Download - The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Transcript
Page 1: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The Star of Bethlehem The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Storyand the Christmas Story

Myth, Fact and RealityMyth, Fact and Reality

Page 2: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Fact and fiction I

• The New Testament is a mixture of history, hearsay and preaching written some 90 years after the Nativity.– Matthew about 80-100 AD

– Luke about 80-130AD

• It is not strictly a historical record, but it is undoubtedly based on something that was at least intended to be a more or less factual account.– We are not dealing with pure fantasy.We are not dealing with pure fantasy.

– It cannot be taken too literally, but no one can argue that It cannot be taken too literally, but no one can argue that the Gospel narrative has no basis of historical fact.the Gospel narrative has no basis of historical fact.

Sources differ widely about the exact dates.

Page 3: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

[1] Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,[2] Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.[3] When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.[4] And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.[5] And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,[6] And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.[7] Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, inquired of them diligently what time the star appeared.[8] And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also.[9] When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.[10] When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.[11] And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.[12] And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.[13] And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.[14] When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt:[15] And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.[16] Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men.

Matthew’s Version of the Nativity

Page 4: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

[1] And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.[2] (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)[3] And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.[4] And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)[5] To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.[6] And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.[7] And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.[8] And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.[9] And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.[10] And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.[11] For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.[12] And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.[13] And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,[14] Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.[15] And it came to pass, as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us.[16] And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger.

Luke’s Version of the Nativity

Page 5: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Differences between Matthew and Luke

• Matthew:– The Star

– The Magi

– King Herod

– A house

• Luke:– The census

– Caesar Augustus

– Quirinius (Cyrenius)

– The inn

– The shepherdsA cynic would say that it is hard to believe that Matthew and A cynic would say that it is hard to believe that Matthew and

Luke are describing the same event.Luke are describing the same event.

However, it is likely that they were interested in different However, it is likely that they were interested in different aspects of the Nativity and wrote for a different audience:aspects of the Nativity and wrote for a different audience:

• Matthew… an evangelist.Matthew… an evangelist.

• Luke… probably a doctor and an amateur historian.Luke… probably a doctor and an amateur historian.

Page 6: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Differences between Matthew and Luke

• Matthew:– Jesus as a young child

– A house: permanent accommodation

• Luke:– Baby Jesus

– The stable: temporary emergency accommodation.

Luke seems to be describing events immediately around the Luke seems to be describing events immediately around the birth of Jesus.birth of Jesus.

Matthew is talking of events weeks or months later.Matthew is talking of events weeks or months later.

Page 7: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

[1] Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,[2] Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the eastwe have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.[3] When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.

[7] Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, inquired of them diligently what time what time the star appearedthe star appeared.[8] And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also.[9] When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child waswent before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.[10] When they saw the starWhen they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.[11] And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.

[16] Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men.

Matthew’s Version of the Star

Page 8: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Explaining the Star

• There are three generic explanations

1. It was a miraculous event• Science plays no part in the explanation

2. It never existed• Matthew simply added the Star to his account. End of

story.

3. It was a natural event of some kind.• Science can explain it.

Here explanation “3” is assumed. Otherwise this Here explanation “3” is assumed. Otherwise this would be a very short talk.would be a very short talk.

Page 9: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The oldest mystery in astronomy?

• What was the Star mentioned by Matthew?– We can only deal with

probabilities, never certainty…

– Sadly, it is vanishingly unlikely that any completely new information about the Star will ever come to light.

– But absence of proof is not But absence of proof is not proof of absence!proof of absence!

Matthew’s Gospel – French illuminated bible, c. 1250-1260

Page 10: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

A Popular Misconception

• It is not truenot true that the Star is only mentioned in Matthew.– The Star The Star is mentionedis mentioned in other contemporary documents. in other contemporary documents.– The Apocryphal Gospel of JamesApocryphal Gospel of James (purportedly written as an

eye-witness account) mentions the Star in somewhat more detail than Matthew, but this book was not incorporated into the “official” version of the Bible around the 3rd Century.

– The Star was also mentioned in a letter by Ignatius to the Ephesians written after Matthew, but about 2 centuries before the New Testament was compiled.

• Both Matthew and James apparently used an earlier, lost text “Q” as the source of their accounts.

Page 11: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Fact and fiction II

• The New Testament has at least some basis of historical fact.

• Many of the personalities and places associated with the Nativity genuinely existed at the time of the Nativity and are known about in some detail.

• For example…

Page 12: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Known historical facts

• Bethlehem – shepherds still graze their flocks on the hills around the town (as in this photograph).

Page 13: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Known historical facts

• King Herod – was the last ruler of a united Judea under the Romans, before the Kingdom was divided in three on his death.

Page 14: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Known historical facts

• Jerusalem – much of Jerusalem is little changed. The sites of such monuments as the Temple and Herod’s Palace are well known.

Page 15: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Known historical facts

• Emperor Caesar Augustus – was emperor at the time of the Nativity and ordered global censuses in 28BC, 8BC and 14AD.

Page 16: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Known historical facts

• Quirinius – is thought to have spent

two periods in the region and was charged by Caesar Augustus with carrying out a census.

– The tablet shows the results for a census in Lebanon organised at an unknown date by Quirinius (described as “Emperor’s LegateEmperor’s Legate”, not “Governor”).

Page 17: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The date problem• Luke’s Gospel is problematic:

– Quirinius was Governor of Syria in 6-7AD.

– Herod died 9 years earlier, so Quirinius could not have been Governor while Herod was alive.

– There was no global census at the time that Quirinius was Governor.

• Most experts believe that the census mentioned by Luke was that of 8BC.

• But this creates even more problems: Judea was a Protectorate, not part of the Empire. Joseph would not have been bound to participate in the census.

• It was not until 14AD that Rome took over Judea. Only the 14AD census decree would have applied to Judea.

Page 18: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

We three Kings?

• Matthew does not state that the Magi were kings, nor does he state that there were three of them.– People associate the three

(symbolic) gifts with three Magi.

– Matthew simply uses the plural to describe them.

– In the oldest representations sometimes they were two, sometimes four and, in the Orthodox tradition, twelve.

Page 19: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

We three Kings?

• The Magi were not always kings.

• It was the church that elevated the Magi to royalty in the 6th Century AD.– It was a political decision.

– The “King of kings” must have been visited by kings.

Page 20: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

We three Kings?

• The names – Melchior, Baltasar and Gaspar – are even more recent.

• They date from the 8th Century, but were not commonly used until the 10th Century.

• The names symbolise the three races of Earth – African, Asian and European.

Page 21: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Who were the Magi?

• Magi– A sect of Zoroastrian

priests among the Medes in Persia were known as the MagiMagi.

– Zoroastrianism made Messianic prophesies similar to those of the Jews.

– The Magi were most probably from northern Persia, close to the Caspian Sea.

Page 22: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The Magi and the Persian Horde

• In 614AD the Persian armies invaded and sacked northern Italy.

• In Ravenna, the church of San Vitale was spared because the Persian horde saw the images on the walls of the Magi in Persian dress and treated them as their own sacred religious symbols.

• The oldest images of the Magi often depict them as Persians.

Page 23: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The real Magi?

• In the 13th Century Marco Polo carried out his legendary voyage to Cathay...

Page 24: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The real Magi

• In the small town of Saveh in northern Persia the natives assured him that this had been the home town of the Magi and from where they had seen the Star.

Page 25: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

An odd “coincidence”?

• Why should the 13th Century inhabitants of this tiny and unknown town, half way to China, regale Marco Polo with tales of events that never happened and, what is more, events in a country more than 1500km away, with which they had no obvious affinity?

Page 26: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

When was the Nativity?

• The date of the Nativity was set in 525AD by the Scythian monk Dionisius Exiguus.

• His choice was not arbitrary, but we know that the date given by Dionisius was almost certainly not the correct one.

Page 27: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

A historical fact

• Historians and biblical scholars agree that King Herod died in late March or early April 4BC, shortly after a partial lunar eclipse observed from Jericho.

• Thus the Nativity occurred before 4BC, probably not long before his death.

Herod family tombHerod family tomb

Page 28: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

More odd “coincidences”

• It is well known that when Dionysius Exiguus established the Christian calendar in the 6th Century, he committed two “errors”:– He did not include a year zero (the Romans did not use

the number zero!); the calendar jumps directly from 1BC to 1AD and the Nativity was on December 25th 1AD.

– He forgot to factor in the 4 years during which Augustus Caesar ruled under his given name of Octavian.

• In the corrected Dionysian calendar the Nativity In the corrected Dionysian calendar the Nativity happened happened in 5BCin 5BC, , one year before Herod’s one year before Herod’s unlamented deathunlamented death..

Page 29: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Coincidence or design?

• Is it just a coincidence that the revised Dionisian calendar gives a year for the Nativity consistent with the known date of the death of Herod?

• Critics suggest that maybe Dionisius committed more errors and that the Nativity really happened even earlier, perhaps in 6 or 7BC.– This has been used to support some theories of the Star of

Bethlehem.

– But, nobody has ever suggested what those errors may But, nobody has ever suggested what those errors may have been.have been.

Page 30: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The First Christmas

• Why do we celebrate Christmas on December 25th?

• It is quite certain that the Nativity did not happen on December 25th.

Page 31: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The clue of the shepherds

• Why would the shepherds be watching their flocks at night?– The hills around Bethlehem

reach altitudes up to almost 800m.

– In winter the animals would usually be under cover, especially in bad weather.

Page 32: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The clue of the shepherds• The weather in Bethlehem in

December, January and February is cold and humid. Only a shepherd who wanted to risk pneumonia would sleep in the open.– It starts to improve in March when the

shepherds would start to sleep out with their flocks.

– At lambing time (March-April) they would have needed to keep watch intensely by night to help ewes in distress.

– If there were large predators (e.g. wolves) they would sleep with their flocks, from March to September.

Page 33: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Why then December?

• Sol Invictus was the most important festivity in Rome.

• It marked the shortest day.

• It had been celebrated by the Celts from at least 1000BC.

• Rather than abolish a popular holiday, the early Christian church adopted it and adapted it as their own second most important celebration.

Page 34: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Why then December?

• The Roman celebrations of Sol Invictus were marked by:– The most important public

holiday of the year.

– Parades in the streets.

– Giving and receiving of gifts.

– Special meals and feasts.

– Decorating houses with green bows.

• Does this sound familiar???

Page 35: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The true date of the Nativity

• Other contextual clues (e.g. the inn being full) suggest that the Nativity occurred at a “special” time of year, with many people in transit.

• Passover – Like lambing time, in March or April according to the year – fits the bill.

There are good contextual and historical reasons to believe that the There are good contextual and historical reasons to believe that the Nativity Nativity maymay have occurred in March or April 5BC. have occurred in March or April 5BC.

Page 36: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Consequences?

1.1. The entire basis of our The entire basis of our western calendar is western calendar is wrongwrong (the millennium was not 2001 but, in fact, 1996).

2. Christmas should be around Easter.

3. If we are looking for a Star of Bethlehem it had to appear no later than 5BC.

Where did I go Where did I go wrong???wrong???

Page 37: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Popular (wrong) theories

• Venus– Visible low in the

dawn sky this Christmas and in the evening sky in 2007.

– The oldest known observations are of Venus.

– If the Wise Men were fooled by Venus they could not have been very wise.

Page 38: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Popular (wrong) theories

– Appeared in 12BC and was extensively observed by the Chinese.

– If this was the Star of Bethlehem the Magi were obviously in no hurry to get to Bethlehem.

Page 39: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Popular (wrong) theories

• A conjunction– There are about 10

conjunctions of bright planets each year.

– The most spectacular around the Nativity was in 2BC.

– The Magi either used a time machine, or earned huge quantities of “Frequent Camel-rider Miles”.

Page 40: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Popular (wrong) theories

• A meteor– Can be very bright,

impressive and move in the sky.

– But, typically only visible 1-2 seconds.

– Did the Magi have rocket-propelled camels?

Page 41: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Popular (wrong) theoriesPopular (wrong) theories

• Don’t even Don’t even THINK it!THINK it!

Page 42: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Ancient chronicles: Babylon• Ancient chronicles have been

carefully scrutinised to see what celestial phenomena were recorded that may have been the Star.

• However there are few known records.

• Tablet BM014BM014 in the British Museum is a Babylonian observing log from 7BC.

• It describes, in the driest language, the triple conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in 7BC and the planetary massing of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn in February 6BC.

Page 43: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

• This was not a spectacular This was not a spectacular event. The two planets event. The two planets barely got within 1º of each barely got within 1º of each other.other.

• Triple conjunctions are Triple conjunctions are rare: only 7 happened in rare: only 7 happened in the last millennium BC.the last millennium BC.

• Like those of 980/979 & Like those of 980/979 & 861/860BC it took place in 861/860BC it took place in Pisces, a constellation often Pisces, a constellation often associated with the Jews.associated with the Jews.

Page 44: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Ancient chronicles: China and Korea

• Nor are there many oriental records from this epoch.

• Between 20BC and 1BC there are just 4 catalogued events.– 12BC– 10BC– 5BC– 4BC

Page 45: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Ancient chronicles: China and Korea

• The 12BC event is known to be Halley.

• The 10BC event is a “ghost event” – another observation of Halley with the wrong year.

• The 5 & 4BC events are interesting but, for years, caused confusion.

Page 46: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Oriental answers: China

The “Ch'ien-han-shu” states: 

"In the second year of the period of Ch'ien-p'ing, second month, a hui-hsing appeared in Ch'ien-niu for more than 70 days"

This can be translated as:

“During the interval between March 10th and April 7th of 5 BC, a comet that was visible for more than 70 days appeared close to Alpha and Beta Capricornii”

• The chronicle gives a fixed position over two and a half months, not reasonable if the object really was a comet. The Chinese though often used “hui-hsing” to describe bright novae such as Tycho’s Star.

• May is monsoon season in China so bad weather would almost certainly have curtailed further observations – the Star was almost certainly visible for longer, hence the phrase “more than 70 days”. 

Page 47: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

• It starts first and is It starts first and is worst in the south.worst in the south.

• From May From May 50% of 50% of days are rainy in days are rainy in Hong Kong.Hong Kong.

• Observations of the Observations of the sky would have been sky would have been almost impossible.almost impossible.

Page 48: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Oriental answers: Korea

A second record is found in the Korean “History of Three Kingdoms- the Chronicle of Silla (Samguk Sagi)”

“Year 54 of Hyokkose Wang, second month, (day) Chi-yu, a po-hsing

appeared in Ho-Ku”

As the date given was inexistent, like February 30th, it is believed that "Chi-yu" really should be "I-yu", a character written in an almost identical fashion in Chinese and easily confused with it.

If so, this can be translated as:

“On March 31st of 4 BC a bushy star appeared close to Altair”

Page 49: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Oriental answers?

Another remarkable “coincidence”:Another remarkable “coincidence”:

Either two separate, notable objects appeared at the same time of the year to the south of Aquila in consecutive years or, more probably, a single, bright nova appeared to the north of the star

Capricornii in March 5BC.

This is exactly the most probable date of the Nativity.This is exactly the most probable date of the Nativity.

Page 50: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Ho-Ku & Ch’ien-Nu

• Ho-Ku is Altair and some fainter stars in southern Aquila.

• Ch’ien-Niu is an area of faint stars in northern Capricorn.

• Some authors make much of this disagreement.

Page 51: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The Ho-Ku date clue

• But, on the date given by the Koreans (March 31st), the nova would have been in conjunction with the waning gibbous moon.

• Only the brightest stars in the region, such as Altair, would have remained visible, hence the position given.

• Probably the Koreans elected this reference date deliberately.

Page 52: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Ko-hsing confusion• The Chinese had a word “Ko-

hsing” (Guest Star) for novae.

• But it was not consistently used.– Bright novae and supernovae,

including Tycho’s Star, were often described as comets.

• European astronomers tended to do the same.– Tycho Brahe said, on first

seeing the supernova “I am I am sure that yesterday this comet sure that yesterday this comet was not in the skywas not in the sky”.

Page 53: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Why a nova and not a comet?• A “new star” would symbolise a

birth.– The Chinese star did not move in the

sky.– It appeared in the Milky Way where

almost all novae appear.

• Comets have been almost universally regarded as bad omens.– Comets were associated with deaths,

not with births.– An apparition of Halley’s Comet

was said (correctly!) to foretell the fall of Jerusalem.

• The Jews thus had no reason to regard comets with other than fear.

Page 54: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The nova would have appeared low in the east in the pre-dawn sky.

Page 55: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

The Star went before them…• Modern translations of the Bible

say that the Star was seen “at its rising” – in other words its first appearance in the dawn sky.

• This is exactly how the nova would have appeared in the sky.

• But the Star “went before the Magi” on the road between Jerusalem and Bethlehem.– The Star must have been in the

south at that time to appear OVER Bethlehem.

– Where would the nova have been Where would the nova have been after the after the 8 weeks the Magi would 8 weeks the Magi would have taken to arrive from Persia?have taken to arrive from Persia?

Page 56: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

By then the nova would have been almost exactly due south at dawn, leading the Magi to Bethlehem from Jerusalem.

Page 57: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.

Why complicate things?

• The Chinese nova of March 5BC offers a simple, plausible explanation of the Star.

• It fits in with the Biblical and other contemporary accounts of the Star and with historical knowledge.

• It would have appeared suddenly, unexpectedly, shining brightly in the dawn sky at just the right time.

• What better sign of the birth of a new-born king than a bright (absolutely realabsolutely real), new star?

Page 58: The Star of Bethlehem and the Christmas Story Myth, Fact and Reality.