: Chronic Phase
Death/MI/Urgent Revascularization at 43 Days
E. Antman for The TIMI 11B Investigators Circulation 1999.
TIMI 11BEfficacy Results
Efficacy of Enoxaparin Stratified by Baseline Risk
0.5 1 2
High(N=593)
Inter(N=1645)
Low(N=1672)
UFH(%)
ENOX(%)
OR (95 CI)
Favors ENOX
Favors UFHO.R.
29.6 0.78 (0.55,1.13)24.8
20.5 17.9
15.0 14.1
0.85 (0.66,1.08)
0.94 (0.72,1.23)
22
15
6
%
P=0.079 trend
Day 43 Death/MI/UR at 43 DaysDeath/MI/UR at 43 Days
Holper E. AHA 1998
TIMI 11BEfficacy Results
Efficacy of Enoxaparin Stratified by Rx Strategy
6.17.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
UFH ENOX
%
8.8
7
0
2
4
6
8
10
UFH ENOX
7.6 7.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
UFH ENOX
Med Rx
Guzman ESC 1999
PCI CABG
OR (95 CI) 0.85 (0.62,1.16) 0.77 (0.45,1.31) 1.04 (0.55,1.95)
1286 265 275 396 3741314
D/MI/UR
15 pts/dose
1o End Point:
% Inhibition of ADP-induced Plt aggregation
Plt. Aggreg. / PK samples0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 24, 36 h
Follow-up visit Day 7Phone Contact Day 14, 21
Sibrafiban3 mg bid
Sibrafiban5 mg qd
Sibrafiban5 mg bid
Sibrafiban10 mg qd
Additional Doses:7 mg bid15 mg qd10 mg bid
Plt. Aggreg. / PK samples0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 24 h
Cannon et al. Circulation 1998;97:340
Protocol DesignTIMI 12TIMI 12
Patients 1-7 days post-ACS
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 20 40 60 80 100
Peak % Inhibition of ADP-induced Aggregation (Day 1)
3 mg bid
5 mg bid
10 mg bid
7 mg bid
Minor or Major Bleeding (% of Pts)
R2=0.95
Cannon CP et al Circulation 1998;97:340-9
Primary ResultsTIMI 12TIMI 12 Platelet Inhibition and Bleeding Risk
3 mg bid3 mg bid5 mg bid5 mg bid7 mg bid7 mg bid10 mg bid10 mg bid
00
2525
5050
7575
100100
00 66 1212 2424
Mea
n %
in
hib
itio
n (
AD
P)
Mea
n %
in
hib
itio
n (
AD
P)
00 66 1212 2424 3636
D1D1 D28D28
Hours post-doseHours post-doseCannon et al. Circulation 1998;97:340
Primary ResultsTIMI 12TIMI 12 Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation by Dose Grp
ST , lytic eligible, < 12 h
Group I
tPA < 100 mg
Group II
dose tPA
Group III
dose SK
Group IV
No lytic
Angio (90 min) , In Hospital Events, 30 day F/U
No Abciximab Abx: bolus 0.25 mg/kg inf 0.125 g/kg/min x 12 h
STD Heparin (70 U/kg ; 15 U/kg/h)
Low Dose Heparin (60 U/kg ; 7 U/kg/h)
ASA
TIMI 14
vs
Group V
rPA 10+10U
Group VI
dose rPAvs
4540
5863
5749
62
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
100 mg bolus bolus + 30 mininfusion
bolus + 60 mininfusion
% o
f P
atie
nts
60 Min 90 Min
TIMI 14Primary Results
Speed and Extent of Thrombolysis: TIMI 3 Flow
Antman et al. Circulation 1999;99:2720
tPAtPA tPA + AbciximabtPA + Abciximab 2 Trend, p < 0.0022 Trend, p < 0.002
Normal Normal Flow Flow
cTFC < 28cTFC < 28
tPA 100 mg 36tPA 100 mg 36
tPA 50 (15b/35inf) + Abx tPA 50 (15b/35inf) + Abx 2828
Abx 100Abx 100
SK + Abx 45SK + Abx 45
cTFCcTFC Median Median
P=0.005P=0.005
%
Pat
ien
ts%
Pat
ien
ts
0101020203030404050506060707080809090
100100
0Corrected TIMI Frame Count
20 40 60 80 100
TIMI 14Efficacy Results
TIMI Frame Count at 90 Min
Antman et al. Circulation 1999;99:2720
ControlFull Dose Lytic:rPA 10 + 10 U
Reduced Dose Lytic
rPA
Angio (90 min) , In Hospital Events, 30 day F/U
No Abciximab Abx : bolus 0.25 mg/kg inf 0.125 g/kg/min x 12 h
Low Dose Heparin (60 U/kg ; 7 U/kg/h)
Very Low Dose Heparin (30 U/kg ; 4 U/kg/h)
ST Elevation, Lytic Eligible, < 12 hASA
No Abciximab
STD Heparin (70 U/kg ; 15 U/kg/h)
TIMI 14Protocol Design- rPA Phase - rPA Phase
TIMI 14Risk Stratification
ST Resolution and Mortality in Patients with Patent IRA
0.5
4.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6M
ort
alit
y (%
)
STRES 70% STRES < 70%
P = 0.01
de Lemos et al for the TIMI 14 Investigators. Am J Cardiol, 1999
TIMI 14Risk Stratification
ST Resolution and TIMI Flow Grade
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% o
f P
atie
nts
TIMI 0/1TIMI 2TIMI 3
TIMI 3 Flow: p < 0.001 for trendTIMI 3 Flow: p < 0.001 for trend
STRES STRES 30% 30% STRES 30-70%STRES 30-70% STRES STRES 70% 70%
de Lemos et al for the TIMI 14 Investigators. Am J Cardiol, 1999
TIMI 14Treatment Effects
Effect of Abciximab on ST Resolution
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
tPA Comb tPA Comb tPA Comb
% o
f P
ati
en
ts
> 70%30 - 70%< 30%
All PatientsAll Patients Patent IRAPatent IRA TIMI 3 FlowTIMI 3 Flow
P < 0.001P < 0.001 P < 0.001P < 0.001 P < 0.001P < 0.001
N 125 221 102 191 80 151
de Lemos et al for the TIMI 14 Investigators. Circulation, 1999
45/0.645/0.6 60/0.860/0.8
ACS within 0-48hACS within 0-48h
30/0.430/0.4
AspirinAspirinHeparin (opt)Heparin (opt)
OtherOtherDosesDoses 60/0.560/0.5 75/0.275/0.2 75/0.475/0.4 90/0.290/0.2100/0.5100/0.5120/0.4120/0.4
Bolus/Infusion (g/kg) (g/kg/m)
for 24-96 h PK/PD at 0, 20m, 1-4hPK/PD at 0, 20m, 1-4hQD, pre-stop, 2-4h &QD, pre-stop, 2-4h &
8-24h post stop8-24h post stop
Clinical f/u at 14dClinical f/u at 14d
Protocol DesignTIMI 15ATIMI 15A
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1-4h 24h 48-96h Pre-stop 2-4h post 8-16hpost
17-24hpost
% IP
A
0.80 ug/kg/min : N=13
0.60 ug/kg/min : N=12
0.50 ug/kg/min : N=20
0.40 ug/kg/min : N=34
0.20 ug/kg/min : N=10
Only 1 specimen for each pt 8-24h post drugOnly 1 specimen for each pt 8-24h post drug
Primary ResultsTIMI 15ATIMI 15AMean Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation
Giugliano ACC 1998
TIMI 15B Protocol DesignIV Oral IIb/IIIa Inibitor in ACS
Unstable Anginaor non-STE-MI
(0 - 72 hrs)
Klerval 175 BIDpo x 4wks
Klerval 200 BIDpo x 4 wks
Klerval 150 TIDpo x 4 wks
IV Klerval 100 ug/kg bolus0.50 ug/kg/min infusion
for 24-96 hrs
Placebo BIDpo x 4 wks
Placebo TIDpo x 4 wks
IV PlaceboBolus + infusion
for 24-96 h
RANDOMIZE
AspirinPanel 1: Heparin (opt)
Panel 2: Enoxaparin
STE-MI(no lytic)(0 - 72 hrs)
STE-MI(with lytic)
(6-72 hrs)
ASA 150-162 mg daily
Patient with Unstable Coronary Syndrome <72 hours
OrbofibanOrbofiban50 mg BID50 mg BID
Orbo 50 mg BID x 30 daysOrbo 50 mg BID x 30 daysthen Orbo 30 mg BIDthen Orbo 30 mg BID
Placebo Placebo BIDBID
IV heparin, other med, Cath, PTCR, and CABG at the discretion of the treating physician
Follow-up visits Day 14, Day 30
Follow-up visit every 3 months
Primary endpoint through follow-up
(Avg. 1 yr, min. 6 mos)
Randomize 1:1:1
Protocol Design
No. PtsNo. Pts
Composite
(%)
Death
MI
Urg revasc
Rehosp
Stroke
PlaceboPlacebo
20.3
3.1
5.5
8.0
11.3
0.9
Orbo Orbo
50/30*50/30*
20.2
4.4
5.1
6.1
12.1
1.1
OrboOrbo
50/5050/50
20.1
4.1
5.4
6.1
11.2
1.1
P valuesP valuesEach Dose Each Dose vs. Placebovs. Placebo
Data as of Jun 10 1999
NS
0.002 / 0.03
NS
0.001 / 0.003
NS
NS
*Orbofiban 50mg bid x 30 days, then 30mg bid
Primary ResultsClinical Events Through 300 Days
Time (days)0 50 100 150 200 250 300
05
10
15
20
25
30 % Patients with primary endpoint
placebo50-30 mg50-50 mg
F/U pl v. 50-30: p=0.14pl v. 50-50: p=0.02
30d pl v. 50-30: p=0.73pl v. 50-50: p=0.08
Data as of Jun 10 1999
Primary ResultsPatients PCI on Study Drug
Cannon et al. AHA 1999
00
2525
5050
7575
100100
00 6h6h 12h12h 24h24h
% i
nh
ibit
ion
(A
DP
)%
in
hib
itio
n (
AD
P)
36h36h
IV infusion:IV infusion:(Eptifibatide 180 ug/kg (Eptifibatide 180 ug/kg
+ 2.0 ug/kg/min)+ 2.0 ug/kg/min)(mean +/- Std. Dev) (mean +/- Std. Dev)
N=48N=48
IntravenousIntravenous OralOral
Data on File, COR/Key Ferguson et al JACC 1998;31:185A (abstract)
00
5050
100100
0h0h 6h6h 0h 0h 6h 6h
8080
Oral :Oral :(Orbofiban (Orbofiban 50 mg BID)50 mg BID)
= Mean= Mean
PharmacodynamicsIV vs. Oral GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Orbofiban: minimal benefit with small excess in mortality
Major bleeding (3.5%) and thrombocytopenia (0.6%) rates higher than placebo (2%, 0%) but acceptable
Need to optimize dosing strategy of oral IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Peaks/troughs in % inhibition seen
Low blood levels at trough -> ? Proaggregatory effects
High blood levels in some Pts -> ? increased events
30% benefit in PCI patients on study drug
Other trials ongoing with other agents + trial designs
Clinical Implications
ST Elev MI ST Elev MI << 6 h 6 h
Primary EndpointPrimary Endpoint: All Cause Mortality (30 days): All Cause Mortality (30 days)
ASA
accel tPAaccel tPA<< 100 mg/90 min 100 mg/90 min
Heparin (aPTT 50-70s)
2 : 1lanoteplase lanoteplase 120 KU/kg120 KU/kg
Followup: 30 days, 6 months, 12 monthsFollowup: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months
Protocol Design
Time (days)
% P
ati
ents
02
46
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
nPA
tPA
24hr Mortality
tPA: 2.49%
nPA: 2.39%
30 Day Mortality
tPA: 6.60%
nPA: 6.77%
Primary ResultsLanoteplase vs tPA: 30 Day Mortality
Neuhaus KL. ACC 1999
N = 15, 078
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5nPA Better tPA Better
Relative Risk & 95% CI for 30 day event rates
Severe CHF
Recurrent MI
Urgent Revasc (in-hosp)
Death + MI
Death + MI + Severe CHF
Death + MI + Severe HF+ non-fatal stroke
Efficacy ResultsLanoteplase vs tPA: Secondary Endpoints
Neuhaus KL. ACC 1999
2.4%
6.7%
3.0%
7.3%
2.7%
10.1%
1.8%
5.6%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
24 Hours 30 Days
% p
atie
nts
West. EuropeEast. EuropeLatin AmericaNorth America
8882 2894 407 2873 8882 2894 407 2873N
Giugliano R. EHJ 1999;20:519 (abstract)
Practice PatternsMortality by Geographic Region
24 Hours 30 Days
37.040.0
24.021.0 20.0
17.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
In-hosp 30 Day
% o
f P
ati
en
ts
24h cath Day cath No cath
P < 0.0001P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001P < 0.0001
Llevadot J. EHJ 1999;20:356 (abstract)
Practice PatternsRevascularization Rates & Cath Lab Availability
In-HospitalIn-Hospital 30 Day30 Day
10.6
6.3 6.6
11.4
7.0
11.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
All cause Death Death + MI
% o
f P
atie
nts
24h cath Day cath No cath
P = NSP = NS
P = NSP = NS
Llevadot J. EHJ 1999;20:356 (abstract)
Practice PatternsDeath/MI at 30 Days and Cath Lab Availability
All Cause MortalityAll Cause Mortality Death or MIDeath or MI
Top Related